Complications of retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: single center experience after 164 cases

Chylous Ascites After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Is Early Surgical Intervention Necessary?

OBJECTIVES

Chylous ascites is a rare complication that may occur after living donor nephrectomy. The continuous loss of lymphatics, which carries a high risk of morbidity, may ensue in possible immunodeficiency and protein-calorie malnutrition. Here, we presented patients who developed chylous ascites after robotassisted living donor nephrectomy and reviewed the current literature of therapeutic strategies for chylous ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 424 laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies performed at a single transplant center; among these, we studied the records of 3 patients who developed chylous ascites following robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Among 438 living donor nephrectomies, 359 (81.9%) were laparoscopic and 77 (18.1%) were by robotic assistance. In the 3 cases highlighted in our study, patient 1 did not respond to conservative therapy, which consisted of diet optimization, total parenteral nutrition, and octreotide (somatostatin). Patient 1 subsequently underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy with suture ligation and clipping of leaking lymphatic vessels, allowing the chylous ascites to subside. Patient 2 similarly did not respond to conservative treatment and developed ascites. Despite initial improvement after wound interrogation and drainage, patient 2 had continued symptoms, resulting in diagnostic laparoscopy and repair of leaky channels leading to the cisterna chyli. Patient 3 developed chylous ascites 4 weeks postoperatively and received ultrasonographic-guided paracentesis by interventional radiology, with results showing an aspirate consistent with chyle. The patient's diet was optimized, allowing for initial improvement and eventual return to normal diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case series and literature review demonstrate the importance of early surgical intervention after failed conservative management for resolution of chylous ascites in patients after robotassisted donor laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Management of Chylous Ascites After Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Living Kidney Donor: A Case Report and Literature Review

Kidney transplant is currently the elective treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) has substantial advantages over open nephrectomy. Chylous ascites (CA) is a rare surgical complication after the LLDN; there are few reports in the literature. We present a case report of a 58-year-old woman who started CA on the 21st day post operation. The recommended initial therapeutic approach to suspend the fat in the diet and place percutaneous drainage was not enough. It was decided to jointly introduce fasting and total parenteral nutrition with the administration of octreotide, resolving the complication completely in 15 days with no need for the patient to undergo surgery. The conservative management, during the first 4 to 8 weeks after the diagnosis is the best option. Surgery is generally recommended if conservative management fails. The prevalence of CA varied between 0% and 6.2% of LLDNs. In our experience of 87 LLDNs, we only presented 1.15% for this complication. There are 62 cases reported in the international literature. The mean presentation was 14 days after LLDN. All patients underwent conservative treatment, and only 15 patients (24%) went to surgery after the failure of conservative management. It would be highly useful, considering the disparity of the prevalence, if the bibliographic reports detail what hemostatic and sealing techniques are used in an LLDN. In this way it would be possible to identify which factor affects a complication like this one.

Chylous Ascites: Complication of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy. Case Report and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Chylous ascites (CA) is an extremely rare complication after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). It can increase the hospital stay, morbidity in postoperative period and thus negating the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. Most of the cases were managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be occasionally required. This report describes the importance of accurate localization of the leaking chyle duct and its repair by endosuturing in a renal donor not responding to conservative treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of literature regarding this rare complication after LDN was performed with Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar using "chyle," "complications," and "laparoscopic donor nephrectomy" as keywords. The demographic profile and management of patients is discussed in detail. The various surgical modalities used to manage these patients are described.

RESULTS

Fifty-four cases of chyle leak/ascites have been reported after LDN in literature to date. Around 77% donors with CA could be successfully managed conservatively with dietary measures and total parenteral nutrition. Surgical intervention was required in nearly 23% donors ranging from clip application, use of argon coagulation, endosuturing with application of glue after 36.1 ± 19.07 days of failed conservative treatment. Donors with massive ascites or requiring frequent large-volume paracentesis on conservative treatment are likely to require surgical therapy. The present case was successfully managed with laparoscopic endosuturing and has no recurrence at 6 month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Chylous ascites is a rare complication after donor nephrectomy in experienced centers. Although conservative management remains the first line of treatment, early surgical treatment shall be undertaken in cases of massive ascites.

Structured introduction of retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy provides a high level of safety and reduces the physical burden for the donor compared to an anterior mini incision: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

A major goal in living donor kidney transplantation is to reduce the physical burden for the donor. Key-hole surgery for donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure, but concerns regarding donor safety during the learning phase might be the reason for surgeons' reluctance to change to a minimal invasive approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the first 100 retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomies (RPDN) performed at our institution and compared the results to the last 50 mini incision donor nephrectomies (MIDN) regarding donor and recipient outcome, and analyzed the learning curves of RPDN.

