Evaluating the reliability of Persian version of ankylosing spondylitis quality of life (ASQoL) questionnaire and related clinical and demographic parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

The effects of supervision on the outcomes of exercise training in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A single-blind randomized controlled trial

AIM

Exercise training is crucial for managing ankylosing spondylitis. We evaluated the effects of exercise with different levels of supervision on clinical outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

We performed a single-blind randomized controlled trial in a university outpatient clinic. Overall, 45 (31 men) patients with ankylosing spondylitis were randomly allocated to 3 groups. The mean (SD) for age and disease duration were 39.3 (9.3) and 8.4 (7.8) years. The primary outcome was chest expansion in cm, and the secondary outcomes were the index scores of 5 standard questionnaires. For each participant, adalimumab 40 mg/0.8 mL/2 wk was injected and a 3-session exercise program per week for 1 month was prescribed. Controls received a pamphlet on the exercise program. Another group received the pamphlet and underwent a 2-hour training session. The supervised group received the pamphlet, and the 2-hour training, and completed the program by attending each exercise session in the clinic.

RESULTS

Within-group analysis showed significant improvement in chest expansion (P = 0.016) and all subjective or objective questionnaire scores (all P < 0.001) for the full-supervised group. Between-group analysis implied best outcomes for chest expansion (P = 0.046), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (P < 0.001), Bath Disease Activity (P = 0.010), and Metrology (P = 0.002) Indices for ankylosing spondylitis. The group with 2-hour training experienced an improvement in some indices, and the control group did not show significant changes in the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the prescription of a supervised training program instead of in-home exercises for patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

The validity and reliability of quality of life questionnaires in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients who suffered from ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) often have poor quality of life (QoL) and there has been a substantial increase in research on acceptable questionnaires for assessment of QoL. This systematic review aims at examining the validity and reliability of QoL questionnaires in patients with AS/nr-axSpA.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort trials, and cross-sectional trails were retrieved by searching seven databases. Primary outcomes included test-retest reliability and construct validity. Secondary outcomes included internal consistency, structural validity, responsiveness and so on. Data extraction and analyses were conducted according to the Cochrane standards. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklists was used to assess the risk of bias for each included study. We used the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) to assess the methodological quality and measurement property of included instruments. The quality of evidence on pre-specified outcomes were assessed by the Grades of Recommendations, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

22 publications containing 10 self-rating instruments were included in this study. Most studies were cross-sectional in design and a total of 3,085 participants were enrolled. 19 studies had moderate to high test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha (α) Coefficients were generally high (0.79-0.97) for overall scales. The ankylosing spondylitis quality of life (ASQOL) and evaluation of ankylosing spondylitis quality of life (EASi-QoL) questionnaires showed the strongest measurement properties in high-quality studies. The correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability of the ASQOL questionnaire was 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89). The pooled Cronbach's α coefficients of the ASQOL questionnaire and the EASi-QoL questionnaire were high. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were considered as two validity criteria. For the ASQOL and EASi-QoL questionnaire, pooled convergent validity associations with BASDAI and BASFI were low to strong (0.24-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated acceptable reliability and stability of included QoL questionnaires. The ASQOL and the EASi-QoL questionnaires are validated and reliable disease-specific questionnaires for the assessment of QoL in patients with AS/nr-axSpA.

