Portable ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound with functions for safe and rapid ablation: prospective clinical trial for uterine fibroids—short-term and long-term results

Combination of HIFU with sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in the treatment of solitary uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles on ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of uterine fibroids.

METHODS

Studies that compared HIFU-microbubble combination with HIFU-only in patients with uterine fibroids were searched from inception to April 2022. The standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for different outcome parameters was calculated.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included, with a total of 901 patients (519 in the combination group and 382 in the HIFU-only group). The energy consumption for treating 1 cm3 of the lesion in the combination group was less than that in the HIFU-only group [SMD =  - 2.19, 95%CI (- 3.81, - 0.57), p = 0.008]. The use of microbubbles was associated with shortening the duration of the treatment and sonication [SMD =  - 2.60, 95%CI (- 4.09, - 1.10), p = 0.0007; SMD =  - 2.11, 95%CI (- 3.30, - 0.92), p = 0.0005]. The rates of significant greyscale changes during HIFU were greater in the combination group, as well as the increase of non-perfused volume ratio [RR = 1.26, 95%CI (1.04, 1.54), p = 0.02; SMD = 0.32, 95%CI (0.03, 0.61), p = 0.03]. The average sonication durations to reach significant greyscale changes and for ablating 1 cm3 of the fibroid lesion were shorter in the combination group [SMD =  - 1.24, 95%CI (- 2.02, - 0.45), p = 0.002; SMD =  - 0.22, 95%CI (- 0.42, - 0.02), p = 0.03]. The two groups had similar post-HIFU adverse effects, while the combination group had fewer intraprocedural adverse events like abdominal pain, sacrum pain, and leg pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles can be safely used to enhance and accelerate the ablation effects of HIFU in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The combination of HIFU with sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles offers a promising non-invasive treatment option for patients with uterine fibroids.

KEY POINTS

• Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles combined with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) has potential advantages in the treatment of uterine fibroids. • Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles not only enhance the effects of USgHIFU treatment for uterine fibroids but also shorten its duration. • Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles do not increase the incidence of USgHIFU-related adverse events in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

Long-term Efficacy of Fibroid Devascularization with Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been increasingly used for treatment of uterine leiomyoma. The superiority of HIFU therapy targeting uterine leiomyoma blood vessels, however, still needs to be further explored. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of fibroid devascularization with ultrasound-guided HIFU (USgHIFU) and the effects of treatment on the ovarian reserve and endometrial injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fibroid devascularization was assessed with the Adler grade obtained by color Doppler flow imaging and power Doppler imaging (PDI). The targeted vessels were covered and then sonicated by HIFU focal spots. The patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after treatment. Adverse effects and complications were recorded. The non-perfusion volume rate (NPVR), fibroid volume shrinkage rate (FVSR), Adler Grade, symptom severity score (SSS) and uterine fibroid symptom and quality of life (UFS-QOL) were evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. In Center 1, the enrolled patients completed the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) test before and at 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 117 eligible patients were consecutively enrolled to receive interventions and follow-up evaluations of the three centers from January 2019 to May 2023. The 1-month and 6-month NPVRs were 66.60% ± 33.14% and 51.12% ± 39.84%, respectively. The mean FVSRs at 1 month and 6 months after treatment were 38.20% and 43.89%, respectively. No significant difference was observed in AMH levels before and after treatment (p > 0.05). No irreversible endometrial injury was observed in MR images after HIFU treatment. No significant difference was observed in both 1-month and 6-month FVSRs among Center 1, 2 and 3 (p > 0.05). No severe AEs occurred. For long-term outcomes, significant differences were observed in Adler grade, FV, FVSR, SSS, reduction in SSS and UFS-QOL before and after treatment (p < 0.001) whereas no significant difference was observed in Adler grade among 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after treatment (p > 0.05). The SSSs were reduced by 33.42% at 1 year, 42.32% at 2 years and 52.46% at 3 years after treatment.

CONCLUSION

For patients with uterine fibroids, USgHIFU-induced devascularization is a safe and effective treatment option. It has little effect on ovarian function and the endometrial injury is reversible, which could be attractive for patients who plan to become pregnant.

