Metal artefact suppression at 3 T MRI: comparison of MAVRIC-SL with conventional fast spin echo sequences in patients with Hip joint arthroplasty

The role of advanced metal artifact reduction MRI in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Identification and diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are challenging, requiring a multi-disciplinary approach involving clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. MRI is advantageous to alternative imaging techniques due to superior soft tissue contrast and absence of ionizing radiation. However, the presence of metallic implants can cause signal loss and artifacts. Metal artifact suppression (MARS) MRI techniques have been developed that mitigate metal artifacts and improve periprosthetic soft tissue visualization. This paper provides a review of the various MARS MRI techniques, their clinical applicability and accuracy in PJI diagnosis and evaluation, and current challenges and future perspectives.

Quantitative evaluation of the reduction of distortion and metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance images using the multiacquisition variable‑resonance image combination selective sequence

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to computed tomography (CT) in determining changes in tissue structure, such as those observed following inflammation and infection. However, when metal implants or other metal objects are present, MRI exhibits more distortion and artifacts compared with CT, which hinders the accurate measurement of the implants. A limited number of reports have examined whether the novel MRI sequence, multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective (MAVRIC SL), can accurately measure metal implants without distortion. Therefore, the present study aimed to demonstrate whether MAVRIC SL could accurately measure metal implants without distortion and whether the area around the metal implants could be well delineated without artifacts. An agar phantom containing a titanium alloy lumbar implant was used for the present study and was imaged using a 3.0 T MRI machine. A total of three imaging sequences, namely MAVRIC SL, CUBE and magnetic image compilation (MAGiC), were applied and the results were compared. Distortion was evaluated by measuring the screw diameter and distance between the screws multiple times in the phase and frequency directions by two different investigators. The artifact region around the implant was examined using a quantitative method following standardization of the phantom signal values. It was revealed that MAVRIC SL was a superior sequence compared with CUBE and MAGiC, as there was significantly less distortion, a lack of bias between the two different investigators and significantly reduced artifact regions. These results suggested the possibility of utilizing MAVRIC SL for follow-up to observe metal implant insertions.

Multiacquisition with variable resonance image combination T2 (MAVRIC SL T2) for postoperative cervical spine with artificial disc replacement

Anterior cervical discectomy with artificial disc replacement (ADR) is an effective treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. However, postoperative MRI due to recurrent neck/radicular pain is limited due to severe metallic artifacts of artificial disc instrument. Multiacquisition with variable resonance image combination selective T2 (MAVRIC SL T2) has been developed as an MRI technique for metal artifact reduction but has not been evaluated for the postoperative cervical spine with ADR. In our study, we compared MAVRIC SL T2 with the fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted sequence (T2WI), which was an essential MR sequence for evaluation of the cervical neural structure, for metallic artifact reduction in the post-operative cervical spine with ADR. Our study revealed MAVRIC SL T2 showed smaller signal void areas, less distortion and signal pile-up, and was more clinically useful than T2WI (p < 0.05). The spinal cord, vertebral bodies, both neural foramina, and anterior paravertebral soft tissue were significantly more visible with MAVRIC SL T2 than with T2WI (p < 0.05). MAVRIC SL T2 might be a useful technique for the evaluation of postoperative cervical spine with ADR and complements T2WI in the evaluation of the spinal cord and nerve roots which were important structures for post-operative recurrent neck/radicular pain.

State-of-the-Art Imaging Techniques in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) is a debilitating complication in oncology patients. This narrative review discusses the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities in diagnosing MSCC, the role of imaging in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for MSCC treatment, and recent advances in deep learning (DL) tools for MSCC diagnosis. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using targeted keywords. Studies were reviewed in consensus among the co-authors for their suitability before inclusion. MRI is the gold standard of imaging to diagnose MSCC with reported sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 97% respectively. CT Myelogram appears to have comparable sensitivity and specificity to contrast-enhanced MRI. Conventional CT has a lower diagnostic accuracy than MRI in MSCC diagnosis, but is helpful in emergent situations with limited access to MRI. Metal artifact reduction techniques for MRI and CT are continually being researched for patients with spinal implants. Imaging is crucial for SBRT treatment planning and three-dimensional positional verification of the treatment isocentre prior to SBRT delivery. Structural and functional MRI may be helpful in post-treatment surveillance. DL tools may improve detection of vertebral metastasis and reduce time to MSCC diagnosis. This enables earlier institution of definitive therapy for better outcomes.

