1
|
Patzer TS, Kunz AS, Huflage H, Conrads N, Luetkens KS, Pannenbecker P, Ergün S, Herbst M, Herold S, Weber T, Bley TA, Grunz JP. Tomosynthesis of the Appendicular Skeleton on a Twin Robotic X-ray System: A Cadaveric Fracture Study. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00090-4. [PMID: 38448327 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Aiming to offset image quality limitations in radiographs due to superimposition, this study investigates the diagnostic potential of appendicular skeleton tomosynthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight cadaveric extremities (four hands and feet) were examined employing the prototypical tomosynthesis mode of a twin robotic X-ray scanner. 12 protocols with varying sweep angles (10, 20 vs. 40°), frame rates (13 vs. 26 fps), and tube voltages (60 vs. 80 kV) were compared to radiographs. Four radiologists separately evaluated cortical and trabecular bone visualization and fracture patterns. Interreader reliability was assessed based on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS Radiation dose in radiography was 0.59 ± 0.20 dGy * cm2 versus 0.11 ± 0.00 to 2.46 ± 0.17 dGy * cm2 for tomosynthesis. Cortical bone display was inferior for radiographs compared to 40° and 20° tomosynthesis. Best results were ascertained for the 80 kV/40°/26 fps protocol. Trabecular bone depiction was also superior in tomosynthesis (p ≤ 0.009) and best with the 80 kV/10°/26 fps setting. Interreader reliability was moderate for cortical bone display (ICC 0.521, 95% confidence interval 0.356-0.641) and good for trabecular bone (0.759, 0.697-0.810). Diagnostic accuracy for articular involvement and multifragment situations was higher in tomosynthesis (93.8-100%/92.2-100%) vs. radiography (85.9%/82.8%.). Diagnostic confidence was also better in tomosynthesis (p ≤ 0.003). CONCLUSION Compared to radiography, tomosynthesis allows for superior assessability of cortical and trabecular bone and fracture morphology, especially at high framerates. Operating on a multipurpose X-ray system, tomosynthesis of the appendicular skeleton can be performed without additional scanner hardware.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Sophie Patzer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Steven Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Henner Huflage
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Nora Conrads
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Karsten Sebastian Luetkens
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Pauline Pannenbecker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Süleyman Ergün
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Koellikerstraße 6, 97070 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Herbst
- X-ray Products - Research & Development, Siemens Healthineers AG, Siemensstraße 3, 91301 Forchheim, Germany
| | - Sophia Herold
- X-ray Products - Research & Development, Siemens Healthineers AG, Siemensstraße 3, 91301 Forchheim, Germany
| | - Thomas Weber
- X-ray Products - Research & Development, Siemens Healthineers AG, Siemensstraße 3, 91301 Forchheim, Germany
| | - Thorsten Alexander Bley
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jan-Peter Grunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu SZ, Herbst M, Schaefer J, Weber T, Vogt S, Ritschl L, Kappler S, Kawcak CE, Stewart HL, Siewerdsen JH, Zbijewski W. Feasibility of bone marrow edema detection using dual-energy cone-beam computed tomography. Med Phys 2024; 51:1653-1673. [PMID: 38323878 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual-energy (DE) detection of bone marrow edema (BME) would be a valuable new diagnostic capability for the emerging orthopedic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems. However, this imaging task is inherently challenging because of the narrow energy separation between water (edematous fluid) and fat (health yellow marrow), requiring precise artifact correction and dedicated material decomposition approaches. PURPOSE We investigate the feasibility of BME assessment using kV-switching DE CBCT with a comprehensive CBCT artifact correction framework and a two-stage projection- and image-domain three-material decomposition algorithm. METHODS DE CBCT projections of quantitative BME phantoms (water containers 100-165 mm in size with inserts presenting various degrees of edema) and an animal cadaver model of BME were acquired on a CBCT test bench emulating the standard wrist imaging configuration of a Multitom Rax twin robotic x-ray system. The slow kV-switching scan protocol involved a 60 kV low energy (LE) beam and a 120 kV high energy (HE) beam switched every 0.5° over a 200° angular span. The DE CBCT data preprocessing and artifact correction framework consisted of (i) projection interpolation onto matched LE and HE projections views, (ii) lag and glare deconvolutions, and (iii) efficient Monte Carlo (MC)-based scatter correction. Virtual non-calcium (VNCa) images for BME detection were then generated by projection-domain decomposition into an Aluminium (Al) and polyethylene