RESULTS

The learning phase of RPDN was very short with significantly shorter operative times compared to MIDN (118 vs. 175 min, p < 0.001) and significantly fewer surgical complications (p = 0.03). RPDN patients rated the physical burden (p = 0.01) as lower, and they felt less bothered by the surgical scar (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Introducing RPDN is safe, even during the learning phase of the surgeons. Changing surgical technique from MIDN to RPDN reduces the surgical burden of the procedure. Our study might encourage more transplant centres to adopt a minimally invasive approach.

Hand-assisted living-donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of two techniques

BACKGROUND

Living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) is challenging, as surgery is performed on healthy individuals. Minimally invasive techniques for LDN have become standard in most centers. Nevertheless, numerous techniques have been described with no consensus on which is the superior approach. Both hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic (HARS) and hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) LDNs are performed at Zurich University Hospital. The aim of this study was to compare these two surgical techniques in terms of donor outcome and graft function.

METHOD

Retrospective single-center analysis of 60 consecutive LDNs (HARS n = 30; HALS n = 30) from June 2010 to May 2012, including a one-year follow-up of the recipients.

RESULTS

There was no mortality in either group and little difference in the overall complication rates. Median warm ischemia time (WIT) was significantly shorter in the HARS group. The use of laxatives and the incidence of postoperative vomiting were significantly greater in the HALS group. There was no difference between right- and left-sided nephrectomies in terms of donor outcome and graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques appear safe for both donors and donated organs. The HARS technique is associated with a shorter WIT and a reduced incidence of postoperative paralytic ileus. Therefore, we consider HARS LDN a valuable alternative to HALS LDN.

Perioperative Events and Complications in Minimally Invasive Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy has become a fully implemented and accepted procedure. Donors have to be well educated about all risks and details during the informed consent process. For this to be successful, more information regarding short-term outcome is necessary.

METHODS

A literature search was performed; all studies discussing short-term complications after minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy were included. Outcomes evaluated were intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversions, operative and warm ischemia times, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain score, convalescence, quality of life, and costs.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety articles were included in the systematic review, 41 in the meta-analysis. Conversion rate was 1.1%. Intraoperative complication rate was 2.3%, mainly bleeding (1.5%). Postoperative complications occurred in 7.3% of donors, including infectious complications (2.6%), of which mainly wound infection (1.6%) and bleeding (1.0%). Reported mortality rate was 0.01%. All minimally invasive techniques were comparable with regard to complication or conversion rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The used techniques for minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy are safe and associated with low complication rates and minimal risk of mortality. These data may be helpful to develop a standardized, donor-tailored informed consent procedure for live donor nephrectomy.

Management Protocol for Chylous Ascites After Laparoscopic Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To devise a management protocol for chylous ascites after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of the patients that underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between January 2010 and January 2014 in our institution for different indications and were diagnosed with chylous ascites. We also analyzed a different management protocol that was used.

RESULTS

The overall incident rate of chylous ascites was 0.77%. It was more commonly seen on left side and with simple nephrectomy rather than radical. Three out of 9 patients were managed by surgical intervention, rest were successfully managed on conservative treatment in the form of dietary modification, total parenteral nutrition, or octreotide.

CONCLUSION

Chylous ascites is a rare but morbid condition following laparoscopic nephrectomy. To manage this complication, we propose preventive and treatment strategies based on symptoms and amount of chylous ascites using our experience and review of the literature.

Chylous ascites after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy: Is it specific for the left-side?

We describe a case-report of a chylous ascites after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, summarize the current literature, and hypothesize on the etiology of this complication.

Technical modifications of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Chinese experience

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to report a single-center experience and technical modifications of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-one 3-port RPLDNs were performed at our institution. No prisoners or organs from prisoners were used to collect the data for this study. The tributaries of renal artery and vein were transected using a harmonic scalpel after both ends of the tributary were coagulated intermittently until the color turned light yellow. Transection was made using shifting coagulation. A longitudinal 6-8-cm skin incision was extended inferiorly from the primary trocar with muscles intact. The renal artery was clipped using two Hem-o-Lok clips at the proximal end, and then sheared by scissors without any clips on the kidney side. The renal vein was controlled similarly. The graft was retrieved by insertion of a hand through the longitudinal lumbar incision.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and warm ischemia time were 126.1 and 3.6 minutes, respectively. No blood transfusion or open conversion was required. None of the donors encountered a major complication, but 7 suffered minor complications. Preoperative and postoperative mean serum creatinine levels of the donors were 1.00 and 1.29 mg/dL, respectively. The mean serum creatinine levels of the recipients postoperatively at day 1 and month 1 were 5.48 and 1.60 mg/dL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified approach of RPLDN may be a useful alternative with flexible control of the renal vessels and tributaries and easy retrieval of the graft.

