1
|
Reeg A, Braun Y, Sunderbrink D, Hakimi M. Lowest reported dose area product of 2.4 Gy∗cm 2 for ultra-low-dose endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of a standard infrarenal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2024; 10:101496. [PMID: 38764464 PMCID: PMC11099303 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This is a report of successful treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm via standard endovascular aortic repair with an ultra-low dose (ULD) of 2.4 Gy∗cm2 using the latest imaging software in a hybrid operating room. To the best of our knowledge, no case has yet been reported achieving a successful outcome with such ULD values to date. The key factors to achieving an ULD regarding the dose area product comprise the right technology, procedural standardization, and team education and training. This case highlights the potential for reducing the radiation dose routinely for patients and staff alike, especially for operating room staff with daily radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Reeg
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Yvonne Braun
- Global Clinical Marketing Surgery, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany
| | - Dirk Sunderbrink
- Global Clinical Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany
| | - Maani Hakimi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Czerny M, Grabenwöger M, Berger T, Aboyans V, Della Corte A, Chen EP, Desai ND, Dumfarth J, Elefteriades JA, Etz CD, Kim KM, Kreibich M, Lescan M, Di Marco L, Martens A, Mestres CA, Milojevic M, Nienaber CA, Piffaretti G, Preventza O, Quintana E, Rylski B, Schlett CL, Schoenhoff F, Trimarchi S, Tsagakis K, Siepe M, Estrera AL, Bavaria JE, Pacini D, Okita Y, Evangelista A, Harrington KB, Kachroo P, Hughes GC. EACTS/STS Guidelines for Diagnosing and Treating Acute and Chronic Syndromes of the Aortic Organ. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 118:5-115. [PMID: 38416090 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Czerny
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Martin Grabenwöger
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria; Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Tim Berger
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Victor Aboyans
- Department of Cardiology, Dupuytren-2 University Hospital, Limoges, France; EpiMaCT, Inserm 1094 & IRD 270, Limoges University, Limoges, France
| | - Alessandro Della Corte
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy; Cardiac Surgery Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nimesh D Desai
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julia Dumfarth
- University Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - John A Elefteriades
- Aortic Institute at Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christian D Etz
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Karen M Kim
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas at Austin/Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Maximilian Kreibich
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mario Lescan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Luca Di Marco
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andreas Martens
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; The Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Carlos A Mestres
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and the Robert WM Frater Cardiovascular Research Centre, The University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Milan Milojevic
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Research, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Christoph A Nienaber
- Division of Cardiology at the Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Ourania Preventza
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Eduard Quintana
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bartosz Rylski
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christopher L Schlett
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schoenhoff
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Tsagakis
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Siepe
- EACTS Review Coordinator; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anthony L Estrera
- STS Review Coordinator; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Davide Pacini
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Yutaka Okita
- Cardio-Aortic Center, Takatsuki General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Arturo Evangelista
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Cardiovascular Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Departament of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain; Instituto del Corazón, Quirónsalud-Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katherine B Harrington
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas
| | - Puja Kachroo
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - G Chad Hughes
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Czerny M, Grabenwöger M, Berger T, Aboyans V, Della Corte A, Chen EP, Desai ND, Dumfarth J, Elefteriades JA, Etz CD, Kim KM, Kreibich M, Lescan M, Di Marco L, Martens A, Mestres CA, Milojevic M, Nienaber CA, Piffaretti G, Preventza O, Quintana E, Rylski B, Schlett CL, Schoenhoff F, Trimarchi S, Tsagakis K. EACTS/STS Guidelines for diagnosing and treating acute and chronic syndromes of the aortic organ. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezad426. [PMID: 38408364 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Czerny