basis set (to remove beam hardening) followed by three-material image-domain decomposition into water, Ca, and fat. Feasibility of BME detection was quantified in terms of VNCa image contrast and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Robustness to object size, position in the field of view (FOV) and beam collimation (varied 20-160 mm) was investigated. RESULTS The MC-based scatter correction delivered > 69% reduction of cupping artifacts for moderate to wide collimations (> 80 mm beam width), which was essential to achieve accurate DE material decomposition. In a forearm-sized object, a 20% increase in water concentration (edema) of a trabecular bone-mimicking mixture presented as ∼15 HU VNCa contrast using 80-160 mm beam collimations. The variability with respect to object position in the FOV was modest (< 15% coefficient of variation). The areas under the ROC curve were > 0.9. A femur-sized object presented a somewhat more challenging task, resulting in increased sensitivity to object positioning at 160 mm collimation. In animal cadaver specimens, areas of VNCa enhancement consistent with BME were observed in DE CBCT images in regions of MRI-confirmed edema. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the proposed artifact correction and material decomposition pipeline can overcome the challenges of scatter and limited spectral separation to achieve relatively accurate and sensitive BME detection in DE CBCT. This study provides an important baseline for clinical translation of musculoskeletal DE CBCT to quantitative, point-of-care bone health assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Z Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher E Kawcak
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Holly L Stewart
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wojciech Zbijewski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demehri S, Baffour FI, Klein JG, Ghotbi E, Ibad HA, Moradi K, Taguchi K, Fritz J, Carrino JA, Guermazi A, Fishman EK, Zbijewski WB. Musculoskeletal CT Imaging: State-of-the-Art Advancements and Future Directions. Radiology 2023; 308:e230344. [PMID: 37606571 PMCID: PMC10477515 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
CT is one of the most widely used modalities for musculoskeletal imaging. Recent advancements in the field include the introduction of four-dimensional CT, which captures a CT image during motion; cone-beam CT, which uses flat-panel detectors to capture the lower extremities in weight-bearing mode; and dual-energy CT, which operates at two different x-ray potentials to improve the contrast resolution to facilitate the assessment of tissue material compositions such as tophaceous gout deposits and bone marrow edema. Most recently, photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been introduced. PCCT is a technique that uses photon-counting detectors to produce an image with higher spatial and contrast resolution than conventional multidetector CT systems. In addition, postprocessing techniques such as three-dimensional printing and cinematic rendering have used CT data to improve the generation of both physical and digital anatomic models. Last, advancements in the application of artificial intelligence to CT imaging have enabled the automatic evaluation of musculoskeletal pathologies. In this review, the authors discuss the current state of the above CT technologies, their respective advantages and disadvantages, and their projected future directions for various musculoskeletal applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadpour Demehri
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Francis I. Baffour
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Joshua G. Klein
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Elena Ghotbi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Hamza Ahmed Ibad
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Kamyar Moradi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Katsuyuki Taguchi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - John A. Carrino
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Ali Guermazi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Wojciech B. Zbijewski
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wieschollek S, Knie C, Megerle K. Cone-beam computed tomography in the treatment of distal radius fractures. HANDCHIR MIKROCHIR P 2023; 55:174-185. [PMID: 37307810 DOI: 10.1055/a-2055-2591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a relatively new imaging technique in hand surgery. Being the most common fractures in adults, distal radius fractures are of special importance not only to hand surgeons. The quantity alone calls for fast, efficient and reliable diagnostic procedures. Surgical techniques and possibilities are progressing, especially regarding intra-articular fracture patterns. The demand for exact anatomic reduction is high. There is an overall consensus regarding the indication for preoperative three-dimensional imaging and it is frequently used. Typically, it is obtained