Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT?

The value of CTPA for diagnosing acute pulmonary thromboembolism and the ensuing right ventricular dysfunction

The value of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for the diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) subsequent to acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The ultrasonic cardiography (UCG) was used to assess RVD, one of the diagnostic criteria of PE caused hemodynamic collapse. Seventy six patients with confirmed PE were divided into massive (52 cases) and non-massive PE group (24 cases). The diagnostic criteria assessed for the imminent RVD were: (1) the ratio of axial diameters of the right and left ventricular chambers (RVd/LVd) exceeding 1, or (2) the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter measuring >30 mm. The CTPA diagnosed RVD was positive in 36 and negative in 40 cases. The RVD assessed by UCG was positive in 31 and negative in 45 cases. In comparison to UCG, the CTPA results UCG exhibited 96.77 % sensitivity 96.77 % and 86.67 specificity. The evaluated values both of these techniques were found in good agreement by the kappa value (κ) of 0.81, P < 0.001. In 52 cases of massive PE, CTPA determined RVD was positive in 34, and negative in 18 cases. In comparison, UCG diagnosed RVD was positive in 31 and negative in 21 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of CTPA results compared to those of UCG were 91.18 and 85.71 %, respectively. The estimates obtained were in good agreement as indicated by 0.88 κ value and P < 0.001. Twenty four cases of non-massive PE were RVD negative when assessed by CTPA, UCG however showed two cases positive in this group. Compared to UCG, the specificity of CTPA in evaluating RVD was 100 %. In the massive PE group, the average estimate of RVd/LVd ratio was significantly higher than 1 as analyzed by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test (P < 0.001). The CTPA and UCG results showed a good correlation in massive PE cases. However, in non-massive PE group, results from two techniques were not correlated. The CTPA can accurately and reliably diagnose the PE and ensuing by estimating changes in the anatomical parameters of right ventricle. Hence, it can allow prompt diagnosis and an appropriate treatment leading to an improved prognosis.

Clinical consequences of an indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram in cancer patients

Our aim was to evaluate clinical management and outcomes in cancer patients who had an indeterminate Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) for the assessment of pulmonary embolus. We reviewed 1000 CTPA studies and identified 251 limited (indeterminate) CTPA. We examined follow-up imaging and reviewed clinical management decisions and any positive diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) within the subsequent 90 days. 60 patients (23.9%) had a follow-up imaging study within five days. 8 had a positive study for VTE disease within 5 days. 3 patients (1.2%) were placed on anticoagulation therapy based on the limited CT result.

Imaging diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism represents a major public healthcare problem and it also imposes frequent clinical diagnostic issues. Despite the availability of the D-dimer tests, imaging remains the mainstay for its diagnosis. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is now the most widely used diagnostic test and its utility has been well validated in a large number of trials. Nuclear medicine techniques, which are also well established, are now used significantly less frequently. Magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography is developing as an alternative to CTPA in patients who have contraindications to iodinated contrast media. Catheter pulmonary angiography remains the gold standard, although it is being used increasingly less frequently. In this article, we review the current knowledge on the imaging diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism with special emphasis on the noninvasive techniques.

Pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains one of the most challenging medical diseases in the emergency department. PE is a potentially life threatening diagnosis that is seen in patients with chest pain and/or dyspnea but can span the clinical spectrum of medical presentations. In addition, it does not have any particular clinical feature, laboratory test, or diagnostic modality that can independently and confidently exclude its possibility. This article offers a review of PE in the emergency department. It emphasizes the appropriate determination of pretest probability, the approach to diagnosis and management, and special considerations related to pregnancy and radiation exposure.

The value of 64-detector row computed tomography for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism

Recently, a diagnostic strategy using a clinical decision rule, D-dimer testing and spiral computed tomography (CT) was found to be effective in the evaluation of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the rate of venous thromboembolic complications in the three-month follow-up of patients with negative CT was still substantial and included fatal events. It was the objective to evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulants after a normal 64-detector row CT (64-DCT) scan from a cohort of patients with suspected PE. A total of 545 consecutive patients with clinically suspected first episode of PE and either likely pre-test probability of PE (using the simplified Wells score) or unlikely pre-test probability in combination with a positive D-dimer underwent a 64-DCT. 64-DCT scanning was inconclusive in nine patients (1.6%), confirmed the presence of PE in 169 (31%), and ruled out the diagnosis in the remaining 367. During the three-month follow-up of the 367 patients one developed symptomatic distal deep-vein thrombosis (0.27%; 95%CI, 0.0 to 1.51%) and none developed PE (0 %; 95%CI, 0 to 1.0%). We conclude that 64-DCT scanning has the potential to safely exclude the presence of PE virtually in all patients presenting with clinical suspicion of this clinical disorder.

Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli diagnosed by multidetector CT pulmonary angiography

INTRODUCTION

CT Pulmonary Angiography has been shown to be equivalent to Ventilation/ Perfusion scanning in 3-month outcome studies, but it detects more pulmonary emboli. Isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli are thought to account for some of the increase in diagnosis, but it is not known whether these emboli represent a harbinger for future thromboembolic events. The objective of this study was to determine the 3-month clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients diagnosed with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review of 10,453 consecutive CTPA radiology reports over 74-month period since the implementation of Multidetector CT Pulmonary Angiography identified a cohort of 93 patients found to have acute pulmonary embolism isolated to subsegmental pulmonary arteries without other evidence of deep venous thrombosis at one institution. The study measured 3-month clinical outcomes (anticoagulation use, recurrence, death, hemorrhage) determined by review of records and telephone interviews with physicians.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (76%) were treated with anticoagulation and/or IVC filter, while 22 (24%) were observed without therapy. One patient (1/93, 1.05%; 95% CI: 0-6.6%) who was treated with anticoagulants and a vena caval filter had a recurrent subsegmental pulmonary embolus. No patients died of pulmonary embolism. There were 8 hemorrhages, including 5 (5.3%) major hemorrhages without any hemorrhage-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli have favorable 3-month outcomes. Short-term prognosis for recurrent thromboembolism may be lower than the risk of adverse events with anticoagulation in patients at high risk of hemorrhage.