Optimized treatment parameter by computer simulation for high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of uterine adenomyosis: Short-term and long-term results

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of using optimized parameters obtained by computer simulation for ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of uterine adenomyosis in comparison with conventional parameters. We retrospectively assessed a single-institution, prospective study that was registered at Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS) of Republic of Korea (KCT0003586). Sixty-six female participants (median age: 44 years) with focal uterine adenomyosis were prospectively enrolled. All participants were treated with a HIFU system by using treatment parameters either for treating uterine fibroids (Group A, first 20 participants) or obtained via computer simulation (Group B, later 46 participants). To assess the treatment efficacy of HIFU, qualitative indices, including the clinically effective dysmenorrhea improvement index (DII), were evaluated up to 3 years after treatment, whereas quantitative indices, such as the nonperfused volume ratio and adenomyosis volume shrinkage ratio (AVSR), on MRI were evaluated up to 3 months after treatment. Quantitative/qualitative indices were compared between Groups A and B by using generalized linear mixed effect model. A safety assessment was also performed. Results showed that clinically effective DII was more frequently observed in Group B than in Group A (odds ratio, 3.69; P = 0.025), and AVSR were higher in Group B than in Group A (least-squares means, 21.61; P = 0.001). However, two participants in Group B developed skin burns at the buttock and sciatic nerve pain and required treatment. In conclusion, parameters obtained by computer simulation were more effective than the conventional parameters for treating uterine adenomyosis by using HIFU in terms of clinically effective DII and AVSR. However, care should be taken because of the risk of adverse events.

Hysteroscopic diode laser myolysis: from a case series to literature review of incisionless myolysis techniques for managing heavy menstrual bleeding in premenopausal women

PURPOSE

This case series examined the safety and effectiveness of hysteroscopic myolysis using laser-induced interstitial thermo-therapy (LITT) for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women with FIGO type 1 or 2 uterine fibroids, not planning for future fertility. Additionally, a comprehensive review of innovative, minimally invasive, incisionless myolysis techniques was conducted.

METHODS

Women with HMB, sonographically diagnosed with a single FIGO type 1 or 2 fibroid, underwent hysteroscopic myolysis using the Leonardo® diode laser. Effectiveness was assessed via transvaginal ultrasound measurement of myoma size, volume and vascularization pre and post-procedure. Moreover, we also evaluated any improvements in symptoms using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC score) scores.

RESULTS

The procedure resulted in significant HMB reductions and noticeable fibroid size, volume, and vascularization decrease in all three patients, with no reported complications. The literature review revealed both advantages and limitations of the minimally invasive, incisionless myolysis techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic laser myolysis is a safe and effective therapeutic intervention for patients experiencing HMB, diagnosed with FIGO type 1 or 2 fibroids, and not planning for future fertility. The procedure resulted in significant reductions in menstrual blood loss and fibroid size. Despite the promising results, it is essential to note the limitations of this report, including its case series design, a small number of patients, and a short follow-up period. Further research is necessary to confirm these results.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids: A Review

Leiomyomas, or uterine fibroids, are growths consisting of muscle and tissue that develop in or on the uterine wall. The most frequent benign uterine tumours in women of reproductive age are thought to be fibroids. Dysmenorrhea, spotting, hypermenorrhoea, abdominal pain, pressure on surrounding organs, and issues with micturition and defecation are among the symptoms that are often present. Fibroids can form as a single nodule or as a cluster. Uterine fibroids, especially large submucosal and intramural uterine fibroids, can cause obstacles to implantation and lead to pregnancy loss. Uterine fibroids can be treated without surgery and with little downtime using focused ultrasound. There is published research showing that women can conceive and have healthy children after therapy, thus protecting fertility. The ablation of uterine fibroids by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is successful since the volume of the fibroids is significantly reduced.

