1
|
Marth AA, Goller SS, Kajdi GW, Marcus RP, Sutter R. Photon-Counting Detector CT: Clinical Utility of Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging Combined With Tin Prefiltration to Reduce Metal Artifacts in the Postoperative Ankle. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:545-553. [PMID: 38214560 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and clinical utility of virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstructions in computed tomography (CT) scans with and without tin prefiltration on a photon-counting detector (PCD) CT system to reduce metal implant artifacts in the postoperative ankle. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included patients with internal fixation of the ankle scanned with and without tin prefiltration (Sn) on a PCD CT scanner between March and October 2023. Virtual monoenergetic images between 60 and 190 keV were reconstructed with a 10-keV increment in a bone kernel for both acquisitions (VMI Sn and VMI Std , respectively). Noise measurements assessed artifact reduction in the most prominent near-metal image distortions and were compared between acquisitions modes as well as between polychromatic images and VMIs. Three readers assessed the visibility of osseous healing along with interpretability and artifact extent for 5 reconstruction levels. RESULTS A total of 48 patients (21 females, 27 males; mean age, 55.1 ± 19.4 years) were included in this study. Tin-prefiltered acquisitions (n = 30) had a lower artifact level for polychromatic images and VMIs compared with non-tin-prefiltered acquisitions (n = 18; P ≤ 0.043). A significant reduction of metal artifacts was observed for VMI Sn ≥120 keV compared with polychromatic images (hyperdense artifacts: 40.2 HU [interquartile range (IQR) 39.8] vs 14.0 HU [IQR 11.1]; P ≤ 0.01 and hypodense artifacts: 91.2 HU [IQR 82.4] vs 29.7 HU [IQR 39.6]; P ≤ 0.001). For VMI Std , this applied to reconstructions ≥100 keV (hyperdense artifacts: 57.7 HU [IQR 33.4] vs 19.4 HU [IQR 27.6]; P ≤ 0.001 and hypodense artifacts: 106.9 HU [IQR 76.1] vs 57.4 HU [IQR 55.7]; P ≤ 0.021). For visibility of osseous healing, VMI Sn at 120 keV yielded higher ratings compared with polychromatic images ( P ≤ 0.001), whereas image interpretability was rated better ( P = 0.023), and artifact extent was rated lower ( P ≤ 0.001) compared with polychromatic images. CONCLUSIONS Tin-prefiltered VMI at 120 keV showed a significant reduction in metal artifacts compared with polychromatic images, whereas visibility of osseous healing and image interpretability was improved. Therefore, tin-prefiltration PCD CT with VMI reconstructions may be a helpful complement to postsurgical CT imaging of the ankle in patients with metal implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian A Marth
- From the Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Balgrist Campus AG, Zurich, Switzerland (A.A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (A.A.M., S.S.G., G.W.K., R.P.M., R.S.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grunz JP, Huflage H. Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Experience in Musculoskeletal Imaging. Korean J Radiol 2024; 25:662-672. [PMID: 38942460 PMCID: PMC11214923 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Since the emergence of the first photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system in late 2021, its advantages and a wide range of applications in all fields of radiology have been demonstrated. Compared to standard energy-integrating detector-CT, PCCT allows for superior geometric dose efficiency in every examination. While this aspect by itself is groundbreaking, the advantages do not stop there. PCCT facilitates an unprecedented combination of ultra-high-resolution imaging without dose penalty or field-of-view restrictions, detector-based elimination of electronic noise, and ubiquitous multi-energy spectral information. Considering the high demands of orthopedic imaging for the visualization of minuscule details while simultaneously covering large portions of skeletal and soft tissue anatomy, no subspecialty may benefit more from this novel detector technology than musculoskeletal radiology. Deeply rooted in experimental and clinical research, this review article aims to provide an introduction to the cosmos of PCCT, explain its technical basics, and highlight the most promising applications for patient care, while also mentioning current limitations that need to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Peter Grunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Henner Huflage
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quintiens J, van Lenthe GH. Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Microstructural Imaging of Bone and Joints. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2024:10.1007/s11914-024-00876-0. [PMID: 38833188 DOI: 10.1007/s11914-024-00876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recently, photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has been introduced in clinical research and diagnostics. This review describes the technological advances and provides an overview of recent applications with a focus on imaging of bone. RECENT FINDINGS PCCT is a full-body scanner with short scanning times that provides better spatial and spectral resolution than conventional energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT), along with an up to 50% reduced radiation dose. It can be used to quantify bone mineral density, to perform bone microstructural analyses and to assess cartilage quality with adequate precision and accuracy. Using a virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction, metal artefacts can be greatly reduced when imaging bone-implant interfaces. Current PCCT systems do not allow spectral imaging in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode. Given its improved resolution, reduced noise and spectral imaging capabilities PCCT has diagnostic capacities in both qualitative and quantitative imaging that outperform those of conventional CT. Clinical use in monitoring bone health has already been demonstrated. The full potential of PCCT systems will be unlocked when UHR spectral imaging becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jilmen Quintiens