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography: an assessment of the radiology report

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the uncertainty in computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) radiology reports, manifested by descriptions of report limitations and image quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CTPA reports between 2004 and 2006 were reviewed for patient demographic data (age, gender, pregnancy state), radiologist data (years of experience, subspecialty, final dictation by an attending radiologist vs a resident being present and dictating the report), the presence of pulmonary embolism (PE), and key words describing examination quality and limitations.

RESULTS

There were 2151 CTPA reports. Patterns of reporting CTPA in the impression sections of radiology reports were as follows: (1) PE conclusively positive (10%), (2) PE conclusively negative (29%), (3) PE negative to segmental arteries (27%), (4) PE negative to central pulmonary arteries (21%), (5) PE negative but suboptimal examination (8%), and (6) nondiagnostic examination (5%). Among the last three categories, seven PEs were not initially diagnosed but were found on subsequent imaging examinations. Limitations in image quality, respiratory motion artifact, and contrast enhancement were most frequently mentioned as limitations in image quality (62% and 28% of all reports, respectively). Radiologists tended to report limitations in image quality if they were thoracic radiology subspecialists, had >10 years of experience, or worked independently (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Different patterns of reporting CTPA exist and vary on the basis of individual radiologists' subspecialties, experience, and whether they work independently or with residents. Certain wording regarding the presence of PE may falsely imply negativity of PE in a limited examination.

The role of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

From a radiological point of view, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has effectively become the de-facto first-line imaging test for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE), as patients with a high-quality negative CTPA do not require further examination or treatment for suspected PE. We are likely to see further technical developments in CT technology in the near future. These advances will most likely further improve image quality. Several questions or issues remain, including strategies for further imaging when CT is inconclusive or contraindicated, issues regarding radiation exposure, the prevalence of PE in specific populations, best tests and pathways in specific patient groups, including patients with specific comorbidities such as oncology patients or patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Also, the question whether all PE patients need anticoagulation, the clinical effect of follow-up imaging, and the accuracy of different clinical prediction rules, remains.

Ventilation/perfusion lung scintigraphy: what is still needed? A review considering technetium-99m-labeled macro-aggregates of albumin

Lung perfusion scintigraphy (LPS) with technetium-99m-labeled macro-aggregates of albumin (Tc-99m-MAA) is well established in the diagnostic of pulmonary embolism (PE). In the last decade, it was shown that single-photon emission computer tomography (SPECT) acquisition of LPS overcame static scintigraphy. Furthermore, there are rare indications for LPS, such as preoperative quantification of regional lung function prior to lung resection or transplantation, optimization of lung cancer radiation therapy, quantification of right-left shunt, planning of intra-arterial chemotherapy, and several rare indications in pediatrics. Moreover, LPS with Tc-99m-MAA is a safe method with low radiation exposure. PE can also be diagnosed by spiral computer tomography (CT), ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, or pulmonary angiography (PA, former gold standard). The present review considers all these methods, especially spiral CT, and compares them with LPS with respect to sensitivity and specificity and gives an overview of established and newer publications. It shows that LPS with Tc-99m-MAA represents a diagnostic method of continuing value for PE. In comparison with spiral CT and/or PA, LPS is not to be defeated as mentioned also by the most actual Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II reports. This applies in particular to chronic or recurring embolisms, whereas currently spiral CT may be of greater value for major or life-threatening embolisms. At present, LPS cannot be replaced by other methods in some applications, such as pediatrics or in the quantification of regional pulmonary function in a preoperative context or prior to radiation therapy. LPS still has a place in the diagnostics of PE and is irreplaceable in several rare indications as described earlier.

Withholding anticoagulation after a negative computed tomography pulmonary angiogram as a stand-alone imaging investigation: a prospective management study

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is essential and it is not clear whether a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) could be used as a stand-alone imaging investigation. The aim of the study was to test the accuracy of the clinical outcome of a negative CTPA as a stand-alone imaging investigation to exclude PE.

METHODS

Five hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients who had a CTPA for diagnosis or exclusion of PE were recruited from March 2003 to October 2004. Four hundred and ninety-four patients had a helical CTPA as a stand-alone imaging investigation for diagnosis or exclusion of PE. A 3-month post-CTPA follow up was carried out in all patients to establish the clinical outcome accuracy of a negative CTPA as a stand-alone imaging investigation.

RESULTS

There were 387 (78.3%) negative and 107 (21.7%) positive CTPA examinations. The average age of the patients was 57.16 years (standard deviation 18.57). Among those with a negative CTPA who survived, one patient had deep vein thrombosis and 342 patients had no evidence of an episode of venous thromboembolism or PE at the 3-month follow up. Thirty-eight patients died within the 3-month follow-up period and one patient's death was attributed to suspected PE. The negative predictive value of a CTPA is 99.5% (95% confidence interval 98.1-99.9%).

CONCLUSION

Helical negative CTPA examination excludes clinically significant PE as a stand-alone imaging investigation. Where concurrent deep vein thrombosis is suspected, lower limb needs to be imaged by ultrasound if the CTPA is negative.

