Appearance of hepatocellular adenomas on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

Subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas using Gd-EOB-DTPA: a qualitative and quantitative analysis

BACKGROUND

The goal of medical imaging is not only to identify the entity "hepatocellular adenoma," but to detect typical magnetic resonance (MR) patterns of the subtypes so that lesions with a higher malignant transformation rate could be differentiated from those that should just be controlled.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differentiation between subtypes of hepatocellular adenomas using hepatobiliary specific contrast agent (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in MR imaging.

MATERIAL/METHODS

A total of 11 patients with 39 lesions with histologically proven hepatocellular adenomas were evaluated. Of the, 34 were inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas (IHCA) and 5 were HNF1α adenomas. No β-catenin-mutated adenoma was found. In all patients, a standard protocol considering the guidelines of the international consensus conference of Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed in a 1.5-T scanner. Besides a qualitative analysis of all sequences, we measured the quantitative signal intensity (SI) ratio in all examinations.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis showed that best sequences for differentiation of HNF1α adenomas from IHCA were T1-weighted (T1W) precontrast (P = 0.03) and portalvenous phase (P < 0.0001) as well as arterial phase (P = 0.002). All adenomas were hypointense in hepatobiliary phase (15 min). The quantitative analyses of the SI ratio and of lesion-to-liver contrast (LLC) ratio show statistically significant differences in T1W precontrast (SI: P = 0.035; LLC: P = 0.049) and portalvenous phase (SI: P = 0.002; LLC: P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas using Gd-EOB-DTPA is possible due to qualitative and quantitative analyses regarding T1W precontrast and portalvenous phase. In addition, the SI ratio and liver-to-lesion contrast ratio in the arterial phase gave additional qualitative information for differentiation.

HBP-enhancing hepatocellular adenomas and how to discriminate them from FNH in Gd-EOB MRI

BACKGROUND

Recent studies provide evidence that hepatocellular  adenomas  (HCAs) frequently take up gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB) during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The purpose of our study was to investigate how to differentiate between Gd-EOB-enhancing HCAs and focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs). We therefore retrospectively included 40 HCAs classified as HBP Gd-EOB-enhancing lesions from a sample of 100 histopathologically proven HCAs in 65 patients. These enhancing HCAs were matched retrospectively with 28 FNH lesions (standard of reference: surgical resection). Two readers (experienced abdominal radiologists blinded to clinical data) reviewed the images evaluating morphologic features and subjectively scoring Gd-EOB uptake (25-50%, 50-75% and 75-100%) for each lesion. Quantitative lesion-to-liver enhancement was measured in arterial, portal venous (PV), transitional and HBP. Additionally, multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Subjective scoring of intralesional Gd-EOB uptake showed the highest discriminatory accuracies (AUC: 0.848 (R#1); 0.920 (R#2)-p < 0.001) with significantly higher uptake scores assigned to FNHs (Cut-off: 75%-100%). Typical lobulation and presence of a central scar in FNH achieved an accuracy of 0.750 or higher in at least one reader (lobulation-AUC: 0.809 (R#1); 0.736 (R#2); central scar-AUC: 0.595 (R#1); 0.784 (R#2)). The multivariate regression emphasized the discriminatory power of the Gd-EOB scoring (p = 0.001/OR:22.15 (R#1) and p < 0.001/OR:99.12 (R#2). The lesion-to-liver ratio differed significantly between FNH and HCA in the PV phase and HBP (PV: 132.9 (FNH) and 110.2 (HCA), p = 0.048 and HBP: 110.3 (FNH) and 39.2 (HCA), p < 0.001)), while the difference was not significant in arterial and transitional contrast phases (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Even in HBP-enhancing HCA, characterization of Gd-EOB uptake was found to provide the strongest discriminatory power in differentiating HCA from FNH. Furthermore, a lobulated appearance and a central scar are more frequently seen in FNH than in HCA.

Spectrum of liver lesions hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase: an approach by clinical setting

Hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents are increasingly being used for liver imaging. In clinical practice, most focal liver lesions do not uptake hepatobiliary contrast agents. Less commonly, hepatic lesions may show variable signal characteristics on hepatobiliary phase. This pictorial essay reviews a broad spectrum of benign and malignant focal hepatic observations that may show hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase in various clinical settings. In non-cirrhotic patients, focal hepatic observations that show hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase are usually benign and typically include focal nodular hyperplasia. In patients with primary or secondary vascular disorders, focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions arise as a local hyperplastic response to vascular alterations and tend to be iso- or hyperintense in the hepatobiliary phase. In oncologic patients, metastases and cholangiocarcinoma are hypointense lesions in the hepatobiliary phase; however, occasionally they may show a diffuse, central and inhomogeneous hepatobiliary paradoxical uptake with peripheral rim hypointensity. Post-chemotherapy focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions may be tricky, and their typical hyperintense rim in the hepatobiliary phase is very helpful for the differential diagnosis with metastases. In cirrhotic patients, hepatocellular carcinoma may occasionally appear hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase.

Does Hepatic Steatosis Influence the Detection Rate of Metastases in the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI?

