Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography lymphangiography with intranodal injection of water-soluble iodine contrast media in microminipig: imaging protocol and feasibility

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced CT Lymphangiography to Quantify Thoracic Duct Lymphatic Flow

Background CT lymphangiography has been used to image the lymphatic anatomy and assess lymphatic abnormalities. There is, however, a need to develop a method for quantification of lymphatic flow rate in the thoracic duct (TD). Purpose To develop and validate a TD lymphatic flow measurement technique using dynamic contrast-enhanced CT lymphangiography. Materials and Methods Lymphatic flow rate was measured with two techniques: a first-pass analysis technique based on a single compartment model and a thresholding technique distinguishing between opacified and nonopacified voxels within the TD. The measurements were validated in a swine animal model between November 2021 and September 2022. CT images were acquired at 100 kV and 200 mA using a fast-pitched helical scan mode covering the entire TD following contrast material injection into the bilateral inguinal lymph nodes. Two helical CT scans, acquired at the base and peak contrast enhancement of the TD, were used to measure lymphatic flow rate. A US flow probe surgically placed around the TD provided the reference standard measurement. CT lymphatic flow measurements were compared with the reference US flow probe measurements using regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Repeatability was determined using repeated flow measurements within approximately 10 minutes of each other. Results Eleven swine (10 male; mean weight, 43.6 kg ± 2.6 [SD]) were evaluated with 71 dynamic CT acquisitions. The lymphatic flow rates measured using the first-pass analysis and thresholding techniques were highly correlated with the reference US flow probe measurements (r = 0.99 and 0.91, respectively) and showed good agreement with the reference standard, with Bland-Altman analysis showing small mean differences of 0.04 and 0.05 mL/min, respectively. The first-pass analysis and thresholding techniques also showed good agreement for repeated flow measurements (r = 0.94 and 0.90, respectively), with small mean differences of 0.09 and 0.03 mL/min, respectively. Conclusion The first-pass analysis and thresholding techniques could be used to accurately and noninvasively quantify TD lymphatic flow using dynamic contrast-enhanced CT lymphangiography. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Choyke in this issue.

Back to the Future II-A Comprehensive Update on the Rapidly Evolving Field of Lymphatic Imaging and Interventions

ABSTRACT

Lymphatic imaging and interventional therapies of disorders affecting the lymphatic vascular system have evolved rapidly in recent years. Although x-ray lymphangiography had been all but replaced by the advent of cross-sectional imaging and the scientific focus shifted to lymph node imaging (eg, for detection of metastatic disease), interest in lymph vessel imaging was rekindled by the introduction of lymphatic interventional treatments in the late 1990s. Although x-ray lymphangiography is still the mainstay imaging technique to guide interventional procedures, several other, often less invasive, techniques have been developed more recently to evaluate the lymphatic vascular system and associated pathologies. Especially the introduction of magnetic resonance, and even more recently computed tomography, lymphangiography with water-soluble iodinated contrast agent has furthered our understanding of complex pathophysiological backgrounds of lymphatic diseases. This has led to an improvement of treatment approaches, especially of nontraumatic disorders caused by lymphatic flow abnormalities including plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, and nontraumatic chylolymphatic leakages. The therapeutic armamentarium has also constantly grown and diversified in recent years with the introduction of more complex catheter-based and interstitial embolization techniques, lymph vessel stenting, lymphovenous anastomoses, as well as (targeted) medical treatment options. The aim of this article is to review the relevant spectrum of lymphatic disorders with currently available radiological imaging and interventional techniques, as well as the application of these methods in specific, individual clinical situations.

Feasibility study of direct CT lymphangiography in mice: comparison with interstitial CT/MR lymphangiography

OBJECTIVES

To establish a CT lymphangiography method in mice via direct lymph node puncture.

METHODS

We injected healthy mice (n = 8) with 50 µl of water-soluble iodine contrast agent (iomeprol; iodine concentration, 350 mg/mL) subcutaneously into the left-rear foot pad (interstitial injection) and 20 µl of the same contrast agent directly into the popliteal lymph node (direct puncture) 2 days later. Additionally, we performed interstitial MR lymphangiography on eight mice as a control group. We calculated the contrast ratio for each lymph node and visually assessed the depiction of lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels on a three-point scale.

RESULTS

The contrast ratios of 2-min post-injection images of sacral and lumbar-aortic lymph nodes were 20.7 ± 16.6 (average ± standard deviation) and 17.1 ± 12.0 in the direct puncture group, which were significantly higher than those detected in the CT or MR interstitial lymphangiography groups (average, 1.8-3.6; p = 0.008-0.019). The visual assessment scores for sacral lymph nodes, lumbar-aortic lymph nodes, and cisterna chyli were significantly better in the direct puncture group than in the CT interstitial injection group (p = 0.036, 0.009 and 0.001, respectively). The lymphatic vessels between these structures were significantly better scored in direct puncture group than in the CT or MR interstitial lymphangiography groups at 2 min after injection (all p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In CT lymphangiography in mice, the direct lymph node puncture provides a better delineation of the lymphatic pathways than the CT/MR interstitial injection method.

KEY POINTS

• The contrast ratios of 2-min post-injection images in the direct CT lymphangiography group were significantly higher than those of CT/MR interstitial lymphangiography groups. • The visibility of lymphatic vessels in subjective analysis in the direct CT lymphangiography group was significantly better in the direct puncture group than in the CT/MR interstitial lymphangiography groups. • CT lymphangiography with direct lymph node puncture can provide excellent lymphatic delineation with contrast being maximum at 2 min after injection.