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pallasch FB, Rau A, Reisert M, Rau S, Diallo T, Stein T, Faby S, Bamberg F, Weiss J. Photon-counting detector computed tomography for metal artifact reduction: a comparative study of different artifact reduction techniques in patients with orthopedic implants. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:890-900. [PMID: 38689182 PMCID: PMC11168992 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01822-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Artifacts caused by metallic implants remain a challenge in computed tomography (CT). We investigated the impact of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for artifact reduction in patients with orthopedic implants with respect to image quality and diagnostic confidence using different artifact reduction approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective study, consecutive patients with orthopedic implants underwent PCD-CT imaging of the implant area. Four series were reconstructed for each patient (clinical standard reconstruction [PCD-CTStd], monoenergetic images at 140 keV [PCD-CT140keV], iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) corrected [PCD-CTiMAR], combination of iMAR and 140 keV monoenergetic [PCD-CT140keV+iMAR]). Subsequently, three radiologists evaluated the reconstructions in a random and blinded manner for image quality, artifact severity, anatomy delineation (adjacent and distant), and diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent). In addition, the coefficient of variation [CV] and the relative quantitative artifact reduction potential were obtained as objective measures. RESULTS We enrolled 39 patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 13.2 years (51%; n = 20 male) and a mean BMI of 26.1 ± 4 kg/m2. All image quality measures and diagnostic confidence were significantly higher for the iMAR vs. non-iMAR reconstructions (all p < 0.001). No significant effect of the different artifact reduction approaches on CV was observed (p = 0.26). The quantitative analysis indicated the most effective artifact reduction for the iMAR reconstructions, which was higher than PCD-CT140keV (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION PCD-CT allows for effective metal artifact reduction in patients with orthopedic implants, resulting in superior image quality and diagnostic confidence with the potential to improve patient management and clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Bernhard Pallasch
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rau
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Marco Reisert
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Stephan Rau
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Thierno Diallo
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Thomas Stein
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Sebastian Faby
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Siemensstr. 3, 91301, Forchheim, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Jakob Weiss
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Goller SS, Sutter R. Advanced Imaging of Total Knee Arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2024; 28:282-292. [PMID: 38768593 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1781470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The prevalence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing with the aging population. Although long-term results are satisfactory, suspected postoperative complications often require imaging with the implant in place. Advancements in computed tomography (CT), such as tin prefiltration, metal artifact reduction algorithms, dual-energy CT with virtual monoenergetic imaging postprocessing, and the application of cone-beam CT and photon-counting detector CT, allow a better depiction of the tissues adjacent to the metal. For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), high bandwidth (BW) optimization, the combination of view angle tilting and high BW, as well as multispectral imaging techniques with multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination or slice encoding metal artifact correction, have significantly improved imaging around metal implants, turning MRI into a useful clinical tool for patients with suspected TKA complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Samira Goller
- Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Reto Sutter
- Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bette S, Risch F, Becker J, Popp D, Decker JA, Kaufmann D, Friedrich L, Scheurig-Münkler C, Schwarz F, Kröncke TJ. Photon-counting detector CT - first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024. [PMID: 38788741 DOI: 10.1055/a-2312-6914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
