Renal involvement in antiphospholipid syndrome

Metformin in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Investigating Cardiovascular Impact and Nephroprotective Effects in Lupus Nephritis

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by widespread organ inflammation. Metformin, commonly used for diabetes mellitus type 2, has been explored for its anti-inflammatory potential in SLE. This study investigates the association of metformin use on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with SLE.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. We used the multicenter research network (TriNetX) database from 88 health care organizations globally. Patients with SLE aged 18 and above, admitted between January 1, 2014, and April 21, 2024, were included. Propensity score matching compared patients with SLE on metformin with those not on metformin, considering demographics, laboratory results, comorbidities, and baseline medication use. The study assessed outcomes, including lupus nephritis (LN), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at one and five years after SLE diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 9,178 patients with SLE on metformin and 78,983 patients with SLE not on metformin. After propensity score matching, patients with SLE on metformin had higher levels of hemoglobin A1C, whereas patients not on metformin had higher levels of urea nitrogen. When comparing both groups, the risk of developing LN (risk ratio [RR] = 1.70 [1.17-2.41]; P = 0.004), CKD (RR = 1.27 [1.07-1.52]; P = 0.007), and MACEs (RR = 1.21 [1.00-1.46]; P = 0.04) was significantly higher among patients not on metformin at one year after SLE diagnosis. After five years, the risk of LN and CKD was also higher in patients with SLE not on metformin. MACE risk was no longer significant after five years of diagnosis between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE not on metformin have a higher risk of developing LN, CKD, and MACEs compared with patients treated with metformin. Metformin's anti-inflammatory potential offers promise as a complementary therapy for SLE. Nonetheless, further research and clinical trials are needed to clarify its mechanisms, optimal dosage, and long-term effects.

Efforts to Better Characterize "Antiphospholipid Antibody Nephropathy" for the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria: Renal Pathology Subcommittee Report

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) nephropathy (-N) can be challenging to recognize due to a lack of established classification or diagnostic criteria. As part of efforts to develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria (CC), the APS CC Renal Pathology Subcommittee aimed to better characterize the entity of aPL-N.

METHODS

We used a 4-pronged approach that included (1) administering Delphi surveys to worldwide APS physicians to generate aPL-N terminology; (2) conducting a literature review to demonstrate the association of nephropathy with aPL and identify published aPL-N histopathological terminology and descriptions; (3) evaluating aPL-N terminology used in renal biopsy reports from an international patient registry; and (4) evaluating proposed kidney pathologic features for aPL-N by assessment of international Renal Pathology Society (RPS) members.

RESULTS

After completing our metaanalysis demonstrating an association between nephropathy and aPL, we used Delphi surveys, a literature review, and international renal biopsy reports to develop a preliminary definition of aPL-N. The preliminary definition included include specific terms associated with acute (ie, thrombotic microangiopathy in glomeruli or arterioles/arteries) and chronic (ie, organized arterial or arteriolar microthrombi with or without recanalization, organized glomerular thrombi, fibrous and fibrocellular [arterial or arteriolar] occlusions, focal cortical atrophy with or without thyroidization, and fibrous intimal hyperplasia) lesions. Most RPS survey respondents agreed with this terminology and the importance of knowing aPL results for histopathological diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the inclusion of aPL-N in the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology APS CC, and provide the most widely accepted terminology to date for both acute and chronic pathologic lesions of aPL-N.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Renal Allograft Recipients-A Long-Term Multicenter Analysis

