Coronary artery calcium severity grading on non-ECG-gated low-dose chest computed tomography: a multiple-observer study in a nationwide lung cancer screening registry

Prevalence and clinical implications of coronary artery calcium scoring on non-gated thoracic computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Coronary artery calcifications (CACs) indicate the presence of coronary artery disease. CAC can be found on thoracic computed tomography (CT) conducted for non-cardiac reasons. This systematic review and meta-analysis of non-gated thoracic CT aims to assess the clinical impact and prevalence of CAC.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for articles assessing prevalence, demographic characteristics, accuracy and prognosis of incidental CAC on non-gated thoracic CT. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 108 studies (113,406 patients) were included (38% female). Prevalence of CAC ranged from 2.7 to 100% (pooled prevalence 52%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 46-58%). Patients with CAC were older (pooled standardised mean difference 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.11, p < 0.001), and more likely to be male (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.95, 95% CI 1.55-2.45, p < 0.001), with diabetes (pooled OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.95-3.54, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolaemia (pooled OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.33-3.93, p < 0.01) and hypertension (pooled OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.26-6.70, p < 0.001), but not higher body mass index or smoking. Non-gated CT assessment of CAC had excellent agreement with electrocardiogram-gated CT (pooled correlation coefficient 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001). In 51,582 patients, followed-up for 51.6 ± 27.4 months, patients with CAC had increased all cause mortality (pooled relative risk [RR] 2.13, 95% CI 1.57-2.90, p = 0.004) and major adverse cardiovascular events (pooled RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.26-3.93, p < 0.001). When CAC was present on CT, it was reported in between 18.6% and 93% of reports.

CONCLUSION

CAC is a common, but underreported, finding on non-gated CT with important prognostic implications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Coronary artery calcium is an important prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease. It can be assessed on non-gated thoracic CT and is a commonly underreported finding. This represents a significant population where there is a potential missed opportunity for lifestyle modification recommendations and preventative therapies. This study aims to highlight the importance of reporting incidental coronary artery calcium on non-gated thoracic CT.

KEY POINTS

• Coronary artery calcification is a common finding on non-gated thoracic CT and can be reliably identified compared to gated-CT. • Coronary artery calcification on thoracic CT is associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascsular events. • Coronary artery calcification is frequently not reported on non-gated thoracic CT.

Coronary calcifications as assessed on routine non-gated chest CT; a gatekeeper to tailor downstream additional imaging in patients with stable chest pain

Background and aims

Currently applied methods for risk-assessment in coronary artery disease (CAD) often overestimate patients' risk for obstructive CAD. To enhance risk estimation, assessment of coronary artery calcium (CAC) can be applied. In 10 % of patients presenting with stable chest pain a previous non-gated computed tomography (CT) has been performed, suitable for CAC-assessment. This study is the first to investigate the clinical utility of CAC-assessment on non-gated CT for risk-assessment of obstructive CAD in symptomatic patients.

Methods

For this analysis, all patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), in whom a previous non-gated chest CT was performed were included. The extent of CAC was assessed on chest CT and ordinally scored. CAD was assessed on CCTA and obstructive CAD defined as stenosis of ≥70 %. Patients were stratified according to CAC-severity and percentages of patients with obstructive CAD were compared between the CAC groups.

Results

In total, 170 patients of 32-88 years were included and 35 % were male. The percentage of obstructive CAD between the CAC groups differed significantly (p < 0.01). A calcium score of 0 ruled out obstructive CAD irrespective of sex, pre-test probability, type of complaints and number of risk factors with a 100 % certainty. Furthermore, a mild CAC score ruled out obstructive CAD in patients with low - intermediate PTP or non-anginal complaints with 100 % certainty.

Conclusion

When available, CAC on non-gated chest CT can accurately rule out obstructive CAD and can therefore function as a radiation-free and cost-free gatekeeper for additional imaging in patients presenting with stable chest pain.

