Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically stable late pregnancy bleeding: beyond ultrasound

Imaging of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy and Puerperium-Part I: Obstetric (Non-Fetal) Complications

Acute abdominopelvic pain in pregnant and postpartum patients presents clinical and therapeutic challenges, often requiring quick and accurate imaging diagnosis. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be a powerful diagnostic tool in the setting of acute abdominal pain during pregnancy and puerperium. MRI overcomes some drawbacks of US, avoiding the ionizing radiation exposure of a computed tomography (CT) scan. Although CT is not usually appropriate in pregnant patients, it is crucial in the emergency evaluation of postpartum complications. The aim of this article is to provide radiologists with a thorough familiarity with the common and uncommon pregnancy and puerperium abdominal emergencies by illustrating their imaging appearances. The present first section will review and discuss the imaging findings for acute abdominopelvic pain of obstetric (non-fetal) etiology.

Subchorionic Hemorrhage in the Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy: A Review

Importance

Subchorionic hemorrhage (SCH) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy can be associated with maternal morbidity and fetal morbidity/mortality. Management of SCH in the second or third trimesters can be complicated, especially in the setting of a large SCH that requires hospitalization and blood transfusion.

Objective

The aim of this review is to describe SCH in second and third trimesters, risk factors, diagnosis, maternal and fetal outcomes, and management of this uncommon pregnancy complication.

Evidence Acquisition

A PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL search was undertaken with no limitations on the number of years searched.

Results

There were 123 abstracts and/or articles reviewed, with 48 articles being the basis of review. The only known risk factors for SCH are maternal factor deficiency and anticoagulation therapy. The diagnosis is usually made by ultrasound imaging. Subchorionic hemorrhage in second and third trimesters has been associated with several adverse fetal outcomes including preterm birth, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, fetal demise, and neonatal pulmonary morbidity. There is no proven treatment for SCH, although there are several investigational therapies reported.

Conclusions

Subchorionic hemorrhage can be complex and difficult to manage in the second and third trimesters. There are no recommendations or guidelines for management; however, serial growth ultrasounds, umbilical artery Doppler studies, and antenatal fetal testing should be considered particularly if the SCH is large or treatment requires a maternal blood transfusion.

Relevance

Subchorionic hemorrhage in the second and third trimester is associated with poor fetal outcomes and maternal morbidity, especially if the SCH is significant.

Assessment of placental abruption with diffusion-weighted imaging

AIM

To investigate whether placental abruption without fetal distress could be assessed by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study at a single center. ADC values at the lesions of placental abruption in the abruption group (n = 8) were compared to those in the control group (n = 32). In the abruption group, ADC values at the sites of abruption were also compared to those at the nonabruption sites within the same placenta.

RESULTS

The ADC values in the placental area above the abruption site in the abruption group showed lower values than those in the control group when the slice containing the umbilical cord insertion site was set as the reference, and those values were compared in each corresponding slice. Compared with average ADC values, those above the abruption site in the abruption group were also significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ADC values at the area above abruption were lower than those at the nonabruption area of all planes in the abruption group.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values at the lesions above the placental abruption site were reduced compared to those in the normal placenta and those in the nonabruption area. Thus, it would be helpful to understand the pathophysiology of placental abruption in expectant management, although further investigations would be needed.

Nonfetal Imaging During Pregnancy: Placental Disease

Placenta is a vital organ that connects the maternal and fetal circulations, allowing exchange of nutrients and gases between the two. In addition to the fetus, placenta is a key component to evaluate during any imaging performed during pregnancy. The most common disease processes involving the placenta include placenta accreta spectrum disorders and placental masses. Several systemic processes such as infection and fetal hydrops can too affect the placenta; however, their imaging features are nonspecific such as placental thickening, heterogeneity, and calcifications. Ultrasound is the first line of imaging during pregnancy, and MR imaging is reserved for problem solving, when there is need for higher anatomic resolution.

Placental abruption and hemorrhage-review of imaging appearance

Placental and periplacental bleeding are common etiologies for antepartum bleeding. Placental abruption complicates approximately 1% of pregnancies and is associated with increased maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This article reviews the normal placental appearance on ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and then discusses the different morphological appearance of placental and periplacental hematomas along with their mimics. Hematomas are classified based on the location as retroplacental, marginal subchorionic, preplacental (subamniotic), or intraplacental. Placenta-related bleeding is a common finding during first trimester ultrasound and its detection can help triage the pregnant females into low- and high-risk groups. This article reviews placenta related bleeding in the setting of trauma. Trauma can complicate pregnancy with potential severe maternal and fetal outcomes. CT is usually performed as part of the trauma workup and it can be challenging for placental evaluation. MRI can characterize the age of the hematomas and can differentiate hematomas from tumors.