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Grabenwöger
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria
- Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tim Berger
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Victor Aboyans
- Department of Cardiology, Dupuytren-2 University Hospital, Limoges, France
- EpiMaCT, Inserm 1094 & IRD 270, Limoges University, Limoges, France
| | - Alessandro Della Corte
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nimesh D Desai
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia Dumfarth
- University Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - John A Elefteriades
- Aortic Institute at Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christian D Etz
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Karen M Kim
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas at Austin/Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Maximilian Kreibich
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mario Lescan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Luca Di Marco
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andreas Martens
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- The Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Carlos A Mestres
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and the Robert WM Frater Cardiovascular Research Centre, The University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Milan Milojevic
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Research, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Christoph A Nienaber
- Division of Cardiology at the Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Ourania Preventza
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Eduard Quintana
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bartosz Rylski
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Department University Heart Center Freiburg Bad Krozingen, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christopher L Schlett
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schoenhoff
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Tsagakis
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsitsiou Y, Velan B, Ross R, Lakshminarayan R, Rogers A, Hamady M. National UK Survey of Radiation Doses During Endovascular Aortic Interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:92-100. [PMID: 37968425 PMCID: PMC10770209 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03592-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endovascular aortic repair (EAR) interventions, endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), are associated with significant radiation exposures. We aimed to investigate the radiation doses from real-world practice and propose diagnostic reference level (DRL) for the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS Radiation data and essential demographics were retrospectively collected from 24 vascular and interventional radiology centres in the UK for all patients undergoing EAR-standard EVAR or complex, branched/fenestrated (BEVAR/FEVAR), and TEVAR-between 2018 and 2021. The data set was further categorised according to X-ray unit type, either fixed or mobile. The proposed national DRL is the 75th percentile of the collective medians for procedure KAP (kerma area product), cumulative air kerma (CAK), fluoroscopy KAP and CAK. RESULTS Data from 3712 endovascular aortic procedures were collected, including 2062 cases were standard EVAR, 906 cases of BEVAR/FEVAR and 509 cases of TEVAR. The majority of endovascular procedures (3477/3712) were performed on fixed X-ray units. The proposed DRL for KAP was 162 Gy cm2, 175 Gy cm2 and 266 Gy cm2 for standard EVAR, TEVAR and BEVAR/FEVAR, respectively. CONCLUSION The development of DRLs is pertinent to EAR procedures as the first step to optimise the radiation risks to patients and staff while maintaining the highest patient care and paving the way for steps to reduce radiation exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Tsitsiou
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed St, London, W2 1NY, UK.
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Bar Velan
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed St, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Rebecca Ross
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed St, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | | | - Andy Rogers
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mohamad Hamady
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed St, London, W2 1NY, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gizewski ER, Verius M, Rehani MM, Jaschke W. Cumulative Effective Dose During Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions (FGI): Analysis of More Than 5000 FGIs in a Single European Center. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:101-108. [PMID: 38110753 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03604-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI) has increased significantly over time. However, little attention has been paid to possible stochastic radiation effects. