Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: differential diagnosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

A Bi-modal Temporal Segmentation Network for Automated Segmentation of Focal Liver Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate an automated deep learning-based model for focal liver lesion (FLL) segmentation in a dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) video.

METHODS

In this multi-center and retrospective study, patients with FLL who underwent dynamic CEUS exam were included from September 2021 to December 2021 (model development and internal test sets), and from March 2023 to May 2023 (external test sets). A bi-modal temporal segmentation network (BTS-Net) was developed and its performance was evaluated using Dice score, intersection over union (IoU) and Hausdorff distance, and compared against several segmentation methods. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were obtained automatically from BTS-Net and manually de-lineated by an experienced radiologist, and evaluated by intra-class correlation and Pearson correlation co-efficients. Multiple characteristics were analyzed to evaluate the influencing factors of BTS-Net.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients (160 men, median age 56 y) with single FLL were enrolled. BTS-Net achieved mean Dice scores of 0.78, 0.74 and 0.80, mean IoUs of 0.67, 0.62 and 0.68, and mean Hausdorff distances of 15.83, 16.01 and 15.04 in the internal test set and two external test sets, respectively. The mean intra-class correlation and Pearson correlation co-efficients of TIC were 0.89, 0.92 and 0.98, and 0.91, 0.93 and 0.99, respectively. BTS-Net demonstrated a significantly higher mean Dice score and IoU in large (0.82, 0.72), homogeneous positive enhanced (0.81, 0.70) or stable (0.81, 0.70) lesions in pooled test sets.

CONCLUSION

Our study proposed BTS-Net for automated FLL segmentation of dynamic CEUS video, achieving favorable performance in the test sets. Downstream TIC generation based on BTS-Net performed well, demonstrating its potential as an effective segmentation tool in clinical practice.

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review for clinicians

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive liver malignancy that arises from second-order biliary epithelial cells. Its incidence is gradually increasing worldwide. Well-known risk factors have been described, although in many cases, they are not identifiable. Treatment options are continuously expanding, but the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. R0 liver resection remains the only curative treatment, but only a limited number of patients can benefit from it. Frequently, major hepatectomies are needed to completely remove the tumour. This could contraindicate surgery or increase postoperative morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. In cases of anticipated inadequate future liver remnant, regenerative techniques may be used to expand resectability. The role and extent of lymphadenectomy in iCCA are still matters of debate. Improvements in iCCA diagnosis and better understanding of genetic profiles might lead to optimized surgical approaches and drug therapies. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies is broadening, gaining more and more acceptance in clinical practice. Combining surgery with locoregional therapies and novel drugs, such as checkpoint-inhibitors and molecular-targeted molecules, might improve treatment options and survival rates. Liver transplantation, after very poor initial results, is now receiving attention for the treatment of patients with unresectable very early iCCA (i.e. <2 cm) in cirrhotic livers, showing survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ongoing prospective protocols are testing the efficacy of liver transplantation for patients with unresectable, advanced tumours confined to the liver, with sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment. In such a continuously changing landscape, the aim of our work is to review the state-of-the-art in the surgical and medical treatment of iCCA.

Rare infiltrative primary hepatic angiosarcoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The most primary sites of angiosarcoma are the skin, breast gland, and soft tissues. Primary hepatic angiosarcoma (PHA) is a rare malignant tumor of mesothelial tissue originating from the liver. PHA often presents with multiple intrahepatic foci or metastasis at the time of presentation due to its nonspecific clinical presentation and highly aggressive nature. There are no established or effective treatment guidelines for PHA, so early detection and early treatment are of great value for patient survival. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of literature on the imaging features of PHA, making the diagnosis and treatment of this disease a considerable challenge.

CASE SUMMARY

In this case report, we present a 59-year-old man who initially presented with abdominal pain and radiating pain in the right shoulder. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed multiple intrahepatic nodules that needed to be differentiated from tumors of vascular epithelial origin and tumors with progressive enhancement features, and signs of tumor metastasis were assessed. The patient was then subjected to contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) to further clarify the extent of tumor infiltration and the state of microcirculatory perfusion. The manifestations observed on CEUS were similar to the classical characteristic presentation of hepatocellular carcinoma, called "quick wash-in and quick wash-out". In addition, CEUS showed that the lesion exhibited gradual infiltration and growth along the liver pedicle structures with no invading blood vessels. Finally, based on pathological and immunohistochemical tests and the above imaging manifestations, it was confirmed that the patient had infiltrating PHA, which is a rare pathological type of PHA. The patient underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and chemotherapy. Four months after the onset of symptoms, the follow-up radiological examination revealed poor treatment efficacy and rapid deterioration.

CONCLUSION

This case report complements the imaging modalities of a rare infiltrative PHA, in which CEUS and quantitative analysis are found to offer substantial advantages in characterizing the microcirculatory perfusion of the lesion, providing clinicians with diagnostic information at the earliest opportunity to make a diagnosis and develop a treatment strategy to prolong the patient survival.

Subtype prediction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate the predictive value of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in differentiating small-duct (SD) and large-duct (LD) types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 110 patients with pathologically confirmed ICC lesions who were subject to preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations between January 2022 and February 2023. Patients were further classified according to the subtype: SD-type and LD-type, and an optimal predictive model was established and validated using the above pilot cohort. The test cohort, consisting of 48 patients prospectively enrolled from March 2023 to September 2023, was evaluated.

RESULTS

In the pilot cohort, compared with SD-type ICCs, more LD-type ICCs showed elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (p < 0.001), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p = 0.004), ill-defined margin (p = 0.018), intrahepatic bile duct dilation (p < 0.001). Among DCE-US quantitative parameters, the wash-out area under the curve (WoAUC), wash-in and wash-out area under the curve (WiWoAUC), and fall time (FT) at the margin of lesions were higher in the SD-type group (all p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the mean transit time (mTT) and wash-out rate (WoR) at the margin of the lesion were higher in the LD-type group (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that intrahepatic bile duct dilation, mTT, and WoR were significant predictive factors for predicting ICC subtypes, and the AUC of the predictive model achieved 0.833 in the test cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DCE-US has the potential to become a novel complementary method for predicting the pathological subtype of ICC.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

DCE-US has the potential to assess the subtypes of ICC lesions quantitatively and preoperatively, which allows for more accurate and objective differential diagnoses, and more appropriate treatments and follow-up or additional examination strategies for the two subtypes.

KEY POINTS

Preoperative determination of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) subtype aids in surgical decision-making. Quantitative parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced US (DCE-US) allow for the prediction of the ICC subtype. DCE-US-based imaging has the potential to become a novel complementary method for predicting ICC subtypes.

The value of combined ultrasound contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography for detecting and differentiating the rotator cuff tear subtypes in patients with the uncertain rotator cuff tear

OBJECTIVES

In this study, ultrasound (US) contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography with the contrast agent of SonoVue were performed to evaluate their value for detecting and differentiating the rotator cuff tear (RCT) subtypes in patients with the uncertain RCT.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with the clinically suspected RCTs in the orthopedic clinic were prospectively recruited and underwent conventional high-frequency US for the category of undoubted full-thickness RCT, uncertain RCT, and intact rotator cuff. Among these patients, the patients with uncertain RCT underwent the subsequent US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography. The arthroscopic findings were used as the gold standard in this study.