The introduction of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) marks a remarkable leap in innovation in CT imaging. The new detector technology allows X-rays to be converted directly into an electrical signal without an intermediate step via a scintillation layer and allows the energy of individual photons to be measured. Initial data show high spatial resolution, complete elimination of electronic noise, and steady availability of spectral image data sets. In particular, the new technology shows promise with respect to the imaging of osseous structures. Recently, PCD-CT was implemented in the clinical routine. The aim of this review was to summarize recent studies and to show our first experiences with photon-counting detector technology in the field of musculoskeletal radiology.We performed a literature search using Medline and included a total of 90 articles and reviews that covered recent experimental and clinical experiences with the new technology.In this review, we focus on (1) spatial resolution and delineation of fine anatomic structures, (2) reduction of radiation dose, (3) electronic noise, (4) techniques for metal artifact reduction, and (5) possibilities of spectral imaging. This article provides insight into our first experiences with photon-counting detector technology and shows results and images from experimental and clinical studies. · This review summarizes recent experimental and clinical studies in the field of photon-counting detector CT and musculoskeletal radiology.. · The potential of photon-counting detector technology in the field of musculoskeletal radiology includes improved spatial resolution, reduction in radiation dose, metal artifact reduction, and spectral imaging.. · PCD-CT enables imaging at lower radiation doses while maintaining or even enhancing spatial resolution, crucial for reducing patient exposure, especially in repeated or prolonged imaging scenarios.. · It offers promising results in reducing metal artifacts commonly encountered in orthopedic or dental implants, enhancing the interpretability of adjacent structures in postoperative and follow-up imaging.. · With its ability to routinely acquire spectral data, PCD-CT scans allow for material classification, such as detecting urate crystals in suspected gout or visualizing bone marrow edema, potentially reducing reliance on MRI in certain cases.. Bette S, Risch F, Becker J et al. Photon-counting detector CT - first experiences in the field of musculoskeletal radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2312-6914.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Bette
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Franka Risch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Judith Becker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Popp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Josua A Decker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - David Kaufmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Lena Friedrich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian Scheurig-Münkler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Institute of Conventional and Interventional Radiology, Donauisar Hospital Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Thomas J Kröncke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Centre for Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences (CAAPS), University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klempka A, Schröder A, Neumayer P, Groden C, Clausen S, Hetjens S. Cranial Computer Tomography with Photon Counting and Energy-Integrated Detectors: Objective Comparison in the Same Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1019. [PMID: 38786317 PMCID: PMC11119038 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
This study provides an objective comparison of cranial computed tomography (CT) imaging quality and radiation dose between photon counting detectors (PCCTs) and energy-integrated detectors (EIDs). We retrospectively analyzed 158 CT scans from 76 patients, employing both detector types on the same individuals to ensure a consistent comparison. Our analysis focused on the Computed Tomography Dose Index and the Dose-Length Product together with the contrast-to-noise ratio and the signal-to-noise ratio for brain gray and white matter. We utilized standardized imaging protocols and consistent patient positioning to minimize variables. PCCT showed a potential for higher image quality and lower radiation doses, as highlighted by this study, thus achieving diagnostic clarity with reduced radiation exposure, underlining its significance in patient care, particularly for patients requiring multiple scans. The results demonstrated that while both systems were effective, PCCT offered enhanced imaging and patient safety in neuroradiological evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Klempka
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alexander Schröder
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Neumayer
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Groden
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sven Clausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jankowski PP, Chan JP. Advances in Imaging (Intraop Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Synthetic Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, Low-Dose Protocols). Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:161-172. [PMID: 38423732 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Spine surgery has seen a rapid advance in the refinement and development of 3-dimensional and nuclear imaging modalities in recent years. Cone-beam CT has proven to be a valuable tool for improving the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. The use of synthetic CT and low-dose CT have also emerged as modalities which allow for little to no radiation while streamlining imaging workflows. Bone scans also serve to provide functional information about bone metabolism in both the preoperative and postoperative monitoring phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel P Jankowski
- Hoag Spine Center, 520 Superior Avenue, #300, Newport Beach, CA 92663, USA.