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the number of patients who received cumulative effective doses over 100 mSv during FGI procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five thousand five hundred and fifty four classified FGI procedures were included. Radiation dose data, retrieved from an in-house-dose-management system, was analysed. Effective doses and cumulative effective doses (CED) were calculated. Patients who received a CED > 100 mSv were identified. Radiology reports, patient age, imaging and clinical data of these patients were used to identify reasons for CED ≥ 100 mSv. RESULTS One Hundred and thirty two (41.1% female) of 3981 patients received a CED > 100 mSy, with a mean CED of 173.5 ± 84.5 mSv. Mean age at first intervention was 66.1 ± 11.7 years. 81 (61.4%) of 132 were older than 64 years, one patient was < 30 years. 110 patients received ≥ 100 mSv within one year (83.4%), through FGIs: EVAR, pelvic/mesenteric interventions (stent or embolization), hepatic interventions (chemoembolization, TIPSS), embolization of cerebral aneurysms or arterio-venous-malformations. CONCLUSIONS Substantial CED may occur in a small but not ignorable fraction of patients (~ 3%) undergoing FGIs. Approximately 2/3rd of patients may most likely not encounter radiation-related stochastic effects due to life-threatening diseases and age at first treatment > 65 years but 1/3rd may. Patients undergoing more than one FGI (77%) carry a higher risk of accumulating effective doses > 100 mSv. Remarkably, 23% received a mean CED 162.2 ± 72.3 mSv in a single procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke R Gizewski
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Verius
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Madan M Rehani
- Global Outreach for Radiation Protection Program; Chair, Radiation Safety Committee, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 244, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Werner Jaschke
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tzanis E, Damilakis J. A neural network-enhanced methodology for the rapid establishment of local DRLs in interventional radiology: EVAR as a case example. Phys Med 2023; 114:103140. [PMID: 37741153 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a neural network-enhanced workflow for the automatic and rapid establishment/update of local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in interventional radiology (IR) using endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures as a case example. METHODS Radiation dose reports were collected retrospectively for 46 consecutive EVAR procedures. These reports served as demonstrative data for the development of the proposed methodology. An algorithm was developed to receive multiple dose reports, automatically extract the kerma area product (KAP), air kerma (Ka,r), number of exposure images, and fluoroscopy time (FT) from each report and calculate the first, second, third quartiles as well as the maximum and minimum values of the extracted parameters. To extract the values of interest from the dose reports, Tesseract, an open-source optical character recognition (OCR) engine was employed. Furthermore, the accuracy and time efficiency of the proposed methodology were assessed. Specifically, the values extracted from the algorithm were compared with the ground truth values and the algorithm's processing time was compared with the respective time needed to manually extract and process the values of interest. RESULTS The OCR-based algorithm managed to correctly recognize 182 from the 184 target values, resulting in an accuracy of 99%. Moreover, the proposed pipeline reduced the processing time for the establishment of DRLs by 98%. DRL value for EVAR procedures, set as the third quartile of KAP was found to be 551 Gy*cm2. CONCLUSION An accurate and time-efficient workflow was developed for the establishment of local DRLs in interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftherios Tzanis
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - John Damilakis
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones AK, Wunderle KA, Fruscello T, Simanowith M, Cline B, Dharmadhikari S, Duan X, Durack JC, Hirschl D, Kim DS, Mahmood U, Mann SD, Martin C, Metwalli Z, Moirano JM, Neill RA, Newsome J, Padua H, Schoenfeld AH, Miller DL. Patient Radiation Doses in IR Procedures: The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34:544-555.e11. [PMID: 36379286 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To update normative data on fluoroscopy dose indices in the United States for the first time since the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology study in the late 1990s. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy pilot study collected data from March 2018 through December 2019, with 50 fluoroscopes from 10 sites submitting data. Primary radiation dose indices including fluoroscopy time (FT), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), and kerma area product (PKA) were collected for interventional radiology fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. Clinical facility procedure names were mapped to the American College of Radiology (ACR) common procedure lexicon. Distribution parameters including the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th, and 99th percentiles were computed. RESULTS Dose indices were collected for 70,377 FGI procedures, with 50,501 ultimately eligible for analysis. Distribution parameters are reported for 100 ACR Common IDs. FT in minutes, Ka,r in mGy, and PKA in Gy-cm2 are reported in this study as (n; median) for select ACR Common IDs: inferior vena cava filter insertion (1,726; FT: 2.9; Ka,r: 55.8; PKA: 14.19); inferior vena cava filter removal (464; FT: 5.7; Ka,r: 178.6; PKA: 34.73); nephrostomy placement (2,037; FT: 4.1; Ka,r: 39.2; PKA: 6.61); percutaneous biliary drainage (952; FT: 12.4; Ka,r: 160.5; PKA: 21.32); gastrostomy placement (1,643; FT: 3.2; Ka,r: 29.1; PKA: 7.29); and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement (327; FT: 34.8; Ka,r: 813.0; PKA: 181.47). CONCLUSIONS The ACR DIR-Fluoro pilot has provided state-of-the-practice statistics for radiation dose indices from IR FGI procedures. These data can be used to prioritize procedures for radiation optimization, as demonstrated in this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kyle Jones
