MR features of ectopic pregnancy

Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery

Objective

We aimed to determine the safety of Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in terms of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) concept for tubal pregnancy surgery and provide a detailed process of vNOTES for tubal pregnancy surgery, including experience and key points for surgeons performing this procedure.

Methods

The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), which was conducted in Chengdu, China. A total of 219 patients who underwent tubal ectopic pregnancy surgery between September 2021 and March 2022. The patients underwent salpingectomy or salpingostomy using transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) or vNOTES, according to their preferences. This study prospectively collected perioperative and one-year follow-up data on tubal pregnancy outcomes after vNOTES and compared them with those after LESS.

Results

The vNOTES group showed a shorter surgical duration, hospitalization duration, and postoperative exhaust time and a lower analgesic medication usage rate, but it showed a higher surgical conversion rate. The vNOTES approach reduced the postoperative exhaust time by approximately 9 h (95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.93, -5.57 h, p < .001) and the risk of postoperative analgesic drug use by 77% (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.61, p = .023).

Conclusion

vNOTES can shorten the exhaust time and duration of hospitalization, reduce postoperative pain, and avoid surface surgical scars in tubal pregnancy surgeries, consistent with the ERAS concept. However, more comprehensive preoperative evaluation of patients who choose vNOTES is required to reduce the occurrence of intraoperative conversion.Trial registration: ChiCTR2100053483.

Endometriosis MR mimickers: T1-hyperintense lesions

Endometriosis is a chronic and disabling gynecological disease that affects women of reproductive age. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the cornerstone radiological technique for both the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. While MRI offers higher sensitivity compared to ultrasonography, it is prone to false-positive results, leading to decreased specificity. False-positive findings can arise from various T1-hyperintense conditions on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, resembling endometriotic cystic lesions in different anatomical compartments. These conditions include hemorrhage, hyperproteic content, MRI artifacts, feces, or melanin. Such false positives can have significant implications for patient care, ranging from incorrect diagnoses to unnecessary medical or surgical interventions and subsequent follow-up. To address these challenges, this educational review aims to provide radiologists with comprehensive knowledge about MRI criteria, potential pitfalls, and differential diagnoses, ultimately reducing false-positive results related to T1-hyperintense abnormalities.Critical relevance statementMRI has a 10% false-positive rate, leading to misdiagnosis. T1-hyperintense lesions, observed in the three phenotypes of pelvic endometriosis, can also be seen in various other causes, mainly caused by hemorrhages, high protein concentrations, and artifacts.Key points• MRI in endometriosis has a 10% false-positive rate, leading to potential misdiagnosis.• Pelvic endometriosis lesions can exhibit T1-hyperintensity across their three phenotypes.• A definitive diagnosis of a T1-hyperintense endometriotic lesion is crucial for patient management.• Hemorrhages, high protein concentrations, lipids, and artifacts are the main sources of T1-hyperintense mimickers.

Nanomedicines for Improved Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Narrative Review

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) - the implantation of an embryo outside of the endometrial cavity, often in the fallopian tube - is a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and leading cause of maternal death due to hemorrhage in first trimester. Current diagnostic modalities including human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) quantification and ultrasonography are effective, but may still misdiagnose EP at initial examination in many cases. Depending on the patient's hemodynamic stability and gestational duration of the pregnancy, as assessed by history, hCG measurement and ultrasonography, management strategies may include expectant management, chemotherapeutic treatment using methotrexate (MTX), or surgical intervention. While these strategies are largely successful, expectant management may result in tubal rupture if the pregnancy does not resolve spontaneously; MTX administration is not always successful and may induce significant side effects; and surgical intervention may result in loss of the already-damaged fallopian tube, further hampering the patient's subsequent attempts to conceive. Nanomaterial-based technologies offer the potential to enhance delivery of diagnostic imaging contrast and therapeutic agents to more effectively and safely manage EP. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of nanomedicine technology dedicated to its potential to improve both the diagnosis and treatment of EP.

Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn: multicenter's MRI features of a rare condition

PURPOSE

To describe the MRI features of rudimentary horn pregnancy (RHP) with surgical correlations.

