Anti-TNF-α therapy reduces endothelial cell activation in non-diabetic ankylosing spondylitis patients

Impact of inflammation and anti-inflammatory therapies on the incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the independent effect of inflammatory burden and various treatments on the risk of incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.

METHODS

AS patients were retrospectively selected from a territory-wide database between 2006 and 2015, and were followed until the end of 2018. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of MACE. Multivariate time-varying Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the associations between inflammatory burden (measured by c-reactive protein [CRP] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) and different therapies with incident MACE, after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 3827 patients with AS (mean age: 45.2 ± 15.0 years, male: 2911 [76.1 %]) were recruited. After a follow-up of 23,275 person-years, 135 patients (3.5 %) developed a first MACE. Univariate analyses showed that elevated ESR and CRP levels, and the use of glucocorticoids were associated with a significantly higher risk of MACE, while the use of sulfasalazine (SLZ), biologic DMARDs and non-cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (non-COX-IIi) were associated with reduced risk of MACE. After adjusting for CV risk factors in the multivariable models, only ESR (HR: 1.02; ESR ≥30 mm/h, HR:1.94) and CRP level (HR: 1.14; CRP >3 mg/dl HR:5.43) remained significantly associated with increased risk of MACE, while SLZ use (HR: 0.41-0.52) was protective against MACE.

CONCLUSION

High inflammatory burden was an independent predictor associated with an increased risk of MACE, while the use of SLZ might reduce risk of incident MACE in patients with AS.

Cardiovascular disease in spondyloarthritis: a narrative review of risk factors and the effect of treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the recent evidence available regarding the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in spondyloarthritis (SpA), including the effect of disease modifying drugs on cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

People with SpA suffer from an increased risk of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. This elevated risk is explained by the high prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation from disease activity leading to endothelial dysfunction and accelerated atherosclerosis. Consequently, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European League Against Rheumatism recommend enhanced cardiovascular risk screening in SpA patients. There is evidence from observational studies that methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in SpA. Unlike what is observed in the general population, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs does not appear to increase cardiovascular disease risk in SpA.

SUMMARY

Cardiovascular diseases are increasingly recognized in patients suffering from SpA, especially axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis. Cardiovascular diseases can cause significant morbidity, mortality, and add to the overall disease burden. Disease modifying drugs may mitigate some of the cardiovascular risk; however, a multidisciplinary team is needed to monitor patients and improve cardiovascular health status.

Cardiovascular risk in axial spondyloarthritis-a systematic review

Cardiovascular manifestations are common in patients suffering axial spondyloarthritis and can result in substantial morbidity and disease burden. To give an overview of this important aspect of axial spondyloarthritis, we conducted a systematic literature search of all articles published between January 2000 and 25 May 2023 on cardiovascular manifestations. Using PubMed and SCOPUS, 123 out of 6792 articles were identified and included in this review. Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis seems to be underrepresented in studies; thus, more evidence for ankylosing spondylitis exists. All in all, we found some traditional risk factors that led to higher cardiovascular disease burden or major cardiovascular events. These specific risk factors seem to be more aggressive in patients with spondyloarthropathies and have a strong connection to high or long-standing disease activity. Since disease activity is a major driver of morbidity, diagnostic, therapeutic, and lifestyle interventions are crucial for better outcomes. Key Points • Several studies on axial spondyloarthritis and associated cardiovascular diseases have been conducted in the last few years addressing risk stratification of these patients including artificial intelligence. • Recent data suggest distinct manifestations of cardiovascular disease entities among men and women which the treating physician needs to be aware of. • Rheumatologists need to screen axial spondyloarthritis patients for emerging cardiovascular disease and should aim at reducing traditional risk factors like hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking as well as disease activity.

Cardiovascular Disease and Cardiac Imaging in Inflammatory Arthritis

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are more prevalent in inflammatory arthritis (IA) compared to the general population. Recognizing the importance of addressing this issue, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) published guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk management in IA in 2016, with plans to update going forward based on the latest emerging evidence. Herein we review the latest evidence on cardiovascular disease in IA, taking a focus on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondylarthritis, reflecting on the scale of the problem and imaging modalities to identify disease. Evidence demonstrates that both traditional CVD factors and inflammation contribute to the higher CVD burden. Whereas CVD has decreased with the newer anti-rheumatic treatments currently available, CVD continues to remain an important comorbidity in IA patients calling for prompt screening and management of CVD and related risk factors. Non-invasive cardiovascular imaging has been attracting much attention in view of the possibility of detecting cardiovascular lesions in IA accurately and promptly, even at the pre-clinical stage. We reflect on imaging modalities to screen for CVD in IA and on the important role of rheumatologists and cardiologists working closely together.