The Clear Value of Coronary Artery Calcification Evaluation on Non-Gated Chest Computed Tomography for Cardiac Risk Stratification

To enhance risk stratification in patients suspected of coronary artery disease, the assessment of coronary artery calcium (CAC) could be incorporated, especially when CAC can be readily assessed on previously performed non-gated chest computed tomography (CT). Guidelines recommend reporting on patients' extent of CAC on these non-cardiac directed exams and various studies have shown the diagnostic and prognostic value. However, this method is still little applied, and no current consensus exists in clinical practice. This review aims to point out the clinical utility of different kinds of CAC assessment on non-gated CTs. It demonstrates that these scans indeed represent a merely untapped and underestimated resource for risk stratification in patients with stable chest pain or an increased risk of cardiovascular events. To our knowledge, this is the first review to describe the clinical utility of different kinds of visual CAC evaluation on non-gated unenhanced chest CT. Various methods of CAC assessment on non-gated CT are discussed and compared in terms of diagnostic and prognostic value. Furthermore, the application of these non-gated CT scans in the general practice of cardiology is discussed. The clinical utility of coronary calcium assessed on non-gated chest CT, according to the current literature, is evident. This resource of information for cardiac risk stratification needs no specific requirements for scan protocol, and is radiation-free and cost-free. However, some gaps in research remain. In conclusion, the integration of CAC on non-gated chest CT in general cardiology should be promoted and research on this method should be encouraged.

Evaluation of Clinical Applicability of Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment on Non-Gated Chest Computed Tomography, Compared With the Classic Agatston Score on Cardiac Computed Tomography

Given current pretest probability (PTP) estimations tend to overestimate patients' risk for obstructive coronary artery disease, evaluation of patients' coronary artery calcium (CAC) is more precise. The value of CAC assessment with the Agatston score on cardiac computed tomography (CT) for risk estimation has been well indicated in patients with stable chest pain. CAC can be equally well assessed on routine non-gated chest CT, which is often available. This study aims to determine the clinical applicability of CAC assessment on non-gated CT in patients with stable chest pain compared with the classic Agatston score on gated CT. Consecutive patients referred for evaluation of the Agatston score, who had a previously performed non-gated chest CT for evaluation of noncardiac diseases, were included. CAC on non-gated CT was ordinally scored. Subsequently, patients were stratified according to CAC severity and PTP. The agreement and correlation between the classic Agatston score and CAC on non-gated CT were evaluated. The discriminative power for risk reclassification of both CAC assessment methods was assessed. Invasive coronary angiography was used as the gold standard, when available. A total of 140 patients aged between 30 and 88 years were included. The agreement between ordinally scored CAC and the Agatston score was excellent (κ = 0.82) and the correlation strong (r = 0.94). Most patients (80%) with an intermediate PTP had no or mild CAC on non-gated CT. They were reclassified at low risk with 100% accuracy compared with invasive coronary angiography. Similarly, 86% of patients had an Agatston score <300. These patients were reclassified with 98% accuracy. In patients with high PTP, the accuracy remained substantial and comparable, 94% and 89%, respectively. In conclusion, we believe this is the first study to assess the clinical applicability of CAC on non-gated CT in patients with stable chest pain, compared with the classic Agatston score. The agreement between methods was excellent and the correlation strong. Furthermore, CAC assessment on non-gated CT could reclassify patients' risk for obstructive coronary artery disease as accurately as could the classic Agatston score.

Lung cancer screening

Randomised controlled trials, including the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and the NELSON trial, have shown reduced mortality with lung cancer screening with low-dose CT compared with chest radiography or no screening. Although research has provided clarity on key issues of lung cancer screening, uncertainty remains about aspects that might be critical to optimise clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This Review brings together current evidence on lung cancer screening, including an overview of clinical trials, considerations regarding the identification of individuals who benefit from lung cancer screening, management of screen-detected findings, smoking cessation interventions, cost-effectiveness, the role of artificial intelligence and biomarkers, and current challenges, solutions, and opportunities surrounding the implementation of lung cancer screening programmes from an international perspective. Further research into risk models for patient selection, personalised screening intervals, novel biomarkers, integrated cardiovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessments, smoking cessation interventions, and artificial intelligence for lung nodule detection and risk stratification are key opportunities to increase the efficiency of lung cancer screening and ensure equity of access.