Efficacy of early use of snake retractor in retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A snake retractor is generally used to create a better surgical field and space, but when to start using it is still controversial. In this study, we used a snake retractor starting in an early stage of the procedure to safely perform surgery and compared the results with a control group in which the procedure depended on operator discretion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients were enrolled in this study and compared with a control group (n = 12) in which no special technique was used. We used four ports in both right- and left sided cases and used a snake retractor when removing the flank pad to create a better surgical space and field. We compared two groups in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Three surgeons were enrolled. In the intervention group (early use of snake retractor), operative time was 107 to 300 minutes (median 162 min), and intraoperative blood loss was 0 to 462 g (69.5 g). In the control group, operative time was 185 to 485 minutes (258 min) and intraoperative blood loss was 0 to 302 g (40 g). Operative time was significantly shorter in the intervention group than the control group (P = 0.0034). There was no significant correlation with intraoperative blood loss volume and BMI in these two groups. We did not have any patients with metastasis or recurrence of cancer in either group in post-operative follow-up. Only the control group included a case with a slight duodenum injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Early use of the snake retractor in retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy may produce a significantly safer operative procedure.

Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: initial experience with a unique hand-assisted approach

The retroperitoneoscopic (RP) approach to live donor nephrectomy (LDN) may be advantageous for the donor because it avoids mobilization of peritoneal organs and provides direct access to the renal vessels. Notwithstanding, this approach is not popular, likely because of the steeper learning curve. We feel that hand-assistance (HA) can reduce the learning curve and in this study, we present our experience with a novel hand-assist approach to retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (HARP-LDN). Over a one-yr period, 10 consecutive patients underwent left HARP-LDN with a mean body mass index of 29 and three with prior left abdomen surgery. The surgical technique utilizes a 7 cm, muscle-sparing incision for the hand-port with two endoscopic ports. Operative time was an average of 155 min., with no open conversions. Mean blood loss was 68 mL, and warm ischemia time was 2.5 min. Hospital stay averaged 2.7 d with postoperative complications limited to one urinary retention. Our modified HARP approach to left LDN is safe, effective and can be performed expeditiously. Our promising initial results require a larger patient cohort to confirm the advantages of the hand-assisted retroperitoneal technique.

Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a single institute experience of 1017 procedures

PURPOSE

We evaluated complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1991 to January 2009, 1017 urologic laparoscopic surgical procedures were performed in Kansai Medical University, including 277 radical prostatectomies, 13 donor nephrectomies, 74 partial nephrectomies, 158 radical nephrectomies, 55 pyeloplasties, 97 nephrouretectomies, 54 simple nephrectomies, 128 adrenalectomies, 34 varicocelectomies, and 127 other procedures. Medical records of each procedure were retrospectively evaluated. The difficulty of each procedure was classified according to the European Scoring System (ESS). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to the Satava and Clavien classifications, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 1017 laparoscopic procedures, 148 complications occurred in 123 patients, resulting in a total complication rate of 14.6%. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 20 (1.9%) patients. Nephrouretectomy had the highest incidence of complications at 23.7%, which was significantly higher than that of other procedures classified as "difficult" group, according to the ESS (P < 0.05). Clavien grades I and II accounted for 73.8% of all the postoperative complications. We experienced one fatality that was caused by air embolism.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated the complications of each procedure using the ESS for classification of technical difficulty. Based on the results of our retrospective study, nephrouretectomy should be upgraded as "very difficult" group according to the ESS. Appropriate grading by technical difficulty is beneficial for the prevention of complications from laparoscopic surgery.

Chylous ascites requiring surgical intervention after donor nephrectomy: case series and single center experience

Chylous ascites as a result of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a rare complication that carries significant morbidity, including severe protein-calorie malnutrition and an associated immunocompromised state. We report a patient who underwent hand-assisted left LDN and subsequently developed chylous ascites. He failed conservative therapy including low-fat diet with medium-chain triglycerides (LFD/MCT) and oral protein supplementation as well as strict NPO status with intravenous (IV) total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and subcutaneous (SQ) somatostatin analogue administration. Laparoscopic re-exploration and intracorporeal suture ligation and clipping of leaking lymph channels successfully sealed the chyle leak. We review the literature to date including diagnosis, incidence, management options, psychosocial aspects and clinical outcomes of chylous ascites after LDN.

Chylous ascites requiring surgical intervention after donor nephrectomy: case series and single center experience

Chylous ascites as a result of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a rare complication that carries significant morbidity, including severe protein-calorie malnutrition and an associated immunocompromised state. We report a patient who underwent hand-assisted left LDN and subsequently developed chylous ascites. He failed conservative therapy including low-fat diet with medium-chain triglycerides (LFD/MCT) and oral protein supplementation as well as strict NPO status with intravenous (IV) total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and subcutaneous (SQ) somatostatin analogue administration. Laparoscopic re-exploration and intracorporeal suture ligation and clipping of leaking lymph channels successfully sealed the chyle leak. We review the literature to date including diagnosis, incidence, management options, psychosocial aspects and clinical outcomes of chylous ascites after LDN.