Noninvasive diagnosis of portal hypertension using gadoxetate DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen

Portal vein computed tomography imaging characteristics and their relationship with bleeding risk in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing interventional therapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the predictive value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. A total of 62 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension and 28 healthy individuals were included. The results showed that multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging had a significant predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. The vascular area, number of vascular cross-sections, and gastric coronary vein diameter (GCVD) showed high predictive values, with the vascular area having the best predictive value.

AIM

To investigate the predictive accuracy of multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

This study included 62 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension (disease group) and 28 healthy individuals (control group). The disease group was further divided into two subgroups: Group A (n = 27, bleeding) and group B (n = 35, no bleeding). All patients underwent multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging at our hospital, and we compared various parameters such as liver blood flow, vein size, number of blood vessels, and blood vessel area between the two groups. We employed statistical analysis to identify factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and created a graph comparing the predictive value of different factors for bleeding.

RESULTS

We found no difference in hepatic artery (HAP) levels among the three groups (all P > 0.05). The portal vein levels in groups A and B were much lower than in the control group; group A was much lower than group B (all P < 0.05). The HAP perfusion index levels in groups A and B were much higher than in the control group; group A was much higher than group B (all P < 0.05). The portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter, and GCVD levels in groups A and B were much higher than in the control group; those in group A were much higher than those in group B (all P < 0.05). The number of blood vessels and blood vessel area in groups A and B were much higher than in the control group; those in group A were much higher than those in group B (all P < 0.05). The statistical method showed a strong link between GCVD, number of blood vessels, blood vessel area, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio = 1.275, 1.346, 1.397, P < 0.05). The graph showed that GCVD, number of blood vessels, and blood vessel area could predict bleeding well, with blood vessel area having the best prediction power.

CONCLUSION

That multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging can predict upper gastrointestinal bleeding well in patients with cirrhosis and high blood pressure in the portal vein. GCVD, number of blood vessels, and blood vessel area had high prediction power. The blood vessel area had the best prediction power, with an area under the curve of 0.831.

Performance of native and gadoxetate-enhanced liver and spleen T1 mapping for noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension: preliminary results

PURPOSE

In this preliminary study, our aim was to assess the utility of quantitative native-T₁ (T₁-pre), iron-corrected T₁ (cT₁) of the liver/spleen and T₁ mapping of the liver obtained during hepatobiliary phase (T₁-HBP) post-gadoxetate disodium, compared to spleen size/volume and APRI (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index) for noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension [CSPH, defined as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 10 mm Hg].

METHODS

Forty-nine patients (M/F: 27/22, mean age 53y) with chronic liver disease, HVPG measurement and MRI were included. Breath-held T₁ and cT₁ measurements were obtained using an inversion recovery Look-Locker sequence and a T2* corrected modified Look-Locker sequence, respectively. Liver T₁-pre (n = 49), spleen T₁ (obtained pre-contrast, n = 47), liver and spleen cT₁ (both obtained pre-contrast, n = 30), liver T₁-HBP (obtained 20 min post gadoxetate disodium injection, n = 36) and liver T₁ uptake (ΔT₁, n = 36) were measured. Spleen size/volume and APRI were also obtained. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between each of liver/spleen T₁/cT₁ parameters, spleen size/volume and APRI with HVPG. ROC analysis was performed to determine the performance of measured parameters for diagnosis of CSPH.

RESULTS

There were 12/49 (24%) patients with CSPH. Liver T₁-pre (r = 0.287, p = 0.045), liver T₁-HBP (r = 0.543, p = 0.001), liver ΔT₁ (r =  - 0.437, p = 0.008), spleen T₁ (r = 0.311, p = 0.033) and APRI (r = 0.394, p = 0.005) were all significantly correlated with HVPG, while liver cT₁, spleen cT₁ and spleen size/volume were not. The highest AUCs for the diagnosis of CSPH were achieved with liver T₁-HBP, liver ΔT₁ and spleen T₁: 0.881 (95%CI 0.76-1.0, p = 0.001), 0.852 (0.72-0.98, p = 0.002) and 0.781 (0.60-0.95, p = 0.004), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results demonstrate the potential of liver T₁ mapping obtained during HBP post gadoxetate disodium for the diagnosis of CSPH. These results require further validation.

Bibliometric-analysis visualization and review of non-invasive methods for monitoring and managing the portal hypertension

Background

Portal hypertension monitoring is important throughout the natural course of cirrhosis. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), regarded as the golden standard, is limited by invasiveness and technical difficulties. Portal hypertension is increasingly being assessed non-invasively, and hematological indices, imaging data, and statistical or computational models are studied to surrogate HVPG. This paper discusses the existing non-invasive methods based on measurement principles and reviews the methodological developments in the last 20 years.