Benefits of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for cardiovascular disease in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been associated with an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, with current guidelines recommending multiple CVD-related risk assessment strategies. CVD risk prediction using a scoring model with lipids might be another promising alternative, for which ultrasound screening for subclinical atherosclerosis may be considered together with surrogate markers. Theoretically, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), which are known to inhibit endothelial activation and inflammation caused by the disease and underlying metabolic dysfunction, might prevent microvascular events. In this narrative review, we summarized the evidence of TNFi effects on CVD in AS. Although early case reports revealed that CVD occurred during TNFi treatment, more recent evidence shows that it could be successfully treated. Studies of TNFi on lipid changes and subclinical atherosclerosis have shown controversial results, possibly due to genetic predisposition, differences in affinity for membrane-bound TNF leading to insufficient inhibition of inflammation or primary failure response to TNFi, and not enough follow-up time to identify potential significance. Overall, patients vulnerable to CVD could benefit from long-term administration of TNFi when inflammation is under control. Besides healthy lifestyle modification, traditional CVD risk factors and metabolic syndrome-related diseases should be further assessed and treated if necessary.

The Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Current Insights

There is an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), leading to increased CV mortality and morbidity in these patients. The factors that may explain this enhanced CV risk in axSpA are multiple, including traditional CV risk factors such as smoking, but also the inflammatory process and probably the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The CV involvement of axSpA may be detected at an early and pre-clinical stage, using non-invasive techniques. While NSAIDs play a deleterious role in the CV risk of axSpA, TNF inhibitors seem to have a beneficial impact, but this remains to be demonstrated in specific clinical studies. More data are needed to determine the potential effects of IL-17 inhibitors on the CV risk of axSpA. CV comorbidity has been mainly assessed in the radiographic form of axSpA, while limited data are available in patients with the non-radiographic form. The current management of axSpA must consider this CV comorbidity according to the EULAR recommendations. Rheumatologists play a determinant role in the detection of CV risk and current management of these patients is focused on the control of disease activity, suppression of inflammation, screening for and management of traditional CV risk factors, as well as the restriction of NSAID use.

Effect of Biologics on Cardiovascular Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights and Risk Reduction

It is increasingly recognized that atherosclerosis and consequently cardiovascular disease (CVD) are closely linked with inflammatory processes. The latter is in the center of the pathogenic mechanism underlying autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). It follows then, that optimal control of inflammation in ARDs may lead to a decrease of the accompanied CVD risk. Major trials (eg, CANTOS, CIRT), aimed at examining the possible benefits of immunomodulatory treatments in CVD, demonstrated conflicting results. On the other hand, substantial evidence is accumulating about the possible beneficial effects of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with ARDs, particularly those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It seems that bDMARDs (some more than others) alter the lipid profile in RA patients but do not adversely affect, in most cases, the TC/HDL ratio. Favorable effects are noted for arterial stiffness and endothelial function. This is reflected in the lower risk for CVD events, seen in observational studies of RA patients treated with bDMARDs. It should be stressed that more data exist for the TNF-inhibitors than for other bDMARDs, such as tocilizumab, abatacept and rituximab. As regards the spondyloarthropathies (SpA), data are less robust. For TNF-inhibitors, effects appear to be on par with those seen in RA but no conclusions can be drawn for newer biologic drugs used in SpA (eg, IL-17 blockers). Finally, there is accumulating evidence for a beneficial effect of immunosuppressive treatment in cardiac inflammation and function in several ARDs. Introduction of newer therapeutic options in clinical practice seem to have a positive impact on CVD in the setting of ARD. This is probably due to better control of inflammation, but direct improvement in vascular pathology is also a valid hypothesis. Most data are derived from observational studies and, therefore, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the possible favorable effect of bDMARDs on CVD outcomes.

The Dual Role of Platelets in the Cardiovascular Risk of Chronic Inflammation

Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases often exhibit cardiovascular risk. This risk is associated with the systemic inflammation that persists in these patients, causing a sustained endothelial activation. Different mechanisms have been considered responsible for this systemic inflammation, among which activated platelets have been regarded as a major player. However, in recent years, the role of platelets has become controversial. Not only can this subcellular component release pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, but it can also bind to different subsets of circulating lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils modulating their function in either direction. How platelets exert this dual role is not yet fully understood.

