T2*-weighted MRI as a non-contrast-enhanced method for assessment of focal laser ablation zone extent in prostate cancer thermotherapy

Amide Proton Transfer Could Provide More Accurate Lesion Characterization in the Transition Zone of the Prostate

BACKGROUND

There is an overlap comparing transition zone prostate cancer (TZ PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), creating additional challenges for assessment of TZ tumors on MRI.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging provides new diagnostic ideas for TZ PCa.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 51 TZ PCa patients (age, 49-89), 44 stromal BPH (age, 57-92), and 45 glandular BPH patients (age, 56-92).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3 T; T2WI turbo spin echo (TSE), quantitative T2*-weighted imaging, DWI echo planar imaging, 3D APTw TSE.

ASSESSMENT

Differences in APTw, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and T2* among three lesions were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Regions of interest were drawn by two radiologists (X.Q.Z. and X.Y.Q., with 21 and 15 years of experience, respectively).

STATISTICAL TESTS

Multivariable logistic regression analyses; ANOVA with post hoc testing; receiver operator characteristic curve analysis; Delong test. Significance level: P < 0.05.

RESULTS

APTw among TZ PCa, stromal BPH, and glandular BPH (3.48% ± 0.83% vs. 2.76% ± 0.49% vs. 2.72% ± 0.45%, respectively) were significantly different except between stromal BPH and glandular BPH (P > 0.99). Significant differences were found in ADC (TZ PCa 0.76 ± 0.16 × 10^-3  mm² /sec vs. stromal BPH 0.91 ± 0.14 × 10^-3  mm² /sec vs. glandular BPH 1.08 ± 0.18 × 10^-3  mm² /sec) among three lesions. APTw (OR = 12.18, 11.80, respectively) and 1/ADC (OR = 703.87, 181.11, respectively) were independent predictors of TZ PCa from BPH and stromal BPH. The combination of APTw and ADC had better diagnostic performance in the identification of TZ PCa from BPH and stromal BPH.

DATA CONCLUSION

APTw imaging has the potential to be of added value to ADC in differentiating TZ PCa from BPH and stromal BPH.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Real-Time MRI-Guided Prostate Interventions

Simple Summary

Magnetic resonance imaging has shown to be a reliable imaging method for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and directly targeting lesions during biopsy. As newer treatment methods emerge, the role of MRI in minimally-invasive (focal) treatment of prostate cancer is also increasing. Here, we review the real-time MRI-guided prostate interventions for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, focusing on the technical aspects of each modality.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cause of cancer death in males. Targeting MRI-visible lesions has led to an overall increase in the detection of clinically significant PCa compared to the prior practice of random ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Additionally, advances in MRI-guided minimally invasive focal treatments are providing new options for patients with PCa. This review summarizes the currently utilized real-time MRI-guided interventions for PCa diagnosis and treatment.

[Clinical impact of abbreviated unenhanced prostate protocols in magnetic resonance imaging]

BACKGROUND

According to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with gadolinium-(Gd)-based contrast agents is the diagnostic standard of care in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Recent data suggest equivalent performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and mpMRI in defined indications.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the current role of abbreviated or unenhanced protocols in MRI of the prostate in various clinical settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of clinical trials, guidelines and expert opinions.

RESULTS

The use of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI sequences is associated with contrast agent-associated risks and has significant impact on the imaging procedure and costs. Arguments for and against the use of contrast agent in prostate protocols as well as equivalence from bpMRI and mpMRI are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, bpMRI can only be performed if very good image quality is available and in the hands of a radiologist with extensive experience in reading prostate MRI. There is a need for prospective studies to qualify bpMRI as the diagnostic method for the primary diagnosis of PCa.