Clinical efficacy of the smartplug™ in the treatment of primary Sjogren’s syndrome with keratoconjunctivitis SICCA: one-year follow-up study

Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease affecting 5% to 50% in different populations. The most severe cases of DED are often caused by aqueous deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) due to lacrimal gland (LG) hypofunction. Many patients with severe ADDE do not experience adequate symptom relief from topical treatment, severely reducing their quality of life. The focus of this review is to describe the surgical interventions presently being used or investigated when topical treatment with eye drops is insufficient. The conventional surgical approach is to proceed to punctal occlusion or partial or total tarsorrhaphy. However, novel surgical procedures have been reported to have higher efficacy and patient satisfaction than conventional treatments. These procedures include amniotic membrane transplantation, transposition or transplantation of the salivary glands, and cell-based injections into the LG, each with strengths and weaknesses. Further development of these treatment modalities might prove pivotal in treating dry eye patients in the future.

Treatment of Dry Eye With Intracanalicular Injection of Hydroxybutyl Chitosan: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Punctal/intracanalicular plugs on the market nowadays are all designed before clinical use in treating dry eye disease (DED). To provide an individualized lacrimal drainage system occlusion method and reduce the complications, we developed a “liquid plug” strategy by intracanalicular injection of hydroxybutyl chitosan (HBC) solution, a thermosensitive, phase-changing biomaterial. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the HBC plug in treating dry eye disease by comparing it with the VisiPlug absorbable intracanalicular plug.

Methods: A monocenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients with DED were randomized 1:1 to undergo either the HBC injection treatment or the VisiPlug treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescence staining (CFS), tear meniscus height (TMH), and phenol red thread test were evaluated at Day 0 (baseline, before treatment) and Weeks 1, 4, and 12.

Results: The two groups had a balanced baseline of age, gender, and DED-related characteristics. Both occlusion methods could relieve the symptoms and signs of DED. Significant improvement was found in OSDI, phenol red thread test, and tear meniscus height (P < 0.05 compared to baseline) but not in corneal fluorescence staining and tear break-up time (P > 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between HBC injection and VisiPlug at Weeks 1 and 4 (P > 0.05). However, at week 12, the HBC injection was not as effective as the VisiPlug in maintaining phenol red thread test (HBC: 5.35 ± 3.22 mm, VisiPlug: 8.59 ± 4.35 mm, P = 0.009) and tear meniscus height (HBC: 206.9 ± 47.95 μm, VisiPlug: 242.59 ± 60.30 μm, P = 0.041). The numbers of ocular adverse events were relatively low in both groups.

Conclusions: The HBC injection showed similar efficacy and safety compared to VisiPlug. The intracanalicular injection of HBC solution proves to be a promising, individualizing method to treat DED.

Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx), Identifier: ChiCTR1800016603.

Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic visits. The mainstay therapy for DED is artificial tears (ATs), which mimics tears and improves tear stability and properties. ATs have been found to improve symptoms and signs of disease in all DED subtypes, including aqueous deficient DED and evaporative DED. However, given the heterogeneity of DED, it is not surprising that ATs are not effective in all patients. When AT fails to relieve symptoms and/or signs of DED, it is critical to identify the underlying contributors to disease and escalate therapy appropriately. This includes underlying systemic diseases, meibomian gland dysfunction, anatomical abnormalities and neuropathic dysfunction. Thus, this review will discuss the benefits and limitations of ATs and review conditions when escalation of therapy should be considered in DED.

