1
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng S, Liu L, Wang Y, Zhou C, Zhang H. Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies. Surg Innov 2024:15533506241273378. [PMID: 39101895 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241273378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) vs open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LNU and ONU in UTUC patients. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until July 12, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess the quality of eligible studies. Measurements of surgical and oncological outcomes were extracted and pooled including mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Five high-quality retrospective studies were included, totaling 6422 patients; 2080 (32.4%) underwent LNU, and 4342 (67.6%) underwent ONU. With respect to surgical outcomes, patients in the LNU group experienced less estimated blood loss and had shorter hospital stay than those in the ONU group, but there was no significant difference in complication rates and operation time. In regard to oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LNU and ONU groups in 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, 3-year intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) was worse in the LNU group compared to the ONU group. CONCLUSION LNU was associated with less estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stays than ONU, but there were no differences in OS and CSS between the surgical modalities. Nonetheless, LNU might result in poorer IVRFS than ONU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shidong Deng
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Lingzhi Liu
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Yurou Wang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Chuan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Huihui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- Institute of Hospital Administration, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferro M, Chiujdea S, Vartolomei MD, Bove P, Porreca A, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Antonelli A, Foschi N, Racioppi M, Autorino R, Chiancone F, Longo N, Barone B, Crocetto F, Musi G, Luzzago S, Piccinelli ML, Mistretta FA, de Cobelli O, Tataru OS, Hurle R, Liguori G, Borghesi M, Veccia A, Greco F, Schips L, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Dutto D, Colucci F, Russo GI, Giudice AL, Montanari E, Boeri L, Simone G, Rosazza M, Livoti S, Gontero P, Soria F. Advanced Age Impacts Survival After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:27-37. [PMID: 37661507 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is rare but has a poor prognosis. Prognostic factors have been extensively studied in order to provide the best possible management for patients. We have aimed to investigate commonly available factors predictive of recurrence and survival in this patient population at high risk of death and recurrence, with an emphasis on the effects of age (using a cutoff of 70 years) on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1387 patients with clinically nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy at 21 academic hospital centers between 2005 and 2021, 776 patients were eligible and included in the study. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were built to evaluate the independent prognosticators for intravesical and extravesical recurrence, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival according to age groups. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS We did not find an association between groups aged <70 and >70 years old and preoperatively clinical or histopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was found no statistical significance between the 2 age groups in terms of intravesical or extravesical recurrence (P = .09 and P = .57). Overall survival (P = .0001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .0001) have been found to be statistically significantly associated with age as independent predictors (confounding factors: gender, tumor size, tumor side, clinical T stage, localization, preoperative hydronephrosis, tumor localization, type of surgery, multifocality of the tumor, pathological grade, lymphovascular invasion, concomitant CIS, lymph node status, necrosis, or history of previous bladder cancer). CONCLUSION This research confirms that patients aged 70 and above who undergo radical nephroureterectomy may have worse outcomes compared to younger patients, older patients needing an improved care and management of UTUC to improve their outcomes in the setting of an increase in this aged population group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria; The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy; Department of Experimental Medicine, Tor vergata Oncoscience Research Centre of Excellence, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Racioppi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Longo
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania; Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical Integrated Sciences (DISC), Urology Section, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ivan Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Arturo Lo Giudice
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Livoti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen CY, Chang CH, Yang CR, Hsieh KL, Tsing WH, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Huang CY, Hong JH, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Tsai YC, Wu SY, Shen CH, Cheong IS, Chen CS, Yang CK, Jiang YH, Tsai CY, Hsueh TY, Chen YT, Wu CC, Lo SH, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Lin PH, Tai TY, Li WM, Lee HY. Prognostic factors of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:22. [PMID: 38197890 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04700-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate predictive factors of increasing intravesical recurrence (IVR) rate in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) with bladder cuff excision (BCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 2114 patients were included from the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group. It was divided into two groups: IVR-free and IVR after RNUx, with 1527 and 587 patients, respectively. To determine the factors affecting IVR, TNM stage, the usage of pre-operative ureteroscopy, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate the rates of prognostic outcomes in overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), and the survival curves were compared using the stratified log-rank test. RESULTS Based on our research, ureter tumor, female, smoking history, age (< 70 years old), multifocal tumor, history of bladder cancer were determined to increase the risk of IVR after univariate analysis. The multivariable analysis revealed that female (BRFS for male: HR 0.566, 95% CI 0.469-0.681, p < 0.001), ureter tumor (BRFS: HR 1.359, 95% CI 1.133-1.631, p = 0.001), multifocal (BRFS: HR 1.200, 95% CI 1.001-1.439, p = 0.049), history of bladder cancer (BRFS: HR 1.480, 95% CI 1.118-1.959, p = 0.006) were the prognostic factors for IVR. Patients who ever received ureterorenoscopy (URS) did not increase the risk of IVR. CONCLUSION Patients with ureter tumor and previous bladder UC history are important factors to increase the risk of IVR after RNUx. Pre-operative URS manipulation is not associated with higher risk of IVR and diagnostic URS is feasible especially for insufficient information of image study. More frequent surveillance regimen may be needed for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ya Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Rei Yang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Lin Hsieh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsin Tsing
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Science, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Wu
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Huang Shen
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsiu Lo
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Yao Tai
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu H, Lai S, Wang M, Tang X, Lai CH, Xu K, Xu T, Hu H. Effect of subsequent bladder cancer on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients post-radical nephroureterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2023; 23:212. [PMID: 38129811 PMCID: PMC10734187 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01387-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the primary treatment strategy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the intravesical recurrence occurs in 20-50% of all patients. The specific effect of subsequent bladder cancer (SBCa) on survival remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effect of SBCa following RNU in patients with UTUC. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were exhaustively searched for studies comparing oncological outcomes between SBCa and without SBCa. Standard cumulative analyses using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). RESULTS Five studies involving 2057 patients were selected according to the predefined eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) revealed no significant differences between the SBCa and non-SBCa groups. However, subgroup analysis of pT0-3N0M0 patients suggested that people with SBCa had worse CSS (HR = 5.13, 95%CI 2.39-10.98, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 4.00, 95%CI 2.19-7.31, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS SBCa appears to be associated with worse OS in patients with early stage UTUC. However, caution must be taken before recommendations are made because this interpretation is based on very few clinical studies and a small sample size. Research sharing more detailed surgical site descriptions, as well as enhanced outcome data collection and improved reporting, is required to further investigate these nuances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haopu Hu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shicong Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mingrui Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xinwei Tang
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chin-Hui Lai