METHODS

Nine women with a RHP underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. MRI protocol included T2- (n = 9), T1- (n = 7), and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences (n = 4). Two pelvic radiologists retrospectively analyzed MR images to assess the following MRI features: presence of a myometrium around the gestational sac (GS) and characteristics of its wall, GS surrounded by myometrium in contact with the round ligament, communication of the GS with the endometrial cavity of the main horn, continuity of the GS with the cervix, fibrous or muscular GS attachment to the main horn, lateral deviation, and endometrial thickness of the main horn. Ovaries and tubes were also assessed. MRI features were correlated with surgical findings.

RESULTS

Seven of the nine women [29 ± 6 SD years (range 16-37 years)] underwent surgical management. The first US diagnosed RHP in only 1/9 patients. All pregnancies were diagnosed using MRI. RHP was all located in the rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus. All the GS was surrounded by myometrium in contact with the round ligament. None of the RHP displayed communication with the endometrial cavity of the main horn nor with the cervix. An attachment between the RHP and the main horn was seen in 3/9 patients. All the main horns were lateralized and empty.

CONCLUSION

MRI diagnosed RHP in all patients by identifying the GS surrounded by myometrium in contact with the round ligament and the absence of continuity between the GS and the cervix.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-retrospective study.

Unruptured ovarian ectopic pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review

In clinical practice, ovarian pregnancy is extremely rare and is always found to be ruptured. A definitive diagnosis for ruptured ovarian pregnancy is difficult to obtain. We present two cases of unruptured ovarian pregnancies detected during laparoscopy and review existing literature to better understand the clinical characteristics of ectopic pregnancies in this rare site. Intrauterine devices, assisted reproductive technology, and intrauterine operations are all high-risk factors in ovarian pregnancy. Moreover, menopause, abdominal pain, and vaginal bleeding are clinical manifestations. Ovarian pregnancy can be diagnosed using serum hCG, transvaginal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Laparoscopy is the treatment of choice for ovarian pregnancy. It is recommended that the intact gestational sac be excised and the ovarian function be protected to the greatest extent possible during the operation. More definitive diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy must be reported in order to gain a better understanding of ovarian pregnancy.

Using MRI to differentiate upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy for the patients with pregnancies in the uterotubal junction during the first trimester

Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI for the uterotubal junctional pregnancies during the first trimester.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 59 patients (January 2016 to July 2021) with a preoperative imaging diagnosis of uterotubal junctional pregnancy. Using operative and pathological reports as the reference standard, we identified 22 patients with upper-lateral intracavitary (angular) pregnancy and 37 patients with interstitial pregnancy. Two senior radiologists, blinded to the patients’ information, reviewed the MRI images and determined each MRI feature based on the original interpretation criteria. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion to achieve a consensus. The sensitivity and specificity of each MRI feature were calculated according to the reference standard.

Results

The endometrial thickness in the upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy group was larger than in the interstitial group (p = 0.001). The cutoff value of the endometrial thickness was 11.5 mm with a sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve that were 77.3%, 64.9%, and 0.743, respectively. Two key features to diagnose upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy were “medial free edge” and “medial free edge plus above-cutoff endometrial thickness.” The sensitivity and specificity of the medial free edge were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the medial free edge plus above-cutoff endometrial thickness were 77.3% and 100%, respectively. The key feature to diagnose interstitial pregnancy was an “intact lateral junctional zone,” of which the sensitivity and specificity were 94.6% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

MRI can be used to differentiate the upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy during the first trimester.

Key Points

• We demonstrated MRI diagnostic criteria for the interstitial pregnancy and upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy.

• MRI might be used to identify the complex interstitial pregnancies, those with a gestational sac protruding into the uterine cavity.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Conventional MRI for Patients With Ectopic Pregnancy

Objective

To assess the utility of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy.

Summary of background data

Most cases of ectopic pregnancy are tubal pregnancies. Preoperative accurate diagnosis including the location of the tubal pregnancy is important.

Method

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study evaluating patients who underwent surgery for ectopic pregnancy from April 2004 to March 2016 and who underwent preoperative MRI. Sixty patients were enrolled in the study. Chorion confirmed at the tubal pregnancy site detected by MRI was defined as a correct diagnosis.