RESULTS

After the conventional US screening, 62 patients with uncertain RCT underwent the subsequent US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography. All the US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography were successfully performed and no severe side effects were observed in all the patients. For full-thickness tears, the sensitivity and specificity of the combined US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography were 94.7% (CI: 0.72-1.0) and 81.4% (CI: 0.66-0.91), respectively, and for articular-side tears 100% (CI: 0.51-1) and 100% (CI: 0.92-1), respectively, and for the bursal-side tears 84.6% (CI: 0.54-0.97) and 97.9% (CI: 0.88-1.0), respectively. The main inconsistency between the contrast-enhanced US and arthroscopy was that 7 patients with arthroscopic proved concurrent articular- and bursal-side tears were indicated as full-thickness RCTs on contrast-enhanced US.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography are useful for detecting the RCT subtypes in patients with the uncertain RCTs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

When conventional high-frequency US has some difficulty in differentiating the full-thickness from partial-thickness RCTs, combined US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography could be used to improve the detection accuracy of RCT subtypes.

KEY POINTS

• This is the first study by injection of the US contrast agent SonoVue into the shoulder joint cavity and subacromial-subdeltoid bursa for the detection and differentiation of the RCT subtypes among the people with the uncertain RCT by conventional US screening. • The SonoVue was injected into the glenohumeral joint cavity under US guidance to differentiate the full-thickness RCTs from partial-thickness RCTs. • Combined US contrast arthrography and subacromial-subdeltoid bursography are useful for detecting the RCT subtypes in patients with the uncertain RCTs.

Comparison contrast-enhanced CT with contrast-enhanced US in diagnosing combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVES

To develop and compare noninvasive models for differentiating between combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and HCC based on serum tumor markers, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and computed tomography (CECT).

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2021, patients with pathologically confirmed cHCC-CCA or HCC who underwent both preoperative CEUS and CECT were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity scores were calculated to match cHCC-CCA and HCC patients with a near-neighbor ratio of 1:2. Two predicted models, a CEUS-predominant (CEUS features plus tumor markers) and a CECT-predominant model (CECT features plus tumor markers), were constructed using logistic regression analyses. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients (mean age, 51.3 years ± 10.9; 122 men) with 135 tumors (45 cHCC-CCA and 90 HCC) were included. By logistic regression analysis, unclear boundary in the intratumoral nonenhanced area, partial washout on CEUS, CA 19-9 > 100 U/mL, lack of cirrhosis, incomplete tumor capsule, and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) volume < 50% on CECT were independent factors for a diagnosis of cHCC-CCA. The CECT-predominant model showed almost perfect sensitivity for cHCC-CCA, unlike the CEUS-predominant model (93.3% vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001). The CEUS-predominant model showed higher diagnostic specificity than the CECT-predominant model (80.0% vs. 63.3%; p = 0.020), especially in the ≤ 5 cm subgroup (92.0% vs. 70.0%; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The CECT-predominant model provides higher diagnostic sensitivity than the CEUS-predominant model for CHCC-CCA. Combining CECT features with serum CA 19-9 > 100 U/mL shows excellent sensitivity.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Combining lack of cirrhosis, incomplete tumor capsule, and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) volume < 50% on CECT with serum CA 19-9 > 100 U/mL shows excellent sensitivity in differentiating cHCC-CCA from HCC.

KEY POINTS

1. Accurate differentiation between cHCC-CCA and HCC is essential for treatment decisions. 2. The CECT-predominant model provides higher accuracy than the CEUS-predominant model for CHCC-CCA. 3. Combining CECT features and CA 19-9 levels shows a sensitivity of 93.3% in diagnosing cHCC-CCA.

A multi-parameter intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma scoring system based on modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS M criteria for differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop a multi-parameter intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) scoring system and compare its diagnostic performance with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system M (LR-M) criteria for differentiating ICC from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 62 high-risk patients with ICCs and 62 high-risk patients with matched HCCs between January 2022 and December 2022 from two institutions. The CEUS LR-M criteria was modified by adjusting the early wash-out onset (within 45 s) and the marked wash-out (within 3 min). Then, a multi-parameter ICC scoring system was established based on clinical features, B-mode ultrasound features, and modified LR-M criteria.

RESULT

We found that elevated CA 19-9 (OR=12.647), lesion boundary (OR=11.601), peripheral rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement (OR=23.654), early wash-out onset (OR=7.211), and marked wash-out (OR=19.605) were positive predictors of ICC, whereas elevated alpha-fetoprotein (OR=0.078) was a negative predictor. Based on these findings, an ICC scoring system was established. Compared with the modified LR-M and LR-M criteria, the ICC scoring system showed the highest area under the curve (0.911 vs. 0.831 and 0.750, both p<0.05) and specificity (0.935 vs. 0.774 and 0.565, both p<0.05). Moreover, the numbers of HCCs categorized as LR-M decreased from 27 (43.5%) to 14 (22.6%) and 4 (6.5%) using the modified LR-M criteria and ICC scoring system, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The modified LR-M criteria-based multi-parameter ICC scoring system had the highest specificity for diagnosing ICC and reduced the number of HCC cases diagnosed as LR-M category.

A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators to differentiate mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) from hepatic metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

A total of 343 patients with pathologically confirmed MF-ICC or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled between October 2018 and July 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. Preoperative ultrasound features and clinical indicators were retrieved. Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to select relevant features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model, which was presented as a nomogram in training sets. The model's performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

Results

The study included 169 patients with MF-ICC and 174 with liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, assigned to training (n=238) and validation (n=105) cohorts. The nomogram incorporated ultrasound features (tumor size, lesion number, echogenicity, tumor necrosis, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement) and clinical information (serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125). The nomogram demonstrated promising performance in differentiating these two entities in both training and validation sets, with an AUC value of 0.937 (95%CI: 0.907,0.969) and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.863,0.968), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves confirmed good consistency between predictions and observations. Additionally, decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram's high clinical practicability.

Conclusion

The nomogram based on ultrasound features and clinical indicators demonstrated good discrimination performance in differentiating MF-ICC from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, which may enhance clinical decision-making process in managing these challenging diagnostic scenarios.

Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: 2023 Guidelines From the Korean Society of Radiology and the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Sonazoid, a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent, was introduced for the diagnosis of hepatic nodules. To clarify the issues with Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the Korean Society of Radiology and Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology collaborated on the guidelines. The guidelines are de novo, evidence-based, and selected using an electronic voting system for consensus. These include imaging protocols, diagnostic criteria for HCC, diagnostic value for lesions that are inconclusive on other imaging results, differentiation from non-HCC malignancies, surveillance of HCC, and treatment response after locoregional and systemic treatment for HCC.

Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer. It is a complex "biphenotypic" tumor type consisting of bipotential hepatic progenitor cells that can differentiate into cholangiocytes subtype and hepatocytes subtype. The prognosis of patients with cHCC-CC is quite poor with its specific and more aggressive nature. Furthermore, there are no definite demographic or clinical features of cHCC-CC, thus a clear preoperative identification and accurate non-invasive imaging diagnostic analysis of cHCC-CC are of great value. In this review, we first summarized the epidemiological features, pathological findings, molecular biological information and serological indicators of cHCC-CC disease. Then we reviewed the important applications of non-invasive imaging modalities-particularly ultrasound (US)-in cHCC-CC, covering both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with cHCC-CC. Finally, we presented the shortcomings and potential outlooks for imaging studies in cHCC-CC.

Sonazoid™ versus SonoVue® for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in At-Risk Individuals: A Prospective, Single-Center, Intraindividual, Noninferiority Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) was noninferior to SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the same diagnostic criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, noninferiority study (NCT04847726) enrolled 105 at-risk participants (71 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 11 years; range, 26-86 years) with treatment-naïve solid hepatic nodules (≥ 1 cm). All participants underwent same-day SZUS (experimental method) and SVUS (control method) for one representative nodule per participant. Images were interpreted by three readers (the operator and two independent readers). All malignancies were diagnosed histopathologically, while the benignity of other lesions was confirmed by follow-up stability or pathology. The primary endpoint was per-lesion diagnostic accuracy for HCC pooled across three readers using the conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic criteria, including arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by mild (assessed within 2 minutes after contrast injection) and late (≥ 60 seconds with a delay of 5 minutes) washout. The noninferiority delta was -10%p. Furthermore, different time delays were compared as washout criteria in SZUS, including delays of 2, 5, and > 10 minutes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 lesions (HCCs [n = 61], non-HCC malignancies [n = 19], and benign [n = 25]) were evaluated. Using the 5-minutes washout criterion, per-lesion accuracy of SZUS pooled across the three readers (72.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.1%-79.3%) was noninferior to that of SVUS (71.4%; 95% CI, 63.1%-78.6%), meeting the statistical criterion for non-inferiority (difference of 0.95%p; 95% CI, -3.8%p-5.7%p). The arterial phase hyperenhancement combined with the 5-minutes washout criterion showed the same sensitivity as that of the > 10-minutes criterion (59.0% vs. 59.0%, p = 0.989), and the specificities were not significantly different (90.9% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

SZUS was noninferior to SVUS for diagnosing HCC in at-risk patients using the same diagnostic criteria. No significant improvement in HCC diagnosis was observed by extending the washout time delay from 5 to 10 minutes.

Comparison of current guidelines and consensus on the management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma: 2022 update

As a consequence of breakthroughs in the area of guidelines research, the therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has significantly improved the efficacy rate of diagnosis and survival outcomes. We compared the most recently updated clinical practice guidelines and consensus to provide recommendations based on the diagnostic and therapeutic equipment available in various countries. Following a systematic review, we discovered that these guidelines and consensus had both similarities and differences in terms of what organizations or groups drafted the guidelines and the approach, applicability, content and recent updates of the guidelines as well as in terms of diagnostic and treatment algorithms. The disparities could be attributable to a variety of etiological factors, high risk patients, health resources, medical technology, treatment options, and income levels. Additionally, while complete adoption of guidelines may benefit physicians, patients, and authorities, there remains a disconnect between expected goals and implementation.

Distinctive Metabolism-Associated Gene Clusters That Are Also Prognostic in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective

To offer new prognostic evaluations by exploring potentially distinctive genetic features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

There were 12 samples for gene expression profiling processes in this study. These included three HCC lesion samples and their matched adjacent nontumor liver tissues obtained from patients with HCC, as well as three ICC samples and their controls collected similarly. In addition to the expression matrix generated on our own, profiles of other cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were also employed in later bioinformatical analyses. Differential analyses, functional analyses, protein interaction network analyses, and gene set variation analyses were used to identify key genes. To establish the prognostic models, univariate/multivariate Cox analyses and subsequent stepwise regression were applied, with the Akaike information criterion evaluating the goodness of fitness.

Results

The top three pathways enriched in HCC were all metabolism-related; they were fatty acid degradation, retinol metabolism, and arachidonic acid metabolism. In ICC, on the other hand, additional pathways related to fat digestion and absorption and cholesterol metabolism were identified. Consistent characteristics of such a metabolic landscape were observed across different cohorts. A prognostic risk score model for calculating HCC risk was constructed, consisting of ADH4, ADH6, CYP2C9, CYP4F2, and RDH16. This signature predicts the 3-year survival with an AUC area of 0.708 (95%CI = 0.644 to 0.772). For calculating the risk of ICC, a prognostic risk score model was built upon the expression levels of CYP26A1, NAT2, and UGT2B10. This signature predicts the 3-year survival with an AUC area of 0.806 (95% CI = 0.664 to 0.947).

Conclusion

HCC and ICC share commonly abrupted pathways associated with the metabolism of fatty acids, retinol, arachidonic acids, and drugs, indicating similarities in their pathogenesis as primary liver cancers. On the flip side, these two types of cancer possess distinctive promising biomarkers for predicting overall survival or potential targeted therapies.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease. Worldwide, it ranks sixth in terms of incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer-related deaths. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is used as an add-on test to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma after prior diagnostic tests such as abdominal ultrasound or measurement of alpha-foetoprotein, or both. According to guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging investigation, with either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may show the typical hepatocellular carcinoma hallmarks in people with cirrhosis, which will be sufficient to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas show atypical imaging features, and therefore, are missed at imaging. Dynamic CEUS images are obtained similarly to CT and MRI images. CEUS differentiates between arterial and portal venous phases, in which sonographic hepatocellular carcinoma hallmarks, such as arterial hyperenhancement and subsequent washout appearance, are investigated. The advantages of CEUS over CT and MRI include real-time imaging, use of contrast agents that do not contain iodine and are not nephrotoxic, and quick image acquisition. Despite the advantages, the use of CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC remains controversial, with disagreement on relevant guidelines. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival as the conflicting results can be a consequence of an inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Therefore, assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is needed for either diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma or ruling it out in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. 2. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in people with chronic liver disease and identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The last date of search was 5 November 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver, and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods to screen studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We used the bivariate model and provided estimates of summary sensitivity and specificity. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We presented uncertainty-of-the-accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 studies with 6546 participants. Studies were published between 2001 and 2021. We judged all 23 studies at high-risk of bias in at least one domain, and 13/23 studies at high concern for applicability. Most studies used different reference standards to exclude the presence of the target condition. The time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. We also had major concerns on their applicability due to the characteristics of the participants. - CEUS for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.8% (95% CI 69.4% to 84.4%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 89.1% to 96.6%) (23 studies, 6546 participants; very low-certainty evidence). - CEUS for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 62.9% to 87.6%) and specificity 92.7% (95% CI 86.8% to 96.1%) (13 studies, 1257 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, including only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted with no knowledge of the results about the index test, showed no differences in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that by using CEUS, as an add-on test following abdominal ultrasound, to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would unnecessarily undergo further testing or inappropriate treatment. As to resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 23% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would incorrectly be unresected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo further inappropriate testing or treatment. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias of the included studies, heterogeneity, and imprecision of the results and concerns on their applicability limit our ability to draw confident conclusions.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Based Nomogram: A Potential Predictor of Individually Postoperative Early Recurrence for Patients With Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSES

To evaluate the postsurgical prognostic implication of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC). To build a CEUS-based early recurrence prediction classifier for CHC, in comparison with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging.