T2-weighted balanced steady-state free procession MRI evaluated for diagnosing placental adhesion disorder in late pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the imaging characteristics and accuracy of T2-weighted (T2W) balanced steady-state free procession (b-SSFP) magnetic resonance imaging, relative to b-SSFP or single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE), for the diagnosis of placental adhesion disorder (PAD).

METHODS

Fifty-one pregnant patients suspected of PAD were examined with T2W b-SSFP, b-SSFP and SSFSE. The image types were independently analysed for signs of PAD: abnormal placental bulge (APB), dark intraplacental bands (DIB), placental heterogeneity (PH) and placental protrusion into adjacent structures (PPAS). The sequences were compared for muscle-to-placenta signal ratio, signs of PAD and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for diagnostic accuracy of PAD.

RESULTS

PAD was confirmed in 34 women. The muscle-to-placenta signal ratio was highest in the T2W b-SSFP. The diagnostic rates of APB in T2W b-SSFP were comparable to that of b-SSFP, but were significantly higher than that of SSFSE. The rates of PH in SSFE were comparable to that of b-SSFP, but both were significantly lower than that of T2W b-SSFP. The rates of DIB were significantly higher in T2W b-SSFP images compared with SSFSE. Rates of PPAS were comparable among three sequences. The AUCs of the T2W b-SSFP, b-SSFP and SSFSE were 0.966, 0.890 and 0.823, respectively.

CONCLUSION

T2W b-SSFP has high diagnostic accuracy for PAD relative to SSFSE or b-SSFP, which may be due to its high SNR, T2-weighting and lack of blur.

KEY POINTS

• Signal myometrium-to-placenta ratio was highest in the T2W b-SSFP images. • Diagnostic rate of APB in T2W b-SSFP was highest. • Diagnostic rate of DIB was higher in T2W b-SSFP than in SSFSE. • Diagnostic rate of PH in T2W b-SSFP was highest. • Maximum AUC for diagnostic accuracy of PAD was in T2W b-SSFP.

To evaluate the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting unusual site ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of pelvic MRI in the diagnosis of unusual ectopic pregnancy (EP), when ultrasound (US) examination is inconclusive.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 150 patients with suspected EP. Clinical, US and MRI features of 15 unusual EPs were analysed. Two radiologists independently reviewed each case resolving by consensus any diagnostic discrepancy. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the Cohen κ test.

RESULTS

MRI displayed a gestational sac-like structure surrounded by a thick wall in all cases. The thick wall displayed hyperintensity in 41 %, isointensity in 35 % and hypointensity in 24 % of cases on T1-weighted images. Diffusion- and fat saturation T1-weighted images were the most accurate sequences, as they enabled identification of 15/15 and 14/15 patients, respectively. Although US was false negative in detecting cervical and uterine infiltration underlying the caesarean scar, MRI was able to identify the invasion. Interobserver agreement was very good for all sequences (κ=0.892-1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI plays an important role in the early diagnosis of unusual EP. It should be considered after negative US findings, providing accurate evaluation of the site and the possible infiltration of these lesions, which help in the management of these patients.

KEY POINTS

• MRI is being increasingly used as a problem-solving modality in ectopic pregnancy. • MRI plays an important role in early diagnosis of unusual ectopic pregnancy. • Knowledge of MRI features in EP is essential to determinate appropriate management.

The gravid uterus: MR imaging and reporting of abnormal placentation

Appropriate placentation is critical to maternal and fetal outcomes. Abnormal placentation, including placenta previa and morbidly adherent placenta, is increasing in incidence and is associated with multiple risk factors including advanced maternal age and history of prior cesarean delivery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in assessing the type and extent of abnormal placentation, often leading to modifications in surgical approach. Here, we review the MRI features and appropriate reporting of placenta previa and the placenta accreta spectrum.