Pulmonary embolism: accuracy and safety of a negative CT pulmonary angiogram and value of a negative D-dimer assay to exclude CT pulmonary angiogram-detectable pulmonary embolism

This is a retrospective study to determine the accuracy and safety of a negative CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) based on clinical outcome and to determine the usefulness of a negative D-dimer assay before CTPA. A total of 483 patients with a negative CTPA study were followed up for 3 months, with the aim of detecting episodes of venous thromboembolism and mortality. Three hundred and forty-nine patients had an immunochromatographic D-dimer assay called 'Simplify', carried out before a CTPA examination. Seventy-eight patients had a negative D-dimer assay and a negative CTPA. Three patients had a negative D-dimer assay and a positive CTPA. All three patients had a moderate pretest clinical probability. Of the 483 patients who had a negative CTPA and a 3-month follow up, 444 (92%) were alive and 39 (8%) had died. Of the 444 patients who were alive, none had any further suspected episode of thromboembolism or had received anticoagulation therapy within the follow-up period. Of those who died, none of the deaths was thought to be as a result of pulmonary embolism (PE). Single-detector helical CT can be used safely as the primary diagnostic test to evaluate PE. Negative Simplify D-dimer assay and low pretest clinical probability exclude CTPA-detectable PE, and a CTPA is unnecessary in this cohort of patients.

Pulmonary Artery CTA

The latest with the introduction of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), CT has been firmly established as the modality of choice for imaging the pulmonary arteries, particularly as the de facto first line test for imaging patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Before the introduction of MDCT, remaining concerns regarding CTs accuracy for diagnosis of isolated peripheral emboli had prevented the unanimous acceptance of this test as the reference standard for imaging PE. After a decade of uncertainty, there is now conclusive evidence that CT, if positive, provides reliable confirmation of the presence of PE and, more importantly, if negative effectively rules out clinically significant PE. Current endeavors to streamline and facilitate workflow for CT diagnosis of PE will further improve the acceptance, utility, and importance of this test. Examples include improvements in workflow, CT derivation of right ventricular function parameters for triage and prognostication of patients with acute PE and the comprehensive assessment of patients with acute chest pain for PE, coronary disease, aortic disease, and pulmonary disease by means of a single, contrast enhanced, ECG-synchronized CT scan. Although the diagnosis or exclusion of acute PE is the most common and important application of CT pulmonary angiography, the ease of scan acquisition and the high spatial resolution of modern CT techniques make this test ideally suited for the greatest majority of congenital and acquired, acute and chronic disorders of the pulmonary arteries.

Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Imaging in the Emergency Department

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition that requires accurate diagnostic imaging. Morbidity and mortality that result from PE can be reduced significantly if appropriate treatment is initiated early; this makes timely diagnosis imperative. Historically, the gold standard for the imaging of PE has been pulmonary angiography. Rapid advances in radiology and nuclear medicine have led to this modality largely being replaced by noninvasive techniques, most frequently multidetector helical CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). In cases in which CTPA is contraindicated, other modalities for diagnosis of PE include nuclear ventilation perfusion scanning, magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography, duplex Doppler ultrasonography for deep venous thrombosis, and echocardiography. This article reviews the literature on the role of these imaging modalities in the diagnosis of PE.

Acute pulmonary embolism: correlation of CT pulmonary artery obstruction index with blood gas values

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to investigate the relation between the pulmonary artery obstruction index assessed with helical CT and impairment in blood gases in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Helical CT pulmonary angiography was performed in 78 patients who were suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism and selected as being free of underlying cardiopulmonary disease. Findings consistent with acute pulmonary embolism were observed in 34 patients. The severity was assessed by the pulmonary artery obstruction index, defined as Sigma (n x d), where n is the number of segmental arteries occluded and d is the degree of obstruction. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between the index of arterial obstruction and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (Pao(2)); alveolar-arterial difference in partial pressure of oxygen (Pao(2)-Pao(2)); arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Paco(2)); and arterial oxygen saturation (Sao(2)). The statistical difference of the arterial blood gas values between the two groups of patients (those with and those without pulmonary embolism) was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Blood gases were comparatively evaluated below and above different index values (from 40% to 70%) and different Paco(2) values (25, 30, and 35 mm Hg) as possible indexes of embolism severity using the same test. The level of significance was set at 95% (p = 0.05).

RESULTS

The values of Pao(2), Sao(2), and Paco(2) were significantly lower (p = 0.024, p = 0.0062, and p = 0.000075, respectively) and the values of Pao(2)-Pao(2) were significantly higher (p = 0.0169) in the pulmonary embolism group than in the no-pulmonary-embolism group. A significant correlation was observed between the obstruction index and Pao(2) (r = -0.33, p = 0.05), Paco(2) (r = -0.34, p = 0.05), Pao(2)-Pao(2) (r = 0.39, p = 0.02), and Sao(2) (r = -0.35, p = 0.04). Using cutoff values for the pulmonary artery obstruction index of 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70%, we observed that Paco(2) and Pao(2)-Pao(2) differed significantly between above and below the 40% (p = 0.018 and p = 0.03), 50% (p = 0.0087 and p = 0.029), and 60% (p = 0.005 and p = 0.003) cutoffs. Pao(2) differed significantly for the cutoff values of 60% (p = 0.03) and 70% (p = 0.004). The same was observed for Sao(2) at 60% (p = 0.05) and 70% (p = 0.03). Comparisons for Paco(2) showed that a value of 30 mm Hg significantly separates levels of the pulmonary artery obstruction index (p = 0.002), with 78% sensitivity and 82% specificity indicating a pulmonary artery obstruction index greater than 50%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute pulmonary embolism but no other underlying cardiopulmonary disease, the severity of the pulmonary arterial tree obstruction assessed using the CT obstruction index is significantly correlated to the blood gas values. The strongest correlation was observed between the index and the Pao(2)-Pao(2). Furthermore, a Paco(2) value of 30 mm Hg or less is highly suggestive of an obstruction index of more than 50% of the arterial bed.

