Feasibility of self-gated isotropic radial late-phase MR imaging of the liver

Image Quality Improvement of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Iterative Denoising and Edge Enhancement

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a novel edge enhancement and iterative denoising algorithm in 1.5-T T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) gradient echo (GRE) magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen on image quality, noise levels, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detectability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent a clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging with DCE imaging of the abdomen between June and August 2020 were included in this retrospective, monocentric, institutional review board-approved study. For DCE imaging, a series of 3 volume interpolated breath-hold examinations (VIBEs) was performed. The raw data of all DCE imaging studies were processed twice, once using standard reconstruction (DCES) and again using an edge enhancement and iterative denoising approach (DCEDE). All imaging studies were randomly reviewed by 2 radiologists independently regarding noise levels, arterial contrast, sharpness of vessels, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4, with 4 being the best. Furthermore, lesion detectability was evaluated using the same ranking system.

RESULTS

All 50 imaging studies were successfully reconstructed with both methods. Interreader agreement (Cohen κ) was substantial to perfect for both readers. Arterial contrast and sharpness of vessels were rated superior by both readers with a median of 4 in DCEDE versus a median of 3 in DCES (P < 0.001). Furthermore, noise levels as well as overall image quality were rated higher with a median of 4 in DCEDE compared with a median of 3 in DCES (P < 0.001). Lesion detectability was evaluated to be superior in DCEDE with a median of 4 versus DCES with a median of 3 (P < 0.001). Consequently, diagnostic confidence was also rated to be superior in DCEDE with a median of 4 versus DCES with a median of 3 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Iterative denoising and edge enhancement are feasible in DCE imaging of the abdomen providing superior arterial contrast, noise levels, and overall image quality. Furthermore, lesion detectability and diagnostic confidence were significantly improved using this novel reconstruction method. Further reduction of acquisition time might be possible via reduction of increased noise levels using this presented method.

Utility of Stack-of-stars Acquisition for Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging without Breath-holding

Purpose:

Post-contrast liver magnetic resonance imaging is typically performed with breath-hold 3D gradient echo sequences. However, breath-holding for >10 s is difficult for some patients. In this study, we compared the quality of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging without breath-holding using the prototype pulse sequences stack-of-stars liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA) (LAVA Star) with or without navigator echoes (LAVA Star_navi+ and LAVA Star_navi−) and Cartesian LAVA with navigator echoes (Cartesian LAVA_navi+).

Methods:

Seventy-two patients were included in this single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. HBP imaging using the three LAVA sequences (Cartesian LAVA_navi+, LAVA Star_navi−, and LAVA Star_navi+) without breath-holding was performed for all patients using a 3T magnetic resonance system. Two independent radiologists qualitatively analyzed (overall image quality, liver edge sharpness, hepatic vein clarity, streak artifacts, and respiratory motion/pulsation artifacts) HBP images taken by the three sequences using a five-point scale. Quantitative evaluations were also performed by calculating the liver-to-spleen, -lesion, and -portal vein (PV) signal intensity ratios. The results were compared between the three sequences using the Friedman test.

Results:

LAVA Star_navi+ showed the best image quality and hepatic vein clarity (P < 0.0001). LAVA Star_navi− showed the lowest image quality (P < 0.0001–0.0106). LAVA Star_navi+ images showed fewer streak artifacts than LAVA Star_navi− images (P < 0.0001), while Cartesian LAVA_navi+ images showed no streak artifacts. Cartesian LAVA_navi+ images showed stronger respiratory motion/pulsation artifacts than the others (P < 0.0001). LAVA Star_navi− images showed the highest liver-to-spleen ratios (P < 0.0001–0.0005). Cartesian LAVA_navi+ images showed the lowest liver-to-lesion and -PV ratios (P < 0.0001–0.0108).

Conclusion:

In terms of image quality, the combination of stack-of-stars acquisition and navigator echoes is the best for HBP imaging without breath-holding.

Intra-individual comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MRI using pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of HCCs using LI-RADS

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced multiphasic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme by intra-individual comparison with gadoxetic acid-MRI (EOB-MRI) with regard to image quality and the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 15 patients with 18 HCCs who underwent EOB-MRI using a Cartesian approach and ECA-MRI using the pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme (free-breathing continuous data acquisition for 64 s following ECA injection, generating six images). Two reviewers evaluated the arterial and portal phases of each MRI for artifacts, organ sharpness, and conspicuity of intrahepatic vessels and the hepatic tumors. A Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category was also assigned to each lesion.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the subjective image quality analysis between the arterial phases of two MRIs (p > 0.05). However, ghosting artifact was seen only in EOB-MRI (N = 3). Six HCCs showed different signal intensities in the arterial phase or portal phase between the two MRIs; five HCCs showed arterial hyperenhancement on ECA-MRI, but not on EOB-MRI. The capsule was observed in 15 HCCs on ECA-MRI and 6 HCCs on EOB-MRI. Five and one HCC were assigned as LR-5 and LR-4 with ECA-MRI and LR-4 and LR-3 with EOB-MRI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Free-breathing ECA-enhanced multiphasic liver MRI using a pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition was more sensitive in detecting arterial hyperenhancement of HCC than conventional EOB-MRI, and the image quality was acceptable.

KEY POINTS

• The pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme can be applied to perform free-breathing multiphasic dynamic liver MRI. • Adopting the pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme can improve the detection of arterial enhancement of HCC. • The pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme enables motion-free liver MRI.

Autocalibrating motion-corrected wave-encoding for highly accelerated free-breathing abdominal MRI

PURPOSE

To develop a motion-robust wave-encoding technique for highly accelerated free-breathing abdominal MRI.

METHODS

A comprehensive 3D wave-encoding-based method was developed to enable fast free-breathing abdominal imaging: (a) auto-calibration for wave-encoding was designed to avoid extra scan for coil sensitivity measurement; (b) intrinsic butterfly navigators were used to track respiratory motion; (c) variable-density sampling was included to enable compressed sensing; (d) golden-angle radial-Cartesian hybrid view-ordering was incorporated to improve motion robustness; and (e) localized rigid motion correction was combined with parallel imaging compressed sensing reconstruction to reconstruct the highly accelerated wave-encoded datasets. The proposed method was tested on six subjects and image quality was compared with standard accelerated Cartesian acquisition both with and without respiratory triggering. Inverse gradient entropy and normalized gradient squared metrics were calculated, testing whether image quality was improved using paired t-tests.

RESULTS

For respiratory-triggered scans, wave-encoding significantly reduced residual aliasing and blurring compared with standard Cartesian acquisition (metrics suggesting P < 0.05). For non-respiratory-triggered scans, the proposed method yielded significantly better motion correction compared with standard motion-corrected Cartesian acquisition (metrics suggesting P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The proposed methods can reduce motion artifacts and improve overall image quality of highly accelerated free-breathing abdominal MRI. Magn Reson Med 78:1757-1766, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.