Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging

How to differentiate between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with rim arterial phase hyperenhancement?

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare the differences in MRI features between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) with arterial phase peripheral enhancement, so as to provide valuable references for preoperative differential diagnosis.

METHODS

Seventy cHCC-CCA patients and 74 iCCA patients confirmed by pathology were included in this study. Their contrast-enhanced MRI showed rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (Rim APHE). The differences of clinicopathological data and MRI features between cHCC-CCA and iCCA were compared. Then, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) were also analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Seventy cHCC-CCA patients (mean age, 55.7 ± 10.6 years) and 74 iCCA patients (mean age, 61.1 ± 10.5 years) were evaluated. In this study, univariable and multivariable regression analysis showed that AFP > 20 ng/ml (OR = 5.824, p = 0.006), enhancing capsule (OR = 7.252, p = 0.001), and mosaic architecture (OR = 32.732, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of cHCC-CCA with Rim APHE. However, only hepatic capsule retraction (OR = 0.091, p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of iCCA. In addition, combining AFP > 20 ng/ml with enhancing capsule (96.7% vs. 79.2%, p < 0.001) and/or mosaic architecture (96.4% vs. 94.7%, p < 0.001) can improve the sensitivity of differentiating cHCC-CCA (vs. iCCA) with Rim APHE.

CONCLUSION

The combination of elevated AFP and MRI features, such as enhancing capsule and mosaic architecture, will help in preoperative differential diagnosis of cHCC-CCA and iCCA with Rim APHE.

MRI features of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare liver tumor which has a more aggressive behavior and worse survival outcome than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a prognosis similar to that of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). With limited literature on the appearance of this tumor on MRI, it remains a diagnostic challenge. In this review, we looked at the currently described MRI findings in this uncommon entity. Based on studies conducted to date, a mixed pattern at imaging has demonstrated the highest specificity, seen as a combination of areas showing progressive enhancement of the lesion, arterial enhancement with washout, and areas of arterial enhancement without washout and/or hypovascularity. Tumor markers may aid in identification, particularly in cases where the imaging appearance mimics that of isolated HCC or iCCA. Intratumoral heterogeneity leads to difficulties with pathologic diagnosis from sampling due to the possibility of an incorrect diagnosis if the biopsy specimen does not contain adequate tissue comprising both histologic components.

Best Practice for MRI Diagnostic Accuracy Research With Lessons and Examples from the LI-RADS Individual Participant Data Group

Medical imaging diagnostic test accuracy research is strengthened by adhering to best practices for study design, data collection, data documentation, and study reporting. In this review, key elements of such research are discussed, and specific recommendations provided for optimizing diagnostic accuracy study execution to improve uniformity, minimize common sources of bias and avoid potential pitfalls. Examples are provided regarding study methodology and data collection practices based on insights gained by the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) individual participant data group, who have evaluated raw data from numerous MRI diagnostic accuracy studies for risk of bias and data integrity. The goal of this review is to outline strategies for investigators to improve research practices, and to help reviewers and readers better contextualize a study's findings while understanding its limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category 5 has high specificity and modest sensitivity for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 vs combined LR-4 and LR-5 (LR-4/5) for HCC diagnosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through January 03, 2023 were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 and combined LR-4/5 for HCC diagnosis, using CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies (15,108 observations, 9928 (65.7%) HCCs) were included. Compared to LR-5, combined LR-4/5 showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (83.0% (95% CI [80.3-85.8%]) vs 65.7% (95% CI [62.4-69.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled specificity (75.0% (95% CI [70.5-79.6%]) vs 91.7% (95% CI [90.2-93.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled positive likelihood ratio (3.60 (95% CI [3.06-4.23]) vs 6.18 (95% CI [5.35-7.14]); p < 0.001), and lower pooled negative likelihood ratio (0.22 (95% CI [0.19-0.25]) vs 0.38 (95% CI [0.35-0.41]) vs; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that combining LR-4 and LR-5 would increase sensitivity but decrease specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. These findings may inform management guidelines and individualized management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This meta-analysis estimated the magnitude of changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria when LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were combined; these findings can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

KEY POINTS

There is no single worldwide reporting system for liver imaging, partly due to regional needs. Combining LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 increased sensitivity and decreased specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

Current advances and future directions in combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

The low incidence of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is an important factor limiting research progression. Our study extensively included nearly three decades of relevant literature and assembled the most comprehensive database comprising 5,742 patients with cHCC-CCA. We summarized the characteristics, tumor markers, and clinical features of these patients. Additionally, we present the evolution of cHCC-CCA classification and explain the underlying rationale for these classification standards. We reviewed cHCC-CCA diagnostic advances using imaging features, tumor markers, and postoperative pathology, as well as treatment options such as surgical, adjuvant, and immune-targeted therapies. In addition, recent advances in more effective chemotherapeutic regimens and immune-targeted therapies were explored. Furthermore, we described the molecular mutation features and potential specific markers of cHCC-CCA. The prognostic value of Nestin has been proven, and we speculate that Nestin will also play a role in classification and diagnosis. However, further research is needed. Moreover, we believe that the possibility of using machine learning liquid biopsy for preoperative diagnosis and establishing a scoring system are directions for future research.

LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Feature Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Malignancy: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

Background The independent contribution of each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT or MRI ancillary feature (AF) has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the association of LI-RADS AFs with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and malignancy while adjusting for LI-RADS major features through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched from January 2014 to January 2022 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for HCC using LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. Using a one-step approach, IPD across studies were pooled. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariable logistic regression models of each AF combined with major features except threshold growth (excluded because of infrequent reporting). Liver observation clustering was addressed at the study and participant levels through random intercepts. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results Twenty studies comprising 3091 observations (2456 adult participants; mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1849 [75.3%] men) were included. In total, 89% (eight of nine) of AFs favoring malignancy were associated with malignancy and/or HCC, 80% (four of five) of AFs favoring HCC were associated with HCC, and 57% (four of seven) of AFs favoring benignity were negatively associated with HCC and/or malignancy. Nonenhancing capsule (OR = 3.50 [95% CI: 1.53, 8.01]) had the strongest association with HCC. Diffusion restriction (OR = 14.45 [95% CI: 9.82, 21.27]) and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR = 10.18 [95% CI: 7.17, 14.44]) had the strongest association with malignancy. The strongest negative associations with HCC were parallels blood pool enhancement (OR = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.49]) and marked T2 hyperintensity (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.45]). Seventeen studies (85%) had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Most LI-RADS AFs were independently associated with HCC, malignancy, or benignity as intended when adjusting for major features. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Crivellaro in this issue.

LI-RADS category is associated with treatment outcomes of small single HCC: surgical resection vs. radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category is associated with the treatment outcomes of small single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 357 patients who underwent SR (n = 209) or RFA (n = 148) for a single HCC of ≤ 3 cm between 2014 and 2016. LI-RADS categories were assigned. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates after treatment were compared according to the LI-RADS category (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors for treatment outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 357 patients (mean age, 59 years; men, 272) with 357 HCCs (294 LR-4/5 and 63 LR-M) were included. After PSM (n = 78 in each treatment group), there were 10 and 11 LR-M HCCs in the SR and RFA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or RFS. However, SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA (1.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.001). SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for LR-M HCCs (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and LR-4/5 HCCs (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

LI-RADS classification is associated with the treatment outcome of HCC, supporting favorable outcomes of SR over RFA for LTP, especially for HCCs categorized as LR-M.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category has a potential prognostic role, supporting favorable outcomes of surgical resection over radiofrequency ablation for local tumor progression, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma categorized as LR-M.

KEY POINTS

• SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for HCCs categorized as LR-M (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and HCCs categorized as LR-4/5 (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). • There is a steeply increased risk of LTP within 1 year after RFA for LR-M HCCs, compared to SR. • The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (HR 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032) in patients with HCC of ≤ 3 cm treated with SR or RFA.

Nomogram based on clinical and preoperative CT features for predicting the early recurrence of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

To establish and validate a multiparameter prediction model for early recurrence after radical resection in patients diagnosed with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study reviewed the clinical characteristics and preoperative CT images of 143 cHCC-CC patients who underwent radical resection from three institutions. A total of 110 patients from institution 1 were randomly divided into training set (n = 78) and testing set (n = 32) in the ratio of 7-3. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to construct a nomogram prediction model in the training set, which was internally and externally validated in the testing set and the validation set (n = 33) from institutions 2 and 3. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration analysis were used to evaluate the model's performance.

