Evaluation of MR elastography as a response parameter for transarterial chemoembolization of colorectal liver metastases

Liver Cancer Vascularity Driven by Extracellular Matrix Stiffness: Implications for Imaging Research

BACKGROUND

Extracellular matrix stiffness represents a barrier to effective local and systemic drug delivery. Increasing stiffness disrupts newly formed vessel architecture and integrity, leading to tumor-like vasculature. The resulting vascular phenotypes are manifested through different cross-sectional imaging features. Contrast-enhanced studies can help elucidate the interplay between liver tumor stiffness and different vascular phenotypes.

PURPOSE

This study aims to correlate extracellular matrix stiffness, dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and dynamic contrast-enhancement ultrasound imaging features of 2 rat hepatocellular carcinoma tumor models.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Buffalo-McA-RH7777 and Sprague Dawley (SD)-N1S1 tumor models were used to evaluate tumor stiffness by 2-dimensional shear wave elastography, along with tumor perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Atomic force microscopy was used to calculate tumor stiffness at a submicron scale. Computer-aided image analyses were performed to evaluate tumor necrosis, as well as the percentage, distribution, and thickness of CD34+ blood vessels.

RESULTS

Distinct tissue signatures between models were observed according to the distribution of the stiffness values by 2-dimensional shear wave elastography and atomic force microscopy ( P < 0.05). Higher stiffness values were attributed to SD-N1S1 tumors, also associated with a scant microvascular network ( P ≤ 0.001). Opposite results were observed in the Buffalo-McA-RH7777 model, exhibiting lower stiffness values and richer tumor vasculature with predominantly peripheral distribution ( P = 0.03). Consistent with these findings, tumor enhancement was significantly greater in the Buffalo-McA-RH7777 tumor model than in the SD-N1S1 on both dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography ( P < 0.005). A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between tumor perfusion on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in terms of the total area under the curve and % microvessel tumor coverage ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The stiffness signatures translated into different tumor vascular phenotypes. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography adequately depicted different stromal patterns, which resulted in unique imaging perfusion parameters with significantly greater contrast enhancement observed in softer tumors.

Targeting the mechano-microenvironment and liver cancer stem cells: a promising therapeutic strategy for liver cancer

Over the past 2 decades, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been identified as the root cause of cancer occurrence, progression, chemoradioresistance, recurrence, and metastasis. Targeting CSCs is a novel therapeutic strategy for cancer management and treatment. Liver cancer (LC) is a malignant disease that can endanger human health. Studies are increasingly suggesting that changes in the liver mechanical microenvironment are a primary driver triggering the occurrence and development of liver cancer. In this review, we summarize current understanding of the roles of the liver mechano-microenvironment and liver cancer stem cells (LCSCs) in liver cancer progression. We also discuss the relationship between the mechanical heterogeneity of liver cancer tissues and LCSC recruitment and metastasis. Finally, we highlight potential mechanosensitive molecules in LCSCs and mechanotherapy in liver cancer. Understanding the roles and regulatory mechanisms of the mechano-microenvironment and LCSCs may provide fundamental insights into liver cancer progression and aid in further development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Elastic modulus-reflected liver lesion stiffness relates to worse prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness relates to more advanced tumor status and poor outcomes in primary liver cancer, while its prognostic role in pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis is unclear. Therefore, the current study aimed to explore the correlation of elastic modulus (EM)-reflected liver lesion stiffness with clinical characteristics, tumor markers, and survival among pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis.

METHODS

Fifty-four pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis were enrolled, and the EM of liver metastasis and peripheral liver tissue was measured by two-dimensional shear wave elastography. Relative EM was calculated as the ratio of EM in liver metastasis to that in peripheral liver tissue, which reflected the relative liver lesion stiffness.

RESULTS

The median relative EM of liver metastasis was 7.8 (interquartile range: 4.8-10.7) folds. Relative EM of liver metastasis was correlated with primary pancreatic cancer location (P = 0.048), the presence of extra lung metastasis (P = 0.040), liver metastasis ≥ 3 cm (P = 0.007), and the absence of extraskeletal metastasis (P = 0.036); but it was not correlated with tumor markers such as CA199, CA125, or CEA (all P > 0.05). Encouragingly, high relative EM of liver metastasis (cut off by median value) was correlated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.032) but not overall survival (OS) (P = 0.285). Multivariable Cox analysis showed that high relative EM of liver metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.768, P = 0.048) and multiple metastases (HR = 2.262, P = 0.036) independently predicted decreased PFS, but only abnormal CEA independently forecasted decreased OS (HR = 2.390, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Elastic modulus reflected liver lesion stiffness may predict a worse prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis.

