Ulnar nerve measurements in healthy individuals to obtain reference values

A functional tacrolimus-releasing nerve wrap for enhancing nerve regeneration following surgical nerve repair

JOURNAL/nrgr/04.03/01300535-202501000-00036/figure1/v/2024-05-14T021156Z/r/image-tiff Axonal regeneration following surgical nerve repair is slow and often incomplete, resulting in poor functional recovery which sometimes contributes to lifelong disability. Currently, there are no FDA-approved therapies available to promote nerve regeneration. Tacrolimus accelerates axonal regeneration, but systemic side effects presently outweigh its potential benefits for peripheral nerve surgery. The authors describe herein a biodegradable polyurethane-based drug delivery system for the sustained local release of tacrolimus at the nerve repair site, with suitable properties for scalable production and clinical application, aiming to promote nerve regeneration and functional recovery with minimal systemic drug exposure. Tacrolimus is encapsulated into co-axially electrospun polycarbonate-urethane nanofibers to generate an implantable nerve wrap that releases therapeutic doses of bioactive tacrolimus over 31 days. Size and drug loading are adjustable for applications in small and large caliber nerves, and the wrap degrades within 120 days into biocompatible byproducts. Tacrolimus released from the nerve wrap promotes axon elongation in vitro and accelerates nerve regeneration and functional recovery in preclinical nerve repair models while off-target systemic drug exposure is reduced by 80% compared with systemic delivery. Given its surgical suitability and preclinical efficacy and safety, this system may provide a readily translatable approach to support axonal regeneration and recovery in patients undergoing nerve surgery.

Round table discussion: the management of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome

Idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common neuropathy in the upper limb. Best evidence regarding the surgical management of this condition has evolved from anterior or submuscular transposition as the former reference standard, to in situ simple release. Differences of opinion remain regarding the timing of surgery, type of surgery and adjunctive surgery. Four surgeons with Level 5 expertise were asked to answer specific questions regarding this condition.

Ultra-high-definition (22 MHz) ultrasound of the ulnar nerve: additional value and normative data

We studied 30 healthy volunteers (60 arms), categorized into three age groups with equal numbers to verify if a 22 MHz compared with a 15 MHz ultrasound transducer has additional value for studying the intraneural architecture of the ulnar nerve throughout its course. At six sites, there were no differences in cross-sectional area measurements between the two transducers. With both, the cross-sectional area was significantly larger at the medial epicondyle compared with the other sites and smaller at the mid-forearm and Guyon's canal compared with the mid-upper arm. With higher age the cross-sectional area significantly increased. Significantly more fascicles were visible distal to the medial epicondyle compared with more proximal sites, as well as in men compared with women. Finally, higher body weight was related to a significantly smaller number of fascicles being seen. A 22 MHz transducer depicts more details of the intraneural architecture than a 15 MHz transducer. Our data can be used as normative data or reference values in analysing ulnar nerve pathology.Level of evidence: II.

Molecular, Electrophysiological, and Ultrasonographic Differences in Selected Immune-Mediated Neuropathies with Therapeutic Implications

The spectrum of immune-mediated neuropathies is broad and the different subtypes are still being researched. With the numerous subtypes of immune-mediated neuropathies, establishing the appropriate diagnosis in normal clinical practice is challenging. The treatment of these disorders is also troublesome. The authors have undertaken a literature review of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The molecular, electrophysiological and ultrasound features of these autoimmune polyneuropathies are analyzed, highlighting the differences in diagnosis and ultimately treatment. The immune dysfunction can lead to damage to the peripheral nervous system. In practice, it is suspected that these disorders are caused by autoimmunity to proteins located in the node of Ranvier or myelin components of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. The electrophysiological presence of conduction blocks is another important factor characterizing separate subgroups of treatment-naive motor neuropathies, including multifocal CIDP (synonyms: multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block), which differs from multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) in both responses to treatment modalities and electrophysiological features. Ultrasound is a reliable method for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, particularly when alternative diagnostic examinations yield inconclusive results. In overall terms, the management of these disorders includes immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the development of more disease-specific immunotherapies should expand the therapeutic possibilities for these debilitating diseases.