Methods

First, we used VOSviewer to learn the architecture of this field. The publications about the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). VOSviewer 1.6.17.0 was used to analyze and visualize these publications, including the annual trend, the study hotspots, the significant articles, authors, journals, and organizations in this field. Next, according to the cluster analysis result of the keywords, we further retrieved and classified the related studies to discuss.

Results

A total of 1,088 articles or review articles about our topic were retrieved from WoSCC. From 2000 to 2022, the number of publications is generally growing. “World Journal of Gastroenterology” published the most articles (n = 43), while “Journal of Hepatology” had the highest citations. “Liver fibrosis” published in 2005 was the most influential manuscript. Among the 20,558 cited references of 1,088 retrieved manuscripts, the most cited was a study on liver stiffness measurement from 2007. The highest-yielding country was the United States, followed by China and Italy. “Berzigotti, Annalisa” was the most prolific author and had the most cooperation partners. Four study directions emerged from the keyword clustering: (1) the evaluation based on fibrosis; (2) the evaluation based on hemodynamic factors; (3) the evaluation through elastography; and (4) the evaluation of variceal bleeding.

Conclusion

The non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension is mainly based on two principles: fibrosis and hemodynamics. Liver fibrosis is the major initiator of cirrhotic PH, while hemodynamic factors reflect secondary alteration of splanchnic blood flow. Blood tests, US (including DUS and CEUS), CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) support the non-invasive assessment of PH by providing both hemodynamic and fibrotic information. Elastography, mainly USE, is the most important method of PH monitoring.

Portal hypertension may influence the registration of hypointensity of small hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatobiliary phase in gadoxetic acid MR

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze the association between the liver uptake of Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in cirrhotic patients and the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), and how these features impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection in the HBP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of 62 cirrhotic patients with newly US-detected nodule between 1-2 cm (study group). Twenty healthy subjects were used as control group. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the liver contrast uptake in the HBP assessed by Relative Liver-Enhancement (RLE), Liver-Spleen (LSCR), Liver-Muscle (LMCR), and Liver-Kidney Contrast-Ratio (LKCR), Contrast Enhancement Index (CEI), and Hepatic Uptake (HUI), and biliary excretion, were registered. CSPH was confirmed invasively (HVPG > 10 mmHg) or by indirect parameters. The appearance of HCC at the HBP was analyzed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (30.6%) did not have CSPH. In 41 patients (66.1%) the final diagnosis was HCC. All indices were significantly higher in the control group, indicating a more intense HBP liver signal intensity compared to patients with cirrhosis, even if the comparison was restricted to patients with no CSPH. CSPH was associated to a lower rate of HCC hypointensity in the HBP (51.9% vs. 85.7% without CSPH, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA at the HBP is decreased in cirrhosis even if the liver function is minimally impaired and it falls down significantly in patients with CSPH compromising the recognition of hypointense lesions. This fact may represent a limitation for the detection of small HCC in patients with cirrhosis and CSPH.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine

OBJECTIVES

(1) To assess the quality of the arterial input function (AIF) during dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of the liver and (2) to quantify perfusion parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver parenchyma during the first 3 min post-contrast injection with DCE-MRI using gadoxetate disodium compared to gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) in different patient populations.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we evaluated 66 patients with 83 HCCs who underwent DCE-MRI, using gadoxetate disodium (group 1, n = 28) or Gd-BOPTA (group 2, n = 38). AIF qualitative and quantitative features were assessed. Perfusion parameters (based on the initial 3 min post-contrast) were extracted in tumours and liver parenchyma, including model-free parameters (time-to-peak enhancement (TTP), time-to-washout) and modelled parameters (arterial flow (F_a), portal venous flow (F_p), total flow (F_t), arterial fraction, mean transit time (MTT), distribution volume (DV)). In addition, lesion-to-liver contrast ratios (LLCRs) were measured. Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

AIF quality, modelled and model-free perfusion parameters in HCC were similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.054-0.932). Liver parenchymal flow was lower and liver enhancement occurred later in group 1 vs group 2 (F_p, p = 0.002; F_t, p = 0.001; TTP, MTT, all p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in tumour LLCR (max. positive LLCR, p = 0.230; max. negative LLCR, p = 0.317).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate disodium provides comparable AIF quality and HCC perfusion parameters compared to Gd-BOPTA during dynamic phases. Despite delayed and decreased liver enhancement with gadoxetate disodium, LLCRs were equivalent between contrast agents, indicating similar tumour conspicuity.

KEY POINTS

• Arterial input function quality, modelled, and model-free dynamic parameters measured in hepatocellular carcinoma are similar in patients receiving gadoxetate disodium or gadobenate dimeglumine during the first 3 min post injection. • Gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine show similar lesion-to-liver contrast ratios during dynamic phases in patients with HCC. • There is lower portal and lower total hepatic flow and longer hepatic mean transit time and time-to-peak with gadoxetate disodium compared to gadobenate dimeglumine.