Association of fear assessment in inflammatory rheumatic diseases (FAIR) questionnaire with ankylosing spondylitis quality of life and disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Background/Aim: Fear against disease course, treatment, and limitations in family, work, and social life are commonly seen but mostly overlooked by physicians of patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease in young adults characterized by limitations in spinal mobility. The Fear Assessment (FAIR) Questionnaire was designed especially for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis to assess the level of fear from the patient’s perspective. Here we evaluate the FAIR score in AS patients and its association with disease activity, AS quality of life (ASQoL), depression, anxiety, and fatigue levels. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 79 patients with AS, and disease activity was assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), AS-Disease Activity Score-C reactive protein, and functional status was assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). Patient global assessment of disease and pain were scored on 0–10 cm visual analog scores. All patients completed FAIR and ASQoL questionnaires. The depression and anxiety were evaluated by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and fatigue was assessed by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Results: The mean age of AS patients (62% male) was 41.7 (11.3) years. Most of the patients were on biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The patients’ median BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, and BASFI were 5.4 (range, 3.8–7.4), 3.83 (1.4), and 4.0 (range, 2.3–6.2), respectively. The overall FAIR, ASQoL, FSS, HADS-depression, and HADS-anxiety scores were 75 (range, 52–91), 9.6 (5.2), 5.4 (range, 4.1–7), 7.7 (4.4) and 9.6 (5.2), respectively. There were statistically significant correlations between disease activity indices and FAIR, ASQoL, FSS, and HADS scores. The FAIR scores significantly correlated with ASQoL, FSS, and HADS scores. The patients with active disease (BASDAI ≥ 4) had significantly higher levels of FAIR, ASQoL, FSS, and HADS. The best cut-off value for the FAIR score of AS patients with moderate to severe disease activity was 50 (AUC: 0.734, 95% CI [0.599–0.870], P = 0.002), with a sensitivity of 89.8%, specificity of 55%, positive likelihood ratio of 1.99, and Youden index of 0.45. Conclusion: This study shows that AS patients face a high level of fear which is associated with higher disease activity, higher risk of mood disorders, and lower quality of life. Physicians should not only focus on the physical improvement of the patient but also handle the fear of patients against their diseases and their treatment. This holistic approach will improve the dialogue between the physician and the patient, which will result in increased compliance with treatment and will raise the quality of care.

Gastrointestinal risk factors and patient-reported outcomes of ankylosing spondylitis in Korea

Aim

This study examined the degree of gastrointestinal (GI) risk and patient‐reported outcomes including GI‐related symptoms, adherence to non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease activity and quality of life (QoL) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

Cross‐sectional, observational study conducted at six nationwide, university‐based hospitals of Korea. AS patients treated with NSAIDs for at least 2 weeks were included between March and September 2016. Demographic and clinical data were gathered through a medical chart review and patient survey. GI risk was estimated using Standardized Calculator of Risk for Events (SCORE). NSAIDs adherence was investigated with Morisky Medication Adherence Scale‐8 (MMAS‐8). Disease activity and QoL were examined with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and EuroQol‐3L (EQ‐5D, EQ‐visual analog scale [EQ‐VAS]), respectively. Path analysis was implemented to estimate pathways of GI risk, GI symptoms and NSAIDs adherence to QoL.

Results

A total of 596 patients (age: 38.9 ± 12.6 years, male: 82.1%) participated in the study, of which 33.2% experienced GI symptoms during NSAID treatment, and 34.2% of them showed ongoing GI symptoms upon enrollment. According to SCORE, 37.1% of patients showed moderate to very high GI risk. No patient showed high adherence according to MMAS‐8, so 55.3% of patients with moderate adherence were considered adherent. BASDAI and QoL of the total patients were 3.5 ± 2.0, 0.6 ± 0.3 (EQ‐5D), and 67.4 ± 19.8 (EQ‐VAS), respectively. From path analyses, higher GI risk significantly lowered QoL.

Conclusion

This study suggests timely therapeutic strategies should be implemented to manage GI risk during NSAID treatment in order to effectively manage AS.

It is time for an organised, scientific approach to the application of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical studies and trials

Too often, clinicians and researchers assume that patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are simply designed, can be changed to suit specific circumstances and should be freely available for use without seeking permission. If a version is not easily available, they believe they can produce a new translation without relevant experience or expertise. Copyright issues are inconvenient and commonly ignored, despite some journals requesting confirmation from authors that permission had been granted for use of copyrighted materials. When informed that authors of an article did not have such permission, the response from an editor was that nothing could be done as he had to rely on the word of the authors.In fact, high quality PROMs are carefully designed, developed for new cultures by means of proven standardised methodologies, carefully re-validated in the new culture and then administered by a responsible organisation to ensure that they are used appropriately in studies. If such care has not been taken, questions should be raised about the quality of the measure and the information it generates.Several problems have arisen with the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL). This is probably because it is recognised as the most appropriate measure of quality of life for people with Ankylosing Spondylitis and has been widely used in international clinical trials and studies. Fifty-seven official language adaptations of the questionnaire have been produced. Unfortunately, as a result of unauthorised adaptation and use, questions are raised about the validity of several publications that have used the ASQoL.