Clinical application of Magnetic resonance elastography in hepatocellular carcinoma: from diagnosis to prognosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and a major public health problem worldwide. Liver fibrosis is closely correlated with liver functional reserve and the risk of HCC development. Meanwhile, malignant tumors generally have high cellularity compared to benign tumors, which results in increased stiffness. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has emerged as a new non-invasive technique for assessing tissue stiffness with excellent diagnostic accuracy, not only for assessing liver fibrosis but also for measuring tumor stiffness. Recent studies provide new evidence that MRE may play an important role in the management of patients with HCC and show several novel clinical applications, such as predicting the development of HCC, differentiating between benign/malignant liver lesions (FLL) and HCC pathological grades, assessing treatment response, and predicting recurrence after treatment, although some findings are controversial. Therefore, we conducted this review to summarize these novel applications of MRE in HCC patients and also discuss their limitations and future advancement.

Response comparison of PLC and SLC with magnetic resonance elastography after TACE

The aim of this study was to detect a response difference in primary (PLC) and secondary liver tumors (SLC) with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) after TACE therapy. Thirty-one patients (25/31 male; mean age 69.6 years [range: 39-85 years]) with repeated TACE therapy of HCC were compared with twenty-seven patients (27/27 female; mean age 61.2 years [range 39-81 years]) with repeated TACE therapy of metastatic liver disease due to breast cancer. Both groups underwent either one (n = 31) or two (n = 27) repetitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRE exams in 4- to 6-week intervals using a 1.5-T-scanner. MRE-based liver stiffness and size measurements were evaluated in tumorous lesions and in healthy liver lobe controls. PLC showed a significantly larger tumor size compared to SLC (26.4 cm2 vs. 11 cm2, p = 0.007) and a higher degree of stiffness (5.8 kPa vs. 5.1 kPa, p = 0.04). Both tumors decreased in size during the cycles (PLC: p = 0.8 and SLC: p < 0.0001) and lesions showed an increase in stiffness (PLC: p = 0.002 and SLC: p = 0.006). MRE demonstrates that PLC and SLC have similar responses to TACE therapy. PLC had a greater increase in stiffness and SLC got smaller. An increasing stiffness and decrease in size could show a good response.

MR elastography is a good response parameter for microwave ablation liver tumors

OBJECTIVES

To determine the response of hepatic tissue to percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of liver tumors via MR elastography in a clinical setting using MRI and MR elastography.

METHODS

51 Patients (28 m, 23f) underwent MWA of liver tumors (HCC: 20, metastasis: 31) and received MRI and MR elastography immediately before and 24 h after MWA. Retrospective analysis included pre- and post-ablative tumor extent, T1/T2 mapping and stiffness values as well as the duration and energy dose of the MWA session.

RESULTS

Total liver stiffness increased by 4.3% from 3.31 kPa to 3.45 kPa (p = 0.036). Total liver stiffness post-MWA significantly correlated with the duration of the MWA session (r = 0.369, p = 0.008). The higher the baseline tumor stiffness was, the more energy had to be applied in MWA (r = 0.391, p < 0.001) and the longer the duration of the session (r = 0.391, p = 0.007). Healthy parenchyma stiffness increased by 3.5% from 3.55 kPa to 3.68 kPa (p = 0.142) and was strongly influenced by the cumulative energy (r = 0.436, p < 0.001), the duration (r = 0.458, p < 0.001) and the energy intensity (r = 0.458, p < 0.001) of MWA. 43 patients had a technically successful ablation result (margin ≥ 5 mm). Those with successful ablation had increased ablation margin stiffness (5.3 kPa vs. 4.6 kPa, p = 0.26) and had received higher ablation intensity than those with unsuccessful ablation (5.73 kJ/min vs. 5.03 kJ/min, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Additional MRE may be used before and after MWA to assess treatment response and collateral tissue damage after MWA. Baseline tumor stiffness helps finding the appropriate MWA parameters.