Cardiovascular Risk Stratification by Automatic Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Pretreatment Chest Computed Tomography in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Balancing the cardiovascular risk and benefit of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is an important clinical issue. We aimed to evaluate whether the pretreatment coronary artery calcium score (CACS) can stratify the risk of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

The patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from 4 hospitals were retrospectively enrolled. The CACS was automatically calculated on nongated chest computed tomography before treatment using artificial intelligence-CACS software and divided into 3 categories (0, 1-100, and >100). The associations between the CACS and CTRCD and between the CACS and MACEs were assessed by logistic regression and Fine-Gray competing-risk regression model. Nelson-Aalen cumulative risk curve was performed to assess the cumulative incidence of MACEs.

RESULTS

A total of 1468 patients (785 men and 683 women; 100% Asian) were enrolled, and 362 and 185 patients developed CTRCD and MACEs, respectively. Compared with a CACS of 0 (n=826), there was stepwise higher odds of CTRCD with a CACS between 1 and 100 (n=356; odds ratio, 2.587) and a CACS >100 (n=286; odds ratio, 5.239). The CACS was associated with MACEs (1-100 versus 0: subdistribution hazard ratio 3.726; >100 versus 0: subdistribution hazard ratio 7.858; all P<0.001). Competing risk-adjusted MACEs rates for patients with a CACS of 0, 1 to 100, and >100 were 1.21%, 8.43%, and 11.19%, respectively, at 3 years, and 3.27%, 16.01%, 31.12%, respectively, at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The automatic CACS derived from chest computed tomography before treatment was helpful to identify high-risk patients of CTRCD and MACE and guide clinicians to implement cardiovascular protection strategies in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Incidental coronary artery calcification on non-gated CT thorax correlates with risk of cardiovascular events and death

OBJECTIVES

To assess coronary artery calcification (CAC) on non-contrast non-ECG-gated CT thorax (NC-NECG-CTT) and to evaluate its correlation with short-term risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and death.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective study including all patients 40-70 years old who underwent NC-NECG-CTT over a period of 6 months. Individuals with known CVD were excluded. The presence of CAC was assessed and quantified by the Agatston score (CACS). CAC severity was defined as mild (< 100), moderate (100-400), or severe (> 400). CVD events (including CVD death, myocardial infarction, revascularisation procedures, ischaemic stroke, acute peripheral atherosclerotic ischaemia), and all-cause mortality over a median of 3.5 years were recorded. Cox proportional-hazards regression modelling was performed including CACS, age, gender and CVD risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and family history of CVD).

RESULTS

Of the total 717 eligible cases, 325 (45%) had CAC. In patients without CAC, there was only one CVD event, compared to 26 CVD events including 5 deaths in patients with CAC. The presence and severity of CAC correlated with CVD events (p < 0.001). A CACS > 100 was significantly associated with both CVD events, hazard ratio (HR) 5.74, 95% confidence interval: 2.19-15.02; p < 0.001, and all-cause mortality, HR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.08-2.66; p = 0.02. Ever-smokers with CAC had a significantly higher risk for all-cause mortality compared to never-smokers (p = 0.03), but smoking status was not an independent predictor for CVD events in any subgroup category of CAC severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and severity of CAC assessed on NC-NECG-CTT correlates with short-term cardiovascular events and death.

