Inter- and intra-reader agreement for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI parameter readings in patients with chronic liver diseases

Disease severity prognostication in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a validation of the Anali scores and comparison with the potential functional stricture

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was twofold. First, to validate Anali scores with and without gadolinium (ANALIGd and ANALINoGd) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Second, to compare the ANALIs prognostic ability with the recently-proposed potential functional stricture (PFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 123 patients with a mean age of 41.5 years, who underwent gadoxetic acid-enahnced MRI (GA-MRI). Five readers independently evaluated all images for calculation of ANALIGd and ANALINoGd scores based upon following criteria: intrahepatic bile duct change severity, hepatic dysmorphia, liver parenchymal heterogeneity, and portal hypertension. In addition, hepatobiliary contrast excretion into first-order bile ducts was evaluated on 20-minute hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images to assess PFS. Inter- and intrareader agreement were calculated (Fleiss´and Cohen kappas). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for survival analysis. ANALINoGd, ANALIGd, and PFS were correlated with clinical scores, labs and outcomes (Cox regression analysis).

RESULTS

Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect (ϰ = 0.81) for PFS, but only moderate-(ϰ = 0.55) for binary ANALINoGd. For binary ANALIGd, the agreement was slightly better on HBP (ϰ = 0.64) than on arterial-phase (AP) (ϰ = 0.53). Univariate Cox regression showed that outcomes for decompensated cirrhosis, orthotopic liver transplantation or death significantly correlated with PFS (HR (hazard ratio) = 3.15, p < 0.001), ANALINoGd (HR = 6.42, p < 0.001), ANALIGdHBP (HR = 3.66, p < 0.001) and ANALIGdAP (HR = 3.79, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the PFS, all three ANALI scores, and Revised Mayo Risk Score as independent risk factors for outcomes (HR 3.12, p < 0.001; 6.12, p < 0.001; 3.56, p < 0.001;3.59, p < 0.001; and 4.13, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ANALINoGd and GA-MRI-derived ANALI scores and PFS could noninvasively predict outcomes in PSC patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The combined use of Anali scores and the potential functional stricture (PFS), both derived from unenhanced-, and gadoxetic acid enhanced-MRI, could be applied as a diagnostic and prognostic imaging surrogate for counselling and monitoring primary sclerosing cholangitis patients.

KEY POINTS

Primary sclerosing cholangitis patients require radiological monitoring to assess disease stability and for the presence and type of complications. A contrast-enhanced MRI algorithm based on potential functional stricture and ANALI scores risk-stratified these patients. Unenhanced ANALI score had a high negative predictive value, indicating some primary sclerosing cholangitis patients can undergo non-contrast MRI surveillance.

Comparison of the efficacy of the gadoxetic acid MRI-derived relative enhancement index (REI) and functional liver imaging score (FLIS) in predicting liver function: validation with Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade

PURPOSE

This study compared the predictive performance of the relative enhancement index (REI) derived from gadoxetic acid (GA)-enhanced MRI with that of the functional liver imaging score (FLIS) in estimating liver function among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or liver cirrhosis (LC) by validating them with the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 166 patients (79 women, 87 men; 57.4 years) who were diagnosed with LC or CLD and underwent GA-enhanced MRI between August 2020 and September 2023. The enhancement ratio (ER) is calculated using the formula: ER = [hepatobiliary phase liver signal (SI HBP20)-precontrast liver signal (SI pre)]/SI pre. The REI is calculated using the formula: REI = Liver Volume (LV) × ER. FLIS was assigned from the sum of three HBP image features, each scored between 0 and 2: liver parenchymal enhancement, biliary contrast excretion, and portal vein sign. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff values of ER, REI, and FLIS in differentiating between ALBI grades. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for REI and FLIS to distinguish the ALBI grades. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the ER, REI, and FLIS correlations between the ALBI grades. To evaluate inter-reader reliability for LV, ER, REI, and FLIS, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used.

