Interobserver variability and likelihood of malignancy for fifth edition BI-RADS MRI descriptors in non-mass breast lesions

Contrıbutıon of Kaıser score in non-mass enhanced breast lesions

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Kaiser Score (KS) in diagnosing Non-mass enhanced (NME) lesions and its impact on the inter-reader agreement between experienced and inexperienced readers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 189 NME lesions from 182 MRIs. Two readers (an experienced radiologist and a radiology resident) independently evaluated lesions using the KS, blinded to clinical and pathological data. The KS was modified (MKS) by adding 2 points for microcalcifications on mammography and subtracting 4 points for ADC values > 1.4 x 10^-3 mm2/s. Interobserver agreement was assessed with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and diagnostic performance was evaluated via ROC analysis, with sensitivity and specificity calculated at > 4 and > 5 cut-offs.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement improved with MKS (ICC: 0.763) compared to KS (ICC: 0.667). For the experienced reader, both KS and MKS achieved high sensitivity (>94 %) at a cut-off of > 4. At > 5, specificity improved from 40.5 % to 58.7 % for KS and 39.1 % to 55.8 % for MKS without significantly affecting sensitivity. For the inexperienced reader, MKS improved sensitivity (96.8 %) and specificity (39 %) at > 4. At > 5, specificity increased to 55.8 %, with a non-significant decrease in sensitivity (86.2 %).

CONCLUSION

The Kaiser Score is a quick and systematic tool that enhances diagnostic accuracy and reduces biopsy rates, particularly benefiting inexperienced readers. While higher thresholds improve specificity for experienced readers, they may reduce sensitivity for inexperienced readers, potentially missing malignancies. As a complement to BI-RADS, the Kaiser Score helps standardize evaluations and bridge experience gaps in MRI interpretation.

Role of breast MRI BI-RADS descriptors in discrimination of non-mass enhancement lesion: A systematic review & meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of BI-RADS 5th edition distribution and type of enhancement descriptors with the malignancy of non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions.

METHODS

Medline via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Embase databases were systematically searched from January 2013 to July 2022 for original studies, written in English, reporting the positive predictive value (PPV) of individual BI-RADS 5th edition descriptors (distribution and type of enhancement) of NME lesions. Risk of bias and quality of included studies were assessed by QUADAS 2 appraisal tool. Odds ratio (OR) of pathologically confirmed malignant results in each distribution and internal enhancement were pooled in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies for a total of 1095 lesions were included. The pooled OR of malignancy for linear, focal, segmental, regional, multiple region, and diffuse distributions are 0.70 (95%CI: 0.44-1.14), 0.37 (95% CI: 0.26-0.54), 2.42 (95% CI: 1.62-3.62), 0.56 (95% CI: 0.11-2.79), 2.80 (95% CI: 0.96-8.21), and 3.35 (95% CI: 0.59-19.04), respectively. The pooled OR of malignancy for homogenous, heterogeneous, clustered ring enhancement, and clumped enhancement are 0.39 (95% CI: 0.23-0.67), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.40-0.85), 2.92 (95% CI: 1.86-4.57), and 1.49 (95% CI: 0.96-2.32), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on a meta-analysis of 8 studies and more than one thousand non-mass enhancing lesions, diffuse, multiple regions and clustered ring descriptors of enhancement have the highest pooled OR for malignancy.

Magnetic resonance imaging features and diagnostic value analysis of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast

Background

Due to the presence of distinctive morphological features and diverse pathological types, evaluation of breast non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging, generating more false-positive results as compared to enhancing mass lesions. Our objective was to identify the MRI features capable of distinguishing between benign and malignant NME lesions in the breast.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted, in which the clinical data and MRI manifestations of 101 NME lesions were examined and confirmed through surgical or biopsy pathology. Statistical analyses, including t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, χ2 tests, Fisher exact tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, were employed to compare the MRI characteristics and clinical features of benign and malignant NME lesions.

Results

The study included 101 NME lesions from 98 patients (34 benign and 67 malignant). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of clinical characteristics between the benign and malignant groups. However, there were significant differences in lesion maximum diameter (P=0.003), morphological distribution (P=0.003), internal enhancement patterns (P<0.001), time-intensity curve (TIC) types (P<0.001), early and delayed enhancement rates (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and T2 ratio (P=0.02). Notably, the diagnostic efficacy of ADC values was highest for the minimum value within a small region of interest (small ROI), yielding an area under the curve as high as 0.884.

Conclusions

A comprehensive analysis of MRI features indicated their significant value for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant NME lesions of the breast.

Predictive factors for non-mass enhancement occult in conventional breast imaging: The "PAMAS" study

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictive factors for malignancy in non-mass enhancement occult on conventional imaging (NMEOCI) using MRI, focusing on morphological traits and clinical contexts to refine management strategies.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This retrospective single-center study reviewed all MRI-guided biopsies performed for NMEOCI between January 2015 and October 2021 at a European oncology reference facility. Exclusion criteria were unavailability of the MRI that led to the biopsy, inability to perform control clip MRI or surgery certifying correct targeting, and clustered ring enhancement. Clinical and radiological characteristics were analyzed, and a multivariate logistic regression model assessed associations with malignancy as confirmed by pathological analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients (median age, 58.0 years (Q1-Q3: 45.5-68.0), 128 women) were evaluated. Increased risk of malignancy was associated with older age (p = 0.013), preoperative context (p = 0.050), presence of homolateral neoplasia (p = 0.031), or axillary adenomegaly (p = 0.034). In contrast, MRIs performed without indications (p = 0.044) or as part of screening for high-risk patients (p = 0.033) were protective. NMEOCI features such as larger size (p < 0.001), segmental distribution (p < 0.001), and micronodular character (p < 0.001) were correlated with malignancy risk, whereas homogeneous enhancement suggested benignity (p < 0.001). Five of these characteristics were independently associated with lesions at risk of malignancy: preoperative context, age of patient, micronodular enhancement, axillary adenomegaly, and segmental distribution.

CONCLUSION

Morphological characteristics and clinical contexts of NMEOCIs on MRI are associated with malignancy risk. The mnemonic acronym "PAMAS" ("not a mass" in French) is a useful guide for this type of lesion: Preoperative context, Age, Micronodular enhancement, axillary Adenomegaly, and Segmental distribution, are independently associated with lesions at risk of malignancy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study enhances the precision of MRI for the analysis of NMEOCI by identifying key morphological and clinical predictors of malignancy, some of which have never been studied before, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies, and optimizing patient management.

Asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associated factors, diagnostic workup, and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVES

To summarize our institutional experience with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) exams reporting asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement (BPE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive CEMs performed between December 2012 and July 2023 were retrospectively reviewed to identify exams reporting asymmetric BPE. Associated factors, the level of reporting certainty, BI-RADS score, diagnostic workup, and clinical outcome were summarized. BPE grades and BI-RADS were compared between initial CEM vs. immediate MRI and 6-month follow-up CEM, when indicated, using the Sign test.

RESULTS

Overall, 175/12,856 (1.4%) CEMs (140 female patients, mean age, 46 ± 8.0 years) reported asymmetric BPE. Reporting certainty was mostly high (n = 86), then moderate (n = 59) and low (n = 30). Associated factors included contralateral irradiation (n = 94), recent ipsilateral breast treatment (n = 14), and unilateral breastfeeding (n = 4). BI-RADS scores were 0 (n = 21), 1/2 (n = 75), 3 (n = 67), 4 (n = 3), and 6 (n = 1), or given for a finding other than asymmetric BPE (n = 8). Initial diagnostic-workup often included targeted-US (n = 107). Immediate MRI (n = 65) and/or 6-month CEM follow-up (n = 69) downgraded most cases, with a significant decrease in BPE grade compared to the initial CEM (p < 0.01 for both). On follow-up, two underlying cancers were diagnosed in the area of questionable asymmetric BPE.

CONCLUSION

Apparent asymmetric BPE is most often a benign finding with an identifiable etiology. However, rarely, it may mask an underlying malignancy presenting as non-mass enhancement, thus requiring additional scrutiny.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The variability in the diagnostic-workup of apparent asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement stresses the clinical challenge of this radiological finding. Further studies are required to verify these initial observations and to establish standardized management guidelines.

KEY POINTS

Apparent asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement usually represents a benign clinical correlate, though rarely it may represent malignancy. Evaluation of asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement varied considerably in the metrics that were examined. Targeted US and MRI can be useful in evaluating unexplained asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement.

Clinical and Imaging Features Associated With Malignant Focal Nonmass Enhancement on Breast MRI

INTRODUCTION

Focal non-mass enhancement (NME) is a common breast MRI finding with limited data to guide management. This study aimed to assess clinical and imaging features of malignant BI-RADS 4 focal NME.

METHODS

This IRB-approved, retrospective study included breast MRI exams between August 1, 2013 and September 1, 2022 yielding BI-RADS 4 focal NME lesions that underwent core biopsy or excision with available pathology result or demonstrated decrease or resolution during follow-up MRI or at least 2 years of MRI stability.

RESULTS

A total of 296 BI-RADS 4 focal NME lesions in 246 patients were included in the study. The overall malignancy rate of BI-RADS 4 focal NME was 36/296 (12.2%). Focal NME in a patient presenting for evaluation of extent of disease or other diagnostic concern was 5.5 and 3.4 times more likely, respectively, to be malignant compared to focal NME seen on a high-risk screening exam. There was also a significant association between malignancy and focal NME that was brighter than background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. There was no significant association between malignancy and lesion size, internal enhancement pattern, amount of BPE, amount of fibroglandular tissue, or signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

CONCLUSION

Our study yielded a malignancy rate of 12.2% for BI-RADS 4 focal NME lesions. Indication for MRI and signal intensity compared to BPE on MIP images were features associated with malignancy that may provide guidance on the management for focal NME.

Tumor Morphology for Prediction of Poor Responses Early in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

This multicenter and retrospective study investigated the additive value of tumor morphologic features derived from the functional tumor volume (FTV) tumor mask at pre-treatment (T0) and the early treatment time point (T1) in the prediction of pathologic outcomes for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 910 patients enrolled in the multicenter I-SPY 2 trial were included. FTV and tumor morphologic features were calculated from the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. A poor response was defined as a residual cancer burden (RCB) class III (RCB-III) at surgical excision. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive performance. The analysis was performed in the full cohort and in individual sub-cohorts stratified by hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.

RESULTS

In the full cohort, the AUCs for the use of the FTV ratio and clinicopathologic data were 0.64 ± 0.03 (mean ± SD [standard deviation]). With morphologic features, the AUC increased significantly to 0.76 ± 0.04 (p < 0.001). The ratio of the surface area to volume ratio between T0 and T1 was found to be the most contributing feature. All top contributing features were from T1. An improvement was also observed in the HR+/HER2- and triple-negative sub-cohorts. The AUC increased significantly from 0.56 ± 0.05 to 0.70 ± 0.06 (p < 0.001) and from 0.65 ± 0.06 to 0.73 ± 0.06 (p < 0.001), respectively, when adding morphologic features.

CONCLUSION

Tumor morphologic features can improve the prediction of RCB-III compared to using FTV only at the early treatment time point.

A risk prediction stratification for non-mass breast lesions, combining clinical characteristics and imaging features on ultrasound, mammography, and MRI

Objectives

Given the inevitable trend of domestic imaging center mergers and the current lack of comprehensive imaging evaluation guidelines for non-mass breast lesions, we have developed a novel BI-RADS risk prediction and stratification system for non-mass breast lesions that integrates clinical characteristics with imaging features from ultrasound, mammography, and MRI, with the aim of assisting clinicians in interpreting imaging reports.

Methods

This study enrolled 350 patients with non-mass breast lesions (NMLs), randomly assigning them to a training set of 245 cases (70%) and a test set of 105 cases (30%). Radiologists conducted comprehensive evaluations of the lesions using ultrasound, mammography, and MRI. Independent predictors were identified using LASSO logistic regression, and a predictive risk model was constructed using a nomogram generated with R software, with subsequent validation in both sets.

Results

LASSO logistic regression identified a set of independent predictors, encompassing age, clinical palpation hardness, distribution and morphology of calcifications, peripheral blood supply as depicted by color Doppler imaging, maximum lesion diameter, patterns of internal enhancement, distribution of non-mass lesions, time-intensity curve (TIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The predictive model achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.873 for the training group and 0.877 for the testing group. The model's positive predictive values were as follows: BI-RADS 2 = 0%, BI-RADS 3 = 0%, BI-RADS 4A = 6.25%, BI-RADS 4B = 26.13%, BI-RADS 4C = 80.84%, and BI-RADS 5 = 97.33%.

Conclusion

The creation of a risk-predictive BI-RADS stratification, specifically designed for non-mass breast lesions and integrating clinical and imaging data from multiple modalities, significantly enhances the precision of diagnostic categorization for these lesions.