METHODS

The CEUS features and clinicopathological findings of each case were analyzed, and the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categories were assigned. The recurrence-free survival associated factors were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. Incorporating the independent factors, nomograms were built to estimate the possibilities of 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year recurrence and whose prognostic value was determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics, calibration curves, and hazard layering efficiency validation, comparing with TNM staging system.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, the levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9, prothrombin time and total bilirubin, and tumor shape, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category were independent factors for recurrence-free survival. The LR-M category showed longer recurrence-free survival than did the LR-4/5 category. The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year area under the curves of the CEUS-clinical nomogram, clinical nomogram, and TNM staging system were 0.518, 0.552, and 0.843 versus 0.354, 0.240, and 0.624 (P = .048, .049, and .471) vs. 0.562, 0.545, and 0.843 (P = .630, .564, and .007), respectively. The calibration curves of the CEUS-clinical model at different prediction time pionts were all close to the ideal line. The CEUS-clinical model effectively stratified patients into groups of high and low risk of recurrence in both training and validation set, while the TNM staging system only works on the training set.

CONCLUSIONS

Our CEUS-clinical nomogram is a reliable early recurrence prediction tool for hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and helps postoperative risk stratification.

Preoperative Survival Prediction in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Using an Ultrasound-Based Radiographic-Radiomics Signature

OBJECTIVES

To construct a preoperative model for survival prediction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients using ultrasound (US) based radiographic-radiomics signatures.

METHODS

Between April 2010 and September 2015, 170 patients with ICC who underwent curative resection were retrospectively recruited. Overall survival (OS)-related radiographic signatures and radiomics signatures based on preoperative US were built and assessed through a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A nomogram was developed based on the selected predictors from the radiographic-radiomics signatures and clinical and laboratory results of the training cohort (n = 127), validated in an independent testing cohort (n = 43) by the concordance index (C-index), and compared with the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) cancer staging system as well as the radiographic and radiomics nomograms.

RESULTS

The median areas under the curve of the radiomics signature and radiographic signature were higher than that of the TNM staging system in the testing cohort, although the values were not significantly different (0.76-0.82 versus 0.62, P = .485 and .264). The preoperative nomogram with CA 19-9, sex, ascites, radiomics signature, and radiographic signature had C-indexes of 0.72 and 0.75 in the training and testing cohorts, respectively, and it had significantly higher predictive performance than the 8th TNM staging system in the testing cohort (C-index: 0.75 versus 0.67, P = .004) and a higher C-index than the radiomics nomograms (0.75 versus 0.68, P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative nomogram integrated with the radiographic-radiomics signature demonstrated good predictive performance for OS in ICC and was superior to the 8th TNM staging system.

Diagnostic criteria of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk individuals: how is late washout determined?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal washout criteria of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasonography (PFB-US) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk individuals.

METHODS

Participants at risk of HCC with treatment-naïve solid hepatic observations (≥1 cm) who underwent PFB-US from March 2019 to September 2020 were prospectively recruited. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout time, and washout degree were evaluated. The diagnosis of HCC was made by non-rim APHE with late and mild washout. The per-lesion diagnostic performance for diagnosing HCC using different cutoffs for late washout (50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 seconds postcontrast) and the different time windows for determining washout (until 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 minutes postcontrast) were compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

In total, 101 participants with 113 observations (mean size, 33.5±2.8 mm; HCCs [n=82], non-HCC malignancies [n=16], benign [n=15]) were evaluated. Non-rim APHE was observed in 86.6% (71/82) of HCCs. As the cutoff time for late washout increased, the specificity increased to 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.8% to 100%) at the 60-second cutoff with 62.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 50.8% to 72.7%). When the time window for determining washout became wider, the sensitivity and accuracy increased until 6 minutes, with 100% specificity at all times.

CONCLUSION

Determining washout within 6 minutes after contrast injection with a 60-second cutoff for late washout showed the highest sensitivity without losing specificity for diagnosing HCC using PFB-US in individuals at high risk.

LR-M Observations on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Additional Features in Comparison with Current LI-RADS Criteria

Background: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS assigns category LR-M for observations that are definitely or probably malignant but that are not specific on imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A high percentage of LR-M observations represent HCC. Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the utility of additional features, beyond conventional LI-RADS major features, for detecting HCC among LR-M observations on CEUS. Methods: This retrospective study included 174 patients (145 men, 29 women; mean age, 53 years) at high-risk for HCC who underwent CEUS from August 2014 to June 2016, demonstrating an LR-M observation using CEUS LI-RADS version 2017. Two radiologists independently assessed CEUS images for major features and four additional features (chaotic vessels, peripheral circular artery, clear boundary of the tumor enhancement, clear boundary of the intratumoral nonenhanced area). Diagnostic performance was assessed of four proposed criteria for the detection of HCC among LR-M observations. The impact on HCC detection of criteria based on the additional findings was further explored. Histology or composite imaging and clinical follow-up served as reference standard. Results: The 174 LR-M observations included 142 HCCs and 32 non-HCCs (20 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 5 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, 7 benign lesions). Interreader agreement of the additional features, expressed as kappa, ranged from 0.65 to 0.88. Two of the additional features exhibited PPV ≥95.0% for HCC: chaotic vessels (95.0%) and peripheral circular arteries (98.1%). The presence of either of these two additional features achieved sensitivity of 50.7%, specificity of 90.6%, PPV of 96.0%, and NPV of 29.3% for HCC. Three other explored criteria incorporating variations of major LI-RADS features, but not the additional features, had sensitivities of 55.6%-96.5%, specificities of 49.6%-68.8%, PPVs of 87.8%-90.6%, and NPVs of 25.0%-75.0%. Criteria using additional features recategorized 75 of 174 LR-M observations as LR-5, of which 72 were HCC. Conclusion: The presence of chaotic vessels and/or peripheral circular artery had high specificity and PPV for HCC among LR-M observations. Other explored criteria based on major features did not achieve higher specificity or PPV. Clinical Impact: Clinical adoption of the additional CEUS features could help establish the diagnosis of HCC noninvasively and avoid the need for biopsy of LR-M observations.

CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 vs. CEUS LI-RADS v2017-Can Things Be Put Together?

Simple Summary

The LI-RADS system is nowadays the mainstream system used in classifying liver nodules in cirrhotic liver according to their risk of malignancy. Two main LI-RADS documents have been released—the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 document, and the CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 document. In some circumstances, a nodule can be differently classified when using CEUS versus when using CT or MRI. In this paper, we also focus on the existing similitudes between the two documents but, essentially, on the differences between the two main documents and the complementarities between imaging techniques in characterizing liver nodules in cirrhotic livers. Awareness of the complementarity of imaging techniques may lead to an improvement in the characterization and classification of liver nodules and will reduce the number of liver biopsies. This paper proposes practical solutions in order to better classify and manage observations or nodules detected in cirrhotic livers.

