Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Cross-Culturally Adapted Versions of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for the Lower Extremity

Background

A large number of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed in the English language for various lower extremity orthopaedic pathologies. Twenty different PROMs were recommended for 15 specific musculoskeletal lower extremity pathologies or surgeries. However, the availability of cross-culturally adapted versions of these recommended PROMs is unknown.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the cross-culturally adapted versions of recommended PROMs for individuals experiencing orthopedic lower extremity pathologies or undergoing surgeries, and to identify the psychometric evidence that supports their utilization.

Study design

Literature Review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, SPORTDisucs and Scopus were searched for cross-culturally adapted translated studies through May 2022. The search strategy included the names of the 20 recommended PROMs from previous umbrella review along with the following terms: reliability, validity, responsiveness, psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation. Studies that presented a non-English language version of the PROM with evidence in at least one psychometric property to support its use were included. Two authors independently evaluated the studies for inclusion and independently extracted data.

Results

Nineteen PROMS had cross-culturally adapted and translated language versions. The KOOS, WOMAC, ACL-RSL, FAAM, ATRS, HOOS, OHS, MOXFQ and OKS were available in over 10 different language versions. Turkish, Dutch, German, Chinese and French were the most common languages, with each language having more than 10 PROMs with psychometric properties supporting their use. The WOMAC and KOOS were both available in 10 languages and had all three psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and responsiveness supporting their use.

Conclusion

Nineteen of the 20 recommended instruments were available in multiple languages. The PROM most frequently cross-culturally adapted and translated were the KOOS and WOMAC. PROMs were most frequently cross-culturally adapted and translated into Turkish. International researchers and clinicians may use this information to more consistently implement PROMs with the most appropriate psychometric evidence available to support their use.

Level of evidence

3a.

Validity and Reliability of the Thai Version of the Modified Harris Hip Score for Patients With Hip Abnormalities

Background:

The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is one of the more commonly used patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate and monitor treatment in patients with hip abnormalities and has been translated into several languages.

Purpose:

To develop a Thai version of the mHHS (TH-mHHS) and evaluate the validity and reliability of the measure.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The TH-mHHS was developed using the forward-backward translation method. Patients who presented with hip pain during the first clinic visit completed the Thai version of questionnaires including the mHHS, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (TH-SF36), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (TH-HOOS). The validity between the measures was tested using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The test-retest reliability of the TH-mHHS was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach alpha.

Results:

A total of 64 patients were enrolled who had a mean age of 52.8 ± 16.6 years (range, 17-80 years). There were 64% female and 36% male participants. The TH-mHHS showed a moderate correlation with all subscales of the TH-HOOS and the total TH-HOOS ( r = 0.50-0.65; P < .01) and a high correlation with the physical functioning subscale and physical component summary of the TH-SF36 ( r = 0.73 and 0.75, respectively; P < .01). The test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97; P < .001). The internal consistency was acceptable, with a Cronbach alpha of .71. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.

Conclusion:

The TH-mHHS showed a moderate to high correlation with the TH-SF36 and TH-HOOS, excellent test-retest reliability, and acceptable internal consistency. This measure can be effectively used for evaluating Thai patients with hip disorders, especially an older and arthritic population.

Outcome measures in total hip arthroplasty: have our metrics changed over 15 years?

INTRODUCTION

Consensus has not been reached regarding ideal outcome measures for total hip arthroplasty (THA) clinical evaluation and research. The goal of this review was to analyze the trends in outcome metrics within the THA literature and to discuss the potential impact of instrument heterogeneity on clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search of all manuscripts related to THA from January 2005 to December 2019 was performed. Statistical and linear regression analyses were performed for individual outcome metrics as a proportion of total THA publications over time.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in studies utilizing outcomes metrics between 2005 and 2019 (15.1-29.5%; P < 0.001; R² = 98.1%). Within the joint-specific subcategory, use of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) significantly decreased from 2005 to 2019 (82.8-57.3%; P < 0.001), use of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) significantly increased (0-6.7%; P < 0.001), and the modified HHS significantly increased (0-10.5%; P < 0.001). In the quality of life subcategory, EQ-5D demonstrated a significant increase in usage (0-34.8%; P < 0.001), while Short Form-36 significantly decreased (100% vs. 27.3%; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of outcome-reporting metrics in THA has continued to increase, resulting in added complexity within the literature. The utilization rates of individual instruments have shifted over the past 15 years. Additional study is required to determine which specific instruments are recommended.