Development and evaluation of a numerical simulation approach to predict metal artifacts from passive implants in MRI

OBJECTIVE

This study presents the development and evaluation of a numerical approach to simulate artifacts of metallic implants in an MR environment that can be applied to improve the testing procedure for MR image artifacts in medical implants according to ASTM F2119.

METHODS

The numerical approach is validated by comparing simulations and measurements of two metallic test objects made of titanium and stainless steel at three different field strengths (1.5T, 3T and 7T). The difference in artifact size and shape between the simulated and measured artifacts were evaluated. A trend analysis of the artifact sizes in relation to the field strength was performed.

RESULTS

The numerical simulation approach shows high similarity (between 75% and 84%) of simulated and measured artifact sizes of metallic implants. Simulated and measured artifact sizes in relation to the field strength resulted in a calculation guideline to determine and predict the artifact size at one field strength (e.g., 3T or 7T) based on a measurement that was obtained at another field strength only (e.g. 1.5T).

CONCLUSION

This work presents a novel tool to improve the MR image artifact testing procedure of passive medical implants. With the help of this tool detailed artifact investigations can be performed, which would otherwise only be possible with substantial measurement effort on different MRI systems and field strengths.

The Utility of MRI With Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination (MAVRIC) in Diagnosing Deep Total Hip Arthroplasty Infection

Background: The 2010 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines report insufficient evidence to address the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Questions/Purposes: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of MRI with multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC) metal artifact suppression techniques in diagnosing PJI in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination MRIs obtained of THAs between November 2012 and November 2016 were queried. Radiology reports were classified as positive (suspicious for infection), negative (no features of infection), or inconclusive (infection cannot be excluded or correlation with aspiration suggested if clinically concerned). Chart review identified cases of deep PJI according to the modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Results: Of 2156 MRIs of THAs included, MRI was concerning for infection in 1.8% (n = 39), inconclusive in 1.2% (n = 26), and negative in 97.0% (n = 2091). Deep PJI was identified in 53 (2.5%) patients, 30 of whom (56.6%) had conclusively positive finding on MRI (false-negative rate: 43.4%, sensitivity: 56.6%). Of 2103 aseptic THAs, only 9 (0.4%) MRIs were read as suspicious for infection (false-positive rate: 0.4%; specificity: 99.6%). Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging with MAVRIC is a highly specific test for PJI with a low false-positive rate. This indicates that when clinicians are provided with an MRI that unexpectedly suggests infection, a formal evaluation for infection is indicated. In patients with otherwise equivocal diagnostic findings, MRI may help confirm, but not refute, a diagnosis of PJI. Prospective study with more experienced image reviewers may further support the use of MRI in PJI.

Diagnostic Value of Advanced Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging around metal joint prostheses including multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective at 1.5 T (from April 2014 to August 2020) was retrospectively evaluated by 2 radiologists for detection of abnormal findings (joint effusion, capsular thickening, pericapsular edema, soft-tissue fluid collection, soft-tissue edema, bone marrow edema pattern around the implant [BME pattern], lymphadenopathy, and others) and overall image impression for PJI. Regarding the soft-tissue fluid collection, presence of communication to the joint or capsular-like structure was evaluated. Clinical assessments were recorded. Positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and odds ratios (ORs) for PJI were calculated for the abnormal findings. Overall image impression for PJI was evaluated. χ2, Fisher exact, t, and Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used. Interobserver agreement was assessed with κ statistics.