Changes in Pelvic Floor Symptoms After Procedural Interventions for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the effect of procedural interventions for leiomyomas on pelvic floor symptoms.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to January 12, 2023, searching for leiomyoma procedures and pelvic floor disorders and symptoms, restricted to primary study designs in humans.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Double independent screening for studies of any study design in all languages that reported pelvic floor symptoms before and after surgical (hysterectomy, myomectomy, radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation) or radiologic (uterine artery embolization, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography, high-intensity focused ultrasonography) procedures for management of uterine leiomyomas. Data were extracted, with risk-of-bias assessment and review by a second researcher. Random effects model meta-analyses were conducted, as feasible.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials, one nonrandomized comparative study, and 25 single-group studies met criteria. The overall quality of the studies was moderate. Only six studies, reporting various outcomes, directly compared two procedures for leiomyomas. Across studies, leiomyoma procedures were associated with decreased symptom distress per the UDI-6 (Urinary Distress Inventory, Short Form) (summary mean change -18.7, 95% CI -25.9 to -11.5; six studies) and improved quality of life per the IIQ-7 (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form) (summary mean change -10.7, 95% CI -15.8 to -5.6; six studies). There was a wide range of resolution of urinary symptoms after procedural interventions (7.6-100%), and this varied over time. Urinary symptoms improved in 19.0-87.5% of patients, and the definitions for improvement varied between studies. Bowel symptoms were inconsistently reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Urinary symptoms improved after procedural interventions for uterine leiomyomas, although there is high heterogeneity among studies and few data on long-term outcomes or comparing different procedures.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021272678.

High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of fibroids: A single-center experience in Singapore

Objectives

Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis are common gynecological conditions that often require surgical treatment. Minimally invasive interventions such as ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) are gaining popularity as they avoid surgical morbidity and conserve the uterus. We present a single-center experience on the use of USgHIFU for the treatment of fibroids and adenomyosis.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study of 167 patients who underwent USgHIFU for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis between July 2018 and December 2020. Relevant demographic data and pre- and post-intervention fibroid volume, symptom severity scores (SSS), and health-related quality of life (QOL) scores were collected and compared. The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference before and after treatment. P < 0.001 was considered statistically significant.

Results

One hundred and sixty-seven patients with fibroids or adenomyosis were included in this study. The mean age of the cohort was 42-year-old. USgHIFU treatment led to a reduction in mean fibroid volume, improvement in SSS, and health-related QOL scores. The average reduction in mean fibroid volume was 68% and 75% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There was a significant reduction in SSS (46.9 [pre] vs. 15.6 [post], P < 0.001) and improvement in health-related QOL scores at 6 months (58 [pre] vs. 86 [post], P < 0.001). The re-intervention rate following USgHIFU was 7.7% and successful pregnancy post USgHIFU was reported in 6 patients.

Conclusion

USgHIFU is safe and effective. In women who desire fertility or are not suitable for surgery, it is a good alternative option. It should be included in the armamentarium for the treatment of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for a Single Uterine Fibroid Greater than 300 cm3

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for a single uterine fibroid greater than 300 cm³.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, China.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients each with a single fibroid greater than 300 cm³ diagnosed by ultrasound and core needle biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 12 months postoperatively to assess the postoperative lesion volume reduction rate, degree of symptomatic relief, improvements in quality of life, and occurrence of adverse events. All 37 patients met the criteria for complete ablation, and the lesion volume significantly decreased from 334.28 cm³ (95% confidence interval [CI] 326.75-366.73) preoperatively to 52.01 cm³ (95% CI, 46.95-74.69) at the 12-month follow-up (difference: 280.15 cm³; 95% CI, 267.92-294.65; p <.001). The lesion volume reduction rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were 27.30% (95% CI, 24.12-31.45), 52.90% (95% CI, 47.95-55.80), 67.90% (95% CI, 63.03-70.77), and 84.00% (95% CI, 80.22-85.94), respectively. The differences in the preoperative and postoperative Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were significant (p <.01). The hemoglobin levels of the anemic patients were significantly elevated after the procedure (p <.001). Of the 37 patients in this study, 29 patients (78.38%) had a highly significant treatment effect, and 8 patients (21.62%) had a significant treatment effect. Seventeen patients (45.95%) had Society of Interventional Radiology grade A to B adverse effects that required no clinical intervention or only simple clinical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA has good clinical efficacy and high safety in the treatment of a single uterine fibroid greater than 300 cm³.

Minimally invasive treatment of cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism with high-intensity focused ultrasound

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been reported to be a minimally invasive effective method for the treatment of secondary hypersplenism. However, neither the short-term efficacy nor the indications and/or contraindications have been described in patients with cirrhosis. From October 2019 to May 2021, eleven cases of patients with cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism were enrolled. The blood counts, liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound and/or MRI scans of all patients were closely evaluated. Among these 11 patients, eight (72.7%) patients were classified as Child-Pugh A, and the other 3 (27.3%) patients were Child-Pugh B; Five (45%) patients were diagnosed with gallstone, including multiple small stones in 2 patients and single stone in 3 patients. HIFU was performed successfully in all 11 patients. After HIFU, hematologic parameters and liver function were significantly improved in all 11 patients (p < 0.05). The HIFU ablated volume to spleen volume rate was 35-61%. Complications were ecchymosis of the waist in 7 (63.3%) patients, ablated area pain in 3 (27.3%) patients, and choledocholithiasis in 2 (18.2%) patients with multiple small gallstones. All of them recovered smoothly without additional treatment except for 2 patients with choledocholithiasis recovered with risky endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment. This series suggested that HIFU is an effective and safe treatment for cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism in patients classified as Child-Pugh A or B. However, multiple small gallstones could be a relative contraindication for it.

Comparison of Dose and Effectiveness of a Single-Session Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids With Different Sizes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the dose and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation of uterine fibroids with different sizes and explore the effect of uterine fibroid size on dose, which provided dose evaluation for clinicians in accordance with the size of uterine fibroids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,000 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids who received a single-session USgHIFU treatment were enrolled in this study. The size of fibroids was divided into seven groups: 3-4 cm, 4-5 cm, 5-6 cm, 6-7 cm, 7-8 cm, 8-9 cm, and 9-11 cm. The dose was expressed on the basis of the energy efficiency factor (EEF) as the energy required for ablation per unit volume of tissue, and the non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR) was used to assess the effect of HIFU ablation.

RESULTS

The median NPVR of 88.3% (IQR: 80.3%-94.8%) was obtained, and no significant difference was observed among the seven groups. The classification of T2-weighted image signal intensity fibroids in the 4-5 cm group was compared with that in the 6-7 cm and 8-9 cm groups, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). However, the proportion of T2WI hyperintense signal fibroids had no significant difference among the seven groups (p > 0.05). The median EEF was 3.88 J/mm³, and a significant difference was observed among the seven groups of EEF (p < 0.05). The EEF of groups with a fibroid size less than 6 cm was more than double the EEF of groups with a fibroid size above 6 cm. In addition, the EEF of groups with a fibroid size of 4-5 cm and 3-4 cm was 3-4 times higher than those with a fibroid size above 7 cm (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-session HIFU ablation for uterine fibroids of 3-11 cm can obtain an NPVR of more than 80%. The EEF decreased with the increase of the size of uterine fibroids. A fibroid size of 6.5 cm was considered as a clinical meaningful point affecting EEF.

A Systematic Review of Minimally Invasive Treatments for Uterine Fibroid-Related Bleeding

Newer minimally invasive techniques provide treatment options for symptomatic uterine fibroids while allowing uterus preservation. The objective of this review was to analyze the efficacy of uterine-preserving, minimally invasive treatment modalities in reducing fibroid-related bleeding. A comprehensive search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2020. English-language publications that evaluated premenopausal women with fibroid-related bleeding symptoms before and after treatment were considered. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for bias with the established Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and observational studies were assessed for quality under the New Castle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. Eighty-four studies were included in the review, including 10 randomized controlled trials and 74 observational studies. Six studies on myomectomy demonstrated overall bleeding symptom improvement in up to 95.9% of patients, though there was no significant difference between mode of myomectomy. Forty-one studies on uterine artery embolization reported significant reduction of fibroid-related bleeding, with symptomatic improvement in 79 to 98.5% of patients. Three studies suggested that embolization may be superior to myomectomy in reducing fibroid-related bleeding. Six studies reported that laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion combined with myomectomy led to greater reduction of bleeding than myomectomy alone. Fifteen studies demonstrated significantly reduced bleeding severity after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Additional research is needed to establish the superiority of these modalities over one another. Long-term evidence is limited in current literature for magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery, cryomyolysis, microwave ablation, and laser ablation.

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) for uterine fibroids: an observational single-center study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate treatment response of uterine fibroids after ultrasound guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) with a special focus on fibroid size and characterization based on Funaki classification scheme, as well as clinical response to treatment of leading fibroid-associated symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Uterine fibroids treated by USgHIFU were assigned to Funaki type 1-3 based on T2-w-MRI. Differences in size, non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR) and volume reduction over time were determined using T1-/T2-w MRI sequences and contrast-enhanced sonography. Treatment effects on three leading fibroid-associated symptoms were also evaluated. Measurements were compared by mixed model, Bland-Altman's plot and Spearman's correlation.

