Detection of incidental vertebral fractures in breast imaging: the potential role of MR localisers

Readability of extraspinal organs on scout images of lumbar spine MRI according to different protocols

Background

Scout images of lumbar spine MRI often include the extraspinal organs, which are barely included in routine MRI and can be a potential cause of lumbar pain.

Purpose

To evaluate the readability of scout images for extraspinal organs in lumbar spine MRI according to different protocols.

Materials and methods

A total of 150 patients who underwent 1.5 T or 3 T lumbar spine MRI from March to September 2015 at three hospitals with different scout image protocols, were selected. Two radiologists independently reviewed the scout images to investigate whether exclusive diagnosis of major diseases involving the femoral head, femoral neck, sacroiliac joint, and kidneys was possible. Readability levels were divided into four categories: definitely, possibly, limited, and non-evaluable. The readability of scout images according to the protocols was compared using Chi-square test. Interobserver agreement for the readability level of scout images was assessed using weighted κ statistics.

Results

Of 150 patients, “definitely evaluable” cases classified by two readers were 50–62 (33.3–41.3%) for femoral head (κ = 0.63–0.71), 37–66 (24.7–44.0%) for femoral neck (κ = 0.41–0.48), 72–93 (48.0–62.0%) for sacroiliac joint (κ = 0.35–0.37), and 63–73 (42.0–48.7%) for kidneys (κ = 0.45–0.47). More than 50% of femoral heads were classified as readable (definitely or possible evaluable) cases by two readers with excellent interobserver agreement. The readability level of scout images was significantly different according to image protocols including the MRI sequence, number of coronal plane slices, and intersection gap of coronal plane slices (p≤0.015).

Conclusion

Scout images of lumbar spine MRI may be readable enough to rule out some major diseases of extraspinal organs. Standardization of the protocol will be needed to validate the potential role of scout images for screening extraspinal organs.

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures are Common in Hip Fracture Patients and are Under-recognized

INTRODUCTION

The vertebrae are the most common site for osteoporotic fracture. While they can result in disability and increased mortality, only one-third present clinically. People with multiple fractures are at greater risk of future fractures. Most hip fracture patients are neither diagnosed nor treated for their underlying osteoporosis. Computed tomography (CT) studies are often performed on hospitalised patients, can be used to diagnose osteoporosis and are gaining popularity for opportunistic osteoporosis screening by measuring BMD and other bone strength indices. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures on CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) in a cohort of hip fracture patients and whether this increased their diagnosis and treatment rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all hip fractures admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2017 to identify those who underwent CTPA scans. An independent, blinded consultant musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the images for vertebral fractures and quantified severity using Genant criteria. Results were compared to the original radiology report, discharge diagnoses and treatment rates for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Eleven percent (225/2122) of patients had CTPA images available. Seventy percent (158) were female with a mean age of 78 years (SD: 11). The median length of stay for all patients was 16 days (1-301). Forty percent (90) of patients had at least one vertebral fracture present and 20% (46) had more than one fracture. Only one in 5 radiology reports noted the fractures. 24% of subjects had osteoporosis treatment recorded at hospital discharge and there was no difference between those with vertebral fractures to those without.

CONCLUSION

Many hip fracture patients have undiagnosed spine fractures. A screening strategy which evaluates CT scans for fractures has potential to increase diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis. However, more work is needed to increase awareness.

Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on standard imaging performed for alternative indications

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Patients with VF are at increased risk of hip fractures or additional VFs, both of which contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of VFs is essential so patients can be prescribed appropriate medical therapy.

Most patients with clinical suspicion for VF have an X-ray of the spine. Many VFs are invisible on X-ray and require further imaging. CT can provide excellent bony detail but uses high doses of ionising radiation. MRI provides excellent soft tissue detail and can distinguish old from new fractures in addition to differentiating osteoporotic VFs from other causes of back pain. Bone scans have a limited role due to poor specificity.

The literature suggests that radiologists frequently miss or do not report VFs when imaging is requested for an alternative clinical indication and when there is no clinical suspicion of VF. Common examples include failure to identify VFs on lateral chest X-rays, sagittal reformats of CT thorax and abdomen, lateral localizers on MRI and scout views on CT.

Failure to diagnose a VF is a missed opportunity to improve management of osteoporosis and reduce risk of further fractures. This article discusses the role of radiographs, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy in the assessment and recognition of osteoporotic fractures. This article focuses on opportunistic diagnosis of VFs on imaging studies that are performed for other clinical indications. It does not discuss use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry which is a specific imaging modality for osteoporosis.

Whole spine localizers of magnetic resonance imaging detect unexpected vertebral fractures

BACKGROUND

Whole spine localizers (WS-loc) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are performed for enumeration of the vertebrae but they can be also used for the evaluation of the spine.

