Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT

Influence of tube and patient positioning in thoracoabdominal CT examinations on radiation exposure-towards a better patient positioning

Although iso-centric patient positioning is enormously important in computed tomography (CT), it is complicated in thoracoabdominal imaging by the varying dimensions of the body. Patient positioning can affect the appearance of the patient on the localiser. Positioned too close to the x-ray tube, a patient appears considerably more voluminous. The goal of this study is to assess the difference in radiation exposure of combined chest and abdomen CT scans between scans with prior 0°- and 180°-localisers in conjunction with patient positioning. In this IRB-approved retrospective study, patients who had two routine thoracoabdominal CT scans on the same CT scanner, one with a prior 0°- and one with a prior 180°-localiser, were included. To evaluate the radiation exposure of the thoracoabdominal CT examination regarding the tube position during the localiser, volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), patient diameter and positioning within the iso-centre for three positions (heart, abdomen, femur level) were compared with regard to the tube position during the prior localiser. CT examinations of 114 patients were included. Despite similar patient weight and diameter between the two examinations, SSDE and CTDIvolwas significantly larger (up to 73%) with 180°-localisers. Patient offset from the iso-centre ranged between -9 mm at the centre slice (abdomen level) to -43 mm at the most caudal slice at the pelvis (femur level), causing a significant magnification (p < 0.001) on 180°-localisers with a subsequent increase of the apparent attenuation. The results of this study emphasise the use of 0°-localisers in thoracoabdominal CTs, since 180°-localisers caused patient magnification with subsequent increase in radiation exposure. The advantage of 180°-localisers, namely reducing the dose in thyroid and breast, is eliminated if the dose of the CT scan increases significantly in the abdomen and pelvis.

Patient dose increase caused by posteroanterior CT localizer radiographs

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the output dose (volume CT dose index [ CTDI_vol], and dose length product [DLP]) of automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) determined by localizer radiographs obtained in the anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior (PA) directions.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four patients who underwent upper abdomen and/or chest-to-pelvis computed tomography (CT) were included. Patients underwent two series of CT examinations, and localizer radiographs were obtained in the AP and PA directions. The horizontal diameter of the localizer radiograph, scan length, CTDI_vol, and DLP were measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the scan length; however, all the other values were significantly higher in the PA direction. The mean horizontal diameter was 33.1 ± 2.6 cm and 35.4 ± 2.9 cm in the AP and PA directions of the localizer radiographs, respectively. The CTDI_vol and DLP in the PA direction increased by approximately 7-8%. Bland-Altman plots between AP and PA localizer directions in upper abdominal CT showed a positive bias of 1.1 mGy and 30.0 mGy cm for CTDI_vol and DLP, respectively. Correspondingly, chest-to-pelvic CT showed a positive bias of 0.93 mGy and 69.3 mGy cm for CTDI_vol and DLP, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The output dose of ATCM determined by localizer radiographs obtained in the PA direction was increased compared to the AP direction. Localizer radiographs obtained in the AP direction should be preferred for optimizing the output dose using ATCM.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Based on the evidence of this study, localizer radiographs obtained in the AP direction should be preferred for optimizing the output dose in CT examinations.

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different scanning methods used for computed tomography of the unilateral shoulder

BACKGROUND

The effect of different computed tomography (CT) scanning methods of the shoulder on image quality is uncertain.

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of different methods of CT scanning of the right shoulder on image quality and radiation dose.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 30 adults were divided into five groups. Group A received scans centered on the body's long axis, a scout direction of 0° + 90°, and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM). The other four groups (B, C, D, E) received isocenter scans centered on the shoulder with different scout directions (B and C: 0° + 90°, D: 0°, E: 0° + 270°) and tube currents (B: 420 mA; C, D, E: ATCM). The volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol), dose-length product (DLP), image objective noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Three subjective measures were also compared (noise, stripe artifacts, diagnostic confidence).

