Real-life data on tapering or discontinuation of canakinumab therapy in patients with familial Mediterranean fever

Canakinumab treatment real world evidence in 3 monogenic periodic fever syndromes in 2009-2022: an interim analysis using the French JIR cohort database

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to provide real-world evidence on the treatment patterns, effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in France in Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), Mevalonate Kinase Deficiency (MKD), and Tumor necrosis factor Receptor Associated Periodic Syndrome (TRAPS).

METHODS

This study used the JIR cohort, a multicentre international registry created in 2013 to collect data on patients with juvenile inflammatory rheumatic diseases. French patients diagnosed with FMF, MKD or TRAPS and treated with canakinumab were included in this study.

RESULTS

31 FMF, 26 MKD and 7 TRAPS patients received canakinumab during the study period. Most of them initiated canakinumab at the recommended dose of 2 mg/kg or 150 mg, but less than half of FMF and MKD patients initiated it at the recommended frequency (every 4 weeks). Two years after initiation, the rate of patients still on treatment was 78.1% in FMF, 73.7% in MKD, and 85.7% in TRAPS patients. While the dose per injection remained globally the same over the course of the treatment, some adjustments of the dose intervals were observed. Six patients had a severe adverse event reported. Of those, three were possibly related to canakinumab.

CONCLUSION

This interim analysis showed a good maintenance of canakinumab treatment 2 years after initiation and confirmed its safety profile in real-life practice in France in patients diagnosed with FMF, MKD and TRAPS. The high variety of dose and interval combinations observed in canakinumab treated patients let suppose that physicians adapt the posology to individual situations rather than a fixed treatment plan.

A score for predicting colchicine resistance at the time of diagnosis in familial Mediterranean fever: data from the TURPAID registry

OBJECTIVES

Colchicine forms the mainstay of treatment in FMF. Approximately 5-10% of FMF patients are colchicine resistant and require anti-IL-1 drugs. We aimed to compare the characteristics of colchicine-resistant and colchicine-responsive patients and to develop a score for predicting colchicine resistance at the time of FMF diagnosis.

METHODS

FMF patients (0-18 years) enrolled in the Turkish Paediatric Autoinflammatory Diseases (TURPAID) registry were included. The predictive score for colchicine resistance was developed by using univariate/multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 3445 FMF patients [256 (7.4%) colchicine-resistant and 3189 colchicine-responsive) were included (female:male ratio 1.02; median age at diagnosis 67.4 months). Colchicine-resistant patients had longer, more frequent attacks and were younger at symptom onset and diagnosis (P < 0.05). Fever, erysipelas-like erythema, arthralgia, arthritis, myalgia, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, chest pain, comorbidities, parental consanguinity and homozygosity/compound heterozygosity for exon 10 MEFV mutations were significantly more prevalent among colchicine-resistant than colchicine-responsive patients (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis in the training cohort (n = 2684) showed that age at symptom onset, attack frequency, arthritis, chest pain and having two exon 10 mutations were the strongest predictors of colchicine resistance. The score including these items had a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 49.1%. In the validation cohort (n = 671), its sensitivity was 93.5% and specificity was 53.8%.

CONCLUSION

We developed a clinician-friendly and practical predictive score that could help us identify FMF patients with a greater risk of colchicine resistance and tailor disease management individually at the time of diagnosis.

Is it possible to extend the dose interval of canakinumab treatment in children with familial Mediterranean fever? PeRA group experience

BACKGROUND

There is no clear data on the optimal duration of treatment with anti-interleukin-1 drugs in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever patients, as well as on the dose interval. This study aimed to assess patients whose canakinumab dose interval was adjusted according to a specific protocol, with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing this protocol for the patient care.

METHODS

The files of 45 patients whose canakinumab treatment interval was opened with a standard protocol previously determined by the Delphi method were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Canakinumab treatment was initiated once a month for all patients. In the sixth month of canakinumab treatment, a dose interval extension was introduced; however, 7 patients (15.5%) experienced an attack, and consequently, no further interval extension was administered to them. For 29 patients, the dose interval was successfully extended to once every three months, as they remained attack-free for a year after the first interval extension. Nine patients continued receiving the drug every 2 months, as they had not yet completed one year since the first extension. The study found no significant correlation between experiencing an attack during the dose interval extension protocol and the number, duration of attacks, or autoinflammatory diseases activity index score.

CONCLUSION

Extending treatment intervals with canakinumab in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever shows promise for favorable outcomes.

Feasibility of canakinumab withdrawal in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever

OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus on canakinumab treatment tapering and discontinuation strategies in colchicine-resistant FMF patients. In this study, we aimed to establish a treatment management and discontinuation protocol in paediatric FMF patients treated with canakinumab.

METHODS

Fifty-eight FMF patients treated with canakinumab were included. Since 2020, we have applied a protocol based on our experience whereby canakinumab is administered monthly in the first 6 months, followed by bimonthly for 6 months, and a final period of every 3 months (for 6 months). The patients were divided into two groups: 2012-2019 (group A) and 2020-2022 (group B).

RESULTS

In group A (n = 33), the median duration of canakinumab treatment was 2.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.9-3.7]. A total of 25 of 33 patients discontinued canakinumab after a median of 2.1 years (IQR 1.8-3.4). In two patients, canakinumab was restarted because of relapse. In group B (n = 25), canakinumab was discontinued in 18 patients at the end of 18 months. After a median follow-up of 0.8 years (IQR 0.6-1.1), two patients had a relapse and canakinumab treatment was reinitiated. The remaining 16 patients still have clinically inactive disease and are receiving only colchicine. When we compared the characteristics between groups A and B, there were no significant differences regarding demographics, clinical features, and outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study in the literature suggesting a protocol for discontinuing canakinumab in paediatric FMF patients. It was possible to discontinue canakinumab successfully in more than half of the patients in 18 months. Thus we suggest that this protocol can be used in paediatric FMF patients.