Results

Mean estimated gestational age at the time of MRI according to the last menstrual period was 7 weeks (median: 5 weeks; range: 3–10 weeks). Ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed by MRI in 57 cases, and all cases were either left or right tubal pregnancy. In 52 cases, the actual position matched the MRI findings. In 5 cases, the location of tubal ectopic pregnancy was different from that diagnosed by MRI, or no tubal pregnancy was observed intraoperatively. In 2 cases, no ectopic pregnancy site was observed on MRI, but tubal pregnancy was confirmed by surgery. In one case, an ectopic pregnancy site was not found, and the tube showed normal findings on MRI. The sensitivity of MRI diagnosis was 96.2%, specificity was 16.7%, positive predictive value was 91.1%, and negative predictive value was 33.3%.

Conclusion

In cases of ectopic pregnancy treated surgically, the sensitivity of MRI diagnosis, including identification of the location of ectopic pregnancy, is high.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Value-Added Review

ABSTRACT

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a known cause of maternal mortality and may be misdiagnosed in up to 50% of pregnant female individuals (Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(1):10-17). Magnetic resonance imaging, with its superior soft tissue resolution, is a valuable alternative diagnostic modality to diagnose EP when transvaginal ultrasound results are inconclusive. Although an extrauterine gestational sac is the most specific finding, there are other key MRI findings that can aid in diagnosing EP. As availability of MRI access in the emergency department setting increases across the nation, its utility in women with a positive pregnancy test has also increased. Specific MRI findings that are diagnostic of EP include absence of intrauterine pregnancy, adnexal mass separate from the ovary, and hemoperitoneum. In addition, intrauterine ectopic locations, especially intramural, cornual, and cervical pregnancies, can be diagnosed with increased accuracy with the help of MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging is also useful in excluding potential mimics of EP, including adnexal cysts, ovarian neoplasms, and fibroids. In summary, providing an accurate diagnosis and determining the precise location of an EP, which is supported by the use of MRI, is imperative for guiding a patient's treatment to prevent a potentially fatal outcome.

Heterotopic pregnancy: a case report

Background

Heterotopic pregnancy describes the occurrence of two pregnancies in different implantation sites simultaneously, which is rare, yet it is a challenge to diagnose such a problem due to complex clinical and laboratory findings. In the current study, we present a case of first trimester heterotopic pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and was managed successfully.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old primigravida lady with spontaneous pregnancy was presented by increasing lower abdominal pain for 5 days with brownish vaginal discharge, nausea, and vomiting episodes. Trans-abdominal and endovaginal ultrasound was performed and revealed a viable intrauterine pregnancy of 8 weeks and 1 day, associated with a heterogeneous complex right adnexal mass. MR imaging revealed a right adnexal mass intimately anterior to the normal right ovary. Laparascopy was done; it revealed a distended right fallopian tube with pregnancy while the right ovary was not seen (impeded in the pouch of Douglas), and right salpingectomy was done. The specimen was sent for histopathology. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was then taken to the recovery room in stable condition. The histopathological report confirmed the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Conclusion

However, heterotopic is a rare condition, any pregnant woman presenting with alarming abdominal pain and adnexal abnormality; heterotopic pregnancy should be among the differential diagnosis possibilities. The patient should be thoroughly investigated using ultrasound and MRI if needed, to exclude this rare diagnosis and allow on-time proper management.

Two Cases of Ectopic Pregnancy Mimicking Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

A well-known typical feature of ectopic pregnancy is an evident gestational sac structure outside of the uterus. However, some cases show atypical appearance that is described as a heterogeneous hypervascular mass. We report two cases of ectopic pregnancy that presented heterogeneous findings mimicking gestational trophoblastic diseases but were correctly diagnosed as ectopic pregnancies on MRI. The first case was an interstitial pregnancy in which the patient underwent surgical treatment. The second case was a cesarean scar pregnancy that was treated conservatively but showed spurious enlargement of pregnancy-related lesions after the treatment. Both cases lacked myometrial invasion on MRI, and the patients were diagnosed with ectopic pregnancies. Invasive findings on MRI may discriminate ectopic pregnancy from trophoblastic tumors and avoid unnecessary hysterectomy.