RESULTS

The combined model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to the clinical model, the CT model, the pathological model and the clinic-CT model in predicting the early postoperative recurrence. The nomogram based on the combined model included AST, ALP, tumor size, tumor margin, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and MVI (Microvascular invasion). The model had AUCs of 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.96), 0.85 (95% CI 0.70-0.99), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.72-1.00) in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively, indicating high predictive power. DCA showed that the combined model had good clinical value and correction effect.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram incorporating clinical characteristics and preoperative CT features can be utilized to effectively predict the early postoperative recurrence in patients with cHCC-CC.

Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Center Study

Purpose

To explore whether texture features based on magnetic resonance can distinguish diseases combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before operation.

Methods

The clinical baseline data and MRI information of 342 patients with pathologically diagnosed cHCC-CC and HCC in two medical centers were collected. The data were divided into the training set and the test set at a ratio of 7:3. MRI images of tumors were segmented with ITK-SNAP software, and python open-source platform was used for texture analysis. Logistic regression as the base model, mutual information (MI) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were used to select the most favorable features. The clinical, radiomics, and clinic-radiomics model were constructed based on logistic regression. The model's effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index which is the main, and the model results were exported by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results

A total of 23 features were included. Among all models, the arterial phase-based clinic-radiomics model showed the best performance in differentiating cHCC-CC from HCC before an operation, with the AUC of the test set being 0.863 (95% CI: 0.782 to 0.923), the specificity and sensitivity being 0.918 (95% CI: 0.819 to 0.973) and 0.738 (95% CI: 0.580 to 0.861), respectively. SHAP value results showed that the RMS was the most important feature affecting the model.

Conclusion

Clinic-radiomics model based on DCE-MRI may be useful to distinguish cHCC-CC from HCC in a preoperative setting, especially in the arterial phase, and RMS has the greatest impact.

Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer. It is a complex "biphenotypic" tumor type consisting of bipotential hepatic progenitor cells that can differentiate into cholangiocytes subtype and hepatocytes subtype. The prognosis of patients with cHCC-CC is quite poor with its specific and more aggressive nature. Furthermore, there are no definite demographic or clinical features of cHCC-CC, thus a clear preoperative identification and accurate non-invasive imaging diagnostic analysis of cHCC-CC are of great value. In this review, we first summarized the epidemiological features, pathological findings, molecular biological information and serological indicators of cHCC-CC disease. Then we reviewed the important applications of non-invasive imaging modalities-particularly ultrasound (US)-in cHCC-CC, covering both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with cHCC-CC. Finally, we presented the shortcomings and potential outlooks for imaging studies in cHCC-CC.

Targetoid Primary Liver Malignancy in Chronic Liver Disease: Prediction of Postoperative Survival Using Preoperative MRI Findings and Clinical Factors

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess and validate the radiologic and clinical factors that were associated with recurrence and survival after curative surgery for heterogeneous targetoid primary liver malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease and to develop scoring systems for risk stratification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 197 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease who had a single targetoid primary liver malignancy (142 hepatocellular carcinomas, 37 cholangiocarcinomas, 17 combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinomas, and one neuroendocrine carcinoma) identified on preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and subsequently surgically removed between 2010 and 2017. Of these, 120 patients constituted the development cohort, and 77 patients from separate institution served as an external validation cohort. Factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, and risk scores were developed. The discriminatory power of the risk scores in the external validation cohort was evaluated using the Harrell C-index. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate RFS and OS for the different risk-score groups.

RESULTS

In RFS model 1, which eliminated features exclusively accessible on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), tumor size of 2-5 cm or > 5 cm, and thin-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) were included. In RFS model 2, tumors with a size of > 5 cm, tumor in vein (TIV), and HBP hypointense nodules without APHE were included. The OS model included a tumor size of > 5 cm, thin-rim APHE, TIV, and tumor vascular involvement other than TIV. The risk scores of the models showed good discriminatory performance in the external validation set (C-index, 0.62-0.76). The scoring system categorized the patients into three risk groups: favorable, intermediate, and poor, each with a distinct survival outcome (all log-rank p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Risk scores based on rim arterial enhancement pattern, tumor size, HBP findings, and radiologic vascular invasion status may help predict postoperative RFS and OS in patients with targetoid primary liver malignancies.

LI-RADS Category on MRI Is Associated With Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgery: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology and interpretation of liver imaging. The association between the LI-RADS category and tumor recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs) has not yet been evaluated in a multicenter study.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the preoperative clinical and imaging features associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of iCCAs and to identify the role of the LI-RADS category in at-risk patients.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective, multicenter.

SUBJECTS

A total of 113 patients (mean age: 61.1 years; 74 men, 39 women) who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI and curative surgical resection for a single treatment-naive iCCA between 2008 and 2021.

FILED STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3 T dual gradient-echo T₁ WI with in- and opposed-phase, turbo spin-echo T₂ WI, diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and three-dimensional gradient-echo T₁ WI before and after administration of contrast agent.

ASSESSMENT

MR imaging features were evaluated and assigned for each lesion using LI-RADS version 2018. RFS was calculated from the date of surgery to tumor recurrence or the last imaging date without evidence of recurrence. Factors affecting RFS were evaluated using clinical and imaging features.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Cox proportional hazards model, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 93 (82.3%) were categorized as LR-M and 20 (17.7%) were categorized as LR-4 or 5. In the multivariable analysis, LR-M category (hazard ratio [HR], 8.035; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096-58.931) and a tumor size >3 cm on MRI (HR, 2.690; 95% CI, 1.319-5.487) were independent factors for poor RFS. The 5-year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients with iCCA categorized as LR-4 or 5 than in those categorized as LR-M (94.4% vs. 51.9%, respectively).

DATA CONCLUSION

Patients with iCCA categorized as LR-4 or 5 may have a better RFS than those categorized as LR-M.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with a focus on LI-RADS v2018 imaging features predicts the prognosis after radiofrequency ablation in small hepatocellular carcinoma

Introduction

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes to evaluating the prognosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) following treatment. We have investigated the potential role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI based on LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) v2018 imaging features in the prognosis prediction of patients with sHCC treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as the first-line treatment and formulated a predictive nomogram.

Methods

A total of 204 patients with sHCC who all received RFA as the first-line therapy were enrolled. All patients had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI examinations before RFA. Uni- and multivariable analyses for RFS were assessing using a Cox proportional hazards model. A novel nomogram was further constructed for predicting RFS. The clinical capacity of the model was validated according to calibration curves, the concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analyses.

Results

Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) > 100 ng/ml (HR, 2.006; 95% CI, 1.111-3.621; P = 0.021), rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (HR, 2.751; 95% CI, 1.511-5.011; P = 0.001), and targetoid restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (HR, 3.289; 95% CI, 1.832-5.906; P < 0.001) were considered as the independent risk features for recurrence in patients with sHCC treated with RFA. The calibration curves and C-indexes (C-index values of 0.758 and 0.807) showed the superior predictive performance of the integrated nomogram in both the training and validation groups.

Discussion

The gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features based on LI-RADS v2018, including rim APHE, targetoid restriction on DWI, and the AFP level, are the independent risk factors of recurrence in patients with sHCC treated with RFA as the first-line therapy. The predictive clinical-radiological nomogram model was constructed for clinicians to develop individualized treatment and surveillance strategies.

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with a predominant HCC component: better survival and MRI-based prediction

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal cutoff value of HCC% for predicting the outcome of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to investigate how preoperative MR features based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS ver. 2018) are related to the HCC% in cHCC-CCA.

METHODS

The study enrolled 107 patients pathologically confirmed to have single cHCC-CCA according to the 2019 WHO classification. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the optimal cutoff value of HCC% based on overall survival (OS). The preoperative MR imaging features and clinicopathological findings were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the high HCC% and low HCC% groups.