RESULTS

The five groups differed significantly in all subjective and objective indexes. The CTDI_vol and DLP decreased in the order of groups C, A, B, E, and D; the differences between groups A and B were not significant (P > 0.05). Groups B, C, and E had better SNR and CNR than groups A and D (P < 0.01). Subjective evaluations indicated group D was worse than groups B, C, and E (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the ATCM system that uses the last scout view, CT of the shoulder should use isocenter scanning with the lateral scout view when the tube is away from the long axis of the body as the last execution direction.

The influence of patient positioning on radiation dose in CT imaging: A narrative review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although it is fundamental for optimal scanner operation, it is generally accepted that accurate patient centring cannot always be achieved. This review aimed to examine the reported knowledge of the negative impact of patient positioning on radiation dose and image quality during CT imaging. Furthermore, the study evaluated the current optimisation tools and techniques used to improve patient positioning relative to the gantry iso-center.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search through the databases PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar was performed. Keywords included patient off-centring, patient positioning, localiser radiograph orientation, radiation dose, and automatic patient positioning (including synonyms). The search was limited to full-text articles that were written in English. After initial title and abstract screening, a total of 52 articles were identified to address the aim of the review. No limitations were imposed on the year of publication.

RESULTS

Vertical off-centring was reported in up to 95% of patients undergoing chest and abdominal CT examinations, showing a significant influence on radiation dose. Depending on the scanner model and vendor, localiser orientation, bowtie filter used, and patient size, radiation dose varied from a decrease of 36% to an increase of 91%. A significant dose reduction was demonstrated when utilising an AP localiser, aligning with the trend for radiographers to off-center patients below the gantry iso-centre. Utilizing a 3D camera for body contour detection allowed for more accurate patient positioning and promoted further dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

Patient positioning has shown significant effects on radiation dose and image quality in CT. Developing a good understanding of the key factors influencing patient dose (off-centring direction, localiser orientation, patient size and bowtie filter selection) is critical in optimising CT scanning practices. Utilising a 3D camera for body contour detection is strongly recommended to improve patient positioning accuracy, image quality and to minimise patient dose.

Metal implants influence CT scan parameters leading to increased local radiation exposure: A proposal for correction techniques

Metal implants not only deteriorate image quality, but also increase radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of metal hip prosthesis on absorbed radiation dose and assess the efficacy of organ dose modulation (ODM) and metal artifact reduction (MAR) protocols on dose reduction. An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with and without bilateral metal hip prostheses, and surface and deep level radiation doses were measured at the abdomen and pelvis. Finally, the absorbed radiation doses at pelvic and abdominal cavities in the reference, ODM, and two MAR scans (Gemstone spectral imaging, GE) were compared. The Mann Whitney-U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to compare the volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and mean absorbed radiation doses. Unilateral and bilateral metal hip prostheses increased CTDI_VOL by 14.4% and 30.5%, respectively. MAR protocols decreased absorbed radiation doses in the pelvis. MAR showed the most significant dose reduction in the deep pelvic cavity followed by ODM. However, MAR protocols increased absorbed radiation doses in the upper abdomen. ODM significantly reduced absorbed radiation in the pelvis and abdomen. In conclusion, metal hip implants increased radiation doses in abdominopelvic CT scans. MAR and ODM techniques reduced absorbed radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT scans with metal hip prostheses.

Radiation dose and image quality in intraoperative CT (iCT) angiography of the brain with stereotactic head frames

OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative CT (iCT) angiography of the brain with stereotactic frames is an integral part of navigated neurosurgery. Validated data regarding radiation dose and image quality in these special examinations are not available. We therefore investigated two iCT protocols in this IRB-approved study.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients, who received a cerebral stereotactic iCT angiography on a 128 slice CT scanner between February 2016 and December 2017. In group A, automated tube current modulation (ATCM; reference value 410 mAs) and automated tube voltage selection (reference value 120 kV) were enabled, and only examinations with a selected voltage of 120 kV were included. In group B, fixed parameters were applied (300 mAs, 120 kV). Radiation dose was measured by assessing the volumetric CT dose index (CTDI_vol), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image noise were assessed for objective image quality, visibility of arteries and grey-white differentiation for subjective image quality.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients (n = 100 in each group) were included. In group A, median selected tube current was 643 mAs (group B, 300 mAs; p < 0.001). Median values of CTDI_vol, DLP and ED were 91.54 mGy, 1561 mGy cm and 2.97 mSv in group A, and 43.15 mGy, 769 mGy cm and 1.46 mSv in group B (p < 0.001). Image quality did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ATCM yielded disproportionally high radiation dose due to substantial tube current increase at the frame level, while image quality did not improve. Thus, ATCM should preferentially be disabled.