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Kevin A Wunderle
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Brendan Cline
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Xinhui Duan
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - David Hirschl
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Don-Soo Kim
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Usman Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steve D Mann
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Charles Martin
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Zeyad Metwalli
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey M Moirano
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rebecca A Neill
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Janice Newsome
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Horacio Padua
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Donald L Miller
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Modarai B, Haulon S, Ainsbury E, Böckler D, Vano-Carruana E, Dawson J, Farber M, Van Herzeele I, Hertault A, van Herwaarden J, Patel A, Wanhainen A, Weiss S, Esvs Guidelines Committee, Bastos Gonçalves F, Björck M, Chakfé N, de Borst GJ, Coscas R, Dias NV, Dick F, Hinchliffe RJ, Kakkos SK, Koncar IB, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, Trimarchi S, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Vermassen F, Document Reviewers, Bacher K, Brountzos E, Fanelli F, Fidalgo Domingos LA, Gargiulo M, Mani K, Mastracci TM, Maurel B, Morgan RA, Schneider P. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Radiation Safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:171-222. [PMID: 36130680 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
9
|
Lundh C, Ivarsson J, Falkenberg M, Båth M, Almén A. A MODEL FOR EVALUATING THE USE OF IMAGING IN IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES-POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS ON OPTIMISATION OF RADIATION PROTECTION. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021; 195:139-144. [PMID: 33876241 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The present study focuses on introducing the concept of optimisation and proposing a model, including evaluation of image quality, to be used in the clinical routines where image-guided intervention is being performed. The overall aim of the study was to develop a model for evaluating the use of imaging in X-ray-guided interventional procedures and its possible implications on optimisation of radiation protection. In the search for an adequate evaluation model, data from endovascular interventions of the aorta (EVAR procedures) were used. The procedure was schematically described in steps. Every imaging event was connected to the steps in the medical procedure and was also described with the purpose of the imaging event. Available technical, as well as procedural parameters, were studied and analysed. Data were collected from the X-ray equipment for 70 EVAR procedures and, out of these, 12 procedures were randomly selected to be recorded on video to understand the procedure better. It was possible to describe the EVAR procedures in a general way with explanations of the clinical purpose connected to each imaging event. Possible quality parameters of the procedure were identified for the imaging events (radiation dose, image quality). The model method still needs to be refined and will then be applied to clinical data and to other clinical procedures to test the validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lundh
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - J Ivarsson
- Department of Applied IT, University of Göteborg, SE-412 96, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - M Falkenberg
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - M Båth
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - A Almén
- Department of Radiation Protection, Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, SE-171 16, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine (ITM), Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Efthymiou FO, Metaxas VI, Dimitroukas CP, Kakkos SK, Panayiotakis GS. KERMA-AREA PRODUCT, ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE AND EFFECTIVE DOSE IN ABDOMINAL ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2021; 194:121-134. [PMID: 34227656 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate patient radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures. Fluoroscopy time (FT) and kerma-area product (KAP) were recorded from 87 patients that underwent EVAR procedures with a mobile C-arm fluoroscopy system. Effective dose (ED) and organs' doses were calculated utilising appropriate conversion coefficients based on the recorded KAP values. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was calculated based on KAP values and technical parameters. The mean FT was 22.7 min (range 6.4-76.8 min), resulting in a mean KAP of 36.6 Gy cm2 (range 2.0-167.8 Gy cm2), a mean ED of 6.2 mSv (range 0.3-28.5 mSv) and a mean ESD of 458 mGy (range 26-2098 mGy). The corresponding median values were 17.4 min, 25.6 Gy cm2, 4.4 mSv and 320 mGy. The threshold of 2 Gy for skin erythema was exceeded in two procedures for a focus-to-skin distance (FSD) of 40 cm and six procedures when an FSD of 30 cm was considered. The highest doses absorbed by the adrenals, kidneys, spleen and pancreas and ranged between 3.7 and 313.3 mGy (average 66.8 mGy), 3.3 and 285.1 mGy (average 60.8 mGy), 1.3 and 111.1 mGy (average 23.7 mGy), 1.1 and 92.1 mGy (average 19.6 mGy), respectively. A wide range of patient doses was reported in the literature. The radiation dose received by the patients was comparative or lower than most of the previously reported values. However, higher doses can be revealed due to the X-ray system's non-optimum use and extended FTs, mainly affected by complex clinical conditions, patients' body habitus and vascular surgeon experience. The large variation of patient doses highlights the potential to optimise the EVAR procedure by considering the balance between the radiation dose and the required image quality. Additional studies need to be conducted in increasing the vascular surgeons' awareness regarding patient dose and radiation protection issues during EVAR procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fotios O Efthymiou
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Vasileios I Metaxas
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Christos P Dimitroukas
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Stavros K Kakkos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - George S Panayiotakis
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rial R, Vañó E. Understanding the Basis of Radiation Protection for Endovascular Procedures: Occupational and Patients. EJVES Vasc Forum 2021; 51:20-22. [PMID: 34095891 PMCID: PMC8163953 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Some concepts of radiation protection are not well understood and must be refreshed periodically. The basic knowledge that a vascular surgeon must have about radiation protection for patients and staff is summarised. Report Diagnostic reference levels are a form of investigation into the medical exposure of patients during diagnostic and endovascular procedures that help to optimise them. Radiological quantities such as dose area product, also known as kerma area product and cumulative dose, are the most relevant to the patient. Equivalent dose, in mSv, determines the dose limits for staff. The effective dose (related to absorbed dose), also in mSv, represents the global risk of cancer and hereditary effects. For patient protection, the most important factors are fluoroscopy time, collimation, magnification, keeping the patient as near as possible to the image detector and as far as possible away from the tube, and trying to work in fluoroscope mode. Regarding occupational protection, distance, shielding, and dosimetry are the most important. Discussion With the increased use of endovascular procedures, radiation protection is an issue that has grown in importance. Radiation protection is based on three principles: justification; optimisation; and dose limits. Every action focused on reducing a patient's radiation dose will also reduce the dose to staff. Basic principles such as “the further away the better”, “always use a lead apron, thyroid protector, and lead glasses”, and “do not forget to wear personal dosimeters” must be remembered at all times. Radiation protection focuses on healthcare staff and patients. Diagnostic reference levels are essential in standard procedures. Operators should know their personal dose and radiation limits. Time, distance, and shielding are important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Rial
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital HM Torrelodones, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eliseo Vañó
- Radiology Department Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tzanis E, Perisinakis K, Ioannou CV, Tsetis D, Damilakis J. A novel personalized dosimetry method for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:6547-6554. [PMID: 33675386 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07789-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate radiation doses for the primarily irradiated organs/tissues of patients subjected to standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures using a novel personalized dosimetry method. METHODS Dosimetric and anthropometric data were collected prospectively for eight patients who underwent standard EVAR procedures. Patient-specific Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate organ/tissue doses from each of the fluoroscopic and digital subtraction angiography acquisitions involved in EVAR. Individual-specific cumulative absorbed doses were estimated for the skin, spinal bone marrow, heart, kidneys, liver, colon, bladder, pancreas, stomach, and spleen and compared to corresponding values estimated through a commercially available dosimetric software package that employs standardized phantoms. RESULTS The highest organ/tissue radiation doses from EVAR were found for the skin, spinal bone marrow, kidneys, and spleen as 192.4 mGy, 96.7 mGy, 72.9 mGy, and 33.6 mGy respectively, while the doses to the heart, liver, colon, bladder, pancreas, and stomach were 6.3 mGy, 14.4 mGy, 18.4 mGy, 14.8 mGy, 21.6 mGy, and 11.2 mGy respectively. Corresponding dose