Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy

Urinary incontinence is a common and predictable consequence among men with localized prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Despite advances in the surgical technique, urinary continence recovery time remains variable. A range of surgical and patient-related risk factors contributing to urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy have been described, including age, BMI, membranous urethral length and urethral sphincter insufficiency. Physical activity interventions incorporating aerobic exercise, resistance training and pelvic floor muscle training programmes can positively influence the return to continence in men after radical prostatectomy. Traditional approaches to improving urinary continence after radical prostatectomy have typically focused on interventions delivered during the postoperative period (rehabilitation). However, the limited efficacy of these postoperative approaches has led to a shift from the traditional reactive model of care to more comprehensive interventions incorporating exercise-based programmes that begin in the preoperative period (prehabilitation) and continue after surgery. Comprehensive prehabilitation interventions include appropriately prescribed aerobic exercise, resistance training and specific pelvic floor muscle instruction and exercise training programmes. Transperineal ultrasonography is a non-invasive and validated method for the visualization of the action of the pelvic floor musculature, providing real-time visual biofeedback to the patient during specific pelvic floor muscle instruction and training. Importantly, the waiting time before surgery can be used for the delivery of comprehensive prehabilitation exercise-based interventions to increase patient preparedness in the lead-up to surgery and optimize continence and health-related quality-of-life outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes

The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of prostate biopsy on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).A total of 181 patients who underwent the RALP in our institution have been retrospectively reviewed, patients were divided into different groups according to the interval of biopsy to RALP and core numbers of biopsy. Perioperative outcomes including estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), surgical margin status, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were served as endpoints.Interval of biopsy to RALP was not significantly correlated with any perioperative outcomes, while the biopsy core numbers had significant correlation with the EBL. In logistic regression analysis, the biopsy core numbers were associated with higher risk of positive surgical margins. Body mass index (BMI) was also a significant factor related to OT.Delay of the RALP after biopsy was not applicable in the era of RALP and surgeons could be more freely in selecting the time of RALP. Besides, further studies should focus on how to improve the diagnostic efficiency of prostate cancer without increasing the incidence of surgical complications.