Evaluation of temporal windows for coronary artery bypass graft imaging with 64-slice CT

Comparative analysis between 64- and 320-slice spiral computed tomography in the display of coronary artery stents and diagnosis of in-stent restenosis

The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of 64-multi-slice spiral computed tomography (64-MSCT) and 320-MSCT in the display of coronary artery stents and diagnosis of in-stent restenosis. The data collected from the 64- and 320-MSCT coronary angiography of 93 patients following coronary artery stent implantation were retrospectively analyzed. The 64-MSCT group comprised 30 cases with 57 stents and the 320-MSCT group comprised 63 cases with 93 stents. The image quality, heart rate of the patients and the radiation effective dose (ED) they were subjected to, were compared. Furthermore, the diagnostic abilities of 64-and 320-MSCT coronary angiography for in-stent restenosis were evaluated using invasive coronary angiography results as the gold standards. Statistically significant differences were observed in the heart rate and ED of the patients from the two groups (P<0.05), but no significant difference was identified in the accuracy index (P>0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of the 64-MSCT group were found to be 100% (7/7), 93.94% (31/33), 77.78% (7/9), 100% (31/31) and 95% (38/40), respectively, and those in the 320-MSCT group were found to be 100% (16/16), 95.89% (70/73), 84.21% (16/19), 100% (70/70) and 96.63% (86/89), respectively. The present findings suggest that both 64-MSCT and 320-MSCT can be used for follow-up and curative effect evaluation following coronary stent implantation; however, 320-MSCT has fewer requirements of the patients' heart rate and uses a lower radiation dose.

Optimal reconstruction interval in dual source CT coronary angiography: a single-center experience in 285 patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the visibility of coronary arteries and bypass-grafts in patients who underwent dual source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography without heart rate (HR) control and to determine optimal intervals for image reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 285 consecutive cases who underwent coronary (n=255) and bypass-graft (n=30) DSCT angiography at our institution were identified retrospectively. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Ten datasets in 10% increments were reconstructed in all patients. On each dataset, the visibility of coronary arteries was evaluated using the 15-segment American Heart Association classification by two radiologists in consensus.

RESULTS

Mean HR was 76±16.3 bpm, (range, 46-127 bpm). All coronary segments could be visualized in 277 patients (97.19%). On a segment-basis, 4265 of 4275 (99.77%) coronary artery segments were visible. All segments of 56 bypass-grafts in 30 patients were visible (100%). Total mean segment visibility scores of all coronary arteries were highest at 70%, 40%, and 30% intervals for all HRs. The optimal reconstruction intervals to visualize the segments of all three coronary arteries in descending order were 70%, 60%, 80%, and 30% intervals in patients with a mean HR <70 bpm; 40%, 70%, and 30% intervals in patients with a mean HR 70-100 bpm; and 40%, 50%, and 30% in patients with a mean HR >100 bpm.

CONCLUSION

Without beta-blocker administration, DSCT coronary angiography offers excellent visibility of vascular segments using both end-systolic and mid-late diastolic reconstructions at HRs up to 100 bpm, and only end-systolic reconstructions at HRs over 100 bpm.

Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings

BACKGROUND

There is a high probability for presence of irregular heart rates and artifacts in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Previously reported diagnostic performance of ECG-gated 64-slice dual-source computer tomography angiography (CTA) in this patient group is based on pre-selection for normal heart rate and routine clinical setting.

PURPOSE

To investigate image quality and diagnostic performance of CTA in patients with previous CABG surgery in various clinical settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-six non-selected, consecutive patients (110 grafts, 44 arterial, 66 venous) with previous CABG surgery were prospectively examined using a dual-source 64-slice CT (Siemens Definition, Forchheim, Germany) without utilization of CT-related pharmaceutical heart rate control. Patients were stratified according to the clinical setting: planned redo-cardiac surgery; emergency CTA within 30 days after CABG surgery; routine follow-up after CABG surgery. A reference standard was available for 30 patients (53.6%; 67/110 grafts). Image quality, artifacts, and graft patency were independently assessed by two observers.