RESULTS

In total, 107 patients (mean age, males vs. females: 56.6 ± 10.7 years vs. 54.2 ± 12.8 years) were evaluated. Analysis of the relationship between HCC% and OS by ROC curve suggested that the optimal cutoff value was 65%, by which 51 (47.7%) patients were assigned to the high HCC% group. LI-RADS categorization (OR = 3.657, p = 0.006 vs. OR = 4.075, p = 0.004) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >5 ng/mL (OR = 0.348, p = 0.089 vs. OR = 0.298, p = 0.040) were significant predictors for HCC% in cHCC-CCA in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

cHCC-CCA patients with HCC components higher than 65% tend to exhibit better overall survival, and MRI-based LI-RADS categorization and serum CEA level are valuable for identifying HCC% in cHCC-CCA preoperatively.

KEY POINTS

• cHCC-CCA patients with HCC components higher than 65% tend to exhibit better overall survival. • MRI-based LI-RADS categorization and serum CEA level were significant predictors for HCC% in cHCC-CCA in both univariate and multivariate analyses and valuable for identifying HCC% in cHCC-CCA preoperatively.

Quantitative Assessment of Hypovascular Component in Arterial Phase to Help the Discrimination of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To explore the imaging performance for discrimination of combined hepatocellular- cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

In total, 35 patients with cHCC-CCA and a matched control group of HCC patients (n = 35) were included retrospectively. We quantitatively evaluated the hypovascular component in tumor and qualitatively assessed LI-RADS features and other aggressive features to develop model for cHCC-CCA diagnose. Subgroup analyses were performed by tumor size and LI-RADS category.

Results

cHCC-CCA frequently showed a larger proportion (≥50%) of hypovascular areas followed by HCC (P = 0.000). Among those patients with ≥50% hypovascular areas, 8 patients did not present rim enhancement in atrial phase. The LI-RADS major features were more commonly observed in HCC (82.9-45.7%,), than cHCC-CCA (P = 0.003-0.022). The targetoid appearances and non-smooth margin frequently appeared in cHCC-CCA (34.3-63.9%), compared with HCC (P = 0.000-0.023). We developed a radiologic model based on ≥50% hypovascular component and delayed enhancement, which presented AUC of 0.821, accuracy of 80%. We also obtained good performance by radiologic model in LR-M group and tumor size <50mm group (AUC: 0.841 and 0.866, respectively). Combined group which included CA 19-9 and ≥50% hypovascular component and delayed enhancement did not improve the distinction performance between cHCC-CCA and HCC, which presented good performance of identifying cHCC-CCA in the LR-4/5 subgroup and tumor size ≥50 mm subgroup (AUC: 0.717, 0.730, respectively). cHCC-CCA group presented heterogeneous dominant pathology involving 15 of HCC, 7 of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) or cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CLC), 13 of intermediate cells component. Macrotrabecular appearances were higher in cHCC-CCA than that in HCC. The proportion of Hepa-1 was significantly higher in true negative (TN) patients (29 [93.5%]) and false negative (FN) patients (10 [100%]) than in true positive (TP) patients (16 [64%]; P = 0.036).

Conclusion

Quantitative assessment of hypovascular component could help the discrimination of cHCC-CCA. Macrotrabecular appearances were more exhibited in cHCC-CCA than that in HCC.

Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT and MRI algorithm applies equally to CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI). Purpose To estimate pooled percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy for each LI-RADS category with CT and MRI. Materials and Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for research articles (January 2014-April 2021) reporting the percentages of observations in each LI-RADS category with use of versions 2014, 2017, or 2018. Study design, population characteristics, imaging modality, reference standard, and numbers of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in each category were recorded. A random-effects model evaluated the pooled percentage of HCC and overall malignancy for each category. Results There were 49 studies with 9620 patients and a total 11 562 observations, comprising 7921 HCCs, 1132 non-HCC malignancies, and 2509 benign entities. No HCC or non-HCC malignancies were reported with any modality in the LR-1 category. The pooled percentages of HCC for CT, ECA-MRI, and Gx-MRI, respectively, were 10%, 6%, and 1% for LR-2 (P = .16); 48%, 31%, and 38% for LR-3 (P = .42); 76%, 64%, and 77% for LR-4 (P = .62); 96%, 95%, and 96% for LR-5 (P = .76); 88%, 76%, and 78% for LR-5V or LR-TIV (tumor in vein) (P = .42); and 20%, 30%, and 35% for LR-M (P = .32). Most LR-M (93%-100%) and LR-5V or LR-TIV (99%-100%) observations were malignant, regardless of modality. Conclusion There was no difference in percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma and overall malignancy between CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents, and MRI with gadoxetate for any Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categories. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Ronot in this issue.

[CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS): Standardization, Evidence, and Future Direction]

The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) has been developed with the support of the American College of Radiology to standardize the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 has been incorporated in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidance. This review examines the effect of CT/MRI LI-RADS on the standardized reporting of liver imaging, and the evidence in diagnosing HCC and evaluating treatment response after locoregional treatment using CT/MRI LI-RADS. The results are compared with other HCC diagnosis guidelines, and future directions are described.

Predictive machine learning model for microvascular invasion identification in hepatocellular carcinoma based on the LI-RADS system

Purposes

This study aimed to establish a predictive model of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), which relied on a combination of machine learning approach and imaging features covering Liver Imaging and Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) features.

Methods

The retrospective study included 279 patients with surgery who underwent preoperative enhanced CT. They were randomly allocated to training set, validation set, and test set (167 patients vs. 56 patients vs. 56 patients, respectively). Significant imaging findings for predicting MVI were identified through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression method. Predictive models were performed by machine learning algorithm, support vector machine (SVM), in the training set and validation set, and evaluated in the test set. Further, a combined model adding clinical findings to the radiologic model was developed. Based on the LI-RADS category, subgroup analyses were conducted.

Results

We included 116 patients with MVI which were diagnosed through pathological confirmation. Six imaging features were selected about MVI prediction: four LI-RADS features (corona enhancement, enhancing capsule, non-rim aterial phase hyperehancement, tumor size) and two non-LI-RADS features (internal arteries, non-smooth tumor margin). The radiological feature with the best accuracy was corona enhancement followed by internal arteries and tumor size. The accuracies of the radiological model and combined model were 0.725–0.714 and 0.802–0.732 in the training set, validation set, and test set, respectively. In the LR-4/5 subgroup, a sensitivity of 100% and an NPV of 100% were obtained by the high-sensitivity threshold. A specificity of 100% and a PPV of 100% were acquired through the high specificity threshold in the LR-M subgroup.

Conclusion

A combination of LI-RADS features and non-LI-RADS features and serum alpha-fetoprotein value could be applied as a preoperative biomarker for predicting MVI by the machine learning approach. Furthermore, its good performance in the subgroup by LI-RADS category may help optimize the management of HCC patients.

Histopathological components correlated with MRI features and prognosis in combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To distinguish MR features according to different proportions of the histopathological hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) component and to investigate whether the proportion of the HCC component can predict the prognosis of patients with cHCC-CCA.

METHODS

The study enrolled 106 cHCC-CCA patients confirmed by histopathology. The MR imaging features and clinicopathological findings were retrospectively evaluated and compared between two subgroups with different proportions of the HCC component. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. Moreover, whether the proportion of the HCC component was a predictor of RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category 4/5 was more prevalent in cHCC-CCAs with an HCC component > 50% (odds ratio (OR) = 5.559, p = 0.018), 70% (OR = 4.031, p = 0.008), and 90% (OR = 6.282, p = 0.012) than in those with an HCC component ≤ 50%, 70%, and 90%, respectively. In addition, cHCC-CCAs with an HCC component > 70% (HR: 0.241, p = 0.023) had a better OS prognosis than those with an HCC component ≤ 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

cHCC-CCAs categorized as LR-4/5 are mainly composed of HCC component, and cHCC-CCAs with an HCC component > 70% are associated with better OS than those with an HCC component ≤ 70%. These findings suggest that the proportion of HCC or CCA component can predict the prognosis of cHCC-CCA patients.

KEY POINTS

• cHCC-CCAs categorized as LR-4/5 are mainly composed of HCC component. • cHCC-CCAs with an HCC component > 70% are associated with better OS than those with an HCC component ≤ 70%.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Based Nomogram: A Potential Predictor of Individually Postoperative Early Recurrence for Patients With Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSES

To evaluate the postsurgical prognostic implication of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC). To build a CEUS-based early recurrence prediction classifier for CHC, in comparison with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging.

