Diffusion-weighted imaging for determining response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Precision of liver and pancreas apparent diffusion coefficients using motion-compensated gradient waveforms in DWI

BACKGROUND

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with optimized motion-compensated gradient waveforms reduces signal dropouts in the liver and pancreas caused by cardiovascular-associated motion, however its precision is unknown. We hypothesized that DWI with motion-compensated DW gradient waveforms would improve apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-repeatability and inter-reader reproducibility compared to conventional DWI in these organs.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, prospective, single center study, subjects recruited between October 2019 and March 2020 were scanned twice on a 3 T scanner, with repositioning between test and retest. Each scan included two respiratory-triggered DWI series with comparable acquisition time: 1) conventional (monopolar) 2) motion- compensated diffusion gradients. Three readers measured ADC values. One-way ANOVA, Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eight healthy participants (4 male/4 female), with a mean age of 29 ± 4 years, underwent the liver and pancreas MRI protocol. Four patients with liver metastases (2 male/2 female) with a mean age of 58 ± 5 years underwent the liver MRI protocol. In healthy participants, motion-compensated DWI outperformed conventional DWI with mean repeatability coefficient of 0.14 × 10-3 (CI:0.12-0.17) vs. 0.31 × 10-3 (CI:0.27-0.37) mm2/s for liver, and 0.11 × 10-3 (CI:0.08-0.15) vs. 0.34 × 10-3 (CI:0.27-0.49) mm2/s for pancreas; and with mean reproducibility coefficient of 0.20 × 10-3 (CI:0.18-0.23) vs. 0.51 × 10-3 (CI:0.46-0.58) mm2/s for liver, and 0.16 × 10-3 (CI:0.13-0.20) vs. 0.42 × 10-3 (CI:0.34-0.52) mm2/s for pancreas. In patients, improved repeatability was observed for motion-compensated DWI in comparison to conventional with repeatability coefficient of 0.51 × 10- 3 mm2/s (CI:0.35-0.89) vs. 0.70 × 10-3 mm2/s (CI:0.49-1.20).

CONCLUSION

Motion-compensated DWI enhances the precision of ADC measurements in the liver and pancreas compared to conventional DWI.

Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning.

Review aims and findings

This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested.

Conclusion

Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.

A Phase Ib Expansion Cohort Evaluating Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib and Dual TORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

This study further evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of alisertib and sapanisertib in an expansion cohort of patients, including a subset of patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with further evaluation of the pharmacodynamic characteristics of combination therapy.

METHODS

Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors and 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib and sapanisertib. Adverse events and disease response were assessed. Patients in the expansion cohort were treated with a 7-day lead-in of either alisertib or sapanisertib prior to combination therapy, with tumor tissue biopsy and serial functional imaging performed for correlative analysis.

RESULTS

Toxicity across treatment groups was overall similar to prior studies. One partial response to treatment was observed in a patient with ER positive breast cancer, and a patient with pancreatic cancer experienced prolonged stable disease. In an additional cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment response was modest. Correlative analysis revealed variability in markers of apoptosis and immune cell infiltrate according to lead-in therapy and response.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual targeting of Aurora A kinase and mTOR resulted in marginal clinical benefit in a population of patients with refractory solid tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, though individual patients experienced significant response to therapy. Correlatives indicate apoptotic response and tumor immune cell infiltrate may affect clinical outcomes.