RESULTS

Forty-three joints in 36 patients (mean ± SD age, 75.4 ± 8.8 years; 30 women; hip [n = 29], knee [n = 12], and elbow [n = 2]) were evaluated. Eighteen joints (42%) were clinically diagnosed as PJI. The findings suggesting PJI were capsular thickening (PPV, 70%; NPV, 90%; OR, 20.6), soft-tissue fluid collection (PPV, 81%; NPV, 81%; OR, 19.1), soft-tissue edema (PPV, 67%; NPV, 89%; OR, 17), pericapsular edema (PPV, 76%; NPV, 81%; OR, 13.7), and joint effusion (PPV, 55%; NPV, 100%; OR, 12). Soft-tissue fluid collection without capsular-like structure (PPV, 83%; NPV, 74%; OR, 14.4) or with communication to the joint (PPV, 75%; NPV, 71%; OR, 7.3) suggested PJI. The combinations of joint effusion, capsular thickening, pericapsular edema, soft-tissue fluid collection, and soft-tissue edema highly suggested PJI. Regarding the BME pattern, the combination with soft-tissue edema raised the possibility of PJI (PPV, 73%; NPV, 69%; OR, 5.9). Regarding the interobserver agreements for each abnormal finding, κ values were 0.60 to 0.77. Regarding the overall image impression, weighted κ value was 0.97 and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.949 (95% confidence interval, 0.893-1.005) and 0.926 (95% confidence interval, 0.860-0.991) with no significant difference (P = 0.534).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggesting PJI were capsular thickening, soft-tissue fluid collection, soft-tissue edema, pericapsular edema, and joint effusion. The combinations of them highly suggested PJI. Regarding the BME pattern, the combination with soft-tissue edema raised the possibility of PJI.

Clinical utility of accelerated MAVRIC-SL with robust-PCA compared to conventional MAVRIC-SL in evaluation of total hip arthroplasties

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of a conventional metal artifact suppression sequence MAVRIC-SL (multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination selective) and a novel 2.6-fold faster sequence employing robust principal component analysis (RPCA), in the MR evaluation of hip implants at 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six total hip implants in 25 patients were scanned at 3 T using a conventional MAVRIC-SL proton density-weighted sequence and an RPCA MAVRIC-SL proton density-weighted sequence. Comparison was made of image quality, geometric distortion, visualization around acetabular and femoral components, and conspicuity of abnormal imaging findings using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a non-inferiority test. Abnormal findings were correlated with subsequent clinical management and intraoperative findings if the patient underwent subsequent surgery.

RESULTS

Mean scores for conventional MAVRIC-SL were better than RPCA MAVRIC-SL for all qualitative parameters (p < 0.05), although the probability of RPCA MAVRIC-SL being clinically useful was non-inferior to conventional MAVRIC-SL (within our accepted 10% difference, p < 0.05), except for visualization around the acetabular component. Abnormal imaging findings were seen in 25 hips, and either equally visible or visible but less conspicuous on RPCA MAVRIC-SL in 21 out of 25 cases. In 4 cases, a small joint effusion was queried on MAVRIC-SL but not RPCA MAVRIC-SL, but the presence or absence of a small effusion did not affect subsequent clinical management and patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

While the overall image quality is reduced, RPCA MAVRIC-SL allows for significantly reduced scan time and maintains almost equal diagnostic performance.

Metallic Artifact Reduction of Multiacquisition With Variable Resonance Image Combination Selective-Short Tau Inversion Recovery for Postoperative Cervical Spine With Artificial Disk Replacement: A Preliminary Study

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate multiacquisition with variable resonance image combination selective short tau inversion recovery (MAVRIC SL STIR) for metallic artifact reduction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of postoperative cervical spine with artificial disk replacement.

Methods

A porcine cervical spine with artificial disk replacement was subject to 3 T MRI with variable fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences. Five volunteers underwent MRI with MAVRIC SL STIR and STIR. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed for metallic artifact reduction.