METHODS

The CEUS features and clinicopathological findings of each case were analyzed, and the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categories were assigned. The recurrence-free survival associated factors were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model. Incorporating the independent factors, nomograms were built to estimate the possibilities of 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year recurrence and whose prognostic value was determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics, calibration curves, and hazard layering efficiency validation, comparing with TNM staging system.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, the levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9, prothrombin time and total bilirubin, and tumor shape, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category were independent factors for recurrence-free survival. The LR-M category showed longer recurrence-free survival than did the LR-4/5 category. The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year area under the curves of the CEUS-clinical nomogram, clinical nomogram, and TNM staging system were 0.518, 0.552, and 0.843 versus 0.354, 0.240, and 0.624 (P = .048, .049, and .471) vs. 0.562, 0.545, and 0.843 (P = .630, .564, and .007), respectively. The calibration curves of the CEUS-clinical model at different prediction time pionts were all close to the ideal line. The CEUS-clinical model effectively stratified patients into groups of high and low risk of recurrence in both training and validation set, while the TNM staging system only works on the training set.

CONCLUSIONS

Our CEUS-clinical nomogram is a reliable early recurrence prediction tool for hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and helps postoperative risk stratification.

Etiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Practical Implications of Hepatocellular Neoplasms

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a major global contributor of cancer death, usually arises in a background of chronic liver disease, as a result of molecular changes that deregulate important signal transduction pathways. Recent studies have shown that certain molecular changes of hepatocarcinogenesis are associated with clinicopathologic features and prognosis, suggesting that subclassification of HCC is practically useful. On the other hand, subclassification of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), a heterogenous group of neoplasms, has been well established on the basis of genotype–phenotype correlations. Histologic examination, aided by immunohistochemistry, is the gold standard for the diagnosis and subclassification of HCA and HCC, while clinicopathologic correlation is essential for best patient management. Advances in clinico-radio-pathologic correlation have introduced a new approach for the diagnostic assessment of lesions arising in advanced chronic liver disease by imaging (LI-RADS). The rapid expansion of knowledge concerning the molecular pathogenesis of HCC is now starting to produce new therapeutic approaches through precision oncology. This review summarizes the etiology and pathogenesis of HCA and HCC, provides practical information for their histologic diagnosis (including an algorithmic approach), and addresses a variety of frequently asked questions regarding the diagnosis and practical implications of these neoplasms.

Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Pre-operative Clinical Data and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Characteristics

The goal of the study described here was to define the predictive value of pre-operative clinical information and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging characteristics in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI). Seventy-six patients with pathologically confirmed CHC were enrolled in this study, comprising 18 patients with MVI-positive status and 58 with MVI-negative CHC nodules. The pre-operative clinical data and CEUS imaging features were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the potential predictors of MVI in CHC. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy was compared between patients with different MVI status using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Univariate analysis indicated that the following parameters of patients with CHC significantly differed between the MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups (p<0.05): tumor size, α-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL, enhancement patterns in arterial phase and marked washout during the portal venous phase on CEUS. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the CEUS characteristics of heterogeneous enhancement (odds ratio = 6.807; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.099, 42.147; p = 0.039) and marked washout (odds ratio = 4.380; 95% CI: 1.050,18.270; p = 0.043) were identified as independent predictors of MVI in CHC. The combination of the two risk factors in predicting MVI achieved a better diagnostic performance than each parameter alone, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.736 (0.622, 0.830). After hepatectomy, CHC patients with MVI exhibited earlier recurrence compared with those without MVI (hazard ratio = 1.859; 95% CI: 0.8699-3.9722, p = 0.046). The CEUS imaging features of heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase and marked washout during the portal venous phase were the potential predictors of MVI in CHC. Aside from that, CHC patients with MVI had an earlier recurrence rate than those without MVI after surgery.

Atypical Manifestation of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Malignancy Mimicking Lesions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively on multiphasic CT and MRI based on its distinctive imaging findings. These features include arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, radiologists face significant diagnostic challenges because some HCCs exhibit atypical imaging characteristics. In addition to many HCC-mimicking lesions, such as arterioportal shunts, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hemangioma present a challenge for radiologists in actual clinical practice. The ability to distinguish HCCs from mimickers on initial imaging examinations is crucial for appropriate management and treatment decisions. Therefore, this pictorial review presents the imaging findings of atypical HCCs and HCCs mimicking malignant and benign lesions and discusses important clues that may help narrow down the differential diagnosis.

CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS in Association With Serum Biomarkers for Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Combined Hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCAs) are with both unambiguously differentiated hepatocellular and biliary components. cHCC-CCAs show various imaging features similar to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCs), which makes the differential diagnosis between them challenging. The accurate diagnosis of cHCC-CCAs is of great importance in selecting treatment methods and performing patient management.

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS in association with tumor biomarkers for differentiation of cHCC-CCAs from HCCs.

Methods

A total of 54 cHCC-CCAs and 55 HCCs in two centers were retrospectively collected. The diagnostic criteria for cHCC-CCAs if one or more of the following conditions were satisfied: (1) arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) on CEUS and LR-M on CT/MRI; (2) LR-5 on both CEUS and CT/MRI with elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); (3) LR-M on both CEUS and CT/MRI with elevated alphafetoprotein (AFP). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results

The rates of APHE and Rim-APHE on CEUS in cHCC-CCAs were 81.5% and 9.3%, respectively. The rate of early and marked washout on CEUS in cHCC-CCAs were 59.3% and 27.8%, respectively. 64.8% and 25.9% of cHCC-CCAs showed APHE and Rim-APHE on CT/MRI, respectively. 46.3% and 35.2% of cHCC-CCAs showed washout and delay enhancement on CT/MRI, respectively. The kappa value of LI-RADS categories of cHCC-CCAs on CEUS and CT/MRI was 0.319 (P=0.008). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of the aforementioned diagnostic criteria for cHCC-CCAs were 64.8%, 84.4%, 76.1% and 0.746, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of the CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS with serum tumor markers shows promising diagnostic performance of cHCC-CCAs.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound manifestations of synchronous combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Synchronous combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is very rare, with few literature reports and poor clinical outcomes associated with the disorder. Surgical resection is the main treatment, which makes the preoperative diagnosis very important. However, due to imaging manifestations overlapping with HCC, diagnosis of this type of synchronous cancer is challenging and it tends to be misdiagnosed as multiple HCC. Herein, we report the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) manifestations of a case of synchronous CHC and HCC, aiming at adding to the understanding of this disease. CEUS displayed exquisite vascularity and tissue perfusion in real time with good spatial and temporal resolution and more accurately reflect tumor washin and washout times than contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in this case.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient was a 69-year-old female with a 20-year history of chronic hepatitis B. Due to months of epigastric pain and anorexia, she reffered to our hospital for treatment. Five days before hospitalization, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging performed at another hospital detected a space-occupying lesion in the liver. After her hospitalization, laboratory tests showed elevated alpha-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level. Two suspicious liver lesions located in S4 and S6, respectively, were identified in a cirrhotic background by abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Furthermore, the lesion in S4 and S6 were detected by CEUS and assigned to CEUS LI-RADS 5 and M categories, respectively. The patient underwent tumor radical resections. Post-operative pathology confirmed the S4 and S6 lesions to be HCC and CHC, respectively. A newly-found suspicious liver nodule with potential malignancy was detected in liver S1 by both CEUS and CECT 7 mo after operation.

CONCLUSION

The CEUS characteristics of CHC and HCC are different. CEUS features in combination with clinical information could help in effective diagnosis, clinical decision-making and better prognosis.