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of fracture detection using WS-locs of MRI and compare the findings with standard high-resolution short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, and to determine whether the review of WS-locs is useful and if additional information can be gained by assessing the thoracic spine section of the WS-locs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 298 magnetic resonance (MR) examinations of the lumbar spine with WS-locs were evaluated. Two independent readers reviewed the images. In case of fracture detection, further characterization of the fracture was performed. To assess inter-reader agreement, unweighted Cohen's kappa with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and Phi coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

The study sample included 187 female and 111 male patients (age range = 65-94 years; median age = 75.0 years). The WS-locs detected 42 fractures of the lumbar spine and 36 of the thoracic spine. Inter-reader agreement for fracture detection in the lumbar and thoracic spine was strong (K = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.95, Phi = 0.87, and K = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.96, Phi = 0.88, respectively).

CONCLUSION

WS-locs from MR examinations of the lumbar spine provide a good diagnostic tool for the detection and evaluation of unsuspected vertebral fractures. WS-locs show strong inter-reader agreement for fracture detection in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current evidence regarding the vertebral fracture prevalence, the accuracy of vertebral fracture identification on current imaging technologies, and the potential impact of vertebral fracture identification on fracture risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Important new studies have clarified the features of prevalent vertebral fracture that most strongly predict incident fractures. Age- and sex-stratified estimates of vertebral fracture prevalence on densitometric lateral spine images in the US population are now available. The accuracy of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment, how computed tomography scans and other spinal images obtained for indications other than vertebral fracture assessment can be leveraged to detect prevalent vertebral fractures, and the potential impact of vertebral fracture assessment on patient and provider fracture risk management behavior have been clarified. Substantial progress has been made regarding screening strategies using lateral spine imaging to detect prevalent vertebral fracture in the older population. Further research regarding implementation of these strategies in clinical practice and their impact on clinical outcomes is needed.

Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia

Bone and muscle are two deeply interconnected organs and a strong relationship between them exists in their development and maintenance. The peak of both bone and muscle mass is achieved in early adulthood, followed by a progressive decline after the age of 40. The increase in life expectancy in developed countries resulted in an increase of degenerative diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and are associated with a significant increase in healthcare costs. Several imaging techniques are currently available for the non-invasive investigation of bone and muscle mass and quality. Conventional radiology, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound often play a complementary role in the study of osteoporosis and sarcopenia, depicting different aspects of the same pathology. This paper presents the different imaging modalities currently used for the investigation of bone and muscle mass and quality in osteoporosis and sarcopenia with special emphasis on the clinical applications and limitations of each technique and with the intent to provide interesting insights into recent advances in the field of conventional imaging, novel high-resolution techniques and fracture risk.

Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures?

Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures are at increased risk of hip fracture. In a cohort of hip fracture patients, many had previous imaging studies showing incidental vertebral fractures. Fifty-four percent of fractures were not reported by the radiologist, highlighting a missed opportunity for diagnosing and treating osteoporosis, thereby preventing further fractures.

PURPOSE

Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) are at increased risk of future fractures, including hip fractures. Treating osteoporosis in these patients has the potential to reduce the risk of subsequent hip fractures, which are associated with high morbidity, mortality and cost. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the reporting and follow-up of VFFs evident on imaging by radiologists at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the local Fracture Liaison Service was used to case-find all incident hip fractures from 2013 presenting to the trust. We then identified patients who had also undergone a radiological procedure that included the thoracic and/or lumbar spine in the previous 6 years. All identified radiological images were re-examined for the presence of VFFs using the Genant semi-quantitative method.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-two patients over the age of 50 with a hip fracture in 2013 were identified. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had previously undergone a radiological procedure involving the spine, and VFFs were identified in 65/157 (41%). Of these, only 30/65 (46%) were reported by a radiologist when the fracture was first visible. 32/35 (91%) of unreported VFFs were from imaging reported by non-musculoskeletal radiologists. Only 16/65 (25%) of patients with a VFF were documented as being on bone-specific therapy at the time of hip fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the under-reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, particularly by non-musculoskeletal radiologists. Better systems for reporting and referring osteoporotic VFFs are necessary to increase the number of patients receiving appropriate osteoporosis treatment.

Breast findings incidentally detected on body MRI

Objectives

To evaluate breast findings incidentally detected on body MRI.

Methods

A retrospective review of the institutional database identified 1752 body MRI performed between January 2015 and September 2015. MRI of women with breast tissue visible in the field-of-view were reviewed for breast findings. Breast findings were classified with the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon. The standard statistic, costs of additional work-up, and the clinical relevance were used to describe breast findings, and we calculated 95 % exact confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

440 body MRI of 440 women (mean age: 57 ± 20 years) included breast tissue in the field-of-view. A total of 41 breast findings were identified in 41 patients. Breast findings were classified BI-RADS 2 N = 25, BI-RADS 3 N = 13, BI-RADS 4 N = 3. A total of 3.6 % [95 % CI 1.6 %, 5.6 %] women with breast tissue visible on MRI had a recommendation for further imaging work-up for a breast finding. The 18.7 % (3 of 16) of these patients had a clinically important finding (breast cancer). Further imaging evaluation increased costs of €108.3 per patient with a breast finding.