Cardiovascular risk in ankylosing spondylitis and the effect of anti-TNF drugs: a narrative review

Introduction: Cardiovascular (CV) mortality is increased in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but little is known about CV morbidity beyond the fact that they have a two-fold higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease than controls due to the inflammatory pattern of the disease itself, and a higher prevalence of traditional CV risk factors than the general population. Anti-TNF drugs reduce inflammation and a number of studies have reported a reduction in sub-clinical atherosclerosis in AS patients treated with anti-TNF drugs, thus suggesting that inflammation contributes to their higher CV risk. Anti-TNF drugs also alter the lipid profiles of AS patients, although these changes may reflect their normalization secondary to inflammation control, and improve their other myocardial alterations.Areas covered: This review concentrates on the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among AS patients and the effect of anti-TNF drugs on this risk, with particular emphasis on the putative causes involved and the aspects that are relevant in clinical practice.Expert opinion: The growing evidence of CV disease in AS means that all clinicians need to know how to prevent it and treat patients appropriately. It is important to bear in mind the EULAR guidelines, which state that a rheumatologist is responsible for monitoring all AS patients for signs of CV involvement because this is essential in order to ensure that they are treated properly. As there is little clinical evidence concerning the effects of biological drugs other than anti-TNF agents, treatment should be decided on the basis of the clinical aspects of the type of AS and the CV co-morbidity: for example, patients who are hypertensive or dyslipidemic should immediately start treatment with an anti-hypertensive agent and/or a statin. All of the patients should be educated to prevent CV events by keeping to a balanced healthy diet, avoiding tobacco smoking, and maintaining normal blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol and glucose levels. Finally, all clinicians (but particularly rheumatologists) should always bear in mind CV complications in order to guarantee that the quality of life of AS patients is as good as possible.

Endothelial dysfunction in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and enhanced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. The mechanisms and mediators of this phenomenon have not been fully explained, but an expanding body of evidence demonstrates that increased cardiovascular risk in AS is heralded by endothelial dysfunction. We performed a literature review using the PubMed database from the year 2006 up to 2018. In this article we review the epidemiology, current evidence for impaired endothelial function, potential mechanisms and markers controlling this dysfunction, and finally we summarize the data regarding the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in reducing endothelial dysfunction in patients suffering from AS.

Anti-TNF Therapy in Spondyloarthritis and Related Diseases, Impact on the Immune System and Prediction of Treatment Responses

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as spondyloarthritis (SpA), psoriasis, Crohn's disease (CD), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain challenging illnesses. They often strike at a young age and cause lifelong morbidity, representing a considerable burden for the affected individuals and society. Pioneering studies have revealed the presence of a TNF-dependent proinflammatory cytokine cascade in several IMIDs, and the introduction of anti-TNF therapy 20 years ago has proven effective to reduce inflammation and clinical symptoms in RA, SpA, and other IMID, providing unprecedented clinical benefits and a valid alternative in case of failure or intolerable adverse effects of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, for RA) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, for SpA). However, our understanding of how TNF inhibitors (TNFi) affect the immune system in patients is limited. This question is relevant because anti-TNF therapy has been associated with infectious complications. Furthermore, clinical efficacy of TNFi is limited by a high rate of non-responsiveness (30–40%) in RA, SpA, and other IMID, exposing a substantial fraction of patients to side-effects without clinical benefit. Despite the extensive use of TNFi, it is still not possible to determine which patients will respond to TNFi before treatment initiation. The recent introduction of antibodies blocking IL-17 has expanded the therapeutic options for SpA, as well as psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. It is therefore essential to develop tools to guide treatment decisions for patients affected by SpA and other IMID, both to optimize clinical care and contain health care costs. After a brief overview of the biology of TNF, its receptors and currently used TNFi in the clinics, we summarize the progress that has been made to increase our understanding of the action of TNFi on the immune system in patients. We then summarize efforts dedicated to identify biomarkers that can predict treatment responses to TNFi and we conclude with a section dedicated to the recently introduced inhibitors of IL-17A and IL-23 in SpA and related diseases. The focus of this review is on SpA, however, we also refer to RA on topics for which only limited information is available on SpA in the literature.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in ankylosing spondylitis: a general population-based study

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), can be life threatening. An increased frequency of VTE has been found in inflammatory conditions. To date, evidence assessing whether this risk is also greater in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is scarce.

Methods

Using the provincial British Columbia, Canada healthcare database that encompasses all residents within the province, we conducted matched cohort analyses of incident PE, DVT and overall VTE among incident cases of AS and compared them with individuals randomly selected from the general population without AS. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) of VTE and multivariable analyses after adjusting for traditional risk factors using Cox models.

