Differentiation of bone metastases from benign red marrow depositions of the spine: the role of fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging compared to fat fraction map

Does the presence of macroscopic intralesional fat exclude malignancy? An analysis of 613 histologically proven malignant bone lesions

OBJECTIVE

To determine if macroscopic intralesional fat detected in bone lesions on CT by Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement and on MRI by macroscopic assessment excludes malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive CT-guided core needle biopsies (CNB) of non-spinal bone lesions performed at a tertiary center between December 2005 and September 2021 were reviewed. Demographic and histopathology data were recorded. All cases with malignant histopathology were selected, and imaging studies were reviewed. Two independent readers performed CT HU measurements on all bone lesions using a circular region of interest (ROI) to quantitate intralesional fat density (mean HU < -30). MRI images were reviewed to qualitatively assess for macroscopic intralesional fat signal in a subset of patients. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

In 613 patients (mean age 62.9 years (range 19-95 years), 47.6% female), CT scans from the CNB of 613 malignant bone lesions were reviewed, and 212 cases had additional MRI images. Only 3 cases (0.5%) demonstrated macroscopic intralesional fat on either CT or MRI. One case demonstrated macroscopic intralesional fat density on CT in a case of metastatic prostate cancer. Two cases demonstrated macroscopic intralesional fat signal on MRI in cases of chondrosarcoma and osteosarcoma. Inter-reader agreement was excellent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.95-0.98; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.90-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Malignant lesions rarely contain macroscopic intralesional fat on CT or MRI. While CT is effective in detecting macroscopic intralesional fat in primarily lytic lesions, MRI may be better for the assessment of heterogenous and infiltrative lesions with mixed lytic and sclerotic components.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Macroscopic intralesional fat is rarely seen in malignant bone tumors and its presence can help to guide the diagnostic workup of bone lesions.

KEY POINTS

• Presence of macroscopic intralesional fat in bone lesions has been widely theorized as a sign of benignity, but there is limited supporting evidence in the literature. • CT and MRI are effective in evaluating for macroscopic intralesional fat in malignant bone lesions with excellent inter-reader agreement. • Macroscopic intralesional fat is rarely seen in malignant bone lesions.

Physiological gradient in lumbar spine fat fraction and R2* and its impact on osteoporosis diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow adiposity and R2* have been explored as an imaging biomarker for osteoporosis. Chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) is a method that allows for relatively accurate measurement of adiposity and R2* in bone marrow in a simple manner. Additionally, there are reports of a physiological gradient of fat distribution in the lumbar spine. This physiological gradient of fat distribution can potentially impact the prediction of osteoporosis. Furthermore, the distribution of R2* is not well understood.

PURPOSE

This study examined how lumbar spine fat fraction (FF) and R2* change with different levels of the lumbar spine, how they influence osteoporosis prediction, and how they change according to measurement methods.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study included patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and lumbar spine CSE-MRI within one-month intervals between 2017 and 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reproducibility of FF and R2* based on measurement techniques, changes in FF and R2* according to vertebral level and osteoporosis status, and diagnostic power of osteoporosis based on vertebral level.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into the normal bone density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups based on bone mineral density. The relationship between groups and spine level before and after BMD adjustment was investigated using generalized estimating equations. Comparisons between the three groups and various measures of reliability were conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performance for predicting osteoporosis was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Comparing the three groups, FF increased with osteoporosis severity, while R2* decreased (p<.001). The intra/inter-rater agreement for FF and R2* was excellent. A physiological gradient within individuals was observed, where FF increased towards the lower lumbar spine (p=.002). R2* tended to decrease, but it was not statistically significant (p=.218). There was no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of osteoporosis based on FF or R2* across different lumbar spine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increase in FF and a decrease in R2* from T12 to L5. However, the predictive power of osteoporosis did not significantly differ between each level.

Differentiation of bone metastases from benign red marrow depositions: utilizing qualitative and quantitative analysis of conventional T1-weighted imaging and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVES

To distinguish bone metastases (BMs) from benign red marrow depositions (BRMs) by qualitative and quantitative analyses of T1-weighted imaging and fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2 FS).

METHODS

For 75 lesions including 38 BMs and 37 BRMs, two radiologists independently evaluated magnetic resonance images by qualitative (signal intensity [SI] of lesions compared to that of normal muscle [NM] or normal bone marrow [NBM]) and quantitative (parameters of the region of interests in the lesions, including T1 ratio [T1 SI ratio of lesion and NM], T2FMu ratio [T2 FS SI ratio of lesion and NM], and T2FMa ratio [T2 FS SI ratio of lesion and NBM]) analyses.

RESULTS

Hyperintensity relative to NM or NBM on T2 FS was more frequent in BMs than in BRMs (100% vs 59.5%-78.4%, respectively; P ≤ 0.001) but also was present in more than half of BRMs. All quantitative parameters showed a significant difference between BMs and BRMs (T1 ratio, 1.075 vs 1.227 [P = 0.002]; T2FMu ratio, 2.094 vs 1.282 [P < 0.001]; T2FMa ratio, 3.232 vs 1.810 [P < 0.001]). The receiver operating characteristics areas under the curves of T2FMu and T2FMa ratios were clinically useful (0.781 and 0.841, respectively) and did not demonstrate statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative analysis of T2 FS facilitates distinguishing between BMs and BRMs, regardless of whether the reference was NM or NBM.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Quantitative parameters derived from T2 FS facilitate differentiation of BMs BRMs without additional scans. The role of NBM as an internal standard for T2 FS to differentiate between BMs and BRMs is similar to that of NM.

Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Imaging in the Prediction of Distinct Granulation Patterns of Somatotroph Adenomas

OBJECTIVE

The heterogeneity of the somatotroph adenomas, especially for sparsely granulated (SG) and densely granulated (DG) subtypes, has attracted great attention in identifying their imaging biomarker. The purpose of the current study was to compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for preoperatively distinguishing the granulation patterns of somatotroph adenomas.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with a clinical diagnosis of somatotroph adenomas from October 2018 to March 2023 were included in this study. Coronal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and T2-weighted MRI sequence data were collected from 3.0T MRI and compared between SG and DG groups. The immunohistochemistry was used to confirm the electron microscopy pathologic subtypes and Ki67 expression levels of somatotroph adenomas postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients in the SG group had significantly higher signal intensity (SI) ratio of DWI (rDWI) (P < 0.001), lower SI ratio of apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) (P < 0.001), and higher SI ratio of T2-weighted imaging (P = 0.011). The combined diagnosis index of rDWI and rADC had the highest diagnostic efficiency in predicting SG adenomas (sensitivity, 93.3%; specificity, 88.2%; P < 0.001). The rDWI and rADC values had positive and negative correlations with the Ki67 index and tumor maximum diameter, respectively. Lower rADC×103 was an independent predictor for SG adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that compared with previously used T2-weighted imaging, the DWI sequence, especially the combined diagnosis index of rDWI and rADC, could more efficiently distinguish the granulation patterns of somatotroph adenomas preoperatively.

Evaluation of Three Imaging Methods to Quantify Key Events in Pelvic Bone Metastasis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to compare turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted images in radial trajectory (BLADE DWI) with multi-shot echoplanar imaging (RESOLVE DWI) for imaging the metastatic lesion in the pelvic bone to find a correlation between ADC values and standardized uptake values (SUVs) of FDG uptake in PET/CT. The study also seeks to compare the values of metastatic lesions with those of benign bone lesions, specifically red marrow hyperplasia.

METHODS

The retrospective IRB-approved study included patients with bone metastasis and red marrow hyperplasia in the pelvic bone who underwent 3.0 T MRI with BLADE/RESOLVE DWI sequences and F-18 FDG PET/CT within one month. BVC (best value comparator) was used in determining the nature of bone lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV) were measured by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. MRI image quality was graded with a Likert scale regarding the visualization of the sacroiliac joint, sacral neural foramen, hamstring tendon at ischial tuberosity, and tumor border. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and imaging time were compared between the two DWIs. Mean, peak, and maximum SUVs between metastatic and benign red marrow lesions were compared. SUVs and ADC values were compared. AUROC analyses and cut-off values were obtained for each parameter. Mann-Whitney U, Spearman's rho, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were applied using SPSS.

RESULTS

The final study group included 58 bone lesions (19 patients (male: female = 6:13, age 52.5 ± 9.6, forty-four (75.9%) bone metastasis, fourteen (24.1%) benign red marrow hyperplasia). ADCs from BLADE and RESOLVE were significantly higher in bone metastasis than red marrow hyperplasia. BLADE showed higher ADC values, higher anatomical scores, and higher SNR than RESOLVE DWI (p < 0.05). Imaging times were longer for BLADE than RESOLVE (6 min 3 s vs. 3 min 47 s, p < 0.05). There was a poor correlation between ADC values and SUVs (correlation coefficient from 0.04 to 0.31). The AUROC values of BLADE and RESOLVE MRI ranged from 0.892~0.995. Those of PET ranged from 0.877~0.895. The cut-off ADC values between the bone metastasis and red marrow hyperplasia were 355.0, 686.5, 531.0 for BLADE min, max, and average, respectively, and 112.5, 737.0, 273.0 for RESOLVE min, max, and average, respectively. The cut-off SUV values were 1.84, 5.01, and 3.81 for mean, peak, and max values, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RESOLVE DWI, BLADE DWI showed improved image quality of pelvic bone MRI in the aspect of anatomical depiction and SNR, higher ADC values, albeit longer imaging time. BLADE and RESOLVE could differentiate bone metastasis and red marrow hyperplasia with quantifiable cut-off values. Further study is necessary to evaluate the discrepancy between the quantifiers between PET and MRI.

[Imaging Findings of Spinal Metastases with Differential Diagnosis: Focusing on Solitary Spinal Lesion in Older Patients]

If a solitary spinal lesion is found in an older patient, bone metastasis can be primarily considered as the diagnosis. Bone metastasis can occur anywhere, but it mostly occurs in the vertebral body and may sometimes show typical imaging findings, presenting as a single lesion. Therefore, differentiating it from other lesions that mimic bone metastases can be challenging, potentially leading to delayed diagnosis and initiation of primary cancer treatment. This review provides an overview of imaging findings and clinical guidelines for bone metastases and discusses its differences from other diseases that can occur as solitary spinal lesions in older patients.