Investigation of clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

AIM

To investigate whether contrast-enhanced (CE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves identification of implantation site of ectopic pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 63 patients in whom implantation sites had been confirmed at histopathology. Two expert radiologists for gynaecological imaging and two inexpert radiologists independently reviewed non-CE MRI and a combination of non-CE and CE-MRI (non-CE+CE-MRI), then determined implantation site with a confidence level. The following MRI features were also evaluated: extrauterine gestational sac (GS)-like structure (shape, signal intensities at T1-weighted imaging [WI], T2WI, and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], presence of the three rings appearance, and distinct low intensity areas at T2WI, presence of tree or dot-like components, degree of contrast enhancement), fallopian tube (dilatation, dilatation with haematoma, degree of contrast enhancement, enhanced components within the tube), and ascites. These findings were compared for non-CE and non-CE+CE-MRI data, and for expert and inexpert groups.

RESULTS

The expert group identified implantation sites correctly in 58/63 (92%) cases for non-CE and non-CE+CE-MRI. In the inexpert group, the correct identification was improved from 54/63 (86%) using non-CE MRI to 58/63 (92%) using non-CE+CE-MRI, but was not significant (p=0.29). In comparison between non-CE and non-CE+CE-MRI, dilation of the fallopian tubes was observed more frequently (p=0.004) and the confidence level was elevated significantly in the non-CE+CE-MRI (p<0.0001) in the inexpert group. Intergroup comparison revealed that confidence level was significantly higher in the expert group than in the inexpert group using non-CE MRI (p<0.0001), although the difference was not significant at non-CE+CE MRI (p=0.49).

CONCLUSION

CE-MRI did not significantly improve correct identification of ectopic pregnancy implantation sites, although the addition of contrast enhancement did enable inexpert radiologists to diagnose confidently.

Magnetic resonance imaging of tubal ectopic pregnancy: correlation with intraoperative findings

Ectopic pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy that occurs outside of the uterine cavity (ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2018 [1]). Ectopic pregnancy is occasionally diagnosed with MRI. Particularly, when ultrasound is nondiagnostic, it is essential that radiologists are able to recognize findings of ectopic pregnancy on MRI in the emergent setting. This novel case report demonstrates specific MR imaging signs recently proposed in the literature to help identify a tubal gestational sac, the most common type of ectopic pregnancy, and is the first reported case demonstrating intraoperative correlation with MRI findings of tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Utility of MRI in Management of a Rare Case of Unilateral Dichorionic-Diamniotic Twin Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy

Twin tubal ectopic pregnancies are rare events but critical diagnoses to make in emergency settings. They are common in patients who received in vitro- fertilization and in those with history of PID. Unless 2 embryos are live with detectable heart beats, ultrasound cannot definitely diagnose twin tubal EP. In clinically stable patients, MRI may provide other concrete findings to establish the diagnosis and lead to better management. In literature, to best of our knowledge, there has been no reported case of twin tubal EP evaluated with MRI. In this article, we have briefly reviewed the role of MRI in different types of EP and its limitations. We report an interesting case of ruptured tubal twin EP diagnosed with MRI which was sub optimally evaluated with ultrasound.

Pregnancy of unknown location: Evaluation and management

Early diagnosis of an extrauterine pregnancy is important for safe and effective management. However, a pregnancy's location often cannot be easily determined with abnormal implantations or prior to 5-6 weeks' gestation. Multiple testing strategies exist to diagnose an abnormal pregnancy when location is unknown, but caution needs to be used to avoid a false diagnosis. Medical treatment is optimal when an abnormal pregnancy is diagnosed early. Because most of these pregnancies are intrauterine, additional testing to localize the pregnancy will allow the correct choice of therapy and avoids unnecessary exposure to a toxic therapy. This testing strategy should be reserved for patients with significant concern for ectopic pregnancy, based on either risk factors or clinical findings. Overuse of this approach can lead to interruption of normal pregnancies.

Magnetic resonance imaging of common, uncommon, and rare implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To review the MRI appearances of tubal and non-tubal implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal ultrasound is the primary imaging modality in ectopic pregnancy and MRI is used as a problem-solving tool in selected indications as detailed in the article. MRI features of tubal, interstitial, cervical, cesarean scar, cornual, ovarian, abdominal, and heterotopic pregnancies are provided to familiarize the radiologists with their appearances thereby assisting them in making early and accurate diagnosis.