Results

Among 7190 incident cases of AS, 35 developed PE and 47 developed DVT. IRs of PE, DVT and overall VTE per 1000 person-years for patients with AS were 0.79, 1.06, 1.56 compared with 0.40, 0.50, 0.77 in the control cohort. Corresponding fully adjusted HRs (95% CI) of PE, DVT and VTE were 1.36 (0.92 to 1.99), 1.62 (1.16 to 2.26) and 1.53 (1.16 to 2.01), respectively. The risks of PE, DVT and VTE were highest in the first year of diagnosis with HR (95% CI) of 2.88 (0.87 to 9.62), 2.20 (0.80 to 6.03) and 2.10 (0.88 to 4.99), respectively.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate an increased risk of VTE in the general AS population. This risk appears the most prominent in the first year after diagnosis.

A role for pericytes in chronic pain?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The importance of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative conditions is becoming increasingly apparent, yet very little is known about these neurovascular functions in nonmalignant disease chronic pain. Neural tissue pericytes play critical roles in the formation and maintenance of the BBB. Herein, we review the important roles of neural pericytes and address their potential role in chronic pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pericytes are implicated in the function of neural microvasculature, including BBB permeability, neuroimmune factor secretion and leukocyte transmigration. In addition, the multipotent stem cell nature of pericytes affords pericytes the ability to migrate into neural parenchyma and differentiate into pain-associated cell types. These recent findings indicate that pericytes are key players in pathological BBB disruption and neuroinflammation, and as such pericytes may be key players in chronic pain states.

SUMMARY

Pericytes play key roles in pathological processes associated with chronic pain. We propose that pericytes may be a therapeutic target for painful diseases that have associated neural vascular dysfunction. Given the paucity of new pharmacotherapies for chronic pain conditions, we hope that this review inspires researchers to unearth the potential role(s) of pericytes in chronic pain sowing the seeds for future new chronic pain therapies.

Comorbidities in Spondyloarthritis

Comorbidities in spondyloarthritis (SpA) add to the burden of disease by contributing to disease activity, functional and work disability, and mortality. Thus, awareness of comorbidities in SpA is crucial to improve their screening and management and to ultimately improve outcomes in those affected. Osteoporosis has been reported to be the most prevalent comorbidity in SpA, and its risk is increased in these patients, compared with the general population; the risk of vertebral fractures requires further evaluation. Cardiovascular risk is also increased in this population, both due to an increase of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors in these patients, but also due to the presence of inflammation. The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in this increased risk needs further elucidation, but there is consensus on the need to encourage smoking cessation and to perform periodic evaluation of cardiovascular risk in these patients, particularly in the case of change in treatment course. Concerning the risk of cancer, no increased risk inherent to SpA seems to exist. However, an increased neoplastic risk can occur due to SpA treatments, e.g., P-UVA. Data are sparse on the risk of infections compared with rheumatoid arthritis, but there appears to be no risk in the absence of TNF-inhibitor exposure. Regardless of which comorbidity, a gap exists between recommendations for their management and actual implementation in clinical practice, suggesting that there is still a need for improvement in this area. Systematic screening for these comorbidities should improve both short- and long-term outcomes in SpA patients.

Osteoprotegerin CGA haplotype protection against cerebrovascular complications in anti-CCP negative patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory disease with high incidence of cardiovascular disease due to accelerated atherosclerosis. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) has been associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic disease in the general population. Several polymorphisms in the OPG gene with functional effects on cardiovascular disease in non-rheumatic individuals have been described. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the effect of three of these functional OPG polymorphisms on the risk of cardiovascular disease in a large and well-characterized cohort of Spanish patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

Three OPG gene variants (rs3134063, rs2073618 and rs3134069) were genotyped by TaqMan assays in 2027 Spanish patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody testing was positive in 997 of 1714 tested. Also, 18.3% of the whole series had experienced cardiovascular events, including 5.4% with cerebrovascular accidents. The relationship between OPG variants and cardiovascular events was assessed using Cox regression.

Results

No association between OPG gene variants and cardiovascular disease was observed in the whole group of rheumatoid arthritis patients or in anti-CCP positive patients. Nevertheless, a protective effect of CGA haplotype on the risk of cardiovascular disease in general, and specifically in the risk of cerebrovascular complications after adjusting for sex, age at disease diagnosis and traditional cardiovascular risk factors was disclosed in anti-CCP negative patients (HR = 0.54; 95%CI: 0.31–0.95; p = 0.032 and HR = 0.17; 95%CI: 0.04–0.78; p = 0.022, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results indicate a protective effect of the OPG CGA haplotype on cardiovascular risk, mainly due to a protective effect against cerebrovascular events in anti-CCP negative rheumatoid arthritis patients.