Results

MAVRIC SL STIR showed the least signal void areas in the tissue phantom and volunteer study. In the tissue phantom study, MAVRIC SL STIR showed the best visualization of anatomic structure, least distortion, and signal pile-up. However, it ranked last for the homogeneity of fat suppression among sequences. In the volunteer study, MAVRIC SL STIR showed better visualization of anatomic structure and lesser distortion, but showed worse image quality of the spinal cord than STIR in the sagittal plane (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

MAVRIC SL STIR might be useful for visualization of anatomy by reduction of signal void areas and distortion in the operated site but should be used as a complement to STIR for evaluation of the spinal cord signal change.

Basic and Advanced Metal-Artifact Reduction Techniques at Ultra-High Field 7-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Phantom Study Investigating Feasibility and Efficacy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of basic (increased receive bandwidth) and advanced (view-angle tilting [VAT] and slice-encoding for metal artifact correction [SEMAC]) techniques for metal-artifact reduction in ultra-high field 7-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this experimental study, we performed 7-T MRI of titanium alloy phantom models composed of a spinal pedicle screw (phantom 1) and an intervertebral cage (phantom 2) centered in a rectangular LEGO frame, embedded in deionized-water-gadolinium (0.1 mmol/L) solution. The following turbo spin-echo sequences were acquired: (1) nonoptimized standard sequence; (2) optimized, that is, increased receive bandwidth sequence (oBW); (3) VAT; (4) combination of oBW and VAT (oBW-VAT); and (5) SEMAC. Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated images regarding peri-implant signal void and geometric distortion (a, angle measurement and b, presence of circular shape loss). Statistics included Friedman test and Cochran Q test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. P values <0.05 were considered to represent statistical significance.

RESULTS

All metal-artifact reduction techniques reduced peri-implant signal voids and diminished geometric distortions, with oBW-VAT and SEMAC being most efficient. Compared with nonoptimized sequences, oBW-VAT and SEMAC produced significantly smaller peri-implant signal voids (all P ≤ 0.008) and significantly smaller distortion angles (P ≤ 0.001). Only SEMAC could significantly reduce distortions of circular shapes in the peri-implant frame (P ≤ 0.006). Notably, increasing the number of slice-encoding steps in SEMAC sequences did not lead to a significantly better metal-artifact reduction (all P ≥ 0.257).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of basic and advanced methods for metal-artifact reduction at 7-T MRI is feasible and effective. Both a combination of increased receive bandwidth and VAT as well as SEMAC significantly reduce the peri-implant signal void and geometric distortion around metal implants.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Around Metal at 1.5 Tesla: Techniques From Basic to Advanced and Clinical Impact

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, metal artifact reduction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been an area of intensive research and substantial improvement. The demand for an excellent diagnostic MRI scan quality of tissues around metal implants is closely linked to the steadily increasing number of joint arthroplasty (especially knee and hip arthroplasties) and spinal stabilization procedures. Its unmatched soft tissue contrast and cross-sectional nature make MRI a valuable tool in early detection of frequently encountered postoperative complications, such as periprosthetic infection, material wear-induced synovitis, osteolysis, or damage of the soft tissues. However, metal-induced artifacts remain a constant challenge. Successful artifact reduction plays an important role in the diagnostic workup of patients with painful/dysfunctional arthroplasties and helps to improve patient outcome. The artifact severity depends both on the implant and the acquisition technique. The implant's material, in particular its magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity, its size, geometry, and orientation in the MRI magnet are critical. On the acquisition side, the magnetic field strength, the employed imaging pulse sequence, and several acquisition parameters can be optimized. As a rule of thumb, the choice of a 1.5-T over a 3.0-T magnet, a fast spin-echo sequence over a spin-echo or gradient-echo sequence, a high receive bandwidth, a small voxel size, and short tau inversion recovery-based fat suppression can mitigate the impact of metal artifacts on diagnostic image quality. However, successful imaging of large orthopedic implants (eg, arthroplasties) often requires further optimized artifact reduction methods, such as slice encoding for metal artifact correction or multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination. With these tools, MRI at 1.5 T is now widely considered the modality of choice for the clinical evaluation of patients with metal implants.

