Diagnostic and interventional radiology in the post-operative period and follow-up of patients after rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis

Correlation between Radiotherapy and Suture Fistulas following Colo-anal Anastomosis for Carcinoma of the Rectum Evaluation of 152 Consecutive Patients

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of suture fistulas and their possible correlation with adjuvant therapy in patients who underwent colo-anal anastomosis and J pouch reconstruction with a protective colostomy. The reliability of the radiological screening and monitoring program was also verified.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients were evaluated radiologically with water-soluble radio-opaque contrast enema before surgery for closure of the protective colostomy. Fifty-seven patients were treated with surgery alone (group A) and 95 patients received adjuvant treatment (group B).

Results

A total of 54 fistulas were seen: 17 in group A (28.9% of patients in group A) and 37 in group B (38.9% of patients in group B). Six fistulas involved the rectovaginal septum. All fistulas were managed medically. The time to resolution was 30 days in 76.4% of patients in group A and about 50 days in 82% of patients in group B. Rectovaginal fistulas always took much longer to heal in both groups and failed to heal in two of the four cases in group B.

Conclusions

Two factors appear to contribute to the high prevalence of fistulas in this series: extension of radiological screening to all operated patients and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, the postoperative course was not compromised by radiotherapy in that these fistulas resolved with medical treatment alone, although healing took longer. The incidence of rectovaginal fistulas was substantially the same in the two groups, but two of the four occurring in group B did not heal. Postoperative monitoring with water-soluble contrast enema appears to be the diagnostic procedure of choice because it is well tolerated, non-invasive and a reliable aid in planning surgical bowel recanalization since no false negative cases were detected clinically after closure of the colostomy.

Is there still a role for double-contrast barium enema examination?

The role of double-contrast barium enema examination (DCBE) in screening for colorectal carcinoma has evolved considerably in recent years. This review will discuss the current indications for DCBE and contrast fluoroscopy of the colon and the anticipated future role of these studies.

Self-Expanding Metal Stents in Gastrointestinal Interventional Radiology: Technical Problems

Aims and background

To analyze the procedural difficulties in the placement of metal stents in stenoses of the digestive tract and optimize the technique.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with digestive tract stenoses were treated from January 1999 to December 2004. In 14 cases the stricture was anastomotic (9 colorectal, 3 esophageal, 1 gastroesophageal and 1 gastrojejunal), in 13 esophageal, in 1 gastric and in 1 duodenal. The stenosis was due to scarring in 5 patients and was malignant in 24 patients (primary in 17 cases and secondary in 7 cases).

Results

The procedure achieved technical success in all cases but 2. For each of the different segments the technical difficulties and the adopted procedural solutions were analyzed.

Conclusions

The interventional radiology approach yielded results comparable to those reported for the endoscopic method and was always well tolerated. The need to rely on materials mostly designed for endoscopic use can make radiological use difficult in some cases.

Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary?

INTRODUCTION

Colonic J-pouch with coloanal anastomosis has gained popularity in the surgical treatment of middle and lower rectal pathologies. If a diverting ileostomy is performed, a pouchogram is frequently performed prior to ileostomy closure. The aim of this study was to assess the routine use of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in patients with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis between 1990 and 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with temporary loop ileostomy who had pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure were included. Pouchogram results were compared to the patient's post ileostomy closure clinical outcome. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of pouchogram were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients had a pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure. Radiological abnormalities were evident in 6 patients, including 4 strictures, 1 pouch-vaginal fistula and 1 leak. Of these findings, 4 were false positives (3 strictures and 1 leak) and two were true positives (1 stricture and 1 pouch-vaginal fistula). The actual rate of pouch complications was 9.5% (8 complications) including 3 anastomotic leaks, all with normal pouchogram, 3 strictures requiring dilatation under anaesthesia, only one detected by pouchogram, and 2 pouch-vaginal fistulas, only one diagnosed by pouchogram. The sensitivity and specificity of pouchogram, respectively, was 0 and 98% for anastomotic leak, 33 and 96% for stricture, and 50 and 100% for pouch-vaginal fistula. Overall, pouchogram changed the management in only 1 of 84 patients.

CONCLUSION

Pouchogram has a low sensitivity in predicting complications following ileostomy closure in patients after colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis and rarely changes the management of these patients. The use of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure may be unnecessary and should be reserved in cases of clinical suspicion of complications.

N/A

N/A