The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the influence of hepatic steatosis on the detection rate of metastases in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 50 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (unenhanced T1w in- and opposed-phase, T2w fat sat, unenhanced 3D-T1w fat sat and 3-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced (uDP), 3D-T1w fat sat hepatobiliary phase (HP)) were retrospectively included. Two blinded observers (O1/O2) independently assessed the images to determine the detection rate in uDP and HP. The hepatic signal fat fraction (HSFF) was determined as the relative signal intensity reduction in liver parenchyma from in- to opposed-phase images. A total of 451 liver metastases were detected (O1/O2, n = 447/411). O1/O2 detected 10.9%/9.3% of lesions exclusively in uDP and 20.2%/15.5% exclusively in HP. Lesions detected exclusively in uDP were significantly associated with a larger HSFF (area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, 0.93; p < 0.001; cutoff, 41.5%). The exclusively HP-positive lesions were significantly associated with a smaller diameter (ROC-AUC, 0.82; p < 0.001; cutoff, 5 mm) and a smaller HSFF (ROC-AUC, 0.61; p < 0.001; cutoff, 13.3%). Gadoxetic acid imaging has the advantage of detecting small occult metastatic liver lesions in the HP. However, using non-optimized standard fat-saturated 3D-T1w protocols, severe steatosis (HSFF > 30%) is a potential pitfall for the detection of metastases in HP.

Hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase can be used as a biomarker of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of hepatospecific MR contrast agent uptake on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images to detect marked activation of the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs).

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective IRB-approved study included all patients with a pathologically proven HCA who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI with HBP. Tumor signal intensity on HBP was first assessed visually, and lesions were classified into three distinct groups-hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense-according to the relative signal intensity to liver. Uptake was then quantified using the lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER). Finally, the accuracy of HBP analysis in depicting marked β-catenin activation in HCA was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 124 HCAs were analyzed including 12 with marked β-catenin activation (HCA B+). Visual analysis classified 94/124 (76%), 12/124 (10%), and 18/124 (14%) HCAs as being hypointense, isointense, and hyperintense on HBP, respectively. Of these, 1/94 (1%), 3/12 (25%), and 8/18 (44%) were HCA B+, respectively (p < 0.001). The LLCER of HCA B+ was higher than that of HCA without marked β-catenin activation in the entire cohort (means 4.9 ± 11.8% vs. - 19.8 ± 11.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). A positive LLCER, i.e., LLCER ≥ 0%, had 75% (95% CI 43-95%) sensitivity and 97% (95% CI 92-99%) specificity, with a LR+ of 28 (95% CI 8.8-89.6) for the diagnosis of HCA B+.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatospecific contrast uptake on hepatobiliary phase is strongly associated with marked activation of the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular adenoma, and its use might improve hepatocellular adenoma subtyping on MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Tumor uptake on hepatobiliary phase in both the visual and quantitative analyses had a specificity higher than 90% for the detection of marked β-catenin activation in hepatocellular adenoma. • However, the sensitivity of visual analysis alone is inferior to that of LLCER quantification on HBP due to the high number of HCAs with signal hyperintensity on HBP, especially those developed on underlying liver steatosis.

MRI characterization of focal liver lesions in non-cirrhotic patients: assessment of added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase imaging

Background

To evaluate the added value of the hepatobiliary (HPB) phase in gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing newly discovered indeterminate focal liver lesions in non-cirrhotic patients.

Results

One-hundred and twenty-five non-cirrhotic patients (median age, 46 years; range, 20–85 years; 100 females) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, including the 20-min delayed HPB phase, for characterization of newly discovered focal liver lesions. Images were independently evaluated by two blinded, board-certified abdominal radiologists (R1 and R2) who characterized liver lesions without and with assessment of the HPB phase images in two separate readout sessions. Confidence in diagnosis was scored on a scale from 0 to 3. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen κ statistics. Change in diagnosis and confidence in diagnosis were evaluated by Wilcoxon signed rank test. There was no significant change in diagnosis before and after evaluation of the HPB phase for both readers (p = 1.0 for R1; p = 0.34 for R2). Confidence in diagnosis decreased from average 2.8 ± 0.45 to 2.6 ± 0.59 for R1 and increased from 2.6 ± 0.83 to 2.8 ± 0.46 for R2. Change in confidence was only statistically significant for R1 (p = 0.003) but not significant for R2 (p = 0.49). Inter-reader agreement in diagnosis was good without (k = 0.66) and with (k = 0.75) inclusion of the HPB phase images.

Conclusions

The added information obtained from the HPB phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI does not change the diagnosis or increase confidence in diagnosis when evaluating new indeterminate focal liver lesions in non-cirrhotic patients.

