1
|
Leithner D, Sala E, Neri E, Schlemmer HP, D'Anastasi M, Weber M, Avesani G, Caglic I, Caruso D, Gabelloni M, Goh V, Granata V, Kunz WG, Nougaret S, Russo L, Woitek R, Mayerhoefer ME. Perceptions of radiologists on structured reporting for cancer imaging-a survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI). Eur Radiol 2024; 34:5120-5130. [PMID: 38206405 PMCID: PMC11254975 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10397-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess radiologists' current use of, and opinions on, structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging, and to provide recommendations for a structured report template. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey with 28 questions was sent to European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) members. The questionnaire had four main parts: (1) participant information, e.g., country, workplace, experience, and current SR use; (2) SR design, e.g., numbers of sections and fields, and template use; (3) clinical impact of SR, e.g., on report quality and length, workload, and communication with clinicians; and (4) preferences for an oncology-focused structured CT report. Data analysis comprised descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS A total of 200 radiologists from 51 countries completed the survey: 57.0% currently utilized SR (57%), with a lower proportion within than outside of Europe (51.0 vs. 72.7%; p = 0.006). Among SR users, the majority observed markedly increased report quality (62.3%) and easier comparison to previous exams (53.5%), a slightly lower error rate (50.9%), and fewer calls/emails by clinicians (78.9%) due to SR. The perceived impact of SR on communication with clinicians (i.e., frequency of calls/emails) differed with radiologists' experience (p < 0.001), and experience also showed low but significant correlations with communication with clinicians (r = - 0.27, p = 0.003), report quality (r = 0.19, p = 0.043), and error rate (r = - 0.22, p = 0.016). Template use also affected the perceived impact of SR on report quality (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION Radiologists regard SR in oncologic imaging favorably, with perceived positive effects on report quality, error rate, comparison of serial exams, and communication with clinicians. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Radiologists believe that structured reporting in oncologic imaging improves report quality, decreases the error rate, and enables better communication with clinicians. Implementation of structured reporting in Europe is currently below the international level and needs society endorsement. KEY POINTS • The majority of oncologic imaging specialists (57% overall; 51% in Europe) use structured reporting in clinical practice. • The vast majority of oncologic imaging specialists use templates (92.1%), which are typically cancer-specific (76.2%). • Structured reporting is perceived to markedly improve report quality, communication with clinicians, and comparison to prior scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Leithner
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Advanced Radiology Center, Fondazione Universitario Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Melvin D'Anastasi
- Medical Imaging Department, Mater Dei Hospital, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Michael Weber
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giacomo Avesani
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Iztok Caglic
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vicky Goh
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Luca Russo
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Research Centre for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - Marius E Mayerhoefer
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xiao T, Chen J, Liu Q. Management of internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes in mid-low rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:153. [PMID: 38863003 PMCID: PMC11167753 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03427-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
In rectal cancer treatment, the diagnosis and management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LLN) are critical for preventing local recurrence. Over time, scholars have reached a consensus: when imaging suggests LLN metastasis, combining neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with selective LLN dissection (LLND) can mitigate the risk of recurrence. Selective LLND typically encompasses lymph nodes in the internal iliac and obturator regions. Recent studies emphasize distinctions between internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes regarding prognosis and treatment outcomes, prompting the need for differentiated diagnostic and treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tixian Xiao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianan Chen
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nikolic A, Tranter-Entwistle I, McCombie A, Connor S, Eglinton T. The utility of synoptic operation reports in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:63. [PMID: 38689196 PMCID: PMC11061035 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04613-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate documentation is crucial in surgical patient care. Synoptic reports (SR) are structured checklist-based reports that offer a standardised alternative to traditional narrative reports (NR). This systematic review aims to assess the completeness of SR compared to NR in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Secondary outcomes include the time to completion, surgeon satisfaction, educational value, research value, and barriers to implementation. METHODS Prospective or retrospective studies that assessed SR compared to NR in colorectal cancer surgery procedures were identified through a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), CIHNAL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), and Cochrane. One thousand two articles were screened, and eight studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review of 17 papers. RESULTS Analysis included 1797 operative reports (NR, 729; SR, 1068). Across studies reporting this outcome, the completeness of documentation was significantly higher in SR (P < 0.001). Reporting of secondary outcomes was limited, with a predominant focus on research value. Several studies demonstrated significantly reduced data extraction times when utilising SR. Surgeon satisfaction with SR was high, and these reports were seen as valuable tools for research and education. Barriers to implementation included integrating SR into existing electronic medical records (EMR) and surgeon concerns regarding increased administrative burden. CONCLUSIONS SR offer advantages in completeness, data extraction, and communication compared to NR. Surgeons perceive them as beneficial for research, quality improvement, and teaching. This review supports the necessity for development of user-friendly SR that seamlessly integrate into pre-existing EMRs, optimising patient care and enhancing the quality of CRC surgical documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Nikolic
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand.
- Christchurch Hospital, C/O Department of Surgery, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New Zealand.
| | - Isaac Tranter-Entwistle
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Andrew McCombie
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Saxon Connor
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Christchurch Hospital, C/O Department of Surgery, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New Zealand
| | - Tim Eglinton
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Christchurch Hospital, C/O Department of Surgery, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robinson E, Balasubramaniam R, Hameed M, Clarke C, Taylor SA, Tolan D, Foley KG. Survey of rectal cancer MRI technique and reporting tumour descriptors in the UK: a multi-centre British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (BSGAR) audit. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:117-123. [PMID: 37989667 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate variation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique and reporting of rectal cancer staging examinations across the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective, multi-centre audit was undertaken of imaging protocols and information documented within consecutive MRI rectal cancer reports between March 2020 and August 2021, which were compared against American and European guidelines. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma and baseline staging MRI rectum only. RESULTS Fully anonymised data from 924 MRI reports by 78 radiologists at 24 centres were evaluated. Thirty-two per cent of radiologists used template reporting, but these reports offered superior documentation of 13 out of 18 key tumour features compared to free-text reports including T-stage, relation to peritoneal reflection and mesorectal fascia (MRF), nodal status, and presence of extramural venous invasion (EMVI; p<0.027 in each). There was no significant differences in the remaining five features. Across all tumour locations, the tumour relationship to the MRF, the presence of EMVI, and the presence of tumour deposits were reported in 79.5%, 85.6%, and 44% of cases, respectively, and tumour, nodal, and distant metastatic stage documented in 94.4%, 97.7%, and 78.3%. In low rectal tumours, the relationship to the anal sphincter complex was reported in only 54.6%. CONCLUSION Considerable variation exists in rectal cancer MRI acquisition and reporting in this sample of UK centres. Inclusion of key radiological features in reports must be improved for risk stratification and treatment decisions. Template reporting is superior to free-text reporting. Routine adoption of standardised radiology practices should now be considered to improve standards to facilitate personalised precision treatment for patients to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Robinson
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | - R Balasubramaniam
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 6QG, UK
| | - M Hameed
- University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK; University College London, Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - C Clarke
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - S A Taylor
- University College London, Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - D Tolan
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - K G Foley
- Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Ynysmaerdy, Llantrisant, UK; Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Road, Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hazen SJA, Sluckin TC, Horsthuis K, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Tanis PJ, Kusters M. An updated evaluation of the implementation of the sigmoid take-off landmark 1 year after the official introduction in the Netherlands. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1243-1250. [PMID: 37184772 PMCID: PMC10638143 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02803-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The definition of rectal cancer based on the sigmoid take-off (STO) was incorporated into the Dutch guideline in 2019, and became mandatory in the national audit from December 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the STO in clinical practice and the added value of online training, stratified for the period before (group A, historical cohort) and after (group B, current cohort) incorporation into the national audit. METHODS Participants, including radiologists, surgeons, surgical and radiological residents, interns, PhD students, and physician assistants, were asked to complete an online training program, consisting of questionnaires, 20 MRI cases, and a training document. Outcomes were agreement with the expert reference, inter-rater variability, and accuracy before and after the training. RESULTS Group A consisted of 86 participants and group B consisted of 114 participants. Familiarity with the STO was higher in group B (76% vs 88%, p = 0.027). Its use in multidisciplinary meetings was not significantly higher (50% vs 67%, p = 0.237). Agreement with the expert reference was similar for both groups before (79% vs 80%, p = 0.423) and after the training (87% vs 87%, p = 0.848). Training resulted in significant improvement for both groups in classifying tumors located around the STO (group A, 69-79%; group B, 67-79%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show that after the inclusion of the STO in the mandatory Dutch national audit, the STO was consequently used in only 67% of the represented hospitals. Online training has the potential to improve implementation and unambiguous assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J A Hazen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T C Sluckin
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Horsthuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Medical Center, Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaur M, Gupta P, D S, Rana P, Soundararajan R, Kalage D, Das CK, Yadav TD, Gupta V, Kaman L, Gupta P, Saikia UN, Dutta U. An audit of the adequacy of first-time ultrasound reports in patients with non-acute gallbladder wall thickening: Need for gallbladder reporting and data system. Indian J Gastroenterol 2023; 42:741-743. [PMID: 37421574 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01397-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maninder Kaur
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Pankaj Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
| | - Sreenivasulu D
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Pratyaksha Rana
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Raghuraman Soundararajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Daneshwari Kalage
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Chandan K Das
- Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Thakur Deen Yadav
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Vikas Gupta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Lileswar Kaman
- Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Parikshaa Gupta
- Department of Cytology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Uma Nahar Saikia
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Usha Dutta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
el Khababi N, Beets-Tan RG, Curvo-Semedo L, Tissier R, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Lambregts DM. Pearls and pitfalls of structured staging and reporting of rectal cancer on MRI: an international multireader study. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230091. [PMID: 38696592 PMCID: PMC10546463 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate uniformity and pitfalls in structured radiological staging of rectal cancer. METHODS Twenty-one radiologists (12 countries) staged 75 rectal cancers on MRI using a structured reporting template. Interobserver agreement (IOA) was calculated as the percentage agreement between readers (categorical variables) and Krippendorff's α (continuous variables). Agreement with an expert consensus served as a surrogate standard of reference to estimate diagnostic accuracy. Polychoric correlation coefficients were used to assess correlations between diagnostic confidence and accuracy (=agreement with expert consensus). RESULTS Uniformity to diagnose high-risk (≥cT3 ab) versus low-risk (≤cT3 cd) cT-stage, cN0 versus cN+, lateral nodes and tumour deposits, MRF and sphincter involvement, and solid versus mucinous tumours was high with IOA > 80% in the majority of cases (and >80% agreement with expert consensus). Results for assessing extramural vascular invasion, cT-stage (cT1-2/cT3/cT4a/cT4b), cN-stage (cN0/N1/N2), relation to the peritoneal reflection, extent of sphincter involvement (internal/intersphincteric/external) and morphology (solid/annular/semi-annular) were considerably poorer. IOA was high (α = 0.72-0.84) for tumour height/length and extramural invasion depth, but low for tumour-MRF distance and number of (suspicious) nodes (α = 0.05-0.55). There was a significant positive correlation between diagnostic confidence and accuracy (=agreement with expert consensus) (p < 0.001-p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS - Several staging items lacked sufficient reproducibility.- Results for cT- and N-staging g improved when using a dichotomized stratification.- Considering the significant correlation between diagnostic confidence and accuracy, a confidence level may be incorporated into structured reporting for specific items with low reproducibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Although structured reporting aims to achieve uniformity in reporting, several items lack sufficient reproducibility and might benefit from dichotomized assessment and incorporating confidence levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luís Curvo-Semedo
- Department of Medical Imaging, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Biostatistics Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jain AJ, Maxwell JE, Katz MHG, Snyder RA. Surgical Considerations for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4174. [PMID: 37627202 PMCID: PMC10453019 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease process with a 5-year survival rate of only 11%. Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer has multiple theoretical benefits, including improved patient selection for surgery, early delivery of systemic therapy, and assessment of response to therapy. Herein, we review key surgical considerations when selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy and curative-intent resection. Accurate determination of resectability at diagnosis is critical and should be based on not only anatomic criteria but also biologic and clinical criteria to determine optimal treatment sequencing. Borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is best treated with neoadjuvant therapy and resection, including vascular resection and reconstruction when appropriate. Lastly, providing nutritional, prehabilitation, and supportive care interventions to improve patient fitness prior to surgical intervention and adequately address the adverse effects of therapy is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rebecca A. Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Blum SFU, Hertzschuch D, Langer E, Schön F, Oppermann N, Kamin K, Kühn JP, Eberlein-Gonska M, Hoffmann RT. Routine Use of Structured Reporting in Whole-body Trauma CT Facilitates Quality Improvement. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2023; 195:521-528. [PMID: 37019142 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-2364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Structured reporting (SR) is increasingly used. So far, there is minimal experience with SR in whole-body computed tomography (WBCT). The aim of this study was to investigate the value of routine use of SR in WBCT in trauma with a focus on reporting time, reporting errors, and referrer satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Reporting time and reporting errors of CT reports were prospectively quantified for residents and board-certified radiologists 3 months before and for 6 months after implementation of a structured report in the clinical routine. Referrer satisfaction was prospectively quantified by means of a survey before and after the implementation period of SR using a 5-point Likert scale. Before and after results were compared to determine the effect of structured reporting on WBCT in trauma at our institution. RESULTS The mean reporting time was lower when using SR (65 ± 52 min. vs. 87 ± 124 min., p = .25). After 4 months, the median reporting time was significantly lower with SR (p = .02). Consequently, the rate of reports that were finished within one hour rose from 55.1 % to 68.3 %. Likewise, reporting errors decreased (12.6 % vs. 8.4 %, p = .48). Residents and board-certified radiologists reported fewer errors when using SR with 16.4 % vs. 12.6 % and 8.8 % vs. 2.7 %, respectively. General referrer satisfaction improved (1.7 ± 0.8 vs. 1.5 ± 1.1, p = .58). Referrers graded improvements for standardization of reports (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 1.3 ± 1.1, p = .03), consistency of report structure (2.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.4 ± 1.1, p = .09), and retrievability of relevant pathologies (2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1, p = .32). CONCLUSION SR has the potential to facilitate process improvement for WBCT in trauma in the daily routine with a reduction of reporting time and reporting mistakes while increasing referrer satisfaction. KEY POINTS · SR for WBCT in trauma is feasable in clinical routine.. · Reporting time in WBCT in trauma decreases by SR.. · SR for WBCT in trauma has the potential to decrease reporting mistakes.. · SR for WBCT in trauma might increase referrer satisfaction.. CITATION FORMAT · Blum SF, Hertzschuch D, Langer E et al. Routine Use of Structured Reporting in Whole-body Trauma CT Facilitates Quality Improvement. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-2364.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diana Hertzschuch
- Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Eric Langer
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Schön
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Nadine Oppermann
- University Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Konrad Kamin
- University Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Eberlein-Gonska
- Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amr B, MacCormick A, Miles G, Shahtahmassebi G, Roobottom C, Stell D. Estimation of the organ of origin of peri-ampullary malignancy by preoperative CT scan. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:891-897. [PMID: 35593447 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221096284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumors occurring within the pancreatic head commonly arise from the pancreas, duodenal ampulla, distal bile duct, or duodenum. However, they are difficult to distinguish on standard preoperative imaging. PURPOSE To assess the ability of specialist reporting of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to determine the organ of origin of pancreatic cancer (PC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Blinded re-reporting of preoperative imaging from five hospitals was undertaken of a consecutive cohort of 411 patients undergoing surgery for PC between January 2006 and May 2014. Radiological identification of tumor site was determined by the presence of the main tumor bulk within the pancreatic head parenchyma and estimation of the pathological organ of origin of the PC was based on all the reported features. RESULTS Each pathological tumor type was noted to have distinct radiological features. Localization of a visible tumor within the pancreatic parenchyma was seen most commonly in PC (92%) than other tumor types (P < 0.0001). Local invasion into the duodenum was a characteristic feature seen in 79% of patients with ampullary tumors and isolated dilation of the bile duct without dilation of the pancreatic duct was seen most commonly in patients with ampullary or bile duct cancer. In the assessment of tumor origin, good agreement (kappa = 0.6, 0.51-0.68) was noted between the consensus radiology opinion and the final histology result. Overall accuracy was greatest for ampullary cancer (88.1%) and lowest for PC (83.2%). CONCLUSION Radiological assessment of preoperative imaging provides a high degree of accuracy in predicting the organ of origin of peri-ampullary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassem Amr
- 6634University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Andrew MacCormick
- 6634University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Gemma Miles
- 6634University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Carl Roobottom
- 6634University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - David Stell
- 6634University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Andersen RD, Vils Pedersen MR, Hesseldal L, Rafaelsen SR. Using structured templates or free text style in reporting CT staging on colon cancer: a national survey. Acta Radiol 2022; 64:1765-1769. [PMID: 36575645 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221142226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computed tomography (CT) is a widely used method for the staging of colon cancer. Accurate reports could lead to a better preoperative evaluation and planning of the treatment of colon cancer. PURPOSE To evaluate the use of CT free-text reports and structured report templates when it comes to staging CT imaging of colon cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multiple choice questionnaire survey was conducted over four weeks. Online questionnaire software was used, and a link was shared to medical doctors with help from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) and from a social media radiologist group. RESULTS Clinicians preferred the template style (95%), whereas the level of support was lower among the radiologists (76%). All female responders preferred the template style, in contrast to only 84% of the male responders. Furthermore, the survey showed a slightly deficient level of the national CT reporting quality; only 7/13 questions and sub-questions, concerning CT report quality, achieved an approval rate >85%. The colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team consultants who always or usually work with template style reporting of CT scans of colon cancer tend to be more satisfied with the quality and content of the reports, compared to those who rarely use or read template reports. CONCLUSION The following indicators were insufficiently reported: tumor invasion growth; number of hepatic metastases; segment location of hepatic metastasis; and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement. In the template reports group, nearly all participants found relevant information easily accessible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Dam Andersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, Clinical Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Malene Roland Vils Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, Clinical Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Laura Hesseldal
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health; University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital, Clinical Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sluckin TC, Hazen SMJA, Horsthuis K, Beets-Tan RGH, Marijnen CAM, Tanis PJ, Kusters M. Retrospective evaluation of national MRI reporting quality for lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients and concordance with prospective re-evaluation following additional training. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:171. [PMID: 36264440 PMCID: PMC9583997 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The presence and size of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are important factors influencing treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Awareness of the clinical relevance and describing LLNs in MRI reports is therefore essential. This study assessed whether LLNs were mentioned in primary MRI reports at a national level and investigated the concordance with standardised re-review. Methods This national, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study included 1096 patients from 60 hospitals treated in 2016 for primary cT3-4 rectal cancer ≤ 8 cm from the anorectal junction. Abdominal radiologists re-reviewed all MR images following a 2-h training regarding LLNs. Results Re-review of MR images identified that 41.0% of enlarged (≥ 7 mm) LLNs were not mentioned in primary MRI reports. A contradictory anatomical location was stated for 73.2% of all LLNs and a different size (≥/< 7 mm) for 41.7%. In total, 49.4% of all cases did not mention LLNs in primary MRI reports. Reporting LLNs was associated with stage (cT3N0 44.3%, T3N+/T4 52.8%, p = 0.013), cN stage (N0 44.1%, N1 48.6%, N2 59.5%, p < 0.001), hospital type (non-teaching 34.6%, teaching 52.2%, academic 53.2% p = 0.006) and annual rectal cancer resection volumes (low 34.8%, medium 47.7%, high 57.3% p < 0.001). For LLNs present according to original MRI reports (n = 226), 64.2% also mentioned a short-axis size, 52.7% an anatomical location and 25.2% whether it was deemed suspicious. Conclusions Almost half of the primary MRI reports for rectal cancer patients treated in the Netherlands in 2016 did not mention LLNs. A significant portion of enlarged LLNs identified during re-review were also not mentioned originally, with considerable discrepancies for location and size. These results imply insufficient awareness and indicate the need for templates, education and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania C Sluckin
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne-Marije J A Hazen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer : Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:3364-3374. [PMID: 35881198 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03612-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review existing structured MRI reports for primary staging of rectal cancer and create a new, freely available structured report based on multidisciplinary expert opinion and literature review. METHODS Twenty abdominal imaging experts from the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)'s Disease Focused Panel (DFP) on Rectal and Anal Cancer completed a questionnaire and participated in a subsequent consensus meeting based on the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Twenty-two items were classified via a group survey as "appropriate" or "inappropriate" (defined by ≥ 70% consensus), or "needs group discussion" (defined by < 70% consensus). Certain items were also discussed with multidisciplinary team members from colorectal surgery, oncology and pathology. RESULTS After completion of the questionnaire, 16 (72%) items required further discussion (< 70% consensus). Following group discussion, consensus was achieved for 21 (95%) of the items. Based on the consensus meeting, a revised structured report was developed. The most significant modifications included (1) Exclusion of the T2/early T3 category; (2) Replacement of the term "circumferential resection margin (CRM)" with "mesorectal fascia (MRF)"; (3) A revised definition of "mucinous content"; (4) Creation of two distinct categories for suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) and tumor deposits; and (5) Classification of suspicious extra-mesorectal LNs by anatomic location. CONCLUSION The SAR DFP on Rectal and Anal Cancer recommends using this newly updated reporting template for primary MRI staging of rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
14
|
Pilgrim CHC, Maciejewska A, Ayres N, Ellis S, Goodwin M, Zalcberg JR, Haydon A. Synoptic CT scan reporting of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to align with international consensus guidelines on surgical resectability: a Victorian pilot. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2565-2570. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.17999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles H. C. Pilgrim
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Anna Maciejewska
- Southern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service (funded by the Victorian Government) Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Nadia Ayres
- North Eastern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service (funded by the Victorian Government) Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Sam Ellis
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Radiology The Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Mark Goodwin
- Department of Radiology Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - John R. Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Andrew Haydon
- Southern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service (funded by the Victorian Government) Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Blum SFU, Eberlein-Gonska M, Hoffmann RT. Structured Reporting of Whole-Body Trauma CT Scans: Friend, not Foe. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:777-778. [PMID: 35817034 DOI: 10.1055/a-1847-4069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Eberlein-Gonska
- Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The awareness of radiologists for the presence of lateral lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6637-6645. [PMID: 35581479 PMCID: PMC9474434 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08840-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are associated with increased (lateral) local recurrence rates. Size and anatomical location should therefore always be reported by radiologists and discussed during multidisciplinary meetings. The objective was to investigate how often LLNs are mentioned in MRI reports in a tertiary referral centre. Methods A single - centre, retrospective study of 202 patients treated for primary rectal cancer between 2012 and 2020, with at least a T2 tumour located within 12cm of the anorectal junction. The radiology reports were written by 30–40 consultant radiologists. MRI scans were independently re-assessed by an expert radiologist. The primary outcome was how often the presence or absence of LLNs was mentioned in the initial report. Results Primary MRI reports explicitly mentioned the presence or absence of LLNs in 89 (44%) cases. Of the 43 reports with present LLNs, only one (1%) reported on all features such as size, location or malignant features. Expert review revealed 17 LLNs which were ≥ 7 mm (short-axis); two of these were not mentioned in the original reports. In 14/43 (33%) cases, LLNs were discussed during the primary multidisciplinary meeting, while 17/43 (40%) restaging MRI reports failed to report on the previously visible LLN. Reporting LLNs increased significantly with higher N-stage (p = .010) and over time (p = .042). Conclusions Though improving with time, there is still limited consistency in reporting LLNs. Only 44% of primary MRI reports mentioned LLNs and relevant features of those LLNs were seldomly reported. Given the importance of this information for subsequent treatment; increased awareness, proper training and the use of templates are needed. Key Points • Comprehensive reporting of lateral lymph nodes in primary MRI reports was limited to less than 50%. • Lateral lymph nodes are not always discussed during primary multidisciplinary meetings or mentioned in restaging reports. • Improvements in the awareness and knowledge of lateral lymph nodes are needed to ensure adequate multidisciplinary treatment decisions.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Sluckin TC, Couwenberg AM, Lambregts DM, Hazen SMJ, Horsthuis K, Meijnen P, Beets-Tan RG, Tanis PJ, Marijnen CA, Kusters M. Lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer: do we all think the same? A review of multidisciplinary obstacles and treatment recommendations. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:80-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