Risk stratification of LI-RADS M and LI-RADS 4/5 combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic values of MR imaging features and clinicopathological factors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of clinicopathological factors and MR imaging factors in risk stratification of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients who were classified as LR-M and LR-4/5.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified consecutive patients who were confirmed as cHCC-CCA after surgical surgery in our institution from June 2015 to November 2020. Two radiologists evaluated the preoperative MR imaging features independently, and each lesion was assigned with a LI-RADS category. Preoperative clinical data were also collected. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was applied to separately identify the independent factors correlated with the recurrence of cHCC-CCAs in LR-M and LR-4/5. Risk stratifications were conducted separately in LR-M and LR-4/5. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients with single primary lesion which met the 2019 WHO classification criteria were finally included. Corona enhancement, delayed central enhancement, and microvascular invasion (MVI) were identified as predictors of RFS in LR-M. Mosaic architecture, CA19-9, and MVI were independently associated with RFS in LR-4/5. Based on the number of these independent predictors, patients were stratified into favorable-outcome groups (LR-ML subgroup and LR-4/5L subgroup) and dismal-outcome groups (LR-MH subgroup and LR-4/5H subgroup). The corresponding median RFS for LR-ML, LR-MH, LR-5L, and LR-5H were 25.6 months, 8.2 months, 51.7 months, and 18.1 months.

CONCLUSION

Our study explored the prognostic values of imaging and clinicopathological factors for LR-M and LR-4/5 cHCC-CCA patients, and different survival outcomes were observed among four subgroups after conducting risk stratifications.

KEY POINTS

• Corona enhancement, delayed central enhancement, and MVI were identified as predictors of RFS in cHCC-CCAs which were classified into LR-M. Mosaic architecture, CA19-9, and MVI were independently associated with RFS in cHCC-CCAs which were classified into LR-4/5. • Based on the identified risk factors, LR-M and LR-4/5 cHCC-CCA patients could be stratified into two subgroups respectively, with significantly different RFS and OS. • cHCC-CCA patients from LR-M did not always have worse RFS and OS than those from LR-4/5 in some cases.

Preoperative Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Nomogram Based on Ultrasonographic Features and Clinical Indicators

OBJECTIVE

To establish a predictive nomogram to distinguish combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) based on preoperative clinical and ultrasound findings.

METHODS

A total of 261 patients with pathologically confirmed primary liver cancers (PLCs) were enrolled in this retrospective study, comprising 87 CHCs, 87 HCCs, and 87 ICCs matched by propensity score matching. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation one at the ratio of 7:3. A nomogram integrating ultrasound imaging characteristics and clinical features was established based on the independent risk factors selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated in the training and validation cohorts in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The nomogram, consisting of ultrasound imaging features (shape and margin on B-mode ultrasound, enhanced pattern on contrast-enhanced ultrasound) and clinical information [elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level and serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) α1 level], showed promising performance in differentiating CHC from HCC and ICC, with the concordance index (C-index) of 0.8275 and 0.8530 in the training cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the calibration curves suggested good consistency between predictions and observations. High clinical practicability was confirmed by the decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on clinical and ultrasound imaging characteristics showed good performance in the discrimination of CHC from other subtypes of PLC and would be valuable in clinical decision-making.

Differentiation between combined hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic performance between ultrasomics-based model and CEUS LI-RADS v2017

Background

The imaging findings of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) may be similar to those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CEUS LI-RADS may not perform well in distinguishing CHC from HCC. Studies have shown that radiomics has an excellent imaging analysis ability. This study aimed to establish and confirm an ultrasomics model for differentiating CHC from HCC.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2016, we retrospectively identified 53 eligible CHC patients and randomly included 106 eligible HCC patients with a ratio of HCC:CHC = 2:1, all of whom were categorized according to Contrast-Enhanced (CE) ultrasonography (US) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017. The model based on ultrasomics features of CE US was developed in 74 HCC and 37 CHC and confirmed in 32 HCC and 16 CHC. The diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS or ultrasomics model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

Results

In the entire and validation cohorts, 67.0% and 81.3% of HCC cases were correctly assigned to LR-5 or LR-TIV contiguous with LR-5, and 73.6% and 87.5% of CHC cases were assigned to LR-M correctly. Up to 33.0% of HCC and 26.4% of CHC were misclassified by CE US LI-RADS. A total of 90.6% of HCC as well as 87.5% of CHC correctly diagnosed by the ultrasomics model in the validation cohort. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity of the ultrasomics model were higher though without significant difference than those of CE US LI-RADS in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

The proposed ultrasomics model showed higher ability though the difference was not significantly different for differentiating CHC from HCC, which may be helpful in clinical diagnosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00765-x.

Development and validation of nomogram to predict very early recurrence of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic resection: a multi-institutional study

Background and objectives

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC) has a high incidence of early recurrence. The objective of this study is to construct a model predicting very early recurrence (VER) (i.e., recurrence within 6 months after surgery) of cHCC.

Methods

One hundred thirty-one consecutive patients from Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital served as a development cohort to construct a nomogram predicting VER by using multi-variable logistic regression analysis. The model was internally and externally validated in a validation cohort of 90 patients from Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital using the C concordance statistic, calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The VER nomogram contains microvascular invasion (MiVI), macrovascular invasion (MaVI), and CA19-9 > 25 mAU/mL. The model shows good discrimination with C-indexes of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69–0.85) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66–0.86) in the development cohort and validation cohort respectively. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model is clinically useful and the calibration of our model was favorable. Our model stratified patients into two different risk groups, which exhibited significantly different VER.

Conclusions

Our model demonstrated favorable performance in predicting VER in cHCC patients.

CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) assigns a risk category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to imaging observations. Establishing the contributions of major features can inform the diagnostic algorithm. Purpose To perform a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to establish the probability of HCC for each LI-RADS major feature using CT/MRI and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) LI-RADS in patients at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods Multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 2014 to September 2019 that evaluated the accuracy of CT, MRI, and CEUS for HCC detection using LI-RADS (CT/MRI LI-RADS, versions 2014, 2017, and 2018; CEUS LI-RADS, versions 2016 and 2017). Data were centralized. Clustering was addressed at the study and patient levels using mixed models. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were determined for each major feature using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020164486). Results A total of 32 studies were included, with 1170 CT observations, 3341 MRI observations, and 853 CEUS observations. At multivariable analysis of CT/MRI LI-RADS, all major features were associated with HCC, except threshold growth (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 3.6; P = .07). Nonperipheral washout (OR, 13.2; 95% CI: 9.0, 19.2; P = .01) and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR, 10.3; 95% CI: 6.7, 15.6; P = .01) had stronger associations with HCC than enhancing capsule (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.5; P = .03). On CEUS images, APHE (OR, 7.3; 95% CI: 4.6, 11.5; P = .01), late and mild washout (OR, 4.1; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6; P = .01), and size of at least 20 mm (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.5; P = .04) were associated with HCC. Twenty-five studies (78%) had high risk of bias due to reporting ambiguity or study design flaws. Conclusion Most Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System major features had different independent associations with hepatocellular carcinoma; for CT/MRI, arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout had the strongest associations, whereas threshold growth had no association. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

EASL versus LI-RADS: Intra-individual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast and gadoxetic acid for diagnosis of small HCC

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and European Association for the Study (EASL) criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis have been updated in 2018. We aimed to compare the HCC diagnostic performance of LI-RADS and EASL criteria with extracellular contrast agents-MRI (ECA-MRI) and hepatobiliary agents-MRI (HBA-MRI).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 179 participants with cirrhosis (n = 105) or non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (n = 74) who underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo nodule(s) measuring 10-30 mm. We compared the HCC diagnostic performance of EASL and LR-5 in both MRIs.

RESULTS

In an analysis of 215 observations (175 HCCs, 17 non-HCC malignancies and 23 benign lesions) identified from cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CHB participants, LR-5 with ECA-MRI provided the highest sensitivity (80.7%), followed by EASL with ECA-MRI (76.2%), LR-5 with HBA-MRI (67.3%) and EASL with HBA-MRI (63.0%, all P < .05). The specificities were comparable (89.4%-91.5%). When the analysis is limited to participants with pathological cirrhosis (123 observations), the sensitivity of LR-5 with ECA-MRI was similar to that of EASL with ECA-MRI (82.7% vs 80.2%, P = .156), but higher than LR-5 with HBA-MRI (65.1%) or EASL with HBA-MRI (62.8%, both P < .001), with comparable specificities (87.5%-91.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The LR-5 with ECA-MRI yielded the highest sensitivity with a similar specificity for HCC diagnosis in cirrhosis and non-cirrhotic CHB participants, while the sensitivities of LR-5 and EASL with ECA-MRI are similar for cirrhosis participants. This indicates non-invasive diagnosis criteria can differ by contrast agents and presence of cirrhosis.

