1
|
Henriksen OM, del Mar Álvarez-Torres M, Figueiredo P, Hangel G, Keil VC, Nechifor RE, Riemer F, Schmainda KM, Warnert EAH, Wiegers EC, Booth TC. High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 1: Perfusion and Diffusion Techniques. Front Oncol 2022; 12:810263. [PMID: 35359414 PMCID: PMC8961422 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods Experts in advanced MRI techniques applied to high-grade glioma treatment response assessment convened through a European framework. Current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers in adult high-grade glioma is reviewed, and individual modalities of perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging are discussed (in Part 1 of two). In Part 2, we discuss modalities related to metabolism and/or chemical composition, appraise the clinic readiness of the individual modalities, and consider post-processing methodologies involving the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging) or machine learning (radiomics). Results High-grade glioma vasculature exhibits increased perfusion, blood volume, and permeability compared with normal brain tissue. Measures of cerebral blood volume derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI have consistently provided information about brain tumor growth and response to treatment; it is the most clinically validated advanced technique. Clinical studies have proven the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for distinguishing post-treatment related effects from recurrence, but the optimal acquisition protocol, mode of analysis, parameter of highest diagnostic value, and optimal cut-off points remain to be established. Arterial spin labeling techniques do not require the injection of a contrast agent, and repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow can be performed. The absence of potential gadolinium deposition effects allows widespread use in pediatric patients and those with impaired renal function. More data are necessary to establish clinical validity as monitoring biomarkers. Diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, diffusion tensor or kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and other microstructural modeling approaches also allow treatment response assessment; more robust data are required to validate these alone or when applied to post-processing methodologies. Conclusion Considerable progress has been made in the development of these monitoring biomarkers. Many techniques are in their infancy, whereas others have generated a larger body of evidence for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto M. Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Patricia Figueiredo
- Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Systems and Robotics-Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Gilbert Hangel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
- High-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vera C. Keil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ruben E. Nechifor
- International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Frank Riemer
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | - Evita C. Wiegers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Thomas C. Booth
-
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoff BA, Lemasson B, Chenevert TL, Luker GD, Tsien CI, Amouzandeh G, Johnson TD, Ross BD. Parametric Response Mapping of FLAIR MRI Provides an Early Indication of Progression Risk in Glioblastoma. Acad Radiol 2021; 28:1711-1720. [PMID: 32928633 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Glioblastoma image evaluation utilizes Magnetic Resonance Imaging contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted, and noncontrast T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) acquisitions. Disease progression assessment relies on changes in tumor diameter, which correlate poorly with survival. To improve treatment monitoring in glioblastoma, we investigated serial voxel-wise comparison of anatomically-aligned FLAIR signal as an early predictor of GBM progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed longitudinal normalized FLAIR images (rFLAIR) from 52 subjects using voxel-wise Parametric Response Mapping (PRM) to monitor volume fractions of increased (PRMrFLAIR+), decreased (PRMrFLAIR-), or unchanged (PRMrFLAIR0) rFLAIR intensity. We determined response by rFLAIR between pretreatment and 10 weeks posttreatment. Risk of disease progression in a subset of subjects (N = 26) with stable disease or partial response as defined by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria was assessed by PRMrFLAIR between weeks 10 and 20 and continuously until the PRMrFLAIR+ exceeded a defined threshold. RANO defined criteria were compared with PRM-derived outcomes for tumor progression detection. RESULTS Patient stratification for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was achieved at week 10 using RANO criteria (PFS: p <0.0001; OS: p <0.0001), relative change in FLAIR-hyperintense volume (PFS: p = 0.0011; OS: p <0.0001), and PRMrFLAIR+ (PFS: p <0.01; OS: p <0.001). PRMrFLAIR+ also stratified responding patients' progression between weeks 10 and 20 (PFS: p <0.05; OS: p = 0.01) while changes in FLAIR-volume measurements were not predictive. As a continuous evaluation, PRMrFLAIR+ exceeding 10% stratified patients for PFA after 5.6 months (p<0.0001), while RANO criteria did not stratify patients until 15.4 months (p <0.0001). CONCLUSION PRMrFLAIR may provide an early biomarker of disease progression in glioblastoma.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bobholz SA, Lowman AK, Barrington A, Brehler M, McGarry S, Cochran EJ, Connelly J, Mueller WM, Agarwal M, O'Neill D, Nencka AS, Banerjee A, LaViolette PS. Radiomic Features of Multiparametric MRI Present Stable Associations With Analogous Histological Features in Patients With Brain Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:160-169. [PMID: 32548292 PMCID: PMC7289245 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2019.00029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR)-derived radiomic features have shown substantial predictive utility in modeling different prognostic factors of glioblastoma and other brain cancers. However, the biological relationship underpinning these predictive models has been largely unstudied, and the generalizability of these models had been called into question. Here, we examine the localized relationship between MR-derived radiomic features and histology-derived “histomic” features using a data set of 16 patients with brain cancer. Tile-based radiomic features were collected on T1, post-contrast T1, FLAIR, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images acquired before patient death, with analogous histomic features collected for autopsy samples coregistered to the magnetic resonance imaging. Features were collected for each original image, as well as a 3D wavelet decomposition of each image, resulting in 837 features per MR and histology image. Correlative analyses were used to assess the degree of association between radiomic–histomic pairs for each magnetic resonance imaging. The influence of several confounds was also assessed using linear mixed-effect models for the normalized radiomic–histomic distance, testing for main effects of different acquisition field strengths. Results as a whole were largely heterogeneous, but several features showed substantial associations with their histomic analogs, particularly those derived from the FLAIR and postcontrast T1W images. These features with the strongest association typically presented as stable across field strengths as well. These data suggest that a subset of radiomic features can consistently capture texture information on underlying tissue histology.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ross BD, Chenevert TL, Meyer CR. Retrospective Registration in Molecular Imaging. Mol Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816386-3.00080-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