19
|
Malik RF, Hasanain A, Lafaro KJ, He J, Narang AK, Fishman EK, Zaheer A. Structured CT reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: impact on completeness of information and interdisciplinary communication for surgical planning. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:704-714. [PMID: 34800162 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03353-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the rise in popularity of structured reports in radiology, we sought to evaluate whether free-text CT reports on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) staging at our institute met published guidelines and assess feedback of pancreatic surgeons comparing free-text and structured report styles with the same information content. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 298 free-text preoperative CT reports from 2015 to 2017 for the inclusion of key tumor descriptors. Two surgeons independently evaluated 50 free-text reports followed by evaluation of the same reports in a structured format using a 7-question survey to assess the usefulness and ease of information extraction. Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test for independence were utilized for categorical responses and an independent samples t test for comparing mean ratings of report quality as rated on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS The most commonly included descriptors in free-text reports were tumor location (99%), liver lesions (97%), and suspicious lymph nodes (97%). The most commonly excluded descriptors were variant arterial anatomy and peritoneal/omental nodularity, which were present in only 23% and 42% of the reports, respectively. For vascular involvement, a mention of the presence or absence of perivascular disease with the main portal vein was most commonly included (87%). Both surgeons' rating of overall report quality was significantly higher for structured reports (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that free-text reports may not include key descriptors for staging PDAC. Surgeons rated structured reports that presented the same information as free-text reports but in a template format superior for guiding clinical management, convenience of use, and overall report quality.
Collapse
|
20
|
Rouleau Fournier F, Motamedi MAK, Brown CJ, Phang T, Raval MJ, Hague CJ, Karimuddin AA. Oncologic Outcomes Associated With MRI-detected Extramural Venous Invasion (mrEMVI) in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2022; 275:303-314. [PMID: 33491979 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of MRI-detected EMVI (mrEMVI) as a reliable prognostic factor in rectal cancer has been emphasized in recent years but this finding remains underreported by many institutions. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to demonstrate the importance of pre- and post-treatment MRI-detected EMVI as independent prognostic factors of adverse oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by total mesorectal excision. METHODS This review was designed using the PRISMA guidelines. The following electronic databases were searched from January 2002 to January 2020: CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Ovid Embase. Main outcomes included DFS and overall survival (OS). Other outcomes of interest comprised positive resection margin and synchronous metastases. RESULTS Seventeen studies involving a total of 3821 patients were included for data synthesis. For preneoadjuvant treatment mrEMVI, pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimate for DFS was 2.30 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.54-3.44) for higher recurrence in mrEMVI-positive patients. mrEMVI-positive patients were found to have a lower OS with a pooled HR of 1.68 (95%CI 1.27-2.22). Pooled risk ratio for synchronous metastasis was 4.11 (95%CI 2.80-6.02) for mrEMVI-positivity. For postneoadjuvant treatment EMVI (ymrEMVI), positive status showed a lower DFS with a pooled HR of 2.04 (95%CI 1.55-2.69). Risk ratio of having a positive resection margin status was 2.95 (95%CI 1.75-4.98) for ymrEMVI-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS This review showed that oncologic outcomes are significantly worse for both pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment mrEMVI-positive patients. MRI-detected EMVI should be consistently reported in rectal cancer staging and may provide guidance for the targeted use of additional systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Rouleau Fournier
- Department of Surgery, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Mohammad Ali K Motamedi
- Department of Surgery, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Carl J Brown
- Department of Surgery, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Terry Phang
- Department of Surgery, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Manoj J Raval
- Department of Surgery, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Cameron J Hague
- Department of Radiology, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Ahmer A Karimuddin
- Department of Surgery, St-Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Third Floor, Burrard Building, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bogveradze N, El Khababi N, Schurink NW, van Griethuysen JJM, de Bie S, Bosma G, Cappendijk VC, Geenen RWF, Neijenhuis P, Peterson G, Veeken CJ, Vliegen RFA, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Evolutions in rectal cancer MRI staging and risk stratification in The Netherlands. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:38-47. [PMID: 34605966 PMCID: PMC8776669 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03281-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To analyze how the MRI reporting of rectal cancer has evolved (following guideline updates) in The Netherlands. Methods Retrospective analysis of 712 patients (2011–2018) from 8 teaching hospitals in The Netherlands with available original radiological staging reports that were re-evaluated by a dedicated MR expert using updated guideline criteria. Original reports were classified as “free-text,” “semi-structured,” or “template” and completeness of reporting was documented. Patients were categorized as low versus high risk, first based on the original reports (high risk = cT3-4, cN+, and/or cMRF+) and then based on the expert re-evaluations (high risk = cT3cd-4, cN+, MRF+, and/or EMVI+). Evolutions over time were studied by splitting the inclusion period in 3 equal time periods. Results A significant increase in template reporting was observed (from 1.6 to 17.6–29.6%; p < 0.001), along with a significant increase in the reporting of cT-substage, number of N+ and extramesorectal nodes, MRF invasion and tumor-MRF distance, EMVI, anal sphincter involvement, and tumor morphology and circumference. Expert re-evaluation changed the risk classification from high to low risk in 18.0% of cases and from low to high risk in 1.7% (total 19.7%). In the majority (17.9%) of these cases, the changed risk classification was likely (at least in part) related to use of updated guideline criteria, which mainly led to a reduction in high-risk cT-stage and nodal downstaging. Conclusion Updated concepts of risk stratification have increasingly been adopted, accompanied by an increase in template reporting and improved completeness of reporting. Use of updated guideline criteria resulted in considerable downstaging (of mainly high-risk cT-stage and nodal stage). Graphic abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nino Bogveradze
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Acad. F. Todua Medical Center, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels W Schurink
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shira de Bie
- Department of Radiology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Gerlof Bosma
- Department of Radiology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent C Cappendijk
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Remy W F Geenen
- Department of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Neijenhuis
- Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - Gerald Peterson
- Department of Radiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Veeken
- Department of Radiology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Roy F A Vliegen
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Alvfeldt G, Aspelin P, Blomqvist L, Sellberg N. Radiology reporting in rectal cancer using MRI: adherence to national template for structured reporting. Acta Radiol 2021; 63:1603-1612. [PMID: 34866405 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211057276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, a national workshop program was initiated and a reporting template and manual for rectal cancer primary staging using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was introduced and made available by the national Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of the national template program by identify if there was a gap between the content in Swedish MRI reports from 2016 and the national reporting template from 2014. The aim was to explore and compare differences in content in reporting practice in different hospitals in relation to the national reporting template, with focus on: (i) identifying any implementational differences in reporting styles; and (ii) evaluating if reporting completeness vary based on such implementational differences. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 250 MRI reports from 10 hospitals in four healthcare regions in Sweden were collected. Reports were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with a deductive thematic coding scheme based on the national reporting template. RESULTS Three different implemented reporting styles were identified with variations of content coverage in relation to the template: (i) standardized and structured protocol (reporting style A); (ii) standardized semi-structured free-text (reporting style B); and (iii) regular free-text (reporting style C). The relative completeness of reporting practice of rectal cancer staging in relation to the national reporting template were 92.9% for reporting style A, 77.5% for reporting style B, and 63.9% for reporting style C. CONCLUSION The implementation of template-based reporting according to reporting style A is a key factor to conform to evidence-based practice for rectal cancer reporting using MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Alvfeldt