Validity and Reliability of the Thai Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool in Young to Middle-Aged Physically Active Adults With Hip Disorders

Background

The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), which is a self-administered questionnaire that contains 33 questions, was developed to evaluate young to middle-aged physically active adults with hip pathology.

Purpose

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the iHOT-33 to create a Thai version of the iHOT-33 (TH-iHOT-33) and to determine the validity and reliability of the TH-iHOT-33.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the iHOT-33 were performed according to international guidelines. Patients aged 18 to 60 years with hip disorders who had a score ≥4 on a modified version of the Tegner activity scale completed the TH-iHOT-33 twice, 2 weeks apart. The Thai versions of the HOOS (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and EQ-5D-5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels) were also completed at baseline. At 2 weeks, the Global Perceived Effect scale was completed in addition to the TH-iHOT-33. The statistical testing for validity included construct validity and hypotheses testing. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error were analyzed to determine reliability.

Results

The iHOT-33 was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted to create the TH-iHOT-33. Seventy-two patients with various hip disorders participated in this study. Of the predefined hypotheses used for construct validity, 86% were confirmed. A Cronbach alpha of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90). The standard error of measurement was 5.1 points. The smallest detectable change was 14.2 points at the individual level and 1.9 points at the group level. The minimal important change was 10.9 points. The TH-iHOT-33 had no observable floor or ceiling effects.

Conclusion

The TH-iHOT-33 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the functional status and health-related quality of life of young to middle-aged physically active Thai adults with hip disorders.

Associations between physicians' global assessment of disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

To determine longitudinal associations between Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Patients attending a rheumatology clinic between 2013 and 2017 completed specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys and rated their global rating of change (GRC) at each visit. PGA, SLEDAI-2K and SLE Flare Index (SFI) were also captured on all visits. Generalised estimating equations (GEE) methods were used to examine longitudinal associations of PGA with PROs and clinical indicators.

RESULTS

337 patients were followed for a median [IQR] of 3.2 [1.6, 3.4] years (2,059 visits). High PGA (>1) was strongly associated with high SLEDAI-2K scores, the presence of flares and poor PROs. Odd ratios (OR) [95% CI] of PGA > 1 in patients with SLEDAI-2K >4 & <10 and SLEDAI-2K ≥10, compared to SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4, were 3.46 [2.36, 5.08], p < 0.001 and 6.39 [4.30, 9.49], p < 0.001, respectively. OR [95% CI] of PGA > 1 in patients with mild-to-moderate or severe flares were 2.09 [1.62, 2.71], p < 0.001 and 4.42 [3.21, 6.07], p < 0.001, respectively. Mental components of both SLEQOL (mood, self-image) and SF36 (MCS) surveys demonstrated significant associations with high PGA. After adjusting for SLEDAI-2K, one-point increase in PGA was associated with reductions in SLEQOL total score and SF36-MCS by 2.33 (regression coefficient (RC) [95% CI] = -2.33 [-3.77, -0.88], p = 0.002), and 4.16 (RC [95% CI] = -4.16 [-5.19, -3.13], p < 0.001) points, respectively. Associations of some physical components (SLEQOL-symptoms, and SF36-PCS) with PGA attenuated when adjusted for SLEDAI-2K. Patients who rated low scores of GRC, which indicate health deterioration, were twice as likely to have PGA > 1 (OR [95%CI] 1.99 [1.25, 3.16], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

High PGA was strongly associated with poor mental health, high disease activity and flares. This study confirms the value of PGA as an efficient assessment tool for SLE.

Locking compression plate fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in patients with preexisting proximal femoral deformity: a retrospective study

Background

To investigate the clinical efficacy of locking compression plate fixation for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in patients with preexisting proximal femoral deformity.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 37 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures combined with preexisting proximal femoral deformity between January 2013 and July 2019. The patients included 24 males and 13 females aged from 23 to 69 years old, with an average age of 47.5 years. The preexisting proximal femoral deformities resulted from poliomyelitis sequela, proximal femoral fibrous dysplasia, malunion and implant failure combined with coxa vara after intramedullary nailing fixation. There were 6 cases of 31-A2.1, 6 cases of 31-A2.2, 20 cases of 31-A3.1, and 5 cases of 31-A3.2, determined based on the AO classification of intertrochanteric fractures. All fractures were managed through open reduction and locking plate fixation. The hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) was used to assess hip function before injury and at the last postoperative follow-up. The short form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire was used to assess quality of life.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months (average, 20.7 months). All patients achieved bone healing within 5.1 months on average (range, 3 to 6 months). Postoperative complications included deep vein thrombosis in three patients, bedsores in one and delayed union in one patient. No other complications, such as surgical site infection, fat embolism, nonunion and re-fracture, were presented. There was no significant difference in the HOOS scores and the SF-36 Health Questionnaire outcomes at pre-injury and at the last postoperative follow-up (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

It is difficult to perform intramedullary fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in patients with preexisting proximal femoral deformity, while locking compression plate fixation is a simple and effective method of treatment.