Imaging and Interventions for Lymphatic and Lymphatic-related Disorders

The lymphatic system is critical in fluid balance homeostasis. Yet, until recently, lymphatic imaging has been outside of mainstream medicine due to a lack of robust imaging and interventional options. However, during the last 20 years, both clinical lymphatic imaging and interventions have shown dramatic advancement. The key to imaging advancement has been the interstitial delivery of contrast agents through lymphatic-rich tissues. These techniques include intranodal lymphangiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography. These methods provide the ability to image and recognize lymphatic anatomy and pathologic conditions. Percutaneous thoracic duct catheterization and embolization became the first widely accepted interventional technique for the management of chyle leaks. Advances in interstitial lymphatic embolization, as well as liver and mesenteric lymphatic interventions, have broadened the scope of possible lymphatic interventions. Also, recent techniques of lymphatic decompression allow for the treatment of a variety of lymphatic disorders. Finally, immunologic studies of central lymphatic fluid reveal the potential of lymphatic interventions on immunity. These advances herald an exciting new chapter for lymphatic imaging and interventions in the coming years.

Intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT lymphangiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography in microminipig

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and image quality of intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT lymphangiography (DCCTL) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography (DCMRL) in microminipigs.

METHODS

Our institution's committee for animal research and welfare provided approval. Three microminipigs underwent DCCTL and DCMRL after inguinal lymph node injection of 0.1 mL/kg contrast media. Mean CT values on DCCTL and signal intensity (SI) on DCMRL were measured at the venous angle and thoracic duct (TD). The contrast enhancement index (CEI; increase in CT values pre- to post-contrast) and signal intensity ratio (SIR; SI of lymph divided by SI of muscle) were evaluated. The morphologic legibility, visibility, and continuity of lymphatics were qualitatively evaluated using a 4-point scale. Two microminipigs underwent DCCTL and DCMRL after lymphatic disruption and the detectability of lymphatic leakage was evaluated.

RESULTS

The CEI peaked at 5-10 min in all microminipigs. The SIR peaked at 2-4 min in two microminipigs and at 4-10 min in one microminipig. The peak CEI and SIR values were 235.6 HU and 4.8 for venous angle, 239.4 HU and 2.1 for upper TD, and 387.3 HU and 2.1 for middle TD. The visibility and continuity of upper-middle TD scores were 4.0 and 3.3-3.7 for DCCTL, and 4.0 and 4.0 for DCMRL. In the injured lymphatic model, both DCCTL and DCMRL demonstrated lymphatic leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

DCCTL and DCMRL in a microminipig model enabled excellent visualization of central lymphatic ducts and lymphatic leakage, indicating the research and clinical potential of both modalities.

KEY POINTS

• Intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography lymphangiography showed a contrast enhancement peak at 5-10 min in all microminipigs. • Intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography showed a contrast enhancement peak at 2-4 min in two microminipigs and at 4-10 min in one microminipig. • Both intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography lymphangiography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography demonstrated the central lymphatic ducts and lymphatic leakage.

Fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: role of novel echo techniques and multi-modality imaging assessment

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) represents one of the primary cardiomyopathies and may lead to heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Among various histologic features of the disease examined, assessment of myocardial fibrosis may offer valuable information, since it may be considered the common nominator for all HCM connected complications. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) has emerged as the reference noninvasive method for visualizing and quantifying myocardial fibrosis in patients with HCM. T1 mapping, a promising new CMR technique, may provide an advantage over conventional LGE-CMR, by permitting a more valid quantification of diffuse fibrosis. On the other hand, echocardiography offers a significantly more portable, affordable, and easily accessible solution for the study of fibrosis. Various echocardiographic techniques ranging from integrated backscatter and contrast-enhanced ultrasound to two- (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) deformation and shear wave imaging may offer new insights into substrate characterization in HCM. The aim of this review is to describe thoroughly all different modalities that may be used in everyday clinical practice for HCM fibrosis evaluation (with special focus on echocardiographic techniques), to concisely present available evidence and to argue in favor of multi-modality imaging application. It is essential to understand that the role of various imaging modalities is not competitive but complementary, since the information provided by each one is necessary to illuminate the complex pathophysiologic pathways of HCM, offering a personalized approach and treatment in every patient.

Effect of contrast agent viscosity and massage on success of computed tomography lymphangiography with aqueous contrast for sentinel lymph node identification in healthy dogs

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation is important for accurate cancer staging. Computed tomography (CT) lymphangiography with aqueous contrast is a feasible technique for SLN identification in dogs. Although most studies report success rates around 90%, success rates as low as 60% have been reported. One reason for low success rates may be the difference in viscosity of the various agents used in comparison to normal lymph viscosity. The objective of this study was to evaluate contrast agents of differing viscosities for use in CT lymphangiography for SLN identification and to determine the influence of massage on contrast flow rates. The hypothesis was that lower viscosity agents would have a higher success rate and faster time to identification of the SLN than higher viscosity agents and that massage would increase contrast flow rates. Dogs were anaesthetised and CT lymphangiography was performed with four contrast agents of differing viscosities in a randomized crossover design. Injections were made on the dorsal pes bilaterally on two study days and the popliteal lymph nodes were evaluated for contrast uptake. There was no significant difference in success of SLN identification or time to SLN identification among the four agents. Massage of the injection site increased rate of contrast flow through the lymphatics. No specific recommendation for one contrast agent over another can be made with these results. Massage is recommended to improve lymphatic flow when performing CT lymphangiography with aqueous contrast in dogs.