Abstract

Different LI-RADS core documents were released for CEUS and for CT/MRI. Both documents rely on major and ancillary diagnostic criteria. The present paper offers an exhaustive comparison of the two documents focusing on the similarities, but especially on the differences, complementarity, and added value of imaging techniques in classifying liver nodules in cirrhotic livers. The major diagnostic criteria are defined, and the sensitivity and specificity of each major diagnostic criteria are presented according to the literature. The existing differences between techniques in assessing the major diagnostic features can be then exploited in order to ensure a better classification and a better clinical management of liver nodules in cirrhotic livers. Ancillary features depend on the imaging technique used, and their presence can upgrade or downgrade the LI-RADS score of an observation, but only as far as LI-RADS 4. MRI is the imaging technique that provides the greatest number of ancillary features, whereas CEUS has fewer ancillary features than other imaging techniques. In the final part of the manuscript, some recommendations are made by the authors in order to guidephysicians as to when adding another imaging technique can be helpful in managing liver nodules in cirrhotic livers.

Liver Imaging and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018 and Other Imaging Features in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Chinese Adults with vs. without Chronic Hepatitis B Viral Infection

PURPOSE

To describe liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 and other MRI imaging features in intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in Chinese adults with vs. without chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 89 patients with pathologically proven iCCA after multiphase imaging performed between 2004 and 2017 at a tertiary medical center in southern China. Based on whether patients had chronic HBV, iCCA was divided into two subgroups: HBV-positive (n = 50 patients, including 9 with cirrhosis) vs. HBV-negative (n = 39 patients, including 14 with hepatolithiasis and 25 with no identifiable risk factor for iCCA; none had cirrhosis). Two independent abdominal radiologists in consensus reviewed the largest mass in each patient to assign LI-RADS v2018 features; they also scored each observation's shape and location. Imaging features were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Most iCCAs in HBV-positive (88% (44/50)) and HBV-negative (97% (38/39)) patients had at least one LR-M feature. Compared to iCCAs in HBV-negative patients, iCCAs in HBV-positive patients were more likely to have at least one major feature of HCC (46% (23/50) vs. 8% (3/39), P < 0.001) and more likely to be smooth (42% (21/50) vs. 10% (4/39), P = 0.001). Six of 50 (12%) iCCAs in HBV-positive patients and 1/39 (3%) iCCAs in HBV-negative patients had at least one major feature of HCC without any LR-M feature.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective single-center study in Chinese adults, iCCAs in HBV-positive patients were more likely to resemble HCCs than iCCAs in HBV-negative patients.

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound as a Second-Line Diagnostic Modality in Noninvasive Diagnostic Algorithms for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and its role as a second-line imaging modality after gadoxetate-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among at risk observations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled participants at risk of HCC with treatment-naïve solid hepatic observations (≥ 1 cm) of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LR)-3/4/5/M during surveillance and performed Gd-EOB-MRI. A total of one hundred and three participants with 103 hepatic observations (mean size, 28.2 ± 24.5 mm; HCCs [n = 79], non-HCC malignancies [n = 15], benign [n = 9]; diagnosed by pathology [n = 57], or noninvasive method [n = 46]) were included in this study. The participants underwent CEUS with sulfur hexafluoride. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout on Gd-EOB-MRI and CEUS were evaluated. The distinctive washout in CEUS was defined as mild washout 60 seconds after contrast injection. The diagnostic ability of Gd-EOB-MRI and of CEUS as a second-line modality for HCC were determined according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) guidelines. The diagnostic abilities of both imaging modalities were compared using the McNemar's test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of CEUS (60.8%) was lower than that of Gd-EOB-MRI (72.2%, p = 0.06 by EASL; 86.1%, p < 0.01 by KLCA-NCC); however, the specificity was 100%. By performing CEUS on the inconclusive observations in Gd-EOB-MRI, HCCs without APHE (n = 10) or washout (n = 12) on Gd-EOB-MRI further presented APHE (80.0%, 8/10) or distinctive washout (66.7%, 8/12) on CEUS, and more HCCs were diagnosed than with Gd-EOB-MRI alone (sensitivity: 72.2% vs. 83.5% by EASL, p < 0.01; 86.1% vs. 91.1% by KCLA-NCC, p = 0.04). There were no false-positive cases for HCC on CEUS.

CONCLUSION

The addition of CEUS to Gd-EOB-MRI as a second-line diagnostic modality increases the frequency of HCC diagnosis without changing the specificities.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pathogenesis, current staging, and radiological findings

To this date, it is a major oncological challenge to optimally diagnose, stage, and manage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Imaging can not only diagnose and stage ICC, but it can also guide management. Hence, imaging is indispensable in the management of ICC. In this article, we review the pathology, epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, staging, pathology, radiology, and treatment of ICC.

Role of imaging in management of hepatocellular carcinoma: surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment response

Imaging plays a notable role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment response assessment. Whereas HCC surveillance among at-risk patients, including those with cirrhosis, has traditionally been ultrasound-based, there are increasing data showing that this strategy is operator-dependent and has insufficient sensitivity when used alone. Several novel blood-based and imaging modalities are currently being evaluated to increase sensitivity for early HCC detection. Multi-phase computed tomography (CT) or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be performed in patients with positive surveillance tests to confirm a diagnosis of HCC and perform cancer staging, as needed. HCC is a unique cancer in that most cases can be diagnosed radiographically without histological confirmation when demonstrating characteristic features such as arterial phase hyperenhancement and delayed phase washout. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System offers a standardized nomenclature for reporting CT or MRI liver findings among at-risk patients. Finally, cross-sectional imaging plays a critical role for assessing response to any HCC therapy as well as monitoring for HCC recurrence in those who achieve complete response.

Differential diagnosis between hepatic alveolar echinococcosis and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Misclassifications of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE) as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) may lead to inappropriate treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the differential diagnosis with conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

Sixty HAE lesions with 60 propensity score-matched ICC lesions were retrospectively collected. The 120 lesions were randomly divided into a training set (n = 80) and a testing set (n = 40). In the training set, the most useful independent conventional ultrasound and CEUS features was selected for differentiating between HAE and ICC. Then, a simplified US scoring system for diagnosing HAE was constructed based on selected features with weighted coefficients. The constructed US score for HAE was validated in both the training set and the testing set, and diagnostic performance was evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with ICC lesions, HAE lesions were mostly located in the right lobe and had mixed echogenicity, a pseudocystic appearance and foci calcifications on conventional ultrasound. On CEUS, HAE lesions showed more regular rim-like enhancement than ICC lesions and had late washout with a long enhancement duration. The simplified US score consisted of echogenicity, pseudocystic/calcification, bile duct dilatation, enhancement pattern, enhancement duration, and marked washout. In the testing set, the sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR- and the area under the ROC curve for the score to differentiate HAE from ICC were 80.0, 81.3%, 4.27, 0.25 and 0.905, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The US score based on typical features from both conventional ultrasound and CEUS could accurately differentiate HAE from ICC.