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a devastating autoimmune disease and in renal transplant recipients may result in allograft thrombosis or in extra-renal manifestation, mostly venous thromboembolism. There are many non- and immune risk factors affecting renal allograft in recipients with APS. However, renal allograft outcome in recipients with APS without APS nephropathy remains unknown. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess renal allograft function and survival in recipients with APS. Methods: Retrospective, multicenter study included 19 adult renal recipients with definite APS (primary or lupus-related) from three Polish transplant centers. Renal allograft function was assessed using serum creatinine concentration (SCr1) at 3rd month post-transplant and at the end of the observation (SCr2) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated based on modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. General linear model was used to assess 12 month GFR change over time. Kaplan-Meier curves and restricted mean survival time were used for allograft survival. Matched control group consisted of 21 stable renal recipients without history of thrombosis and without anticoagulation/antiplatelet treatment. Results: The study group differs in induction therapy (p = 0.019), high-urgency procedure (p = 0.04), proteinuria (p = 0.0058), primary disease (lupus) (p < 0.0001), re-transplantation in primary APS (p = 0.0046) and shorter time since engraftment to SCr2 (p = 0.016). Primary APS was more often diagnosed post-transplant (p = 0.0005). Allograft biopsy revealed thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with acute rejection (AR) or isolated AR vs AR or chronic rejection in controls but did not reach significance (p = 0.054). Renal allograft function was inferior in the study group but did not reach significance: mean SCr2 (mg/dL) was 2.18 ± 1.41 and 1.5 ± 0.68 in controls, respectively, p = 0.27; mean GFR2 (ml/min/1.73m2) was 39.9 ± 20.83 and 51.23 ± 19.03, respectively, p = 0.102. Renal allograft duration was inferior in patients with APS and was (in years) 11.22 ± 1.44 vs. 14.36 ± 0.42, respectively, p = 0.037, in patients with primary APS (p = 0.021), in patients with APS diagnosed post-transplant (p = 0.012) but not in lupus-related APS (p = ns). Fifteen year renal allograft survival was inferior in APS vs. controls (73,86% vs. 90.48%, respectively, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Recipients with APS are at higher risk for allograft loss due to immune and non-immune causes. Renal allograft survival was inferior in recipients with APS and renal function remains impaired but stable.

Salivary microbiota analysis of patients with membranous nephropathy

The oral microbiota are closely related to human health. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, their relationship with membranous nephropathy (MN) remains unstudied. The saliva microbiota collected from 22 patients with MN and 15 healthy controls were analyzed by next-generation sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was subsequently carried out. The Chao1 and Shannon indices in patients with MN were higher than those in healthy controls. Analysis of similarities revealed that the oral microbiota in the patient group were significantly different from those in the healthy controls. At the genus level, the abundance of Alloprevotella, Granulicatella, Prevotella, Streptococcus and Prevotella_7 was markedly higher in patients with MN than in healthy controls. Six operational taxonomic units (OTUs; OTU5, OTU28, OTU9, OTU15, OTU33 and OTU38) were found to be markedly correlated with the clinical factors creatinine, proteinuria in 24 h, estimated glomerular filtration rate and systolic blood pressure. A total of 28 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways were obtained from the significant OTUs. The oral microbiota of patients with MN were investigated and it was found that OTU5, OTU28, OTU9, OTU15, OTU33 and OTU38 may be used as biomarkers. The present findings may assist in the diagnosis of patients with MN.

Clinicopathological features of cutaneous and renal glomerular vasculopathy in 178 dogs

BACKGROUND

One hundred seventy-eight dogs with cutaneous and renal glomerular vasculopathy (CRGV) were evaluated to further the understanding of the natural course of CRGV. CRGV, a form of thrombotic microangiopathy, can cause skin lesions and potentially acute kidney injury (AKI) with a high mortality rate.

METHODS

Cases were submitted from multiple practices from 2012 until June 2019. Clinical histories and laboratory data were reviewed to describe the features of CRGV.

RESULTS

Most cases (91%) occurred between November and May. Fifteen dogs (8.4%) with CRGV were in contact with another dog that developed skin lesions +/- AKI. Limb lesions were present on 144 dogs (80.9%) at presentation. Median time from appearance of a lesion to AKI was 3 days (range -4-45 days). Neurological signs occurred in 33 dogs (18.6%) including at presentation in 2 (1.1%). Systemic signs were present in 13 dogs prior to a skin lesion (7.3%). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed prior to AKI identification in 92 of 170 dogs (54.1%). Thrombocytopenia was present in 115 of 137 (83.9%) of dogs.