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kexin Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Hu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Somiya S, Kobori G, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Koterazawa S, Takaoka N, Haitani T, Nagahama K, Ito M, Megumi Y, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H, Kanno T. Preoperative risk classification for intravesical recurrence after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in a multi-institutional cohort. Int J Urol 2023; 30:853-858. [PMID: 37278493 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to identify preoperative risk factors and create a risk classification for intravesical recurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma only after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 283 patients who had undergone laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial cancer between March 2002 and March 2020. The cumulative incidence of intravesical recurrence for 224 patients without previous or concomitant bladder cancer was examined using multivariate Fine-Gray competing risks proportional hazards models. A risk stratification model was created to predict subsequent patient outcomes based on the results. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 33.3 months, and 71 (31.7%) patients experienced intravesical recurrence. The estimated cumulative incidence of intravesical recurrence at one and 5 years was 23.5% and 36.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ureter tumors and multiple tumors were shown to be independently significant predictive factors for intravesical recurrence. Based on the results, we classified patients into three risk groups. The cumulative incidence rates of intravesical recurrence within 5 years after surgery were 24.4%, 42.5%, and 66.7% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We identified risk factors and created a risk classification model for intravesical recurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma only after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Based on this model, an individualized surveillance protocol or adjuvant therapy could be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Nagahama
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Megumi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhao H, Liu K, Giannakopoulos S, Yuruk E, De Naeyer G, Álvarez-Maestro M, Ng CF, Laguna P, De La Rosette J, Yuen-Chun Teoh J. Impact of previous malignancy at diagnosis on oncological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Urol 2023; 23:49. [PMID: 36991375 PMCID: PMC10061966 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01206-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence of prognostic factors and individualized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma are still weak. OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether the history of previous malignancy (HPM) affects the oncological outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS The CROES-UTUC registry is an international, observational, multicenter cohort study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to their HPM. RESULTS A total of 996 patients were included in this study. With a median recurrence-free survival time of 7.2 months and a median follow-up time of 9.2 months, 19.5% of patients had disease recurrence. The recurrence-free survival rate in the HPM group was 75.7%, which was significantly lower than non-HPM group (82.7%, P = 0.012). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that HPM could increase the risk of upper tract recurrence (P = 0.048). Furthermore, patients with a history of non-urothelial cancers had a higher risk of intravesical recurrence (P = 0.003), and patients with a history of urothelial cancers had a higher risk of upper tract recurrence (P = 0.015). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, the history of non-urothelial cancer was a risk factor for intravesical recurrence (P = 0.004), and the history of urothelial cancer was a risk factor for upper tract recurrence (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION Both previous non-urothelial and urothelial malignancy could increase the risk of tumor recurrence. But different cancer types may increase different sites' risk of tumor recurrence for patients with UTUC. According to present study, more personalized follow-up plans and active treatment strategies should be considered for UTUC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongda Zhao
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kang Liu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Emrah Yuruk
- Department of Urology, The Ministry of Health, University of Health Sciences, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
| | | | - Chi-Fai Ng
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jean De La Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051409. [PMID: 36900201 PMCID: PMC10000228 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990-2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien-Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. RESULTS Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22-2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22-2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta -1.1, 95% CI -2.2-0.02, p = 0.047 and beta -6.1, 95% CI -7.2-5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31-0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Shimura S, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Moroo S, Koguchi D, Taoka Y, Hirayama T, Murakami Y, Utsunomiya T, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Irie A, Iwamura M. A multi-institutional retrospective study of open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy focused on the intravesical recurrence. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:71-78. [PMID: 35404494 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively frequent, occurring in about 30-50% of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of the prognosis and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery and to elucidate the risk factor of IVR. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 403 patients with UTUC treated with laparoscopic or open nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals between 1990 and 2015. The clinicopathological factors of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots, and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There was no difference in recurrence and cancer-specific mortality between open and laparoscopic surgery in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in IVR rate between the laparoscopic and open groups (p = .22). Among the patients with IVR, 84% of patients relapsed within 2 years. Univariate analysis of IVR showed a significant increase in patients with low-grade (p = .03, HR = 1.64) or low-stage urothelial carcinoma (pT1 or lower, p = .006, HR = 1.77) with no lymph node involvement (p = .002, HR = 10.3) or lymphovascular invasion (p = .009, HR = 1.79). Surgical modality was not an independent factor. In multivariate analysis, there was no independent predictive factor for IVR. CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and IVR between open and laparoscopic surgery. On the other hand, our results suggested that the low malignant potential tumor may be a risk factor for IVR. This finding provides insight into IVR, which may help with the development of personalized prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Shimura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shigenori Moroo
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, Higashiyamato, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lai S, Wu P, Liu S, Seery S, Liu J, He L, Liu M, Zhang Y, Wang JY, Xu T. Presence of secondary bladder cancer following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: characteristics, risk factors, and predictive value. BMC Urol 2022; 22:211. [PMID: 36566200 PMCID: PMC9789644 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01158-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the characteristics, predictive risk factors, and prognostic effect of secondary bladder cancer (SBCa) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, the authors analyzed clinicopathologic characteristics and survival data from 472 UTUC patients with SBCa after RNU, between 2004 and 2017. Cox's proportional hazard regression model was implemented to identify independent predictors associated with post-recurrence outcomes. The threshold for statistical significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS In total, 200 Ta-3N0M0 localized UTUC patients with complete data were finally included. With a median follow-up of 71.0 months (interquartile ranges [IQR] 36.0 -103.8 months), 52.5% (n = 105) had died, with 30.5% (n = 61) dying of UTUC. The median time interval from UTUC to SBCa was 13.5 months (IQR 6.0-40.8 months). According to multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients with SBCa located at multiple sites, advanced SBCa stage, higher SBCa grade, elderly age and a shorter recurrence time, encountered worse cancer-specific survival (CSS), all p < 0.05. CONCLUSION For primary UTUC patients with SBCa after radical surgery, advanced age, multiple SBCa sites, shorter recurrence time, higher SBCa stage, and grade proved to be significant independent prognostic factors of CSS. We ought to pay more attention to SBCa prevention as well as to earlier signs which may increase the likelihood of early detection. Having the ability to manage what may be seen as the superficial SBCa signs may enable us to improve survival but further research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shicong Lai
- grid.411634.50000 0004 0632 4559Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Pengjie Wu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Shengjie Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Samuel Seery
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.9835.70000 0000 8190 6402Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW UK
| | - Jianyong Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Lei He
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Ming Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Yaoguang Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Jian-ye Wang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 DaHua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730 China
