1
|
Luo F, Geng J, Chen S. Status and Development of Nuclear Medicine Over One Decade in Beijing. World J Nucl Med 2024; 23:73-78. [PMID: 38933075 PMCID: PMC11199036 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1778712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Our objective was to investigate the basic information of the personnel and facilities of nuclear medicine in Beijing. Methods This survey was performed by the Beijing Quality Control Center in 2018. The investigation included personnel, equipment, and clinical applications, and data were then compared with previous surveys. The paper questionnaires were used for the survey, which required information about the personnel, devices, and clinical applications. Results About 38 nuclear medicine departments in Beijing were involved in the survey. The number of nuclear medicine staff was 531 in 2018, showing an increase of 58.7% over the past decade. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) represented the main nuclear medicine facilities, and the total number of surveyed departments was 18, 24, and 34, respectively. The quality control results showed significant improvement from the 2005 levels. The total number of scintigraphy procedures was estimated at 199,607 (153,185 SPECT and 46,422 PET/CT). The estimated annual number of scintigraphy images was 8.9 per 1,000 population for SPECT and 2.7 per 1,000 population for PET/CT during 2018. The most frequent radioiodine-targeted therapy was 131 I-targeted therapy for hyperthyroidism in 2018. Conclusion Nuclear medicine has experienced rapid growth in the past 10 years in Beijing, either in personnel, equipment, and scintigraphy. Future efforts will focus on the use of new isotopes in the diagnosis, implementing quality strategy, and enhancing training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Geng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shengzu Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sosna J, Pyatigorskaya N, Krestin G, Denton E, Stanislav K, Morozov S, Kumamaru KK, Jankharia B, Mildenberger P, Forster B, Schouman-Clayes E, Bradey A, Akata D, Brkljacic B, Grassi R, Plako A, Papanagiotou H, Maksimović R, Lexa F. International survey on residency programs in radiology: similarities and differences among 17 countries. Clin Imaging 2021; 79:230-234. [PMID: 34119915 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the initiative of the ACR International Economics Committee, a multinational survey was conducted to evaluate radiology residency programs around the world. METHODS A 31-question survey was developed. It included: economic issues, program size and length, resident's activities during daytime and call, academic aspects including syllabus and examinations. Data was tabulated using the forementioned thematic framework and was qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS Responses were received from all 17 countries that were invited to participate (France, Netherlands, Israel, UK, Russia, USA, Japan, India, Germany, Canada, Turkey, Croatia, Serbia, Italy, Ireland, Hungary, and Greece). Residency length varied between 2 and 5 years. The certificate of residency completion is provided by a local hospital [4/17 (23%)], University [6/17 (36%)], National Board [6/17 (36%)], and Ministry of Health [1/17 (6%)]. There was variability among the number of residency programs and residents per program ranging from 15 to 300 programs per nation with a 1-700 residents in each one respectively. Salaries varied significantly and ranged from 8000 to 75,000 USD equivalent. Exams are an integral part of training in all surveyed countries. Length of call varied between 5 and 26 h and the number of monthly calls ranged from 3 to 6. The future of radiology was judged as growing in [12/17 (70%)] countries and stagnant in [5/17 (30%)] countries. DISCUSSION Radiology residency programs worldwide have many similarities. The differences are in the structure of the residency programs. Stagnation and uncertainties need to be addressed to ensure the continued development of the next generation of radiologists. SUMMARY STATEMENT There are many similarities in the academic aims and approach to education and training of radiology residency programs worldwide. The differences are in the structure of the residency programs and payments to individual residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Sosna
- Department of Radiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Nadya Pyatigorskaya
- Department of Radiology Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 6, Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabriel Krestin
- Department of Radiology Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Erika Denton
- Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
| | - Kim Stanislav
- Radiology Research and Practical Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Peter Mildenberger
- Department of Radiology, Universitätsmedizin Mainz Klinik und Poliklinik Radiologie, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bruce Forster
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Adrian Bradey
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deniz Akata
- Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Boris Brkljacic
- Department of Radiology, Dubrava Hospital, University of Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Department of Radiology, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Andras Plako
- Department of Radiology, University of Szeged, Hungary
| | | | | | - Frank Lexa
- The Radiology Leadership Institute and Chair of the Commission on Leadership and Practice Development of the American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|