Efficacy of double inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of the synovium in the femoro-patellar joint without contrast enhancement

Inflammatory Knee Synovitis: Evaluation of an Accelerated FLAIR Sequence Compared With Standard Contrast-Enhanced Imaging

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value and accuracy of a deep learning (DL)-accelerated fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with fat saturation (FS) in patients with inflammatory synovitis of the knee.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with suspected knee synovitis were retrospectively included between January and September 2023. All patients underwent a 3 T knee magnetic resonance imaging including a DL-accelerated noncontrast FLAIR FS sequence (acquisition time: 1 minute 38 seconds) and a contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted FS sequence (acquisition time: 4 minutes 50 seconds), which served as reference standard. All knees were scored by 2 radiologists using the semiquantitative modified knee synovitis score, effusion synovitis score, and Hoffa inflammation score. Diagnostic confidence, image quality, and image artifacts were rated on separate Likert scales. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the semiquantitative scores. Interreader and intrareader reproducibility were calculated using Cohen κ.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (mean age, 52 ± 17 years; 28 females) were included in the study. Twenty-seven patients (49%) had mild to moderate synovitis (synovitis score 6-13), and 17 patients (31%) had severe synovitis (synovitis score >14). No signs of synovitis were detected in 11 patients (20%) (synovitis score <5). Semiquantitative assessment of the whole knee synovitis score showed no significant difference between the DL-accelerated FLAIR sequence and the CE T1-weighted sequence (mean FLAIR score: 10.69 ± 8.83, T1 turbo spin-echo FS: 10.74 ± 10.32; P = 0.521). Both interreader and intrareader reproducibility were excellent (range Cohen κ [0.82-0.96]).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of inflammatory knee synovitis using a DL-accelerated noncontrast FLAIR FS sequence was feasible and equivalent to CE T1-weighted FS imaging.

Fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence with fat suppression as an alternative to contrast-enhanced MRI in pediatric synovitis

BACKGROUND

Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence (FLAIR) with fat suppression (FS) has not been validated in children.

OBJECTIVE

Compare FLAIR to T1-weighted post contrast (T1CE) in the detection of knee synovitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Institutional review board (IRB) waived consent. Children who underwent T1CE and FLAIR sequences of the knee on a 3-T magnet from April 2021 to December 2021 were included. Two pediatric radiologists assessed axial FLAIR and T1CE images for synovitis and synovial thickness. Reliability and agreement were assessed. Sensitivities, specificities, and accuracy were calculated for FLAIR using T1CE as reference standard.

RESULTS

In total, 42 knees (39 patients) were assessed (median age 12.9 years (2.3-17.8 years); 62% male, 38% female). Readers judged 20/42 (48%) knees to have synovitis. Sensitivity of FLAIR for reader 1 was 79% (19/24; 95% CI 0.58, 0.93) and 84% (16/19; 95% CI 0.60, 0.97) for reader 2. Specificity of FLAIR for reader 1 was 94% (17/18; 95% CI 0.73, 1) and 83% (19/23; 95% CI 0.61, 0.95) for reader 2. Accuracy for readers 1 and 2 was 86% (36/42; 95% CI 0.71, 0.95) and 83% (35/42; 95% CI 0.69, 0.93), respectively. Inter-reader reliability was good (0.75-0.90) for synovial measurements for FLAIR (ICC = 0.80; 95% CI 0.71, 0.86) and moderate for T1 CE (ICC = 0.62 (95% CI 0.48, 0.73)).

CONCLUSION

FLAIR FS depicts synovium in the pediatric knee with similar reliability to T1 CE and may be an acceptable alternative to contrast in the initial diagnosis of synovitis.

Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Imaging of the Painful Knee

Chronic knee pain is a common condition. Causes of knee pain include trauma, inflammation, and degeneration, but in many patients the pathophysiology remains unknown. Recent developments in advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and molecular imaging facilitate more in-depth research focused on the pathophysiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain and more specifically inflammation. The forthcoming new insights can help develop better targeted treatment, and some imaging techniques may even serve as imaging biomarkers for predicting and assessing treatment response in the future. This review highlights the latest developments in perfusion MRI, diffusion MRI, and molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/MRI and their application in the painful knee. The primary focus is synovial inflammation, also known as synovitis. Bone perfusion and bone metabolism are also addressed.