RESULTS

ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value of REI for predicting ALBI Grade 1 was 899-905 for readers 1 and 2 and 461-477 for ALBI Grade 3, respectively. REI performed best in predicting ALBI Grade 1, achieving an accuracy range of 94%-92.2%, sensitivity of 94.9%-94.1%, and specificity of 91.7%-87.5% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. All parameters showed high accuracy in distinguishing ALBI Grade 3 from other grades. However, REI outperformed the others, showing an accuracy range of 98.8%-97.6%, sensitivity of 94.4%-94.4%, and specificity of 99.3%-98% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. REI showed the best and very strong correlation with ALBI for both readers.

CONCLUSION

REI showed a very strong correlation with the ALBI grades for assessing liver function. It outperformed FLIS in predicting the ALBI grades, indicating its potential as a radiologic tool comparable to or better than FLIS in predicting liver function, especially given its dependence on liver volume.

This Is What Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Looks Like: Potential of a Multiparametric MRI Protocol

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a prevalent condition with a broad spectrum defined by liver biopsy. This gold standard method evaluates three features: steatosis, activity (ballooning and lobular inflammation), and fibrosis, attributing them to certain grades or stages using a semiquantitative scoring system. However, liver biopsy is subject to numerous restrictions, creating an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible method for MASLD assessment, grading, and staging. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), offer the potential to assess quantitative liver parameters. This review aims to provide an overview of the available MRI techniques for the three criteria evaluated individually by liver histology. Here, we discuss the possibility of combining multiple MRI parameters to replace liver biopsy with a holistic, multiparametric MRI protocol. In conclusion, the development and implementation of such an approach could significantly improve the diagnosis and management of MASLD, reducing the need for invasive procedures and paving the way for more personalized treatment strategies.

Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI based radiomics combined with clinical variables in stratifying hepatic functional reserve in HBV infected patients

PURPOSES

To evaluate radiomics from Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR combined with clinical variables for stratifying hepatic functional reserve in hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients.

METHODS

Our study included 279 chronic HBV patients divided 8:2 for training and test cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MR images. Radiomics features were selected to construct a Rad-score which was combined with clinical parameters in two models differentiating hepatitis vs. Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh A vs. B/C. Performances of these stratifying models were compared using area under curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Rad-score alone discriminated hepatitis vs. Child-Pugh A with AUC = 0.890, 0.914 and Child-Pugh A vs. B/C with AUC = 0.862, 0.865 for the training and test cohorts, respectively. Model 1 [Rad-score + clinical parameters for hepatitis vs. Child-Pugh A] showed AUC = 0.978 for the test cohort, which was higher than ALBI [albumin-bilirubin] and MELD [model for end-stage liver disease], with AUCs of 0.716, 0.799, respectively (p < 0.001, < 0.001). Model 2 [Rad-score + clinical parameters for Child-Pugh A vs. B/C] showed AUC of 0.890 in the test cohort, which was similar to ALBI (AUC = 0.908, p = 0.760), and higher than MELD (AUC = 0.709, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Rad-score combined with clinical variables stratifies hepatic functional reserve in HBV patients.

Assessing regional hepatic function changes after hypertrophy induction by radioembolisation: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy

BACKGROUND

To compare Gd-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 99mTc-labelled mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) as imaging-based liver function tests after unilateral radioembolisation (RE) in patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI within a prospective study (REVoluTion) were evaluated. REVoluTion was a prospective open-label, non-randomised, therapy-optimising study of patients undergoing right-sided or sequential RE for contralateral liver hypertrophy at a single centre in Germany. MRI and hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed before RE (baseline) and 6 weeks after (follow-up). This exploratory subanalysis compared liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase MRI normalised to the spleen (liver-to-spleen ratio (LSR)) and the muscle (liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR)) with mebrofenin uptake on HBS for the total liver (TL) and separately for the right (RLL) and left liver lobe (LLL).

RESULTS

Mebrofenin uptake at baseline and follow-up each correlated significantly with LSR and LMR on MRI for TL (≤ 0.013) and RLL (≤ 0.049). Regarding the LLL, mebrofenin uptake correlated significantly with LMR (baseline, p = 0.013; follow-up, p = 0.004), whereas with LSR, a borderline significant correlation was only seen at follow-up (p = 0.051; p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

LSRs and LMR correlate with mebrofenin uptake in HBS. This study indicates that Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-labelled mebrofenin HBS may equally be used to assess an increase in contralateral liver lobe function after right-sided RE.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MRI may be a convenient and reliable method for assessing the future liver remnant facilitating treatment planning and monitoring of patients after RE-induced hypertrophy induction.