Initial MRI findings predictive of a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatments in HER2-positive breast cancers

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine if initial MRI findings could predict a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in HER2-positive breast cancers.

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 111 patients (Center 1, training set) and 71 patients (Center 2, validation set) with HER2-positive cancer who underwent NST. Initial clinicopathological data and MRI findings were recorded. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Student's t-tests, while categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher's exact test. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine the associations between these variables and pathological complete response (pCR), defined as the absence of invasive malignant cells in the breast and lymph nodes. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed for associated non-mass enhancement (NME) parameter by analyzing 50 MR studies (intraclass correlation coefficient).

RESULTS

pCR was achieved in 67 patients, 51 (46 %) from Center 1 and 16 (23%) from Center 2 (p = 0.003), with significant differences between Centers 1 and 2 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels and lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001). The initial presence of suspicious associated NME was the only significant parameter predictive of pCR (p < 0.001 for Center 1 and 0.04 for Center 2). The inter-observer reproducibility for this MRI feature was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.73-1.00).

CONCLUSION

The presence of suspicious associated NME in HER2-positive cancers on the initial MRI study was predictive of achieving pCR after NST. This significant preliminary finding warrants confirmation through prospective multicenter studies.

Discriminative Factors of Malignancy of Ipsilateral Nonmass Enhancement in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer on Initial Staging Breast MRI

BACKGROUND

Nonmass enhancement (NME) on breast MRI impacts surgical planning.

PURPOSE

To evaluate positive predictive values (PPVs) and identify malignancy discriminators of NME ipsilateral to breast cancer on initial staging MRI.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-six women (median age, 48 years; range, 26-75 years) with 101 NME lesions (BI-RADS 4 and 5) ipsilateral to known cancers and confirmed histopathology.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 T and 3.0 T dynamic contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient-echo.

ASSESSMENT

Three radiologists blinded to pathology independently reviewed MRI features (distribution, internal enhancement pattern, and enhancement kinetics) of NME, locations relative to index cancers (contiguous, non-contiguous, and different quadrants), associated mammographic calcifications, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), axillary node metastasis, and radiology-pathology correlations. Clinical factors, NME features, and cancer characteristics were analyzed for associations with NME malignancy.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Fisher's exact, Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and mixed-effect multivariable logistic regression were used. Significance threshold was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall NME malignancy rate was 48.5% (49/101). Contiguous NME had a significantly higher malignancy rate (86.7%) than non-contiguous NME (25.0%) and NME in different quadrants (10.7%), but no significant difference was observed by distance from cancer for non-contiguous NME, P = 0.68. All calcified NME lesions contiguous to the calcified index cancer were malignant. NME was significantly more likely malignant when index cancers were masses compared to NME (52.9% vs. 21.4%), had mammographic calcifications (63.2% vs. 39.7%), LVI (81.8% vs. 44.4%), and axillary node metastasis (70.8% vs. 41.6%). NME features with highest PPVs were segmental distribution (85.7%), clumped enhancement (66.7%), and nonpersistent kinetics (77.1%). On multivariable analysis, contiguous NME, segmental distribution, and nonpersistent kinetics were associated with malignancy.

DATA CONCLUSION

Malignancy discriminators of ipsilateral NME on staging MRI included contiguous location to index cancers, segmental distribution, and nonpersistent kinetics.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Lesions with Non-Mass Enhancement on MR

Clustered ring enhancement (CRE) is a new lexicon for non-mass enhancement (NME) of breast MR in the 5th BIRADS, indicating a high suspicion of malignancy. We wonder if the presence of CRE correlates with expression of prognostic molecular biomarkers of breast cancer. A total of 58 breast lesions, which MRI reported with NME, were collected between July 2013 and December 2018. The patterns of enhancement including CRE were reviewed and the pathological results with expression of molecular biomarkers were collected. The association between MRI NME, pathological, and IHC stain findings were investigated under univariate analysis. A total of 58 breast lesions were pathologically proven to have breast cancer, comprising 31 lesions with CRE and 27 lesions without CRE on breast MRI. The expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) (p = 0.017) and the progesterone receptor (PR) (p = 0.017) was significantly lower in lesions with CRE as compared with those without CRE. The expression of Ki-67 (≥25%) was significantly higher in lesions with CRE (p = 0.046). The lesions with CRE had a lower expression ratio of ER (50.71 ± 45.39% vs. 74.26 ± 33.59%, p = 0.028). Our study indicated that lesions with CRE may possess different features from those without CRE in molecular expression, bearing a more aggressive behavior.

Evaluation of Features in Probably Benign and Malignant Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a highly sensitive breast imaging modality in detecting breast carcinoma. Nonmass enhancement (NME) is uniquely seen on MRI of the breast. The correlation between NME features and pathologic results has not been extensively explored. Our goal was to evaluate the characteristics of probably benign and suspicious NME lesions in MRI and determine which features are more associated with malignancy. We performed a retrospective research after approval by the hospital ethics committee on women who underwent breast MRI from March 2017 to March 2020 and identified 63 lesions of all 400 NME that were categorized as probably benign or suspicious according to the BI-RADS classification (version 2013). MRI features of NME findings including the location, size, distribution and enhancement pattern, kinetic curve, diffusion restriction, and also pathology result or 6-12-month follow-up MRI were evaluated and analyzed in each group (probably benign or suspicious NME). Vacuum-guided biopsies (VAB) were performed under mammographic or sonographic guidance and confirmed with MRI by visualization of the inserted clips. Segmental distribution and clustered ring internal enhancement were significantly associated with malignancy (p value<0.05), while linear distribution or homogeneous enhancement patterns were associated with benignity (p value <0.05). Additionally, the plateau and washout types in the dynamic curve were only seen in malignant lesions (p value <0.05). The presence of DWI restriction in NME lesions was also found to be a statistically important factor. Understanding the imaging findings of malignant NME is helpful to determine when biopsy is indicated. The correlation between NME features and pathologic results is critical in making appropriate management.