Can contrast enhanced ultrasound differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) differ in treatment and prognosis, warranting an effective differential diagnosis between them. The LR-M category in the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) was set up for lesions that are malignant but not specific to HCC. However, a substantial number of HCC cases in this category elevated the diagnostic challenge.

AIM

To investigate the possibility and efficacy of differentiating ICC from HCC classified in the LR-M category according to the CEUS LI-RADS.

METHODS

Patients with complete CEUS records together with pathologically confirmed ICC and LR-M HCC (HCC classified in the CEUS LI-RADS LR-M category) between January 2015 and October 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Each ICC was assigned a category as per the CEUS LI-RADS. The enhancement pattern, washout timing, and washout degree between the ICC and LR-M HCC were compared using the χ² test. Logistic regression analysis was used for prediction of ICC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to investigate the possibility of LR-M criteria and serum tumor markers in differentiating ICC from LR-M HCC.

RESULTS

A total of 228 nodules (99 ICCs and 129 LR-M HCCs) in 228 patients were included. The mean sizes of ICC and LR-M HCC were 6.3 ± 2.8 cm and 5.5 ± 3.5 cm, respectively (P = 0.03). Peripheral rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was detected in 50.5% (50/99) of ICCs vs 16.3% (21/129) of LR-M HCCs (P < 0.001). Early washout was found in 93.4% (93/99) of ICCs vs 96.1% (124/129) of LR-M HCCs (P > 0.05). Marked washout was observed in 23.2% (23/99) of ICCs and 7.8% (10/129) of LR-M HCCs (P = 0.002), while this feature did not show up alone either in ICC or LR-M HCC. Homogeneous hyperenhancement was detected in 15.2% (15/99) of ICCs and 37.2% (48/129) of LR-M HCCs (P < 0.001). The logistic regression showed that rim APHE, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) had significant correlations with ICC (r = 1.251, 3.074, and -2.767, respectively; P < 0.01). Rim APHE presented the best enhancement pattern for diagnosing ICC, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.70, sensitivity of 70.4%, and specificity of 68.8%. When rim hyperenhancement was coupled with elevated CA 19-9 and normal AFP, the AUC and sensitivity improved to 0.82 and 100%, respectively, with specificity decreasing to 63.9%.

CONCLUSION

Rim APHE is a key predictor for differentiating ICC from LR-M HCC. Rim APHE plus elevated CA 19-9 and normal AFP is a strong predictor of ICC rather than LR-M HCC. Early washout and marked washout have limited value for the differentiation between the two entities.

Emerging Role of Hepatobiliary Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Emphasis on Recent Updates in Major Guidelines

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be noninvasively diagnosed on the basis of its characteristic imaging findings of arterial phase enhancement and portal/delayed “washout” on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cirrhotic patients. However, different specific diagnostic criteria have been proposed by several countries and major academic societies. In 2018, major guideline updates were proposed by the Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) of Korea. In addition to dynamic CT and MRI using extracellular contrast media, these new guidelines now include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using hepatobiliary contrast media as the first-line diagnostic test, while the KLCA-NCC and EASL guidelines also include contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the second-line diagnostic test. Therefore, hepatobiliary MR contrast media and CEUS will be increasingly used for the noninvasive diagnosis and staging of HCC. In this review, we discuss the emerging role of hepatobiliary phase MRI and CEUS for the diagnosis of HCC and also review the changes in the HCC diagnostic criteria in major guidelines, including the KLCA-NCC practice guidelines version 2018. In addition, we aimed to pay particular attention to some remaining issues in the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC.

Characterization of Indeterminate Liver Lesions on CT and MRI With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: What Is the Evidence?

OBJECTIVE. CT or MRI is most commonly used for characterizing focal hepatic lesions. However, findings on CT and MRI are occasionally indeterminate. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), with its unique characteristics as a purely intravascular contrast agent and real-time evaluation of enhancement, is a useful next step. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for performing CEUS in the assessment of indeterminate hepatic lesions seen on CT and MRI. CONCLUSION. CEUS is a useful problem-solving tool in the evaluation of liver lesions that are indeterminate on CT and MRI. Uses include detection of arterial phase hyperenhancement; differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; determination of benign versus malignant tumor thrombus, benign versus neoplastic cystic hepatic lesions, and hepatocellular adenoma versus focal nodular hyperplasia; and monitoring for recurrence in postablative therapies. CEUS can help establish a confident diagnosis and determine the need for further invasive diagnosis or treatment.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Features of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A New Perspective

The objective of this study was to illustrate our specific findings for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In this study, 21 patients at our hospitals with pathologically proven ICC and CEUS data were retrospectively enrolled. General clinical data of the patients, and features of lesions on conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were recorded. Two experienced radiologists retrospectively reviewed all images by consensus. On gray-scale sonography, hypoechoic, isoechoic and hyperechoic lesions accounted for 85.7%, 9.5% and 4.8%, respectively, of all lesions. Hypovascular patterns were found for 95.2% of the lesions on color Doppler flow imaging. During the arterial phase of CEUS, heterogeneous hyperenhancement, homogeneous hyperenhancement, rim-like hyperenhancement, isoenhancement and hypoenhancement were observed for 61.9%, 19.0%, 9.5%, 4.8%, 4.8% of the lesions, respectively. During the portal venous and late phases, 85.7% and 95.2% of the lesions, respectively, exhibited hypoenhancement. In addition, 66.7% of the ICC lesions exhibited washed-out interiors but little decrease in enhancement at the periphery during the portal venous phase, resulting in the formation of a hyperenhanced peripheral rim. In conclusion, the rim sign in the portal venous phase of CEUS could help diagnose ICC. This trait could be related to the infiltrating growth pattern of ICC.

Evaluation of Contrast-enhanced US LI-RADS version 2017: Application on 2020 Liver Nodules in Patients with Hepatitis B Infection

Background Use of contrast material-enhanced (CE) US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017 has not been validated in large populations where hepatitis B virus (HBV) is endemic. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CE US LI-RADS version 2017 in a population with a high prevalence of HBV infection. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, liver nodules in patients with HBV who were evaluated from January 2004 to December 2016 were categorized as CE US LR-1 to LR-5 through LR-M. A subgroup of LR-M nodules was reclassified as LR-5, and additional analysis was performed. The reference standard consisted of histologic evaluation or composite imaging and clinical follow-up findings. Diagnostic performance was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value. Results A total of 2020 nodules in 1826 patients (median age, 54 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 1642 men) were included. Of the 1159 LR-5 lesions, 1141 were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); three, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas; six, other malignancies; six, atypical hyperplasia; and three, benign lesions. The PPV of LR-5 for HCC was 98% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98%, 99%). In LR-M nodules, 153 showed arterial phase hyperenhancement, early washout, and absence of punched-out appearance within 5 minutes, and 142 of 153 (93%; 95% CI: 89%, 97%) were HCC. If these nodules were reclassified as LR-5, LR-M specificity and PPV as a predictor of non-HCC malignancy increased from 88% (95% CI: 87%, 89%) and 36% (95% CI: 31%, 41%) to 96% (95% CI: 95%, 97%) and 58% (95% CI: 51%, 65%), respectively (P < .001). Despite reclassification, LR-5 specificity and PPV remained high (94% [95% CI: 92%, 96%] and 98% [95% CI: 97%, 99%], respectively). Conclusion The contrast-enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 category LR-5 is effectively predictive of the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma. In patients with hepatitis B virus infection, performance may be further improved by reclassification of category LR-M nodules with arterial phase hyperenhancement, early washout, and no punched-out appearance to LR-5. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sidhu in this issue.

