The relation of psychological status and type D personality with central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis: everything is in your mind!

People with osteoarthritis have a higher component of neuropathic pain as compared to those with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study

Neuropathic pain may be present in a proportion of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its presence may lead to the requirement of altered management approaches in these conditions. This study investigated the prevalence of neuropathic pain in OA as compared to that in RA. Patients with OA and RA were included cross-sectionally if they had no other known neuropathic disorder. The PainDETECT questionnaire was used to assess neuropathic pain. WOMAC and CDAI scores were used to assess disease severity in OA and RA respectively. 69 patients with OA with a mean WOMAC score of 53.30 ± 16.39 and 98 patients with RA with a mean CDAI of 25.48 ± 16.99 were compared. The median PainDETECT score for OA was 13 (0-30) and RA was 5 (0-37) [p<0.001]. 15 patients with OA and six patients with RA were highly likely to have neuropathic pain, while 15 patients with OA and 30 patients with RA were classified as possibly having neuropathic pain. Thus, the proportion of patients free from neuropathic pain was higher in the RA group (63.3%) than in the OA group (39.1%) [p = 0.003]. Both the prevalence and the severity of neuropathic pain were significantly higher in OA than in RA. These findings suggest that neuropathic pain is an important factor in OA, as in RA, and must be considered in management as well as in future research in both these conditions.

Incidence and prognostic factors of residual back pain in patients treated for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common consequence of osteoporosis and can significantly impact the quality of life for affected individuals. Despite treatment options such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, many patients continue to experience residual back pain (RBP) even after the fracture has healed. The incidence of RBP after OVCF treatment varies among studies, and there is a need for further research to understand the risk factors associated with RBP.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched, and relevant studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Statistical analysis included single-proportion meta-analyses and pooling of odds ratios (OR) using the inverse-variance method, to calculate the overall incidences of RBP and cement leakage and identify risk factors associated with RBP.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included in the analysis. The overall incidences of RBP and cement leakage were found to be 16% and 18%, respectively. Several risk factors were identified, including gender, bone mineral density, depression, baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score, intravertebral vacuum cleft, number of fractured segments, cement distribution, history of vertebral fracture, thoracolumbar fascial injury, and fracture non-union.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides potential value within the scope of the incidence and risk factors of RBP following treatment of OVCFs. The identified risk factors can help clinicians identify high-risk patients and tailor appropriate interventions. Future research should focus on standardizing the definition of RBP and patient selection criteria to improve the accuracy of estimates and facilitate better management strategies for OVCF patients.

Evaluation of the segmental distribution of pain sensitivity among patients with central sensitization associated with chronic subacromial pain syndrome: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Pain sensitivity is the main finding of central sensitization (CS) and can occur in patients with chronic shoulder pain. However, there is limited evidence concerning the distribution of pain sensitivity in shoulders, forearms, and legs in patients with CS associated with chronic shoulder pain. The present study aimed to determine the distribution of pain sensitivity in patients with CS associated with chronic subacromial pain syndrome (SPS).

METHOD

This cross-sectional study included 58 patients with chronic SPS and CS (patient group) and 58 healthy participants (control group). The presence of CS was determined using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). To determine the distribution of pain sensitivity, pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements were performed from the shoulders, forearms, and legs.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sociodemographic data (p > 0.05). The patient group had a significantly higher CSI score (p < 0.001) and lower PPTs in all regions (p < 0.05) than the control group. Unlike the control group, the patient group had lower PPTs on the affected side for the shoulder [mean difference (MD) 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2 (-1.7 to -0.6)], forearm [MD 95% CI: 1.1 (-1.7 to -0.6)], and leg [MD 95% CI: 0.9 (-1.4 to -0.3)] compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pain sensitivity is more pronounced in the affected shoulder and the forearm and leg located on this side than in those on the contralateral side in patients with CS associated with chronic SPS.