KEY POINTS

• Both MRI and HBS can assess liver function after RE. • Liver enhancement on MRI correlates with mebrofenin uptake on HBS. • MRI might be a convenient alternative for estimating future liver remnants after hypertrophy induction.

Using AI and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging to assess liver function, comparing the MELIF score with the ALBI score

Monitoring disease progression is particularly important for determining the optimal treatment strategy in patients with liver disease. Especially for patients with diseases that have a reversible course, there is a lack of suitable tools for monitoring liver function. The development and establishment of such tools is very important, especially in view of the expected increase in such diseases in the future. Image-based liver function parameters, such as the T1 relaxometry-based MELIF score, are ideally suited for this purpose. The determination of this new liver function score is fully automated by software developed with AI technology. In this study, the MELIF score is compared with the widely used ALBI score. The ALBI score was used as a benchmark, as it has been shown to better capture the progression of less severe liver disease than the MELD and Child‒Pugh scores. In this study, we retrospectively determined the ALBI and MELIF scores for 150 patients, compared these scores with the corresponding MELD and Child‒Pugh scores (Pearson correlation), and examined the ability of these scores to discriminate between good and impaired liver function (AUC: MELIF 0.8; ALBI 0.77) and to distinguish between patients with and without cirrhosis (AUC: MELIF 0.83, ALBI 0.79). The MELIF score performed more favourably than the ALBI score and may also be suitable for monitoring mild disease progression. Thus, the MELIF score is promising for closing the gap in the available early-stage liver disease monitoring tools (i.e., identification of liver disease at a potentially reversible stage before chronic liver disease develops).

Relative enhancement index can be used to quantify liver function in cirrhotic patients that undergo gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate MRI with gadoxetic acid to quantify liver function in cirrhotic patients using the relative enhancement index (REI) compared with Child-Pugh score (CPS), MELD score, and indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) and to establish cutoffs for REI to stratify cirrhotic patients into good and poor liver function groups.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 60 cirrhotic patients and calculated CPS, MELD score, ICG-PDR, and REI for each patient. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between REI, CPS, MELD, and ICG-PDR. Good and poor liver function groups were created by k-means clustering algorithm using CPS, MELD, and ICG-PDR. ROC curve analysis was performed and optimal cutoff was identified for group differentiation.

RESULTS

Good correlations were found between REI and other liver function biomarkers: REI and CPS (rho =  - 0.816; p < 0.001); REI and MELD score (rho =  - 0.755; p < 0.001); REI and ICG-PDR (rho = 0.745; p < 0.001)]. REI correlation was stronger for patients with Child-Pugh A (rho = 0.642, p = 0.002) and B (rho = 0.798, p < 0.001) than for those with Child-Pugh C (rho = 0.336, p = 0.148). REI is significantly lower in patients with poor liver function (p < 0.001). ROC curve showed an AUC 0.94 to discriminate patients with poor liver function (REI cutoff < 100; 100% sensitivity; 76% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

REI is a valuable non-invasive index for liver function quantification that has good correlations with other liver function biomarkers. REI can be easily calculated and can be used to estimate liver function in clinical practice in the routine evaluation of cirrhotic patients that undergo MR imaging with gadoxetic acid contrast.

KEY POINTS

• REI is a valuable non-invasive index for liver function quantification that has good correlations with other liver function biomarkers. • REI can be easily calculated in the routine evaluation of cirrhotic patients that undergo gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. • The REI enables stratification of cirrhotic patients into good and poor liver function groups and can be used as additional information, together with morphological and focal liver lesion evaluation.