Embarazo ectópico cervical: diagnóstico preciso y enfoque de manejo médico. Reporte de caso

<p>El embarazo ectópico cervical es una condición exótica. Su diagnóstico y manejo plantean un desafío importante, dada su asociación con desenlaces maternos graves. La sospecha clínica y la juiciosa aplicación de los criterios diagnósticos permiten establecer modalidades de terapia conservativa. Este artículo reporta un caso de embarazo ectópico cervical con diagnóstico de imágenes de ultrasonido y resonancia nuclear magnética en el que se administró tratamiento con metotrexato. El seguimiento clínico, de los exámenes paraclínicos y de ultrasonido mostraron la resolución completa de la condición. Se revisan aspectos relacionados con el diagnóstico y tratamiento.</p>

To evaluate the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting unusual site ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of pelvic MRI in the diagnosis of unusual ectopic pregnancy (EP), when ultrasound (US) examination is inconclusive.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 150 patients with suspected EP. Clinical, US and MRI features of 15 unusual EPs were analysed. Two radiologists independently reviewed each case resolving by consensus any diagnostic discrepancy. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the Cohen κ test.

RESULTS

MRI displayed a gestational sac-like structure surrounded by a thick wall in all cases. The thick wall displayed hyperintensity in 41 %, isointensity in 35 % and hypointensity in 24 % of cases on T1-weighted images. Diffusion- and fat saturation T1-weighted images were the most accurate sequences, as they enabled identification of 15/15 and 14/15 patients, respectively. Although US was false negative in detecting cervical and uterine infiltration underlying the caesarean scar, MRI was able to identify the invasion. Interobserver agreement was very good for all sequences (κ=0.892-1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI plays an important role in the early diagnosis of unusual EP. It should be considered after negative US findings, providing accurate evaluation of the site and the possible infiltration of these lesions, which help in the management of these patients.

KEY POINTS

• MRI is being increasingly used as a problem-solving modality in ectopic pregnancy. • MRI plays an important role in early diagnosis of unusual ectopic pregnancy. • Knowledge of MRI features in EP is essential to determinate appropriate management.

Spontaneous uterine cornual rupture at 26 weeks' gestation in an interstitial heterotopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization

Interstitial implantation in a heterotopic pregnancy is extremely rare, and despite currently available diagnostic modalities, early identification of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy remains difficult. This report describes a case of spontaneous cornual rupture at 26 weeks' gestation in a woman with diamniotic dichorionic twins that resulted in live births. The patient had previously undergone laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy, and the pregnancy was conceived with in vitro fertilization. Interstitial implantation in a heterotopic pregnancy can go unrecognized, resulting in increased maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:322-325, 2016.

Non-oncologic applications of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the genitourinary system

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has become an increasingly used tool in abdominal and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), primarily in the oncologic setting. DWI sequences are being added to routine MRI protocols at many institutions, and as its use has spread, more non-oncologic applications have been explored. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of DWI applications in inflammatory, infectious, autoimmune-mediated, and ischemic processes affecting the genitourinary system.

Magnetic resonance imaging - A troubleshooter in obstetric emergencies: A pictorial review

The application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pregnancy faced initial skepticism of physicians because of fetal safety concerns. The perceived fetal risk has been found to be unwarranted and of late, the modality has attained acceptability. Its role in diagnosing fetal anomalies is well recognized and following its safety certification in pregnancy, it is finding increasing utilization during pregnancy and puerperium. However, the use of MRI in maternal emergency obstetric conditions is relatively limited as it is still evolving. In early gestation, ectopic implantation is one of the major life-threatening conditions that are frequently encountered. Although ultrasound (USG) is the accepted mainstay modality, the diagnostic predicament persists in many cases. MRI has a role where USG is indeterminate, particularly in the extratubal ectopic pregnancy. Later in gestation, MRI can be a useful adjunct in placental disorders like previa, abruption, and adhesion. It is a good problem-solving tool in adnexal masses such as ovarian torsion and degenerated fibroid, which have a higher incidence during pregnancy. Catastrophic conditions like uterine rupture can also be preoperatively and timely diagnosed. MRI has a definite role to play in postpartum and post-abortion life-threatening conditions, e.g., retained products of conception, and gestational trophoblastic disease, especially when USG is inconclusive or inadequate.

Non-neoplastic diseases of the fallopian tube: MR imaging with emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVE

We illustrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of non-neoplastic tubaric conditions.