Diagnosis of suspected venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy

Venous thromboembolic disease is a leading cause of maternal mortality during pregnancy. Early and accurate radiological diagnosis is essential as anticoagulation is not without risk and clinical diagnosis is unreliable. Although the disorder is potentially treatable, unnecessary treatment should be avoided. Most of the diagnostic imaging techniques involve ionizing radiation which exposes both the mother and fetus to finite radiation risks. There is a relative lack of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians and radiologists on the most appropriate method of assessing this group of patients. This article will review the role of imaging of suspected venous thromboembolic disease in pregnant patients, highlight contentious issues such as radiation risk, intravenous contrast use in pregnancy and discuss the published guidelines, as well as suggesting an appropriate imaging algorithm based on the available evidence.

The Age of CT Pulmonary Angiography

With the introduction of multi detector-row CT (MDCT), computed tomography (CT) has been firmly established as the de facto first line test for imaging patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, remaining concerns regarding CT's accuracy for diagnosis of isolated peripheral emboli have prevented the unanimous acceptance of this test as the standard of reference for imaging PE. Consequently, many patients with a chest CT scan negative for PE undergo additional testing for a definitive rule-out of PE, increasing radiation burden, risk of complications, and health care cost. After a decade of uncertainty, there is now conclusive evidence that computed tomography (CT), if positive, provides reliable confirmation of the presence of PE and, more importantly, if negative effectively rules out clinically significant PE. Current endeavors to streamline and facilitate workflow for CT diagnosis of PE will further improve the acceptance, utility, and importance of this test. Thus, rather than seeking further confirmation for the accuracy of CT for PE diagnosis, future efforts ought to be directed at harnessing the unique strengths of this test. Examples include improvements in workflow, CT derivation of right ventricular function parameters for triage and prognostication of patients with acute PE, and the comprehensive assessment of patients with acute chest pain for PE, coronary disease, aortic disease, and pulmonary disease by means of a single, contrast enhanced, ECG-synchronized CT scan. At the same time, efforts must be directed at refining clinical pathways to ensure appropriate use and avoid overutilization of this test.

Barometric Pressure and the Incidence of Pulmonary Embolism

OBJECTIVES

Reports in the literature suggest that weather changes may play a role in venous thrombotic disease. An increase in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) during the spring season led us to investigate the relationship between atmospheric pressure (AP) and the incidence of PE, as diagnosed in most of the patients by helical CT angiography, and in the minority of patients by conventional pulmonary angiography and lung scanning.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the charts of 91 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of PE who were evaluated by the Department of Pulmonary Medicine between August 2000 and September 2004. We documented AP changes as recorded by the Erzurum Provincial Department of Meteorology. Of the 91 patients, the diagnosis of PE was made by helical CT angiography in 84 patients, isotope lung scan in 5 patients, and conventional pulmonary angiography in 2 patients.

RESULTS

More patients presented in the spring months (March, n = 15; April, n = 10; and May, n = 12) than during other seasons (p < 0.001). The frequency of PE was inversely related to general average AP (r = - 0.70; p < 0.01). When the average seasonal AP was correlated with the incidence of PE, however, the relationship was found to not be statistically significant (r = - 0.66; p = 0.34). There was no correlation between the severity of PE or mortality and AP.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PE was significantly higher in the spring months, when AP was low. A regional study to capture all PE patients will need to be done to confirm our findings. Other meteorologic factors should be investigated regarding their effect on thromboembolic disease.

Safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients who have clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and negative results on helical computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Several studies have focused on the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy in patients with negative results on helical computed tomography (CT). However, these studies were either retrospective or had a selection bias, since spiral CT was performed only in selected patients. Moreover, no special attention has been directed towards an alternative diagnosis which might explain patients' signs and symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety of withholding anticoagulants in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and negative CT results when ultrasonography (US) was performed only in patients with clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Another goal was to evaluate the effect of CT findings on the final clinical diagnosis.

METHODS

Among 192 consecutive patients who underwent CT for possible acute PE, 98 patients had negative images and 88 of them-- without clinical suspicion of DVT-- were prospectively followed up for 3 months for evidence of subsequent thromboembolic disease. They did not receive anticoagulation. Clinical probability of PE was assessed applying the Geneva score. These patients were also classified into several diagnostic categories according to the CT findings and clinical presentation. In addition, all patients who were alive (or a member of his or her family) were interviewed by phone once the last patient's follow-up was completed.

RESULTS

One patient was lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 87 patients (35 with low, 47 with intermediate and 5 with high clinical probability), subsequent thromboembolic disease was found in 1 (1.1%; 95%CI: 0.03-6.2%). Two patients died during the follow-up period, but no deaths were attributed to PE. Alternative diagnoses were: nonspecific thoracic pain (43.3%), nonspecific pleuritis (19.5%), pneumonia (18.4%), other (18.8%). The telephone survey was performed in 74 patients (median follow-up: 11 months; range: 4-23). None of them had newly diagnosed episodes of PE and none of them had received anticoagulation for any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitations of a small single-center series, our data suggest that withholding anticoagulation in patients with suspected acute PE and negative CT results appears to be safe when the clinical probability of PE is assessed as low or intermediate. This technique also provides useful information to pose an alternative diagnosis. US could be avoided in patients without clinical suspicion of DVT.

Management of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by D-dimer and multi-slice computed tomography in outpatients: an outcome study

OBJECTIVES

A prospective outcome study designed to evaluate a simple strategy for the management of outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), based on clinical probability, D-dimer, and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT).