Evaluation of the knee joint with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

The knee joint relies on a combination of deep and superficial structures for stability and function. Both ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging are extremely useful in evaluating these structures and associated pathology. This article reviews a combination of critical anatomic structures, joint abnormalities, and pathologic conditions at the knee joint, while highlighting the merits, limitations, and pitfalls of the two imaging modalities. A clear appreciation of each method paired with its relative strengths will aid in expediting diagnosis and appropriate treatment for a wide range of knee joint conditions.

Diagnostic performance of double inversion recovery MRI sequence for synovitis of the wrist joints in rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of double inversion recovery (DIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for synovitis of the wrist joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Participants with newly diagnosed RA were enrolled between November 2019 and November 2020. MRI examinations of the wrist joints were performed using a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging sequence (CE-T1WI) and DIR sequence. We measured synovitis score, number of synovial areas, synovial volume, mean synovium-to-bone signal ratio (SBR), and synovial contrast-to-noise ratio (SNR). The inter-reviewer agreement rated on a four-point scale was evaluated by calculating the weighted k statistics. Two MRI sequences were assessed using Bland-Altman analyses, and the diagnostic performance of DIR images was calculated using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 47 participants were evaluated, and 282 joint regions in 5076 images were reviewed by two readers. There was no significant difference in synovitis scores (P = 0.67), number of synovial areas (P = 0.89), and synovial volume (P = 0.086) between the two MRI sequences. DIR images showed better SBR and SNR (all P < 0.01). There was good agreement between the two reviewers in terms of synovitis distribution (κ = 0.79). The synovitis was well agreed upon by the two readers according to Bland-Altman analyses. Using CE-T1WI as the reference standard, DIR imaging demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 84.6% at the patient level.

CONCLUSION

The non-contrast DIR sequence showed good consistency with CE-T1WI and potential for evaluating synovitis in patients with RA.

Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequence with Fat Suppression for Assessment of Ankle Synovitis without Contrast Enhancement: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced MRI

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence with fat suppression (FLAIR-FS) for the assessment of ankle synovitis without contrast enhancement. FLAIR-FS and contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted sequences (CE-T1) of 94 ankles were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists. Grading of synovial visibility (four-point scale) and semi-quantitative scoring of synovial thickness (three-point scale) were performed in four compartments of the ankle in both sequences. Synovial visibility and thickness in FLAIR-FS and CE-T1 images were compared, and agreement between both sequences was assessed. Synovial visibility grades and synovial thickness scores for FLAIR-FS images were lower than those for CE-T1 images (reader 1, p = 0.016, p < 0.001; reader 2, p = 0.009, p < 0.001). Dichotomized synovial visibility grades (partial vs. full visibility) were not significantly different between both sequences. The agreement in synovial thickness scores between the FLAIR-FS and CE-T1 images was moderate to substantial (κ = 0.41-0.65). The interobserver agreement between the two readers was fair for synovial visibility (κ = 0.27-0.32) and moderate to substantial for synovial thickness (κ = 0.54-0.74). In conclusion, FLAIR-FS is a feasible MRI sequence for the evaluation of ankle synovitis without contrast enhancement.

Double inversion recovery MRI versus contrast-enhanced MRI for evaluation of knee synovitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Double inversion recovery (DIR) MRI has the potential to accentuate the synovium without using contrast agents, as it allows simultaneous signal suppression of fluid and fat. The purpose of this study was (1) to compare DIR MRI to conventional contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI for delineation of the synovium in the knee in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and (2) to assess the agreement between DIR MRI and CE-MRI regarding maximal synovial thickness measurements.