RESULTS

In this prospective single-center study, 35 patients with 44 symptomatic uterine fibroids were treated by USgHIFU (n = 22, n = 12 and n = 10 assigned to Funaki type 1, 2 and 3, respectively). NPVRs of Funaki type 1 and 2 fibroids were significantly higher compared to type 3 (p = .0023). A significant fibroid shrinkage was observed independent of Funaki type compared to baseline: 38.8 ± 26.9%, 46.7 ± 30.3% and 54.5 ± 29.3% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively (each p < .05). Moreover, patients experienced a significant improvement of fibroid-associated hypermenorrhea (3.9 ± 1.3 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3), pressure in the pelvic area (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9) and frequent urination (2.8 ± 1.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8) one year post-procedure (each p < .05), regardless of fibroid Funaki type.

CONCLUSION

Following USgHIFU, a significant shrinkage of uterine fibroids and improvement of leading fibroid-associated symptoms were demonstrated regardless of the Funaki type.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation versus surgical interventions for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the treatment success and safety of ultrasound- and MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with surgery for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids.

METHODS

We searched studies comparing HIFU with surgery for fibroids in different databases from January 2000 to July 2020. The mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for different outcome parameters was synthesized.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies involving 4450 women. Compared with the surgery group, the decrease in uterine fibroid severity score at 6- and 12-month follow-up was higher in the HIFU group (MD - 4.16, 95% CI - 7.39 to - 0.94, and MD - 2.44, 95% CI - 3.67 to - 1.20, p < 0.05). The increase in quality-of-life (QoL) score at 6- and 12-month follow-up was higher in the HIFU group (MD 2.13, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.14, and MD 2.34, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.85, p < 0.05). The duration of hospital stay and the time to return to work was shorter in the HIFU group (MD - 3.41 days, 95% CI - 5.11 to - 1.70, and MD - 11.61 days, 95% CI - 19.73 to - 3.50, p < 0.05). The incidence of significant complications was lower in the HIFU group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81, p < 0.05). The differences in the outcomes of adverse events, symptom recurrence, re-intervention, and pregnancy were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU is superior to surgery in terms of symptomatic relief, improvement in QoL, recovery, and significant complications. However, HIFU showed comparable effects to surgery regarding the incidence of adverse events, symptom recurrence, re-intervention, and pregnancy.

KEY POINTS

• HIFU ablation is superior to surgery in terms of symptomatic relief, improvement in QoL, recovery, and significant complications. • HIFU has comparable effects to surgery in terms of symptom recurrence rate, re-intervention rate, and pregnancy rate, indicating that HIFU is a promising non-invasive therapy that seems not to raise the risk of recurrence and re-intervention or deteriorate fertility compared to surgical approaches in women with fibroids. • There is still a lack of good-quality comparative data and further randomized studies are necessary to provide sufficient and reliable data, especially on re-intervention rate and pregnancy outcome.

A Prediction of NPVR ≥ 80% of Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Uterine Fibroids

Objective: To evaluate factors in predicting the treatment outcome of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for uterine fibroids with a non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR) of at least 80%.

Methods: One thousand patients with uterine fibroids who received USgHIFU were enrolled. Thirty-two independent variables of four dimensions of data set, including general information of patients, clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, and fibroid imaging characteristics, were used to investigate the potential predictors of the NPVR of at least 80% by multivariate logistic regression. NPVR was the gold standard for evaluating the efficiency of HIFU ablation, and a NPVR of at least 80% was considered sufficient ablation, while partial ablation was defined as having an NPVR of <80%.

Results: Out of 1,000 fibroids, 758 obtained sufficient ablation and 242 obtained partial ablation, and the median NPVR was 88.3% (interquartile range: 80.3–94.8%). The probability of NPVR reaching 80% fibroids with a signal intensity of T2WI of hypointense, isointense, and hyperintense was 86.4, 76.5, and 62.6%, respectively; fibroids with an enhancement type of T1WI of slight, irregular, and regular was 81.5, 73.6, and 63.7%, respectively; and fibroids with uterine anteroposterior of 30–130 mm was 57.7–78.3%, respectively. In patients with a platelet count of 50 × 10⁹/L−550 × 10⁹/L, the probability of NPVR reaching 80% is from 53.4 to 80.1%, respectively.