MRI-based radiomics distinguish different pathological types of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECT

To distinguish combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) before operation using MRI radiomics.

METHOD

This study retrospectively analyzed 196 liver cancers: 33 cHCC-CC, 88 HCC and 75 CC. They had confirmed by pathological analysis in the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University. MRI lesions were manually segmented by a radiologist.1316 features were extracted from MRI lesions by Pyradiomics. Useful features were retained through two-level feature selection to establish a classification model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under curve (AUC) and F1-score were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

Compared with low-order image features, the performance of the model based on high-order features was improved by about 10%. The model showed better performance in identifying HCC tumors during the delay phase (AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.89, accuracy = 0.89, F1-Score = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

The classification ability of cHCC-CC, HCC and CC can be further improved by extracting MRI high-order features and using a two-level feature selection method.

A multidimensional nomogram combining imaging features and clinical factors to predict the invasiveness and metastasis of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHCC-CCA) is a rare type of primary liver cancer having aggressive behavior. Few studies have investigated the prognostic factors of CHCC-CCA. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a nomogram to evaluate the risk of microvascular invasion (MVI) and the presence of satellite nodules and lymph node metastasis (LNM), which are associated with prognosis.

Methods

One hundred and seventy-one patients pathologically diagnosed with CHCC-CCA were divided into a training set (n=116) and validation set (n=55). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relative value of clinical factors associated with the presence of MVI and satellite nodules. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to establish the imaging model of all outcomes, and to build clinical model of LNM. Nomograms were constructed by incorporating clinical risk factors and imaging features. The model performance was evaluated on the training and validation sets to determine its discrimination ability, calibration, and clinical utility. Kaplan Meier analysis and time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were displayed to evaluate the prognosis value of the predicted nomograms of MVI and satellite nodule.

Results

A nomogram comprising the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and imaging model was established for the prediction of MVI. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and size were combined with the imaging model to establish a nomogram for the prediction of the presence of satellite nodules. Favorable calibration and discrimination were observed in the training and validation sets for the MVI nomogram (C-indexes of 0.857 and 0.795), the nomogram for predicting satellite nodules (C-indexes of 0.919 and 0.883) and the LNM nomogram (C-indexes of 0.872 and 0.666). Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed the clinical utility of the nomograms. The preoperatively predicted MVI and satellite nodules by the combined nomograms achieved satisfactory performance in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) prediction.

Conclusions

The proposed nomograms incorporating clinical risk factors and imaging features achieved satisfactory performance for individualized preoperative predictions of MVI, the presence of satellite nodules, and LNM. The prediction models were demonstrated to be good indicator for predicting the prognosis of CHCC-CCA, facilitating treatment strategy optimization for patients with CHCC-CCA.

Role of noninvasive imaging in the evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: from diagnosis and prognosis to treatment response

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common liver cancer. Desmoplastic stroma may be revealed as distinctive histopathologic findings favoring intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Meanwhile, a range of imaging manifestations is often accompanied with rich desmoplastic stroma in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which can indicate large bile duct ICC, and a higher level of cancer-associated fibroblasts with poor prognosis and weak treatment response.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive review of current state-of-the-art and recent advances in the imaging evaluation for diagnosis, staging, prognosis and treatment response of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, we discuss precursor lesions, cells of origin, molecular mutation, which would cause the different histological classification. Moreover, histological classification and tumor microenvironment, which are related to the proportion of desmoplastic stroma with many imaging manifestations, would be also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may be revealed as the presence and the proportion of desmoplastic stroma with a range of imaging manifestations. With the utility of radiomics and artificial intelligence, imaging is helpful for ICC evaluation. Multicentre, large-scale, prospective studies with external validation are in need to develop comprehensive prediction models based on clinical data, imaging findings, genetic parameters, molecular, metabolic, and immune biomarkers.

LI-RADS Tumor in Vein at CT and Hepatobiliary MRI

Background Diagnostic performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System tumor in vein (LR-TIV) category at CT and/or MRI has not yet been evaluated, to the knowledge of the authors. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of the LR-TIV category in detecting macroscopic tumors in veins (TIVs) at CT and hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced (HBA) MRI, with pathologic results used as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Between January 2010 and December 2019, consecutive patients with or without macroscopic TIV who underwent both CT and HBA MRI before hepatic resection or liver transplant were retrospectively included. Three radiologists independently assessed the LR-TIV features of enhancing soft tissue in vein and features suggestive of TIV (FSTIV) and reached a consensus. Macroscopic TIV at pathologic examination was the reference standard. Sensitivities and specificities of the LR-TIV category without and with FSTIV were calculated, and the added value of FSTIV was evaluated by using the McNemar test. Results In the 1322 patients with (n = 101) or without (n = 1221) macroscopic TIV (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 58-70 years]; 1053 men), without consideration of FSTIV, the sensitivity and specificity of enhancing soft tissue in vein for detecting macroscopic TIV at pathologic examination were 64.4% (65 of 101) and 99.8% (1218 of 1221) with CT and 62.4% (63 of 101) and 99.8% (1218 of 1221) with HBA MRI, respectively. With consideration of FSTIV, the sensitivity and specificity of the LR-TIV category became 67.3% (68 of 101 patients) and 99.7% (1217 of 1221 patients) at both CT and HBA MRI. No difference was found between measurements without and with FSTIV (sensitivity, 62% vs 67% for CT [P = .45] and 64% vs 67% for HBA MRI [P = .18]; specificity, 99% for both CT and HBA MRI [P > .99 for both]). Conclusion The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System tumor in vein category showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity in the detection of macroscopic tumors in veins at both CT and hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced MRI, with pathologic examination used as the reference standard. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Morrell in this issue.

MR Features Based on LI-RADS Ver. 2018 Correlated with Cytokeratin 19 Expression in Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose

To investigate the significance of MR features based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS ver. 2018) for identifying the expression of cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) before surgery.

Patients and Methods

The study enrolled 174 patients pathologically confirmed to have cHCC-CCA according to the 2019 WHO classification. The preoperative MR imaging features and clinicopathological findings were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the CK-19-positive and CK-19-negative cHCC-CCA groups.

Results

One hundred seventy-four patients (mean age, males vs females: 56.6 ± 10.0 years vs 54.7 ± 14.2 years) were evaluated. The presence of mosaic architecture, targetoid appearance, cholangiectasis, hepatic capsule retraction, and corona enhancement was significantly higher in the CK-19-positive group (all p < 0.05), while nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was more common in the CK-19-negative group (p = 0.04). The univariate analysis showed that hepatitis B virus infection, CEA > 5 ng/mL, tumor size, nonrim APHE, mosaic architecture, targetoid appearance, cholangiectasis, hepatic capsule retraction, and corona enhancement were significant risk factors for CK-19-positive cHCC-CCA (all p < 0.05). Unfortunately, the multivariate analysis revealed that only corona enhancement (OR = 2.359, p = 0.03) was an independent risk factor associated with CK-19-positive cHCC-CCA.

Conclusion

Corona enhancement is significantly correlated with CK-19 positivity in patients with cHCC-CCA.

A modified LI-RADS: targetoid tumors with enhancing capsule can be diagnosed as HCC instead of LR-M lesions

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate whether the presence of enhancing capsule can be applied to establish a modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC malignancies in extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced and hepatobiliary agent (HBA)-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

We enrolled 198 participants (161 men; mean age, 56.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo hepatic nodule(s). Two reviewers assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018). We defined a "modified LR-5 category, which emphasizes enhancing capsule (mLR-5C)" over targetoid features and classifies tumors with both targetoid appearance and enhancing capsule as HCC instead of LR-M. We compared the diagnostic performance of conventional LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS criteria for both MRIs.

RESULTS

A total of 258 hepatic nodules (194 HCCs, 43 benign lesions, and 21 non-HCC malignancies; median size, 19 mm) were analyzed. By conventional LI-RADS, 47 (18.2%) nodules (31 HCCs and 16 non-HCC malignancies) were categorized as LR-M. The mLR-5C criterion showed superior sensitivity (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%; both p < 0.05) while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05) compared with the LR-5 criterion. Using the mLR-5C criterion, ECA-MRI exhibited higher sensitivity than HBA-MRI (76.6% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001) and similar specificity (93.8% vs. 95.3%, p > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Our modified LI-RADS achieved superior sensitivity for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity compared with LR-5. ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC than HBA-MRI by applying the mLR-5C for LR-M lesions.