CONCLUSION

The timeframe over which AKI may develop is longer than previously reported, neurological signs can be identified at presentation or during hospitalisation, and thrombocytopenia is even more common than previously reported.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based review

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can occur as a primary disease or secondary to an underlying disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, or other systemic autoimmune diseases. Catastrophic APS refers to a rapid progression of the disease with the development of thrombotic events that affect three or more organs. This is the case of a 22-year-old woman without history of pregnancy. She developed a catastrophic APS associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, with kidney damage (focal lupus nephritis III), pulmonary embolism, and Libman-Sacks mitral valve endocarditis. Accurate diagnosis and optimal medical treatment (anticoagulants, corticosteroids, antimalarials, diuretics) improved her disease, and the patient was discharged in good clinical condition and continues her multidisciplinary follow-up in the outpatient clinic of our institution.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in end-stage renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between autoimmune hemolytic anemia and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome has never been systematically addressed.

METHODS

Systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed databases performed according to PRISMA guidelines from inception to March 2020; meta-analysis performed by Peto's odds ratio for rare events.

FINDINGS

Forty-five studies with different outcomes met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence (PP) of IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) positivity was greater in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than controls (20.2% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.001, I²  >80%; I² = heterogeneity), particularly in hemodialysis patients (18.3% vs. 8%, I² = 0%). The PP of lupus anticoagulant was greater in ESRD than controls (8.7% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.0001, I² = 0%). The standardized mean difference of IgG aCL favored ESRD rather than controls (P < 0.0001, I² =97%). The PP of fistula occlusion was greater in IgG aCL-positive patients than negative patients (39% vs. 27%, I² =97%); the PP of IgG aCL positivity was greater in patients with fistula occlusion than without fistula occlusion (26.9% vs. 23.2%, P = 0.01, I² =72%); the same applied to the PP of lupus anticoagulant positivity (23% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.0001, I² = 0%). The standardized mean difference of IgG aCL favored fistula occlusion (P = 0.004, I² = 91%).

DISCUSSION

Lupus anticoagulant relates to ESRD regardless of management whereas IgG aCL relates specifically to ESRD on hemodialysis, but only lupus anticoagulant associates with fistula occlusion. The expression of aPL as patients positive for aPL rather than as titers precludes further assumptions on the relationship.

Anaesthetic considerations for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombotic autoimmune disorder that is clinically characterized by the development of thrombosis and obstetric morbidities in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Due to hypercoagulability, the focus of management is anticoagulation for the prevention of thrombosis and its recurrence. When such patients undergo surgery, however, the underlying risk of thrombosis increases as a result of anticoagulant withdrawal, immobilization, and/or intimal injury. Conversely, there is also an increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopaenia, possible disseminated intravascular coagulation, or progression to catastrophic APS, as a result of excessive anticoagulation, surgery, and infection. Measures for appropriate perioperative anticoagulation are discussed in this review, as well as anaesthetic considerations for preventing perioperative complications in patients with APS undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Nephropathy and Other Thrombotic Microangiopathies Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and other causes of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) negatively impact the renal outcomes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. Here we review the diagnosis and management of occlusive renal vascular lesions due to APS and other TMAs, with a focus on patients with SLE and lupus nephritis. The presence of a thrombotic event, unexplained hypertension, thrombocytopenia, or hemolytic anemia should prompt consideration for TMA syndromes. The differential diagnosis of a TMA in a patient with SLE includes APS, thrombocytopenic purpura, complement-mediated or infection-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome, drug-mediated TMA (particularly due to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity), and malignant hypertension. Treatment of APS with a documented thrombotic event focuses on anticoagulation to reduce the risk for further thrombotic events. Treatment of classic presentations of thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome in the SLE population is the same as in patients without SLE. Treatment of APS nephropathy or TMA when it is diagnosed by biopsy with concomitant lupus nephritis presents a challenge to clinicians because there is no clear standard of care. Small and retrospective studies suggest potential benefit of complement inhibition, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition, B cell depleting therapy, and plasma exchange therapy for patients with lupus nephritis and TMA, and prospective investigation of these therapies should be a research priority.