Microglandular adenosis of the breast in a BRCA1 mutation carrier: radiological features

Luminal-Type Invasive Carcinoma in Association With Microglandular Adenosis/Atypical Microglandular Adenosis: A Case Report and Molecular Comparison

Microglandular adenosis (MGA) is a proliferative breast lesion composed of small, uniform glands lacking a myoepithelial cell layer while still invested by the basement membrane. The glands percolate haphazardly through the breast parenchyma rather than maintaining a lobular architecture, typical of other forms of adenosis.MGA is a benign lesion though atypical forms have been well described, often in close association with carcinoma. MGA, atypical MGA (AMGA), and the vast majority of MGA-associated carcinomas (MGACA) are negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) by immunohistochemistry. In light of these findings and early molecular studies, MGA is hypothesized to represent a clonal process and nonobligate precursor of basal-type breast carcinomas. We present the case of a 58-year-old woman and the first published molecular comparison of a luminal-type invasive ductal carcinoma with its associated MGA/AMGA. Analysis of small nucleotide variants (SNVs) revealed that 63% of the SNVs identified in the MGA were present in the AMGA while only 10% of them were present in the MGACA, suggesting a direct relationship between MGA and AMGA but not MGA and MGACA.

Small Glandular Proliferations of the Breast With Absent or Attenuated Myoepithelial Reactivity by Immunohistochemistry: A Review Focusing on the Differential Diagnosis and Interpretative Pitfalls

CONTEXT

-Small glandular proliferations of the breast encompass a variety of benign, atypical, and malignant lesions that show some overlapping morphologic features. Myoepithelial stains are frequently used in the workup of these lesions in order to rule out or establish a diagnosis of invasive carcinoma. Some benign lesions show absent or diminished myoepithelial staining, and may represent an interpretative pitfall, particularly in small core biopsy samples.

OBJECTIVE

-To review small glandular proliferations of the breast that show absent or diminished staining with myoepithelial immunohistochemical markers.

DATA SOURCES

-The study comprised a review of published literature and clinical case material.

CONCLUSIONS

-The interpretation of myoepithelial stains in small glandular proliferations of the breast can, on some occasions, represent a challenge in diagnosing these lesions. Recognition of the key histopathologic features and immunohistochemical staining patterns of the entities in the differential diagnosis is crucial in their workup.

Small Glandular Proliferations of the Breast

This article discusses the most common small glandular proliferations, namely sclerosing lesions (sclerosing adenosis and radial scar), tubular carcinoma, and epithelial displacement after needle core biopsy, as well as less common entities, such as low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, microglandular adenosis, and syringomatous adenoma. Due to significant morphologic overlap, these entities are easily mistaken for one another. The similarities and differences among these lesions in their clinicopathologic features, radiologic findings, and immunohistochemical profiles are emphasizesd.