values using standardized phantoms were found to differ up to 151%. CONCLUSION Considerable radiation doses may be received by primarily exposed organs/tissues during standard EVAR. The specific size/anatomy of the patient and the variation in exposure parameters/beam angulation between different projections commonly involved in EVAR procedures should be taken into account if reliable organ dose data are to be derived. KEY POINTS • A novel patient-specific dosimetry method was utilized to estimate radiation doses to the primarily irradiated organs/tissues of patients subjected to standard endovascular aneurysm repair procedures. • The use of standardized mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms to derive organ dose from fluoroscopically guided procedures may result in considerable inaccuracies due to differences in the assumed organ position/volume/shape compared to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftherios Tzanis
- Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion, 71003, Crete, Greece
| | - Kostas Perisinakis
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Crete, Greece
| | - Christos V Ioannou
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Crete, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tsetis
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Crete, Greece
| | - John Damilakis
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kakkos SK, Efthymiou FO, Metaxas VI, Dimitroukas CP, Panayiotakis GS. Factors affecting radiation exposure in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a pilot study. INT ANGIOL 2020; 40:125-130. [PMID: 33315209 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.20.04508-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation exposure during endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is a potential issue. Several studies have identified factors affecting radiation exposure, although they are limited. The aim of this study was to identify independent factors affecting radiation exposure in patients with AAA undergoing standard EVAR. METHODS Forty-eight consecutive patients underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal AAA managed between April 2019 and April 2020. Fluoroscopy time (FT) and kerma area product (KAP) were the main outcome measures. RESULTS Median (interquartile range) FT and KAP values were 1018 (653-1619) s and 2.68 (2.08-3.81) mGy·m2, respectively. C3 Excluder graft use and main body insertion site from the right femoral were associated with significantly lower FT. Coronary artery disease, endografts with two docking limbs, AAA diameter, neck angle and length, procedure duration, contrast amount, and hospitalization were associated with significantly higher FT. Neck angle was the single independent perioperative factor related to FT higher than the median value observed in the study (P=0.004, odds ratio: 1.073, 95% confidence interval: 1.023-1.126). The use of the C3 Excluder device was associated with lower KAP. AAA diameter, neck angle, procedure duration, contrast medium amount and postoperative hospitalization were associated with higher KAP. AAA diameter was the single independent factor related to KAP higher than the median value observed in the study (P=0.013, odds ratio: 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-10.56). CONCLUSIONS This study has identified factors affecting radiation exposure during standard EVAR for infrarenal AAAs. These factors should be taken into account when contemplating AAA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros K Kakkos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras, Greece -
| | - Fotios O Efthymiou
- Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Vasileios I Metaxas
- Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Massiot N, Ben Abdallah I, Duprey A, Leygnac S, Corcos O, Castier Y, El Batti S. Multicentre Evaluation of an Extra Low Dose Protocol to Reduce Radiation Exposure in Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60:925-931. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
15
|
Rial R, Vañó E, Del Río-Solá ML, Fernández JM, Sánchez RM, Camblor Santervás LA, Bellmunt S, Blanco E, El Amrani Joutey M, González Cañas E, Gomez Palones FJ, González Fajardo JA, González Tabares E, Llagostera Pujol S, Rielo Arias F, Salmerón Febres LM, Aramendi Arieta-Araunabeña C, Iborra Ortega E, Guerra Requena M. National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Optimisation Strategies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60:837-842. [PMID: 32912764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has highlighted the large number of medical specialties using fluoroscopy outside imaging departments without programmes of radiation protection (RP) for patients and staff. Vascular surgery is one of these specialties and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is one of the most challenging procedures requiring RP guidance and optimisation actions. The recent European Directive on Basic Safety Standards requires the use and regular update of diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for interventional procedures. The objective of the study was to know the doses of patients undergoing EVAR with mobile Xray systems and with hybrid rooms (fixed Xray systems), to obtain national DRLs and suggest optimisation actions. METHODS The Spanish Chapter of Endovascular Surgery launched a national survey that involved hospitals for 10 autonomous communities representing the 77% of the Spanish population (46.7 