Effect of type 2 diabetes on liver images of GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI during the hepatobiliary phase

To analyze alterations of the liver appearance during the hepatobiliary phase of individuals with type 2 diabetes who are receiving gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fifty-seven individuals who received Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and had normal liver and renal function but did not have (control group) or have type 2 diabetes (observation group) were retrospectively included in this study. The liver enhancement ratio (LER) and contrast between liver parenchyma and portal vein (LPC) were calculated from hepatobiliary phase images. Utilizing liver to kidney signal intensity, signs of the biliary system, and signs of the portal vein, a functional liver imaging score (FLIS) was calculated. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess the between-group differences in LER, LPC, and FLIS. FLIS constituent ratios between the two groups were tested using the χ² test. The effectiveness of LER, LPC, and FLIS for identifying type 2 diabetes was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). The interobserver consistency of FLIS was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficients. The observation group's LER and LPC were lower than the control group. The constituent ratio of the FLIS score (liver to kidney signal intensity, p = 0.011) showed a significant between-group difference. According to ROCs, LER and LPC were associated with the identification of type 2 diabetes. LER = 0.54 and LPC = 1.46 were the optimal cutoff for identifying type 2 diabetes, respectively. FLIS demonstrated excellent inter-reader agreement. The relative signal intensity of the liver during the hepatobiliary phase is decreased in patients with type 2 diabetes. This should be considered when individuals with type 2 diabetes undergo Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to avoid misdiagnoses, such as small hepatocellular carcinoma or abnormal liver function.

Imaging features facilitate diagnosis of porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder

OBJECTIVES

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is a recently defined vascular liver disease. Since diagnosis remains challenging, we aimed to evaluate radiological features that are distinct between PSVD and cirrhosis.

METHODS

Clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters (CT/MRI) of patients with histologically-confirmed PSVD vs. cirrhosis vs. non-cirrhotic parenchymal liver disease were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-three PSVD, 155 cirrhosis, and 41 non-cirrhotic patients were included. As compared to cirrhosis, PSVD patients were younger and had lower HVPG, liver stiffness, and MELD. Routine clinical and imaging findings indicative of portal hypertension were similarly common. Intrahepatic portal tract abnormalities (49% vs. 15%; p < 0.001), FNH-like lesions (30% vs. 1%; p < 0.001), and abnormal liver morphology defined as peripheral parenchymal atrophy and compensatory hypertrophy of central segments (32% vs. 7%; p < 0.001) were significantly more common in PSVD patients. Hypertrophy of segment I (70% vs. 84%; p = 0.019), atrophy of segment IV (24% vs. 47%; p = 0.001), and nodular liver surface (22% vs. 89%; p < 0.001) were more common in patients with cirrhosis. In patients with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, we identified the distinct imaging feature of "periportal hyperintensity" in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in 42% of patients with PSVD (14/33) vs. 1% in cirrhosis (1/95) vs. 0% in non-cirrhotic controls (0/41); p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of PSVD must be considered in younger patients presenting with clinical features of portal hypertension, portal tract abnormalities, and FNH-like lesions on CT/MRI. 'Periportal hyperintensity' in the HBP of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was identified as a specific radiological feature of PSVD.

KEY POINTS

• Cross-sectional imaging can provide essential information to identify patients with porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD). • Intrahepatic portal tract abnormalities, FNH-like lesions, and abnormal liver morphology are common in PSVD patients. • Periportal hyperintensity on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI seems to be specific for patients with PSVD.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-derived functional liver imaging score (FLIS) and spleen diameter predict outcomes in ACLD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Functional liver imaging score (FLIS) - derived from gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI - correlates with liver function and independently predicts liver-related mortality in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), while splenic craniocaudal diameter (SCCD) is a marker of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a combination of FLIS and SCCD for predicting hepatic decompensation, acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), and mortality in patients with advanced CLD (ACLD).

METHODS

We included 397 patients with CLD who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI. The FLIS was calculated by summing the points (0-2) of 3 hepatobiliary-phase features: hepatic enhancement, biliary excretion, and portal vein signal intensity. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to liver fibrosis severity and presence/history of hepatic decompensation: non-ACLD, compensated ACLD (cACLD), and decompensated ACLD (dACLD).