Relationship between Medial Elbow Pain, Flexor Pronator Muscles, and the Ulnar Nerve in Baseball Players Using Ultrasonography

We aimed to clarify changes cross-sectional area (CSA) in flexor pronator muscles and the ulnar nerve (UN) in players with medial elbow pain between pitching phases. Forty-two male baseball players with and without medial elbow pain during throwing were included in this study. The players were divided into maximum external rotation (MER) and ball release (BR) groups according to the pitching phase in which pain was reported. The imaged region was the flexor digital profundus, flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum superficialis, and pronator teres muscles, as well as the UN. CSA at rest and during contraction was assessed using the ultrasonography software tracing function. For statistical analysis, the CSA at rest and at contraction in the healthy group, MER group and BR group was compared using one-way analysis of variance. There was a significant difference in CSA only in the FCU between the healthy (95.4 ± 15.5%) and the MER group (76.6 ± 12.5%) at rest (p = 0.004). There were significant differences in the UN between the healthy (105.0 ± 27.7%) and MER groups (176.4 ± 53.5%), and between the healthy and BR groups (132.9±21.1%) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.038, respectively). Our results suggest that athletes with medial elbow pain during the MER of pitching have ulnar nerve swelling.

Role of dynamic ultrasound in assessment of the snapping elbow and distal biceps tendon injury

Introduction

Ultrasound is useful in assessing patients with snapping syndromes around the elbow joint. The dynamic nature of the examination allows for direct visualisation of the underlying causative factor.Topic description: We discuss the role of dynamic ultrasound in assessing various snapping syndromes around the elbow, such as ulnar nerve instability, snapping triceps and less commonly, snapping brachialis. Ultrasound is also useful in evaluating the distal biceps tendon, particularly in differentiating partial from complete tendon injury.

Discussion

Ulnar nerve instability and snapping triceps can be assessed via a medial approach with the transducer placed transversely between the medial epicondyle and the olecranon. In ulnar nerve instability, the nerve can be seen crossing over the medial epicondyle on elbow flexion. In snapping triceps syndrome, both the ulnar nerve and the distal triceps can be seen dislocating over the medial epicondyle. Dynamic assessment of the distal biceps tendon using a lateral approach minimises anisotropy artefact often seen on the anterior approach. Passive pronation and supination of the forearm will reveal little or no movement in a completely torn tendon whereas moving tendon fibres will be appreciated in partial tears. In a snapping brachialis, the medial portion of brachialis will be seen abnormally translocating anterolateral to the medial border of the trochlea during elbow flexion and snapping back into its normal position on elbow extension.

Conclusion

Dynamic ultrasound of the elbow is valuable in diagnosing patients with snapping sensations around the joint and in evaluating the integrity of the distal biceps tendon.

Cross-sectional area reference values for high-resolution ultrasonography of the lower extremity nerves in healthy Korean adults

The cross-sectional area (CSA) reference values of the lower extremity nerves in Asians have been rarely reported. For this study, 107 sex- and age-matched, healthy subjects with a mean age of 46 years (range, 24-75 years) were recruited. All subjects underwent standardized nerve conduction studies of the upper and lower extremities. The CSA was measured unilaterally at 12 sites in the lower extremity nerves, including the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, sciatic, common peroneal, superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, tibial, and sural nerves. The CSA significantly correlated with height, weight, and body mass index. The CSA was significantly larger in males than females at most nerves except for the lateral femoral cutaneous, common peroneal (fibular head), and superficial peroneal nerves (distal calf). There was no statistically significant difference between the age groups except for the tibial nerve (ankle). The results of this study provide CSA reference values for the lower extremity nerves including small branches and the values can be useful in the ultrasonographic investigation of various peripheral neuropathies in East Asian populations.

Management of Recalcitrant Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common upper extremity compressive neuropathy. Recalcitrant cubital tunnel syndrome poses diagnostic and treatment challenges. Potential etiologies of persistent or recurrent symptoms after surgical treatment include an inaccurate preoperative diagnosis, incomplete nerve decompression, iatrogenic injury, postsurgical perineural adhesions, irreversible nerve pathology, or conditions associated with secondary nerve compression. Confirmation of recalcitrant ulnar nerve pathology relies on a thorough history to consider symptoms and chronology, careful examination to quantify nerve function and to assess for focal nerve provocation, and objective testing to highlight a possible nerve lesion such as ultrasonography and electrodiagnostic testing. Conservative treatment may provide symptomatic relief; however, surgical management such as revision neuroplasty, neurolysis, nerve reconstruction, and/or anterior transposition may be indicated. Optimizing the biology of the local nerve environment is critical. No surgical treatment procedure has shown superiority over another; however, individualized treatment is emphasized to improve symptoms and maximize nerve recovery potential.