The Advance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Tumor Diagnosis

The change in tissue stiffness caused by pathological changes in the tissue's structure could be detected earlier, prior to the manifestation of their clinical features. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive imaging technique that uses low-frequency vibrations to quantitatively measure the elasticity or stiffness of tissues. In tumor tissue, stiffness is directly related to tumor development, invasion, metastasis, and chemoradiotherapy resistance. It also dictates the choice of surgical method. At present, MRE is widely used in assessing different human organs, such as the liver, brain, breast, prostate, uterus, gallbladder, and colon stiffness. In the field of oncology, MRE's value lies in tumor diagnosis (especially early diagnosis), selection of treatment method, and prognosis evaluation. This article summarizes the principle of MRE and its research and application progress in tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Early effect of 90Y radioembolisation on hepatocellular carcinoma and liver parenchyma stiffness measured with MR elastography: initial experience

OBJECTIVES

To quantify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver parenchyma stiffness using MR elastography (MRE) and serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP), before and 6 weeks (6w) after ⁹⁰Y radioembolisation (RE), and to assess the value of baseline tumour and liver stiffness (TS/LS) and AFP in predicting response at 6w and 6 months (6 m).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (M/F 18/5, mean age 68.3 ± 9.3 years) scheduled to undergo RE were recruited into this prospective single-centre study. Patients underwent an MRI exam at baseline and 6w following RE (range 39-47 days) which included MRE using a prototype 2D EPI sequence. TS, peritumoural LS/LS remote from the tumour, tumour size, and AFP were measured at baseline and at 6w. Treatment response was determined using mRECIST at 6w and 6 m.

RESULTS

MRE was technically successful in 17 tumours which were classified at 6w as complete response (CR, n = 7), partial response (PR, n = 4), and stable disease (SD, n = 6). TS and peritumoural LS were significantly increased following RE (p = 0.016, p = 0.039, respectively), while LS remote from tumour was unchanged (p = 0.245). Baseline TS was significantly lower in patients who achieved CR at 6w (p = 0.014). Baseline TS, peritumoural LS (both AUC = 0.857), and AFP (AUC = 0.798) showed fair/excellent diagnostic performance in predicting CR at 6w, but were not significant predictors of OR or CR at 6 m.

CONCLUSION

Our initial results suggest that HCC TS and peritumoural LS increase early after RE. Baseline TS, peritumoural LS, and AFP were all significant predictors of CR to RE at 6w. These results should be confirmed in a larger study.

KEY POINTS

• Magnetic resonance elastography-derived tumour stiffness and peritumoural liver stiffness increase significantly at 6 weeks post radioembolisation whereas liver stiffness remote from the tumour is unchanged. • Baseline tumour stiffness and peritumoural liver stiffness are lower in patients who achieve complete response at 6 weeks post radioembolisation. • Baseline tumour size is significantly correlated with baseline tumour stiffness.

Value of shear wave elastography with maximal elasticity in differentiating benign and malignant solid focal liver lesions

BACKGROUND

It is important to differentiate benign and malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) accurately. Despite the wide use and acceptance of shear wave elastography (SWE), its value for assessing the elasticity of FLLs and differentiating benign and malignant FLLs is still investigational. Previous studies of SWE for FLLs used mean elasticity as the parameter to reflect the stiffness of FLLs. Considering the inhomogeneity of tumor stiffness, maximal elasticity (Emax) might be the suitable parameter to reflect the stiffness of FLLs and to differentiate malignant FLLs from benign ones.

AIM

To explore the value of SWE with Emax in differential diagnosis of solid FLLs.

METHODS

We included 104 solid FLLs in 95 patients and 50 healthy volunteers. All the subjects were examined using conventional ultrasound (US) and virtual touch tissue quantification(VTQ) imaging. A diagnosis of benign or malignant FLL was made using conventional US. Ten VTQ values were acquired after 10 consecutive measurements for each FLL and each normal liver, and the largest value was recorded as Emax.

RESULTS

There were 56 cases of malignant FLLs and 48 cases of benign FLLs in this study. Emax of malignant FLLs (3.29 ± 0.88 m/s) was significantly higher than that of benign FLLs (1.30 ± 0.46 m/s, P < 0.01) and that of livers in healthy volunteers (1.15 ± 0.17 m/s, P < 0.01). The cut-off point of Emax was 1.945, and the area under the curve was 0.978. The sensitivity and specificity of Emax were 92.9% and 91.7%, respectively, higher (but not significantly) than those of conventional US (80.4% for sensitivity and 81.3% for specificity). Combined diagnosis of conventional US and Emax using parallel testing improved the sensitivity to 100% with specificity of 75%.

CONCLUSION

SWE is a convenient and easy method to obtain accurate stiffness information of solid FLLs. Emax is useful for differential diagnosis of FLLs, especially in combination with conventional US.