RESULTS

SCCD showed excellent intra- and inter-reader agreement. Importantly, SCCD was an independent risk factor for hepatic decompensation in patients with cACLD (per cm; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.23; p = 0.004). Patients with cACLD and a FLIS of 0-3 points and/or a SCCD of >13 cm were at increased risk of hepatic decompensation (aHR 3.07; 95% CI 1.43-6.59; p = 0.004). In patients with dACLD, a FLIS of 0-3 was independently associated with an increased risk of ACLF (aHR 2.81; 95% CI 1.16-6.84; p = 0.02), even after adjusting for other prognostic factors. Finally, a FLIS and SCCD-based algorithm was independently predictive of transplant-free mortality and stratified the probability of transplant-free survival (TFS) in ACLD (p <0.001): FLIS 4-6 and SCCD ≤13 cm (5-year TFS of 84%) vs. FLIS 4-6 and SCCD >13 cm (5-year TFS of 70%) vs. FLIS 0-3 (5-year TFS of 24%).

CONCLUSION

The FLIS and SCCD are simple imaging markers that provide complementary information for risk stratification in patients with compensated and decompensated ACLD.

LAY SUMMARY

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to assess the state of the liver. Previously the functional liver imaging score, which is based on MRI criteria, was developed as a measure of liver function and to predict the risk of liver-related complications or death. By combining this score with a measurement of spleen diameter, also using MRI, we generated an algorithm that could predict the risk of adverse liver-related outcomes in patients with advanced chronic liver disease.

Determining the efficacy of functional liver imaging score (FLIS) obtained from gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients with chronic liver disease and liver cirrhosis: the relationship between Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade and FLIS

PURPOSE

(1) To evaluate the efficacy of functional liver imaging score (FLIS) in predicting liver function on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or liver cirrhosis (LC) and its relationship with ALBI grade. (2) To assess the intra-reader reliability and interreader agreement of readers with different levels of experience in abdominal imaging of FLIS.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 131 patients (70 men, 61 women; mean ± SD, 53.7 ± 14.6 years) with CLD and LC who underwent GA-enhanced MRI between November 2019 and March 2022. FLIS was assigned as a result of the sum of three hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images features, each scored 0-2: liver parenchymal enhancement, biliary contrast excretion, and portal vein sign. FLIS was calculated using HPB images independently by three radiologists with different experience. In addition, 50 randomly selected patients were reviewed a second time by a reader to assess intra-reader reliability. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade: ALBI grade 1, 2, and 3. We evaluated the correlation between ALBI grade and both FLIS and its parameters using Spearman's rank correlation for each reader. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to show the optimal cut-off value of FLIS to distinguish between ALBI grades. Intra-reader reliability and inter-reader agreement were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

FLIS and three FLIS parameters showed very strong correlation with ALBI grade for each readers (r =  - 0.843 to 0.976, - 0.831 to 0.962, and - 0.819 to 0.902, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed that FLIS ≥ 5 was the optimal cutoff for prediction of ALBI grade 1 for each readers (sensitivity, 83.7% to 95.4%; specificity, 82.6% to 87%; accuracy, 88.6% to 93.6% and area under the curve (AUC), 0.882 to 0.917), and FLIS ≤ 3 was the optimal cutoff for distinguish ALBI grade 3 from other grades for each readers (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 95.2% to 96%; accuracy, 95.4% to 96.2% and AUC, 0.974 to 0.994). Intra-reader reliability (ICC = 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.96) and inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.85 to 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.97) for FLIS were excellent.

CONCLUSION

FLIS showed a very correlation with hepatic function level and can stratify the ALBI grades. This feature has demonstrated the potential of FLIS to be excellent radiological tools for predicting of liver function of CLD and LC patients in clinical practice. Also, the excellent agreement of FLIS among readers with different levels of experience indicates that it can be used with high accuracy and reproducibility regardless of experience.

Assessment of Liver Function With MRI: Where Do We Stand?

Liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have become a global health burden. For this reason, the determination of liver function plays a central role in the monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease or HCC. Furthermore, assessment of liver function is important, e.g., before surgery to prevent liver failure after hepatectomy or to monitor the course of treatment. Liver function and disease severity are usually assessed clinically based on clinical symptoms, biopsy, and blood parameters. These are rather static tests that reflect the current state of the liver without considering changes in liver function. With the development of liver-specific contrast agents for MRI, noninvasive dynamic determination of liver function based on signal intensity or using T1 relaxometry has become possible. The advantage of this imaging modality is that it provides additional information about the vascular structure, anatomy, and heterogeneous distribution of liver function. In this review, we summarized and discussed the results published in recent years on this technique. Indeed, recent data show that the T1 reduction rate seems to be the most appropriate value for determining liver function by MRI. Furthermore, attention has been paid to the development of automated tools for image analysis in order to uncover the steps necessary to obtain a complete process flow from image segmentation to image registration to image analysis. In conclusion, the published data show that liver function values obtained from contrast-enhanced MRI images correlate significantly with the global liver function parameters, making it possible to obtain both functional and anatomic information with a single modality.