by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Postoperative diagnostic procedures are usually limited to plain x-rays. Commonly accepted recommendations regarding postoperative 3D imaging are not yet established. There is a lack of relevant literature. In case of an indication for a postoperative CT scan, it is generally also obtained by MDCT. CBCT for the wrist is not widely used as yet. This review focuses on the potential role of CBCT in the perioperative management of distal radius fractures. CBCT allows for high-resolution imaging with a potentially lower radiation dose compared with MDCT, both with and without implants. It is easily available and can be operated independently, thus being time-efficient and making daily practice easier. Due to its many advantages, CBCT is a recommendable alternative to MDCT in the perioperative management of distal radius fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Wieschollek
- Zentrum für Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie und plastische Chirurgie, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, München, Germany
| | - Careen Knie
- Zentrum für Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie und plastische Chirurgie, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, München, Germany
| | - Kai Megerle
- Zentrum für Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie und plastische Chirurgie, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kunz AS, Schmalzl J, Huflage H, Luetkens KS, Patzer TS, Kuhl PJ, Gruschwitz P, Petritsch B, Schmitt R, Bley TA, Grunz JP. Twin Robotic Gantry-Free Cone-Beam CT in Acute Elbow Trauma. Radiology 2023; 306:e221200. [PMID: 36346312 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background Posttraumatic CT imaging of the elbow can be challenging when patient mobility is limited. Gantry-free cone-beam CT (CBCT) with a twin robotic radiography system offers greater degrees of positioning freedom for three-dimensional elbow scans over gantry-based multidetector CT (MDCT), but studies analyzing their clinical value remain lacking. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of gantry-free CBCT versus two-dimensional radiography in adults and children with acute elbow trauma. Materials and Methods In a retrospective study, consecutive patients with elbow trauma and positioning difficulty in a gantry-based MDCT who underwent three-dimensional elbow imaging with a gantry-free CBCT after radiography were enrolled between January 2021 and April 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital. Imaging data sets were independently analyzed for fracture presence, articular involvement, and multi-fragment injuries by three radiologists. Diagnostic performance was calculated individually with surgical reports serving as the reference standard. Differences between radiography and CBCT were compared with the McNemar test. Diagnostic confidence was estimated subjectively by each reader, and results were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Elbow examinations of 23 adults and children (mean age ± SD, 49 years ± 23; seven women) were included with individual assessment of humerus, radius, and ulna (69 bones; 36 fractured). Multi-fragmentary fracture patterns and involvement of articular surfaces were ascertained in 28 and 30 bones, respectively. CBCT allowed for similar or higher sensitivity compared with radiography in the assessment of fractures (range for three readers, 94%-100% vs 72%-81%; respectively, P ≤ .06-.008), articular surface involvement (90%-97% vs 73%-87%; P ≤ .25), and multi-fragmentary patterns (96%-96% vs 68%-75%; P ≤ .03). Readers' diagnostic confidence improved considerably with access to CBCT data sets versus radiographs (all P ≤ .001). For CBCT, the median dose-length product was 70.9 mGy · cm, and the volume CT dose index was 4.4 mGy. Conclusion In acute elbow injuries, gantry-free cone-beam CT enabled improved detection of fractures, articular involvement, and multi-fragmentary patterns compared with two-dimensional radiography. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Steven Kunz
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Jonas Schmalzl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Henner Huflage
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Karsten Sebastian Luetkens
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Theresa Sophie Patzer
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Philipp Josef Kuhl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Philipp Gruschwitz
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Bernhard Petritsch
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Rainer Schmitt
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Thorsten Alexander Bley
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| | - Jan-Peter Grunz