million inhabitants). Patient dose values from mobile Xray systems were available from nine hospitals (sample of 165 EVAR procedures) and data from hybrid rooms, from seven hospitals, with dosimetric data from 123 procedures. The initial national DRLs have been obtained, as the third quartile of the median values from the different centres involved in the survey. RESULTS The proposed national DRLs are 278 Gy cm2 for hybrid rooms and 87 Gy cm2 for mobile Xray systems, and for cumulative air kerma (cumulative AK) at the patient entrance reference point, 1403 mGy for hybrid rooms, and 292 mGy for mobile systems. CONCLUSION An audit of patient doses for EVAR procedures to identify optimised imaging protocol strategies is needed. It is also appropriate to evaluate the diagnostic information required for EVAR procedures. The increase by a factor of 3.2 (for kerma area product) and 4.8 (for cumulative AK) in the DRLs needs to be justified when the procedures are performed in the hybrid rooms rather than with mobile Xray systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Rial
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Eliseo Vañó
- Medical Physics Service, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and IdISSC, Madrid, Spain; Radiology Department, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria L Del Río-Solá
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital Clinico Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - José M Fernández
- Medical Physics Service, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto M Sánchez
- Medical Physics Service, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and IdISSC, Madrid, Spain; Radiology Department, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sergi Bellmunt
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital Vall D'hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Estrella Blanco
- Vascular Surgery Department, Guadalajara University Hospital, Guadalajara, Spain
| | | | | | - Francisco J Gomez Palones
- Head of Vascular Surgery, Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elena Iborra Ortega
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Editor's Choice - Comprehensive Literature Review of Radiation Levels During Endovascular Aortic Repair in Cathlabs and Operating Theatres. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60:374-385. [PMID: 32682690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Occupational exposure is a growing concern among the endovascular specialist community. Several types of imaging equipment are available, such as mobile C arms or hybrid rooms, and some have been shown to deliver higher levels of radiation. A literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting dose data during standard (EVAR) and complex abdominal aortic endovascular repair (fenestrated/branched EVAR [F/BEVAR]). METHODS A search of the MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases was performed by two independent investigators using the medical subject heading terms "aortic aneurysms", "radiation", and "humans" over a search period of 10 years. Studies with full text available in English and reporting radiation data independently from the imaging equipment type were included. Experimental studies were excluded. RESULTS The lowest dose-area product levels during EVAR and F/BEVAR were identified in hybrid rooms, while the highest were with fixed systems. When adherence to the as low as reasonably achievable principles was stipulated by the authors, dose reports tended to be among the lowest. Several studies, especially of F/BEVAR, report concerning levels of radiation for both patients and staff. CONCLUSION Modern imaging equipment type, team involvement with radiation management, and the support of recent imaging technologies such as fusion help to reduce the dose delivered during standard and complex EVAR. Investment in modern imaging technology should be considered in every centre providing endovascular management of aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
|
17
|
Tzanis E, Ioannou CV, Tsetis D, Lioudaki S, Matthaiou N, Damilakis J. Complexity-based local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures. Phys Med 2020; 73:89-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
|
18
|
Effective Dose Assessment for Patients Undergoing Contemporary Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214:158-170. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
19
|
Patient dose in angiographic interventional procedures: A multicentre study in Italy. Phys Med 2019; 64:273-292. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
20
|
Wermelink B, Willigendael EM, Smit C, Beuk RJ, Brusse-Keizer M, Meerwaldt R, Geelkerken RH. Radiation exposure in an endovascular aortic aneurysm repair program after introduction of a hybrid operating theater. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1927-1934.e2. [PMID: 31327609 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A hybrid operating theater (HOT) enables optimal image quality, improved ergonomics, and excellent sterility for complex endovascular and hybrid procedures. We hypothesize that the commissioning of a new HOT involves a learning curve. It is unclear how steep the learning curve of these advanced HOTs is. The main purpose of this research was to evaluate radiation exposure parameters in a new HOT for a team of vascular surgeons experienced with infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures in a conventional operating room with a mobile C-arm. In addition, a comparison of the dose-area product (DAP) achieved in this study and in the literature was made. METHODS Before commissioning of the HOT, four vascular surgeons completed a comprehensive HOT training program. From the commissioning of the HOT, clinical and procedural data for all consecutive acute and elective patients treated with EVAR were retrospectively collected for a period of 18 months (January 2016-June 2017). A literature review was conducted of the dose-area product in EVAR procedures performed with a dedicated fixed system or mobile C-arm to analyze how this study performed compared with the literature. RESULTS In the 18-month study period, 77 patients were treated with EVAR (59 electively and 18 acutely), from whom the data were obtained. There was no significant change in radiation exposure parameters over time. From the commissioning of the HOT, EVAR procedures were performed with radiation exposure parameters similar to those of studies found in experienced vascular centers using fixed systems. CONCLUSIONS Concerning radiation exposure parameters, the commissioning of a new HOT was not accompanied by a learning curve. Radiation exposure parameters achieved in this study were similar to those of studies from experienced and dedicated vascular centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Wermelink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; TechMed Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
| | - Edith M Willigendael
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Casper Smit
- Medical Technology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Roland J Beuk
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robbert Meerwaldt
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Robert H Geelkerken
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; TechMed Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Occupational exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and aortoiliac percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) procedures. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2019; 124:539-545. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-00985-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
22
|
Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kölbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, ESVS Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document reviewers, Björck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 57:8-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 873] [Impact Index Per Article: 174.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
23
|
Almén A, Lundh C, Båth M. Challenges assessing radiation risk in image-guided treatments-implications on optimisation of radiological protection. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2018; 38:1064-1076. [PMID: 29900877 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aacc83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The present work explores challenges when assessing organ dose and effective dose concerning image-guided treatments. During these treatments considerable x-ray imaging is employed using technically advanced angiographic x-ray equipment. Thus, the radiation dose to organs and the related radiation risk are relatively difficult to assess. This has implications on the optimisation process, in which assessing radiation dose is one important part. In this study, endovascular aortic repair treatments were investigated. Organ dose and effective dose were assessed using Monte Carlo calculations together with a detailed specification of the exposure situation and patient size. The resulting normalised organ dose and effective dose with respect to kerma-area product for patient sizes and radiation qualities representative for the patient group were evaluated. The variability and uncertainty were investigated and their possible impact on optimisation of radiation protection was discussed. Exposure parameters, source to detector distances etc varied between treatments and also varied between image acquisitions during one treatment. Thus the derived normalised organ dose and effective dose exhibited a large range of values depending greatly on used exposure parameters and patient configuration. The derived normalised values for effective dose varied approximately between 0.05 and 0.30 mSv per Gy·cm2 when taking patient sizes and exposure parameters into consideration, the values for organ doses exhibited even larger variation. The study shows a possible systematic error for derived organ doses and effective dose up to a factor of 7 if detailed exposure or patient characteristics are not known and/or not taken into consideration. The intra-treatment variability was also substantial and the normalised dose values varied up to a factor of 2 between image acquisitions during one treatment. The study shows that the use of conversion factors that are not adapted to the clinic can cause the radiation dose to be exaggerated or underestimated considerably. A conclusion from the present study is that the systematic error could be large and should be estimated together with random errors. A large uncertainty makes it difficult to detect true differences in radiation dose between methods and technology-a prerequisite for optimising radiation protection for image-guided treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Almén
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden. Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|