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Nonmass Enhancement Contiguous with Malignant Index Breast Cancer Masses at Preoperative Breast MRI

Purpose To determine the pathologic features of nonmass enhancement (NME) directly adjacent to biopsy-proven malignant masses (index masses) at preoperative MRI and determine imaging characteristics that are associated with a malignant pathologic condition. Materials and Methods This retrospective study involved the review of breast MRI and mammography examinations performed for evaluating disease extent in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer from July 1, 2016, to September 30, 2019. Inclusion criteria were limited to patients with an index mass and the presence of NME extending directly from the mass margins. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher exact test, and χ2 test were used to analyze cancer, patient, and imaging characteristics associated with the NME diagnosis. Results Fifty-eight patients (mean age, 58 years ± 12 [SD]; all women) were included. Malignant pathologic findings for mass-associated NME occurred in 64% (37 of 58) of patients, 43% (16 of 37) with ductal carcinoma in situ and 57% (21 of 37) with invasive carcinoma. NME was more likely to be malignant when associated with an index cancer that had a low Ki-67 index (<20%) (P = .04). The presence of calcifications at mammography correlating with mass-associated NME was not significantly associated with malignant pathologic conditions (P = .19). The span of suspicious enhancement measured at MRI overestimated the true span of disease at histologic evaluation (P < .001), while there was no evidence of a difference between span of calcifications at mammography and true span of disease at histologic evaluation (P = .27). Conclusion Mass-associated NME at preoperative MRI was malignant in most patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. The span of suspicious enhancement measured at MRI overestimated the true span of disease found at histologic evaluation. Keywords: Breast, Mammography © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Newell in this issue.

Using the Kaiser Score as a clinical decision rule for breast lesion classification: Does computer-assisted curve type analysis improve diagnosis?

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the effect of using visual or automatic enhancement curve type assessment on the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser Score (KS), a clinical decision rule for breast MRI.

METHOD

This IRB-approved retrospective study analyzed consecutive conventional BI-RADS 0, 4 or 5 patients who underwent biopsy after 1.5T breast MRI according to EUSOBI recommendations between 2013 and 2015. The KS includes five criteria (spiculations; signal intensity (SI)-time curve type; margins of the lesion; internal enhancement; and presence of edema) resulting in scores from 1 (=lowest) to 11 (=highest risk of breast cancer). Enhancement curve types (Persistent, Plateau or Wash-out) were assessed by two radiologists independently visually and using a pixel-wise color-coded computed parametric map of curve types. KS diagnostic performance differences between readings were compared by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

In total 220 lesions (147 benign, 73 malignant) including mass (n = 148) and non-mass lesions (n = 72) were analyzed. KS reading performance in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions did not differ between visual analysis and parametric map (P = 0.119; visual: AUC 0.875, sensitivity 95 %, specificity 63 %; and map: AUC 0.901, sensitivity 97 %, specificity 65 %). Additionally, analyzing mass and non-mass lesions separately, showed no difference between parametric map based and visual curve type-based KS analysis as well (P = 0.130 and P = 0.787).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the Kaiser Score is largely independent of the curve type assessment methodology, confirming its robustness as a clinical decision rule for breast MRI in any type of breast lesion in clinical routine.

Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67-positive expression in non-mass enhancement of breast cancer

As a remarkably specific characteristic of breast cancer observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the association between the NME type breast cancer and prognosis, including Ki-67, necessitates comprehensive exploration. To investigate the correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with Ki-67-positive expression in NME type breast cancer. A total of 63 NME type breast cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed. Malignancies were confirmed by surgical pathology. All patients underwent DCE and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before surgery. DCE-MRI characteristics, including tumor distribution, internal enhancement pattern, axillary adenopathy, and time-intensity curve types were observed. ADC values and lesion sizes were also measured. The correlation between these features and Ki-67 expression were assessed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Spearman rank analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Ki-67-positive expression. Regional distribution, TIC type, and ipsilateral axillary lymph node enlargement were correlated with Ki-67-positive expression (χ2 = 0.397, 0.357, and 0.357, respectively; P < 0.01). ADC value and lesion size were positively correlated with Ki-67-positive expression (rs = 0.295, 0.392; P < 0.05). The optimal threshold values for lesion size and ADC value to assess Ki-67 expression were determined to be 5.05 (AUC = 0.759) cm and 0.403 × 10-3 s/mm2 (AUC = 0.695), respectively. The best diagnosis performance was the ADC combined with lesion size (AUC = 0.791). The ADC value, lesion size, regional distribution, and TIC type in NME type breast cancer were correlated with Ki-67-positive expression. These features will aid diagnosis and treatment of NME type breast cancer.

Subcategorization of suspicious non-mass-like enhancement lesions(BI-RADS-MRI Category4)

BACKGROUND

This study aims to providing a reliable method that has good compliance and is easy to master to improve the accuracy of NMLE diagnosis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 122 cases of breast non-mass-like enhancement (NMLE) lesions confirmed by postoperative histology. MRI features and clinical features of benign and malignant non-mass enhancement breast lesions were compared by using independent sample t test, χ2test and Fisher exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistically significant parameters were then included in logistic regression analysis to build a multiparameter differential diagnosis modelto subdivide the BI-RADS Category 4.

RESULTS

The distribution (odds ratio (OR) = 8.70), internal enhancement pattern (OR = 6.29), ADC value (OR = 5.56), and vascular sign (OR = 2.84) of the lesions were closely related to the benignity and malignancy of the lesions. These signs were used to build the MRI multiparameter model for differentiating benign and malignant non-mass enhancement breast lesions. ROC analysis revealed that its optimal diagnostic cut-off value was 5. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity were 87.01% and 82.22%, respectively. Lesions with 1-6 points were considered BI-RADS category 4 lesions, and the positive predictive values of subtypes 4a, 4b, and 4c lesions were15.79%, 31.25%, and 77.78%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensively analyzing the features of MRI of non-mass enhancement breast lesions and building the multiparameter differential diagnosis model could improve the differential diagnostic performance of benign and malignant lesions.

Impact of Imaging Biomarkers and AI on Breast Cancer Management: A Brief Review

Breast cancer stands out as the most frequently identified malignancy, ranking as the fifth leading cause of global cancer-related deaths. The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) as a standard terminology facilitating communication between radiologists and clinicians; however, an update is now imperative to encompass the latest imaging modalities developed subsequent to the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Within this review article, we provide a concise history of BI-RADS, delve into advanced mammography techniques, ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PET/CT images, and microwave breast imaging, and subsequently furnish comprehensive, updated insights into Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI), diagnostic imaging biomarkers, and the assessment of treatment responses. This endeavor aims to enhance radiologists' proficiency in catering to the personalized needs of breast cancer patients. Lastly, we explore the augmented benefits of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) applications in segmenting, detecting, and diagnosing breast cancer, as well as the early prediction of the response of tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). By assimilating state-of-the-art computer algorithms capable of deciphering intricate imaging data and aiding radiologists in rendering precise and effective diagnoses, AI has profoundly revolutionized the landscape of breast cancer radiology. Its vast potential holds the promise of bolstering radiologists' capabilities and ameliorating patient outcomes in the realm of breast cancer management.

Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for MRI-only suspicious breast lesions: any added clinical value?

Background

Suspicious breast lesions [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 or 5] detected only by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and invisible on other initial imaging modalities (MRI-only lesions) are usually small and poorly characterized in previous literature, thus making diagnosis and management difficult. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics derived from conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on evaluating MRI-only lesions.

Methods

A total of 90 suspicious MRI-only lesions were evaluated, including 51 malignant and 39 benign lesions. Morphological and kinetic characteristics of all lesions (termed BI-RADS parameters) were described according to the BI-RADS lexicon on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. Minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values (ADCmin, ADCmax, ADCmean) were obtained by measuring the ADC map of DWI. ADCheterogeneity was then obtained by the following formula: ADCheterogeneity = (ADCmax - ADCmin)/ADCmean. Diagnostic performance of these parameters was assessed and compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

Of the 90 MRI-only lesions, there were 45 masses and 45 non-mass lesions. Among BI-RADS parameters, only two different kinetic patterns were significantly different between benign and malignant groups (P=0.005 and P<0.001, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of combined significant ADC parameters (ADCmin, ADCmean, and ADCmax, all P≤0.001) was significantly higher than that of the two different kinetic patterns (P=0.006 for both). For MRI-only masses, only ADCmean and ADCmax, among all BI-RADS and ADC parameters, had diagnostic value (combined AUC =0.833). For non-mass lesions, size, distribution, ADCmin, and ADCmean were significantly different between benign and malignant groups (P=0.004, P<0.001, P=0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). In addition, ADCmean had the highest diagnostic performance among all ADC parameters, regardless of mass or non-mass (AUC =0.825 and 0.812, respectively). ADCheterogeneity showed no significant differences, no matter in mass or non-mass groups (P=0.62 and 0.43, respectively).

Conclusions

In differentiating MRI-only suspicious lesions, quantitative ADC metrics generally performed better than BI-RADS parameters, and ADCmean is still the best ADC parameter to distinguish MRI-only lesions.

Contrasts Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR in Diagnosing Malignancies of Breast Nonmass Enhancement Lesions Based on Morphologic Assessment

BACKGROUND

Nonmass enhancement (NME) breast lesions are considered to be the leading cause of unnecessary biopsies. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences are typically used to differentiate between benign and malignant NMEs. It is important to know which one is more effective and reliable.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of DCE curves and DWI in discriminating benign and malignant NME lesions on the basis of morphologic characteristics assessment on contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI images.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 180 patients with 184 lesions in the training cohort and 75 patients with 77 lesions in the validation cohort with pathological results.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T/multi-b-value DWI (b values = 0, 50, 1000, and 2000 sec/mm2 ) and time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories and volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (TWIST-VIBE) sequence.

ASSESSMENT

In the training cohort, a diagnostic model for morphology based on the distribution and internal enhancement characteristics was first constructed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model (ADC + morphology) and the time-intensity curves (TIC) model (TIC + morphology) were then established using binary logistic regression with pathological results as the reference standard. Both models were compared for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) in the training and the validation cohort.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and two-sample t-tests/Mann-Whitney U-test/Chi-square test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For the TIC/ADC model in the training cohort, sensitivities were 0.924/0.814, specificities were 0.615/0.615, and AUCs were 0.811 (95%, 0.727, 0.894)/0.769 (95%, 0.681, 0.856). The AUC of the TIC-ADC combined model was significantly higher than ADC model alone, while comparable with the TIC model (P = 0.494). In the validation cohort, the AUCs of TIC/ADC model were 0.799/0.635.

DATA CONCLUSION

Based on the morphologic analyses, the performance of the TIC model was found to be superior than the ADC model for differentiating between benign and malignant NME lesions.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

Ultrasound diagnosis of non-mass MRI-detected lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lesions are often category 2 or 3 lesions on initial ultrasound examination. In addition, in the case of new non-mass lesions detected on MRI, one would expect to find lesions with ductal dilatation with minimal secretory accumulation, single short lesions with ductal dilatation, cyst-like lesions less than 5 mm in size, mammary gland-like lesions less than 8 mm in size, and very indistinct lesions. Detection is expected to be even more difficult. Currently, there are no clear uniform criteria for the indication of second-look ultrasonography (US) for MRI-detected lesions, so it is not possible to make a general comparison, but recent studies have indicated that the ratio of mass to non-mass MRI-detected lesions is 7:3. And it has been pointed out that the percentage of malignancy is about 30% for each. Before about 2012, the US detection rate was about 70%, and MRI-guided biopsies of undetected lesions showed a small percentage of malignant lesions. Therefore, some observers believe that lesions not detected on US should be followed up, while others believe that MRI-guided biopsy should be performed. Recently, however, the use of surrounding anatomical structures as landmarks for second-look US has increased the detection rate to as high as 87-99%, and the percentage of malignancy remains the same. In addition, recent surveillance of high-risk breast cancer requires careful management of MRI-detected lesions. In this review, we will discuss the literature on MRI-detected lesions and describe ultrasound techniques to accurately detect small lesions and reliably reveal pale lesions based on their structural differences from their surroundings.

Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of non-mass enhancement of the breast

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) classifies lesions as mass, non-mass enhancement (NME), or focus. BI-RADS ultrasound does not currently have the concept of non-mass. Additionally, knowing the concept of NME in MRI is significant. Thus, this study aimed to provide a narrative review of NME diagnosis in breast MRI. Lexicons are defined with distribution (focal, linear, segmental, regional, multiple regions, and diffuse) and internal enhancement patterns (homogenous, heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered ring) in the case of NME. Among these, linear, segmental, clumped, clustered ring, and heterogeneous are the terms that suggest malignancy. Hence, a hand search was conducted for reports of malignancy frequencies. The malignancy frequency in NME is widely distributed, ranging from 25 to 83.6%, and the frequency of each finding varies. Latest techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging and ultrafast dynamic MRI, are attempted to differentiate NME. Additionally, attempts are made in the preoperative setting to determine the concordance of lesion spread based on findings and the presence of invasion.

Breast MRI: an illustration of benign findings

Despite its unparalleled sensitivity for aggressive breast cancer, breast MRI continually excites criticism for a specificity that lags behind that of modern mammographic techniques. Radiologists reporting breast MRI need to recognise the range of benign appearances on breast MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy. This review summarises the reported diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI with particular attention to the technique's specificity, provides a referenced reporting strategy and discusses factors that compromise diagnostic confidence. We then present a pictorial review of benign findings on breast MRI. Enhancing radiological skills to discriminate malignant from benign findings will minimise false positive biopsies, enabling optimal use of multiparametric breast MRI for the benefit of screening clients and breast cancer patients.