Polish adaptation and validation of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip replacement

BACKGROUND

The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) is a frequently used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessment of hip disorders and treatment effects following hip surgery. The objective of the study was to translate and adapt the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) into Polish and to investigate the psychometric properties of the HOOS in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement (THR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Polish version of the HOOS was developed according to current guidelines. Patients completed the HOOS, Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the global perceived effect (GPE) scale. Psychometric properties including interpretability (floor/ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC), convergent construct validity (a priori hypothesized Spearman's correlations between the HOOS subscales, the generic SF-36 measure and the VAS for pain) and responsiveness (effect size, association between the HOOS and GPE scores) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 157 patients (mean age 66.8 years, 54% women). Floor effects were found prior to THR for the HOOS subscales Sports and Recreation and Quality of Life. The Cronbach's alpha was over 0.7 for all subscales indicating satisfactory internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was good for the HOOS subscale Pain (0.82) and excellent for all other subscales with ICCs ranging from 0.91 to 0.96. The minimal detectable change ranged from 12.0 to 26.2 on an individual level and from 1.4 to 3.0 on a group level. Seven out of eight a priori hypotheses were confirmed indicating good construct validity. Responsiveness was high since the expected pattern of effect sizes in all subscales was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The Polish version of the HOOS demonstrated good reliability, validity and responsiveness for use in patient groups having THR.

Comparison of performance of specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) health-related quality of life questionnaires and their associations with disease status of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study

Background

The utility of generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is uncertain. We compared the performance of generic (SF36) and specific (SLEQOL) HRQoL surveys by examining their associations with the Global Rating of Change (GRC) and SLE clinical indicators.

Methods

The study included SLE patients who attended a single-center rheumatology clinic between 2013 and 2017. Patients completed both specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) surveys and rated their GRC compared to the previous visit using a 7-point Likert scale on the same day of routine visits. Based on GRC scores, patients’ change in HRQoL was categorized as “no change,” “deterioration,” or “improvement.” Disease activity (SLEDAI-2K), flare, and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were assessed at each visit, and organ damage (SDI) was determined annually. Pairwise correlations between SLEQOL and SF36 components were examined, and associations between GRC status and SLE disease indicators were compared using generalized estimating equations (GEE).

Results

Three hundred thirty-seven patients with 2062 visits were included in the analysis. SLEQOL correlated significantly with SF36. Patients reported improvements in HRQoL in 58%, deterioration in 15%, and “no change” in 27% of all visits. Compared to the “no change” group, mean SF36 and SLEQOL scores were significantly lower in the deterioration group and higher in the improvement group. The magnitude of changes observed with SLEQOL and SF36 in the deterioration and improvement groups was similar. Patients in LLDAS had significantly higher mean scores in both SLEQOL and SF36. In contrast, patients with active disease, especially those with cutaneous, renal, central nervous system, and musculoskeletal activity, had significantly lower SLEQOL and SF36. Flare and organ damage were also associated with lower SLEQOL and SF36-PCS (physical component) but not with SF36-MCS (mental component).

Conclusion

SLEQOL and SF36 similarly describe HRQoL in SLE. Both instruments demonstrated strong associations with GRC-based deterioration or improvement as well as SLE disease status. LLDAS was associated with improved HRQoL.