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Aspelin
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nina Sellberg
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sluckin TC, Hazen SJA, Kusters M. From "East vs West" towards international multidisciplinary collaboration: An appraisal of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:731-737. [PMID: 34755004 PMCID: PMC8560594 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Western and Eastern practices have traditionally differed in their approach to treating lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. While Western clinicians have primarily favored neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy to sterilize lateral compartments, Eastern physicians have often opted for the surgical removed of lymphatic tissue with a lateral lymph node dissection without neoadjuvant treatment. The literature suggests similar oncological outcomes for these two separate techniques, while tangible differences exist. The combination of these paradigms may be beneficial in reducing overall morbidity while sustaining low recurrence rates. This article considers traditional Eastern and Western perspectives, discusses nodal features important for predicting malignancy and attempts to stimulate international, multidisciplinary consensus and collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania C. Sluckin
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam University Medical CentersVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Sanne‐Marije J. A. Hazen
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam University Medical CentersVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam University Medical CentersVrije Universiteit AmsterdamCancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
[Current developments in healthcare information technology : Impact on structured reporting]. Radiologe 2021; 61:986-994. [PMID: 34652454 PMCID: PMC8517570 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00924-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Structured reporting has become established in many radiological applications over the last 20 years. However, its significance is often still seen as being limited to a narrow section of clinical workflows-image reporting and the creation of radiological reports. By placing every clinical and radiological finding in a semantic context from which its clinical meaning can be reproduced at any time, even by digital assistance systems, structured handling of medical data is essential for the interoperability of clinical systems along the entire diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tong G, Zhang G, Zheng Z. Robotic and robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of short-term and long-term results. Asian J Surg 2021; 44:1549. [PMID: 34593279 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.08.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The usage of robotic surgery in rectal cancer (RC) is increasing, but there is an ongoing debate as to whether it provides any benefit. This study conducted a meta-analysis of rectal cancer surgery for short-term and long-term outcome by Robotic and robotic-assisted surgery (RS) vs laparoscopic surgery (LS).Pubmed, Embase, Ovid, CNKI, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies clearly documenting a comparison of short-term and long-term effect between RS and LS for RC were selected. Lymph node harvested, operation time, hospital stay, circumferential resection margins(CRM), complications, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year DFS parameters were evaluated. All data were performed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Nine studies were collected that included 1436 cases in total, 716 (49.86%) in the RS group, 720(50.14%) in the LS group. Compared with LS, RS was associated with longer operation time (MD 35.19, 95%CI [7.57, 62.81]; P = 0.01), but similar hospital stay (MD -0.43, 95%CI [-0.87,0.01]; P = 0.05).Lymph node harvested, CRM, complications, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS had no significance difference between RS and LS groups(MD -0.67,95%CI[-1.53,0.19];P = 0.13;MD 0.86,95%CI[0.54,1.37];P = 0.52;MD 0.97,95%CI [0.73,1.29];P = 0.86;MD 0.94,95%CI[0.60,1.48];P = 0.79;MD 0.88,95%CI[0.52,1.47];P = 0.61 respectively).RS is feasible and safe for RC. It has an advantage in short -term outcome and a similar effect in long-term outcome compared with LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guojun Tong
- Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital Affiliated Huzhou University, Sanhuan North Road 1558#, Zhejiang, 313000, China; Central Laboratory, Huzhou Central Hospital Affiliated Huzhou University, Sanhuan North Road 1558#, Zhejiang, 313000, China.
| | - Guiyang Zhang
- Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital Affiliated Huzhou University, Sanhuan North Road 1558#, Zhejiang, 313000, China
| | - Zhaozheng Zheng
- Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital Affiliated Huzhou University, Sanhuan North Road 1558#, Zhejiang, 313000, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Golia Pernicka JS, Bates DDB, Fuqua JL, Knezevic A, Yoon J, Nardo L, Petkovska I, Paroder V, Nash GM, Markowitz AJ, Gollub MJ. Meaningful words in rectal MRI synoptic reports: How "polypoid" may be prognostic. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:371-376. [PMID: 34517303 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored the clinicopathologic outcomes of rectal tumor morphological descriptors used in a synoptic rectal MRI reporting template and determined that prognostic differences were observed. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. Fifty patients with rectal tumors for whom the synoptic descriptor "polypoid" was chosen by three experienced radiologists were compared with ninety comparator patients with "partially circumferential" and "circumferential" rectal tumors. Two radiologists re-evaluated all cases. The outcome measures were agreement among two re-interpreting radiologists, clinical T staging with MRI (mrT) and descriptive nodal features, and degrees of wall attachment of tumors (on MRI) compared with pathological (p) T and N stage when available. RESULTS Re-evaluation by two radiologists showed moderate to excellent agreement in tumor morphology, presence of a pedicle, and degree of wall attachment (k = 0.41-0.76) and excellent agreement on lymph node presence and size (ICC = 0.83-0.91). Statistically significant lower mrT stage was noted for polypoid morphology, wherein 98% were mrT1/2, while only 7% and 2% of partially circumferential and circumferential tumors respectively were mrT1/2. Pathologic T and N stages among the three morphologies also differed significantly, with only 14% of polypoid cases higher than stage pT2 compared to 48% of partially circumferential cases and 60% of circumferential cases. CONCLUSION Using a "polypoid" morphology in rectal cancer MRI synoptic reports revealed a seemingly distinct phenotype with lower clinical and pathologic T and N stages when compared with alternative available descriptors. PRECIS "Polypoid" morphology in rectal cancer confers a lower clinical and pathologic T and N stage and may be useful in determining whether to proceed with surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - James L Fuqua
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Andrea Knezevic
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Joongchul Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Saint-Eustache, 520 Boulevard Arthur-Sauvé, Saint-Eustache, QC J7R 5B1, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Nardo
- Department of Radiology, University of California-Davis, 4860 Y Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tortora M, Tranfa M, D’Elia AC, Pontillo G, Petracca M, Bozzao A, Caranci F, Cervo A, Cosottini M, Falini A, Longo M, Manara R, Muto M, Porcu M, Roccatagliata L, Todeschini A, Saba L, Brunetti A, Cocozza S, Elefante A. Walk Your Talk: Real-World Adherence to Guidelines on the Use of MRI in Multiple Sclerosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081310. [PMID: 34441245 PMCID: PMC8394408 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Although guidelines about the use of MRI sequences for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and follow-up are available, variability in acquisition protocols is not uncommon in everyday clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world application of MS imaging guidelines in different settings to clarify the level of adherence to these guidelines. (2) Via an on-line anonymous survey, neuroradiologists (NR) were asked about MRI protocols and parameters routinely acquired when MS patients are evaluated in their center, both at diagnosis and follow-up. Furthermore, data about report content and personal opinions about emerging neuroimaging markers were also retrieved. (3) A total of 46 participants were included, mostly working in a hospital or university hospital (80.4%) and with more than 10 years of experience (47.9%). We found a relatively good adherence to the suggested MRI protocols regarding the use of T2-weighted sequences, although almost 10% of the participants routinely acquired 2D sequences with a slice thickness superior to 3 mm. On the other hand, a wider degree of heterogeneity was found regarding gadolinium administration, almost routinely performed at follow-up examination (87.0% of cases) in contrast with the current guidelines, as well as a low use of a standardized reporting system (17.4% of cases). (4) Although the MS community is getting closer to a standardization of MRI protocols, there is still a relatively wide heterogeneity among NR, with particular reference to contrast administration, which must be overcome to guarantee an adequate quality of patients’ care in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Tortora
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Mario Tranfa
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Anna Chiara D’Elia
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Giuseppe Pontillo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Maria Petracca
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- Neuroradiology Unit, NESMOS Department, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| | - Ferdinando Caranci
- Department of Medicine of Precision, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Amedeo Cervo
- Department of Neuroradiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20121 Milan, Italy;
| | - Mirco Cosottini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Andrea Falini
- Neuroradiology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Marcello Longo
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy;
| | - Renzo Manara
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy;
| | - Mario Muto
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Cardarelli Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.) di Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.P.); (L.S.)
