MRI following scoliosis surgery? An analysis of implant heating, displacement, torque, and susceptibility artifacts

Application of metal artifact reduction algorithm in reducing metal artifacts in post-surgery pediatric low radiation dose spine computed tomography (CT) images

Background

The commonly used methods for removing metal-induced beam hardening artifacts often rely on the use of high energy photons with either high tube voltage or high energy virtual monoenergetic images in dual-energy computed tomography (CT), the radiation dose was usually relatively high in order to generate adequate signals. This retrospective study is designed to evaluate the application of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in reducing pedicle screw metal-caused beam hardening artifacts in post-surgery pediatric low radiation dose spine CT images.

Methods

Seventy-seven children (3-15 years) who had undergone a low dose CT with 140 or 100 kV were enrolled. The radiation dose was 1.40 mGy for the 3-8 years old and 2.61 mGy for 9-15 years old children. There were 116 pedicle screws evaluated. The raw data were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) at 50% strength, ASIR-V with MAR (AV-MAR), deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) at high strength and DLIR with MAR (DL-MAR). The image quality concerning pedicle screws was evaluated objectively in terms of the length of beam-hardening artifact (LHA) and artifact index (AI), and subjectively using a 4-point scale (4 points: best, 3 points: acceptable).

Results

Both AV-MAR and DL-MAR significantly reduced metal-induced beam hardening artifacts with smaller LHA (15.76±10.12 mm, a reduction of 57.24% and 15.66±10.49 mm, a reduction of 57.40%, respectively), and AI value (62.50±33.51, a reduction of 64.65% and 61.03±32.61, a reduction of 65.01%, respectively) compared to ASIR-V and DLIR (all P<0.01), The subjective image quality scores concerning the screws were 3.37±0.49 and 3.47±0.50 with AV-MAR and DL-MAR, respectively, higher than the respective value of 1.73±0.44 and 1.76±0.43 without MAR (all P<0.01).

Conclusions

MAR significantly reduces the low-density artifacts caused by metal screws in post-surgery pediatric low-dose spine CT images, across different tube voltages, radiation dose levels and reconstruction algorithms. Combining DL-MAR further improves the overall image quality under low radiation dose conditions.

Comparing Metal Artifact Severity and Ability to Assess Near-Metal Anatomy Between 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI in Patients with Metallic Spinal Implants-A Scanner Comparison Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality and metal artifact severity at 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI in patients with spinal implants following posterior fusion surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

50 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 ± 12 years) who underwent 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI following posterior fusion surgery of the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine were included. Examinations used metal artifact reduction protocols from clinical routine. Images were rated by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists for image quality, ability to assess the spinal canal and the neural foramina, and artifact severity on 5-point Likert scales. Additionally, differences in artifact severity and visibility of near-metal anatomy among implant sizes (1-level vs. 2-level vs. >2-levels) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Signal/contrast (mean: 4.0 ± 0.3 [0.55 T] vs. 4.4 ± 0.6 [1.5 T]; p < .001) and resolution (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7; p < .001) were rated lower at 0.55 T. The ability to assess the spinal canal (4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9; p = .69) and the neural foramina (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; p = .19) were however rated equally good with excellent interrater agreement (range: 0.84-0.94). Susceptibility artifacts were rated milder at 0.55 T (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.6; p < .001). For implant size-based subgroups, the visibility of near-metal anatomy decreased with implant length at 1.5 T, but remained unchanged at 0.55 T. In consequence, the spinal canal and neural foramina could be better assessed at 0.55 T in patients with multi-level implants (4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 1.1; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Metal artifacts of spinal implants are substantially less pronounced at 0.55 T MRI. When examining patients with multi-level posterior fusion, this translates into a superior ability to assess near-metal anatomy, where 1.5 T MRI reaches diagnostic limitations.

Signal voids of active cardiac implants at 3.0 T CMR

Recent technical advancements allow cardiac MRI (CMR) examinations in the presence of so-called MRI conditional active cardiac implants at 3.0 T. However, the artifact burden caused by susceptibility effects remain an obstacle. All measurements were obtained at a clinical 3.0 T scanner using an in-house designed cubic phantom and optimized sequences for artifact evaluation (3D gradient echo sequence, multi-slice 2D turbo spin echo sequence). Reference sequences according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) were additionally applied. Four representative active cardiac devices and a generic setup were analyzed regarding volume and shape of the signal void. For analysis, a threshold operation was applied to the grey value profile of each data set. The presented approach allows the evaluation of the signal void and shape even for larger implants such as ICDs. The void shape is influenced by the orientation of the B0-field and by the chosen sequence type. The distribution of ferromagnetic material within the implants also matters. The void volume depends both on the device itself, and on the sequence type. Disturbances in the B0 and B1 fields exceed the visual signal void. This work presents a reproducible and highly defined approach to characterize both signal void artifacts at 3.0 T and their influencing factors.

A Survey of Methods and Technologies Used for Diagnosis of Scoliosis

The purpose of this article is to present diagnostic methods used in the diagnosis of scoliosis in the form of a brief review. This article aims to point out the advantages of select methods. This article focuses on general issues without elaborating on problems strictly related to physiotherapy and treatment methods, which may be the subject of further discussions. By outlining and categorizing each method, we summarize relevant publications that may not only help introduce other researchers to the field but also be a valuable source for studying existing methods, developing new ones or choosing evaluation strategies.