A functional liver imaging score for preoperative prediction of liver failure after hepatocellular carcinoma resection

OBJECTIVES

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a challenging complication after resection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is associated with high mortality. Preoperative prediction of PHLF may improve patient subsequent and reduce such mortality. This study examined whether a functional liver imaging score (FLIS) based on preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict PHLF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 502 patients who underwent preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, followed by HCC resection. Significant preoperative predictors of PHLF were identified using logistic regression analysis. The ability of FLIS to predict PHLF was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and its predictive power was compared to that of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and indocyanine green 15-min retention rate (ICG-R15).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, PHLF was independently associated with FLIS (OR 0.452, 95% CI 0.361 to 0.568, p < 0.001) and major resection (OR 1.898, 95% CI 1.057 to 3.408, p = 0.032). FLIS was associated with a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.752) than the MELD score (0.557), ALBI score (0.609), or ICG-R15 (0.605) (all p < 0.05). Patients with FLIS ≤ 4 who underwent major resection were at 9.4-fold higher risk of PHLF than patients with lower FLIS who underwent minor resection.

CONCLUSION

FLIS is an independent predictor of PHLF, and it may perform better than the MELD score, ALBI score, and ICG-R15 clearance. We propose treating elevated FLIS and major resection as risk factors for PHLF.

KEY POINTS

• A functional liver imaging score can independently predict posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with HCC. • The score may predict such failure better than MELD and ALBI scores and ICG-R15. • Patients with scores ≤ 4 who undergo major hepatic resection may be at nearly tenfold higher risk of posthepatectomy liver failure.

Correlation of liver enhancement in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with liver functions: a multicenter-multivendor analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from SORAMIC trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the correlation between liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase and liver function parameters in a multicenter, multivendor study.

METHODS

A total of 359 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using a standardized protocol with various scanners within a prospective multicenter phase II trial (SORAMIC) were evaluated. The correlation between liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase normalized to the spleen (liver-to-spleen ratio, LSR) and biochemical laboratory parameters, clinical findings related to liver functions, liver function grading systems (Child-Pugh and Albumin-Bilirubin [ALBI]), and scanner characteristics were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive correlation between LSR and albumin (rho = 0.193; p < 0.001), platelet counts (rho = 0.148; p = 0.004), and sodium (rho = 0.161; p = 0.002); and a negative correlation between LSR and total bilirubin (rho = -0.215; p < 0.001) and AST (rho = -0.191; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed independent significance for each of albumin (p = 0.022), total bilirubin (p = 0.045), AST (p = 0.031), platelet counts (p = 0.012), and sodium (p = 0.006). The presence of ascites (1.47 vs. 1.69, p < 0.001) and varices (1.55 vs. 1.69, p = 0.006) was related to significantly lower LSR. Similarly, patients with ALBI grade 1 had significantly higher LSR than patients with grade 2 (1.74 ± 0.447 vs. 1.56 ± 0.408, p < 0.001); and Child-Pugh A patients had a significantly higher LSR than Child-Pugh B (1.67 ± 0.44 vs. 1.49 ± 0.33, p = 0.021). Also, LSR was negatively correlated with MELD-Na scores (rho = -0.137; p = 0.013). However, one scanner brand was significantly associated with lower LSR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The liver enhancement on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is correlated with biomarkers of liver functions in a multicenter cohort. However, this correlation shows variations between scanner brands.

KEY POINTS

• The correlation between liver enhancement on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and liver function is consistent in a multicenter-multivendor cohort. • Signal intensity-based indices (liver-to-spleen ratio) can be used as an imaging biomarker of liver function. • However, absolute values might change between vendors.