| | - Luca Roccatagliata
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Todeschini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, 41126 Modena, Italy;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.) di Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.P.); (L.S.)
| | - Arturo Brunetti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| | - Sirio Cocozza
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Andrea Elefante
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.T.); (M.T.); (A.C.D.); (G.P.); (A.B.); (A.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Prognostic Implications of MRI-Detected EMVI and Tumor Deposits and Their Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in cT3 and cT4 Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:816-825. [PMID: 34146635 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI) and tumor deposits (TDs) are risk factors for the development of local recurrence and distant metastases (DMs) in rectal cancer. However, little is known about their response to neoadjuvant treatment and its relation to oncologic outcomes. This study evaluated the incidence and features of mrEMVI and TDs before and after neoadjuvant treatment in relation to the development of local recurrence and DMs. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with cT3/4 rectal cancer without synchronous metastases who underwent surgery in a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively analyzed. MRI scans were re-evaluated for the presence of mrEMVI, the occurrence of TDs, and response to neoadjuvant therapy (mr-vTRG). RESULTS In total, 277 patients were included, of whom 163 (58.8%) presented with mrEMVI. TDs were present in 56.4% of mrEMVI-positive and 9.6% of mrEMVI-negative patients (P < .001). The 5-year DM rate was significantly higher in mrEMVI-positive patients with and without TDs (45.2% and 35.9%, respectively) compared with mrEMVI-negative patients (25.7%; P = .012). After neoadjuvant treatment, the 5-year DM rate of patients with mr-vTRG 3-5 was 46.1%, whereas good responders (mr-vTRG 1-2) had a DM rate similar to mrEMVI-negative patients (25.7% and 25.7%, respectively; P = .002). The occurrence of TDs and larger mrEMVI size resulted in a lower likelihood of regression of mrEMVI. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of mrEMVI and TDs in cT3-4 rectal cancer is high and is associated with worsened oncologic outcomes. mrEMVI regression (mr-vTRG 1-2), which occured in 25% of the cases, leads to oncologic outcomes similar to those in patients without mrEMVI on baseline MRI.
Collapse
|
29
|
Granata V, Caruso D, Grassi R, Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Rizzati R, Masselli G, Golfieri R, Rengo M, Regge D, Lo Re G, Pradella S, Fusco R, Faggioni L, Laghi A, Miele V, Neri E, Coppola F. Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer Staging and Restaging: A Consensus Proposal. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092135. [PMID: 33925250 PMCID: PMC8125446 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Structured reporting in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making. Abstract Background: Structured reporting (SR) in oncologic imaging is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. The aim of this study was to build MRI-based structured reports for rectal cancer (RC) staging and restaging in order to provide clinicians all critical tumor information. Materials and Methods: A panel of radiologist experts in abdominal imaging, called the members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. The modified Delphi process was used to build the SR and to assess the level of agreement in all sections. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess the internal consistency of each section and to measure the quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also evaluated. Results: After the second Delphi round of the SR RC staging, the panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.8 (range 2–4) and 169, and the SR RC restaging panelists’ single scores and sum of scores were 3.7 (range 2–4) and 148, respectively. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.79 for SR staging and 0.81 for SR restaging. The ICCs for the SR RC staging and restaging were 0.78 (p < 0.01) and 0.82 (p < 0.01), respectively. The final SR version was built and included 53 items for RC staging and 50 items for RC restaging. Conclusions: The final version of the structured reports of MRI-based RC staging and restaging should be a helpful and promising tool for clinicians in managing cancer patients properly. Structured reports collect all Patient Clinical Data, Clinical Evaluations and relevant key findings of Rectal Cancer, both in staging and restaging, and can facilitate clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.G.); (R.F.)
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Medical-Surgical and Translational Medicine-Radiology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (M.R.); (A.L.)
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy; (R.G.); (S.C.); (A.R.)
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy; (R.G.); (S.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy; (R.G.); (S.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Roberto Rizzati
- Division of Radiology, SS.ma Annunziata Hospital, Azienda USL di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Gabriele Masselli
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Division of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (R.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Marco Rengo
- Department of Medical-Surgical and Translational Medicine-Radiology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (M.R.); (A.L.)
| | - Daniele Regge
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy;
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lo Re
- Section of Radiological Sciences, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50139 Florence, Italy; (S.P.); (V.M.)
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.G.); (R.F.)
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Medical-Surgical and Translational Medicine-Radiology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (M.R.); (A.L.)
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50139 Florence, Italy; (S.P.); (V.M.)