KEY POINTS

• By conventional LI-RADS, 31 (16.0%) of 194 HCCs were categorized as LR-M. • Among 31 HCCs categorized as LR-M, 19 HCCs or 8 HCCs were recategorized as HCC on ECA-MRI or HBA-MRI, respectively, after applying the modified LR-5 category, which allocates targetoid lesions with enhancing capsule as mLR-5C instead of LR-M. • The mLR-5C showed superior sensitivity compared with the LR-5 in both MRIs (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%, both p < 0.05), while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05).

MR Imaging Contrast Agents: Role in Imaging of Chronic Liver Diseases

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of patients with chronic liver disease, particularly for detection and characterization of liver lesions. The two most commonly used contrast agents for liver MR imaging are extracellular agents (ECAs) and hepatobiliary agents (HBAs). In patients with liver disease, the main advantage of ECA-enhanced MR imaging is its high specificity for the diagnosis of progressed HCCs. Conversely, HBAs have an additional contrast mechanism, which results in high liver-to-lesion contrast and highest sensitivity for lesion detection in the hepatobiliary phase. Emerging data suggest that features depicted on contrast-enhanced MR imaging scans are related to tumor biology and are predictive of patients' prognosis, likely to further expand the role of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the clinical care of patients with chronic liver disease.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nonhepatocellular Malignancies in Chronic Liver Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy associated with chronic liver disease. Nonhepatocellular malignancies may also arise in the setting of chronic liver disease. The imaging diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies may be challenging. Non-HCC malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease most commonly include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and less commonly hepatic lymphomas and metastases. On MR imaging, non-HCC malignancies often demonstrate a targetoid appearance, manifesting as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, central delayed enhancement, and peripheral restricted diffusion. When applying the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithm, observations with targetoid appearance are categorized as LR-M.

Prognosis after Curative Resection of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma with A Focus on LI-RADS Targetoid Appearance on Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic implications of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a focus on those with targetoid appearance based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), as well as known microvascular invasion (MVI) features.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 242 patients (190 male; mean age, 57.1 years) who underwent surgical resection of a single HCC (≤ 5 cm) as well as preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between January 2012 and March 2015. LI-RADS category was assigned, and the LR-M category was further classified into two groups according to rim arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE). The imaging features associated with MVI were also assessed. The overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and their associated factors were evaluated.

Results

Among the 242 HCCs, 190 (78.5%), 25 (10.3%), and 27 (11.2%) were classified as LR-4/5, LR-M with rim APHE, and LR-M without rim APHE, respectively. LR-M with rim APHE (vs. LR-4/5; hazard ratio [HR] for OS, 5.48 [p = 0.002]; HR for RFS, 2.09 [p = 0.042]) and tumor size (per cm increase; HR for OS, 6.04 [p = 0.009]; HR for RFS, 1.77 [p = 0.014]) but not MVI imaging features (p > 0.05) were independent factors associated with OS and RFS. Compared to the 5-year OS and RFS rates in the LR-4/5 group (93.9% and 66.8%, respectively), the LR-M with rim APHE group had significantly lower rates (68.0% and 45.8%, respectively, both p < 0.05), while the LR-M without rim APHE group did not significantly differ in the survival rates (91.3% and 80.2%, respectively, both p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Further classification of LR-M according to the presence of rim APHE may help predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with a single HCC.

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma: MRI features correlated with tumor biomarkers and prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To determine how MRI features are correlated to biomarkers, and to the prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients.

METHODS

The study enrolled 160 cHCC-CCA patients pathologically confirmed according to the 2019 WHO classification. The preoperative MRI features and clinical data were retrospectively evaluated and compared between patients grouped by AFP or CA19-9 level and with pathological findings. The RFS and OS of cHCC-CCA patients were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. Moreover, predictors of RFS and OS were investigated using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients (mean age, males vs. females: 55.7 ± 10.2 years vs. 54.9 ± 14.0 years) were evaluated. The incidence of nodule-in-nodule architecture, mosaic architecture, intratumoral hemorrhage, hepatic capsule retraction, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and portal vein thrombus was significantly higher in patients with AFP > 20 ng/ml (all p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age (HR 1.031, p = 0.03), CA19-9 > 37 U/ml (HR 1.880, p = 0.04), arterial phase peritumoral enhancement (HR 2.287, p = 0.01), and delayed enhancement (HR 0.377, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of poor RFS, while arterial phase peripheral enhancement (HR 2.391, p = 0.04) was an independent predictor of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

cHCC-CCA imaging features are complex and not correlated with AFP or CA19-9. Age, CA19-9 > 37 U/ml, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and delayed enhancement are independent predictors of poor RFS. Arterial phase peripheral enhancement is an independent predictor of poor OS.

KEY POINTS

• The imaging features of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma are complex and are not correlated with the alpha fetoprotein or CA19-9 levels. • Age, CA19-9 > 37 U/ml, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, and delayed enhancement are independent predictors of poor recurrence-free survival in combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma patients. • Arterial phase peripheral enhancement is an independent predictor of poor overall survival in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma.

Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk patients matched to MR field strength: diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018

PURPOSE

To eliminate the effects of field strength in determining the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS version 2018 (LI-RADS v2018) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver malignancy in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Patients who were pathologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with HCC were matched to the iCCA or cHCC-CCA patients on age, tumor size, MR scanner, and number of tumors. Two readers independently evaluated the lesions according to LI-RADS v2018. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018 in differentiating HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients with 204 lesions (102 HCCs, 78 iCCAs, and 24 cHCC-CCAs) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 or LR-TIV (definitely due to HCC) in diagnosing HCC were 68.63% and 85.29%, respectively. LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) had a sensitivity of 72.55% and a specificity of 86.27% in diagnosing non-HCC malignancy. The sensitivity of LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) for iCCA and cHCC-CCA was 82.05% and 41.67%, respectively. Nearly half (11/24, 45.83%) of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-5. Three tesla MR showed higher sensitivity than 1.5 T in diagnosing HCC (80.00% vs 57.69%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

When the effect of field strength was eliminated, LI-RADS v2018 demonstrated high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity in distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver carcinomas. Most iCCAs were categorized as LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy). However, nearly half of cHCC-CCAs were assigned as LR-5.

Clinicopathologic and MRI features of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in patients with or without cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Differences in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas (cHCC-CCAs) arising in high-risk patients with or without liver cirrhosis have not been elucidated. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathologic and imaging characteristics of cHCC-CCAs in patients with or without cirrhosis and to determine the prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resections of single cHCC-CCAs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 113 patients with surgically resected single cHCC-CCAs who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging from January 2008 to December 2019 at two tertiary referral centres. Clinical, pathologic and imaging features of tumours were compared in high-risk patients with or without cirrhosis. Imaging features were assessed using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018. RFS and associated factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test.

RESULTS

cHCC-CCAs arising from cirrhotic livers had a smaller mean tumour size (2.9 cm vs. 4.5 cm; P < .001) and were more frequently categorized as LR-5 or 4 (41.2% vs. 20.0%; P = .024) than those arising from non-cirrhotic livers. In multivariable analysis, a tumour size of > 3 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.081; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.180-3.668; P = .011) and the LR-M category (HR, 2.302; 95% CI, 1.198-4.424; P = .012) were independent predictors associated with worse RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The tumour size and distribution of LI-RADS categories of cHCC-CCAs differed in high-risk patients with or without cirrhosis. And LR-M category was a worse prognosis predictor after curative resections than LR-5 or 4 category.

Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and a major healthcare burden in most societies. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play a pivotal role in the medical care of patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). When stringent imaging criteria are fulfilled, CT and MRI allow for diagnosis, staging, and assessment of response to treatment, without the need for invasive workup, and can inform clinical decision making. Owing to the central role of these imaging modalities in HCC management, standardization is essential to facilitate proper imaging technique, accurate interpretation, and clear communication among all stakeholders in both the clinical practice and research settings. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system that provides standardization across the continuum of HCC imaging, including ordinal probabilistic approach for reporting that directs individualized management. This review discusses the up-to-date role of CT and MRI in HCC imaging from the LI-RADS perspective. It also provides a glimpse into the future by discussing how advances in knowledge and technology are likely to enrich the LI-RADS approach.

Radio-pathologic correlation of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma): changes in the 2019 WHO classification and impact on LI-RADS classification at liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

To explain the new changes in pathologic diagnoses of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (PLC) according to the updated 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and how it impacts Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 209 patients with pathologically proven biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-MRI between January 2009 and December 2018. Imaging analysis including LI-RADS classification and pathologic review including the proportion of tumor components were performed. Frequencies of each diagnosis and subtype according to the 2010 and 2019 WHO classifications were compared, and changes in LI-RADS classification were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine significant tumor component for LI-RADS classification.

RESULTS

Of the 209 biphenotypic PLCs of the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) were diagnosed as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 7 (3.3%) as cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) using the 2019 WHO classification. Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the proportion of LR-5 and LR-M categories between the WHO 2010 and 2019 classifications (p = 0.941). Proportion of HCC component was the only independent factor for LI-RADS classification (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to the 2019 WHO classification, 15% of biphenotypic PLCs from the 2010 WHO classification were re-diagnosed as HCCs or CCAs, and a substantial proportion of biphenotypic PLCs of the 2019 WHO classification could be categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 on Gd-EOB-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Among 209 diagnosed biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) lesions were reclassified as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as HCCs, and 7 (3.3%) as CCAs using the 2019 WHO classification. • Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs at the 2019 WHO classification, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. • LI-RADS classification relied on the proportion of HCC component (adjusted odds ratio,1.02; p < 0.001).

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: An update

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a tumour that exhibits both hepatocytic and biliary differentiation. Classical risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) seem to also predispose patients to the development of cHCC-CCA. The pathological definition of cHCC-CCA has significantly evolved over time. The last 2019 WHO classification highlighted that the diagnosis of cHCC-CCA should be primarily based on morphology using routine stainings, with additional immunostaining used to refine the identification of subtypes. Among them, "intermediate cell carcinoma" is recognised as a specific subtype, while "cholangiolocellular carcinoma" is now considered a subtype of iCCA. Increasing molecular evidence supports the clonal nature of cHCC-CCA and parallels its biphenotypic histological appearance, with genetic alterations that are classically observed in HCC and/or iCCA. That said, the morphological diagnosis of cHCC-CCA is still challenging for radiologists and pathologists, especially on biopsy specimens. Identification of cHCC-CCA's cell of origin remains an area of active research. Its prognosis is generally worse than that of HCC, and similar to that of iCCA. Resection with lymph node dissection is unfortunately the only curative option for patients with cHCC-CCA. Thus, there remains an urgent need to develop specific therapeutic strategies for this unique clinical entity.

Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS

Objective

Data regarding direct comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MR) LI-RADS in diagnosis of non-hepatocelluar carcinoma (non-HCC) malignancies remain limited. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 and CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosing non-HCC malignancies in patients with risks for HCC.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, 94 liver nodules pathologically-confirmed as non-HCC malignancies in 92 patients at risks for HCC from January 2009 to December 2018 were enrolled. The imaging features and the LI-RADS categories on corresponding CEUS and CT/MRI within 1 month were retrospectively analyzed according to the ACR CEUS LI-RADS v2017 and ACR CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 by two radiologists in consensus for each algorithm. The sensitivity of LR-M category, inter-reader agreement and inter-modality agreement was compared between these two standardized algorithms.

Results

Ninety-four nodules in 92 patients (mean age, 54 years ± 10 [standard deviation] with 65 men [54 years ± 11] and 27 women [54 years ± 8]), including 56 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 34 combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinomas, two adenosquamous carcinomas of the liver, one primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma and one hepatic undifferentiated sarcoma were included. On CEUS, numbers of lesions classified as LR-3, LR-4, LR-5 and LR-M were 0, 1, 10 and 83, and on CT/MRI, the corresponding numbers were 3, 0, 14 and 77. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of LR-M between these two standardized algorithms (88.3% of CEUS vs 81.9% of CT/MRI, p = 0.210). Seventy-seven lesions (81.9%) were classified as the same LI-RADS categories by both standardized algorithms (five for LR-5 and 72 for LR-M, kappa value = 0.307). In the subgroup analysis for ICC and CHC, no significant differences were found in the sensitivity of LR-M category between these two standardized algorithms (for ICC, 94.6% of CEUS vs 89.3% of CT/MRI, p = 0.375; for CHC, 76.5% of CEUS vs 70.6% of CT/MRI, p = 0. 649).

Conclusion

CEUS LI-RADS v2017 and CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 showed similar value for diagnosing non-HCC primary hepatic malignancies in patients with risks.

Preoperative MR imaging for predicting early recurrence of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without microvascular invasion

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify preoperative MR imaging features for predicting early recurrence after curative resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without microvascular invasion (MVI).

METHODS

124 patients with MVI-negative HCC who underwent preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced 1.5-T MR imaging before surgical resection were included. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v2018) imaging features and three non-LI-RADS MR imaging features for predicting early recurrence (intrahepatic recurrence<2 years) were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses. A nomogram was constructed for individualized risk estimation, and its predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were identified by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve.

RESULTS

In multivariable analysis, tumor size (p = 0.045), nonsmooth tumor margin (p = 0.013), and presence of mosaic architecture (p = 0.035) were independent significant variables associated with early recurrence. These were all incorporated to establish the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.743 (95 % CI: 0.697-0.788).

CONCLUSION

At dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, tumor size, nonsmooth tumor margin, and presence of mosaic architecture may be helpful to predict early recurrence of solitary HCC without MVI after curative resection.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Atypical Imaging Features: Review of the Morphologic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes With Radiology-Pathology Correlation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cause of cancer death in the United States with the incidence rate more than doubling in 20 years. HCC is unique since a noninvasive diagnosis can be achieved with imaging alone when specific clinical criteria and imaging characteristics are met, obviating the need for tissue sampling. However, HCC is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm. Atypical HCC subtypes vary significantly in their morphology, which can be attributed to specific histologic and molecular features, and can cause deviations from the classic imaging characteristics. The different morphologic subtypes of HCC frequently present a diagnostic challenge for radiologists and pathologists since their imaging and pathologic features can overlap with those of non-HCC malignancies. Identifying an atypical subtype can have important clinical implications. Liver transplant, albeit a scarce and limited resource, is the optimal treatment for conventional HCC, potentially curing both the tumor and the underlying pre-malignant condition. Some HCC subtypes as well as mimickers are associated with unacceptably high recurrence and poor outcome after transplant, and there remains limited data on the role and prognosis of liver transplantation for treatment of rare HCC subtypes. Other subtypes tend to recur later than classic HCC, potentially requiring a different follow-up scheme. This review will discuss the appearance of different HCC subtypes in relation to their histopathologic features. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Update on Pathologic and Radiologic Diagnosis of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a malignant primary liver carcinoma characterized by the unequivocal presence of both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation within the same tumor. Recent research has highlighted that cHCC-CCAs are more heterogeneous than previously expected. In the updated consensus terminology and WHO 2019 classification, "classical type" and "subtypes with stem-cell features" of the WHO 2010 classification are no longer recommended. Instead, it is recommended that the presence and percentages of various histopathologic components and stem-cell features be mentioned in the pathologic report. The new terminology and classification enable the exchange of clearer and more objective information about cHCC-CCAs, facilitating multi-center and multi-national research. However, there are limitations to the diagnosis of cHCC-CCA by imaging and biopsy. cHCC-CCAs showing typical imaging findings of HCC could be misdiagnosed as HCC and subjected to inappropriate treatment, if other clinical findings are not sufficiently considered. cHCC-CCAs showing at least one of the CCA-like imaging features or unusual clinical features should be subjected to biopsy. There may be a sampling error for the biopsy diagnosis of cHCC-CCA. An optimized diagnostic algorithm integrating clinical, radiological, and histopathologic information of biopsy is required to resolve these diagnostic pitfalls.