A systematic review on the complications and management of hepatic adenomas: a call for a new approach

Hepatic adenomas are benign hepatic lesions with heterogeneous characteristics. Awareness of complications, including haemorrhage and malignant transformation, has improved alongside a concurrent rise in their detection. Monitoring and management guidelines, however, remain inconsistent. This systematic review analyses the natural history of hepatic adenomas, and existing and novel risk factors associated with haemorrhage and malignant transformation. Results of this systematic review commonly identified male sex, and the beta-catenin histopathological hepatic adenoma subtype, as risk factors for malignant transformation, whilst those associated with haemorrhage included lesion size and number, exophytic nature, and recent hormone use. Overall, females demonstrated higher rates of haemorrhage, whilst males exhibited a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development. This systematic review highlights that tumour size and subtype may not be as characteristically linked with complications as previously thought. We have additionally reported novel risk factors contributing to development of hepatic adenoma-related complications. We conclude by highlighting the risk of taking a conservative approach to seemingly low-risk lesions and suggest revised practice guidelines.

Hepatocellular adenomas: is there additional value in using Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI for subtype differentiation?

Purpose

To differentiate subtypes of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) based on enhancement characteristics in gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight patients with 79 histopathologically proven HCAs who underwent Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI were enrolled (standard of reference: surgical resection). Two blinded radiologists performed quantitative measurements (lesion-to-liver enhancement) and evaluated qualitative imaging features. Inter-reader variability was tested. Advanced texture analysis was used to evaluate lesion heterogeneity three-dimensionally.

Results

Overall, there were 19 (24%) hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1a-mutated (HHCAs), 37 (47%) inflammatory (IHCAs), 5 (6.5%) b-catenin-activated (bHCA), and 18 (22.5%) unclassified (UHCAs) adenomas. In the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), 49.5% (39/79) of all adenomas were rated as hypointense and 50.5% (40/79) as significantly enhancing (defined as > 25% intralesional GD-EOB uptake). 82.5% (33/40) of significantly enhancing adenomas were IHCAs, while only 4% (1/40) were in the HHCA subgroup (p < 0.001). When Gd-EOB uptake behavior was considered in conjunction with established MRI features (binary regression model), the area under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.785 to 0.953 for differentiation of IHCA (atoll sign + hyperintensity), from 0.859 to 0.903 for bHCA (scar + hyperintensity), and from 0.899 to 0.957 for HHCA (steatosis + hypointensity). Three-dimensional region of interest (3D ROI) analysis showed significantly increased voxel heterogeneity for IHCAs (p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Gd-EOB MRI is of added value for subtype differentiation of HCAs and reliably identifies the typical heterogeneous HBP uptake of IHCAs. Diagnostic accuracy can be improved significantly by the combined analysis of established morphologic MR appearances and intralesional Gd-EOB uptake.

Key Points

•Gd-EOB-enhanced MRI is of added value for subtype differentiation of HCA.

•IHCA and HHCA can be identified reliably based on their typical Gd-EOB uptake patterns, and accuracy increases significantly when additionally taking established MR appearances into account.

•The small numbers of bHCAs and UHCAs remain the source of diagnostic uncertainty.

Enhancement pattern of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on MR imaging performed with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus other Gd-based contrast agents (GBCAs): An intraindividual comparison

PURPOSE

To conduct an intraindividual comparison of the enhancement pattern of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on dynamic MRI study obtained following the injection of Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and other gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).

METHOD

This is a retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study conducted in a single institution. A search of medical records between 2008 and 2017 revealed 17 patients (all females) with at least one pathologically-proven HCA who underwent liver MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA and another GBCA within 1 year. Enhancement of each lesion on hepatic arterial (HAP), portal venous (PVP), 2 min and 4-5 minutes phases was subjectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists. Lesions were categorized as hyper-, iso- or hypointense compared to the surrounding liver parenchyma. The presence of a peripheral pseudocapsule was also recorded. The differences in lesion enhancement were assessed using the McNemar Test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The final population included 35 HCAs (83% inflammatory subtype). There was no significant difference in lesion size (P = 0.708) and enhancement on HAP (P = 0.625) or PVP (P = 0.125). HCAs showed more frequently hypointensity on 2 min (13/35 vs. 1/35, P < 0.001) and 4-5 minutes (P < 0.001) images obtained after injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA compared to those obtained after other GBCAs. A pseudocapsule was more frequently noted after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA (13/35 vs 1/35, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement pattern of HCA differs significantly after the injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA compared to other GBCAs. Lesion hypointensity on 2 min and 4-5 minutes images is more frequent when using Gd-EOB-DTPA.

OATPB1/B3 and MRP3 expression in hepatocellular adenoma predicts Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake and correlates with risk of malignancy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has increased the accuracy in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). However, the ability of this technique to distinguish HCA subtypes remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of hepatocyte transporters (OATPB1/B3, MRP2, MRP3) in HCA subtypes, hence to understand their MRI signal intensity on HBP Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

By means of immunohistochemistry (IHC), we scored the expression of OATPB1/B3, MRP2 and MRP3, in resected specimens of FNH (n = 40), subtyped HCA (n = 58) and HCA with focal malignant transformation (HCA-HCC, n = 4). Results were validated on a supplementary set of FNH (n = 6), subtyped HCA (n = 17) and HCA-HCC (n = 1) with Gd-EOB-DTPA MR images.