| | - Tao Xu
- grid.411634.50000 0004 0632 4559Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044 China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu Z, Li M, Wang L, Paul A, Raman JD, Necchi A, Psutka SP, Buonerba C, Zargar H, Black PC, Derweesh IH, Mir MC, Uzzo RG, Pandolfo SD, Autorino R, DI Lorenzo G. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for urothelial cancer: a multidisciplinary systematic review and critical analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:518-527. [PMID: 35383431 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04659-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is not yet supported by randomized controlled trials in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but the evidence is increasing. This narrative systematic review was conducted to evaluate the available evidence on the role of NAST in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all relevant articles or conference abstracts published and indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on July 19, 2021. The study was reported according to the PRISMA criteria and designed within the PICOS framework. We included studies comparing patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) with patients who underwent definitive surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant systemic therapy. Prospective uncontrolled studies were also included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 27 reports (NAC, N.=24 and NAI, N.=3) published between 2010 and 2021. Twenty of the 24 studies on NAC were retrospective comparative analyses, whereas the remaining four were prospective single-arm studies. One of the three NAI studies exclusively enrolled patients with UTUC. NAC was associated with improved survival and better pathological response relative to surgery alone, but there was no clear advantage when compared to surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, the drug-induced toxicity and risk of disease progression were acceptable but the inherent bias across study designs, inadequate reporting and heterogeneous definition of primary outcomes render it difficult to synthesize results, compare centers, and inform practice. CONCLUSIONS The current level of evidence supporting NAST for UTUC is relatively low and the inability to predict responsiveness and thereby pinpoint the optimal candidates remains a major challenge. There is a need to compare NAST to adjuvant therapies using clearly defined primary endpoints as minimum reporting standards developed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingmin Li
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China -
| | - Asit Paul
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Regional Reference Center for Rare Tumors, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Unit of Surgery, Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urological Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Giuseppe DI Lorenzo
- Unit Oncology, Andrea Tortora Hospital, ASL Salerno, Pagani, Salerno, Italy.,Vincenzo Tiberio Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Song Y, Han J, Qin C, Du Y, Xu T. Whether diagnostic ureteroscopic biopsy and ureteroscopy without biopsy have different impacts on intravesical recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy? World J Urol 2022; 40:2135-2137. [PMID: 35633403 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04064-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxuan Song
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Jingli Han
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Caipeng Qin
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Yiqing Du
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comment on "Durability of response to primary chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma using UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel: OLYMPUS trial final report". World J Urol 2022; 40:1251-1252. [PMID: 35191990 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03968-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
14
|
Zeng S, Ying Y, Yu X, Wang L, Zhang Z, Xu C. Impact of previous, simultaneous or intravesical recurrence bladder cancer on prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy: a large population-based study. Transl Androl Urol 2022; 10:4365-4375. [PMID: 35070818 PMCID: PMC8749064 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, the impact of previous, simultaneous, or subsequent bladder cancer on the prognosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the impact of previous, simultaneous or intravesical recurrence (IVR) bladder cancer on the prognosis of UTUC based on a large population-based cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods A total of 8,431 UTUC patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2018 met the inclusion criteria were identified based on the SEER database. We evaluated the impact of bladder cancer on the prognosis of UTUC by Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM). Results In all, 6,831 patients only had UTUC (UTUC-only), 880 patients with previous or simultaneous bladder cancer (UTUC-Bca), 720 patients with IVR (UTUC-IVR). After adjusting baseline covariates that varied significantly among groups, we found UTUC-Bca cohort, regardless of tumor grade and stage, had poorer prognosis than UTUC-only cohort. In general, we demonstrated IVR had no significant impact on the prognosis of UTUC compared to PSM matched patients without IVR. However, subgroup analysis revealed that UTUC patients with subsequent MIBC recurrence or shorter interval (<20 months) between UTUC and IVR had worse prognosis compared with UTUC-only cohort. Conclusions UTUC patients with previous or simultaneous bladder cancer, IVR with MIBC, and shorter interval between UTUC and IVR were significant predictor for worse prognosis. Thus, more stringent postoperative surveillance and active treatment strategies should be considered for UTUC patients with those risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxiong Zeng
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yidie Ying
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaowen Yu
- Department of Geriatrics, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhensheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yanagi M, Hamasaki T, Akatsuka J, Endo Y, Takeda H, Kondo Y. Risk factor analysis of intravesical recurrence after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Urol 2021; 21:167. [PMID: 34856960 PMCID: PMC8638342 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00932-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the major concerns of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy is intravesical recurrence (IVR). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the predictive risk factors for IVR after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC. Methods Clinicopathological and surgical information were collected from the medical records of 73 patients treated with RNU for non-metastatic UTUC, without a history of or concomitant bladder cancer. The association between IVR after RNU and clinicopathological and surgery-related factors, including preoperative urine cytology and pneumoretroperitoneum time, was analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Results During the median follow-up time of 39.1 months, 18 (24.7%) patients had subsequent IVR after RNU. The 1- and 3-year IVR-free survival rates were 85.9% and 76.5%, respectively. The Fisher exact test revealed that prolonged pneumoretroperitoneum time of ≥ 210 min was a risk factor for IVR in 1 year after RNU (p = 0.0358) and positive urine cytology was a risk factor for IVR in 3 years after RNU (p = 0.0352). Conclusions In UTUC, the occurrences of IVR in 1 and 3 years after RNU are highly probable when the pneumoretroperitoneum time is prolonged (≥ 210 min) and in patients with positive urine cytology, respectively. Strict follow-up after RNU is more probable recommended for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Yanagi
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Tsutomu Hamasaki
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-396, Kosugityo, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Jun Akatsuka
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yuki Endo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hayato Takeda
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Kondo
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Is bladder preservation safe? The oncology outcomes of patients after 2-sided radical nephroureterectomies due to bilateral upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 54:63-69. [PMID: 34783981 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-03005-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognosis of patients undergoing 2-sided radical nephroureterectomies (RNUs) with a residual bladder due to bilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is poorly understood. This study was aimed toward surveying the oncology outcomes and prognostic factors that may help in shared decision-making related to bladder preservation in patients preparing to receive 2-sided RNUs. METHODS Patients with synchronous or metachronous bilateral UTUC who received bilateral RNUs with a residual bladder in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and pathological data were analyzed for potential variables affecting the oncology outcomes. RESULTS A total of 50 patients were included. The average age at completion of the 2-sided RNU was 62.7 ± 12.4 years, with a mean follow-up of 88.4 ± 59.3 months after the 2-sided RNUs. The medium overall survival was 13.4 ± 1.8 years. Twenty-six patients (52%) had cancer recurrence in the residual bladder, but only 2 (8%) of the recurrences were muscle invasive. The highest UTUC stage was the only predictive factor for cancer-specific survival (CSS) rather than intravesical recurrence. The 5 year CSS rates in patients with the highest UTUC stage ≦ pT2 and ≧ pT3 were 90% and 51%, respectively (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Risk of cancer recurrence in the residual bladder is high, but does not affect survival outcomes. The highest UTUC stage plays a significant role in cancer-specific survival. With a careful patient surveillance, bladder preservation may be reasonable in patients with bilateral UTUC preparing for 2-sided RNUs.