Magnetic resonance imaging - A troubleshooter in obstetric emergencies: A pictorial review

The application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pregnancy faced initial skepticism of physicians because of fetal safety concerns. The perceived fetal risk has been found to be unwarranted and of late, the modality has attained acceptability. Its role in diagnosing fetal anomalies is well recognized and following its safety certification in pregnancy, it is finding increasing utilization during pregnancy and puerperium. However, the use of MRI in maternal emergency obstetric conditions is relatively limited as it is still evolving. In early gestation, ectopic implantation is one of the major life-threatening conditions that are frequently encountered. Although ultrasound (USG) is the accepted mainstay modality, the diagnostic predicament persists in many cases. MRI has a role where USG is indeterminate, particularly in the extratubal ectopic pregnancy. Later in gestation, MRI can be a useful adjunct in placental disorders like previa, abruption, and adhesion. It is a good problem-solving tool in adnexal masses such as ovarian torsion and degenerated fibroid, which have a higher incidence during pregnancy. Catastrophic conditions like uterine rupture can also be preoperatively and timely diagnosed. MRI has a definite role to play in postpartum and post-abortion life-threatening conditions, e.g., retained products of conception, and gestational trophoblastic disease, especially when USG is inconclusive or inadequate.

Magnetic resonance imaging of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy

Evaluation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy presents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and radiologists alike. The differential diagnosis includes obstetric and nonobstetric conditions unique to pregnancy, in addition to causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain unrelated to the pregnancy. The clinical presentation and course of disease may be altered in pregnancy, and several pathologies are exacerbated by pregnancy. Discriminating clinical features in the diagnosis of abdominal and pelvic pain are often confounded by expected anatomic and physiologic changes in pregnancy. Moreover, while diagnostic pathways may be altered in pregnancy, the necessity for a timely and accurate diagnosis must be underscored, as delay in treatment may result in an undesirable increase in morbidity and/or mortality for both the patient and fetus. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) through faster acquisition and motion-insensitive techniques, coupled with increased awareness and education regarding the value of MRI in diagnosing a wide range of pathology, have established MRI as a valuable strategy in the investigation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in the pregnant patient. This review presents a practical approach to common obstetric and nonobstetric causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain during pregnancy, as well as safety considerations for performing MRI in this patient population.

Imaging for acute pelvic pain in pregnancy

Acute pelvic pain in pregnancy presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Standard imaging techniques need to be adapted to reduce harm to the foetus from X-rays because of their teratogenic and carcinogenic potential. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation of the pregnant abdomen. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of gynaecological and obstetric problems during pregnancy and in the setting of acute abdomen during pregnancy. MRI overcomes some of the limitations of ultrasound, mainly the size of the gravid uterus. MRI poses theoretical risks to the foetus and care must be taken to minimise these with the avoidance of contrast agents. Teaching Points • Ultrasound and MRI are the preferred investigations for acute pelvic pain during pregnancy. • Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation because of availability and portability. • MRI helps differentiate causes of acute pelvic pain when ultrasound is inconclusive.

MR imaging of the placenta: what a radiologist should know

Imaging of the placenta can have a profound impact on patient management, owing to the morbidity and mortality associated with various placental conditions. Placental conditions affecting the mother and fetus include molar pregnancies, placental hematoma, abruption, previa, accreta, vasa previa, chorioangioma, and retained products of conception. Although uncommon, abnormalities of the placenta are important to recognize owing to the potential for maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Sonography remains the first imaging modality for evaluation of the placenta. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has many unique properties that make it well-suited for imaging of the placenta: the multi-planar capabilities, the improved tissue contrast that can be obtained using a variety of pulse sequences and parameters and the lack of ionizing radiation; MR imaging can be of added diagnostic value when further characterization is required. In this article, we review the appearances and the role of MRI in diagnosis and management of these conditions. We present our clinical perspective on diagnosing these challenging problems with MRI and review the imaging findings that can lead to a correct diagnosis.

Spontaneous intraamniotic hemorrhage in the second trimester mimicking an abdominal wall defect

We report here a case of spontaneous intraamniotic haemorrhage in the second trimester which mimicked an abdominal wall defect. The ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings are discussed and a review of the literature regarding differential diagnosis of bleeding and abdominal wall defects is made.

MRI of the placenta - a short review

While ultrasound is still the gold standard method of placental investigation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has certain benefits. In advanced gestational age, obese women, and posterior placental location, MRI is advantageous due to the larger field of view and its multiplanar capabilities. Some pathologies are seen more clearly in MRI, such as infarctions and placental invasive disorders. The future development is towards functional placental MRI. Placental MRI has become an important complementary method for evaluation of placental anatomy and pathologies contributing to fetal problems such as intrauterine growth restriction.