Patterns of magnetic resonance imaging of the foot in rheumatoid arthritis: which joints are most frequently involved?

Topography of Bone Erosions at the Metatarsophalangeal Joints in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Bilateral Mapping by Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

To describe the bilateral anatomical location of bone erosions (BE) at the metatarsophalangeal joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients with established rheumatoid arthritis prospectively underwent computed tomography of both forefeet. Each joint surface of the metatarsal heads (MTH) and the proximal phalangeal bases were divided into four quadrants: superior, plantar, tibial, and fibular. The number of BE was cumulatively counted per patient, side, joint, per joint surface, and quadrant. Descriptive statistics, paired and unpaired samples t-tests, Pearson's correlation coefficients, ANOVA 2, and variance component analysis were performed.

RESULTS

There were 288 BE at the MTH and 66 at the proximal phalanges. The number of BE in one forefoot was a poor predictor of the absolute number of BE on the contralateral foot "r=0.54" and was unrelated to symptoms. The superior quadrants were less frequently affected than other quadrants for both the MTH "p<0.0001" and proximal phalanges "p<0.001." The tibial quadrant showed a higher number of BE compared to all other quadrants for MTH "p<0.03," proximal phalanges "p<0.01, and for the metatarsophalangeal joint as a whole "p<0.0001." Plantar and fibular quadrants were equally affected "p<0.05."

CONCLUSION

BE were found more frequently on the tibial side of the MTH in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

[MRI diagnostics in inflammatory joint and spinal diseases: protocols and special sequences: when and for what?]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important component in rheumatology for imaging diagnostics and therapy monitoring of inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases of the spine and peripheral joints. The correct selection of suitable and practical MRI protocols and sequences represents a great challenge for physicians with respect to requesting and interpreting the indications for MRI investigations. This review article provides recommendations and suggestions for MRI investigation protocols for clinical utilization and practice. New sequences are evaluated and assessed in order to generate the best possible standardized and comparable examinations for rheumatology in the future and therefore optimize the quality of radiological interventions.

Validity of the rheumatoid arthritis MRI score applied to the forefeet using the OMERACT filter: a systematic literature review

Objective

MRI depicts inflammation and structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The validity of MRI-scoring of wrist-joints and metacarpophalangeal-joints according to the RA MRI score(RAMRIS) has been demonstrated. The Outcomes in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RAMRIS Working Group recently called for validation of the RAMRIS of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-joints. Therefore, a systematic literature review was performed to test if the RAMRIS applied to the MTP-joints meets the OMERACT Filter of Truth, Discrimination and Feasibility.

Methods

Medical literature databases up to January 2018 were systematically reviewed for studies reporting on RAMRIS applied to MRI of the MTP-joints in RA. To be included, an article had to contain at least one MRI-feature (synovitis, bone marrow oedema (BME), tenosynovitis, erosion, joint space narrowing (JSN)) and one item from the OMERACT Filter: Truth (face, content and construct validity), Discrimination (test-retest reliability, ability to discriminate in trials, longitudinal construct validity and thresholds of meaning) and Feasibility.

Results

Of the 749 retrieved studies, 13 were included, of which 9 provided data on construct validity, 4 on discrimination (3 on reliability, 2 on longitudinal construct validity and 1 on ability to discriminate in trials) and none on feasibility. Construct validity was suggested for BME and erosions, but lacking for synovitis, tenosynovitis and JSN. Data for discrimination remain to be developed for all outcomes.

Conclusion

According to the OMERACT Filter, the validity of the RAMRIS of the forefeet is insufficient in different aspects. A research agenda was determined.