Autoimmune Dry Eye without Significant Ocular Surface Co-Morbidities and Mental Health

Dry eye symptoms can negatively affect the psychological, physical, and social functioning, which can potentially impair the health-related quality of life. This review evaluated the association between autoimmune related dry eye in the absence of significant ocular surface co-morbidities and mental health. This review found a significantly higher prevalence of mental health disorders (such as depression and anxiety) in systemic lupus erythematous, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, Behcet’s disease, and primary Sjogren’s syndrome patients when compared to the general population. Moreover, patients with depression and anxiety interpret ocular sensations differently than healthy controls and the perception of dry eye symptoms can be influenced by their mood. Somatization is common in depression, and this could influence the perception of ocular discomfort. Anti-depressants and anxiolytics with their potential side effects on the tear film status may also contribute or aggravate the dry eye symptoms in these patients. Although ophthalmologists manage the dry eye disease, as per standardized algorithms, they should be mindful of different ocular sensation interpretation and coexistent mental health issues in a large number of this patient group and initiate a multidisciplinary management plan in certain cases. While rheumatologists look after their autoimmune condition, it may be worth liaising with GP and/or psychiatrist colleagues in order to address their neuropathic type pain and mental health co-morbidities.

EULAR recommendations for the management of Sjögren’s syndrome with topical and systemic therapies

The therapeutic management of Sjögren syndrome (SjS) has not changed substantially in recent decades: treatment decisions remain challenging in clinical practice, without a specific therapeutic target beyond the relief of symptoms as the most important goal. In view of this scenario, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) promoted and supported an international collaborative study (EULAR SS Task Force) aimed at developing the first EULAR evidence and consensus-based recommendations for the management of patients with SjS with topical and systemic medications. The aim was to develop a rational therapeutic approach to SjS patients useful for healthcare professionals, physicians undergoing specialist training, medical students, the pharmaceutical industry and drug regulatory organisations following the 2014 EULAR standardised operating procedures. The Task Force (TF) included specialists in rheumatology, internal medicine, oral health, ophthalmology, gynaecology, dermatology and epidemiology, statisticians, general practitioners, nurses and patient representatives from 30 countries of the 5 continents. Evidence was collected from studies including primary SjS patients fulfilling the 2002/2016 criteria; when no evidence was available, evidence from studies including associated SjS or patients fulfilling previous sets of criteria was considered and extrapolated. The TF endorsed the presentation of general principles for the management of patients with SjS as three overarching, general consensus-based recommendations and 12 specific recommendations that form a logical sequence, starting with the management of the central triplet of symptoms (dryness, fatigue and pain) followed by the management of systemic disease. The recommendations address the use of topical oral (saliva substitutes) and ocular (artificial tear drops, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical corticosteroids, topical CyA, serum tear drops) therapies, oral muscarinic agonists (pilocarpine, cevimeline), hydroxychloroquine, oral glucocorticoids, synthetic immunosuppressive agents (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide and mycophenolate), and biological therapies (rituximab, abatacept and belimumab). For each recommendation, levels of evidence (mostly modest) and TF agreement (mostly very high) are provided. The 2019 EULAR recommendations are based on the evidence collected in the last 16 years in the management of primary 2002 SjS patients and on discussions between a large and broadly international TF. The recommendations synthesise current thinking on SjS treatment in a set of overarching principles and recommendations. We hope that the current recommendations will be broadly applied in clinical practice and/or serve as a template for national societies to develop local recommendations.

Efficacy and safety of topical and systemic medications: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of Sjögren's syndrome

Objective

To evaluate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of topical and systemic medications in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (SjS) to inform European League Against Rheumatism treatment recommendations.

Methods

The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for case-control/prospective cohort studies, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews.

Results

Current evidence in primary SjS patients fulfilling the 2002 criteria is based on the data from 9 RCTs, 18 prospective cohort studies and 5 case-control studies. Two Cochrane systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have reported that topical treatments for dry mouth and dry eye are safe and effective. Ocular cyclosporine A was safe and effective in two RCTs including 1039 patients with dry eye syndrome. Two Cochrane SLRs on serum tear drops and plugs showed inconsistency in possible benefits, both for symptoms and objective measures. Five RCTs reported significant improvements in oral dryness and salivary flow rates for pilocarpine and cevimeline. An RCT showed no significant placebo-differences for hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day for the primary outcome (visual analogue scale (VAS) composite of dryness, fatigue and pain). We identified seven RCTs carried out in primary SjS patients. RCTs using infliximab, anakinra and baminercept found no placebo-differences for the primary outcomes. The two largest RCTs randomised 255 patients to receive rituximab or placebo and reported no significant results in the primary outcome (VAS composite), while prospective studies suggested efficacy in systemic disease.