Conclusions

Clinically important breast findings could be detected on body MRI in up to 0.7 % (3 of 440) of women.

Opportunistic Identification of Vertebral Fractures

Vertebral fractures are powerful predictors of future fracture, so, their identification is important to ensure that patients are commenced on appropriate bone protective or bone-enhancing therapy. Risk factors (e.g., low bone mineral density and increasing age) and symptoms (back pain, loss of height) may herald the presence of vertebral fractures, which are usually confirmed by performing spinal radiographs or, increasingly, using vertebral fracture assessment with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners. However, a large number (30% or more) of vertebral fractures are asymptomatic and do not come to clinical attention. There is, therefore, scope for opportunistic (fortuitous) identification of vertebral fractures from various imaging modalities (radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radionuclide scans) performed for other clinical indications and which include the spine in the field of view, with midline sagittal reformatted images from computed tomography having the greatest potential for such opportunistic detection. Numerous studies confirm this potential for identification but consistently find underreporting of vertebral fractures. So, a valuable opportunity to improve the management of patients at increased risk of future fracture is being squandered. Educational training programs for all clinicians and constant reiteration, stressing the importance of the accurate and clear reporting of vertebral fractures ("you only see what you look for"), can improve the situation, and automated computer-aided diagnostic tools also show promise to solve the problem of this underreporting of vertebral fractures.

Localizer sequences of magnetic resonance imaging accurately identify osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of sagittal MR localizer (MR-loc), in terms of diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-observer agreement in the detection of vertebral fractures (VFs). Three-hundred MR examinations of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were randomly collected. A semi-quantitative approach was used and morphometric analysis was performed when a VF was suspected. MR-loc images were evaluated blindly by three radiologists in two different sessions. A full diagnostic sagittal T1-weighted fast spin echo MR sequence was used as standard of reference (RS). Degenerative arthritis was also scored on RS. Only vertebral bodies which were assessable by both MR-loc and RS were considered for the analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Cohen kappa statistic, and linear-by-linear association were used for statistical analysis. Kappa values were compared by means of the z distribution. A total of 2186 vertebrae were analysed in 300 MRI exams (147 males, 153 females, 59.4±16.4y.o.). Sixty-seven out of 2136 (3.1%) VFs were identified in 23/300 (7.7%) patients submitted to MRI. In the detection of VFs, sensitivity and specificity of MR-loc were both 100% (accuracy AUROC=1.000). Inter-observer agreement was excellent (k=0.938±0.013), while intra-observer agreement was perfect (k=1.000). The diagnostic performance was independent from degenerative arthritis, vertebral level, type and grade of VFs. MR-loc is a simple but accurate tool in the detection of VFs. It should be introduced for systematic evaluation in the detection of VFs in MR examinations performed in daily clinical practice.

Reliability and accuracy of scout CT in the detection of vertebral fractures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of scout CT (sCT) lateral radiograph, in terms of diagnostic accuracy and intra- and interobserver agreement in the detection of vertebral fractures (VFs).

METHODS

300 CT examinations of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were collected and independently analysed by 3 musculoskeletal radiologists in 2 different sessions. A semi-quantitative approach was used for VF assessment on sCT, and morphometric analysis was performed when a VF was suspected. Results of multiplanar sagittal CT reconstructions interpreted by the most expert radiologist were considered as gold standard. Arthrosis was also scored. Only vertebral bodies assessable by both sCT and gold standard were considered for the analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Cohen's kappa statistic and linear-by-linear association were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

1522 vertebrae were considered (130 males and 170 females; ages, 73.0±2.8 years). 73 of 1522 (4.8%) VFs were identified in 34/300 patients (11.3%). In the detection of VFs, the sensitivity and specificity of sCT were 98.7% and 99.7%, respectively. Accuracy (AUROC=0.992±0.008), as well as interobserver agreement (k=0.968±0.008), was excellent. Intra-observer agreement was perfect (k=1.000). Performance of this method was independent of arthrosis, vertebral level and type and grade of VFs.

CONCLUSION

sCT is a simple but very accurate method for the detection of VFs. It should be introduced as a spine evaluation tool for the detection of VFs in examinations that are performed for other diagnostic purposes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

sCT lateral radiograph is an accurate tool for the detection of VFs. This technique may be used with several advantages in clinical practice.

Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services

Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been demonstrated in many countries to provide an effective means to deliver secondary preventive care for patients presenting with fragility fractures. This review provides an update on journal articles, reports, guidelines and government policies, with relevance to FLS, which have been published during the period 2009-2012. International evidence of the extent and persistence of the secondary fracture prevention care gap has expanded during this period. Major professional and patient societies throughout the world, including the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, have supported international initiatives to disseminate best practice. Health economic analysis of FLS has developed considerably, with a consistent theme from investigator-led and government analyses that FLS provide highly cost-effective care. Opportunities to close the care gap, in a systematic way, for unrecognised vertebral fracture sufferers are also considered.