RESULTS

In this prospective study, 26 children with JIA who consecutively underwent 3.0-T knee MRI between January 2018 and January 2021 were included (presence of knee arthritis: 13 [50%]; median age: 14 years [interquartile range [IQR]: 11-17]; 14 girls). Median confidence to depict the synovium (0-100 mm visual analogue scale; scored by 2 readers [consensus based]) was 88 (IQR: 79-97) for DIR MRI versus 100 (IQR: 100-100) for CE-MRI (p value = < .001). Maximal synovial thickness per child (millimeters; scored by 4 individual readers) on DIR MRI was greater (p value = < .001) in the children with knee arthritis (2.4 mm [IQR: 2.1-3.1]) than in those without knee arthritis (1.4 mm [IQR: 1.0-1.6]). Good inter-technique agreement for maximal synovial thickness per child was observed (r_s = 0.93 [p value = < .001]; inter-reader reliability: ICC DIR MRI = 0.87 [p value = < .001], ICC CE-MRI = 0.90 [p value = < .001]).

CONCLUSION

DIR MRI adequately delineated the synovium in the knee of children with JIA and enabled synovial thickness measurement similar to that of CE-MRI. Our results demonstrate that DIR MRI should be considered as a child-friendly alternative to CE-MRI for evaluation of synovitis in children with (suspected) JIA.

Imaging of Synovial Inflammation in Osteoarthritis, From the AJR Special Series on Inflammation

Synovitis, inflammation of the synovial membrane, is a common manifestation in osteoarthritis (OA) and is recognized to play a role in the complex pathophysiology of OA. Increased recognition of the importance of synovitis in the OA disease process and potential as a target for treatment has increased the need for non-invasive detection and characterization of synovitis using medical imaging. Numerous imaging methods can assess synovitis involvement in OA with varying sensitivity and specificity as well as complexity. This article reviews the role of contrast-enhanced MRI, conventional MRI, novel unenhanced MRI, gray-scale ultrasound (US), and power Doppler US in the assessment of synovitis in patients with OA. The role of imaging in disease evaluation as well as challenges in conventional imaging methods are discussed. We also provide an overview into the potential utility of emerging techniques for imaging of early inflammation and molecular inflammatory markers of synovitis, including quantitative MRI, superb microvascular imaging, and PET. The potential development of therapeutic treatments targeting inflammatory features, particularly in early OA, would greatly increase the importance of these imaging methods for clinical decision making and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.

Non-contrast MRI of synovitis in the knee using quantitative DESS

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether synovitis graded by radiologists using hybrid quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) images can be utilized as a non-contrast approach to assess synovitis in the knee, compared against the reference standard of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI).

METHODS

Twenty-two knees (11 subjects) with moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) were scanned using CE-MRI, qDESS with a high diffusion weighting (qDESS_High), and qDESS with a low diffusion weighting (qDESS_Low). Four radiologists graded the overall impression of synovitis, their diagnostic confidence, and regional grading of synovitis severity at four sites (suprapatellar pouch, intercondylar notch, and medial and lateral peripatellar recesses) in the knee using a 4-point scale. Agreement between CE-MRI and qDESS, inter-rater agreement, and intra-rater agreement were assessed using a linearly weighted Gwet's AC2.

RESULTS

Good agreement was seen between CE-MRI and both qDESS_Low (AC2 = 0.74) and qDESS_High (AC2 = 0.66) for the overall impression of synovitis, but both qDESS sequences tended to underestimate the severity of synovitis compared to CE-MRI. Good inter-rater agreement was seen for both qDESS sequences (AC2 = 0.74 for qDESS_Low, AC2 = 0.64 for qDESS_High), and good intra-rater agreement was seen for both sequences as well (qDESS_Low AC2 = 0.78, qDESS_High AC2 = 0.80). Diagnostic confidence was moderate to high for qDESS_Low (mean = 2.36) and slightly less than moderate for qDESS_High (mean = 1.86), compared to mostly high confidence for CE-MRI (mean = 2.73).

CONCLUSIONS

qDESS shows potential as an alternative MRI technique for assessing the severity of synovitis without the use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent.

KEY POINTS

The use of the quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) sequence for synovitis assessment does not require the use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Preliminary results found that low diffusion-weighted qDESS (qDESS_Low) shows good agreement to contrast-enhanced MRI for characterization of the severity of synovitis, with a relative bias towards underestimation of severity. Preliminary results also found that qDESS_Low shows good inter- and intra-rater agreement for the depiction of synovitis, particularly for readers experienced with the sequence.