Metal artifacts of hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T: a closer look into the B1 effects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of circular polarization (CP) and elliptical polarization (EP) of the B₁ field on metal implant-induced artifacts of titanium (Ti) and cobalt-chromium (CoCr) hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T field strengths.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In vitro Ti and CoCr total hip arthroplasty implants were evaluated using high transmit and receive bandwidth turbo spin echo (HBW-TSE) and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) metal artifact reduction techniques. Each technique was implemented at 1.5-T, which only allows for CP of B₁ field as the system default, as well as 3.0-T, which permitted CP and EP. Manual segmentation quantified the size of the metal artifacts at the level of the acetabular cup, femoral neck, and femoral shaft.

RESULTS

In the acetabular cup and femoral neck, 1.5-T CP achieved smaller artifact sizes than 3.0-T CP (28-29% on HBW-TSE, p = 0.002-0.005; 17-34% on SEMAC, p = 0.019-0.102) and 3.0-T EP (25-28% on HBW-TSE, p = 0.010-0.011; 14-36% on SEMAC, p = 0.058-0.135) techniques. In the femoral stem region, 3.0-T EP achieved more efficient artifact suppression than 3.0-T CP (HBW-TSE 44-45%, p < 0.001-0.022; SEMAC 76-104%, p < 0.001-0.022) and 1.5-T CP (HBW-TSE 76-96%, p < 0.001-0.003; SEMAC 138-173%, p = 0.003-0.005) techniques.

CONCLUSION

Despite slightly superior metal reduction ability of the 1.5-T in the region of the acetabular cup and prosthesis neck, 3.0-T MRI of hip arthroplasty implants using elliptically polarized RF pulses may overall be more effective in reducing metal artifacts than the current standard 1.5-T MRI techniques, which by default implements circularly polarized RF pulses.

Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the artefacts of 12 fixed orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance images obtained using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners, and to evaluate different imaging sequences designed to suppress metal artefacts.

Materials and Methods

In vitro, study casts of 1 adult with normal occlusion were used. Twelve orthodontic appliances were attached to the study casts and scanned. Turbo spin echo (TSE), TSE with high readout bandwidth, and TSE with view angle tilting and slice encoding for metal artefact correction were used to suppress metal artefacts. Artefacts were measured. In vivo, 6 appliances were scanned: 1) conventional stainless-steel brackets; 2) nickel-free brackets; 3) titanium brackets; 4) a Herbst appliance; 5) a fixed retainer; and 6) a rapid maxillary expander. The maxilla, mandible, nasopharynx, tongue, temporomandibular joints, and cranial base/eye globes were assessed. Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 indicated no artefacts and minor, moderate, and major artefacts, respectively.

Results

In vitro, titanium brackets and the fixed retainer created minor artefacts. In vivo, titanium brackets caused minor artefacts. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel free brackets, the fixed retainer, and the rapid maxillary expander caused major artefacts in the maxilla and mandible. Conventional stainless-steel and nickel-free brackets caused major artefacts in the eye globe (3-T). TSE with high readout bandwidth reduced image artefacts in both scanners.

Conclusion

Titanium brackets, the Herbst appliance, and the fixed retainer caused minor artefacts in images of neurocranial structures (1.5-T and 3-T) when using TSE with high readout bandwidth.