KEY POINTS

• Automated tube current modulation (ATCM) yields disproportionally high radiation dose in intraoperative CT angiography of the brain with stereotactic head frames. • ATCM does not improve overall image quality in these special examinations. • ATCM is not yet optimised for CT angiography of the brain with major extracorporeal foreign materials within the scan range.

Effect of CT Localizer Radiographs on Radiation Dose Associated With Automatic Tube Current Modulation: A Multivendor Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the influence of the CT localizer radiograph on the automatic tube current modulation system of 7 CT scanners produced by 4 different CT manufacturers.

METHODS

The influence of the localizer orientation, table height, tube current and tube potential values on the radiation dose of the related CT scan were evaluated. Images were acquired by using an anthropomorphic phantom positioned in the CT gantry isocenter as well as from -6 cm to +6 cm vertically to the isocenter.

RESULTS

Vertical movement of the CT table height affected the radiation dose in all scanners using anterior-posterior or a posterior-anterior localizer orientation albeit differently, depending on the manufacturer; only in 1/7 scanner no influence was observed. The latero-lateral localizer orientation proved to be more effective in limiting the influence of the vertical miscentering in all scanners. Changing localizer's tube voltage influenced the scan radiation dose in scanners produced by two manufacturers, while no significant effect was observed in scanners produced by the other two manufacturers. No significant dose variation was observed in 6/7 scanners when changing the localizer's tube current.

CONCLUSION

Localizer radiograph shows a significant influence on the radiation exposure but with different outcomes depending on the manufacturer of the CT scanner. Radiologists and radiographers should have a thorough understanding of these differences to assure patients the best examination in terms of radiation dose and image quality.

A CONSORT-compliant prospective randomized controlled trial: radiation dose reducing in computed tomography using an additional lateral scout view combined with automatic tube current modulation: Phantom and patient study

BACKGROUND

Radiation exposure has been a hot point in research field of computed tomography (CT). Recently, automated tube current modulation (ATCM) has emerged as an important technique to reduce radiation exposure. Many studies have shown that the difference in scout view would affect modulation. This prospective randomized controlled study is aimed to investigate the impact of an additional lateral scout view on radiation dose and image quality in CT using ACTM.

METHODS

Combined with ATCM (Care Dose 4D) on multidetector CT, 2 thoracic phantom CT image series were acquired in which planning was conducted with either an anteroposterior (AP) or an AP-lateral scout view. Also, 410 patients underwent thoracic CT examinations using Care Dose 4D modulation and were randomized to either a scan planned with an AP-lateral scout or a single AP scout. Effects of the different scout views on applied effective milliampere seconds (mAs), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length-product (DLP) were analyzed. The quality of patient CT images was also assessed. Data were analyzed using independent t tests and linear correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with AP groups, the mean CTDIvol (phantom, 0.89 ± 0.08 vs 1.36 ± 0.26 mGy, P < .001; in patients, 1.12 [0.96, 1.34] vs 2.16 [1.66, 2.64] mGy, P < .001) and DLP (in phantom, 26 [23.25, 28] vs 40 [34.25, 48] mGy×cm, P < .001; in patients, 41 [33, 41] vs 77 [60.5, 99.5] mGy×cm, P < .001) were significantly reduced by approximately 50% in AP-lateral scout view group. With the AP-lateral topogram, the radiation dose on different off-center positions was essentially equal (CTDIvol: 0.76-0.99 mGy; DLP: 22-28 mGy×cm effective dose: 0.31-0. 39 mSv). For image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio values in the AP group were similar to those of AP-lateral scout view group.

CONCLUSION

AP combined with an additional lateral scout view using ACTM can significantly reduce the radiation dose without compromising image quality in chest screening CT.