Association study between killer immunoglobulin-like receptor polymorphisms and ankylosing spondylitis disease: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several genetic studies have assessed the association between polymorphisms in killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) genes and susceptibility of individuals to ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but the findings have been inconclusive and incongruous. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis of all case-control studies meeting the inclusion criteria for obtaining an exact conclusion of the effect of KIR polymorphisms on the risk of AS.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases, including Scopus web of science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed to find all eligible studies exploring the association between KIR polymorphisms and the risk of AS, prior to June 2017. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95% CIs were used to evaluate the strength of the association between KIR polymorphisms and the risk of AS.

RESULTS

A total of 16 case-control studies, encompassed in 12 papers, with 1770 cases and 2907 healthy subjects were included in the meta-analysis. This meta-analysis revealed three significant positive associations of 2DS1, 2DS5, and 3DS1 with susceptibility to AS, while two significant negative associations of 2DL2 and 2DS2 with susceptibility to AS were identified. In the subgroup analysis based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*27 positive patients and healthy subjects, results indicated that there were four significant positive associations between 2DL5, 2DS4, 2DS5, 3DS1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to AS in HLA-B*27-positive patients; a significant negative association of 3DL1 in HLA-B*27-positive patients was found.

CONCLUSIONS

While 2DS1, 2DS5, and 3DS1 polymorphisms increased AS risk, 2DL2 and 2DS2 polymorphisms were associated with reduced AS susceptibility.

HLA-B*27 subtypes and their implications in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a highly heritable kind of arthritis that affects the vertebral column. AS risk has been associated strongly with Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*27. In fact, some HLA-B*27 subtypes have been associated with the increased disease risk, although some specific subtypes have not shown such associations. It is supposed that HLA-B*27 plays a major role in the etiopathogenesis of the disease. However, the difference in pathogenic outcomes of HLA-B*27 certain subtypes needs to be clarified. The purpose of this review article is to overview on the detailed implications of the HLA-B*27 subtypes in the etiopathogenesis of AS. Moreover, the role of ERAP1 in AS and its epistasis with HLA-B*27 have been reviewed.

Diagnostic Delay in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Related Factors and Prognostic Outcomes

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate diagnostic delay, factors which are related to diagnostic delay, and the effect of diagnostic delay on prognostic outcomes in terms of spinal and hip mobility, functional status, disease activity, quality of life, cervical rotation, tragus to wall distance, and sacroiliitis severity in an Iranian population with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Patients and methods

One hundred and sixty three patients (129 males, 34 females; mean age 37.74±9.88 years; range 18 to 65 years) with AS who met modified New York 1984 criteria were enrolled consecutively in a cross sectional survey. The main outcome variable (diagnostic delay) was defined as the interval between appearance of first symptoms and correct diagnosis of AS. Enthesitis, negative human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA- B27), and educational level were among the factors of which their relationship to diagnostic delay were evaluated. The prognostic outcomes were measured using Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index, Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index, AS quality of life, Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index, chest expansion, and radiographic sacroiliitis severity.

Results

Diagnostic delay was mean 7.88±7.17 years. Diagnostic delay was longer in patients with enthesitis (8.80±7.27) compared to patients without enthesitis (6.04±6.66) (p=0.007) and in HLA-B27 negative patients (10.10±7.44) compared to HLA-B27 positive patients (7.14±6.96) (p=0.013). Educational level was negatively correlated with diagnostic delay (p=0.002, r= -0.24). Diagnostic delay was correlated with Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (p=0.003, r=0.23), Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (p=0.026, r=0.18), AS quality of life (p=0.008, r=0.21), Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (p<0.001, r=0.41), chest expansion (p<0.001, r= - 0.38), and sacroiliitis grading (p=0.042, r=0.16).

Conclusion

Negative HLA-B27, enthesitis, and low educational level are factors which affect diagnostic delay in AS. Individuals with enthesitis or low educational level should be evaluated accurately without causing delay in diagnosis since longer delay may lead to poorer prognostic outcomes.