| | - Justin P Chan
- University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Selles M, Wellenberg RHH, Slotman DJ, Nijholt IM, van Osch JAC, van Dijke KF, Maas M, Boomsma MF. Image quality and metal artifact reduction in total hip arthroplasty CT: deep learning-based algorithm versus virtual monoenergetic imaging and orthopedic metal artifact reduction. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:31. [PMID: 38480603 PMCID: PMC10937891 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00427-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare image quality, metal artifacts, and diagnostic confidence of conventional computed tomography (CT) images of unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients (THA) with deep learning-based metal artifact reduction (DL-MAR) to conventional CT and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR). METHODS Conventional CT and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without O-MAR and DL-MAR images of 28 unilateral THA patients were reconstructed. Image quality, metal artifacts, and diagnostic confidence in bone, pelvic organs, and soft tissue adjacent to the prosthesis were jointly scored by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between bladder and fat and muscle and fat were measured. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction were used. RESULTS Significantly higher image quality, higher diagnostic confidence, and less severe metal artifacts were observed on DL-MAR and images with O-MAR compared to images without O-MAR (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Higher image quality, higher diagnostic confidence for bone and soft tissue adjacent to the prosthesis, and less severe metal artifacts were observed on DL-MAR when compared to conventional images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with O-MAR (p ≤ 0.014). CNRs were higher for DL-MAR and images with O-MAR compared to images without O-MAR (p < 0.001). Higher CNRs were observed on DL-MAR images compared to conventional images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with O-MAR (p ≤ 0.010). CONCLUSIONS DL-MAR showed higher image quality, diagnostic confidence, and superior metal artifact reduction compared to conventional CT images and 130-keV monoenergetic images with and without O-MAR in unilateral THA patients. RELEVANCE STATEMENT DL-MAR resulted into improved image quality, stronger reduction of metal artifacts, and improved diagnostic confidence compared to conventional and virtual monoenergetic images with and without metal artifact reduction, bringing DL-based metal artifact reduction closer to clinical application. KEY POINTS • Metal artifacts introduced by total hip arthroplasty hamper radiologic assessment on CT. • A deep-learning algorithm (DL-MAR) was compared to dual-layer CT images with O-MAR. • DL-MAR showed best image quality and diagnostic confidence. • Highest contrast-to-noise ratios were observed on the DL-MAR images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Selles
- Department of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Ruud H H Wellenberg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Derk J Slotman
- Department of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M Nijholt
- Department of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Kees F van Dijke
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, 1815 JD, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Maas
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fukuda T, Yonenaga T, Akao R, Hashimoto T, Maeda K, Shoji T, Shioda S, Ishizaka Y, Ojiri H. Comparison of Bone Evaluation and Metal Artifact between Photon-Counting CT and Five Energy-Integrating-Detector CT under Standardized Conditions Using Cadaveric Forearms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:350. [PMID: 38396389 PMCID: PMC10888094 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the potential of various bone evaluations by considering photon-counting CT (PCCT) and multiple energy-integrating-detector CT (EIDCT), including three dual-energy CT (DECT) scanners with standardized various parameters in both standard resolution (STD) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) modes. METHODS Four cadaveric forearms were scanned using PCCT and five EIDCTs, by applying STD and UHR modes. Visibility of bone architecture, image quality, and a non-displaced fracture were subjectively scored against a reference EIDCT image by using a five-point scale. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also compared. To assess metal artifacts, a forearm with radial plate fixation was scanned by with and without Tin filter (Sn+ and Sn-), and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 120 keV was created. Regarding Sn+ and VMI, images were only obtained from the technically available scanners. Subjective scores and the areas of streak artifacts were compared. RESULTS PCCT demonstrated significantly lower noise (p < 0.001) and higher bone SNR and CNR (p < 0.001) than all EIDCTs in both resolution modes. However, there was no significant difference between PCCT and EIDCTs in almost all subjective scores, regardless of scan modes, except for image quality where a significant difference was observed, compared to several EIDCTs. Metal artifact analysis revealed PCCT had larger artifact in Sn- and Sn+ (p < 0.001), but fewer in VMIs than three DECTs (p < 0.001 or 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Under standardized conditions, while PCCT had almost no subjective superiority in visualizing bone structures and fracture line when compared to EIDCTs, it outperformed in quantitative analysis related to image quality, especially in lower noise and higher tissue contrast. When using PCCT to assess cases with metal implants, it may be recommended to use VMIs to minimize the possible tendency for artifact to be pronounced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Fukuda