5
|
Thust SC, Heiland S, Falini A, Jäger HR, Waldman AD, Sundgren PC, Godi C, Katsaros VK, Ramos A, Bargallo N, Vernooij MW, Yousry T, Bendszus M, Smits M. Glioma imaging in Europe: A survey of 220 centres and recommendations for best clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2018. [PMID: 29536240 PMCID: PMC6028837 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5314-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives At a European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) Annual Meeting 2015 workshop, commonalities in practice, current controversies and technical hurdles in glioma MRI were discussed. We aimed to formulate guidance on MRI of glioma and determine its feasibility, by seeking information on glioma imaging practices from the European Neuroradiology community. Methods Invitations to a structured survey were emailed to ESNR members (n=1,662) and associates (n=6,400), European national radiologists’ societies and distributed via social media. Results Responses were received from 220 institutions (59% academic). Conventional imaging protocols generally include T2w, T2-FLAIR, DWI, and pre- and post-contrast T1w. Perfusion MRI is used widely (85.5%), while spectroscopy seems reserved for specific indications. Reasons for omitting advanced imaging modalities include lack of facility/software, time constraints and no requests. Early postoperative MRI is routinely carried out by 74% within 24–72 h, but only 17% report a percent measure of resection. For follow-up, most sites (60%) issue qualitative reports, while 27% report an assessment according to the RANO criteria. A minority of sites use a reporting template (23%). Conclusion Clinical best practice recommendations for glioma imaging assessment are proposed and the current role of advanced MRI modalities in routine use is addressed. Key Points • We recommend the EORTC-NBTS protocol as the clinical standard glioma protocol. • Perfusion MRI is recommended for diagnosis and follow-up of glioma. • Use of advanced imaging could be promoted with increased education activities. • Most response assessment is currently performed qualitatively. • Reporting templates are not widely used, and could facilitate standardisation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5314-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C Thust
- Lysholm Neuroradiology Department, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Department of Brain Rehabilitation and Repair, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Imaging Department, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Heiland
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Falini
- Department of Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - H R Jäger
- Lysholm Neuroradiology Department, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Department of Brain Rehabilitation and Repair, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Imaging Department, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - A D Waldman
- Neuroimaging Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - P C Sundgren
- Institution for Clinical Sciences/Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Centre for Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - C Godi
- Department of Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - V K Katsaros
- General Anti-Cancer and Oncological Hospital "Agios Savvas", Athens, Greece
- Central Clinic of Athens, Athens, Greece
- University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Ramos
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - N Bargallo
- Image Diagnostic Centre, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Magnetic Resonance Core Facility, Institut per la Recerca Biomedica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M W Vernooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Yousry
- Lysholm Neuroradiology Department, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - M Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Hoorn A, Yan JL, Larkin TJ, Boonzaier NR, Matys T, Price SJ. Posttreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Changes in the Periresectional Area in Patients with Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 2016; 92:159-165. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
7
|
Kim R, Choi SH, Yun TJ, Lee ST, Park CK, Kim TM, Kim JH, Park SW, Sohn CH, Park SH, Kim IH. Prognosis prediction of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity lesions in glioblastoma patients after standard treatment: application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 27:1176-1185. [PMID: 27357131 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4464-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2016] [Revised: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify candidate imaging biomarkers for early disease progression in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients by analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR parameters of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity (SI) lesions. METHODS Forty-nine GBM patients who had undergone preoperative DCE MR imaging and received standard treatment were retrospectively included. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, patients were classified into progression (n = 21) or non-progression (n = 28) groups. We analysed the pharmacokinetic parameters of Ktrans, Ve and Vp within non-enhancing T2 high SI lesions of each tumour. The best percentiles of each parameter from cumulative histograms were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and were compared using multivariate stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS For the differentiation of early disease progression, the highest AUC values were found in the 99th percentile of Ktrans (AUC 0.954), the 97th percentile of Ve (AUC 0.815) and the 94th percentile of Vp (AUC 0.786) (all p < 0.05). The 99th percentile of Ktrans was the only significant independent variable from the multivariate stepwise logistic regression (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS We found that the Ktrans of non-enhancing T2 high SI lesions in GBM patients holds potential as a candidate prognostic marker in future prospective studies. KEY POINTS • DCE MR imaging provides candidate prognostic marker of GBM after standard treatment. • Cumulative histogram was applied to include entire non-enhancing T2 high SI lesions. • The 99th percentile value of Ktrans was the most likely potential biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rihyeon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hong Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Republic of Korea. .,Center for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul National University, Daehak-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea. .,School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Daehak-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea.
| | - Tae Jin Yun
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon-Tae Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Kee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun-Won Park
- Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Ho Sohn
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hye Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Il Han Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|