How frequently does hepatocellular carcinoma develop in at-risk patients with a negative liver MRI examination with intravenous Gadobenate dimeglumine?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of development of clinically significant liver nodules (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M) after a negative MRI in an HCC screening population.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients at risk of developing HCC requiring imaging surveillance who had undergone multiphase Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI that was negative and had follow up LI-RADS compliant multiphase CTs or MRIs for at least 12 months or positive follow-up within 12 months. Follow-up examinations were classified as negative (no nodules or only LR-1 nodules) or positive (nodule other than LR-1). Time-to-first positive examination, types of nodules, and cumulative incidence of nodule development were recorded.

RESULTS

204 patients (mean age 58.9 ± 10.2 years, 128 women), including 172 with cirrhosis, were included. Based CT/MRI follow-up (median 35 months, range 12-80 months), the overall cumulative incidence of developing a nodule was 10.5%. Cumulative incidence of nodule development was: 0.5% at 6-9 months and 2.1% at 12 ± 3 months, including one LR-4 nodule, one LR-M nodule, and two LR-3 nodules. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant nodule development was 1.1% at 9-15 months. 70% (143/204) of patients also underwent at least one US follow-up, and no patient developed a positive US examination following index negative MRI.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant liver nodules develop in 1.1% of at-risk patients in the first year following negative MRI. While ongoing surveillance is necessary for at-risk patients, our study suggests than longer surveillance intervals after a negative MRI may be reasonable and that further research is needed to explore this possibility.

Consensus report from the 9th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging: applications of gadoxetic acid-enhanced imaging

Objectives

The 9th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was held in Singapore in September 2019, bringing together radiologists and allied specialists to discuss the latest developments in and formulate consensus statements for liver MRI, including the applications of gadoxetic acid–enhanced imaging.

Methods

As at previous Liver Forums, the meeting was held over 2 days. Presentations by the faculty on days 1 and 2 and breakout group discussions on day 1 were followed by delegate voting on consensus statements presented on day 2. Presentations and discussions centered on two main meeting themes relating to the use of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in primary liver cancer and metastatic liver disease.

Results and conclusions

Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI offers the ability to monitor response to systemic therapy and to assist in pre-surgical/pre-interventional planning in liver metastases. In hepatocellular carcinoma, gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI provides precise staging information for accurate treatment decision-making and follow-up post therapy. Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI also has potential, currently investigational, indications for the functional assessment of the liver and the biliary system. Additional voting sessions at the Liver Forum debated the role of multidisciplinary care in the management of patients with liver disease, evidence to support the use of abbreviated imaging protocols, and the importance of standardizing nomenclature in international guidelines in order to increase the sharing of scientific data and improve the communication between centers.

Key Points

• Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI is the preferred imaging method for pre-surgical or pre-interventional planning for liver metastases after systemic therapy.

• Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI provides accurate staging of HCC before and after treatment with locoregional/biologic therapies.

• Abbreviated protocols for gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI offer potential time and cost savings, but more evidence is necessary. The use of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for the assessment of liver and biliary function is under active investigation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07637-4.

Quantification of liver function using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents, most notably gadoxetic acid (GA), has expanded the role of MRI, allowing not only a morphologic but also a functional evaluation of the hepatobiliary system. The mechanism of uptake and excretion of gadoxetic acid via transporters, such as organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1,3), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and MRP3, has been elucidated in the literature. Furthermore, GA uptake can be estimated on either static images or on dynamic imaging, for example, the hepatic extraction fraction (HEF) and liver perfusion. GA-enhanced MRI has achieved an important role in evaluating morphology and function in chronic liver diseases (CLD), allowing to distinguish between the two subgroups of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD), simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and help to stage fibrosis and cirrhosis, predict liver transplant graft survival, and preoperatively evaluate the risk of liver failure if major resection is planned. Finally, because of its noninvasive nature, GA-enhanced MRI can be used for long-term follow-up and post-treatment monitoring. This review article aims to describe the current role of GA-enhanced MRI in quantifying liver function in a variety of hepatobiliary disorders.