PPV of the Molecular Breast Imaging Lexicon

BACKGROUND. Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is used for various breast imaging indications. An MBI lexicon has been developed, although the likelihood of malignancy of the lexicon descriptors has not been assessed to our knowledge. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the PPV for malignancy of the MBI lexicon imaging descriptors. METHODS. This retrospective study included MBI examinations performed from August 1, 2005, through August 31, 2017, that were positive (BI-RADS analogous categories 0, 3, 4, 5, or 6) according to the clinical report and had an available reference standard. Examinations were performed using dual-detector cadmium zinc telluride MBI systems after injection of 99mTc sestamibi. Category 3 lesions had pathologic correlation, at least 2 years of imaging follow-up, or final resolution on follow-up imaging as category 1 or 2; category 4 and 5 lesions had pathologic correlation. MBI examinations were reviewed by one of two radiologists to assess lesions on the basis of the published MBI lexicon for type (mass vs nonmass uptake), distribution (if nonmass uptake), uptake intensity, and number of MBI views on which the lesion was seen. PPV for malignancy was summarized. RESULTS. The analysis included 643 lesions (479 benign, 164 malignant; 83 mass, 560 nonmass uptake) in 509 patients (median age, 56 years). PPV was 73.5% (61/83) for masses and 18.4% (103/560) for nonmass uptake. Among the nonmass uptake lesions, PPV was 36.2% (17/47) for segmental, 20.1% (77/384) for focal, 30.8% (4/13) for diffuse, and 4.3% (5/116) for regional or multiple regional distribution. PPV was 5.3% (5/94) for one view, 15.2% (32/210) for two views, 14.6% (13/89) for three views, and 45.4% (113/249) for four views showing the lesion. PPV was 14.0% (43/307) for mild, 22.4% (51/228) for moderate, and 64.8% (70/108) for marked uptake intensity. CONCLUSION. The MBI lexicon lesion descriptors are associated with likelihood of malignancy. PPV was higher for masses, lesions seen on multiple MBI views, and lesions with marked uptake intensity. Among nonmass uptake lesions, PPV was highest for those with segmental distribution. CLINICAL IMPACT. Insight into the likelihood of malignancy associated with the MBI lexicon descriptors can inform radiologists' interpretations and guide potential future incorporation of the MBI lexicon into the ACR BI-RADS Atlas.

Breast MRI: does a clinical decision algorithm outweigh reader experience?

Objectives

Due to its high sensitivity, DCE MRI of the breast (MRIb) is increasingly used for both screening and assessment purposes. The Kaiser score (KS) is a clinical decision algorithm, which formalizes and guides diagnosis in breast MRI and is expected to compensate for lesser reader experience. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of untrained residents using the KS compared to off-site radiologists experienced in breast imaging using only MR BI-RADS.

Methods

Three off-site, board-certified radiologists, experienced in breast imaging, interpreted MRIb according to the MR BI-RADS scale. The same studies were read by three residents in radiology without prior training in breast imaging using the KS. All readers were blinded to clinical information. Histology was used as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was conducted by comparing the AUC of the ROC curves.

Results

A total of 80 women (median age 52 years) with 93 lesions (32 benign, 61 malignant) were included. The individual within-group performance of the three expert readers (AUC 0.723–0.742) as well as the three residents was equal (AUC 0.842–0.928), p > 0.05, respectively. But, the rating of each resident using the KS significantly outperformed the experts’ ratings using the MR BI-RADS scale (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion

The KS helped residents to achieve better results in reaching correct diagnoses than experienced radiologists empirically assigning MR BI-RADS categories in a clinical “problem solving MRI” setting. These results support that reporting breast MRI benefits more from using a diagnostic algorithm rather than expert experience.

Key Points

• Reporting breast MRI benefits more from using a diagnostic algorithm rather than expert experience in a clinical “problem solving MRI” setting.

• The Kaiser score, which provides a clinical decision algorithm for structured reporting, helps residents to reach an expert level in breast MRI reporting and to even outperform experienced radiologists using MR BI-RADS without further formal guidance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09015-8.

A simplified scoring protocol to improve diagnostic accuracy with the breast imaging reporting and data system in breast magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon provides a standardized terminology for describing leision characteristics but does not provide defined rules for converting specific imaging features into diagnostic categories. The inter-reader agreement of the BI-RADS is moderate. In this study, we explored the use of a simplified protocol and scoring system for BI-RADS categorization which integrates the morphologic features (MF), kinetic time-intensity curve (TIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with equal weights, with a view to providing a convenient and practical method for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and improving the inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of BI-RADS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, retrospective, single-center study included 879 patients with 898 histopathologically verified lesions who underwent an MRI scan on a 3.0 Tesla GE Discovery 750 MRI scanner between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020. The BI-RADS categorization of the studied lesions was assessed according to the sum of the assigned scores (the presence of malignant MF, lower ADC, and suspicious TIC each warranted a score of +1). Total scores of +2 and +3 were classified as category 5, scores of +1 were classified as category 4, and scores of +0 but with other lesions of interest were classified as category 3. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this categorization were investigated to assess its efficacy and its consistency with pathology.

RESULTS

There were 472 malignant, 104 risk, and 322 benign lesions. Our simplified scoring protocol had high diagnostic accuracy, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.896. In terms of the borderline effect of pathological risk and category 4 lesions, our results showed that when risk lesions were classified together with malignant ones, the AUC value improved (0.876 vs. 0.844 and 0.909 vs. 0.900). When category 4 and 5 lesions were classified as malignant, the specificity, accuracy, and AUC value decreased (82.3% vs. 93.2%, 89.3% vs. 90.2%, and 0.876 vs. 0.909, respectively). Therefore, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the protocol for BI-RADS categorization, only category 5 lesions should be considered to be malignant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our simplified scoring protocol that integrates MF, TIC, and ADC values with equal weights for BI-RADS categorization could improve both the diagnostic performance of the protocol for BI-RADS categorization in clinical practice and the understanding of the benign-risk-malignant breast diseases.