KEY POINTS

• Patients aged 40-70 years old without known CVD but with CAC on NC-NECG-CTT have a higher risk of CVD events compared to those without CAC. • CAC (Agatston) score above 100 confers a 5.7-fold increase in the risk of short-term CVD events in these patients. • The presence and severity of CAC on NC-NECG-CTT may have prognostic and therapeutic implications.

A Modified Length-Based Grading Method for Assessing Coronary Artery Calcium Severity on Non-Electrocardiogram-Gated Chest Computed Tomography: A Multiple-Observer Study

OBJECTIVE

To validate a simplified ordinal scoring method, referred to as modified length-based grading, for assessing coronary artery calcium (CAC) severity on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated chest computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 120 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 63.1 ± 14.5 years; male, 64) who underwent both non-ECG-gated chest CT and ECG-gated cardiac CT between January 2011 and December 2021. Six radiologists independently assessed CAC severity on chest CT using two scoring methods (visual assessment and modified length-based grading) and categorized the results as none, mild, moderate, or severe. The CAC category on cardiac CT assessed using the Agatston score was used as the reference standard. Agreement among the six observers for CAC category classification was assessed using Fleiss kappa statistics. Agreement between CAC categories on chest CT obtained using either method and the Agatston score categories on cardiac CT was assessed using Cohen's kappa. The time taken to evaluate CAC grading was compared between the observers and two grading methods.

RESULTS

For differentiation of the four CAC categories, interobserver agreement was moderate for visual assessment (Fleiss kappa, 0.553 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.496-0.610]) and good for modified length-based grading (Fleiss kappa, 0.695 [95% CI: 0.636-0.754]). The modified length-based grading demonstrated better agreement with the reference standard categorization with cardiac CT than visual assessment (Cohen's kappa, 0.565 [95% CI: 0.511-0.619 for visual assessment vs. 0.695 [95% CI: 0.638-0.752] for modified length-based grading). The overall time for evaluating CAC grading was slightly shorter in visual assessment (mean ± SD, 41.8 ± 38.9 s) than in modified length-based grading (43.5 ± 33.2 s) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The modified length-based grading worked well for evaluating CAC on non-ECG-gated chest CT with better interobserver agreement and agreement with cardiac CT than visual assessment.

Validation of deep learning-based fully automated coronary artery calcium scoring using non-ECG-gated chest CT in patients with cancer

This study aimed to demonstrate clinical feasibility of deep learning (DL)-based fully automated coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring software using non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated chest computed tomography (CT) from patients with cancer. Overall, 913 patients with colorectal or gastric cancer who underwent non-contrast-enhanced chest CT between 2013 and 2015 were included. Agatston scores obtained by manual segmentation of CAC on chest CT were used as reference. Reliability of automated CAC score acquisition was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The agreement for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification was assessed with linearly weighted k statistics. ICCs between the manual and automated CAC scores were 0.992 (95% CI, 0.991 and 0.993, p<0.001) for total Agatston scores, 0.863 (95% CI, 0.844 and 0.880, p<0.001) for the left main, 0.964 (95% CI, 0.959 and 0.968, p<0.001) for the left anterior descending, 0.962 (95% CI, 0.956 and 0.966, p<0.001) for the left circumflex, and 0.980 (95% CI, 0.978 and 0.983, p<0.001) for the right coronary arteries. The agreement for cardiovascular risk was excellent (k=0.946, p<0.001). Current DL-based automated CAC software showed excellent reliability for Agatston score and CVD risk stratification using non-ECG gated CT scans and might allow the identification of high-risk cancer patients for CVD.

Lung Opacity and Coronary Artery Calcium Score: A Combined Tool for Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction in COVID-19 Patients

PURPOSE

To assess and correlate pulmonary involvement and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with the degree of coronary plaque burden based on the CAC-DRS classification (Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 142 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (58 ± 16 years; 57 women) who underwent non-contrast CT between January 2020 and August 2021 and were followed up for 129 ± 72 days. One experienced blinded radiologist analyzed CT series for the presence and extent of calcified plaque burden according to the visual and quantitative HU-based CAC-DRS Score. Pulmonary involvement was automatically evaluated with a dedicated software prototype by another two experienced radiologists and expressed as Opacity Score.

RESULTS

CAC-DRS Scores derived from visual and quantitative image evaluation correlated well with the Opacity Score (r=0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86, and r=0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89, respectively; p<0.0001) with higher correlation in severe than in mild stage SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (p<0.0001). Combined, CAC-DRS and Opacity Scores revealed great potential to discriminate fatal outcomes from a mild course of disease (AUC 0.938, 95% CI 0.89-0.97), and the need for intensive care treatment (AUC 0.801, 95% CI 0.77-0.83). Visual and quantitative CAC-DRS Scores provided independent prognostic information on all-cause mortality (p=0.0016 and p<0.0001, respectively), both in univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary plaque burden is strongly correlated to pulmonary involvement, adverse outcome, and death due to respiratory failure in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, offering great potential to identify individuals at high risk.

Association of coronary calcification with prognosis of Covid-19 patients without known heart disease

Risk factors that determine the severity of Covid-19 have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of coronary artery calcification (CAC) as a risk factor for death or mechanical ventilation (MV) of patients without known heart disease infected with Covid-19. We analyzed 283 consecutive in-patients with acute respiratory symptoms with chest computed tomography (chest-CT), without previous heart disease, and criteria for Covid-19 (RT-PCR positive and/or typical clinical and chest-CT findings). CAC was classified by the number of coronary segments affected as absent (0), mild (1-3), and severe calcification (more than 3). The association between CAC, CAC severity, and death or MV due to severe respiratory failure was assessed by logistic regression. The mean age was 58.7±15.7 years and 54.1% were men. Patients with CAC were older, more likely to have hypertension, and less likely to be obese. CAC was present in 75 patients (26.5%), of which 42 had a mild calcification and 33 had severe calcification, and was associated with death (OR=2.35, 95%CI: 1.01-5.48) or MV (OR=2.72, 95%CI: 1.20-6.20) adjusted for multiple confounders, with significant and increased odds ratio for the severe form of CAC (death: OR=3.70, 95%CI: 1.20-11.42; MV: OR=3.30, 95%CI: 1.09-9.95). We concluded that CAC was an independent risk factor for death or MV in Covid-19 patients without previous heart disease, particularly for those with severe calcification. CAC can be easily visualized on common chest-CT, widely used in evaluation of moderate to severe Covid-19.

Coronary artery calcium score above 250 confirms the presence of significant stenosis in coronary CT angiography of symptomatic patients

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) at multiple low and high cutoff values for the detection of significant coronary stenosis at two different cutoffs (50 and 70%) in a large number of symptomatic patients was not investigated previously in one study. This study aims to investigate if there are a correlation and statistical significance between different CACS cutoffs and the severity of coronary artery stenosis by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in symptomatic patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that included all symptomatic patients who had CCTA in a tertiary care hospital over a period of 7 years.

RESULTS

CCTA of 502 patients was evaluated (406 included, mean age 56.2 years); 230 were males (56.7%). The prevalence of stenosis at any percentage was 53.7%, ≥50% was 26.6% and ≥70% was 12.3%. The mean CACS was 84.5 (range 0-1860), for males was 124.5 and for females was 32.1. Patients with CACS of zero (59%) and CACS of ≥1 (41%) had a mean stenosis of 8.9% (range 0-75%) and 52.6% (range 0-100%), respectively. All patients with a CACS of ≥250 were found to have ≥50% stenosis (100% specificity and positive predictive value, 35.2% sensitivity, 81% negative predictive value and 82.6% accuracy). The percentage of stenosis increased as CACS increased with strong statistical significance (P value < 0.0001) and a positive correlation (r = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

CACS is a valuable diagnostic tool to predict the severity of coronary artery stenosis. A cutoff value of 250 confirmed the presence of at least 50% stenosis in symptomatic patients.

