Okklusionsstörungen und Auswirkungen auf den funktionellen Bewegungsraum der Lendenwirbelsäule

Systematic changes of the static upper body posture with a symmetric occlusion condition

Background

Temporary occlusal changes and their influence on the upper body statics are still controversially discussed. Furthermore, concrete statements on whether age- or gender-specific differences in neurophysiological reactions exist are missing. Therefore, it is the aim of this study to evaluate the immediate effects of a symmetrical occlusion blocking on the upper body posture. These effects shall be investigated for both genders and for a larger age range.

Methods

In this study, 800 (407f/393 m) subjects volunteered aged from 21 to 60 years. Both genders were divided into four age groups according to decades. The three-dimensional upper body posture was measured by using the rasterstereography (ABW-Bodymapper). The habitual static posture was measured in two dental occlusion conditions (a) in rest position and (b) symmetrical blocking in the bicuspid region by cotton rolls.

Results

A significant reduction of the trunk length (0.72 mm; p <  0.001), an increase of the lumbar (0.30°; p <  0.001) and the thoracic bending angle (0.14°; p = 0.001), a reduction of the spinal forward decline (0.16°; p <  0.001) and a reduction of the scapular distance (0.36 mm; p = 0.001) was found. Gender-specific reactions can only be recorded in scapular distance, in that regard men reduce this distance while over all age groups women did not show a significant change.

Discussion

Slight gender- and age-independent reactions due to a symmetric occlusion blockade are shown: A gender independent reaction of the spinal related variables in the sagittal plane (thoracic and lumbar flexion angle, trunk length, spinal forward decline). In addition, a gender specific change of the shoulder blade distance could be observed, where men reduced the distance while female did not show a change. However, since these reactions are of a minimum amount, it can be concluded that neurophysiological compensation mechanisms work equally well regardless of age and sex, and the upper body posture of healthy people changes only very slightly due to a temporarily symmetrical altered bite position.

Baseline of upper teeth: (a) Control organ for spatial navigation? (b) Weak point for misaligned posture and pain?

Our observations question both the current doctrine of spatial orientation as processed by vestibular, visual and proprioceptive impressions as well as the horizontal alignment of the eye axis. Indeed our observations suggest spatial orientation as a physically based, largely mechanically transmitted interaction between individual and environment. It is controlled by an interface defined by the baseline of upper teeth. It simultaneously constitutes both body and environment acting as an integral part of that environment. Consequently, the baseline of upper teeth is part of the aforementioned environment. Instead of the eye axis during spatial orientation it aligns the true horizontal absolutely. This was tested by fixing a cross to upper teeth. While walking, running and jumping it did not deviate by more than 2° from the external axis. Subsequently, we inclined the baseline of upper teeth by inserting an asymmetric wafer so that it angulated the eye axis. Immediately, head, visual and vestibular axes tilted unstably with misaligned body posture. Only the indicative cross remained stably aligned to the external axes. The person felt "upright", not noticing his posture had changed. He was then instructed to straighten his shoulders and trunk until his posture was objectively nearly upright again. The voluntary correction caused the indicative cross to tilt. The person felt uneven while being more upright. We concluded that the automatic posture works by "synchronizing" the baseline of upper teeth to the external axis and that the synchronized position is supported by the vestibular system. Benefit of an interface is that the body's movements in the environment simultaneously happen within the baseline of upper teeth. Therein the vectors of the body and the environment are calculated to remain in balance. This model introduces the transmission of the vector information to postural muscles by the dura mater, controlled by tension between C0-C2. The information is skewed by bony dislocations between C0-C2 caused by an inclination of the interface. The resulting misalignments of posture are foreseeable and specifically correspond to the type of inclination. They occur in a broad section of the population. Diagnosed as muscular weakness, they may cause therapy resistant common diseases like back and joint pain after 5-10 years. Following our observations, the inclination of the baseline of upper teeth originates from inattentive changes in the length of upper teeth in dental treatment. Multiple treatments optimizing teeth length in long term patients improved the patients' situation.

The effects of a temporarily manipulated dental occlusion on the position of the spine: a comparison during standing and walking

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The relationship between dental occlusion and body posture or even the spine position is often analyzed and confirmed. However, this relationship has not been systematically investigated for standing and walking.

PURPOSE

To examine whether a symmetric or asymmetric dental occlusion block, using 4 mm thick silicon panels, can significantly change the spine position (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar region) during standing and walking.

STUDY DESIGN

The following study is a cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study was carried out with 23 healthy subjects (18 women, 5 men) without discomfort in the temporomandibular system or body movement apparatus.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Position changes (millimeter) of the spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar) in frontal, sagittal, and transverse planes of motion.

METHODS

The upper spine position was quantified with an ultrasonic distance measurement system (sonoSens Monitor). Every subject placed the 4 mm thick silicon panel systematically between the left/right premolars or the front teeth. Differences between the habitual and manipulated occlusion positions were determined by the Friedman test, followed by pairwise comparisons with applied Bonferroni-Holm correction.

RESULTS

During standing and walking there were significant (p≤.05) differences between the occlusion block conditions and the habitual dental position in all body planes except in the right lumbar region during walking. In addition, differences within the manipulated occlusion position could be detected. Significant differences were also shown between the standing and walking trials in the frontal, sagittal, and transverse planes, particularly with respect to the lumbar region (p≤.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Symmetrical and asymmetrical occlusion blocks in the premolar region can be associated with changes in all three spine regions during standing and walking. The results showed highly similar reaction patterns in all spine positions, regardless of the location of the silicon panel. Between standing and walking, the main differences were in the lumbar spine. The results suggest a relationship between the chewing and the movement system. However, it must be stated that this study has no direct clinical impact. The study design cannot determine the causality of the observed associations; also the clinical significance of the small postural changes remains unknown.