Using SEMAC at 3 T MR to evaluate spinal metallic implants and peripheral soft tissue lesions

We aimed to assess the usefulness of slice-encoding metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for the evaluation of spinal metallic implants and peripheral soft tissue lesions at 3T magnetic resonance.Twenty-seven patients with spinal metal implants underwent both SEMAC and high bandwidth (HiBW) based sequences scanning for reduction artifacts. The area size and maximum longitude of artifacts, the peri-prosthetic soft tissue, and metal visualization were assessed by 2 independent doctors, as well as the lesions signs were reviewed by 2 senior readers. A paired 2-tailed t-test and McNemar test were used for statistical analysis.The size of artifacts on SEMAC images decreased by 37% and 24%, and the scores are higher than that on HiBW images. T1 weighted (T1W)-SEMAC acquired the highest score in metal prosthesis visualization, while short tau inversion recovery SEMAC showed more signs of lesions than clinical HiBW group.SEMAC effectively reduces the metal artifacts and is useful for assessing soft tissue lesions.

Advances in MRI around metal

The prevalence of orthopedic metal implants is continuously rising in the aging society. Particularly the number of joint replacements is increasing. Although satisfying long-term results are encountered, patients may suffer from complaints or complications during follow-up, and often undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Yet metal implants cause severe artifacts on MRI, resulting in signal-loss, signal-pileup, geometric distortion, and failure of fat suppression. In order to allow for adequate treatment decisions, metal artifact reduction sequences (MARS) are essential for proper radiological evaluation of postoperative findings in these patients. During recent years, developments of musculoskeletal imaging have addressed this particular technical challenge of postoperative MRI around metal. Besides implant material composition, configuration and location, selection of appropriate MRI hardware, sequences, and parameters influence artifact genesis and reduction. Application of dedicated metal artifact reduction techniques including high bandwidth optimization, view angle tilting (VAT), and the multispectral imaging techniques multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC) and slice-encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) may significantly reduce metal-induced artifacts, although at the expense of signal-to-noise ratio and/or acquisition time. Adding advanced image acquisition techniques such as parallel imaging, partial Fourier transformation, and advanced reconstruction techniques such as compressed sensing further improves MARS imaging in a clinically feasible scan time. This review focuses on current clinically applicable MARS techniques. Understanding of the main principles and techniques including their limitations allows a considerate application of these techniques in clinical practice. Essential orthopedic metal implants and postoperative MR findings around metal are presented and highlighted with clinical examples.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:972-991.

Imaging near orthopedic hardware

Over one million total joint replacement surgeries were performed in the US in 2013 alone, and this number is expected to more than double by 2030. Traditional imaging techniques for postoperative evaluation of implanted devices, such as radiography, computerized tomography, or ultrasound, utilize ionizing radiation, suffer from beam hardening artifact, or lack the inherent high contrast necessary to adequately evaluate soft tissues around the implants, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), due to its ability to generate multiplanar, high-contrast images without the use of ionizing radiation is ideal for evaluating periprosthetic soft tissues but has traditionally suffered from in-plane and through-plane data misregistration due to the magnetic susceptibility of implanted materials. A recent renaissance in the interest of imaging near arthroplasty and implanted orthopedic hardware has led to the development of new techniques that help to mitigate the effects of magnetic susceptibility. This article describes the challenges of performing imaging near implanted orthopedic hardware, how to generate clinically interpretable images when imaging near implanted devices, and how the images may be interpreted for clinical use. We will also describe current developments of utilizing MRI to evaluate implanted orthopedic hardware.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:24-39.

Metallic implant geometry and susceptibility estimation using multispectral B0 field maps

PURPOSE

To estimate the susceptibility and the geometry of metallic implants from multispectral imaging (MSI) information, to separate the metal implant region from the surrounding signal loss region.

THEORY AND METHODS

The susceptibility map of signal-void regions is estimated from MSI B₀ field maps using total variation (TV) regularized inversion. Voxels with susceptibility estimates above a predetermined threshold are identified as metal. The accuracy of the estimated susceptibility and implant geometry was evaluated in simulations, phantom, and in vivo experiments.