METHODS

A cohort of 432 consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected PE was managed by sequential non-invasive testing. Patients in whom PE was ruled out were not given anticoagulants, but were followed-up for 3 months.

RESULTS

Normal D-dimer and low-intermediate clinical probability ruled out PE in 103 patients [24% (95% CI 20-28)]. Seventeen patients had normal D-dimer, but high clinical probability and proceeded to MSCT. All patients proved negative for PE. A total of 329 (76%) patients underwent MSCT examination. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 93 patients [21.5% (95% CI 18-26)] and was ruled out by negative MSCT in 221 patients [51% (95% CI 46-56)]. MSCT scans were determined as inconclusive in 15 (4.5%) patients. No patient developed objectively verified venous thromboembolism (VTE) during the 3-month follow-up period. However, the cause of death was adjudicated as possibly related to PE in two patients, resulting in an overall 3-month VTE risk of 0.6% (95% CI 0-2.2%). The diagnostic algorithm yielded a definite diagnosis in 96.5% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple and non-invasive strategy combining clinical probability, D-dimer, and MSCT for the management of outpatients with suspected PE appears to be safe and effective.

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: time to rewrite the textbooks

Computed tomography (CT) is rapidly becoming the first line modality for imaging pulmonary embolism (PE). However, limitations for the accurate diagnosis of small peripheral emboli have prevented the unanimous acceptance of CT as the new standard of reference for imaging PE although the actual significance of the detection and treatment of isolated peripheral emboli is uncertain. At the same time the high negative predictive value of CT pulmonary angiography for excluding clinically significant PE has been established in retrospective and prospective studies. The introduction of multidetector-row spiral CT has greatly improved visualization of peripheral pulmonary arteries and detection of small emboli. Previous concerns regarding the accuracy of spiral CT for the accurate diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary emboli should thus be overcome. Multidetector-row spiral CT has become a widely available and cost-effective modality, which has surpassed other imaging modalities for PE diagnosis to a point where over-utilization may become of concern. Our most immediate goal must be to educate our referring colleagues about these important transitions so that the diagnostic algorithm in patients with suspected acute PE is updated to accurately reflect our current diagnostic prowess in medical imaging.

Diagnostic methods in pulmonary embolism

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging since clinical signs and symptoms are non-specific. The diagnostic tests available for demonstrating PE all have their drawbacks and are often costly and consume considerable amounts of resources. Simple tools that have become available in the last several years include clinical prediction rules and D-dimer testing. Assessment of the clinical probability, combined with a D-dimer test, can limit the need for additional diagnostic tests by 30%. For outpatients with a normal, sensitive ELISA D-dimer test and a low-to-moderate clinical probability, PE can safely be ruled out. Pulmonary angiography, though still the gold standard, is rarely used nowadays because of its invasiveness, its high costs and limited availability, and the declining experience of radiologists with the technique. Two imaging techniques--lung scintigraphy and helical CT--are the diagnostic methods of choice. A normal perfusion lung scan can safely exclude PE. However, 55-65% of patients have indeterminate lung scan results, making additional imaging tests necessary. Helical CT is increasingly being used as the first-line test because it can directly visualize a thromboembolus, it can suggest an alternative diagnosis, and there is excellent inter-observer agreement. A normal helical CT, followed by compression ultrasonography of the leg veins, can safely rule out PE. Finally, the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment from patients with a normal multi-row detector helical CT as the sole test has not yet been demonstrated.

Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we review the current role of CT pulmonary angiography and indirect CT venography for the evaluation of pulmonary thromboembolic disease.

CONCLUSION

With advances in MDCT technology, evaluation of pulmonary thromboembolic disease can now be performed with combined CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography as a "one-stop-shopping" test. CT pulmonary angiography is cost-effective, is accurate, has high interobserver agreement, and has an added advantage of detecting other life-threatening diseases in the chest that mimic pulmonary embolism.

Current trends in thrombolysis: implications for diagnostic and interventional radiology

Current trends in thrombolysis are of relevance to both diagnostic and interventional radiologists. In addition to the traditional use of thrombolytic therapy in conditions such as peripheral arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolic disease, more recent interest has focused on the potential use of thrombolysis in acute stroke. There will be significant implications for the provision of radiological services if current trials show a favourable outcome for thrombolysis in stroke. This article looks at a range of conditions in which thrombolysis may be useful, on the strength of currently available evidence. Future trends will depend on the outcomes of the current trials.

Multislice computed tomography perfusion imaging for visualization of acute pulmonary embolism: animal experience