| | - Emanuele Neri
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-050-997313 or +39-050-992913
| | - Francesca Coppola
- Division of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (R.G.); (F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhao AH, Matalon SA, Shinagare AB, Lee LK, Boland GW, Khorasani R. Improving the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:885-893. [PMID: 32949276 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02754-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention to improve the completeness of structured MRI reports for patients undergoing initial staging for rectal cancer. METHODS This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study was performed at a large academic hospital. MRI reports for initial staging of rectal cancer in 2017 and 2019 were analyzed pre- and post-implementation of multiple quality improvement interventions in 2018, including harmonizing MRI protocols across the institution, educational conferences and modules, and requiring second opinion consultation for all MRI rectal cancer examinations. The primary outcome measure was the completeness of rectal cancer staging MRI reports, classified as optimal, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory based on the inclusion of 15 quality measures pre-defined by a consensus of abdominal and cancer imaging subspecialists, colorectal surgeons, and radiation oncologists at our institution, based on published recommendations. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate changes in report quality and documentation of each quality measure. RESULTS The study included 138 MRI reports, of which 72 (52%) were completed in 2017 pre-intervention. Post intervention, the proportion of optimal reports increased significantly from 52.8% (38/72) to 71.2% (47/66) (p = 0.035). Documentation of 1 quality measure (N stage) increased post intervention from 91.7% (66/72) to 100% (66/66) (p = 0.029). Documentation of 7 quality measures was 100% post intervention, with a documentation rate of > 95% for all quality measures except radial location of tumor. CONCLUSION A combination of educational and system-wide interventions was associated with an improvement in the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Shanna A Matalon
- Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leslie K Lee
- Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giles W Boland
- Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ramin Khorasani
- Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Granata V, Coppola F, Grassi R, Fusco R, Tafuto S, Izzo F, Reginelli A, Maggialetti N, Buccicardi D, Frittoli B, Rengo M, Bortolotto C, Prost R, Lacasella GV, Montella M, Ciaghi E, Bellifemine F, De Muzio F, Danti G, Grazzini G, De Filippo M, Cappabianca S, Barresi C, Iafrate F, Stoppino LP, Laghi A, Grassi R, Brunese L, Neri E, Miele V, Faggioni L. Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:748944. [PMID: 34917023 PMCID: PMC8670531 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.748944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A Modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. RESULTS The final SR version was built by including n=16 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, n=13 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, n=8 items in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and n=17 items in the "Report" section. Overall, 54 items were included in the final version of the SR. Both in the first and second round, all sections received more than a good rating: a mean value of 4.7 and range of 4.2-5.0 in the first round and a mean value 4.9 and range of 4.9-5 in the second round. In the first round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a poor 0.57: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.7 (range 1-5) and 728 (mean value 52.00 and standard deviation 2.83), respectively. In the second round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a good 0.82: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.9 (range 4-5) and 760 (mean value 54.29 and standard deviation 1.64), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The present SR, based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise following in-depth discussion between expert radiologists in gastro-enteric and oncological imaging, derived from a multidisciplinary agreement between a radiologist, medical oncologist and surgeon in order to obtain the most appropriate communication tool for referring physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Coppola
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Tafuto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS ‘Fondazione G. Pascale’, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Barbara Frittoli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedali Civili, Hospital of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome - I.C.O.T. Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Chandra Bortolotto
- Department of Radiology, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Prost
- Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giorgia Viola Lacasella
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Montella
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Ginevra Danti,
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiology, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmelo Barresi
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alvfeldt G, Aspelin P, Blomqvist L, Sellberg N. Rectal cancer staging using MRI: adherence in reporting to evidence-based practice. Acta Radiol 2020; 61:1463-1472. [PMID: 32106682 PMCID: PMC7653401 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120906663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the first-line imaging modality for local
staging of rectal cancer. The radiology report should deliver all relevant
available imaging information to guide treatment. Purpose To explore and describe if there was a gap between the contents in MRI
reports for primary staging of rectal cancer in Sweden in 2010 compared to
evidence-based practice. Material and Methods A total of 243 primary MRI staging reports from 2010, collected from 10
hospitals in four healthcare regions in Sweden, were analyzed using content
analysis with a deductive thematic coding scheme based on evidence-based
practice. Focus was on: (i) most frequently reported findings; (ii)
correlation to key prognostic findings; and (iii) identifying if any
findings being reported were beyond the information defined in
evidence-based practice. Results Most frequently reported findings were spread through the bowel wall or not,
local lymph node description, tumor length, and distance of tumor from anal
verge. These items accounted for 35% of the reporting content. Of all
reported content, 86% correlated with the evidence-based practice. However,
these included more information than was generally found in the reports.
When adjusting for omitted information, 48% of the reported content were
accounted for. Of the reported content, 20% correlated to key pathological
prognostic findings. Six types of findings were reported beyond the
evidence-based practice, representing 14% of the total reporting
content. Conclusion There was a gap between everyday practice and evidence-based practice in
2010. This indicates a need for national harmonization and implementation of
standardized structured reporting templates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Alvfeldt
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Aspelin
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nina Sellberg
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Improving radiologic communication in oncology: a single-centre experience with structured reporting for cancer patients. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:106. [PMID: 32990824 PMCID: PMC7524991 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00907-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Our aim was to develop a structured reporting concept (structured oncology report, SOR) for general follow-up assessment of cancer patients in clinical routine. Furthermore, we analysed the report quality of SOR compared to conventional reports (CR) as assessed by referring oncologists. Methods SOR was designed to provide standardised layout, tabulated tumour burden documentation and standardised conclusion using uniform terminology. A software application for reporting was programmed to ensure consistency of layout and vocabulary and to facilitate utilisation of SOR. Report quality was analysed for 25 SOR and 25 CR retrospectively by 6 medical oncologists using a 7-point scale (score 1 representing the best score) for 6 questionnaire items addressing different elements of report quality and overall satisfaction. A score of ≤ 3 was defined as a positive rating. Results In the first year after full implementation, 7471 imaging examinations were reported using SOR. The proportion of SOR in relation to all oncology reports increased from 49 to 95% within a few months. Report quality scores were better for SOR for each questionnaire item (p < 0.001 each). Averaged over all questionnaire item scores were 1.98 ± 1.22 for SOR and 3.05 ± 1.93 for CR (p < 0.001). The overall satisfaction score was 2.15 ± 1.32 for SOR and 3.39 ± 2.08 for CR (p < 0.001). The proportion of positive ratings was higher for SOR (89% versus 67%; p < 0.001). Conclusions Department-wide structured reporting for follow-up imaging performed for assessment of anticancer treatment efficacy is feasible using a dedicated software application. Satisfaction of referring oncologist with report quality is superior for structured reports.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hendriks MP, Verbeek XAAM, van Manen JG, van der Heijden SE, Go SHL, Gooiker GA, van Vegchel T, Siesling S, Jager A. Clinical decision trees support systematic evaluation of multidisciplinary team recommendations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:355-363. [PMID: 32627108 PMCID: PMC7383031 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05769-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose EUSOMA’s recommendation that “each patient has to be fully informed about each step in the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway” could be supported by guideline-based clinical decision trees (CDTs). The Dutch breast cancer guideline has been modeled into CDTs (www.oncoguide.nl). Prerequisites for adequate CDT usage are availability of necessary patient data at the time of decision-making and to consider all possible treatment alternatives provided in the CDT. Methods This retrospective single-center study evaluated 394 randomly selected female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer between 2012 and 2015. Four pivotal CDTs were selected. Two researchers analyzed patient records to determine to which degree patient data required per CDT were available at the time of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting and how often multiple alternatives were actually reported. Results The four selected CDTs were indication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, preoperative and adjuvant systemic treatment, and immediate breast reconstruction. For 70%, 13%, 97% and 13% of patients, respectively, all necessary data were available. The two most frequent underreported data-items were “clinical M-stage” (87%) and “assessable mammography” (28%). Treatment alternatives were reported by MDTs in 32% of patients regarding primary treatment and in 28% regarding breast reconstruction. Conclusion Both the availability of data in patient records essential for guideline-based recommendations and the reporting of possible treatment alternatives of the investigated CDTs were low. To meet EUSOMA’s requirements, information that is supposed to be implicitly known must be explicated by MDTs. Moreover, MDTs have to adhere to clear definitions of data-items in their reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Xander A A M Verbeek
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeannette G van Manen
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Sannah E van der Heijden
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Shirley H L Go
- Department of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Gea A Gooiker
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Vegchel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Template reporting increases key colon tumour descriptors. Template reporting was used for less than a third of the patients. High risk of underreporting.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of completeness of the radiological reports in primary local staging colon cancer when using a template. Methods The study used primary staging reports retrieved from the departments RIS/PACS. Five key tumour descriptors were evaluated within each report: tumour morphology (polypoid or annular), information on tumour breach of the colon wall (≥ T3), tumour out-growth in mm, nodal status and TNM in conclusion. The failure to provide a description of the presence or absence of a feature in a report counted as ‘not reported’. To allow comparisons between reporting styles, the template or free-text style of reporting was also recorded. Results During a two year period, a total of 666 patients CT reports were evaluated at the colorectal center multidisciplinary team (MDT) conference. In 200 of these reports a template was used. Information on tumour morphology (polypoid or annular) was present in 81% of the template reports vs 9% in free-text style. The figures in percentage for information on tumour breach of the colon wall (≥ T3) were 93% vs 48 %, tumour out-growth in mm: 51% vs 17%, nodal status: 99% vs 86% and TNM in conclusion: 98% vs 51%. P < 0.0001. Conclusion The present study provides additional support for the routine use of template reports to improve imaging reporting standards in colonic cancer.