Collapse
|
17
|
Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Sung HH. Conditional Intravesical Recurrence-Free Survival Rate After Radical Nephroureterectomy With Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:730114. [PMID: 34692504 PMCID: PMC8529179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.730114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the conditional intravesical recurrence (IVR)–free (IVRF) survival rate in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who had no history of bladder cancer and no concomitant bladder cancer. Hence, we aimed to analyze a relatively large number of patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (RNUx). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1,095 patients with UTUC who underwent RNUx. Their baseline characteristics, bladder tumor history, and UTUC features were analyzed to evaluate oncological outcomes. To determine the factors affecting IVR, surgical modality, use of preoperative ureteroscopy, TNM stage, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors affecting IVR. Conditional IVRF survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results Among the 1,095 patients, 462 patients developed IVR, and the mean time to the development of IVR was 13.08 ± 0.84 months after RNUx. A total of 30.74% of patients with IVR and 15.32% of those without IVR had a history of bladder cancer (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that a history of bladder cancer, multifocal tumors, use of preoperative ureteroscopy, extravesical bladder cuffing method, lymph node involvement, positive surgical margins, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy were determined to be risk factors for IVR. The conditional IVRF rate was 74.0% at 12 months after RNUx, 87.1% at 24 months after RNUx, 93.6% at 36 months after RNUx, and 97.3% at 60 months after RNUx. The median IVRF survival period was 133.00 months for all patients. In patients with IVRF at 24 months after RNUx, only ureteroscopy was an independent risk factor for IVR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.945, p = 0.040]. In patients with IVRF at ≥36 months, there was no significant factor affecting IVR. Conclusions Active IVR assessment is required until 36 months after RNUx. In addition, patient education and regular screening tests, such as urine analysis and cytology, are required for patients with IVRF for ≥36 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14639. [PMID: 34309982 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. METHODS A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was done and 36 studies included 23 013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; 8178 of them were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14 835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91-66.90, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (MD, -1.71; 95% CI, -2.42 to -1.00, P < .001), lower blood loss (MD, -133.82; 95% CI, -220.92 to -46.73, P = .003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.67, P < .001) and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90, P < .001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2-5-years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.18, P = .46), 2-5-years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.28, P = .68) and 2-5-years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91-1.87, P = .15). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss, transfusion need and overall complication compared with open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:729686. [PMID: 34485377 PMCID: PMC8414582 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this meta-analysis, we will focus on evaluating the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. Methods: A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed, and 36 studies included 23,013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; of them, 8,178 were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14,835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91–66.90, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (MD, −1.71; 95% CI, −2.42 to −1.00, p < 0.001), lower blood loss (MD, −133.82; 95% CI, −220.92 to −46.73, p = 0.003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47–0.67, p < 0.001), and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90, p < 0.001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2–5 years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69–1.18, p = 0.46), 2–5 years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69–1.28, p = 0.68), and 2–5 years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91–1.87, p = 0.15). Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss, transfusion need, and overall complication compared to open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
İzol V, Deger M, Ozden E, Bolat D, Argun B, Baltaci S, Celik O, Akgul HM, Tinay İ, Bayazit Y. The Effect of Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy on Intravesical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma. Urol Int 2020; 105:291-297. [PMID: 33264798 DOI: 10.1159/000511650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) on intravesical recurrence (IVR), in patients with primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of 354 patients, who underwent RNU for UTUC from 10 urology centers between 2005 and 2019, was performed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IVR after RNU. Patients were divided into URS prior to RNU (Group 1) and no URS prior to RNU (Group 2). Rates of IVR after RNU were compared, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate potential predictors of IVR. RESULTS After exclusion, a total of 194 patients were analyzed: Group 1 n = 95 (49.0%) and Group 2 n = 99 (51.0%). In Group 1, a tumor biopsy and histopathological confirmation during URS were performed in 58 (61.1%). The mean follow-up was 39.17 ± 39.3 (range 12-250) months. In 54 (27.8%) patients, IVR was recorded after RNU, and the median recurrence time within the bladder was 10.0 (3-144) months. IVR rate was 38.9% in Group 1 versus 17.2% in Group 2 (p = 0.001). In Group 1, IVR rate was 43.1% in those undergoing intraoperative biopsy versus 32.4% of patients without biopsy during diagnostic URS (p =0.29). Intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS) was longer in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (median IRFS was 111 vs. 60 months in Groups 2 and 1, respectively (p< 0.001)). Univariate analysis revealed that IRFS was significantly associated with URS prior to RNU (HR: 2.9, 95% CI 1.65-5.41; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, URS prior to RNU (HR: 3.5, 95% CI 1.74-7.16; p < 0.001) was found to be an independent prognostic factor for IRFS. CONCLUSION Diagnostic URS was associated with the poor IRFS following RNU for primary UTUC. The decision for a diagnostic URS with or without tumor biopsy should be reserved for cases where this information might influence further treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan İzol
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Deger
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey,
| | - Ender Ozden
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Deniz Bolat
- Department of Urology, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Burak Argun
- Department of Urology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sumer Baltaci
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Orcun Celik
- Department of Urology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Hacı Murat Akgul
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag Namık Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - İlker Tinay
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yildirim Bayazit
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bree K, Matin SF. EDITORIAL COMMENT. Urology 2020; 145:171. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
22
|
Kwon SY, Ko YH, Song PH, Kim BH, Kim BS, Kim TH. The Remaining Ipsilateral Ureteral Orifice Provokes Intravesical Tumor Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study With a Mid-Term Follow-Up. Urology 2020; 145:166-171. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
23
|
Fang D, Singla N, Bao Z, Jafri SM, Su X, Cao Z, Xiong G, Zhang L, Woldu S, Hutchinson R, Sagalowsky A, Lotan Y, Li X, Raman JD, Margulis V, Zhou L. The Significance of Preoperative Serum Sodium and Hemoglobin in Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Multi-Center Analysis Between China and the United States. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:9825-9836. [PMID: 33116841 PMCID: PMC7549885 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s267969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To analyze the effect of preoperative serum sodium and hemoglobin on oncologic outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) based on a multi-center cohort from China and the United States (U.S.). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 775 patients with UTUC treated surgically at tertiary care medical facilities in China or the US from 1998 to 2015. We analyzed associations of preoperative serum sodium and hemoglobin with clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS). Results The US patients had comparatively lower serum sodium and similar hemoglobin at baseline. Preoperative low serum sodium value was associated with tumor multifocality, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI); preoperative anemia was associated with advanced age, tumor multifocality, high tumor grade and LVI. Preoperative low serum sodium was an independent predictor of worse OS in the entire cohort; preoperative anemia was an independent predictor of worse OS and CSS in the US cohort alone, Chinese cohort alone and the combined cohort. We developed a predictive nomogram for OS which exhibited better prognostic value when it included the values of sodium and anemia, and successfully validated it in different cohorts. Conclusion Preoperative low serum sodium and anemia could be informative in predicting worse pathologic and survival outcomes in different UTUC patient ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Zhengqing Bao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Syed M Jafri
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Xiaohong Su
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenpeng Cao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Solomon Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ryan Hutchinson
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Arthur Sagalowsky
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
UroVysion ® predicts intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a prospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 26:178-185. [PMID: 32959230 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01785-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UCUUT) is common. One of the mechanisms driving this is the implantation of cancer cells from the UCUUT at the RNUs. Therefore, their detection after RNU can assist in predicting IVR. This study aimed to examine the utility of UroVysion® as a tool for predicting bladder recurrence after RNU for UCUUT. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 65 patients who received RNU for high-grade UCUUT between October 2013 and April 2017. RESULTS Of the 65 patients, 54 (83.1%) who had both bladder urine samples available immediately after RNU (0 postoperative days: POD) and 5 days after RNU (5POD) were selected. We performed UroVysion® and cytology. Twenty-two patients showed IVR with 32 foci. UroVysion® results at 0POD (26 patients, 48.1%) and/or 5POD (31 patients, 57.4%) were positive in 42 (77.8%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UroVysion® for included cases were measured for both 0POD and 5POD samples; they were determined to be 95.5% (21/22), 34.4% (11/32), 50.0% (21/42), and 91.7% (11/12), respectively. For cytology, these values were 75.0% (15/20), 52.9% (18/34), 48.4% (15/31), and 78.3% (18/23), respectively. Forty-two (64.6%) patients who were UroVysion®-positive demonstrated IVR. The IVR rate between the group positive for either 0POD or 5POD and that negative for both significantly differed for both UroVysion® (p = 0.019) and cytology (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION Multiple urine tests using UroVysion® after RNU could be a useful predictor for IVR.
Collapse
|
25
|
Li YR, Yu KJ, Chang YH, Lin PH, Shao IH, Kan HC, Chu YC, Chuang CK, Pang ST, Liu CY. Predictors of Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy and Prognosis in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:7439-7450. [PMID: 32884355 PMCID: PMC7443413 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s261087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We investigate factors that may contribute individually to bladder recurrence and find out the potential candidate to receive postoperative single dose intravesical chemotherapy. Materials and Methods A total of 217 patients who were diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2012 and 2016 in a single hospital. The possible risk factors that may contribute to development of bladder recurrence and overall survival were analysed. In order to find out the relationship between 1st bladder recurrence timing and outcome, we divided the 54 of 56 patients (2 patients with prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy excluded) with bladder recurrence after RNU into 2 groups, using the median time of 1st bladder recurrence and confirmed with the “minimum P-value” approach. The primary endpoint was the development of relapsing high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The predictive factors of early recurrence and prognostic factors of survival were also analysed. Results Among 217 patients with UTUC under RNU, intravesical recurrence occurred in 56 (25.8%) patients after a median follow-up of 35.2 (1.18–83.34) months. On multivariable analysis, the preoperative ureter manipulation (p=0.009) was a significant predictor for the development of bladder tumours. As for overall survival, renal rein invasion (p=0.017), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p=0.021), and main tumour size (p=0.015) were significant predictors. For 54 patients who developed bladder recurrence, the optimal cut-off point of early recurrence was determined to be 10 months after surgery (p=0.042). Preoperative ureter manipulation (p=0.005) and tumour located both pelvicalyceally and ureterically (P=0.042) were identified as independent factors associated with early recurrence. An end-stage renal disease history and surgical margin positive patient has more late bladder recurrence. Conclusion Bladder recurrence was common in UTUC after RNU. Early bladder recurrence was associated with more relapsing high-risk NMIBC and preoperative ureter manipulation was identified as an independent factor associated with early recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Ren Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Jie Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Hsu Chang
- Department of Urology, New Taipei Municipal Tu Cheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - I-Hung Shao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Cheng Kan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Cheng Chu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Keng Chuang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - See-Tong Pang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yi Liu
- Department of Urology, New Taipei Municipal Tu Cheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Braun AE, Srivastava A, Maffucci F, Kutikov A. Controversies in management of the bladder cuff at nephroureterectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1868-1880. [PMID: 32944551 PMCID: PMC7475677 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for roughly 5% of urothelial carcinomas. Historically, the gold standard for high-risk or bulky low-risk UTUC was an open radical nephroureterectomy with formal bladder cuff excision (BCE). The development of novel endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques has transformed this operation, yet no level I evidence exists at present that demonstrates the superiority of one strategy over another. While new approaches to nephroureterectomy in the last decade have shifted the management paradigm to decrease the morbidity of surgery, controversy continues to surround the approach to the distal ureter and bladder cuff. Debate continues within the urologic community over which surgical approach is best when managing UTUC and how various approaches impact clinical outcomes such as intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific mortality (DSM). When focusing on the existing treatment algorithm, key metrics of quality include (I) removal of the entire specimen en bloc, (II) minimizing the risk of tumor and urine spillage, (III) R0 resection, and (IV) water-tight closure allowing for early use of prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy. In the absence of robust evidence demonstrating a single superior approach, the urologic surgeon should base decisions on technical comfort and each patient's particular clinical circumstance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery E Braun
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fenizia Maffucci
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ko YH, Song PH, Park T, Choi JY. Retrograde pyelography before radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is associated with intravesical tumor recurrence. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46:778-785. [PMID: 32539252 PMCID: PMC7822386 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the association between preoperative retrograde pyelography (RGP), conducted to evaluate upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Materials and Methods: Of 114 patients that underwent RNU, 72 patients without preoperative ureteroscopy and a history of bladder tumor were selectively enrolled. Variables associated with IVR were identified. Results: RGP was performed at a mean duration of 24.9 days prior to RNU in 41 (56.1%) of study subjects. During the mean follow-up period of 64.5 months, IVRs were identified in 32 (44.4%) patients at 22.3±18.8 (mean±SD) months after RNU. Despite similar tumor characteristics in the RGP and non-RGP groups, the incidence of IVR was considerably higher in the RGP group (63.4%) than in the non-RGP group (19.4%, p <0.001). The following variables differed significantly between the IVR and non-IVR groups: age (64.6±8.51 vs. 59.6±9.65 years), tumor location (lower or upper; 53.1% vs. 20%), tumor invasiveness (> pT2; 53.1% vs. 17.5%), preoperative hemoglobin (12.8±1.36 vs. 13.9±1.65), preoperative creatinine (1.29±0.32 vs. 1.11±0.22), and preoperative RGP (81.3% vs. 37.5%), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression model showed that tumor location (p=0.020, HR=2.742), preoperative creatinine level (p=0.004, HR=6.351), and preoperative RGP (p=0.045, HR=3.134) independently predicted IVR. Conclusion: Given the limitations of retrospective single-center series, performance of RGP before RNU was shown to have a negative effect on IVR after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Hwii Ko
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Phil Hyun Song
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Urology, Pusan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Young Choi
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tumor Multifocality is a Significant Risk Factor of Urinary Bladder Recurrence after Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Institutional Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10040201. [PMID: 32260187 PMCID: PMC7235732 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10040201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the significant risk factors of urinary bladder recurrence (UBR) after nephroureterectomy (NUx) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A total of 550 patients diagnosed with UTUC between January 2001 and December 2015 were included in this retrospective study. The median age of our patients was 68 (range 24–93) and the median follow-up time after NUx was 40.3 months (range 8–191). The most important censored point of this study was the first episode of UBR. Of the 550 patients, UBR occurred in 164 patients (29.8%). One hundred and forty-two (86.6%) patients with UBR were identified within two years after NUx for UTUC, with the median time interval between NUx and UBR being 8.4 months (range 3–59.8). Through univariate analysis, the positive surgical margin (p = 0.049) and tumor multifocality (p = 0.024) were both significant prognostic factors for UBR-free survival after NUx in patients with UTUC. However, only tumor multifocality (p = 0.037) remained a significant prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, tumor multifocality is a significant risk factor of UBR after nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare genitourinary entity of the renal pelvis and the ureter characterized by a more aggressive disease phenotype when compared with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) with more than half of UTUC cases presenting with invasive disease at diagnosis compared to 20% for bladder tumors. There is growing evidence suggesting that its distinct natural history from that of bladder cancer can be related to several genetic and epigenetic differences. Treatment of low-risk disease consists of kidney-sparing surgeries such as ureteroscopic and percutaneous treatments, segmental ureterectomy, and adjuvant topical and intracavitary chemo-immunotherapies. The standard of care for high-risk non-metastatic disease remains radical nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision with increasing utilization rates of minimally invasive approaches leading to reduced morbidity without compromising outcomes while the role of lymphadenectomy is still being investigated. The prognosis of UTUC has been stagnant over the past decade highlighting the need for further studies on the role of multimodal therapy (neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy) to optimize management and improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abe T, Kondo T, Harabayashi T, Takada N, Matsumoto R, Osawa T, Minami K, Nagamori S, Maruyama S, Murai S, Tanabe K, Shinohara N. Comparative study of lymph node dissection, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract undergoing regional lymph node dissection. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2018; 48:1001-1011. [PMID: 30272169 PMCID: PMC6203124 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the number of lymph nodes removed as a surrogate marker of the extent of lymph node dissection, and compare survival outcomes between laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) and open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) in patients undergoing standardized lymph node dissection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 214 cTanyN0M0 patients undergoing radical NU with regional lymph node dissection according to the tumor location. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards model were utilized for survival analyses, including recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 114 patients underwent LRNU and 100 underwent ORNU. There was no significant difference in the pT stage, pN stage, or tumor grade, but distal ureteral tumors were more frequent in the LRNU group. The number of lymph nodes removed did not differ between the two groups [LRNU: 12 (median), ORNU: 11.5, P = 0.3852]. Lymph node metastasis was pathologically identified in 19 patients (8.9%). The 5-year RFS (ORNU: 71.7%, LRNU: 74%, P = 0.7829), CSS (77.8 and, 80%, P = 0.8441) and OS (72.8, and 75.9%, P = 0.3456) did not differ between the two groups. In the sub-analysis of pT3/4 patients (n = 83), there were no significant differences in RFS, CSS, or OS between the two groups, although Kaplan–Meier survival curves were slightly better for those receiving ORNU. In the multivariate model, LRNU was not significantly correlated with a poorer RFS, CSS or OS. Conclusion Our data support the feasibility of lymph node dissection with a laparoscopic approach and the equivalent oncological outcome of LRNU compared with ORNU when regional lymph node dissection is performed. However, LRNU should be performed after careful patient selection for advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashige Abe
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Norikata Takada
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keita Minami
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Satoru Maruyama
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Sachiyo Murai
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu Z, Zheng S, Li X, Guo S, Wang Y, Zhou F, Liu ZW. Oncologic Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Ureteroscopy Before Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:1316-1325. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zefu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shiyang Zheng
- Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanjun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuo Wei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu F, Guo W, Zhou X, Ding Y, Ma Y, Hou Y, Kong X, Wang Z. Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e11954. [PMID: 30170392 PMCID: PMC6393120 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000011954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were selected for systematic review of trials that compared outcomes of LNU and ONU. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 13.0 software. RESULTS LNU was associated with longer operation time (P < .001), shorter hospital stay (P < .001), less blood loss (P = .006) and lower rate of transfusion (P < .001). The occurrence of complications, including minor (P = .52), major (P = .21) and total complications (P = .19) were similar between LNU and ONU. There was no significant difference in the rate of 5-year recurrence-free survival (P = .90), 5-year cancer-specific survival (P = .12), and 5-year overall survival (P = .11) as well as 2-year RFS (P = .84), 2-year CSS (P = .86), and 2-year OS (P = .25). CONCLUSION Our results indicated that LNU is a safe and effective method to treat UTUC. Given the limitations of this study, further multicenter, randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Youpeng Ding
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Yanan Ma
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Yi Hou
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Xiangbo Kong
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| | - Zhixin Wang
- Department of Urology, China–Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fukushima H, Kobayashi M, Kawano K, Morimoto S. Effect of Preoperative Bacteriuria and Pyuria on Intravesical Recurrence in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 31:1215-1220. [PMID: 29102949 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM We investigated the effect of bacteriuria and pyuria on intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). PATIENTS AND METHODS Preoperative bacteriuria and pyuria were defined as urine containing ≥5 bacteria/high-power field (HPF) and >5 white blood cells/HPF, respectively. Their associations with IVR were evaluated in 97 patients with UTUC undergoing RNU. RESULTS Preoperative bacteriuria [n=15 (15%)] was significantly associated with preoperative pyuria [n=42 (43%), p<0.001]. During follow-up (median of 19 months), 45 (46%) patients developed IVR (median IVR-free survival=38 months). On multivariate analysis, preoperative bacteriuria was an independent predictor for reduced risk of IVR (hazard ratio=0.23, p=0.010). The 2-year IVR-free survival of patients with preoperative bacteriuria and pyuria was significantly longer than that of patients without preoperative bacteriuria (83% vs. 54%, p=0.028) and pyuria (69% vs. 50%, p=0.024), respectively. CONCLUSION Bacteriuria and pyuria may reduce the risk of IVR in patients with UTUC undergoing RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Fukushima
- Department of Urology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Masaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Keizo Kawano
- Department of Urology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| | - Shinji Morimoto
- Department of Urology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Guan B, Xing Y, Xiong G, Cao Z, Fang D, Li Y, Zhan Y, Peng D, Liu L, Li X, Zhou L. Predictive value of gene methylation for second recurrence following surgical treatment of first bladder recurrence of a primary upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2018; 15:9397-9405. [PMID: 29805663 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical relevance of aberrant DNA promoter methylation is being increasingly recognized in urothelial carcinoma. The present study was conducted to explore the methylation status of patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who experienced bladder recurrence, and to evaluate the predictive value of gene methylation for second bladder recurrence and tumor progression. A total of 85 patients with primary UTUC, who experienced bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy, were enrolled between January 2001 and December 2013. Using methylation-sensitive polymerase chain reaction, the promoter methylation statuses of 10 genes were analyzed in the bladder tumor specimens. Among the patient group, 32 patients experienced second bladder recurrence, and bladder progression was detected in 16. With the exception of BRCA1, the methylation rate of the majority of genes tended to gradually increase to varying extents with the number of recurrences; a smaller proportion of primary tumors exhibited gene methylation when compared with the first recurrent tumors and second recurrent tumors. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that unmethylated GDF15 [hazard ratio (HR)=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-0.92] and methylated VIM (HR=2.91; 95% CI, 1.11-7.61) in the first recurrent bladder tumor, as well as male gender (HR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.06-4.87), first recurrence interval <8 months (HR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.15-4.78) and primary UTUC tumor size ≥5 cm (HR=3.48; 95% CI, 1.43-8.45) were independent risk factors for a second bladder recurrence after surgery for the first bladder recurrence; the Harrell's concordance index (c-index) for the related nomogram was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61-0.81). Furthermore, methylated CDH1 (HR=2.91; 95% CI, 1.08-7.77) and VIM (HR=4.91; 95% CI, 1.11-21.7) in the first recurrent bladder tumor, male gender (HR=3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.73), and primary tumor stage T2-T4 (HR=4.57; 95% CI, 1.22-17.13), multifocality (HR=3.64; 95% CI, 1.19-11.16) and size ≥5 cm (HR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.91-10.54) for the primary UTUC were considered to be predictors of tumor progression; the c-index for the nomogram was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-0.92). The present findings demonstrated that promoter methylation of cancer-related genes was frequently observed in patients with urothelial carcinoma, and that the gene methylation rate of certain genes tended to gradually increase with the number of bladder recurrences. This may be used as a predictive factor for a second bladder recurrence and tumor progression after the surgical treatment of the first bladder recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao Guan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Yunchao Xing
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Gengyan Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Zhenpeng Cao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Yifan Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Yonghao Zhan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Ding Peng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Libo Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim HS, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Association between demographic factors and prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:7464-7476. [PMID: 27448978 PMCID: PMC5352335 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of demographic factors, including age, sex, performance status, smoking status, obesity, and race in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted PubMed search for all articles published until December 2014 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Survival outcomes of interest were intravesical recurrence (IVR) free survival, progression free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Seventy-nine studies, including numbers of subjects ranging from 24 to 9899, met the inclusion criteria. Advanced age was significantly associated with worse PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01] and OS (HR 1.05). The significant predictors of CSS were age (HR 1.02) and performance status (HR 1.35). Female gender (HR 0.81) and smoking (HR 1.38) were the significant predictors only for IVR free survival. No significant associations with survival outcomes were observed in obesity and race. Our study reveals that age is one of the most important demographic predictor of survival in UTUC. Also, male gender, poor performance status, and smoking are also significantly related to worse survival outcomes. However, large well-designed prospective studies are required to investigate the precise prognostic significance of demographics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Urology, Dongguk University Ilsan Medical Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tan P, Xie N, Yang L, Liu L, Tang Z, Wei Q. Diagnostic Ureteroscopy Prior to Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Increased the Risk of Intravesical Recurrence. Urol Int 2017; 100:92-99. [DOI: 10.1159/000484417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
37
|
Guo RQ, Hong P, Xiong GY, Zhang L, Fang D, Li XS, Zhang K, Zhou LQ. Impact of ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinomas on oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2017; 121:184-193. [PMID: 29032580 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Run-Qi Guo
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Peng Hong
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Geng-Yan Xiong
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Xue-Song Li
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Li-Qun Zhou
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yamashita S, Ito A, Mitsuzuka K, Ioritani N, Ishidoya S, Ikeda Y, Numahata K, Orikasa K, Tochigi T, Soma F, Namima T, Arai Y. Efficacy of early ureteral ligation on prevention of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a prospective single-arm multicenter clinical trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47:870-875. [DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Yamashita
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Koji Mitsuzuka
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| | - Naomasa Ioritani
- Department of Urology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Sendai Hospital, Sendai
| | | | | | - Kenji Numahata
- Department of Urology, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata
| | | | | | - Fumihiko Soma
- Department of Urology, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe
| | | | - Yoichi Arai
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with pluck method for distal ureter resection. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urols.2016.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
40
|
Yoo S, You D, Jeong IG, Hong B, Hong JH, Ahn H, Kim CS. Impact of Tumor Location on Local Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Implications for Adjuvant Radiotherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e199-e204. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2016] [Revised: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
41
|
Lu DD, Boorjian SA, Raman JD. Intravesical chemotherapy use after radical nephroureterectomy: A national survey of urologic oncologists. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:113.e1-113.e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
42
|
Prolonged pneumoperitoneum time is an independent risk factor for intravesical recurrence after laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Surg Oncol 2017; 26:73-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
43
|
Redrow GP, Guo CC, Brausi MA, Coleman JA, Fernandez MI, Kassouf W, Keeley FX, Margulis V, Raman JD, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Spiess PE, Thalmann GN, Matin SF. Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma In Situ: Current Knowledge, Future Direction. J Urol 2017; 197:287-295. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Grant P. Redrow
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Division of Urology, University of Texas at Houston School of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles C. Guo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Jonathan A. Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Francis X. Keeley
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, U.T. Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jay D. Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Department of Urology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié–Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie GRC5, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philippe E. Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - George N. Thalmann
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Surena F. Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yoo S, You D, Song C, Hong B, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ahn H, Jeong IG. Risk of Intravesical Recurrence After Ureteroscopic Biopsy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Does the Location Matter? J Endourol 2016; 31:259-265. [PMID: 27785917 DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate whether ureteroscopic biopsy (URS-Bx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) before radical nephroureterectomy affects intravesical recurrence (IVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS Of the 515 patients receiving radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 1998 and 2012, 387 patients were included for the analysis. URS-Bx was performed in 69 patients (17.8%). Patients were stratified according to tumor location, and the impact of URS-Bx on IVR was evaluated after adjusting for other clinicopathologic variables. RESULTS IVR occurred in 163 patients (42.1%). The postoperative 5-year IVR-free survival was not significantly different according to URS-Bx in the overall patient group (54.0% vs 39.3%, p = 0.056). In patients with renal pelvic tumor, IVR-free probability was lower in patients with URS-Bx than in patients without URS-Bx (39.6% vs 62.2%, p = 0.012), although IVR-free survival in patients with ureteral tumor was equivalent (36.7% vs 45.8%, p = 0.946). In multivariate analysis, previous bladder tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; p = 0.016) were a significant risk factor for IVR in all patients and ureteral tumor location (HR, 1.35; p = 0.071) was associated with IVR, although statistical significance was not achieved. In patients with renal pelvic tumor, URS-Bx HR, 1.98; p = 0.020 was the only risk factor for IVR. However, URS-Bx was not associated with IVR in patients with ureteral tumor, although previous bladder tumor HR, 1.74; p = 0.028 was a risk factor for IVR. CONCLUSION URS-Bx is a significant risk factor for IVR in patients with renal pelvic tumor and should be performed after sufficient consideration in these patients if other examinations are uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjun Yoo
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - Dalsan You
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheryn Song
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - Bumsik Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Hyuk Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - Choung-Soo Kim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| | - In Gab Jeong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhang S, Luo Y, Wang C, Fu SJ, Yang L. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 2016; 4:e2063. [PMID: 27280069 PMCID: PMC4893337 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Several factors have been validated as predictors of disease recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. However, the oncological outcomes between different surgical approaches (open nephroureterectomy versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, ONU vs LNU) remain controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological outcomes associated with different surgical approaches. Methods. We conducted an electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and Cochrane Library electronic databases through November 2015, screened the retrieved references, collected and evaluated the relevant information. We extracted and synthesized the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using Stata 13. Results. Twenty-one observational studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed no differences in the intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS), unspecified recurrence-free survival (UnRFS) and overall survival (OS) between LNUandONU. However, improvements in the extravesical recurrence free survival (ExRFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were observed inLNU. The pooled hazard ratios were 1.05 (95% CI [0.92–1.18]) for IRFS, 0.80 (95% CI [0.64–0.96]) for ExRFS, 1.10 (95% CI [0.93–1.28]) for UnRFS, 0.91 (95% CI [0.66–1.17]) for OS and 0.79 (95% CI [0.68–0.91]) for CSS. Conclusion. Based on current evidence, LNU could provide equivalent prognostic effects for upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and had better oncological control of ExRFS and CSS compared to ONU. However, considering all eligible studies with the intrinsic bias of retrospective study design, the results should be interpreted with caution. Prospective randomized trials are needed to verify these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Zhang
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - You Luo
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - Cheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - Sheng-Jun Fu
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Urology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital , Lan Zhou , China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yamashita S, Ito A, Mitsuzuka K, Tochigi T, Namima T, Soma F, Aizawa M, Ioritani N, Kaiho Y, Arai Y. Clinical implications of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2016; 23:378-84. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.13054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Yamashita
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Koji Mitsuzuka
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Tatsuo Tochigi
- Department of Urology; Miyagi Cancer Center; Natori Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Takashige Namima
- Department of Urology; Tohoku Rosai Hospital; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Fumihiko Soma
- Department of Urology; Hachinohe City Hospital; Hachinohe Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Masataka Aizawa
- Department of Urology; Japan Community Health Care Organization Sendai Hospital; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Naomasa Ioritani
- Department of Urology; Japan Community Health Care Organization Sendai Hospital; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kaiho
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| | - Yoichi Arai
- Department of Urology; Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Sendai Japan
- Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group; Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sung HH, Jeon HG, Han DH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM, Choi HY, Jeon SS. Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy Is Associated with Increased Intravesical Recurrence following Radical Nephroureterectomy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0139976. [PMID: 26556239 PMCID: PMC4640521 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is powerful tool to confirm upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, URS and associated manipulation may be related to the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We aimed to investigate whether preoperative ureterorenoscopy would increase IVR after RNU in patients with UTUC. We performed a retrospective analysis of 630 patients who had RNU with bladder cuff excision due to UTUC. Diagnostic URS was performed in 282 patients (44.7%). Patients were divided into two groups according to the URS. Survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression model were performed to address risk factors for the IVR. The interval from URS to RNU was measured. During URS, manipulation such as biopsy and resection was determined. The median age was 64 (IQR 56–72) years with follow-up duration of 34.3 (15.7–64.9) months. Median time from URS to RNU was 16 (0–38) days. The IVR developed in 42.5% (n = 268) patients at 8.2 (4.9–14.7) months. The five-year IVR-free survival rate was 42.6 ± 8.0% and 63.6 ± 6.9% in patients with and without preoperative URS, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, previous history of bladder tumour, extravesical excision of distal ureter, multifocal tumour, and URS (HR, 95% CI; 1.558, 1.204–2.016, P = 0.001) were independent predictors for higher IVR. The IVR rate in patients without manipulation during URS was not different to those with manipulation (P = 0.658). The duration from URS to RNU was not associated with IVR (P = 0.799). Diagnostic URS for UTUC increased IVR rate after RNU. However, the lessening of interval from URS to radical surgery or URS without any manipulation could not reduce the IVR rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deok Hyun Han
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han-Yong Choi
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lee JK, Kim KB, Park YH, Oh JJ, Lee S, Jeong CW, Jeong SJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE. Correlation Between the Timing of Diagnostic Ureteroscopy and Intravesical Recurrence in Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:e37-41. [PMID: 26459040 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Accepted: 07/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED To identify the effects of diagnostic ureteroscopy on intravesical recurrence, 104 patients who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy were analyzed. The number of patients with intravesical recurrence was 34 (32.6%) at a mean of 37 months. Multivariate Cox model analysis revealed that delayed nephroureterectomy after diagnostic ureteroscopy were independent predictive factors for intravesical recurrence. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) relative to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) on intravesical recurrence (IVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 104 patients who had undergone RNU for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) at a single tertiary referral center between March 2003 and December 2012. All patients were divided depending on the timing of diagnostic URS: the no URS group (30 patients, no URS), 1-session group (33 patients, diagnostic URS immediately followed by RNU), and 2-session group (41 patients, RNU after diagnostic URS at a median time of 5 days). We analyzed for IVR-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression methods. RESULTS Of the 104 patients, 34 (32.6%) developed subsequent IVR at a mean interval of 7.2 months. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the IVR rate was significantly greater in the 2-session group than in the other groups (P = .004). Univariate analysis indicated no effect on IVR in the 1-session group compared with the no URS group (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58; 0.517-4.833). However, the 2-session group had a significantly greater number of patients with IVR than the no URS group (HR, 3.82; 95% CI 1.438-10.131). Multivariate Cox proportional analysis revealed that the 2-session group was an independent predictor of IVR in UTUC patients (HR, 3.61; 95% CI 1.039-12.557). CONCLUSION Delay of RNU after diagnostic URS significantly increased the risk of IVR in UTUC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Keun Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University of Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Bom Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Hyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Jin Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Jin Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Eun Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Seisen T, Granger B, Colin P, Léon P, Utard G, Renard-Penna R, Compérat E, Mozer P, Cussenot O, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2015; 67:1122-1133. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
50
|
Ureteral involvement and diabetes increase the risk of subsequent bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:527976. [PMID: 25874217 PMCID: PMC4385618 DOI: 10.1155/2015/527976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2014] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the prognostic factors for bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC). METHODS From 1994 to 2012, 695 patients with UUT-UC treated with RNU were enrolled in National Taiwan University Medical Center. Among them, 532 patients with no prior bladder UC history were recruited for analysis. We assessed the impact of potentially prognostic factors on bladder recurrence after RNU. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 47.8 months. In the Cox model, ureteral involvement and diabetes mellitus (DM) were significantly associated with a higher bladder recurrence rate in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.838; P = 0.003 and HR: 1.821; P = 0.010, resp.). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, DM patients with concomitant ureteral UC experienced about a threefold increased risk of bladder recurrence as compared to those without both factors (HR: 3.222; P < 0.001). Patients with either of the two risk factors experienced about a twofold increased risk as compared to those without both factors (with DM, HR: 2.184, P = 0.024; with ureteral involvement, HR: 2.006, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Ureteral involvement and DM are significantly related to bladder recurrence after RNU in patients with UUT-UC.
Collapse
|