Conclusions: In predicting NPVR ≥ 80%, the signal intensity on T2WI was the most important factor affecting ablative efficiency, followed by enhancement type on T1WI, uterine anteroposterior, and platelet count.

The value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in preoperative prediction for efficacy of high-Intensity focused ultrasound uterine fibroids ablation

Objective: To investigate the application value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in preoperative prediction for efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound uterine fibroids ablationMethods: A prospective study was conducted on 32 women (41 fibroids) undergoing HIFU uterine fibroids ablation between January 2019 and September 2019. The virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) technique was used for the preoperative determination of uterine fibroids shear wave velocity (SWV). The stiffness of the preoperative uterine fibroids was graded on a virtual touch tissue image (VTI). All uterine fibroids were ablated with a single point ablation acoustic power of 400 W. All patients underwent pelvic cavity MRI examination for the measurement of the size, volume and non-perfused volume (NPV) of fibroids within the first month after HIFU ablation. The ablation rate of uterine fibroids was calculated according to the formula: ablation rate = NPV × 100/target fibroid volume. The patients were divided into two groups based on the postoperative ablation rate: ≥70% ablation rate group, and＜70% ablation rate group. The preoperative SWV and VTI grade of uterine fibroids were compared between the two groups. The correlation of preoperative uterine fibroids' SWV and VTI grade with HIFU ablation rate were analyzed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. The optimal cutoff points in preoperative uterine fibroids SWV of 70% ablation rate were determined by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis.Results: A total of 30 patients (73.17%, 30/41) showed ablation rate ≥70%, with preoperative uterine fibroids' SWV values of (3.42 ± 0.71) m/s. Of these, 24 patients (80%, 24/30) had VTI grades II-III. On the other hand, 26.83% (11/41) showed ablation rate <70%, with preoperative uterine fibroids' SWV values of (4.02 ± 0.69) m/s; of these, 63.6% (7/11) had VTI grade IV. The SWV values and VTI grades of preoperative uterine fibroids were significantly different in the two groups (p < 0.05). Interestingly, postoperative ablation rate was negatively correlated with preoperative uterine fibroids' SWV values (r= -0.536, p = 0.0003) and VTI grades (r= -0.511, p = 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of preoperative uterine fibroids' SWV values with ablation rate <70% was 0.75 at a cutoff value of 3.915 m/s (p < 0.05). Specificity was 72.7% and sensitivity was 80.1%; the positive predictive value was 72.7%, and the negative predictive value was 80%.Conclusion: ARFI technique is an effective and feasible noninvasive ultrasound technique for the preoperative prediction of the efficacy of HIFU uterine fibroids ablation.

Comparison of Focused Ultrasound Surgery and Hysteroscopic Resection for Treatment of Submucosal Uterine Fibroids (FIGO Type 2)

The aim of the study described here was to compare the effectiveness of focused ultrasound surgery (FUS), which uses high-intensity focused ultrasound to perform tissue ablation, with that of hysteroscopic transcervical resection of myoma (TCRM) for the treatment of type 2 submucosal fibroids. A prospective cohort study was performed in patients who underwent FUS or TCRM from January 2012 to December 2014. Uterine Fibroid Symptom (UFS) and Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires were used to measure fibroid-related symptoms and quality of life before and at 3, 6 and 12 mo after treatment. Technical results, adverse events and post-operative recovery times of both groups were also compared. A total of 81 patients with at least one type 2 submucosal fibroid were enrolled. The mean diameter of type 2 submucosal fibroids was 3.8 ± 0.9 cm (range: 2.0-5.0 cm) for 39 patients in the FUS group and 3.5 ± 0.8 cm (range: 2.0-4.8 cm) for the 42 patients enrolled in the TCRM group. No major complication occurred in any patients for either treatment. In both groups, the UFS score decreased significantly and the QoL score increased significantly from baseline successively at 3, 6 and 12 mo post-treatment (p < 0.05). Time spent in hospital post-treatment was significantly shorter (2.56 ± 0.98 d) for the FUS group compared with the TCRM group (3.31 ± 0.60 d) (p < 0.05). Time to return to work after treatment was also significantly shorter for the FUS group (3.14 ± 0.83 d) than for the TCRM group (6.09 ± 0.9 d) (p < 0.05). FUS and TCRM are both tolerable and effective treatments with significant improvement of symptom and quality of life for patients with type 2 submucosal fibroids ≤5 cm in diameter.