Collapse
|
36
|
Owens R, Mukherjee S, Padmanaban S, Hawes E, Jacobs C, Weaver A, Betts M, Muirhead R. Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Rectal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:35-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
37
|
Gupta NA, Mahajan S, Sumankumar A, Saklani A, Engineer R, Baheti AD. Impact of a standardized reporting format on the quality of MRI reports for rectal cancer staging. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020; 30:7-12. [PMID: 32476744 PMCID: PMC7240900 DOI: 10.4103/ijri.ijri_308_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Besides providing a surgical roadmap, rectal MRI plays a major role in treatment planning. We recently started using a structured template for reporting rectal cancer via MRI. We study the impact of using this template at our hospital in terms of number of essential imaging parameters described in the reports as compared to the pre-template free-text reports. METHODS A structured rectal MRI reporting template was created in consensus with members of the colorectal tumour board and was introduced in the department, which included 14 essential parameters to be mentioned in the reports. We conducted a retrospective analysis of rectal MRI reports of 100 cases with histologically proven rectal cancer, comprising 50 consecutive free-text reports before the template was introduced and 50 consecutive structured reports after its introduction, checking for the presence or absence of inclusion of the 14 parameters. An anonymous online feedback survey was conducted as well after the introduction of the template for the members of the colorectal tumour board. RESULTS Overall, the total number of parameters reported increased from a median value of 10 (range 6-13) to 14 (range 12-14). The common unreported parameters prior to template introduction included T staging, presence or absence of restricted diffusion, anterior peritoneal reflection (APR) involvement, and presence or absence of extramural vascular invasion; these were reported in 16%, 22%, 30% and 50% respectively. These improved to 98-100% reporting after template introduction. Maximum improvement was in T staging (16% to 98%) (P < 0.0001), restricted diffusion on DWI (from 22% to 100%) (P < 0.0001) and APR involvement (from 30% to 100%) (P < 0.0001). The most common unreported parameter after template introduction was the "tumoral T2 signal intensity" (unreported in 4% cases). The results of the survey were as follows: 100% felt a decreased need to talk to the radiologist to clarify the report, 81.8% felt an improvement in the quality of reporting as compared to free style reports, and 91% felt that the new template is easier to interpret. CONCLUSION The introduction of a structured template for rectal cancer significantly improved the quality of rectal MRI reports, along with the satisfaction of referring providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeti A Gupta
- Department of Radio Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shivani Mahajan
- Department of Radio Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A Sumankumar
- Department of Radio Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Department of Colo-rectal Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Akshay D Baheti
- Department of Radio Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Performance comparison between MRI and CT for local staging of sigmoid and descending colon cancer. Eur J Radiol 2019; 121:108741. [PMID: 31743882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic performance of MRI and CT for local staging of sigmoid and descending colon cancer, with pathological results as the reference standard. METHOD This retrospective study included 116 patients with sigmoid or descending colon cancer who underwent both MRI and CT before surgery. MRI and CT images were separately reviewed by two independent and blinded radiologists to assess the following features: T-stage, presence of extramural extension (T3-4 disease), lymph node metastases (N+), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI+). Diagnostic performance with sensitivity and specificity for detecting positive status (T3-4, N+ or EMVI+) were assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve, and compared between MRI and CT. RESULTS MRI achieved correct T-stage in 81 of 116 patients (69.8 %) while CT in 66 (56.9 %). For detecting T3-4 disease, MRI showed better performance than CT with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.888 versus 0.712 (P = 0.002) and specificity of 81.82 % versus 54.6 % (P = 0.011). No significance was found in sensitivity between two modalities (89.2 % versus 83.1 %, P = 0.302). For detecting N+ disease, performance of MRI and CT were similar (AUC, 0.670 versus 0.650, P = 0.412). For detecting EMVI+, MRI showed better performance than CT (AUC, 0.780 versus 0.575, P = 0.012) with significantly higher sensitivity (68.6 % versus 40.0 %, P = 0.031) and similar specificity (both are 84.3 %). CONCLUSIONS MRI may offer more superior diagnostic performance than CT for detecting T3-4 disease and EMVI, thereby supporting its alternative application to CT in local staging of colon cancer.
Collapse
|
39
|
Brown PJ, Hyland R, Quyn AJ, West NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Jayne D, Sagar P, Tolan DJ. Current concepts in imaging for local staging of advanced rectal cancer. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:623-636. [PMID: 31036310 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Imaging of rectal cancer has an increasingly pivotal role in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment stratification of patients with the disease. This is particularly true for advanced rectal cancers where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings provide essential information that can change treatment. In this review we describe the rationale for the current imaging standards in advanced rectal cancer for both morphological and functional imaging on the baseline staging and reassessment studies. In addition the clinical implications and future methods by which radiologists may improve these are outlined relative to TNM8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - R Hyland
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A J Quyn
- Department of General Surgery, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Welcome Trust Brenner Building, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bexley Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Jayne
- Department of General Surgery, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - P Sagar
- Department of General Surgery, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D J Tolan
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brown PJ, Rossington H, Taylor J, Lambregts DMJ, Morris EJA, West NP, Quirke P, Tolan D. Radiologist and multidisciplinary team clinician opinions on the quality of MRI rectal cancer staging reports: how are we doing? Clin Radiol 2019; 74:637-642. [PMID: 31084973 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the current opinion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports amongst specialist clinicians involved in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary teams (CRC MDTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Active participants at 16 UK CRC MDTs across a population of 5.7 million were invited to complete a questionnaire, this included 22 closed and three open questions. Closed questions used ordinal (Likert) scales to judge the subjective inclusion of tumour descriptors and impressions on the clarity and consistency of the MRI report. Open (free-text) questions allowed overall feedback and suggestions. RESULTS A total of 69 participants completed the survey (21 radiologists and 48 other CRC MDT clinicians). Both groups highlighted that reports commonly omit the status of the circumferential resection margin (CRM; 83% versus 81% inclusion, other clinicians and radiologists, respectively, p>0.05), presence or absence of extra-mural venous invasion (EMVI; 67% versus 57% inclusion, p>0.05), and lymph node status (90% inclusion in both groups). Intra-radiologist agreement across MRI examinations is reported as 75% by other clinicians. Free-text comments included suggestions for template-style reports. CONCLUSION Both groups recognise a proportion of MRI reports are suboptimal with key tumour descriptors omitted. There are also concerns around the presentation style of MRI reports and inter- and intra-radiologist report variability. The widespread implementation of standardised report templates may improve completeness and clarity of MRI reports for rectal cancer and thus clinical management and outcomes in rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - H Rossington
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - J Taylor
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E J A Morris
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Tolan
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|