RESULTS

All FNH showed a preserved expression of hepatocytes transporters. Beta-catenin-activated HCA (at highest risk of malignant transformation) and HCA-HCC were characterized by preserved/increased OATPB1/B3 expression (predictor of hyperintensity on HBP), as opposed to other HCA subtypes (P < 0.01) that mostly showed OATPB1/B3 absence (predictor of hypointensity on HBP). HCA-HCC showed an additional MRP3 overexpressed profile (P < 0.01). On HBP Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, FNH and HCA signal intensity reflected the profile predicted by their specific OATPB1/B3 tissue expression. The hyperintense vs hypointense HBP signal criterion was able to distinguish all higher risk HCA and HCA-HCC (100% accuracy).

CONCLUSIONS

OATPB1/B3 and MRP3 IHC and signal intensity on HBP Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI can help to stratify HCA according to their risk of malignant transformation.

Inflammatory hepatic adenomas: Characterization with hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents

PURPOSE

To characterize the MRI appearance of inflammatory hepatic adenomas using hepatobiliary contrast agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI was performed using hepatobiliary contrast agents (3 with gadobenate dimeglumine and 24 with gadoxetic acid) in 27 patients with immunohistochemistry-confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory hepatic adenoma. The appearance of the lesions on T2 and diffusion-weighted images, pre-gadolinium T1-weighted images, dynamic post-gadolinium images, and hepatobiliary phase images was assessed.

RESULTS

Seven lesions (26%) showed predominant hyperenhancement on hepatobiliary phase images in comparison with adjacent hepatic parenchyma: 1 lesion showed diffuse, mildly heterogeneous hyperenhancement, and the remaining 6 lesions showed peripheral hyperenhancement and central hypoenhancement. Twenty lesions (74%) were predominantly hypoenhancing compared to adjacent liver on hepatobiliary phase images. Nine lesions showed a pattern of peripheral hyperenhancement and central hypoenhancement on hepatobiliary phase images; in 6 of these lesions a majority of the mass appeared hyperenhancing, while the remaining 3 lesions showed predominant hypoenhancement.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation shows that a significant percentage of inflammatory hepatic adenomas appear isointense or hyperintense in comparison to adjacent normal liver on hepatobiliary phase images, and therefore this feature should not be used to distinguish hepatic adenomas from focal nodular hyperplasia without additional supporting evidence.

Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma

Objectives

To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs).

Results

The T1_P of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1_P, T1_E, T1_D and T1_D% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1_D% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1_P, T1_E, and T1_D%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%.

Materials and Methods

74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1_P) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1_E). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1_D) and the percentage reduction (T1_D%) was calculated. The differences of T1_P, T1_E, T1_D and T1_D% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated.

Conclusions

Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping.

Diagnosis and treatment of benign liver nodules: Brazilian Society of Hepatology (SBH) recommendations

Space-occupying lesions of the liver may be cystic or solid. Ultrasonography is an extremely useful method for initial screening, and suffices for diagnosis of simple hepatic cysts. Complex cysts and solid masses require computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for confirmation. Wide surgical excision is indicated in cystadenoma or cystadenocarcinoma. Clinical and epidemiological data are important, as nodules in noncirrhotic livers are more likely to be benign. Hemangiomas, the most common benign tumors, require no follow-up after diagnostic confirmation if they are small and asymptomatic. Patients with giant, symptomatic hemangiomas or compression of adjacent structures should be referred to hepatobiliary centers for potential surgery. The genetic heterogeneity of hepatocellular adenomas and their epidemiology and prognosis prompted classification of these tumors into four subtypes based on histology and immunohistochemistry. The major complications of hepatocellular adenomas are rupture with bleeding and malignant transformation. Rupture occurs in approximately 30% of cases. The main risk factors are tumors size >5 cm and inflammatory subtype. Hepatocellular adenomas may enlarge during pregnancy due to marked hormonal stimulation. As oral contraceptive pills and anabolic steroids have associated with hepatocellular adenomas growth, particularly of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alfa subtype, these drugs should be discontinued. Focal nodular hyperplasia is the second most common benign tumor of the liver. It is most frequent in women aged 20 to 60, and 70% to 90% of cases are asymptomatic. In the absence of a central scar and/or other hallmarks of Focal nodular hyperplasia, with uncertainty between this diagnosis and hepatocellular adenoma, liver-specific contrast agents are indicated.

Consensus report from the 7th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objectives

Liver-specific MRI is a fast-growing field, with technological and protocol advancements providing more robust imaging and allowing a greater depth of information per examination. This article reports the evidence for, and expert thinking on, current challenges in liver-specific MRI, as discussed at the 7th International Forum for Liver MRI, which was held in Shanghai, China, in October 2013.

Methods

Topics discussed included the role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (in patients with chronic liver disease), the differentiation of low-grade dysplastic nodule (DN) from pre-malignant high-grade DN and early HCC, and treatment planning and assessment of treatment response for patients with HCC and colorectal liver metastasis. Optimization of the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol to gain robust arterial and hepatobiliary phase images was also discussed.