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to translate the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) into the Polish language, to determine its validity and reliability, and to assess its main psychometric properties. Materials and Methods: A total of 332 hip osteoarthritis (OA) subjects were recruited to the study group and 90 healthy subjects to the control group. The study consisted of the HOOS translation and the assessment of the discriminative power, internal consistency, and the potential floor and ceiling effects followed by the determination of the construct validity and test-retest reliability. The analysis was performed using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and SF-36 questionnaires. Results: The translation process consisted of forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, review, harmonization, and proofreading. The hip OA patients reported a reduced HOOS score when compared to the control subjects. The discriminant validity of the questionnaire was confirmed. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97 was found, indicating a high internal consistency. The HOOS showed a significant correlation with the SF-36 and WOMAC, which ranged from r = −0.93, p-value < 0.05 for WOMAC total score to r = 0.92, and p-value < 0.05 for WOMAC daily living. No floor or ceiling effects were found. A very high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was found (0.93–0.97) for the total score and the individual domains of the HOOS. Conclusions: The Polish HOOS is valid and reliable for evaluating the outcomes of hip OA patients in Poland. This questionnaire may be used with confidence for clinical and research purposes.

Hip complaints differ across age and sex: a population-based reference data for the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Background

The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) is a self-administered hip-specific questionnaire intended to evaluate symptoms and functional limitations, and it is commonly used to evaluate interventions in individuals with hip dysfunction or hip osteoarthritis. The HOOS consists of 43 questions in five subscales: Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living, Function in sport and recreation and Hip-Related Quality of Life. This study aimed to establish population-based reference values for the HOOS and to describe the variation of hip-related symptoms in an adult population.

Methods

The HOOS questionnaire was mailed to 840 individuals aged 18–84 years randomly retrieved from a national population record for the Skåne region of Southern Sweden.

Results

The overall response rate was 67%. Older women and men consistently reported more hip-related complaints than those younger. There were significant differences between the oldest and the youngest age groups in all five subscales in women and men.

Conclusions

Hip-related pain, symptoms, activity of daily life and quality of life varied with age and sex in this population-based cohort. Our findings show the importance of using age- and sex-matched reference values for evaluation of outcomes after interventions due to hip-related problems.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Objective

To create a translated version of the HOOS to fit the Italian population and to test its psychometric properties and validity in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Design

The HOOS Italian version was developed according to published international guidelines that include preparation, forward translation and reconciliation, backward translation, review and harmonization, and proof reading. The Italian HOOS was administered to 145 patients (mean age 65.7 ± 11.6 years, 34–89, 58.6% women) undergoing THA. The following psychometric properties were evaluated: internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha); test-retest reliability (Pearson’s r and intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC); convergent validity (Spearman’s rho between HOOS and SF-36); responsiveness (comparison of pre/post-THA scores, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Interpretability (floor and ceiling effects, skewness and kurtosis indexes) and acceptability (time to compiling, missing answers, and autonomy in compilation) were also evaluated.

Results

Translation and transcultural adaptation were conducted in accordance with the international recommendation. The translation was deemed understandable and appropriate as to the transcultural adaptation. None of the patients reported to have met any difficulties in reading and understanding the HOOS items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good for each HOOS subscale (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.7, Pearson’s r and ICC > 0.80). Convergent validity showed the highest correlations (Spearman’s rho > 0.5) between HOOS and SF-36 subscales relating to similar dimensions. As to responsiveness, all HOOS subscales scores improved significantly after THA (p < 0.01). Interpretability was acceptable despite ceiling effect in post-THA assessment. Acceptability was good: HOOS resulted easy and quick to fill out (12 min on average).

Conclusions

The HOOS was successfully cross-culturally adapted into Italian. The Italian HOOS showed good psychometric properties therefore it can be useful to assess outcomes in OA patients after THA. This study provided a basis for its use within the Italian Arthroplasty Registry and for future clinical trials.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-0935-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessment of reliability, validity, responsiveness and minimally important change of the German Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip

Patient-reported outcome measures are a critical tool in evaluating the efficacy of orthopedic procedures. The intention of this study was to evaluate reliability, validity, responsiveness and minimally important change of the German version of the Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). The German HOOS was investigated in 251 consecutive patients before and 6 months after total hip arthroplasty. All patients completed HOOS, Oxford-Hip Score, Short-Form (SF-36) and numeric scales for pain and disability. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, construct validity and minimal important change were analyzed. The German HOOS demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient values > 0.7. Cronbach´s alpha values demonstrated strong internal consistency. As hypothesized, HOOS subscales strongly correlated with corresponding OHS and SF-36 domains. All subscales showed excellent (effect size/standardized response means > 0.8) responsiveness between preoperative assessment and postoperative follow-up. The HOOS and all subdomains showed higher changes than the minimal detectable change which indicates true changes. The German version of the HOOS demonstrated good psychometric properties. It proved to be valid, reliable and responsive to the changes instrument for use in patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement.