Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

Cardioaortic dimensions in German landrace pigs derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Pigs are frequently applied as animal models in cardiovascular research due to their anatomical and physiological similarity to humans. For study planning and refinement, precise knowledge of the cardioaortic dimensions is essential. In a retrospective single-center study, the cardioaortic dimensions and left ventricular function of German Landrace pigs were assessed using cardiac MRI. All parameters were compared between male and female pigs and analyzed for correlation with body weight. In total, 15 pigs were included (7 male and 8 female, weight 60.9 ± 7.0 kg). The left ventricle revealed an end-diastolic diameter of 50.5 ± 4.4 mm and an ejection fraction of 51.2 ± 9.8%. The diameters of the ascending and descending aorta were 21.3 ± 2.3 and 16.2 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between male and female pigs, except that males had a smaller end-diastolic left ventricular volume (p = 0.041). A moderate correlation was found between body weight and the aortic annulus diameter (R = 0.57, p = 0.027). In conclusion, cardiac MRI allows precise quantification of porcine cardioaortic dimensions. For medical device testing, size differences between pigs and humans should be considered.

Three-dimensional aortic geometry mapping via registration of non-gated contrast-enhanced or gated and respiratory-navigated MR angiographies

BACKGROUND

The measurement of aortic dimensions and their evolution are key in the management of patients with aortic diseases. Manual assessment, the current guideline-recommended method and clinical standard, is subjective, poorly reproducible, and time-consuming, limiting the capacity to track aortic growth in everyday practice. Aortic geometry mapping (AGM) via image registration of serial computed tomography angiograms outperforms manual assessment, providing accurate and reproducible 3D maps of aortic diameter and growth rate. This observational study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of AGM on non-gated contrast-enhanced (CE-) and cardiac- and respiratory-gated (GN-) magnetic resonance angiographies (MRA).

METHODS

Patients with thoracic aortic disease followed with serial CE-MRA (n = 30) or GN-MRA (n = 15) acquired at least 1 year apart were retrospectively and consecutively identified. Two independent observers measured aortic diameters and growth rates (GR) manually at several thoracic aorta reference levels and with AGM. Agreement between manual and AGM measurements and their inter-observer reproducibility were compared. Reproducibility for aortic diameter and GR maps assessed with AGM was obtained.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 2.3 years for CE- and 2.7 ± 1.6 years for GN-MRA. AGM was feasible in the 93% of CE-MRA pairs and in the 100% of GN-MRA pairs. Manual and AGM diameters showed excellent agreement and inter-observer reproducibility (ICC>0.9) at all anatomical levels. Agreement between manual and AGM GR was more limited, both in the aortic root by GN-MRA (ICC=0.47) and in the thoracic aorta, where higher accuracy was obtained with GN- than with CE-MRA (ICC=0.55 vs 0.43). The inter-observer reproducibility of GR by AGM was superior compared to manual assessment, both with CE- (thoracic: ICC= 0.91 vs 0.51) and GN-MRA (root: ICC=0.84 vs 0.52; thoracic: ICC=0.93 vs 0.60). AGM-based 3D aortic size and growth maps were highly reproducible (median ICC >0.9 for diameters and >0.80 for GR).

CONCLUSION

Mapping aortic diameter and growth on MRA via 3D image registration is feasible, accurate and outperforms the current manual clinical standard. This technique could broaden the possibilities of clinical and research evaluation of patients with aortic thoracic diseases.

The feasibility of relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering for preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background

Cardiovascular MRI is advantageous in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of comprehensive non-contrast MRI [relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT)] combined with a three-dimensional whole-heart MRI protocol for preprocedural planning of TAVI vs. computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Methods

Thirty patients with severe aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled. The anatomical properties of the aortic root anatomy, including the perimeter and area of the virtual aortic valve annulus and coronary heights, were determined from 3D whole-heart MRI and cardiac CTA (CCTA) images, respectively. The diameters of the aorta (thoracic and abdominal aorta) and iliofemoral arteries were measured from REACT and aortic CTA (ACTA) images, respectively. A paired t-test was used to compare these two modalities. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess cardiovascular MRI and CTA measurements. Transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing was performed based on CCTA measurements and compared with 3D whole-heart MRI measurements. The extent of annular calcification on 3D whole-heart MRI images was evaluated by a four-point grading scale and compared with CCTA data.

Results

All 30 patients completed CTA and cardiovascular MRI examinations, with the TAVI procedure being administered in 25 patients. The mean acquisition time of the comprehensive MRI protocol was 18 ± 3.2 min. There were no significant differences between ACTA and REACT data in regard to the diameters of aortic and iliofemoral arteries, including the ascending thoracic aorta (37 ± 4.6 mm vs. 37.7 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.085), descending thoracic aorta (24.3 ± 2.8 mm vs. 24.3 ± 2.8 mm, p = 0.832), abdominal aorta (20.9 ± 2.5 mm vs. 20.8 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.602), bilateral common iliac arteries (right: 8.36 ± 1.44 mm vs. 8.42 ± 1.27 mm, p = 0.590; left: 8.61 ± 1.71 mm vs. 8.86 ± 1.46 mm, p = 0.050), and bilateral femoral arteries (right: 6.77 ± 1.06 mm vs. 6.87 ± 1.00 mm, p = 0.157; left: 6.75 ± 1.02 mm vs. 6.90 ± 0.80 mm, p = 0.142). Both modalities showed similar aortic valve morphology and semi-quantitative valve calcification (all, p's > 0.05). Overall agreement for implanted THV was found in all 25 (100%) patients assessed with both modalities.

Conclusion

REACT combined with 3D whole-heart MRI enables reliable measurements of aortic root anatomy, annular calcification, and aorta and iliofemoral access in patients under evaluation for TAVI.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: 2023 Update

This document discusses preprocedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, evaluating the imaging modalities used in initial imaging for preprocedure planning under two variants 1) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic root; and 2) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. US echocardiography transesophageal, MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast, MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast and CT heart function and morphology with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of aortic root. CTA chest with IV contrast, CTA abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast, CTA chest abdomen pelvis with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Pre-Procedural Assessment of the Femoral Access Route for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Comparison of a Non-Contrast Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Protocol with Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Source Computed Tomography Angiography

Background: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a non-contrast time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) protocol for the pre-procedural access route assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in comparison with contrast-enhanced cardiac dual-source computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods and Results: In total, 51 consecutive patients (mean age: 82.69 ± 5.69 years) who had undergone a pre-TAVI cardiac CTA received TOF-MRA for a pre-procedural access route assessment. The MRA image quality was rated as very good (median of 5 [IQR 4-5] on a five-point Likert scale), with only four examinations rated as non-diagnostic. The TOF-MRA systematically underestimated the minimal effective vessel diameter in comparison with CTA (for the effective vessel diameter in mm, the right common iliac artery (CIA)/external iliac artery (EIA)/common femoral artery (CFA) MRA vs. CTA was 8.04 ± 1.46 vs. 8.37 ± 1.54 (p < 0.0001) and the left CIA/EIA/CFA MRA vs. CTA was 8.07 ± 1.32 vs. 8.28 ± 1.34 (p < 0.0001)). The absolute difference between the MRA and CTA was small (for the Bland-Altman analyses in mm, the right CIA/EIA/CFA was -0.36 ± 0.77 and the left CIA/EIA/CFA was -0.25 ± 0.61). The overall correlation between the MRA and CTA measurements was very good (with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.87 (p < 0.0001) for the right CIA/EIA/CFA and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9 (p < 0.0001) for the left CIA/EIA/CFA). The feasibility agreement between the MRA and CTA for transfemoral access was good (the right CIA/EIA/CFA agreement was 97.9% and the left CIA/EIA/CFA agreement was 95.7%, Kohen's kappa: 0.477 (p = 0.001)). Conclusions: The TOF-MRA protocol was feasible for the assessment of the access route in an all-comer pre-TAVI population. This protocol might be a reliable technique for patients at an increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Non-contrast MR angiography of pelvic arterial vasculature using the Quiescent interval slice selective (QISS) sequence

To evaluate Quiescent Interval Slice Selective (QISS) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) and QISS fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequences for non-contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of iliac arteries regarding image quality and diagnostic confidence in order to establish these sequences in daily clinical practice. A prospective study of healthy subjects (n = 10) was performed. All subjects underwent the QISS MRI protocol with bSSFP und FLASH sequences. Vessel contrast-to-background ratio (VCBR) were measured in pre-defined vessel segments. Image quality and diagnostic confidence was assessed using a Likert scale (five-point scale). Inter-reader agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ). Ten healthy subjects (median age 29 years, IQR: 26.25 to 30 years) were included in this prospective study. Median MR examination time was 2:05 min (IQR 1:58 to 2:16) for QISS bSSFP and 4:11 min (IQR 3:57 to 4:32) for QISS FLASH. Both sequences revealed good VCBR in all examined vessel segments. VCBR (muscle tissue) were marginally higher for FLASH sequences (e.g., 0.82 vs. 0.78 in the right femoral artery, p = 0.035*), while bSSFP sequence showed significantly higher VCBR (fat tissue) in the majority of examined arterials vessels (e.g., 0.78 vs. 0.62 in right femoral artery, p = 0.001*). The image quality and diagnostic confidence of both sequences were rated as good to excellent. Moderate to good inter-reader agreement was found. QISS MRA using bSSFP and FLASH sequences are diagnostic for visualization of iliac arterial vasculature. The QISS bSSFP sequence might offer advantages due to the markedly shorter exam time and superior visualization of smaller vessels. The QISS FLASH sequence seems to be a robust alternative for non-contrast MRA since it is less sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement: study protocol for a randomized trial (TAVR-CMR)

Background

The standard procedure for the planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the combination of echocardiography, coronary angiography, and cardiovascular computed tomography (TAVR-CT) for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size, and implantation route. However, up to 80% of the patients undergoing TAVR suffer from chronic renal insufficiency. Alternatives to reduce the need for iodinated contrast agents are desirable. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging recently has emerged as such an alternative. Therefore, we aim to investigate, for the first time, the non-inferiority of TAVR-CMR to TAVR-CT regarding efficacy and safety end-points.

Methods

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label trial. It is planned to include 250 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR based on a local heart-team decision. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive a predefined TAVR-CMR protocol or to receive a standard TAVR-CT protocol within 2 weeks after inclusion. Follow-up will be performed at hospital discharge after TAVR and after 1 and 2 years. The primary efficacy outcome is device implantation success at discharge. The secondary endpoints are a combined safety endpoint and a combined clinical efficacy endpoint at baseline and at 1 and 2 years, as well as a comparison of imaging procedure related variables. Endpoint definitions are based on the updated 2012 VARC-2 consensus document.

Discussion

TAVR-CMR might be an alternative to TAVR-CT for planning a TAVR procedure. If proven to be effective and safe, a broader application of TAVR-CMR might reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury after TAVR and thus improve outcomes.

Trial registration

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03831087). The results will be disseminated at scientific meetings and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Preoperative TAVR Planning: How to Do It

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) whose procedural efficacy and safety have been continuously improving. Appropriate preprocedural planning, including aortic valve annulus measurements, transcatheter heart valve choice, and possible procedural complication anticipation is mandatory to a successful procedure. The gold standard for preoperative planning is still to perform a multi-detector computed angiotomography (MDCT), which provides all the information required. Nonetheless, 3D echocardiography and magnet resonance imaging (MRI) are great alternatives for some patients. In this article, we provide an updated comprehensive review, focusing on preoperative TAVR planning and the standard steps required to do it properly.