Central sensitization: its prevalence and impact on quality of life among hemodialyzed patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Data on the role of central sensitization in hemodialyzed patients are scarce. The aim was to identify the impact of central sensitization on quality of life and elucidate the risk factors for the development of central sensitization in patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

Central sensitization, quality of life, psychological well-being, and sleep were assessed by the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on quality of life and the predictors of the development of central sensitization were assessed by regression analyses.

RESULTS

The frequency of central sensitization was 48% in the study population (n = 100). Patients with central sensitization had significantly higher pain intensity, worse sleep quality, and more impaired psychological status (p < 0.05 for all). The CSI score negatively affected all quality of life domains on its own (p < 0.001 for all, adjusted R2 ranged from 0.17 to 0.47). Dialysis vintage (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.0), pain (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0), JSS (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5), and HADS-total (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.2) were determined as the independent risk factors for central sensitization (p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that given the high frequency of central sensitization and its significant negative impact on quality of life, the presence of central sensitization should be investigated in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Central sensitization significantly deteriorates functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in primary Sjögren's syndrome

BACKGROUND

Central sensitization has a major role in health-related parameters in musculoskeletal conditions. There is still a lack of understanding regarding the impact of central sensitization on the interpretation of disease activity and functional disability in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS).

METHODS

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was used to screen for central sensitization. Disease-related parameters, including objective tests, medication use, the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), and the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), were assessed. Functionality, quality of life, sleep, and mental health were evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on functionality and disease activity measures was assessed by regression analyses.

RESULTS

The frequency of central sensitization was 65% in patients with pSS (n = 60). Patients with central sensitization had higher HAQ-DI, ESSPRI, HADS, and JSS and lower SF-36 subdomain scores (p < 0.05 for all). A significant positive correlation was observed between the CSI score and the ESSPRI, JSS, HAQ-DI, and HADS scores (Spearman's rho ranging from 0.342 to 0.739). The multiple regression analysis indicated that CSI was independently associated with HAQ-DI (adjusted R2 = 0.19, B = 0.01) and ESSPRI (adjusted R2 = 0.45, B = 0.08) (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that central sensitization has a major impact on functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in pSS. When devising strategies for the management of patients with pSS, it is crucial to consider these close relationships. Key Points • The frequency of central sensitization accompanying primary Sjögren's syndrome is considerable. • Central sensitization was independently associated with functionality and self-reported disease activity assessment. • This close association leads to challenges in functionality, evaluating treatment response, and planning or switching between therapies in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

The effect of balance exercises on central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of balance exercises on functional status, pain, balance, and central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients diagnosed with bilateral Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 2 primary knee OA and associated central sensitization were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups. Both groups were provided with verbal and written information on knee OA. In addition, the intervention group received a supervised balance exercise program for 6 weeks, 3 days a week on alternating days. The outcome measures were the changes in the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Berg Balance Scale, and Y Balance Test. Evaluations were performed at baseline, immediately after treatment (6th week) and at 12th week. The study included 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. At the end of the treatment period (6th week), the improvement in CSI score, WOMAC pain, WOMAC physical function, WOMAC total score, Y Balance Test scores, and VAS pain during activity was significantly greater in the intervention group than that in the control group (p < 0.001). Regarding the changes from baseline to the 12th week, the intervention group experienced greater improvement in most of the outcome measures. Yet, the change in WOMAC pain score, Berg Balance Scale score, and VAS pain at rest was similar between the study groups (p = 0.05, p = 0.257, and p = 0.385, respectively). A two-model multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the changes in VAS pain (during activity) after the treatment and at follow-up [(p = 0.004, adjusted R2: 0.346) and (p = 0.002, adjusted R2: 0.391), respectively], as well as changes in WOMAC pain from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.020, ΔR2 = 0.245) significantly affected central sensitization. However, changes in Y Balance Test and WOMAC total scores did not appear to have a significant impact on the improvement in central sensitization (p > 0.05). Balance exercises may provide improvement in central sensitization, functional status, and dynamic balance among patients with knee OA. The improvement in central sensitization depends mostly on the pain relief effect of balance exercises.