The purpose of our animal study was to evaluate a new computed tomography (CT) subtraction technique for visualization of perfusion defects within the lung parenchyma in subsegmental pulmonary embolism (PE). Seven healthy pigs were entered into a prospective trial. Acute PE was artificially induced by fresh clot material prior to the CT scans. Within a single breath-hold, whole thorax CT scans were performed with a 16-slice multidetector-row CT scanner (SOMATOM Sensation 16; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) before and after intravenous application of 80 ml of contrast medium with a flow rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a saline chaser. The scan parameters were 120 kV and 100 mAs(eff), using a thin collimation of 16x0.75 mm and a table speed/rotation of 15-18 mm (pitch, 1.25-1.5; rotation time, 0.5 s). Axial source images were reconstructed with an effective slice thickness of 1 mm (overlap, 30%). A new automatic subtraction technique was used. After 3D segmentation of the lungs in the plain and contrast-enhanced series, threshold-based extraction of major airways and vascular structures in the contrast images was performed. This segmentation was repeated in the plain CT images segmenting the same number of vessels and airways as in the contrast images. Both scans were registered onto each other using nonrigid registration. After registration both image sets were filtered in a nonlinear fashion excluding segmented airways and vessels. After subtracting the plain CT data from the contrast data the resulting enhancement images were color-encoded and overlaid onto the contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) images. This color-encoded combined display of parenchymal enhancement of the lungs was evaluated interactively on a workstation (Leonardo, Siemens) in axial, coronal and sagittal plane orientations. Axial contrast-enhanced CTA images were rated first, followed by an analysis of the combination images. Finally, CTA images were reread focusing on areas with perfusion deficits indicating PE on the color-coded enhancement display. Subtraction was feasible for all seven studies. In one animal, opacification of the pulmonary arteries was suboptimal owing to heart insufficiency. In the remaining six pigs, a total of 37 perfusion defects were clearly assessable downstream of occluded subsegmental arteries, showing lower or missing enhancement compared with normally perfused lung parenchyma. Indeterminate findings from CTA showed typical PE perfusion defects in four out of six cases on CT subtraction. Additionally, 22 peripheral triangular-shaped enhancement defects were delineated. Nine of these findings were reclassified as definitely being caused by PE on second reading of the CTA data sets. Our initial results have shown that this new subtraction technique for perfusion imaging of PE is feasible, using routine contrast delivery. Dedicated examination protocols are mandatory for adequate opacification of the pulmonary arteries and for optimization of data sets for subsequent subtraction. Perfusion imaging allows a comprehensive assessment of morphology and function, providing more accurate information on acute PE.

The role of helical CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism is problematic since clinical signs and symptoms of PE are aspecific. Diagnostic algorithms have been developed to rationalize the use of imaging tests in patients with a clinical suspicion of PE. An algorithm based on helical CT has gained widespread interest due to the availability of helical CT. However, these algorithms have often been implemented without appropriate assessment in clinical practice. If one is to implement helical CT as a first line diagnostic test for patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism it is important to note that a) CT is sensitive to larger emboli b) single slice technology may miss smaller subsegmental pulmonary emboli and c) outcome studies using a combination of normal single slice helical CT and normal compression ultrasonography rules out safely pulmonary embolism. In view of recent developments in multi row detector CT technology, large, well-designed studies are needed to determine the exact role of multi row helical CT in diagnosing PE.

CT imaging in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic strategies

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTA) has increasingly become accepted as a widely available, safe, cost-effective, and accurate method for a quick and comprehensive diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Pulmonary catheter angiography is still considered the gold standard and final imaging method in many diagnostic algorithms. However, spiral CTA has become established as the first imaging test in clinical routine due to its high negative predictive value for clinically relevant PE. Despite the direct visualization of clot material, depiction of cardiac and pulmonary function in combination with the quantification of pulmonary obstruction helps to grade the severity of PE for further risk stratification and to monitor the effect of thrombolytic therapy. Because PE and deep venous thrombosis are two different aspects of the same disease, additional indirect CT venography may be a valuable addition to the initial diagnostic algorithm-if this was positive for PE-and demonstration of the extent and localization of deep venous thrombosis has an impact on clinical management. Additional and alternate diagnoses add to the usefulness of this method. Using advanced multislice spiral CT technology, some practitioners have advocated CTA as the sole imaging tool for routine clinical assessment in suspected acute PE. This will simplify standards of practice in the near future.

Accuracy of single-detector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with abnormal perfusion scintigraphy

BACKGROUND

Spiral computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a potentially conclusive diagnostic test to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with non-high probability scintigraphy and is already widely used-sometimes as the sole primary diagnostic test in the diagnosis of suspected PE. Its true sensitivity and specificity has, however, not been evaluated previously in a large cohort of consecutive patients.

METHODS

In a multicenter prospective study 627 consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE were studied. Patients with normal perfusion scintigraphy were excluded from further analysis. Single-detector spiral CT scanning and ventilation scintigraphy were then performed in all patients to diagnose PE, while pulmonary angiography was performed as the gold standard. The only exceptions were those patients who had both a high-probability VQ scan and a CT scan positive for PE: these patients were considered to have PE and did not undergo additional pulmonary angiography. All imaging tests were read by independent expert panels.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seventeen patients were available for complete analysis. The prevalence of PE was 32%. Spiral CT correctly identified 88 of 128 patients with PE, and 92 of 109 patients without PE, for a sensitivity and specificity of 69%[95% confidence interval (CI) 63-75] and 84% (95% CI 80-89), respectively. The sensitivity of spiral CT was 86% (95% CI 80-92) for segmental or larger PE and 21% (95% CI 14-29) in the group of patients with subsegmental PE.

CONCLUSION

The overall sensitivity of spiral CT for PE is too low to endorse its use as the sole test to exclude PE. This holds true even if one limits the discussion to patients with larger PE in segmental or larger pulmonary artery branches. We conclude that, in patients with clinically suspected PE and an abnormal perfusion scintigraphy, single-slice detector spiral CT is not sensitive enough to be used as the sole test to exclude PE.

Spiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism

There is still considerable debate about the optimal diagnostic imaging modality for acute pulmonary embolism. If imaging is deemed necessary from an initial clinical evaluation such as d-dimer testing, options include nuclear medicine scanning, catheter pulmonary angiography, and spiral CT. In many institutions, spiral CT is becoming established as the first-line imaging test in daily clinical practice. With spiral CT, thrombus is directly visualized, and both mediastinal and parenchymal structures are evaluated, which may provide important alternative or additional diagnoses. However, limitations for the accurate diagnosis of small peripheral emboli, with a reported miss rate of up to 30% with single-slice spiral CT so far, have prevented the unanimous embrace of spiral CT as the new standard of reference for imaging pulmonary embolism. The clinical significance of the detection and treatment of isolated peripheral pulmonary emboli is uncertain. Evidence is accumulating that it is safe practice to withhold anticoagulation in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism on the basis of a negative spiral CT study. Remaining concerns about the accuracy of spiral CT for pulmonary embolism detection may be overcome by the introduction of multidetector-row spiral CT. This widely available technology has improved visualization of peripheral pulmonary arteries and detection of small emboli. The most recent generation of multidetector-row spiral CT scanners appears to outperform competing imaging modalities for the accurate detection of central and peripheral pulmonary embolism. In this review, we assess the current role and future potential of CT in the diagnostic algorithm of acute pulmonary embolism.

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism

Objective testing for pulmonary embolism is necessary, because clinical assessment alone is unreliable and the consequences of misdiagnosis are serious. No single test has ideal properties (100% sensitivity and specificity, no risk, low cost). Pulmonary angiography is regarded as the final arbiter but is ill suited for diagnosing a disease present in only a third of patients in whom it is suspected. Some tests are good for confirmation and some for exclusion of embolism; others are able to do both but are often non-diagnostic. For optimal efficiency, choice of the initial test should be guided by clinical assessment of the likelihood of embolism and by patient characteristics that may influence test accuracy. Standardised clinical estimates can be used to give a pre-test probability to assess, after appropriate objective testing, the post-test probability of embolism. Multidetector computed tomography can replace both scintigraphy and angiography for the exclusion and diagnosis of this disease and should now be considered the central imaging investigation in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

During the 1990s, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging underwent extensive technological advancement and expanded clinical use in patients with venous thromboembolic disease, particularly with regard to evaluation of the pulmonary vasculature. In many institutions, helical (spiral) CT pulmonary angiography has become the initial imaging study of choice to evaluate patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, supplanting ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. In addition, CT venography of the pelvis and lower extremities is often incorporated into the CT angiography protocol to identify or exclude concurrent deep venous thrombosis. MR pulmonary angiography and MR venography are second-line diagnostic tools because of their higher cost, limited availability, and other logistical constraints. As the technology improves and becomes more widely available, MR imaging may play a greater role in the evaluation of patients with venous thromboembolic disease.

CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art

In daily clinical routine, computed tomography (CT) has practically become the first-line modality for imaging of pulmonary circulation in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE). However, limitations regarding accurate diagnosis of small peripheral emboli have so far prevented unanimous acceptance of CT as the reference standard for imaging of PE. The development of multi-detector row CT has led to improved visualization of peripheral pulmonary arteries and detection of small emboli. The finding of a small isolated clot at pulmonary CT angiography, however, may be increasingly difficult to correlate with results of other imaging modalities, and the clinical importance of such findings is uncertain. Therefore, the most realistic scenario to measure efficacy of pulmonary CT angiography when PE is suspected may be assessment of patient outcome. Meanwhile, the high negative predictive value of a normal pulmonary CT angiographic study and its association with beneficial patient outcome has been demonstrated. While the introduction of multi-detector row technology has improved CT diagnosis of PE, it has also challenged its users to develop strategies for optimized contrast material delivery, reduction of radiation dose, and management of large-volume data sets created at those examinations.

Sensitivity and specificity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism as defined by computed tomographic angiography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination plasma fibrin D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism by using computed tomographic (CT) angiography as the diagnostic reference standard.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1, 1998, to June 26, 2000, patients who had both semiquantitative latex agglutination plasma fibrin D-dimer testing and CT angiography for suspected acute pulmonary embolism were selected for the study. A D-dimer value greater than 250 ng/mL was considered positive for thromboembolic disease. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism was based solely on the interpretation of the CT angiogram. The D-dimer assay results were then compared with the CT angiographic diagnoses.

RESULTS

Of 946 CT studies, 172 (18%) were positive for acute pulmonary embolism. The D-dimer assay was positive for 612 (65%) of the 946 patients. For acute pulmonary embolism, the D-dimer assay had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.88), a specificity of 039 (95% CI, 036-0.43), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.44 (95 % CI, 032-0.62), and a negative predictive value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The semiquantitative latex agglutination plasma fibrin D-dimer assay had moderate sensitivity and low specificity for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. When used alone, the results of this test were insufficient to exclude this serious and potentially fatal disorder. Approximately two thirds of our patients had positive D-dimer assays and required further evaluation to exclude acute pulmonary embolism.

Imaging of acute pulmonary emboli

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after surgical procedures. Early diagnosis and prompt, effective management of this condition present considerable clinical challenges to surgeons. Imaging studies form the mainstay of diagnosis of PE and include plain radiography, ventilation-perfusion scan, venography, echocardiography, catheter pulmonary angiogram, CT pulmonary angiogram, and MR pulmonary angiogram. Each imaging modality has a role in the diagnosis of PE.