RESULTS

All CTAs were diagnostic despite the presence of irregular heart rhythm (25% of cases) and artifacts (72.7% of grafts). CTA was accurate in all patient groups in assessing graft patency (97.9% sensitivity; 100% specificity; 98.5% accuracy) but artifacts decreased diagnostic performance for stenosis detection (60% sensitivity; 88.6% specificity; 84.1% accuracy). Arterial grafts exhibited more surgical clip artifacts compared to venous grafts, which predominantly showed motion artifacts. Overall diagnostic quality was rated excellent in 70.9%/56.4%, good in 23.4%/39.1%, and sufficient in 5.5%/4.5% by each observer, respectively. CTA detected acute findings in 10 cases (graft bleeding, graft occlusion, pericardial hematoma, sternal instability with retrosternal abscess formation, pericardial effusion, left ventricle thrombus) in the emergency group; seven cases required surgical revision.

CONCLUSION

Dual-source CTA is a robust and accurate method for assessment of graft patency and detection of relevant extra-cardiac pathologies in a non-selected patient population after CABG surgery in routine as well as emergency clinical settings. Artifacts caused by irregular heart rhythm or surgical clips do not impair graft patency evaluation but limit stenosis assessment.

Infant cardiac CT angiography with 64-slice and 256-slice CT: comparison of radiation dose and image quality using a pediatric phantom

Background

The aims of this study were to investigate the image quality and radiation exposure of pediatric protocols for cardiac CT angiography (CTA) in infants under one year of age.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Cardiac CTA examinations were performed using an anthropomorphic phantom representing a 1-year-old child scanned with non-electrocardiogram-gated (NG), retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated helical (RGH) and prospectively electrocardiogram-gated axial (PGA) techniques in 64-slice and 256-slice CT scanners. The thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used for direct organ dose measurement, while dose-length product and effective mAs were also used to estimate the patient dose. For image quality, noise and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) were assessed based on regions-of-interest drawn on the reconstructed CT images, and were compared with the proposed cardiac image quantum index (CIQI). Estimated dose results were in accordant to the measured doses. The NG scan showed the best image quality in terms of noise and SNR. The PGA scan had better image quality than the RGH scan with 83.70% dose reduction. Noise and SNR were also corresponded to the proposed CIQI.

Conclusions/Significance

The PGA scan protocol was a good choice in balancing radiation exposure and image quality for infant cardiac CTA. We also suggested that the effective mAs and the CIQI were suitable in assessing the tradeoffs between radiation dose and image quality for cardiac CTA in infants. These results are useful for future implementation of dose reduction strategies in pediatric cardiac CTA protocols.

Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice CT angiography to assess coronary artery bypass grafts--comparison of image quality and radiation dose

Objective

In this retrospective non-randomized cohort study, the image quality and radiation dose were compared between prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated axial (PGA) and retrospectively ECG-gated helical (RGH) techniques for the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts using 256-slice CT.

Methods

We studied 124 grafts with 577 segments in 64 patients with a heart rate (HR) <85 bpm who underwent CT coronary angiography (CTCA); 34 patients with RGH-CTCA and 30 patients with PGA-CTCA. The image quality of the bypass grafts was assessed by a 5-point scale (1 = excellent to 5 = non-diagnostic) for each segment (proximal anastomosis, proximal, middle, distal course of graft body, and distal anastomosis). Other objective image quality indices such as noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were assessed. Radiation doses were also compared.

Results

Patient characteristics of the two groups were well matched except HR. The HR of the PGA group was lower than that of the RGH group (62.0±5.0 vs. 65.7±7.4). For both groups, over 90% of segments received excellent or good image quality scores and none was non-evaluative. The image quality generally degraded as graft segment approached to distal anastomosis regardless of techniques and graft types. Image quality scores of the PGA group were better than those of the RGH group (1.51±0.53 vs. 1.73±0.62; p<0.001). There was no significantly difference of objective image quality between two techniques, and the effective radiation dose was significantly lower in the PGA group (7.0±1.2 mSv) than that of the RGH group (20.0±4.6 mSv) (p<0.001), with a 65.0% dose reduction.

Conclusions

Following bypass surgery, 256-slice PGA-CTCA is superior to RGH-CTCA in limiting the radiation dose and obtaining better image quality for bypass grafts.