Cross-sectional area reference values for high-resolution ultrasonography of the upper extremity nerves in healthy Asian adults

In this study, multiple-site, cross-sectional area (CSA) reference values were established for major peripheral nerves, including small branches, in the upper extremity of a healthy Asian population.This study included 107 prospectively recruited age-matched, healthy subjects with a mean age of 46 years (range, 24-75 years). All subjects underwent standardized nerve conduction studies for the median, ulnar, peroneal, posterior tibial, and sural nerves. CSA was measured unilaterally at 21 sites of the median, ulnar, radial, posterior interosseous, superficial radial sensory, musculocutaneous, lateral antebrachial cutaneous, and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves.According to their age, the subjects were assigned to the younger group (20-40 years, n = 40), the middle group (40-59 years, n = 40), and the older group (60-80 years, n = 27). The significant differences of CSA values between age groups were found only at certain sites, such as the median (wrist, P = .003), ulnar (medial epicondyle, P = .031; forearm, P = .022), radial (antecubital fossa, P = .037), and superficial radial sensory nerve (P = .028). The CSA significantly correlated with gender, height, weight, and body mass index.This study provides CSA reference values for nerves, including small sensory nerves in the upper extremity, which can be useful in the ultrasonographic investigation of various peripheral neuropathies in the upper extremity.

Challenging the dogma: anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is indicated in recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome

The current evidence for treatment of primary idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome favours an in situ release. However, anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve remains a popular procedure in recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome. For more than 20 years, I have performed an extended in situ release only, and achieved similar or better results than with nerve transposition. In performing a systematic review of the evidence for surgery for recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome, I could only include 16 out of 296 studies regarding treatment of recurrent cases of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis was not possible, due to selection bias and disparity of outcome measurements of the studies. However, I could not find robust evidence that supports the need of an anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome over an in situ decompression. My own experience of an extended in situ release with complete neurolysis with reasonable outcomes, in combination with the lack of literature support of anterior transposition in recurrent cases, have led me to the consideration that this dogma should be revised.

Ulnar Nerve Cross-Sectional Area for the Diagnosis of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Ultrasonographic Measurements

OBJECTIVE

To examine the performance of sonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS).

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases, comprising PubMed and EMBASE, were searched for the pertinent literature before July 1, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Fourteen trials comparing the ulnar nerve CSA measurements between participants with and without CuTS were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study design, participants' demographic characteristics, diagnostic reference of CuTS, and methods of CSA measurement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among different elbow levels, the between-group difference in CSA was the largest at the medial epicondyle (6.0mm²; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-7.4mm²). The pooled mean CSA in participants without CuTS was 5.5mm² (95% CI, 4.4-6.6mm²) at the arm level, 7.4mm² (95% CI, 6.7-8.1mm²) at the cubital tunnel inlet, 6.6mm² (95% CI, 5.9-7.2mm²) at the medial epicondyle, 7.3mm² (95% CI, 5.6-9.0mm²) at the cubital tunnel outlet, and 5.5mm² (95% CI, 4.7-6.3mm²) at the forearm level. The sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios pooled from 5 studies, using 10mm² as the cutoff point, were .85 (95% CI, .78-.90), .91 (95% CI, .86-.94), and 53.96 (95% CI, 14.84-196.14), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ulnar nerve CSA measured by ultrasound imaging is useful for the diagnosis of CuTS and is most significantly different between patients and participants without CuTS at the medial epicondyle. Because the ulnar nerve CSA in healthy participants, at various locations, rarely exceeds 10mm², this value can be considered as a cutoff point for diagnosing ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow region.