Management of Non-Mass Enhancement at Breast Magnetic Resonance in Screening Settings Referred for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsy

Rationale and Objectives

According to the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS), one of the main limitations of MRI is diagnosing the non-mass enhancement (NME). The NME lesion is challenging since it is unique to the MRI lexicon. This study aims to report our experience with NME lesions diagnosed by MRI referred for MRI-guided biopsies and discuss the management and follow-up of these lesions.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated all MRI-guide breast biopsies. We included all patients referred for NME breast MRI-guided biopsy in screening settings. All patients had a negative second-look mammography or ultrasonography. We correlated the distribution and internal enhancement pattern (IEP) of the NME lesions with histology. Invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of no special type and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were considered malignant lesions.

Results

From January-2018 to July-2021, we included 96 women with a total of 96 lesions in the study. There were 90 benign and 6 malignant lesions with DCIS prevalence (5/6 cancers). The most frequent benign lesion type was fibrocystic changes. There were no NME lesions with diffuse or multiple area distribution features referred to MRI-guided biopsy. The positive-predictive values (PPV) were respectively 0.0%, 2.5%, 9.0%, and 11.0% for linear, focal, regional, and segmental distribution describers, and 0.0, 3.0%, 7.9%, and 50% for homogenous, heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered-ring enhancement patterns.

Conclusion

We observe the high potential risk for malignancy in the clustered-ring enhancement followed by the clumped pattern. Segmental distribution presented the highest predictive-positive values.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging findings that affect the magnetic resonance-directed ultrasound correlation of non-mass enhancement lesions: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Our single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relationship between magnetic resonance (MR)-directed ultrasound (MDUS) detectability and MRI findings of non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions, regarding the morphologic and enhancement features, the distance from the skin and nipple, and the presence of concomitant landmarks.

METHODS

A total of 350 MRI-detected NME lesions that were determined between January 2015 and May 2019 and subsequently underwent MDUS were analyzed. The MRI findings, biopsy results, and follow-up outcomes of lesions were recorded. The correlation between the MRI findings of the lesions and MDUS detectability was analyzed.

RESULTS

114 (32.6%) of the 350 lesions had a counterpart in the MDUS. Respectively, 66 (37.9%), 38 (43.2%) and 59 (38.3%) of the lesions detected in MDUS were larger than 20 mm in size, with a distance of less than 20 mm to the nipple and 15 mm to the skin. The lesion size and lesion distance to the nipple and skin were significantly associated with a ultrasound correlate (p < 0.05). The MDUS detection rate was significantly higher in NME lesions with MR findings including diffuse distribution (p < 0.001), clustered-ring enhancement pattern (p < 0.001), washout kinetic curve (p = 0.006), and MR-BIRADS category 5 (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that only the clustered-ring enhancement pattern was significantly associated with an MDUS correlation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant correlations were found between the size, distance to the nipple and skin, distribution pattern, enhancement pattern and kinetic curve of the NME lesions on MRI and ultrasound detectability.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

We found that clustered-ring enhancement patterns were significantly more frequent in MR-directed ultrasound detectable lesions.

An artificial intelligence system using maximum intensity projection MR images facilitates classification of non-mass enhancement breast lesions

OBJECTIVES

To build an artificial intelligence (AI) system to classify benign and malignant non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions using maximum intensity projection (MIP) of early post-contrast subtracted breast MR images.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected 965 pure NME lesions (539 benign and 426 malignant) confirmed by histopathology or follow-up in 903 women. The 754 NME lesions acquired by one MR scanner were randomly split into the training set, validation set, and test set A (482/121/151 lesions). The 211 NME lesions acquired by another MR scanner were used as test set B. The AI system was developed using ResNet-50 with the axial and sagittal MIP images. One senior and one junior radiologist reviewed the MIP images of each case independently and rated its Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category. The performance of the AI system and the radiologists was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The AI system yielded AUCs of 0.859 and 0.816 in the test sets A and B, respectively. The AI system achieved comparable performance as the senior radiologist (p = 0.558, p = 0.041) and outperformed the junior radiologist (p < 0.001, p = 0.009) in both test sets A and B. After AI assistance, the AUC of the junior radiologist increased from 0.740 to 0.862 in test set A (p < 0.001) and from 0.732 to 0.843 in test set B (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our MIP-based AI system yielded good applicability in classifying NME lesions in breast MRI and can assist the junior radiologist achieve better performance.

KEY POINTS

• Our MIP-based AI system yielded good applicability in the dataset both from the same and a different MR scanner in predicting malignant NME lesions. • The AI system achieved comparable diagnostic performance with the senior radiologist and outperformed the junior radiologist. • This AI system can assist the junior radiologist achieve better performance in the classification of NME lesions in MRI.

Non-mass enhancement breast lesions: MRI findings and associations with malignancy

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a multi-sequence imaging technique. Although MRI is the most sensitive method for detecting breast cancer, it is limited in evaluating the malignant possibility of non-mass enhanced (NME) breast lesions. It is also rarely reported whether MRI can further indicate the invasion of the lesions. In this article, we explore the differentiation of MRI characteristics between benign and malignant NME lesions and determine which features are associated with invasion.

Methods

The MRI findings of 118 NME lesions were evaluated retrospectively to explore the characteristics of the benign and malignant NME lesions in different MRI sequences including dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The difference of MRI findings between benign and malignant NME lesions were determined by Pearson χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, and the diagnostic value of features for malignancy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

This study included 118 NME lesions (62 benign and 56 malignant) in 118 patients. We found a segmental distribution, clustered-ring enhancement, wash-out dynamic curve, and lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (P=0.01, <0.001, 0.02, 0.001) were associated with malignancy. Wash-out dynamic curves, diffusion restriction on DWI, lower ADC values were more advantageous in distinguishing invasive NME cancer from benign lesions than ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.027). Further analysis showed that there were statistical differences between invasive carcinoma and carcinoma in situ in terms of wash-out dynamic curves, diffusion restriction on DWI and lower ADC values (P=0.001, 0.014, 0.024).

Conclusions

MRI is a valuable way to identify malignant NME lesions and could predict the invasion of the lesions. Compared with carcinoma in situ, some sequences have more advantages in distinguishing invasive carcinoma from benign lesions.

Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Radiomics Models Built Based on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Combined With Mammography

Objective

To build radiomics models using features extracted from DCE-MRI and mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

266 patients receiving MRI and mammography, who had well-enhanced lesions on MRI and histologically confirmed diagnosis were analyzed. Training dataset had 146 malignant and 56 benign, and testing dataset had 48 malignant and 18 benign lesions. Fuzzy-C-means clustering algorithm was used to segment the enhanced lesion on subtraction MRI maps. Two radiologists manually outlined the corresponding lesion on mammography by consensus, with the guidance of MRI maximum intensity projection. Features were extracted using PyRadiomics from three DCE-MRI parametric maps, and from the lesion and a 2-cm bandshell margin on mammography. The support vector machine (SVM) was applied for feature selection and model building, using 5 datasets: DCE-MRI, mammography lesion-ROI, mammography margin-ROI, mammography lesion+margin, and all combined.