CT Image Feature Diagnosis on the Basis of Deep Learning Algorithm for Preoperative Patients and Complications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

This work was aimed to explore the role of CT angiography information provided by deep learning algorithm in the diagnosis and complications of the disease focusing on congenital aortic valve disease and severe aortic valve stenosis. 120 patients who underwent ultrasound cardiography for aortic stenosis and underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in hospital were selected as the research objects. Patients received CT examination of deep learning algorithm within one week. The measurement methods were long and short diameter method, area method, and perimeter method. The deep learning algorithm was used to measure the long and short diameter, area, and perimeter of the target area before CT image processing. The results showed that the average diameter of long and short diameter measurement was 95% CI (0.84, 0.92), the average diameter of perimeter measurement was 95% CI (0.68, 0.87), and the average diameter of area measurement was 95% CI (0.72, 0.91). Among the 52 patients, 35 cases were hypertension (67%), 13 cases were diabetes (25%), 6 cases were chronic renal insufficiency (Cr > 2 mg/dL) (11%) (2 cases were treated with hemodialysis, 3.8%), 11 patients had chronic pulmonary disease (21%), 9 patients had cerebrovascular disease (17.3%) and atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Deep learning can achieve excellent results in CT image processing, and it was of great significance for the diagnosis of TAVI patients, improving the success rate of treatment and the prognosis of patients.

Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

Self- and navigator-gated 1.5 T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41 % male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56 %) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1-2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 min vs, 6.5 ± 2 min, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Theoretical prosthetic valve sizing of self-navigated MRA and CTA was equivalent (κ = 1). However, in four patients (15 %) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on self-navigated MRA.

CONCLUSION

Self-navigated MRA enables aortic annulus TAVI measurements without significant difference to navigator-gated MRA at shortened acquisition time. Prosthesis sizing by self-navigated MRA measurements is equivalent to navigator-gated MRA and CTA-based choice.

Self-navigated 3D whole-heart MRA for non-enhanced surveillance of thoracic aortic dilation: A comparison to CTA

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare image quality and reliability of a non-contrast, self-navigated 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for sizing of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA).

METHODS

Self-navigated 3D whole-heart 1.5 T MRA was performed in 20 patients (aged 67 ± 9 years, 75% male) for sizing of TAA; a subgroup of 18 (90%) patients underwent additional contrast-enhanced CTA on the same day. Subjective image quality was scored according to a 4-point Likert scale and ratings between observers were compared by Cohen's Kappa statistics. For MRA, subjective motion blurring and signal inhomogeneity was rated according to a 3-point scale, respectively. Objective signal inhomogeneity of MRA was quantified as standard deviation of the voxel intensities in a circular region of interest (ROI) placed in the ascending aorta divided by their mean value. Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Overall subjective image quality as rated by two observers was 1 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-2] for self-navigated MRA and 1.5 [IQR 1-2] for CTA (p = 0.717). For MRA, perfect inter-observer agreement was found regarding presence of artefacts and subjective image sharpness (κ = 1). Subjective signal inhomogeneity agreed moderately between the observers (κ = 0.58, p = 0.007), however, it correlated strongly with objectively quantified inhomogeneity of the blood pool signal (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). Maximum diameters of TAA as measured by self-navigated MRA and CTA showed very strong correlation (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) without significant inter-method bias (bias -0.03 mm, lower and upper limit of agreement -0.74 and 0.68 mm, p = 0.749). Inter-observer correlation of aortic aneurysm as measured by MRA was very strong (r = 0.96) without significant bias (p = 0.695).

CONCLUSION

Self-navigated 3D whole-heart MRA enables reliable contrast- and radiation free aortic dilation surveillance without significant difference to standardized CTA while providing predictable acquisition time and offering excellent image quality.