BACKGROUND

A variety of pathologic non-neoplastic conditions may affect the fallopian tubes. Knowledge of their imaging appearance is important for correct diagnosis. With recent advances in MRI, along with conventional MR sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences are available and may improve lesion characterization by discriminating the nature of the content of the dilated tube. Tubal fluid with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and no restricted diffusion on DWI is indicative of hydrosalpinx. Content with high signal intensity on T1-weighted images and restricted diffusion on DWI is suggestive of hematosalpinx associated with endometriosis or tubal pregnancy. A dilated tube with variable or heterogeneous signal intensity content on conventional MR sequences and restricted diffusion on DWI may suggest a pyosalpinx or tubo-ovarian abscess. We describe morphological characteristics, MR signal intensity features, enhancement behaviour and possible differential diagnosis of each lesion.

CONCLUSION

MRI is the method of choice to study adnexal pelvic masses. Qualitative and quantitative functional imaging with DWI can be of help in characterization of tubaric diseases, provided that findings are interpreted in conjunction with those obtained with conventional MRI sequences.

TEACHING POINTS

• Nondilated fallopian tubes are not usually seen on MR images. • MRI is the method of choice to characterize and localize utero-adnexal masses. • MRI allows characterization of lesions through evaluation of the fluid content's signal intensity. • DWI in conjunction with conventional MRI sequences may improve tissue characterization. • Pelvic inflammatory disease is the most common tubal pathology.

A Case of Ovarian Pregnancy Diagnosed by MRI

Ovarian pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, causing a great diagnostic challenge. We report a case of ovarian pregnancy in a 42-year-old woman, in whom MRI successfully demonstrated the implantation in the ovary. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed an echogenic mass in the right ovary but failed to demonstrate tubal pregnancy. T2-weighted MR images disclosed a gestational sac structure in the right ovary, which exhibited heterogeneous high intensity intermingled with punctate foci of distinct low intensity. MRI may be a useful tool for diagnosing ovarian pregnancy, by demonstrating a gestational sac in the ovary.

Endosonography of benign myometrium cysts and cyst-like lesions

INTRODUCTION

Many pathological causes are responsible for the sonographic presentation of myometrium cysts and cyst-like lesions, where the distinction between these etiologies is required.

THE AIM OF THE WORK

The current work is aimed at discerning between different etiologies of myometrium cysts and cyst-like lesions for an optimum management.

METHODOLOGY

In the course of daily practice of gynecological transvaginal ultrasound, 66 cases of myometrium cysts and cyst-like lesions have been discerned, where all were examined with endovaginal ultrasound using a multifrequency endocavitary probe having color Doppler capability.

RESULTS

Adenomyosis uteri detected in 15 cases, invasive mole in 4 cases, congested arcuate veins in 20 cases, incidental cysts in 4 cases, cystic degeneration of myoma in 3 cases, C-section scar cysts and cyst-like lesions in 13 cases, interstitial ectopic pregnancy in 2 cases, incomplete abortion with congested myometrium vessels in 4 cases, and arteriovenous malformation in 1 case. The number of cases with cervical nabothian cysts was not considered since they were too frequent.

CONCLUSION

Endosonography is an important tool in differentiating between the various diseases that are responsible for benign myometrium cysts and cyst-like lesions, which are all important since some of them are visualized as serious clinical situations and others turn out to be of little clinical significance.

Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and management of unruptured interstitial pregnancy

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis and management of suspicious unruptured interstitial pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Only patients with unruptured interstitial pregnancy evaluated by MRI and observed for at least a year after surgery were included. Initial evaluation was performed by measurement of serum β-human chorionic gonadotrophin level and ultrasonography. In suspicious cases, emergency MRI was performed to diagnose interstitial pregnancies with the exclusion of rudimentary horn pregnancy and angular pregnancy. Three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) angiography was additionally performed if the uteroplacental neovascularization needed to be evaluated. Then, management procedures were individually determined along with the need for preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for immediate devascularization, and for the local or systemic administration of methotrexate. Either laparoscopic cornuostomy or cornual resection was chosen to excise the gestational mass.