Results and conclusions

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrates added value for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions and shows promise in a number of new indications, including regional liver functional assessment and patient monitoring after therapy; however, more data are needed in some areas, and further developments are needed to translate cutting-edge techniques into clinical practice.

Key Points

• Liver-specific MRI is a fast-growing field, with many technological and protocol advancements.

• Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI demonstrates value for detecting and characterizing focal liver lesions.

• Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI shows promise in regional functional assessment and patient monitoring.

• Further developments are needed to translate cutting-edge techniques into clinical practice.

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma: Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging--A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hepatobiliary (HPB) phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging of the liver in the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) versus hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and to identify the rate of (a) reported HCAs that are iso- or hyperintense to liver and (b) reported FNHs that are hypointense to liver on HPB phase MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study type, and multiple databases were searched for studies in which researchers distinguished between FNH and HCA with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy were included; case reports and series were included to analyze the rate of iso- or hyperintense HCAs on HPB phase MR images. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Sensitivity and specificity were plotted with a forest plot; pooling was not performed because a small number of heterogeneous studies were included. Rate of iso- or hyperintense HCA on HPB phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images was evaluated.

RESULTS

Six studies (309 patients; 164 with HCA, 233 with FNH) were included for diagnostic accuracy assessment. Twelve case series (129 patients; 81 with HCA, 70 with FNH) were included (studies with insufficient 2 × 2 table data for diagnostic accuracy assessment). Sensitivity was high (range, 0.91-1.00; lower margin of the 95% confidence interval: 0.77). Specificity was high (range, 0.87-1.00; lower margin of the 95% confidence interval: 0.54). Specificity was lowest among studies in which molecular subtyping of HCA was performed. Rate of iso-or hyperintensity of HCA on HPB phase MR images was variable (range, 0%-67%) and occurred more frequently in the inflammatory subtype. High risk of bias was identified in the domains of patient selection and reference standard.

CONCLUSION

The reported diagnostic accuracy of HPB phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in the diagnosis of HCA versus FNH is high; however, studies are few, heterogeneous, and at high risk for bias, indicating that diagnostic accuracy may be overestimated.

Morphologic and Molecular Features of Hepatocellular Adenoma with Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of imaging features of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to differentiate among hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtypes by using the histopathologic results of the new immunophenotype and genotype classification and to correlate the enhancement pattern on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) with the degrees of expression of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1B1/3), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP) (MRP2), and MRP 3 (MRP3) transporters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent waived. MR imaging findings of 29 patients with 43 HCAs were assessed by two radiologists independently then compared with the histopathologic analysis as the standard of reference. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Spearman rank correlation coefficient were used to test the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging features, which included the retention or washout at HBP and degree of transporter expression. Interreader agreement was assessed by using the κ statistic with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for the diagnosis of inflammatory HCA was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.64, 0.90); for the steatotic type, it was 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 0.97); and for the β-catenin type, it was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.95). There were no imaging features that showed a significant statistical correlation for the diagnosis of unclassified HCAs. On immunohistochemical staining, OATP1B1/3 expression was the main determinant for the retention, whereas MRP3 was the key determinant for washout of gadoxetic acid at HBP (P < .001). MRP2 appeared to have no role.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging features may suggest the subtype of HCA. The degree of OATP1B1/3 and MRP3 expression correlated statistically with gadoxetic acid retention and washout, respectively, in the HBP.

Respiratory motion artefacts in dynamic liver MRI: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of respiratory motion artefacts in patients undergoing dynamic liver magnetic resonance (MR) either with gadoxetate disodium or gadobutrol.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty liver MR studies (115 with gadobutrol, 115 with gadoxetate disodium) were analysed. Respiratory motion artefacts on dynamic 3D T1-weighted MR images (pre-contrast, arterial, venous, and late-dynamic phase) were assessed using a five-point rating scale. Severe motion was defined as a score ≥ 4. Mean motion scores were compared with the Mann-Whitney-U-test. The chi-squared-test was used for dichotomous comparisons.

RESULTS

Mean motion scores for gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol showed no relevant differences for each phase of the dynamic contrast series (pre-contrast: 1.85 ± 0.70 vs. 1.88 ± 0.57, arterial: 1.85 ± 0.81 vs. 1.87 ± 0.74, venous: 1.82 ± 0.67 vs. 1.74 ± 0.64, late-dynamic: 1.75 ± 0.62 vs. 1.79 ± 0.63; p = 0.469, 0.557, 0.382 and 0.843, respectively). Severe motion artefacts had a similar incidence using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol (11/460 [2.4%] vs. 7/460 [1.5%]; p = 0.341).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoxetate disodium is associated with equivalent motion scores compared to gadobutrol in dynamic liver MRI. In addition, both contrast agents demonstrated a comparable and acceptable rate of severe respiratory motion artefacts.

KEY POINTS

• Gadobutrol and gadoxetate disodium showed comparable motion scores in dynamic phase imaging. • The incidence of severe motion artefacts was pronounced in arterial phase imaging. • Adverse respiratory side effects were not recorded in 115 examinations with gadoxetate disodium.