Detection of knee synovitis using non-contrast-enhanced qDESS compared with contrast-enhanced MRI

Background

To assess diagnostic accuracy of quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) MRI for detecting synovitis in knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Patients with different degrees of radiographic knee OA were included prospectively. All underwent MRI with both qDESS and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). A linear combination of the two qDESS images can be used to create an image that displays contrast between synovium and the synovial fluid. Synovitis on both qDESS and CE-MRI was assessed semi-quantitatively, using a whole-knee synovitis sum score, indicating no/equivocal, mild, moderate, and severe synovitis. The correlation between sum scores of qDESS and CE-MRI (reference standard) was determined using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of qDESS for detecting different degrees of synovitis, with CE-MRI as reference standard.

Results

In the 31 patients included, very strong correlation was found between synovitis sum scores on qDESS and CE-MRI (ρ = 0.96, p < 0.001), with high absolute agreement (0.84 (95%CI 0.14–0.95)). Mean sum score (SD) values on qDESS 5.16 (3.75) were lower than on CE-MRI 7.13 (4.66), indicating systematically underestimated synovitis severity on qDESS. For detecting mild synovitis or higher, high sensitivity and specificity were found for qDESS (1.00 (95%CI 0.80–1.00) and 0.909 (0.571–1.00), respectively). For detecting moderate synovitis or higher, sensitivity and specificity were good (0.727 (95%CI 0.393–0.927) and 1.00 (0.800–1.00), respectively).

Conclusion

qDESS MRI is able to, however with an underestimation, detect synovitis in patients with knee OA.

Comprehensive assessment of knee joint synovitis at 7 T MRI using contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced sequences

Background

Seven T ultra-high field MRI systems have recently been approved for clinical use by the U.S. and European regulatory agencies. These systems are now being used clinically and will likely be more widely available in the near future. One of the applications of 7 T systems is musculoskeletal disease and particularly peripheral arthritis imaging. Since the introduction of potent anti-rheumatic therapies over the last two decades MRI has gained increasing importance particularly for assessment of disease activity in early stages of several rheumatic disorders. Commonly gadolinium-based contrast agents are used for assessment of synovitis. Due to potential side-effects of gadolinium non-enhanced techniques are desirable that enable visualization of inflammatory disease manifestations. The feasibility of 7 T MRI for evaluation of peripheral arthritis has not been shown up to now. Aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-enhanced MRI at 7 T for the assessment of knee joint synovitis.

Method

Seven T MRI was acquired for 10 patients with an established diagnosis of psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis. The study pulse sequence protocol was comprised of a sagittal intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed (FS), axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) FS, sagittal 3D T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and an axial static 2D T1-weighted FS contrast-enhanced sequence (T1-FS CE). Ordinal scoring on non-enhanced (Hoffa- and effusion-synovitis) and enhanced MRI (11-point synovitis score), and comparison of FLAIR-FS with static T1-FS CE MRI using semiquantitative (SQ) grading and volume assessment was performed. For inter- and intra-reader reliability assessment weighted kappa statistics for ordinal scores and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for continuous variables were used.

Results

The total length of study protocol was 15 min 38 s. Different amounts of synovitis were observed in all patients (mild: n = 3; moderate: n = 5; severe: n = 2). Consistently, SQ assessment yielded significantly lower peripatellar summed synovitis scores for the FLAIR-FS sequence compared to the CE T1-FS sequence (p < 0.01). FLAIR-FS showed significantly lower peripatellar synovial volumes (p < 0.01) compared to CE T1-FS imaging with an average percentage difference of 18.6 ± 9.5%. Inter- and intra-reader reliability for ordinal SQ scoring ranged from 0.21 (inter-reader Hoffa-synovitis) to 1.00 (inter-reader effusion-synovitis). Inter- and intra-observer reliability of SQ 3D-DCE parameters ranged from 0.86 to 0.99.

Conclusions

Seven T FLAIR-FS ultra-high field MRI is a potential non-enhanced imaging method able to visualize synovial inflammation with high conspicuity and holds promise for further application in research endeavors and clinical routine by trained readers.