Value of Perfusion Parameters for Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastasis With Hypervascularity and a Normal Hepatic Background on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion parameters in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and metastatic liver tumors (MLTs) with hypervascularity.

METHODS

Sixty-seven HCCs and 55 MLTs with arterial homogeneous/heterogeneous hyperenhancement on CEUS imaging and a normal liver background were included in this retrospective study. Six CEUS perfusion parameters were compared between HCCs and MLTs with different sizes and HCC differentiations: rise time (RT), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time, wash-out time (WT), maximum intensity (IMAX), and area under the curve (AUC). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was determined to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the parameters.

RESULTS

The RT, TTP, and WT were significant longer and the IMAX and AUC were significantly higher in HCCs than in MLTs. In distinguishing between HCCs and MLTs, the AUROC was highest for the WT (0.922; sensitivity, 85.1%; specificity, 89.6%); the AUC and IMAX had the second and third highest AUROCs (AUC: 0.855; sensitivity, 76.1%; specificity, 80.6%; IMAX: 0.827; sensitivity, 76.1%; specificity, 77.6%). The AUROC was lowest for the TTP and RT (TTP: 0.719; sensitivity, 70.1%; specificity, 61.2%; RT: 0.707; sensitivity, 67.2%; specificity, 65.7%). In HCCs, both the tumor size and degree of differentiation affected the IMAX, AUC, and WT. In MLTs, perfusion parameters were not influenced by the tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

In HCCs and MLTs with hypervascularity and a normal liver background on CEUS imaging, various CEUS perfusion parameters, including IMAX, AUC, WT, RT, and TTP, differed significantly between tumor types. The WT may be the most useful parameter for differentiating between these tumors.

State of the Art: LI-RADS for Contrast-enhanced US

Contrast material-enhanced (CE) US is a recognized imaging tool in the characterization of focal liver lesions and uses microbubble contrast agents to increase signal backscattering from the blood. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology and the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology strongly recommend the use of CE US in the characterization of hepatocellular nodules in individuals with liver cirrhosis. CE US was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for liver indications in adult and pediatric patients. CE US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria were recently proposed by the American College of Radiology and include eight distinct diagnostic categories: LR-1 (definitely benign), LR-2 (probably benign), LR-3 (intermediate malignancy probability), LR-4 (probably hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), LR-5 (definitely HCC), LR-NC (cannot be categorized due to image degradation), LR-TIV (tumor in vein), and LR-M (probably or definitely malignant but not HCC specific). CE US LI-RADS criteria can be used to produce a structured report for HCC diagnosis. However, the variability of US equipment in terms of sensitivity to microbubble signal, interreader variability, large number of HCC nodules classified as LR-3, and wide washout temporal range for LR-M observations are limitations.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features of Hepatic Reactive Lymphoid Hyperplasia: Correlation With Histopathologic Findings

OBJECTIVES

To find certain specifics of hepatic reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (HRLH) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging as diagnostic imaging clues by retrospectively analyzing its enhancement features.

METHODS

From June 2010 to June 2017, 18 histopathologically confirmed HRLH lesions in 18 patients were included in this retrospective study. The lesion's location, maximum diameter, shape, margin, echogenicity, and color flow signal on conventional ultrasound (US) imaging and enhancement pattern, presence of a feeding artery, and donutlike enhancement on CEUS imaging were observed and recorded. The lesion size on CEUS imaging at peak enhancement and that on conventional US imaging were compared and recorded.

RESULTS

All of the lesions showed homogeneous hypoechogenicity with a regular well-defined margin on conventional US imaging, with a mean diameter ± SD of 14.3 ± 4.6 mm (range, 8-24 mm). On CEUS imaging, all of the lesions showed "quick-wash-in and quick-wash-out," which showed complete homogeneous hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and wash-out in the second half of the arterial phase or first half of the portal phase. In 83.3% (15 of 18) of the lesions, the lesion size that was enhanced at peak was enlarged compared with the hypoechoic area on conventional US imaging, and transient donutlike enhancement appeared when the lesion showed wash-out. In 55.6% (10 of 18) of cases, the feeding artery was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Enlarged complete homogeneous hyperenhancement in the arterial phase, consequently followed by quick wash-out of the lesion and the appearance of donutlike enhancement, may be the CEUS features of HRLH.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound approach to the diagnosis of focal liver lesions: the importance of washout

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a powerful technique for differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs) without the risks of potential nephrotoxicity or ionizing radiation. In the diagnostic algorithm for FLLs on CEUS, washout is an important feature, as its presence is highly suggestive of malignancy and its characteristics are useful in distinguishing hepatocellular from nonhepatocellular malignancies. Interpreting washout on CEUS requires an understanding that microbubble contrast agents are strictly intravascular, unlike computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. This review explains the definition and types of washout on CEUS in accordance with the 2017 version of the CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and presents their applications to differential diagnosis with illustrative examples. Additionally, we propose potential mechanisms of rapid washout and describe the washout phenomenon in benign entities.

SIUMB guidelines and recommendations for the correct use of ultrasound in the management of patients with focal liver disease

The present document describes the SIUMB (Italian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) guidelines for the use of ultrasound in the management of focal liver disease. The aim of the paper is to provide a clinical practice guideline for Italian physicians who are approaching the ultrasound study of a focal liver lesion. In particular, these guidelines provide simple indications, recommendations and general practice advices for the correct use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this scenario. They represent the SIUMB position of the ultrasound role in the diagnostic flow charts of the principal focal liver lesions, and are in agreement with other, previously published national and international guidelines.

Comparison of international guidelines for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 update

The goal of this review is to present the similarities and differences among the latest guidelines for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) of Korea. In 2018, major guideline updates have been proposed by the AASLD, EASL and KLCA-NCC; AASLD newly incorporated LI-RADS into their HCC diagnostic algorithm. The AASLD and EASL guidelines now include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using hepatobiliary contrast media as a first-line diagnostic test in addition to dynamic computed tomography and MRI using extracellular contrast media and the KLCA-NCC and EASL guidelines also include contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a second-line diagnostic test. We will comprehensively review the HCC surveillance and diagnostic algorithms and compare and highlight key features for each guideline. We also address limitations of current systems for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC.

