Zusammenhang der Veränderungen psychologischer und subjektiv-beschwerdebezogener Parameter durch Training der Rumpfmuskulatur bei Rückenschmerzpatienten

Stress and Self-Efficacy as Long-Term Predictors for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Purpose

Psychosocial variables are known risk factors for the development and chronification of low back pain (LBP). Psychosocial stress is one of these risk factors. Therefore, this study aims to identify the most important types of stress predicting LBP. Self-efficacy was included as a potential protective factor related to both, stress and pain.

Participants and Methods

This prospective observational study assessed n = 1071 subjects with low back pain over 2 years. Psychosocial stress was evaluated in a broad manner using instruments assessing perceived stress, stress experiences in work and social contexts, vital exhaustion and life-event stress. Further, self-efficacy and pain (characteristic pain intensity and disability) were assessed. Using least absolute shrinkage selection operator regression, important predictors of characteristic pain intensity and pain-related disability at 1-year and 2-years follow-up were analyzed.

Results

The final sample for the statistic procedure consisted of 588 subjects (age: 39.2 (±13.4) years; baseline pain intensity: 27.8 (±18.4); disability: 14.3 (±17.9)). In the 1-year follow-up, the stress types “tendency to worry”, “social isolation”, “work discontent” as well as vital exhaustion and negative life events were identified as risk factors for both pain intensity and pain-related disability. Within the 2-years follow-up, Lasso models identified the stress types “tendency to worry”, “social isolation”, “social conflicts”, and “perceived long-term stress” as potential risk factors for both pain intensity and disability. Furthermore, “self-efficacy” (“internality”, “self-concept”) and “social externality” play a role in reducing pain-related disability.

Conclusion

Stress experiences in social and work-related contexts were identified as important risk factors for LBP 1 or 2 years in the future, even in subjects with low initial pain levels. Self-efficacy turned out to be a protective factor for pain development, especially in the long-term follow-up. Results suggest a differentiation of stress types in addressing psychosocial factors in research, prevention and therapy approaches.

[What influence do increased physical performance, age, sex and training frequency have on the effectiveness of back training?]

BACKGROUND

Active exercising can effectively reduce low back pain but the mechanisms of action are still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

What are the influences of training frequency, increased physical performance, age and gender on the effectiveness of a multimodal back training?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1395 persons with back pain (mean age 46.9 ± 12.3 years, 65% female) took part in a multimodal back training over 24 months in the context of a multicenter study (39 locations). Back pain, physical capacity of strength, mobility and bilateral strength ratio of the spine stabilizing muscles were measured at the beginning of the training and after 6, 12 and 18 months.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The participants trained on average for 41.0 (SD ± 17.8) 60-min training units. This resulted in an increase of strength (28.1%), mobility (14.7%) and strength ratio (6.5%) compared to an age and gender-matched cohort without back pain. Back pain was reduced by 37.5%. The reduction in back pain can be ascribed to the training frequency by 70% and to increased physical performance by 30%. Age only marginally influenced the effect of training, while gender had no significant effect.

CONCLUSION

Increases in physical performance have positive effects on the reduction of back pain but the number of training sessions was shown to be more relevant in the reduction of low back pain.

A psychosomatic intervention in pregnant in-patient women with prenatal somatic risks

PURPOSE

This study examined whether a short-term psychosomatic intervention during pregnancy had effects on characteristics of labour and delivery as well as on the long-term course of anxiety, depression and physical complaints in pregnant in-patient women.

METHODS

All gynaecological and obstetric inpatients of a university hospital, who had either exhibited complications during their pregnancy or were considered high-risk pregnancies, were examined. Symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS) and physical symptoms (GBB) were assessed by standardised questionnaires. Women with elevated scores on either the HADS or the GBB were randomly assigned to either a treatment group, which had received a psychosomatic intervention or an untreated control group. Of the n = 238 women who were assessed during their stay in our hospital, n = 135 were included in the follow-up 1-year later.

RESULTS

More than one-third of the participants (38.7%) had elevated scores of anxiety, depression and/or physical symptoms. The psychosomatic intervention had a significant effect on anxiety scores (p = 0.006), but not on depression scores, physical complaints and characteristics of labour and delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that a short-term psychosomatic intervention can have a positive long-term effect on anxiety symptoms. Future studies are needed to show whether the reduction of anxiety symptoms in turn can lead to a reduction of postnatal complications and lower rates of disturbed mother-child interactions.