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Takenori Yonenaga
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Ryo Akao
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Tohru Hashimoto
- Department of Anatomy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Maeda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Shoji
- Department of Radiology, Tha Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center, 6-41-2 Aoto, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 125-8506, Japan
| | - Shoichi Shioda
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yu Ishizaka
- Medicalscanning Tokyo, 3-1-17 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan
| | - Hiroya Ojiri
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chamberlin JH, Smith CD, Maisuria D, Parrish J, van Swol E, Mah E, Emrich T, Schoepf UJ, Varga-Szemes A, O'Doherty J, Munden RF, Tipnis SV, Baruah D, Kabakus IM. Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography of the lungs: Phantom and clinical assessment of radiation dose and image quality. Clin Imaging 2023; 104:110008. [PMID: 37862910 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced noise reduction, spatial resolution, and image quality in comparison to energy-integrated-detectors CT (EID-CT). These hypothesized improvements were compared using PCD-CT ultra-high (UHR) and standard-resolution (SR) scan-modes. METHODS Phantom scans were obtained with both EID-CT and PCD-CT (UHR, SR) on an adult body-phantom. Radiation dose was measured and noise levels were compared at a minimum achievable slice thickness of 0.5 mm for EID-CT, 0.2 mm for PCD-CT-UHR and 0.4 mm for PCD-CT-SR. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for five tissue densities. Additionally, data from 25 patients who had PCD-CT of chest were reconstructed at 1 mm and 0.2 mm (UHR) slice-thickness and compared quantitatively (SNR) and qualitatively (noise, quality, sharpness, bone details). RESULTS Phantom PCD-CT-UHR and PCD-CT-SR scans had similar measured radiation dose (16.0mGy vs 15.8 mGy). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) (9.0HU vs 9.6HU). PCD-CT-UHR (0.2 mm) had slightly higher noise level (11.1HU). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had higher SNR in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) while achieving higher resolution (Bone 115 vs 96, Acrylic 14 vs 14, Polyethylene 11 vs 10). SNR was slightly lower across all densities for PCD-CT UHR (0.2 mm). Interestingly, CNR was highest in the 0.2 mm PCD-CT group; PCD-CT CNR was 2.45 and 2.88 times the CNR for 0.5 mm EID-CT for acrylic and poly densities. Clinical comparison of SNR showed predictably higher SNR for 1 mm (30.3 ± 10.7 vs 14.2 ± 7, p = 0.02). Median subjective ratings were higher for 0.2 mm UHR vs 1 mm PCD-CT for nodule contour (4.6 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), bone detail (5 ± 0 vs 4 ± 0.1, p = 0.001), image quality (5 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), and sharpness (5 ± 0.1 vs 4 ± 0.2). CONCLUSION Both UHR and SR PCD-CT result in similar radiation dose levels. PCD-CT can achieve higher resolution with lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan H Chamberlin
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Carter D Smith
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Dhruw Maisuria
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Joe Parrish
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Elizabeth van Swol
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Eugene Mah
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Medical Physics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Tilman Emrich
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - U Joseph Schoepf
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Akos Varga-Szemes
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Jim O'Doherty
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA; Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA
| | - Reginald F Munden
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Sameer V Tipnis
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Medical Physics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Dhiraj Baruah
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA
| | - Ismail M Kabakus
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29407, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Björkman AS, Malusek A, Gauffin H, Persson A, Koskinen SK. Spectral photon-counting CT: Image quality evaluation using a metal-containing bovine bone specimen. Eur J Radiol 2023; 168:111110. [PMID: 37788519 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To find the optimal imaging parameters for a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and to compare it to an energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in terms of image quality and metal artefact severity using a metal-containing bovine knee specimen. METHODS A bovine knee with a stainless-steel plate and screws was imaged in a whole-body research PCD-CT at 120 kV and 140 kV and in an EID dual-source CT (DSCT) at Sn150 kV and 80/Sn150 kV. PCD-CT virtual monoenergetic 72 and 150 keV images and EID-CT images processed with and without metal artefact reduction algorithms (iMAR) were compared. Four radiologists rated the visualisation of bony structures and metal artefact severity. The Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni's correction were used. P-values of ≤ 0.0001 were considered statistically significant. Distributions of HU values of regions of interest (ROIs) in artefact-affected areas were analysed. RESULTS PCD-CT 140 kV 150 keV images received the highest scores and were significantly better than EID-CT Sn150 kV images. PCD-CT 72 keV images were rated significantly lower than all the others. HU-value variation was larger in the 120 kV and the 72 keV images. The ROI analysis revealed no large difference between scanners regarding artefact severity. CONCLUSION PCD-CT 140 kV 150 keV images of a metal-containing bovine knee specimen provided the best image quality. They were superior to, or as good as, the best EID-CT images; even without the presumed advantage of tin filter and metal artefact reduction algorithms. PCD-CT is a promising method for reducing metal artefacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Sofi Björkman