Comparison of artery-based methods for ordinal grading of coronary artery calcium on low-dose chest computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

To identify the optimal artery-based method for ordinal grading of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) among three methods.

METHODS

A total of 120 asymptomatic subjects who underwent both LDCT and ECG-gated calcium scoring CT on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Three cardiothoracic radiologists independently assessed CAC severity on LDCT (1.25-mm and 2.5-mm slice thickness) and classified it into four categories (none, mild, moderate, or severe) using three artery-based ordinal scoring methods (extent-based scoring, Weston scoring, and length-based scoring). Inter- and intra-observer CAC severity agreements of each method were assessed by Fleiss kappa statistics. Agreements between each method and ECG-gated calcium scoring CT were assessed by weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The inter-observer agreement was highest with length-based method for both 1.25-mm (Fleiss kappa 0.735 for extent-based method, 0.801 for Weston score, and 0.813 for length-based method) and 2.5-mm slice thickness evaluation (Fleiss kappa 0.755 for extent-based method, 0.776 for Weston score, and 0.833 for extent-based method). Agreement across the three grading methods for the same observer was poor to moderate on 1.25-mm (Fleiss kappa 0.379-0.441) and moderate on 2.5-mm thickness evaluation (Fleiss kappa 0.427-0.461). Agreement of CAC severity between each method and ECG-gated calcium scoring CT was highest with the length-based method for all three observers on both 1.25-mm (weighted kappa 0.773-0.786) and 2.5-mm (weighted kappa 0.794-0.825) LDCT images.

CONCLUSION

Among the three artery-based ordinal grading methods, the length-based method appears to be the most reliable for evaluating CAC on non-ECG-gated LDCT.

KEY POINTS

• The length-based method showed the highest inter-observer agreement and the highest agreement with the ECG-gated calcium scoring CT, compared with the extent-based method and the Weston score.

Effectiveness of radiologist training in improving reader agreement for Lung-RADS 4X categorization

OBJECTIVES

To identify the agreement on Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System 4X categorization between radiologists and an expert-adjudicated reference standard and to investigate whether training led to improvement of the agreement measures and diagnostic potential for lung cancer.

METHODS

Category 4 nodules in the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project were identified retrospectively, and each 4X nodule was matched with one 4A or 4B nodule. An expert panel re-evaluated the categories and determined the reference standard. Nineteen radiologists were asked to determine the presence of CT features of malignancy and 4X categorization for each nodule. A review was performed in two sessions, and training material was given after session 1. Agreement on 4X categorization between radiologists and the expert-adjudicated reference standard and agreement between radiologist-assessed 4X categorization and lung cancer diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 48 expert-adjudicated 4X nodules and 64 non-4X nodules were evenly distributed in each session. The proportion of category 4X decreased after training (56.4% ± 16.9% vs. 33.4% ± 8.0%; p < 0.001). Cohen's κ indicated poor agreement (0.39 ± 0.16) in session 1, but agreement improved in session 2 (0.47 ± 0.09; p = 0.03). The increase in agreement in session 2 was observed among inexperienced radiologists (p < 0.05), and experienced and inexperienced reviewers exhibited comparable agreement performance in session 2 (p > 0.05). All agreement measures between radiologist-assessed 4X categorization and lung cancer diagnosis increased in session 2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Radiologist training can improve reader agreement on 4X categorization, leading to enhanced diagnostic performance for lung cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Agreement on 4X categorization between radiologists and an expert-adjudicated reference standard was initially poor, but improved significantly after training. • The mean proportion of 4X categorization by 19 radiologists decreased from 56.4% ± 16.9% in session 1 to 33.4% ± 8.0% in session 2. • All agreement measures between the 4X categorization and lung cancer diagnosis increased significantly in session 2, implying that appropriate training and guidance increased the diagnostic potential of category 4X.