ECG-gated multislice spiral CT for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism

AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of echocardiogram (ECG)-gated multi-slice CT angiography (MCTA) in patients with clinical suspicion of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), to investigate the effect of ECG-gating on cardiac motion artefacts, and to determine the diagnostic reader agreement of ECG-gated MCTA in comparison with conventional MCTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly underwent ECG-gated (n=25, group 1) or non-ECG-gated (n=23, group 2) eight-slice pulmonary MCTA. Image data were evaluated by three independent chest radiologists with respect to the presence or absence of emboli at different arterial levels (main, lobar, segmental, and subsegmental arteries), and with regard to cardiac motion artefacts. Statistical tests used to calculate inter-observer agreement were weighted kappa statistics, extended kappa statistics and confidence indices indicating three-reader agreement accuracy.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (56.3%) were diagnosed to have pulmonary embolism (13 from group 1, 14 from group 2). Cardiac motion artefacts were significantly more frequent in group 2 (70% in group 2 versus 13% in group 1, p=0.0001). The overall diagnostic agreement was excellent with both MCTA techniques (three-reader confidence index for all vascular territories: 0.76 and 0.84 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (extended kappa=0.69 and 0.78, respectively); three-reader confidence index for diagnosis of VTE: 0.94 and 0.85 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (extended kappa=0.91 and 0.73, respectively), weighted kappa=0.81-0.83 and 0.92-0.95 for groups 1 and 2, respectively, and did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition there was no significant difference of inter-observer agreement in either group at any assessed pulmonary arterial level.

CONCLUSION

ECG-gated pulmonary MCTA is feasible in patients with clinical suspicion of VTE. However, ECG-gated image acquisition did not influence the diagnostic reader agreement accuracy and inter-observer agreement of MCTA. Hence, it does not appear to be advantageous for the MCTA diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Increased prevalence of coronary artery calcification in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors explored the possibility that patients with suspected pulmonary embolism are at high risk for coronary artery disease. To this purpose, they compared the presence of coronary artery calcification on computed tomography (CT) in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism with age- and gender-matched controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CT scans of 214 patients were reviewed. Of those, 107 consecutive patients (50%) had pulmonary CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE group). The remaining 107 age- and gender-matched patients were scanned for reasons other than pulmonary embolism (non-PE group). All CT scans were performed with the same 8-detector-row multislice scanner. Two radiologists reviewed scans of 5-mm slices using a five-grade modified coronary calcium scoring system: 1 = no calcification; 2 = minimal calcification; 3 = mild calcification; 4 = moderate calcification; and 5 = severe calcification. The Marginal Homogeneity test was used to compare the distribution and severity of calcification in the two groups.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients in the PE group, seven (6.54%) had pulmonary embolism detected on CT. Coronary artery calcification was detected in 61 patients (57%) in the PE group compared with 42 patients (39%) in the non-PE group. The Marginal Homogeneity test showed that patients with pulmonary embolism symptoms were 2.9 times more likely to have calcification detected compared with those patients who had chest CT for some other reason (P = .0034). However, in patients in whom coronary artery calcification was detected, the distribution of severity of calcification was the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Assuming coronary artery calcification indicated coronary atherosclerosis, patients undergoing CT for suspected pulmonary embolism may be at high risk for coronary artery disease.

Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: a question of too much choice?

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is difficult with many patients treated without the disease or left untreated without an adequate diagnostic work up. Recent advances in PE diagnosis are reviewed. The use of risk stratification in PE diagnosis is strongly recommended and evidence on how it can best be performed summarized. The Ginsberg/Wells stratification rule is recommended currently as the best validated rule. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was found to have quite poor sensitivity and to be poorly validated. It is recommended as adequate as a positive test in moderate/high risk groups and an exclusionary test in low risk groups or where an adequate alternative diagnosis is found. For D-Dimer tests the only test with adequate sensitivity and validation in management studies is the VIDASCopyright D-Dimer. This is in low/intermediate risk groups in the ED population. The Simpli-RedCopyright test is also reviewed but is too insensitive for most populations. Echocardiography: this is good in compromised patients as it is a bedside test which when negative virtually excludes PE. If positive in the right setting it has a high positive predictive value. A negative echocardiogram predicts a benign clinical course for PE. The rest of the paper details the authors approach to integrating these new techniques with established algorithms and where progress is likely to occur in the next few years. These include improvements in CTPA (plus the addition of CT venography), new point of care D-Dimer tests, better risk stratification rules and integration of new strategies with artificial neural networks or computerized guidelines.

CT pulmonary angiography and suspected acute pulmonary embolism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use and quality of CT pulmonary angiography in our department, and to relate the findings to clinical parameters and diagnoses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 324 consecutive patients referred to CT pulmonary angiography with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). From the medical records we registered clinical parameters, blood gases, D-dimer, risk factors and the results of other relevant imaging studies.

RESULTS

55 patients (17%) had PE detected on CT. 39 had bilateral PE, and 8 patients had isolated peripheral PE. 87% of the examinations showing PE had satisfactory filling of contrast material including the segmental pulmonary arteries, and 60% of the subsegmental arteries. D-dimer test was performed in 209 patients, 85% were positive. A negative D-dimer ruled out PE detected at CT. Dyspnea and concurrent symptoms or detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), contraceptive pills and former venous thromboembolism (VTE) were associated with PE. The presence of only one clinical parameter indicated a negative PE diagnosis (p < 0.017), whereas two or more suggested a positive PE diagnosis (p < 0.002). CT also detected various ancillary findings such as consolidation, pleural effusion, nodule or tumor in nearly half of the patients; however, there was no association with the PE diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The quality of CT pulmonary angiography was satisfactory as a first-line imaging of PE. CT also showed additional pathology of importance in the chest. Our study confirmed that a negative D-dimer ruled out clinically suspected VTE.

CT for thromboembolic disease

Pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) constitute the two clinical manifestations of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). The recent innovation of computed tomography venography (CTV) in conjunction with CT pulmonary arteriography (CTPA) provides a single noninvasive diagnostic test that can evaluate both components of VTE. PE is often an underestimated, underdiagnosed, and, consequently, undertreated disease entity. Herein, we review the epidemiology of thromboembolic disease, the diagnostic algorithm used in evaluation of patients with suspected VTE, and protocols for performing CTPA and CTV. Interpretation of these examinations is discussed in detail, because CTPA may pose new challenges to the practicing radiologist.