RESULTS

Five consecutive women with unruptured interstitial pregnancy were enrolled. One case each of rudimentary horn pregnancy and angular pregnancy was excluded. Three-dimensional CT angiography was performed in three cases due to increased vascular flow on color Doppler ultrasonography. Preoperative devascularization by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed in two cases, in which a prominent neovascularized gestational mass was identified. Uterine preservation was achieved by cornuostomy or cornual resection in all cases. Two patients with a desire to become pregnant conceived spontaneously thereafter, followed by successful cesarean birth.

CONCLUSION

This small case series emphasizes that precise localization of gestational products in the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube by MRI can facilitate the minimally invasive management of unruptured interstitial pregnancy for uterine preservation.

Magnetic resonance imaging of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy

Evaluation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy presents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and radiologists alike. The differential diagnosis includes obstetric and nonobstetric conditions unique to pregnancy, in addition to causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain unrelated to the pregnancy. The clinical presentation and course of disease may be altered in pregnancy, and several pathologies are exacerbated by pregnancy. Discriminating clinical features in the diagnosis of abdominal and pelvic pain are often confounded by expected anatomic and physiologic changes in pregnancy. Moreover, while diagnostic pathways may be altered in pregnancy, the necessity for a timely and accurate diagnosis must be underscored, as delay in treatment may result in an undesirable increase in morbidity and/or mortality for both the patient and fetus. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) through faster acquisition and motion-insensitive techniques, coupled with increased awareness and education regarding the value of MRI in diagnosing a wide range of pathology, have established MRI as a valuable strategy in the investigation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in the pregnant patient. This review presents a practical approach to common obstetric and nonobstetric causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain during pregnancy, as well as safety considerations for performing MRI in this patient population.

Endometriosis coexisting with mature cystic teratoma in the same ovary and ectopic pregnancy of left fallopian tube: a rare coexistence

A coexistence of endometriosis and mature cystic teratoma in the same ovary is a rare occurrence although such tumors of ovaries are said to be common in the reproductive age group. We report a case of fimbrial ectopic pregnancy combined with simultaneous ipsilateral ovarian presentation of endometriosis and mature teratoma.

A rare case of chronic ectopic pregnancy presenting as large hematosalpinx

Ectopic pregnancy is defined as implantation and subsequent development of an embryo outside the uterine lining. It has wide range of presentation from acute hemoperitoneum to chronic ectopic pregnancy. This is an unusual case of chronic ectopic pregnancy with large hematosalpinx without classical symptoms. A 22-year-old South Indian woman reported to the outpatient clinic with irregular spotting for a duration of 2 months which was not associated with pain. There was no preceding amenorrhea and previous menstrual cycles were regular. Clinically, the patient was hemodynamically stable but severely anemic. The abdomen was soft on palpation, cervical movements were not tender, and human chorionic gonadotropin was absent in the urine. Ultrasound revealed a complex adnexal mass. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large hematosalpinx. Laparoscopic left salpingectomy was conducted and histopathology confirmed ectopic pregnancy. Ectopic pregnancy presents diagnostic dilemmas in the absence of classical symptoms. MRI and laparoscopy are important tools in such a diagnostic dilemma.

Ectopic pregnancy: a review

PURPOSE

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) presents a major health problem for women of child-bearing age. EP refers to the pregnancy occurring outside the uterine cavity that constitutes 1.2-1.4 % of all reported pregnancies. All identified risk factors are maternal: pelvic inflammatory disease, Chlamydia trachomatis infection, smoking, tubal surgery, induced conception cycle, and endometriosis. These developments have provided the atmosphere for trials using methotrexate as a non-surgical treatment for EP. The diagnosis measure of EP is serum human chorionic gonadotropin, urinary hCGRP/i-hCG, progesterone measurement, transvaginal ultrasound scan, computed tomography, vascular endothelial growth factor, CK, disintegrin and metalloprotease-12 and hysterosalpingography. The treatment option of EP involves surgical treatment by laparotomy or laparoscopy, medical treatment is usually systemic or through local route, or by expectant treatment.

RESULTS

It was concluded that review data reflect a decrease in surgical treatment and not an actual decline in EP occurrence so that further new avenues are needed to explore early detection of the EP.

MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review

Because of its lack of ionizing radiation and excellent soft-tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is being increasingly used in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in the pregnant patient. Roughly 2% of all pregnancies are ectopic. Although ectopic pregnancy is usually diagnosed on the basis of a combination of clinical, laboratory, and ultrasonographic findings, it occasionally is initially identified at MR imaging. Thus, it is imperative that the radiologist should be familiar with the variable appearance of ectopic pregnancy at MR imaging and should evaluate for ectopic pregnancy at any time when (a) a patient has positive results of a pregnancy test and (b) an intrauterine pregnancy is not definitively seen. Because of potential issues of fetal safety, a conservative approach should be used for MR imaging in pregnancy. An MR imaging protocol for the evaluation of possible appendicitis in pregnant women is detailed. Specific findings that can aid in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy are the lack of an intrauterine pregnancy, isolated hemoperitoneum, tubal masses, hematosalpinx, and interstitial masses. In the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy, consideration should be given to the more unusual forms of ectopic pregnancy, such as angular pregnancy, cornual pregnancy, and abdominal pregnancy. Potential mimics of ectopic pregnancy include placental abnormalities, ovarian neoplasms, and corpus luteum cysts.

Daughter cyst sign

The daughter cyst sign is a specific indicator of an uncomplicated ovarian cyst and pathologically represents a stimulated ovarian follicle. This finding must be differentiated from an ectopic pregnancy in a patient who has the potential to become pregnant. We report an uncomplicated ovarian cyst in a 3-year-old female with McCune-Albright syndrome and precocious puberty mimicking an ectopic pregnancy.

Diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the first trimester of pregnancy: a case report

Heterotopic pregnancy is a condition characterized by implantation of one or more viable embryos into the uterine cavity while another one is implanted ectopically, particularly into the uterine tube. Its occurrence has increased drastically over the last few years due to assisted reproduction procedures. In general, the diagnosis is made during the first trimester by using endovaginal two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS), through observing a complex para- or retrouterine mass in association with a viable uterine pregnancy. However, under some conditions such as atypical ultrasonographic presentations, 2DUS does not clarify the situation whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis is able to do so. We present the case of a pregnant woman in her fifth pregnancy, with a clinical condition of lower abdominal pain and pallor. Endovaginal 2DUS showed a complex voluminous mass in the left pelvic region in association with a viable intrauterine pregnancy. 2DUS in power Doppler mode showed “ring” vascularization, compatible with an ectopic gestational sac. MRI was of great importance in that it suggested that the mass had hematic content, which together with the clinical features, indicated that laparotomy should be performed. This surgical choice was essential for the woman to achieve a clinical improvement and for good continuation of the intrauterine pregnancy.

Use of magnetic resonance analysis for clinical evaluation of the peripheral area of gestational sac in bleeding and non-bleeding ectopic pregnancy cases

Purpose

To evaluate preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of bleeding and non-bleeding ectopic pregnancy (EP) by comparison with surgical findings.

Methods

Eighteen suspected EP cases underwent preoperative MR imaging. We classified 8 cases as the bleeding group and 7 cases as the non-bleeding group with or without intra-abdominal bleeding and/or hematoma at the site of EP, and compared, retrospectively, gestational sac (GS)-like structure, particularly the peripheral area of the GS via MR analysis. Excluded were 3 cases that were insufficient for assessing extrauterine GS-like structure: ruptured tubal pregnancy and uterine horn pregnancy.

Results

GS-like structures were typically observed as low intensity on T1-weighted image (T1WI) and as high intensity on T2-weighted image (T2WI). In non-bleeding cases, most peripheral areas of the GS were of intermediate intensity on T1WI and high intensity on T2WI. Most bleeding cases were of high intensity on T1WI and low to high intensity on T2WI. Furthermore, the peripheral area of the GS was of higher intensity on T1WI with fat suppression than on T1WI.

Conclusions

It is clear that MR imaging is effective for diagnosis of cases of suspected EP. EP conditions may be predicted by signal intensity of the peripheral area of the GS via MR analysis.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy

The investigation of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy is challenging. The use of ultrasound may be limited due to the patient's change in body habitus and computed tomography is not desirable due to fetal irradiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has thus become increasingly popular in the evaluation of such patients, due to its lack of ionizing radiation, multiplanar capability and high contrast resolution. This review will detail the MRI technique required to image the pregnant abdomen and describe the MRI features of common causes of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy.