Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and results in 105 patients

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of pyeloplasty in management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and safety of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction by a meta-analysis. We searched the databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase database from their inception to December 1st, 2020. Relevant literatures comparing retroperitoneal pyeloplasty with transperitoneal pyeloplasty were identified. A meta-analysis was conducted with Revman 5.3. The main outcomes included success rate, operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate of open surgery, overall complications, and detailed postoperative complications/indicators. 15 studies with 1881 patients were included. The results revealed that there were no significant differences between two approaches in success rate [OR = 1.51, 95%CI (0.94, 2.41), p = 0.09], hospital stay [MD = 0.21, 95%CI (-0.12, 0.54), p = 0.21] and overall complications [OR = 1.07, 95%CI (0.76, 1.50), p = 0.69]. The retroperitoneal approach was associated with longer operative time [MD = -26.91, 95%CI (-40.97, -12.84), p < 0.001], higher conversion rate [OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.11, 0.47), p < 0.001] than the transperitoneal approach. As for the detailed postoperative complications/indicators, there were no significant differences between two approaches in the urinary leak, mild hematuria, fever, UPJO recurrence, infection and subcutaneous emphysema, as well as split renal function, renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter. The funnel plots showed that there were no obvious publication biases in our analysis. Therefore, we concluded that transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches had similar benefits and safety in success rate, hospital stay, overall complications and detailed postoperative complications/indicators. However, retroperitoneal was associated with longer operative time and higher conversion rate than transperitoneal approach. With the limitations of our study, additional high-quality studies are still essential for further evaluation.

Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Background and Objectives:

To compare laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a prospective randomized manner and assess overall results with long-term follow-up.

Methods:

In this prospective study, from 2008 to 2012, 112 cases of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into 2 groups. Group I included patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and group II consisted of patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative and operative data were collected and analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test, χ² test, and Mann-Whitney U test for independent groups, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The total operative time and intracorporeal suturing time were significantly higher in group II than in group I (P < .001). The visual analog scale score for pain on postoperative day 1 and the requirement for tramadol were significantly higher in group I than in group II (P = .004). The hospital stay and the rate of temporary ileus were significantly greater (P < .036 and P < .02, respectively) in group I than in group II. The success rate of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic pyeloplasty was 96.4% versus 96.6% with a mean follow-up period of 30.75 ± 4.85 months versus 30.99 ± 5.59 months (P < .88).

Conclusion:

Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty is associated with significantly greater postoperative pain, a higher tramadol dose, a higher rate of ileus, and a longer hospital stay in comparison with retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Although the operative time for retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic pyeloplasty is significantly longer, the success rate remains the same for both procedures.

An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Introduction

Over the last two decades, minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction have been developed and are bcoming more popular. Multiple series of laparoscopic pyeloplasty have demonstrated high success rates and low perioperative morbidity in pediatric and adult populations, for both the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. In this review, we aimed to analyze the current status of minimally invasive therapy of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Material and methods

A PubMed database search was conducted to examine minimally invasive treatments of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Results

A large number of cases have been reported for adult patients, confirming that robotic pyeloplasty represents a viable option for either primary or secondary repair. Comparative studies demonstrate similar success and complication rates between minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty in both the adult and pediatric populations. A clear advantage, in terms of hospital stay, of minimally invasive over open pyeloplasty was observed only in the adult population.

Conclusions

Studies have shown that minimally invasive pyeloplasty techniques are a safe, effective, and feasible in adult and pediatric populations.

A modified suture technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty of pelviureteric junction obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To describe a modified suture technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (TPLDP) that can be consistently replicated.

METHODS

Between June 2010 and April 2014, 21 men and 7 women with primary pelviureteric junction obstruction underwent our modified TPLDP suture technique performed by the same surgeon. In our method, the dismembering should be performed after performing half of anastomosis to achieve the maintenance of correct orientation and the prevention of torsion of anastomosis. We defined the success criteria as complete clinical resolution of flank pain for the patients with flank pain and complete radiologic resolution for the asymptomatic patients.

RESULTS

The mean overall operative time for our technique was 137.3 minutes. The mean operative time for procedures on the left side was longer than on the right side (P = .02). The mean suture time was 37.2 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 29.4 mL, and the crossing vessel was found in 7 of 28 patients (25.0%). No open conversion was required. The mean follow-up time was 21.0 months. Only 1 patient still had frequent and intolerable flank pain after surgery whose treatment was unsuccessful. The rest of the patients got complete clinical or radiologic resolution. The success rate was 27 of 28 (96.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our modified TPLDP suture technique is feasible and seems to be safe and to allow high success rate for the treatment of pelviureteric junction obstruction. Sizable sample and further analysis about technique will be completed in the future.

Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Over the last two decades, minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) have been developed and popularized.

OBJECTIVE

To critically analyze the current status of laparoscopic and robotic repair of UPJO.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review was performed in November 2012 using PubMed. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Multiple series of laparoscopic pyeloplasty have demonstrated high success rates and low perioperative morbidity in pediatric and adult populations, with both the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. Data on pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty are increasingly becoming available. A larger number of cases have also been reported for adult patients, confirming that robotic pyeloplasty represents a viable option for either primary or secondary repair. Robot-assisted redo pyeloplasty has been mostly described in the pediatric population. Different technical variations have been implemented with the aim of tailoring the procedure to each specific case. The type of stenting, retrograde versus antegrade, continues to be debated. Internal-external stenting as well as a stentless approach have been used, especially in the pediatric population. Comparative studies demonstrate similar success and complication rates between minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty in both the adult and pediatric setting. A clear advantage in terms of hospital stay for minimally invasive over open pyeloplasty was observed only in the adult population.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy represents an efficient and effective less invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty. Robotic pyeloplasty is likely to emerge as the new minimally invasive standard of care whenever robotic technology is available because its precise suturing and shorter learning curve represent unique attractive features. For both laparoscopy and robotics, the technique can be tailored to the specific case according to intraoperative findings and personal surgical experience.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

To report a 6-year multi-institutional experience and outcomes with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) for the repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2002 and October 2008, 168 adult patients from 3 institutions underwent RLP for UPJO. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data were performed after institutional review board approval. Diagnosis was by intravenous urogram or computed tomography scan and diuretic renogram. All patients underwent RLP through a 4-port laparoscopic technique. Demographic, preoperative, operative, and postoperative endpoints for primary and secondary repair of UPJO were measured. Success was defined as a T½ of <20 minutes on diuretic renogram and symptom resolution. Pain resolution was assessed by subjective patient reports.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients, 147 (87.5%) had primary repairs and 21 (12.5%) had secondary repairs. Of the secondary repairs, 57% had a crossing vessel etiology. Mean operative time was 134.9 minutes, estimated blood loss was 49 mL, and length of stay was 1.5 days. Mean follow-up was 39 months. Overall, 97.6% of patients had a successful outcome, with a 6.6% overall complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this review represents the largest multi-institutional experience of RLP with intermediate-term follow-up. RLP is a safe, efficacious, and viable option for either primary or secondary repair of UPJO with reproducible outcomes, a high success rate, and a low incidence of complications.