Diagnostic performance of 320-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) in the evaluation of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) served as the standard of reference, using a quantitative approach.

Methods

CTA studies were performed using CT equipment with 320 detector-rows, each 0.5 mm wide, and a gantry rotation time of 0.35 s. All grafts, recipient and nongrafted vessels were deemed interpretable or uninterpretable. The presence of significant (≥50%) stenosis and occlusion were determined on vessel and patient basis. Results were compared to ICA using quantitative coronary angiography.

Results

A total of 40 patients (28 men, 76 ± 15 years), with 89 grafts, were included in the study. On a graft analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values in the evaluation of significant stenosis were 96%, 92%, 83% and 98% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of recipient and nongrafted vessels was 89% and 80%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of graft, recipient and nongrafted vessel occlusion was 96%, 92% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

320-slice CTA allows accurate non-invasive assessment of significant graft, recipient vessel and nongrafted vessel stenosis in patients with prior CABG.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in evaluating coronary artery bypass grafts and of the native coronary arteries

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the assessment of occlusions and stenoses of arterial and venous bypass grafts and disease progression in the native vessels distal to the graft, and to compare the results with those of conventional coronary angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 78 individuals (45 men, 33 women; mean age 59) and evaluated 213 bypass grafts using a 64-slice MDCT scanner. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography with a mean time interval between the two examinations of 2 days.

RESULTS

One patient was excluded due to arrhythmia during the examination. The 212 bypass grafts in the remaining 77 patients (98.7%) consisted of 115 (54%) venous grafts and 97 (46%) arterial grafts. In the 115 venous grafts, MDCT showed a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100% in evaluating occluded grafts and a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 98.4% and accuracy of 96.9% in evaluating significant stenoses. In evaluating occluded arterial grafts, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity 100% and accuracy 98.9%, whereas in evaluating stenoses of arterial grafts, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 97.7% and accuracy 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in evaluating native coronary vessels distal to the graft allow for a complete assessment of the surgical and native circulation. The examination appears therefore to be exhaustive in ruling out or confirming the presence of diseased vessels in the postoperative follow-up.

Low dose high-pitch spiral acquisition 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess electrocardiography (ECG)-synchronized dual-source computed tomography (CT) in high-pitch spiral acquisition mode for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency regarding image quality and radiation dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients (47 men, age 69.6 +/- 9.6 years, body mass index 26.6 +/- 3.5 kg/m) underwent clinically indicated 128-slice dual-source CT angiography of the entire thorax for the evaluation of graft patency after CABG surgery using a prospectively ECG-synchronized high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (pitch 3.2; 100 kV tube voltage, 0.28 seconds gantry rotation time). Heart rates (HR) were noted. Image quality of the proximal anastomosis, graft body, distal anastomosis, and postanastomotic coronary artery were graded by 2 independent readers on a 3-point scale (1 = excellent, 2 = moderate, and 3 = poor/nondiagnostic). Quantitative image quality parameters (noise, contrast-to-noise ratio) were measured. Effective radiation doses were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean HR was 76 +/- 19 bpm (range, 45-135 bpm). Median scan time was 0.9 seconds (range, 0.76-1.17 seconds), mean scan length was 349 +/- 38 mm (range, 294-452 mm). A total of 125 CABG (54% arterial grafts) and 465 vessel sections were analyzed. Twelve grafts were proximally occluded. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 462 (99.4%) sections. Of those, image quality was excellent in 397 (85.4%) and moderate in 65 (14.0%). All 3 (0.6%) nondiagnostic sections affected the distal anastomosis due to motion artifacts caused by high HR. Separating the study population by the median HR of 71 bpm, image quality of the distal anastomosis regarding motion artifacts was significantly lower at high HR (P < 0.05). Interobserver agreement in grading image quality of graft segments was good (kappa = 0.77). Image noise in the aorta was 36.9 +/- 8.1, contrast-to-noise ratio was 13.1 +/- 4.2. Effective radiation dose was 2.3 +/- 0.3 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

The patency of coronary artery bypass grafts can be assessed with decreasing image quality at high HR in high-pitch prospectively ECG-synchronized thoracic 128-slice dual-source CT angiography at a low radiation dose.