Results

In the training dataset evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, the diagnostic accuracy of the individual model was 83.2% for DCE-MRI, 75.7% for mammography lesion, 64.4% for mammography margin, and 77.2% for lesion+margin. When all features were combined, the accuracy was improved to 89.6%. By adding mammography features to MRI, the specificity was significantly improved from 69.6% (39/56) to 82.1% (46/56), p<0.01. When the developed models were applied to the independent testing dataset, the accuracy was 78.8% for DCE-MRI and 83.3% for combined MRI+Mammography.

Conclusion

The radiomics model built from the combined MRI and mammography has the potential to provide a machine learning-based diagnostic tool and decrease the false positive diagnosis of contrast-enhanced benign lesions on MRI.

BI-RADS Reading of Non-Mass Lesions on DCE-MRI and Differential Diagnosis Performed by Radiomics and Deep Learning

Background

A wide variety of benign and malignant processes can manifest as non-mass enhancement (NME) in breast MRI. Compared to mass lesions, there are no distinct features that can be used for differential diagnosis. The purpose is to use the BI-RADS descriptors and models developed using radiomics and deep learning to distinguish benign from malignant NME lesions.

Materials and Methods

A total of 150 patients with 104 malignant and 46 benign NME were analyzed. Three radiologists performed reading for morphological distribution and internal enhancement using the 5th BI-RADS lexicon. For each case, the 3D tumor mask was generated using Fuzzy-C-Means segmentation. Three DCE parametric maps related to wash-in, maximum, and wash-out were generated, and PyRadiomics was applied to extract features. The radiomics model was built using five machine learning algorithms. ResNet50 was implemented using three parametric maps as input. Approximately 70% of earlier cases were used for training, and 30% of later cases were held out for testing.

Results

The diagnostic BI-RADS in the original MRI report showed that 104/104 malignant and 36/46 benign lesions had a BI-RADS score of 4A–5. For category reading, the kappa coefficient was 0.83 for morphological distribution (excellent) and 0.52 for internal enhancement (moderate). Segmental and Regional distribution were the most prominent for the malignant group, and focal distribution for the benign group. Eight radiomics features were selected by support vector machine (SVM). Among the five machine learning algorithms, SVM yielded the highest accuracy of 80.4% in training and 77.5% in testing datasets. ResNet50 had a better diagnostic performance, 91.5% in training and 83.3% in testing datasets.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of NME was challenging, and the BI-RADS scores and descriptors showed a substantial overlap. Radiomics and deep learning may provide a useful CAD tool to aid in diagnosis.

Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy Between Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and DCE-MRI for Mass- and Non-Mass-Like Enhancement Types in Breast Lesions

Background

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can provide angiogenesis information about breast lesions; however, its diagnostic performance in comparison with that of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and DCE-MRI in mass-like and non-mass-like enhancement types of breast lesions.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 252 patients with breast lesions who underwent CEUS and DCE-MRI before surgery between January 2016 and February 2020. Histopathological results were used as reference standards. All patients were classified into mass-like and non-mass-like enhancement lesion groups. The mass-like lesion group was further divided into three categories according to different sizes (group 1: <10 mm, group 2: 10-20 mm, and group 3: >20 mm). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed to assess the diagnostic performance of these two modalities.

Results

For mass-like breast lesions, DCE-MRI (Az=0.981) manifested better diagnostic performance than CEUS (Az=0.940) in medium-sized (10-20 mm) tumors (Z=2.018, P=0.043), but both had similar diagnostic performance in smaller (<10 mm) and larger (>20 mm) tumors (P=0.717, P=0.394). For non-mass-like enhancement lesions, CEUS and DCE-MRI showed no significant difference (Z=1.590, P=0.119) and revealed good diagnostic performance (Az=0.859, Az=0.947) in differentiating the two groups.

Conclusion

For mass-like breast lesions, DCE-MRI showed better diagnostic performance than CEUS in differentiating benign and malignant tumors of medium-sizes (10-20mm) but not of smaller (<10mm) and larger (>20 mm) sizes. For non-mass-like lesions, both modalities showed similar diagnostic performance.

Influence of residual fat signal on diffusion kurtosis MRI of suspicious mammography findings

Recent studies showed the potential of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) as a tool for improved classification of suspicious breast lesions. However, in diffusion-weighted imaging of the female breast, sufficient fat suppression is one of the main factors determining the success. In this study, the data of 198 patients examined in two study centres was analysed using standard diffusion and kurtosis evaluation methods and three DKI fitting approaches accounting phenomenologically for fat-related signal contamination of the lesions. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) for the method including fat correction terms (AUC = 0.85, p < 0.015) in comparison to the values obtained with the standard diffusion (AUC = 0.77) and kurtosis approach (AUC = 0.79). Comparing the two study centres, the AUC value improved from 0.77 to 0.86 (p = 0.036) using a fat correction term for the first centre, while no significant difference with no adverse effects was observed for the second centre (AUC 0.89 vs. 0.90, p = 0.95). Contamination of the signal in breast lesions with unsuppressed fat causing a reduction of diagnostic performance of diffusion kurtosis imaging may potentially be counteracted by proposed adapted evaluation methods.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings associated with resection margin status in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) who underwent breast-conserving surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and one patients with ILC who underwent preoperative MRI were included. MRI (tumor size, multifocality, type of enhancing lesion, distribution of non-mass enhancement [NME], and degree of background parenchymal enhancement) and clinicopathological features (age, pathologic tumor size, presence of ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] or lobular carcinoma in situ, presence of lymph node metastases, and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 status) were analyzed. A positive resection margin was defined as the presence of invasive cancer or DCIS at the inked surface. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine pre- and postoperative variables associated with positive resection margins.

RESULTS

Among the 101 patients, 21 (20.8%) showed positive resection margins. In the univariable analysis, NME, multifocality, axillary lymph node metastasis, and pathologic tumor size were associated with positive resection margins. With respect to preoperative MRI findings, multifocality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.977, p = 0.009) and NME (OR = 2.741, p = 0.063) were associated with positive resection margins in the multivariable analysis, although NME showed borderline significance.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ILC, multifocality and the presence of NME on preoperative breast MRI were associated with positive resection margins.