Estimation of ultrasound reference values for the ulnar nerve fascicular number and cross-sectional area in young males: A cross-sectional study

The objective of this study is to estimate the reference values for the number of fascicles and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve at a single predetermined site by ultrasound in healthy young adult males.The demographic and physical characteristics of 50 adult male volunteers were evaluated and recorded. The subjects were positioned supine with the elbow flexed at 90° and the palm of the hand placed on a hard surface. The ulnar nerve was scanned bilaterally 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle in projection of the cubital tunnel. The number of fascicles and mean CSA of the ulnar nerve were identified. In addition, the side-to-side differences of the estimated reference values and their correlations with the age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated.The mean fascicular number was 5.66 ± 1.48, the mean ultrasound-estimated CSA of the ulnar nerve was 6.54 ± 1.67 mm and both sides were comparable in the mean CSA and fascicular number (6.43 ± 1.80 mm and 5.88 vs 6.64 ± 1.55 mm and 5.44, for right and left side, respectively). No significant correlations were observed between CSA and fascicles number and age, weight, height, or BMI of study subjects.The reference values for the number of fascicles number and the CSA of the ulnar nerve at a single predetermined site were identified. These values could be used for the sonographic diagnosis and follow-up of the ulnar nerve lesions.

Peripheral nerve ultrasound in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotypes

INTRODUCTION

In this study we sought to determine the cross-sectional area (CSA) of peripheral nerves in patients with distinct subtypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS

Ulnar and median nerve ultrasound was performed in 78 ALS patients [classic, n = 21; upper motor neuron dominant (UMND), n = 14; lower motor neuron dominant (LMND), n = 20; bulbar, n = 15; primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), n = 8] and 18 matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, ALS patients had significant, distally pronounced reductions of ulnar CSA (forearm/wrist level) across all disease groups, except for PLS. Median nerve CSA (forearm/wrist level) did not differ between controls and ALS.

CONCLUSION

Ulnar nerve ultrasound in ALS subgroups revealed significant differences in distal CSA values, which suggests it has value as a marker of LMN involvement. Its potential was particularly evident in the UMND and PLS groups, which can be hard to separate clinically, yet their accurate separation has major prognostic implications.

Does the ulnar nerve enlarge after surgical transposition?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that symptomatic transposed ulnar nerves have a larger average cross-sectional area (CSA) than symptomatic in situ ulnar nerves.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the charts and sonograms of 68 patients who had failed ulnar nerve transposition compared to 48 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who had not undergone surgical management. In addition, postoperative sonograms were compared with preoperative studies when available. Failure was defined as persistence or recurrence of symptoms of ulnar neuropathy postoperatively. The cross-sectional area of the nerve, subjective echogenicity, and residual sites of compression were recorded. Groups were subsequently compared by t tests.

RESULTS

The failed ulnar nerve transposition group showed a mean cross-sectional area ± SD of 17.26 ± 9.93 mm(2), whereas the control group showed a mean cross-sectional area of 13.45 ± 7.33 mm(2). This difference was statistically significant (P= .018). Nontransposed nerves were more likely to have identifiable sites of compression (P< .05). There was a trend toward postoperative enlargement in the 6 patients with available preoperative imaging (P = .17). No difference in subjective echogenicity was found in this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with failed ulnar nerve transposition show a significantly enlarged cross-sectional area when compared to symptomatic nerves in situ. Although a specific etiology for this difference cannot be determined, the data suggest that the reference ranges for the cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve may need to be revised for those who have undergone surgery.

Ultrasound diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy: comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic nerve thickness

There is still no consensus on a normal value for the cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Such data would be valuable for the ultrasound diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy. Comparison of the symptomatic and contralateral asymptomatic sides has been recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not the asymptomatic ulnar nerve could be a reference value. High-resolution ultrasonic measurements of the cross-sectional areas of the ulnar nerves at the elbow were compared with 38 contralateral asymptomatic elbows of patients with unilateral ulnar neuropathy and 38 healthy controls. There were significant differences in the cross-sectional areas at all levels between the healthy control subjects and asymptomatic side of the ulnar neuropathy patients (p < 0.05). The findings of this study suggest that there is a limitation in using the asymptomatic side for obtaining reference values in ultrasonographic studies. Each ultrasonographic laboratory should determine its own reference values.