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Radiology in Linköping, Center for Diagnostics, Röntgenkliniken, Universitetssjukhuset, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Alexandr Malusek
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Håkan Gauffin
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Orthopedics, Linköping University, Universitetssjukhuset, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Anders Persson
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Radiology in Linköping, Center for Diagnostics, Röntgenkliniken, Universitetssjukhuset, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Seppo K Koskinen
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden; Terveystalo Inc., Jaakonkatu 3, 00100 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Division for Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu Y, Ye Z, Chen J, Deng L, Song B. Photon Counting CT: Technical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Future Prospects. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:2362-2382. [PMID: 37369618 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) is a new technique that utilizes photon-counting detectors to convert individual X-ray photons directly into an electrical signal, which can achieve higher spatial resolution, improved iodine signal, radiation dose reduction, artifact reduction, and multienergy imaging. This review introduces the technical principles of PCCT, and summarizes its first-in-human experience and current applications in clinical settings, and discusses the future prospects of PCCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyi Wu
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China (Y.Y.W., Z.Y., J.C., L.P.D., B.S.)
| | - Zheng Ye
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China (Y.Y.W., Z.Y., J.C., L.P.D., B.S.)
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China (Y.Y.W., Z.Y., J.C., L.P.D., B.S.)
| | - Liping Deng
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China (Y.Y.W., Z.Y., J.C., L.P.D., B.S.)
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China (Y.Y.W., Z.Y., J.C., L.P.D., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Sanya People' s Hospital, Sanya, Hainan, China (B.S.).
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hermann KGA, Diekhoff T. [Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging : Pros and cons in axial spondyloarthritis]. Z Rheumatol 2023; 82:638-645. [PMID: 37815608 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-023-01415-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis depends on direct visualization of the sacroiliitis in addition to clinical assessment and determination of the histocompatibility antigen HLA-B27. While the value of conventional radiographic images has meanwhile been described in many studies as insufficient to diagnose the disease at an early stage, magnetic resonance imaging and also computed tomography now offer the possibility to visualize findings, such as bone marrow edema, erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis. Thus, it is necessary to decide which procedure should be used and when. Furthermore, both cross-sectional imaging techniques are currently undergoing major changes, and technical advancements are making great strides every year. This article provides an overview of which future technologies will be included in the rheumatological diagnostics of the sacroiliac joints. This overview also illustrates which standard methods are established in the diagnostics of axial spondyloarthritis and how they are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Geert A Hermann
- Klinik für Radiologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Torsten Diekhoff
- Klinik für Radiologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Di Dier K, Deppe D, Diekhoff T, Herregods N, Jans L. Clash of the titans: Current CT and CT-like imaging modalities in sacroiliitis in spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101876. [PMID: 37953120 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Sacroiliitis is characterised by active and structural changes of the joint. While the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria stress the importance of bone marrow inflammation, recent reports suggest that osteitis can occur in various diseases, mechanical conditions and healthy individuals. Thus, structural lesions such as joint surface erosion and ankylosis are important factors for differential diagnosis. Various imaging modalities are available to examine these changes. However, computed tomography (CT) is generally considered the reference standard. Nonetheless, recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow for direct bone imaging and the reconstruction of CT-like images that can provide similar information. This way, the ability of MRI to detect and measure structural lesions is strengthened. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pros and cons of CT and CT-like imaging modalities in sacroiliitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Di Dier
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | - Dominik Deppe
- Department of Radiology (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt - Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Unversität Berlin, Charitéplaz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Torsten Diekhoff
- Department of Radiology (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Humboldt - Universität Zu Berlin, Freie Unversität Berlin, Charitéplaz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nele Herregods
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | - Lennart Jans
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Popp D, Sinzinger AX, Decker JA, Braun F, Bette S, Risch F, Haerting M, Garthe T, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Kroencke TJ, Schwarz F. Spectral metal artifact reduction after posterior spinal fixation in photon-counting detector CT datasets. Eur J Radiol 2023; 165:110946. [PMID: 37399668 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the usefulness of virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstructions derived from scans on a novel photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) for artifact reduction in patients after posterior spinal fixation. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 23 patients status post posterior spinal fixation. Subjects were scanned on a novel PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) as part of routine clinical care. 14 sets of VMI reconstructions were derived in 10 keV increments for the interval 60-190 keV. The mean and the standard deviation (SD) of CT-values in 12 defined locations around a pair of pedicle screws on one vertebral level and the SD of homogenous fat were measured and used to calculate an artifact index (AIx). RESULTS Averaged over all regions, the lowest AIx was observed at VMI levels of 110 keV (32.5 (27.8-37.9)) which was significantly different from those of VMIs ≤ 90 keV (p < 0.001) or ≥160 keV (p < 0.015), respectively. Overall AIx values increased in both lower- and higher-keV levels. Regarding individual locations, either a monotonous AIx-decrease for increasing keV values or an AIx-minimum in intermediate-keV levels (100-140 keV) was found. In locations adjacent to larger metal parts, the increase of AIx values at the high-end of the keV spectrum was mainly explained by a reappearance of streak artifacts. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that 110 keV is the optimal VMI setting for overall artifact suppression. In specific anatomical regions, however, slight adjustments towards higher-keV levels may provide better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Popp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Andrea X Sinzinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Josua A Decker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Franziska Braun
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Bette
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Franka Risch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Mark Haerting
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Tarik Garthe
- Department of Trauma, Orthopedics, Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Christian Scheurig-Muenkler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Thomas J Kroencke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; Institute for Radiology, DONAUISAR Hospital Deggendorf-Dingolfing-Landau, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany; Medical Faculty, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Bavariaring 19, 80336 Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Demehri S, Baffour FI, Klein JG, Ghotbi E, Ibad HA, Moradi K, Taguchi K, Fritz J, Carrino JA, Guermazi A, Fishman EK, Zbijewski WB. Musculoskeletal CT Imaging: State-of-the-Art Advancements and Future Directions. Radiology 2023; 308:e230344. [PMID: 37606571 PMCID: PMC10477515 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
CT is one of the most widely used modalities for musculoskeletal imaging. Recent advancements in the field include the introduction of four-dimensional CT, which captures a CT image during motion; cone-beam CT, which uses flat-panel detectors to capture the lower extremities in weight-bearing mode; and dual-energy CT, which operates at two different x-ray potentials to improve the contrast resolution to facilitate the assessment of tissue material compositions such as tophaceous gout deposits and bone marrow edema. Most recently, photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been introduced. PCCT is a technique that uses photon-counting detectors to produce an image with higher spatial and contrast resolution than conventional multidetector CT systems. In addition, postprocessing techniques such as three-dimensional printing and cinematic rendering have used CT data to improve the generation of both physical and digital anatomic models. Last, advancements in the application of artificial intelligence to CT imaging have enabled the automatic evaluation of musculoskeletal pathologies. In this review, the authors discuss the current state of the above CT technologies, their respective advantages and disadvantages, and their projected future directions for various musculoskeletal applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadpour Demehri
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Francis I. Baffour
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Joshua G. Klein
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Elena Ghotbi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Hamza Ahmed Ibad
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Kamyar Moradi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Katsuyuki Taguchi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - John A. Carrino
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Ali Guermazi
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| | - Wojciech B. Zbijewski
- From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological
Science (S.D., J.G.K., E.G., H.A.I., K.M., K.T., E.K.F.) and Department of
Biomedical Engineering (W.B.Z.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
601 N Carolina St, Baltimore, MD 21287; Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging,
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (F.I.B.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
(J.A.C.); and Department of Radiology, Quantitative Imaging Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|