The role of gadoxetic acid as a paramagnetic contrast medium in the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions: a review

Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of paramagnetic hepatobiliary contrast agents in the acquisition of magnetic resonance images remarkably improves the detection and differentiation of focal liver lesions, as compared with extracellular contrast agents. Paramagnetic hepatobiliary contrast agents initially show the perfusion of the lesions, as do extracellular agents, but delayed contrast-enhanced images can demonstrate contrast uptake by functional hepatocytes, providing further information for a better characterization of the lesions. Additionally, this intrinsic characteristic increases the accuracy in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas and metastases, particularly the small-sized ones. Recently, a hepatobiliary contrast agent called gadolinium ethoxybenzyl dimeglumine, that is simply known as gadoxetic acid, was approved by the National Health Surveillance Agency for use in humans. The authors present a literature review and a practical approach of magnetic resonance imaging utilizing gadoxetic acid as contrast agent, based on patients' images acquired during their initial experiment.

Imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: current concepts and recent updates

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are a variety of solid lesions mostly found in the absence of underlying chronic liver disease in young patients. HCA is no longer to be considered as a unique lesion but as a recollection of different entities sharing common points but most of all separated by different typical morphological aspects. Accurate diagnosis is of clinical importance as the management is most of the time conservative for FNH, whereas HCAs expose patients to hemorrhage and malignant transformation, and may lead to a more invasive treatment, mainly surgical resection. Moreover, the different HCA subtypes expose to different risks of complication. The best imaging techniques for the differentiation between FNH and HCAs and for the subtyping of HCAs are contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as specific combinations of imaging features have been associated with the different lesions. They should be considered as complementary examinations. Atypical or multiple lesions, lesions containing fat or presence of an associated steatosis represent diagnostic challenges. Recently, MR hepatospecific contrast agents have been shown to be useful. Emergent elastography techniques might also be helpful in the near future. Biopsy should always be performed in case of uncertain diagnosis to reach a final diagnosis and avoid unnecessary invasive treatment.

Gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI for differentiation of FNH and HCA: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of enhancement characteristics of histopathologically confirmed focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) and hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with 115 histopathologically proven lesions (FNHs, n=44; HCAs, n=71) examined with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively enrolled (standard of reference: surgical resection, n=53 patients (lesions: FNHs, n=37; HCAs, n=53); biopsy, n=15 (lesions: FNHs, n=7; HCAs, n=18)). Two radiologists evaluated all MR images regarding morphological features as well as the vascular and hepatocyte-specific enhancement in consensus.

RESULTS

For the hepatobiliary phase, relative enhancement of the lesions and lesion to liver enhancement were significantly lower for HCAs (mean, 48.7 (±48.4)%and 49.4 (±33.9) %) compared to FNHs (159.3 (±92.5) %; and 151.7 (±79) %; accuracy of 89%and 90 %, respectively; P<0.001). Visual strong uptake of FNHs vs. hypointensity of HCAs in the hepatobiliary phase resulted in an accuracy of 92 %. This parameter was superior to all other morphological and dynamic vascular criteria alone and in combination (accuracy, 54–85 %).

CONCLUSIONS

For differentiation of FNHs and HCAs by means of MRI, gadoxetic acid uptake in the hepatobiliary phase was found to be superior to all other criteria alone and in combination.

KEY POINTS

EOB-MRI is well suited to differentiate FNHs and hepatocellular adenomas. For this purpose hepatobiliary phase is superior to unenhanced and dynamic imaging. Hepatobiliary phase (peripheral) hyper- or isointensity is typical for FNH. Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity is typical for hepatocellular adenomas. EOB-MRI helps to avoid misinterpretations of benign hepatocellular lesions.

Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective

Liver masses present a relatively common clinical dilemma, particularly with the increasing use of various imaging modalities in the diagnosis of abdominal and other symptoms. The accurate and reliable determination of the nature of the liver mass is critical, not only to reassure individuals with benign lesions but also, and perhaps more importantly, to ensure that malignant lesions are diagnosed correctly. This avoids the devastating consequences of missed diagnosis and the delayed treatment of malignancy or the unnecessary treatment of benign lesions. With appropriate interpretation of the clinical history and physical examination, and the judicious use of laboratory and imaging studies, the majority of liver masses can be characterized noninvasively. Accurate characterization of liver masses by cross-sectional imaging is particularly dependent on an understanding of the unique phasic vascular perfusion of the liver and the characteristic behaviors of different lesions during multiphasic contrast imaging. When noninvasive characterization is indeterminate, a liver biopsy may be necessary for definitive diagnosis. Standard histologic examination usually is complemented by immunohistochemical analysis of protein biomarkers. Accurate diagnosis allows the appropriate selection of optimal management, which is frequently reassurance or intermittent follow-up evaluations for benign masses. For malignant lesions or those at risk of malignant transformation, management depends on the tumor staging, the functional status of the uninvolved liver, and technical surgical considerations. Unresectable metastatic masses require oncologic consultation and therapy. The efficient characterization and management of liver masses therefore requires a multidisciplinary collaboration between the gastroenterologist/hepatologist, radiologist, pathologist, hepatobiliary or transplant surgeon, and medical oncologist.

Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

Since its clinical introduction, several studies in literature have investigated gadolinium ethoxybenzhyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid or gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) properties. Following contrast injection, it provides dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal and equilibrium phases) and hepatobiliary phase, the latter due to its uptake by functional hepatocytes. The main advantages of Gd-EOB-DTPA of focal liver lesion detection and characterization are discussed in this paper. Namely, we focus on the possibility of distinguishing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatic adenoma (HA), the identification of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the pre-operative assessment of metastasis in liver parenchyma. Regarding the differentiation between FNH and HA, adenoma typically appears hypointense in hepatobiliary phase, whereas FNH is isointense or hyperintense to the surrounding hepatic parenchyma. As for the identification of early HCCs, many papers recently published in literature have emphasized the contribution of hepatobiliary phase in the characterization of nodules without a typical hallmark of HCC. Atypical nodules (no hypervascularizaton observed on arterial phase and/or no hypovascular appearance on portal phase) with low signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase, have a high probability of malignancy. Finally, regarding the evaluation of focal hepatic metastases, magnetic resonance pre-operative assessment using gadoxetic acid allows for more accurate diagnosis.

Inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas can mimic focal nodular hyperplasia on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a recently categorized entity of hepatocellular neoplasms. We investigated whether gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can distinguish inflammatory HCA from focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1, 2009, through January 1, 2013, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI examinations from two institutions were reviewed for HCA, with specific histologic features of inflammatory HCA. Biopsy and resection slides were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry for glutamine synthetase was performed in a subset to confirm the initial diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 possible cases of inflammatory HCA were identified in the pathology database. On the basis of glutamine synthetase staining performed for this study, three cases were rediagnosed as FNH and thus were excluded from the study. Therefore, a total of seven patients with inflammatory HCA were identified. On gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, four of these patients had classic features of FNH (group A, FNH mimics), and three had imaging features suggestive of HCA (group B, typical inflammatory HCA). Imaging features that were considered diagnostic of FNH included isointense or minimal T2 hyperintensity, arterial enhancement, and diffuse hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase. Three of the four patients with FNH mimics had slides available for pathologic rereview, and the diagnosis of inflammatory HCA was supported by glutamine synthetase immunohistochemistry findings. The pathology reports of the remaining four cases were rereviewed and were also found to have features consistent with inflammatory HCA.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory HCA can mimic FNH on MRI, including hepatobiliary phase hyperintensity. Moreover, conventional pathology using histopathology alone may lead to misclassification of inflammatory HCA.

An increased flip angle in late phase Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI shows improved performance in bile duct visualization compared to T2w-MRCP

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the additional value of an increased flip angle of 35° in late phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography, as compared to T2w-MRCP.

METHODS

40 adult patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of the liver including a T2-weighted 3D TSE MRCP (T2w-MRCP) as well as a late phase T1-weighted THRIVE sequences applying a flip angle of 35° (fa35). Two experienced observers evaluated the images regarding the delineation of the different biliary regions using a three-point grading system. A five-point scale was applied to determine the readers' confidence in identifying anatomical variations of the biliary tree. ROI analysis was performed to compare the signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios.

RESULTS

The quality for visualizing the biliary tree differed between T2w-MRCP and fa35 (p=<0.001). Late phase EOB-MRC was rated as good for delineating the entire biliary system, whereas T2w-MRCP received an overall poor rating. Especially the depiction of the intrahepatic bile ducts was estimated as problematic in T2w-MRCP. T2w-MRCP and fa35 revealed a discordant assessment of anatomical variations in 12.5% of the cases, comprising a generally higher confidence level for fa35 (4.0 ± 1.1 vs. 2.2 ± 1.2, p=<0.001). SNR proofed to be significantly higher in fa35 (p=<0.001), whereas T2w-MRCP revealed a significantly higher CNR (<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography acquired with a flip angle of 35° revealed a better diagnostic performance compared to T2w-MRCP and might be a valuable adjunct in assessing functional bile duct abnormalities.

P4 radiology of hepatobiliary diseases with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI as a biomarker

A recent paradigm shift in radiology has focused on the globalization of so-called P4 radiology. P4 radiology represents delivery of imaging results that are predictive, personalized, pre-emptive and participatory. The combination of the P4 approach and biomarkers is particularly pertinent to MRI, especially with technological advances such as diffusion-weighted imaging. The development of new liver-specific MRI contrast media, particularly gadoxetic acid, demonstrate specific pharmacokinetic properties, which provide combined morphologic and functional information in the same setting. The evaluation of hepatobiliary pathology beyond morphology gives rise to the possibilty of using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI as an imaging biomarker of hepatobiliary diseases. The integration of functional imaging with an understanding of complex disease mechanisms forms the basis for P4 radiology, which may ultimately lead to individualized, cost-effective, targeted therapy for patients. This will enable radiologists to determine the prognosis of the disease and estimate early response to treatment, with the participation of all the required medical disciplines.

Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging

Liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents are increasingly used in evaluation of the liver. They are effective in detection and morphological characterization of lesions, and can be useful for evaluation of biliary tree anatomy and liver function. The typical appearances and imaging pitfalls of various tumours at MR imaging performed with these agents can be understood by the interplay of pharmacokinetics of these contrast agents and transporter expression of the tumour. This review focuses on the applications of these agents in oncological imaging.

Hepatic adenoma mimicking a metastatic lesion on computed tomography-positron emission tomography scan

Positron emission tomography (PET) using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) is an imaging modality which reflects cellular glucose metabolism. Most malignant cells accumulate and trap ¹⁸F-FDG, allowing the visualisation of increased uptake. It is hence widely used to differentiate malignant from benign lesions. “False positive” findings of hepatic lesions have been described in certain instances such as hepatic abscesses, but are rare in cases involving hepatocellular adenomas. To our knowledge, there have been only 7 reports in the English literature documenting PET-avid hepatocellular adenomas; 6 of the 7 reports were published in the last 3 years with the first report by Patel et al. We report the case of a 44-year-old Chinese female patient with a history of cervical adenocarcinoma, referred for a hepatic lesion noted on a surveillance computed tomography (CT) scan. A subsequent CT-PET performed showed a hypermetabolic lesion (standardized uptake value 7.9) in segment IVb of the liver. After discussion at a multi-disciplinary hepato-pancreato-biliary conference, the consensus was that of a metastatic lesion from her previous cervical adenocarcinoma, and a resection of the hepatic lesion was performed. Histology revealed features consistent with a hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 α inactivated steatotic hepatocellular adenoma.

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma around the World Viewed through the Scope of the Immunopathological Classification

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are benign hepatocellular tumors. The risk of bleeding and malignant transformation of HCA are strong arguments to differentiate HCA from FNH. Despite great progress that has been made in the differential radiological diagnosis of the 2 types of nodules, liver biopsy is sometimes necessary to separate the 2 entities. Identification of HCA subtypes using immunohistochemical techniques, namely, HNF1A-inactivated HCA (35-40%), inflammatory HCA (IHCA), and beta-catenin-mutated inflammatory HCA (b-IHCA) (50-55%), beta-catenin-activated HCA (5-10%), and unclassified HCA (10%) has greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy of benign hepatocellular nodules. If HCA malignant transformation occurs in all HCA subgroups, the risk is by far the highest in the β -catenin-mutated subgroups (b-HCA, b-IHCA). In the coming decade the management of HCA will be more dependent on the identification of HCA subtypes, particularly for smaller nodules (<5 cm) in terms of imaging, follow-up, and resection.

MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Adenomas and Differential Diagnosis Dilemma

HEPATOCELLULAR ADENOMAS (HCAS) ARE CURRENTLY CATEGORIZED INTO DISTINCT GENETIC AND PATHOLOGIC SUBTYPES AS FOLLOWS: inflammatory hepatocellular adenoma, hepatocyte-nuclear-factor-1-alpha (HNF-1 α -mutated) hepatocellular adenoma, and β -catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas; the fourth, defined as unclassified subtype, encompasses HCAs without any genetic abnormalities. This classification has accepted management implications due to different risks of haemorrhage and malignant transformation of the four subtypes. Imaging guided biopsy and/or surgical resection very important in obtaining definitive characterization; nevertheless, MRI with intra-extravascular and hepatobiliary (dual phase) agents, is an important tool not only in differential subtypes definition but even in surveillance with early identification of complications and discovery of some signs of HCA malignant degeneration. Inflammation, abnormal rich vascularisation, peliotic areas, and abundant fatty infiltration are pathologic findings differently present in the HCA subtypes and they may be detected by multiparametric MRI approach. Lesion enlargement and heterogeneity of signal intensity and of contrast enhancement are signs to be considered in malignant transformation. The purpose of this paper is to present the state of the art of MRI in the diagnosis of HCA and subtype characterization, with particular regard to morphologic and functional information available with dual phase contrast agents, and to discuss differential diagnosis with the most common benign and malignant lesions mimicking HCAs.

Flip angle modulations in late phase Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI improve the identification of the biliary system

OBJECTIVES

To assess the improvement of bile duct visualization in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR-cholangiography (EOB-MRC) by using an increased flip angle.

METHODS

35 patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of the liver including T2-weighted MRCP and hepatobiliary phase EOB-MRC using a flip angle of 10° (FA10) and of 35° (FA35), respectively. Images were evaluated regarding the delineation of biliary ducts, the order of branching and anatomic visualization of the biliary tree. ROI analysis was performed to estimate the signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios.

RESULTS

Applying the FA35 resulted in a significantly better SNR and CNR as compared to FA10. The overall image quality was rated as good for both, FA10 and FA35. The overall rating for regional delineation of the biliary system was rated significantly better for FA35 than for FA10 (p=0.02). Classification of bile duct anatomy variations, however, was equivalent in both techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the flip angle of a T1-weighted 3D-sequence from 10° to 35° during the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB enhanced MRI visually and quantitatively improved the visualization of the biliary ducts.