MRI-defined sarcopenia predicts mortality in patients with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To explore whether sarcopenia, diagnosed by an abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol is a risk factor for hepatic decompensation and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre study we included 265 patients (164 men, mean age 54 ± 16 years) with CLD who had undergone MRI of the liver between 2010 and 2015. Transverse psoas muscle thickness (TPMT) was measured on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted axial images. Sarcopenia was defined by height-adjusted and gender-specific cut-offs in women as TPMT < 8 mm/m and in men as TPMT < 12 mm/m respectively. Patients were further stratified into three prognostic stages according to the absence of advanced fibrosis (FIB-4 < 1.45, non-advanced CLD), compensated-advanced CLD (cACLD) and decompensated-advanced CLD (dACLD).

RESULTS

The inter-observer agreement for the TPMT measurements (κ = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:0.96-0.98), as well as the intra-observer agreement between the three image sequences (κ = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-1.00) were excellent. Sarcopenia was not predictive of first or further hepatic decompensation. In patients with cACLD and dACLD, sarcopenia was a risk factor for mortality (cACLD: hazard ratio (HR):3.13, 95% CI: 1.33-7.41, P = .009; dACLD:HR:2.45, 95% CI: 1.32-4.57, P = .005) on univariate analysis. After adjusting for the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, albumin and evidence of clinical significant portal hypertension, sarcopenia (adjusted HR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.02-7.42, P = .045) remained an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with cACLD.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia can be easily evaluated by a short MRI exam without the need for contrast injection. Sarcopenia is a risk factor for mortality, especially in patients with cACLD.

Other types of diffuse liver disease: is there a way to do it?

There are a variety of less common diffuse liver diseases that can be asymptomatic or cause severe liver dysfunction. For the majority of them, the association of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings are needed to narrow the differential diagnosis. In this article, we will review and describe the rarer diffuse liver diseases including drug-related liver disease, inflammatory and infectious diseases, and deposition disorders such as amyloidosis, glycogen storage disease, Wilson's disease, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Abdominal radiologists should be familiar with the imaging features of different types of diffuse liver diseases to help the multidisciplinary team involved in the treatment of these patients. The data related to some of these conditions are scarce and sometimes experimental, but we want to demonstrate to the reader the value of imaging techniques in their analysis and introduce the potential of new imaging methods.

Intra-individual comparison of dual portal venous phases for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma at gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performances of first and second portal venous phases (PVP1 and PVP2) in revealing washout and capsule appearance for non-invasive HCC diagnoses in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 123 at-risk patients with 160 hepatic observations (HCCs, n = 116; non-HCC malignancies, n = 18; benign, n = 26) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) ≥ 1 cm at Gd-EOB-MRI. The mean time intervals from gadoxetic acid injection to PVP1 and PVP2 acquisitions were 53 ± 2 s and 73 ± 3 s, respectively. After evaluating image findings independently, imaging findings and diagnoses were finalized by a consensus of two radiologists using either PVP1 or PVP2 image sets according to the LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared.

RESULTS

Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsule were observed in PVP2 (83.6% and 27.6%) than in PVP1 (50.9% and 19.8%) (p < 0.001, both). The PVP2 set presented significantly higher sensitivity (83.6% vs. 53.5%, LI-RADS; 82.8% vs. 50.0%, EASL; p < 0.001, both) and accuracy (0.88 vs. 0.73, LI-RADS; 0.88 vs. 0.72, EASL; p < 0.001, both) than the PVP1 set without significant specificity loss (93.2% vs. 93.2%, by LI-RADS or EASL; p = 0.32, both). None of the non-HCC malignancy was non-invasively diagnosed as HCC in both PVP image sets.

CONCLUSION

Late acquisition of PVP detected washout and enhancing capsule of HCC more sensitively than early acquisition, enabling accurate diagnoses of HCC, according to LI-RADS or EASL criteria.

KEY POINTS

• Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsules were observed in PVP2 than PVP1, quantitatively and qualitatively. • The portal venous phase acquired at around 70 s after contrast media administration (PVP2) provided significantly higher sensitivity and AUC value than PVP1 by using LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. • More HCCs were categorized as LR-5 in PVP2 than in PVP1 images, and the specificity of PVP2 (93.5%) was comparable with PVP1 (93.5%).