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S.K., H.H., K.S.L., T.S.P., P.J.K., P.G., B.P., R.S., T.A.B., J.P.G.) and Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (J.S.), University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany (R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ibad HA, de Cesar Netto C, Shakoor D, Sisniega A, Liu S, Siewerdsen JH, Carrino JA, Zbijewski W, Demehri S. Computed Tomography: State-of-the-Art Advancements in Musculoskeletal Imaging. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:99-110. [PMID: 35976763 PMCID: PMC9742155 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Although musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a dominant role in characterizing abnormalities, novel computed tomography (CT) techniques have found an emerging niche in several scenarios such as trauma, gout, and the characterization of pathologic biomechanical states during motion and weight-bearing. Recent developments and advancements in the field of musculoskeletal CT include 4-dimensional, cone-beam (CB), and dual-energy (DE) CT. Four-dimensional CT has the potential to quantify biomechanical derangements of peripheral joints in different joint positions to diagnose and characterize patellofemoral instability, scapholunate ligamentous injuries, and syndesmotic injuries. Cone-beam CT provides an opportunity to image peripheral joints during weight-bearing, augmenting the diagnosis and characterization of disease processes. Emerging CBCT technologies improved spatial resolution for osseous microstructures in the quantitative analysis of osteoarthritis-related subchondral bone changes, trauma, and fracture healing. Dual-energy CT-based material decomposition visualizes and quantifies monosodium urate crystals in gout, bone marrow edema in traumatic and nontraumatic fractures, and neoplastic disease. Recently, DE techniques have been applied to CBCT, contributing to increased image quality in contrast-enhanced arthrography, bone densitometry, and bone marrow imaging. This review describes 4-dimensional CT, CBCT, and DECT advances, current logistical limitations, and prospects for each technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Ahmed Ibad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cesar de Cesar Netto
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Delaram Shakoor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alejandro Sisniega
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John A. Carrino
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wojciech Zbijewski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shadpour Demehri
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gantry-Free High-Resolution Cone-Beam CT: Efficacy for Distal Radius and Scaphoid Fracture Detection and Characterization. Acad Radiol 2022:S1076-6332(22)00486-X. [PMID: 36167629 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Gantry-free cone-beam CT (CBCT) allows for comfortable patient positioning due to an open scanner architecture. Since CBCT without gantry is not yet established for clinical wrist trauma imaging, this study's aim was to investigate its diagnostic value in the preoperative workup of patients with distal radius and scaphoid fractures. METHODS Within a 12-month period, 113 patients with severe wrist trauma underwent both radiography and CBCT with the same gantry-free multi-use scanner before surgery. Two radiologists retrospectively analyzed all datasets for the morphology of distal radius (n = 95) and scaphoid fractures (n = 20). In all 115 wrists (two bilateral injuries), surgical reports served as the standard of reference. RESULTS While accuracy for distal radius fractures was comparable among CBCT and radiographs, the former was superior with regard to scaphoid fractures (Reader 1: 100.0% vs. 75.0%; Reader 2: 100.0% vs. 65.0%). Accuracy for multi-fragmentary radius injuries (100.0% vs. 90.5%; 100.0% vs. 93.7%), and articular affliction (99.0% vs. 84.2%; 100.0% vs. 83.2%) was also higher in CBCT. Regarding scaphoid fractures, CBCT proved superior for diagnosis of proximal pole or waist involvement (100.0% vs. 70.0%; 100.0% vs. 65.0%) and comminuted patterns (100.0% vs. 70.0%; 100.0% vs. 75.0%). Median effective dose of CBCT was as low as 3.65 µSv compared with 0.16 µSv for standard radiography. CONCLUSION Gantry-free CBCT allows for excellent diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of distal radius and scaphoid fracture morphology. Even in patients with limited mobility, very low radiation dose is sufficient to maintain high image quality.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kunz AS, Patzer TS, Grunz JP, Luetkens KS, Hartung V, Hendel R, Fieber T, Genest F, Ergün S, Bley TA, Huflage H. Metal artifact reduction in ultra-high-resolution cone-beam CT imaging with a twin robotic X-ray system. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15549. [PMID: 36114270 PMCID: PMC9481547 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19978-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been shown to be a powerful tool for 3D imaging of the appendicular skeleton, allowing for detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture. This study was designed to compare artifacts in the presence of osteosynthetic implants between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in cadaveric wrist scans. A total of 32 scan protocols with varying tube potential and current were employed: both conventional CBCT and MDCT studies were included with tube voltage ranging from 60 to 140 kVp as well as additional MDCT protocols with dedicated spectral shaping via tin prefiltration. Irrespective of scanner type, all examinations were conducted in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode. For reconstruction of UHR-CBCT scans an additional iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm was employed, an image correction tool which cannot be used in combination with UHR-MDCT. To compare applied radiation doses between both scanners, the volume computed tomography dose index for a 16 cm phantom (CTDIvol) was evaluated. Images were assessed regarding subjective and objective image quality. Without automatic tube current modulation or tube potential control, radiation doses ranged between 1.3 mGy (with 70 kVp and 50.0 effective mAs) and 75.2 mGy (with 140 kVp and 383.0 effective mAs) in UHR-MDCT. Using the pulsed image acquisition method of the CBCT scanner, CTDIvol ranged between 2.3 mGy (with 60 kVp and 0.6 mean mAs per pulse) and 61.0 mGy (with 133 kVp and 2.5 mean mAs per pulse). In essence, all UHR-CBCT protocols employing a tube potential of 80 kVp or more were found to provide superior overall image quality and artifact reduction compared to UHR-MDCT (all p < .050). Interrater reliability of seven radiologists regarding image quality was substantial for tissue assessment and moderate for artifact assessment with Fleiss kappa of 0.652 (95% confidence interval 0.618-0.686; p < 0.001) and 0.570 (95% confidence interval 0.535-0.606; p < 0.001), respectively. Our results demonstrate that the UHR-CBCT scan mode of a twin robotic X-ray system facilitates excellent visualization of the appendicular skeleton in the presence of metal implants. Achievable image quality and artifact reduction are superior to dose-comparable UHR-MDCT and even MDCT protocols employing spectral shaping with tin prefiltration do not achieve the same level of artifact reduction in adjacent soft tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Steven Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Theresa Sophie Patzer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jan-Peter Grunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Karsten Sebastian Luetkens
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Hartung
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Robin Hendel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tabea Fieber
- Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Franca Genest
- Orthopedic Clinic König-Ludwig-Haus, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Süleyman Ergün
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Koellikerstr. 6, 97070, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Alexander Bley
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Henner Huflage
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Combining gantry-free cone-beam computed tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for surgical follow-up imaging of the appendicular skeleton. Eur J Radiol 2022; 155:110465. [PMID: 35973302 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Post-surgical evaluation of osteosynthesis material and adjacent tissue can be challenging in both radiography and cross-sectional imaging. This study investigates the performance of a multi-purpose X-ray scanner with cone-beam CT (CBCT) function and iterative metal artefact reduction capabilities in patients after osteoplasty of the appendicular skeleton. METHOD Eighty individuals who underwent both conventional X-ray imaging and CBCT after osteoplasty of the hand/wrist (48), elbow (14), or ankle/foot (18) with the gantry-free twin robotic system were retrospectively enrolled. Radiological reports from clinical routine for both imaging modalities were retrospectively analyzed and compared with consensus expert reading by two musculoskeletal specialists serving as the standard of reference. Findings of screw dislocation or implant loosening, fragment displacement, and delayed healing were compared between X-ray and CBCT reports using the McNemar test. RESULTS The median dose-area-product of CBCT and X-ray scans amounted to 27.98 and 0.2 dGy*cm2, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for screw dislocation was superior in CBCT compared to standard radiograms (98.8 % vs 83.8 %; p = 0.002). Implant loosening (98.8 % vs 86.3 %; p = 0.006), fragment displacement (98.8 % vs 85.0 %; p < 0.001), and delayed healing (97.5 % vs 88.8 %; p = 0.016) were also more reliably detected in CBCT. Employing CBCT, postoperative complications were detected with a sensitivity and specificity of at least 95.8 % and 98.1 %, compared to 33.3 % and 92.86 % in radiography. CONCLUSIONS With superior accuracy for various osteoplasty-related complications, the CBCT scan mode of a gantry-free twin robotic X-ray system with iterative metal artefact reduction aids post-surgical assessment in the appendicular skeleton.