RESULTS

The proposed method provided more accurate susceptibility estimation compared with a previous method without TV regularization, in both simulations and phantom experiments. In the phantom experiment where the actual implant was 40% of the signal-void region, the mean estimated susceptibility was close to the susceptibility in literature, and the precision and recall of the estimated geometry was 85% and 93%. In vivo studies in subjects with hip implants also demonstrated that the proposed method can distinguish implants from surrounding low-signal tissues, such as cortical bone.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method can improve the delineation of metallic implant geometry by distinguishing metal voxels from artificial signal voids and low-signal tissues by estimating the susceptibility maps. Magn Reson Med 77:2402-2413, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Novel MR imaging method--MAVRIC--for metal artifact suppression after joint replacement in musculoskeletal tumor patients

Background

Standard imaging modality for the follow-up after prosthetic replacements for musculoskeletal tumor patients has been conventional radiography. This technique is effective in detecting subtle changes in bone adjacent to metal implants, but in many cases, radiographs do not lead to definitive diagnosis of postoperative adverse events such as acute infection, local recurrence of soft tissue tumor or soft tissue local recurrence of osseous sarcoma. Conventional MRI sequences have not been effective due to metal artifacts. In this study, we tried to elucidate the effectiveness of metal artifact suppression using novel sequence, multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC), after musculoskeletal tumor surgeries.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 5 cases of malignant bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients who were reconstructed with metal prosthesis after wide resection of tumors. Images obtained using MAVRIC and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) were compared side by side. The paired MAVRIC and STIR images were qualitatively compared independently by two specialists for 4 parameters: visualization of bone - implant interface, visualization of surrounding soft tissues, image blurring, and overall image quality. Quantitatively, paired images were reviewed to identify the slice where the metal artifact was maximal, and a region of interest encompassing the implant and surrounding artifact was drawn using Advantage Workstation (GE Healthcare, Japan).

Results

There were no local recurrences that were detected. By utilizing MAVRIC, visualization of the bone - implant interface and visualization of the surrounding soft tissue were significantly improved in MAVRIC compared to STIR. Although blurring was worse on the MAVRIC acquisitions, the overall image quality was still better on MAVRIC. Quantitatively, the area of metal artifact measured using MAVRIC was markedly less compared to STIR (61.4 cm² vs 135.9 cm²).

Conclusion

Despite the relatively small number of cases in the present study, our observation strongly suggests that MAVRIC is able to improve the quality of images by decreasing the artifact caused by endoprosthesis, frequently utilized in reconstruction of musculoskeletal tumor patients. Further installments of conventional imaging sequences with the addition of gadolinium - enhancement will enable increased accuracy in diagnosing local recurrences of sarcoma patients.

Metal artifact suppression at the hip: diagnostic performance at 3.0 T versus 1.5 Tesla

PURPOSE

This work aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of a metal artifact suppression sequence (MAVRIC-SL) for imaging of hip arthroplasties (HA) at 1.5 and 3 Tesla (T) field strength.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (10 females; aged 27-74) with HA were examined at 3.0 and 1.5 T within 3 weeks. The sequence protocol included 3D-MAVRIC-SL PD (coronal), 3D-MAVRIC-SL STIR (axial), FSE T1, FSE PD and STIR sequences. Anatomical structures and pathological findings were assessed independently by two radiologists. Artifact extent and technical quality (image quality, fat saturation and geometric distortion) were also evaluated. Findings at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

While image quality was better at 1.5 T, visualization of anatomic structures and clinical abnormalities was not significantly different using the two field strengths (p > 0.05). Fat suppression and amount of artifacts were significantly better at 1.5 T (p  < 0.01). Inter- and intra-reader agreement for different anatomic details, image quality and visualization of abnormalities ranged from k = 0.62 to k = 1.00.

CONCLUSION

MAVRIC-SL at 1.5 T had a comparable diagnostic performance when compared MAVRIC-SL at 3.0 T; however, the higher field strength was associated with larger artifacts, limited image quality and worse fat saturation.