Enhancement Patterns of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Correlation with Clinicopathologic Findings and Prognosis

To evaluate the correlations between the enhancement pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and clinicopathologic findings and prognosis, a retrospective study was performed on 197 patients with mass-forming ICC who underwent pre-operative CEUS and surgical resection. The contrast medium we employed in CEUS was SonoVue, which contains microbubbles consisting of sulfur hexafluoride bubbles within a phospholipid shell. This study was approved by the institutional review board with informed consent waived. Patients were classified into an arterial rim-like enhancement group or an arterial non-rim-like enhancement group, and arterial enhancement patterns were correlated with clinicopathologic factors. Overall survival (OS) times were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for OS were used to evaluate the independent prognostic factors. The mean and range of ICC tumor size of the arterial rim-like group (59.41 ± 22.09 mm, 20-100 mm) were similar to those of the arterial non-rim-like group (59.82 ± 30.35 mm, 14-162 mm, p = 0.914). Arterial enhancement patterns were correlated with chronic viral hepatitis or cirrhosis, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and single/multiple tumors. A total of 78 patients (39.6%) exhibited arterial rim-like enhancement, and the other 119 patients (60.4%) exhibited arterial non-rim-like enhancement. Arterial enhancement pattern (p = 0.045), vascular invasion (p = 0.005), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.000) and number of tumors (p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The arterial non-rim-like enhancement pattern of ICC on CEUS is an independent prognostic factor for better OS and may offer new information for predicting the prognosis of ICC patients before surgical resection.

Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update

Gallbladder Carcinoma (GBCA) is the most common biliary tract malignancy. As the disease is often diagnosed clinically in an advanced stage, the survival rates are dismal. Imaging studies allow for an early diagnosis of malignancy, though the findings may be indistinguishable from non-malignant disease processes affecting the gallbladder. Attempts have been made to make a specific diagnosis of GBCA at an early stage on imaging studies. Ultrasonography (US) is the most commonly employed technique for gallbladder evaluation. Gallbladder wall thickening is the most common finding of early GBCA and in this context, US is non-specific. Recently, contrast enhanced ultrasound has been shown to be effective in differentiating benign from malignant disease. Multidetector computed tomography represents the most robust imaging technique in evaluation of GBCA. It provides relatively sensitive evaluation of mural thickening, though it is not entirely specific and issues in differentiating GBCA from xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis do arise. Due to its superior soft tissue resolution, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides excellent delineation of gallbladder and biliary tree involvement. When coupled with functional MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted and perfusion imaging, it provides a useful problem solving tool for interrogating the malignant potential of nonspecific gallbladder lesions and detection of metastases. Positron emission tomography has a role in detection of distant metastases and following patients following treatment for malignancy. We review the current role of various imaging modalities in evaluating patients with GBCA.

Characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is highly accurate in depicting the vascularity of liver nodules. The aim of this study was to verify the characteristics of CEUS in distinguishing small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).A total of 65 patients with a liver nodule (HCC, n = 58; ICC, n = 7) smaller than 3 cm who underwent liver CEUS and pathologic confirmation were retrospectively reviewed. CEUS findings were compared with histopathologic and clinical data.Arterial-phase hyperenhancement and portal-delayed-phase wash-out on CEUS were observed in 77.6% (45/58) of HCCs and 85.7% (6/7) of ICCs. Time of arterial-phase hyperenhancement (11 seconds [6-20] vs 16 seconds [14-19], P = .008), time of portal-delayed-phase wash-out (65 seconds (15-260) vs 35 secconds (27-54), P = .002), and time interval between arterial-phase hyperenhancement and portal-delayed-phase wash-out (50 seconds [5-249] vs 19 seconds [13-35], P < .001) on CEUS were significantly different between HCCs and ICCs showing arterial-phase hyperenhancement and portal-delayed-phase wash-out. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of time interval more than 25 seconds between arterial-phase hyperenhancement and portal-delayed-phase wash-out on CEUS for the differentiation of HCCs and ICCs were 91.1%, 83.3%, 97.6%, and 55.6%, respectively.The time interval between arterial-phase hyperenhancement and portal-delayed-phase wash-out on CEUS was the most sensitive indicator in distinguishing small HCC from ICC showing arterial-phase hyperenhancement and portal-delayed-phase wash-out.

Differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: A predictive model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

AIM

To develop a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) predictive model for distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of 88 consecutive high-risk patients with ICC and 88 high-risk patients with HCC selected by propensity score matching between May 2004 and July 2016. Patients were assigned to two groups, namely, a training set and validation set, at a 1:1 ratio. A CEUS score for diagnosing ICC was generated based on significant CEUS features. Then, a nomogram based on the CEUS score was developed, integrating the clinical data. The performance of the nomogram was then validated and compared with that of the LR-M of the CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS).

RESULTS

The most useful CEUS features for ICC were as follows: rim enhancement (64.5%), early washout (91.9%), intratumoral vein (58.1%), obscure boundary of intratumoral non-enhanced area (64.5%), and marked washout (61.3%, all P < 0.05). In the validation set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the CEUS score (AUC = 0.953) for differentiation between ICC and HCC was improved compared to the LI-RADS (AUC = 0.742) (P < 0.001). When clinical data were added, the CEUS score nomogram was superior to the LI-RADS nomogram (AUC: 0.973 vs 0.916, P = 0.036, Net Reclassification Improvement: 0.077, Integrated Discrimination Index: 0.152). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the CEUS score model was notably improved compared to the LI-RADS in tumors smaller than 5.0 cm (P < 0.05) but not improved in tumors smaller than 3.0 cm (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The CEUS predictive model for differentiation between ICC and HCC in high-risk patients had improved discrimination and clinical usefulness compared to the CEUS LI-RADS.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging is a recently approved technique in the United States that uses a specific contrast agent, namely, microbubbles, consisting mainly of a gas core and a stabilized biological shell. These compounds allow for the visualization of small vascular beds and improve characterization of anatomic structures and lesions. They have a relatively safe profile and are primarily excreted through the lungs.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention

The introduction of ultrasound contrast agents has rendered contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) a valuable complementary technique to address clinically significant problems. This pictorial review describes the use of CEUS guidance in abdominal intervention and illustrates such application for a range of clinical indications. Clinical application of CEUS discussed include commonly performed abdominal interventional procedures, such as biopsy, drainage, nephrostomy, biliary intervention, abdominal tumor ablation and its subsequent monitoring, and imaging of vascular complications following abdominal intervention. The purpose of this article is to further familiarize readers with the application of CEUS, particularly its specific strength over alternative imaging modalities, in abdominal intervention.

Practical advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominopelvic radiology

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two of the workhorse modalities of abdominopelvic radiology. However, these modalities are not without patient- and technique-specific limitations that may prevent a timely and accurate diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an effective, rapid, and cost-effective imaging modality with expanding clinical utility in the United States. In this pictorial essay, we provide a case-based discussion demonstrating the practical advantages of CEUS in evaluating a variety of pathologies in which CT or MRI was precluded or insufficient. Through these advantages, CEUS can serve a complementary role with CT and MRI in comprehensive abdominopelvic radiology.