Conclusion

The current evidence supporting the use of the main topical therapeutic options of primary SjS is solid, while limited data from RCTs are available to guide systemic therapies.

Primary Sjögren's syndrome and the eye

Primary Sjögren syndrome is an autoimmune disease that mainly affects exocrine glands such as the salivary and lacrimal glands. In addition, systemic involvement is common. Primary Sjögren syndrome is of particular interest to ophthalmologists as it constitutes an important differential diagnosis in conditions with dry eye disease. In addition, ocular tests for more precisely diagnosing and monitoring primary Sjögren syndrome have become increasingly important, and new therapeutics for local and systemic treatment evolve as a result of increased understanding of immunological mechanisms and molecular pathways in the pathogenesis of primary Sjögren syndrome. We provide an update of interest to ophthalmologists regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, investigative procedures, and treatment options.

How to treat Sjögren's syndrome

SS is a chronic, autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology for which there is no known curative treatment. Although dryness of the eyes and mouth are the classically described features, patients often experience drying of other mucosal surfaces and systemic manifestations, including fatigue and arthralgia. There is an association with other autoimmune diseases, especially thyroid disease, coeliac disease and primary biliary cholangitis. Systemic features may affect up to 70% and include inflammatory arthritis, skin involvement, haematological abnormalities, neuropathies, interstitial lung disease and a 5-10% lifetime risk of B cell lymphoma. Treatment should aim to empower patients to manage their condition; conserve, replace and stimulate secretions; prevent damage; and suppress underlying systemic disease activity.

Spontaneous Canalicular Plug Erosion After Punctal Plug Placement

PURPOSE

To describe a case of keratoconjunctivitis sicca treated with punctal plug placement with the first reported complication of subsequent plug erosion through the canaliculus and extrusion through the lid.

METHODS

Punctal plugs were placed in a patient with Sjogren syndrome for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. More than 12 years later, the plug was noted to have eroded through the canaliculus and extruded through the conjunctiva and lid.

RESULTS

The extruded plug was removed, and punctal cautery was performed on 2 other puncta with improved symptom control.

CONCLUSIONS

Plug extrusion through the conjunctiva and lid is a possible consequence of punctal plug placement.

Treatment of Sjögren's syndrome-associated dry eye an evidence-based review

BACKGROUND

Outcomes-based review of reported treatment options for patients with dry eye secondary to Sjögren's syndrome (SS).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Dry eye affects many individuals worldwide. Significant proportion of patients with dry eye has underlying SS, a progressive autoimmune condition. The few suggested guidelines for the treatment of dry eye are mostly based on severity of symptoms and/or clinical findings rather than on outcomes analysis, and do not differentiate SS from other causes of dry eye. METHODS AND LITERATURE REVIEW: A search strategy was developed to identify prospective, interventional studies of treatments for SS-associated dry eye from electronic databases. Eligible references were restricted to English-language articles published after 1975. These sources were augmented by hand searches of reference lists from accessed articles. Study selection, data extraction, and grading of evidence were completed independently by ≥4 review authors.

RESULTS

The searches identified 3559 references as of August 10, 2010. After duplicate review of the titles and abstracts, 245 full-text papers were assessed, 62 of which were relevant for inclusion in the review.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current literature on SS-associated dry eye, there is a paucity of rigorous clinical trials to support therapy recommendations. Nonetheless, the recommended treatments include topical lubricants, topical anti-inflammatory therapy, and tear-conserving strategies. The efficacy of oral secretagogues seems greater in the treatment of oral dryness than ocular dryness. Although oral hydroxychloroquine is commonly prescribed to patients with SS to alleviate fatigue and arthralgias, the literature lacks strong evidence for the efficacy of this treatment for dry eye.