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu SZ, Tivnan M, Osgood GM, Siewerdsen JH, Stayman JW, Zbijewski W. Model-based three-material decomposition in dual-energy CT using the volume conservation constraint. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac7a8b. [PMID: 35724658 PMCID: PMC9297826 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7a8b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective. We develop a model-based optimization algorithm for 'one-step' dual-energy (DE) CT decomposition of three materials directly from projection measurements.Approach.Since the three-material problem is inherently undetermined, we incorporate the volume conservation principle (VCP) as a pair of equality and nonnegativity constraints into the objective function of the recently reported model-based material decomposition (MBMD). An optimization algorithm (constrained MBMD, CMBMD) is derived that utilizes voxel-wise separability to partition the volume into a VCP-constrained region solved using interior-point iterations, and an unconstrained region (air surrounding the object, where VCP is violated) solved with conventional two-material MBMD. Constrained MBMD (CMBMD) is validated in simulations and experiments in application to bone composition measurements in the presence of metal hardware using DE cone-beam CT (CBCT). A kV-switching protocol with non-coinciding low- and high-energy (LE and HE) projections was assumed. CMBMD with decomposed base materials of cortical bone, fat, and metal (titanium, Ti) is compared to MBMD with (i) fat-bone and (ii) fat-Ti bases.Main results.Three-material CMBMD exhibits a substantial reduction in metal artifacts relative to the two-material MBMD implementations. The accuracies of cortical bone volume fraction estimates are markedly improved using CMBMD, with ∼5-10× lower normalized root mean squared error in simulations with anthropomorphic knee phantoms (depending on the complexity of the metal component) and ∼2-2.5× lower in an experimental test-bench study.Significance.In conclusion, we demonstrated one-step three-material decomposition of DE CT using volume conservation as an optimization constraint. The proposed method might be applicable to DE applications such as bone marrow edema imaging (fat-bone-water decomposition) or multi-contrast imaging, especially on CT/CBCT systems that do not provide coinciding LE and HE ray paths required for conventional projection-domain DE decomposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Z. Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Matthew Tivnan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Greg M. Osgood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - J. Webster Stayman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Wojciech Zbijewski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kanawati A, Constantinidis A, Williams Z, O'Brien R, Reynolds T. Generating patient-matched 3D-printed pedicle screw and laminectomy drill guides from Cone Beam CT images: Studies in ovine and porcine cadavers. Med Phys 2022; 49:4642-4652. [PMID: 35445429 PMCID: PMC9544846 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The emergence of robotic Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging systems in trauma departments has enabled 3D anatomical assessment of musculoskeletal injuries, supplementing conventional 2D fluoroscopic imaging for examination, diagnosis, and treatment planning. To date, the primary focus has been on trauma sites in the extremities. Purpose To determine if CBCT images can be used during the treatment planning process in spinal instrumentation and laminectomy procedures, allowing accurate 3D‐printed pedicle screw and laminectomy drill guides to be generated for the cervical and thoracic spine. Methods The accuracy of drill guides generated from CBCT images was assessed using animal cadavers (ovine and porcine). Preoperative scans were acquired using a robotic CBCT C‐arm system, the Siemens ARTIS pheno (Siemens Healthcare, GmbH, Germany). The CBCT images were imported into 3D‐Slicer version 4.10.2 (www.slicer.org) where vertebral models and specific guides were developed and subsequently 3D‐printed. In the ovine cadaver, 11 pedicle screw guides from the T1–T5 and T7–T12 vertebra and six laminectomy guides from the C2–C7 vertebra were planned and printed. In the porcine cadaver, nine pedicle screw guides from the C3–T4 vertebra were planned and printed. For the pedicle screw guides, accuracy was assessed by three observers according to pedicle breach via the Gertzbein–Robbins grading system as well as measured mean axial and sagittal screw error via postoperative CBCT and CT scans. For the laminectomies, the guides were designed to leave 1 mm of lamina. The average thickness of the lamina at the mid‐point was used to assess the accuracy of the guides, measured via postoperative CBCT and CT scans from three observers. For all measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine observer reliability. Results Compared with the planned screw angles for both the ovine and porcine procedures (n = 32), the mean axial and sagittal screw error measured on the postoperative CBCT scans from three observers were 3.9 ± 1.9° and 1.8 ± 0.8°, respectively. The ICC among the observes was 0.855 and 0.849 for the axial and sagittal measurements, respectively, indicating good reliability. In the ovine cadaver, directly comparing the measured axial and sagittal screw angle of the visible screws (n = 14) in the postoperative CBCT and conventional CT scans from three observers revealed an average difference 1.9 ± 1.0° in axial angle and 1.8 ± 1.0° in the sagittal angle. The average thickness of the lamina at the middle of each vertebra, as measured on‐screen in the postoperative CBCT scans by three observes was 1.6 ± 0.2 mm. The ICC among observers was 0.693, indicating moderate reliability. No lamina breaches were observed in the postoperative images. Conclusion Here, CBCT images have been used to generate accurate 3D‐printed pedicle screw and laminectomy drill guides for use in the cervical and thoracic spine. The results demonstrate sufficient precision compared with those previously reported, generated from standard preoperative CT and MRI scans, potentially expanding the treatment planning capabilities of robotic CBCT imaging systems in trauma departments and operating rooms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zoe Williams
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Ricky O'Brien
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Tess Reynolds
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fitzpatrick E, Sharma V, Rojoa D, Raheman F, Singh H. The use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in radiocarpal fractures: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:923-934. [PMID: 34542681 PMCID: PMC8930799 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03883-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Occult radiocarpal fractures often present a diagnostic challenge to the emergency department. Accurate diagnosis of these injuries is crucial as a missed fracture can lead to significant morbidity. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan is a novel imaging modality, with minimal radiation exposure and comparatively fast acquisition time. Our aim was to evaluate its use in the diagnosis of cortical fractures in the upper limb extremity. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of literature and included all studies that evaluated the use of CBCT in the diagnosis of radiocarpal fractures. We used a mixed-effects logistic regression bivariate model to estimate the summary sensitivity and specificity and constructed hierarchical summary receiver operative characteristic curves (HSROC). RESULTS We identified 5 studies, with 439 patients, and observed CBCT to be 87.7% (95% CI 77.6-93.6) sensitive and 99.2% (95% CI 92.6-99.9) specific for scaphoid fractures. For carpal fractures, CBCT was observed to have a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 90.6% (95% CI 72.7-97.2) and 100% (95% CI 99-100) respectively. For distal radius fractures, CBCT sensitivity was 90% (95% CI 67-98) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 10-100). The overall inter-rater agreement effect was shown to be 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), which is deemed to be almost perfect. CONCLUSION CBCT is an accurate diagnostic tool for occult radiocarpal cortical fractures, which could replace or supplement radiographs. We believe CBCT has a promising role in the acute radiocarpal fracture diagnostic algorithm in both emergency and trauma departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Fitzpatrick
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Vivek Sharma
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Djamila Rojoa
- Department of Plastics Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospital of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Firas Raheman
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Harvinder Singh
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Luetkens KS, Huflage H, Kunz AS, Ritschl L, Herbst M, Kappler S, Ergün S, Goertz L, Pennig L, Bley TA, Gassenmaier T, Grunz JP. The effect of tin prefiltration on extremity cone-beam CT imaging with a twin robotic X-ray system. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:433-439. [PMID: 34716089 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While tin prefiltration is established in various CT applications, its value in extremity cone-beam CT relative to optimized spectra has not been thoroughly assessed thus far. This study aims to investigate the effect of tin filters in extremity cone-beam CT with a twin-robotic X-ray system. METHODS Wrist, elbow and ankle joints of two cadaveric specimens were examined in a laboratory setup with different combinations of prefiltration (copper, tin), tube voltage and current-time product. Image quality was assessed subjectively by five radiologists with Fleiss' kappa being computed to measure interrater agreement. To provide a semiquantitative criterion for image quality, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared for standardized regions of interest. Volume CT dose indices were calculated for a 16 cm polymethylmethacrylate phantom. RESULTS Radiation dose ranged from 17.4 mGy in the clinical standard protocol without tin filter to as low as 0.7 mGy with tin prefiltration. Image quality ratings and CNR for tin-filtered scans with 100 kV were lower than for 80 kV studies with copper prefiltration despite higher dose (11.2 and 5.6 vs. 4.5 mGy; p < 0.001). No difference was ascertained between 100 kV scans with tin filtration and 60 kV copper-filtered scans with 75% dose reduction (subjective: p = 0.101; CNR: p = 0.706). Fleiss' kappa of 0.597 (95% confidence interval 0.567-0.626; p < 0.001) indicated moderate interrater agreement. CONCLUSION Considerable dose reduction is feasible with tin prefiltration, however, the twin-robotic X-ray system's low-dose potential for extremity 3D imaging is maximized with a dedicated low-kilovolt scan protocol in situations without extensive beam-hardening artifacts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Low-kilovolt imaging with copper prefiltration provides a superior trade-off between dose reduction and image quality compared to tin-filtered cone-beam CT scan protocols with higher tube voltage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Luetkens
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - H Huflage
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - A S Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - L Ritschl
- X-ray Products - Research & Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstraße 1, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
| | - M Herbst
- X-ray Products - Research & Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstraße 1, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
| | - S Kappler
- X-ray Products - Research & Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstraße 1, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
| | - S Ergün
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Koellikerstraße 6, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - L Goertz
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - L Pennig
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - T A Bley
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - T Gassenmaier
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - J-P Grunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dose reduction potential in cone-beam CT imaging of upper extremity joints with a twin robotic x-ray system. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20176. [PMID: 34635787 PMCID: PMC8505435 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99748-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography is a powerful tool for 3D imaging of the appendicular skeleton, facilitating detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture. This study evaluated various combinations of acquisition and reconstruction parameters for the cone-beam CT mode of a twin robotic x-ray system in cadaveric wrist and elbow scans, aiming to define the best possible trade-off between image quality and radiation dose. Images were acquired with different combinations of tube voltage and tube current-time product, resulting in five scan protocols with varying volume CT dose indices: full-dose (FD; 17.4 mGy), low-dose (LD; 4.5 mGy), ultra-low-dose (ULD; 1.15 mGy), modulated low-dose (mLD; 0.6 mGy) and modulated ultra-low-dose (mULD; 0.29 mGy). Each set of projection data was reconstructed with three convolution kernels (very sharp [Ur77], sharp [Br69], intermediate [Br62]). Five radiologists subjectively assessed the image quality of cortical bone, cancellous bone and soft tissue using seven-point scales. Irrespective of the reconstruction kernel, overall image quality of every FD, LD and ULD scan was deemed suitable for diagnostic use in contrast to mLD (very sharp/sharp/intermediate: 60/55/70%) and mULD (0/3/5%). Superior depiction of cortical and cancellous bone was achieved in FDUr77 and LDUr77 examinations (p < 0.001) with LDUr77 scans also providing favorable bone visualization compared to FDBr69 and FDBr62 (p < 0.001). Fleiss' kappa was 0.618 (0.594-0.641; p < 0.001), indicating substantial interrater reliability. In this study, we demonstrate that considerable dose reduction can be realized while maintaining diagnostic image quality in upper extremity joint scans with the cone-beam CT mode of a twin robotic x-ray system. Application of sharper convolution kernels for image reconstruction facilitates superior display of bone microarchitecture.
Collapse
|