Risk factors of severe incisional hernia after renal transplantation: a retrospective multicentric case–control study on 225 patients

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing direct access to the abdominal cavity in urological surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central from 1980 to the present according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Eighty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this analysis, and meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed.

RESULTS

The total incidence in the 84 studies was 4.8% (95% CI 3.7% - 6.2%) I2 93.84%. Depending on the type of incision, it was higher in the open medial approach: 7.1% (95% CI 4.3%-11.8%) I2 92.45% and lower in laparoscopic surgery: 1.9% (95% CI 1%-3.4%) I2 71, 85% According to access, it was lower in retroperitoneal: 0.9% (95% CI 0.2%-4.8%) I2 76.96% and off-midline: 4.7% (95% CI 3.5%-6.4%) I2 91.59%. Regarding the location of the hernia, parastomal hernias were more frequent: 15.1% (95% CI 9.6% - 23%) I2 77.39%. Meta-regression shows a significant effect in reducing the proportion of hernias in open lateral, laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared to medial open access.

CONCLUSION

The present review finds the access through the midline and stomas as the ones with the highest incidence of incisional hernia. The use of the lateral approach or minimally invasive techniques is preferable. More prospective studies are warranted to obtain the real incidence of incisional hernias and evaluate the role of better techniques to close the abdomen.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management of Incisional Hernias After Kidney Transplant: A 20-Year Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernias (IH) constitute a complication after kidney transplant (KT). Patients may be particularly at risk because of comorbidities and immunosuppression. The study aim was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of IH in patients undergoing KT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent KT between January 1998 and December 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative parameters, and IH repair characteristics were assessed. Postoperative outcomes included morbidity, mortality, need for reoperation, and length of stay (LOS). Patients who developed IH were compared with those who did not develop one.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (6.4%) developed an IH after a median delay of 14 months (IQR, 6-52 months) in 737 KTs. On uni- and multivariate analyses, body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.080; P = .020), pulmonary diseases (OR, 2.415; P = .012), postoperative lymphoceles (OR, 2.362; P = .018), and LOS (OR, 1.013; P = .044) were independent risk factors. Thirty-eight patients (81%) underwent operative IH repair, and 37 (97%) were treated with a mesh. The median LOS was 8 days (IQR, 6-11 days). Three patients (8%) developed surgical site infections, and 2 patients (5%) presented hematomas requiring surgical revision. After IH repair, 3 patients (8%) had a recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of IH after KT seems rather low. Overweight, pulmonary comorbidities, lymphoceles, and LOS were identified as independent risk factors. Strategies focusing on the modifiable patient-related risk factors and early detection and treatment of lymphoceles may help to decrease the risk of IH formation after KT.

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair of a large incisional hernia in a kidney transplantation patient: A case report

A 73-year-old woman presented to our hospital because of painful bulging in the right lower abdomen, and developed a 17 × 12 cm incisional hernia after kidney transplantation using right oblique incision. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair was performed. Since a transplanted kidney is close to the abdominal wall defect, the space between the transplanted kidney and the abdominal wall was peeled off to secure enough space for the mesh to be place. After that the fascial defect was detected precisely, and the polypropylene-polyglycolic acid composite mesh was fixed with 3 cm overlapping of the hernia ring by non-absorbable tacks. The patient was discharged 9 days after surgery. In general, abdominal incisional hernias after kidney transplantation are relatively large with boundary defect of abdominal wall ensuing between the abdominal and allograft. However, laparoscopic IPOM repair of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation can be performed safely and effectively.

Abdominal wall complications after kidney transplantation: A clinical review

Introduction

Abdominal wall complications are common after kidney transplantation, and although they have a minor impact on patient and graft survival, they increase the patient's morbidity and may have an impact on quality of life. Abdominal wall complications have an overall incidence of 7.7–21%.

Methods

This review will explore the natural history of abdominal wall complications in the kidney transplant setting, with a special focus on wound dehiscence and incisional herni, with a particular emphasis on risk factors, clinical characteristics, and treatment.

Results

Many patient‐related risk factors have been suggested, including older age, obesity, and smoking, but kidney transplant recipients have an additional risk related to the use of immunosuppression. Wound dehiscence usually does not require surgical intervention. However, for deep dehiscence involving the fascial layer with concomitant infection, surgical treatment and/or negative pressure wound therapy may be required.

Conclusions

Incisional hernia (IH) may affect 1.1–18% of kidney transplant recipients. Most patients require surgical treatment, either open or laparoscopic. Mesh repair is considered the gold standard for the treatment of IH, since it is associated with a low rate of postoperative complications and an acceptable rate of recurrence. Biologic mesh could be an attractive alternative in patients with graft exposition or infection.

Reconstrucción de la pared abdominal en pacientes con inmunosupresión: experiencia en una institución de alta complejidad

Introducción. Los pacientes con inmunosupresión llevados a cirugía abdominal convencional tienen un mayor riesgo de desarrollar hernias incisionales en el posoperatorio, y cuando ellas ocurren, es necesario individualizar el procedimiento quirúrgico de elección, según las características anatómicas, fisiológicas y clínicas de cada paciente. Este estudio describe las características demográficas y clínicas de los pacientes con inmunosupresión, llevados a reconstrucción de la pared abdominal, y sus desenlaces después de 30 días del procedimiento quirúrgico. Métodos. Serie de casos de pacientes con inmunosupresión llevados a reconstrucción de la pared abdominal, en un centro especializado de cuarto nivel de complejidad. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años, operados en el período de enero de 2016 a diciembre de 2019. Resultados. Se presenta una serie de 18 pacientes, cinco (27,7 %) con algún tipo de inmunosupresión primaria y 13 (72,2 %) con algún tipo de inmunosupresión secundaria. La edad promedio fue de 56 años, 11 (61 %) fueron mujeres, el peso promedio de los participantes fue de 73,3 kg. Se encontraron complicaciones en ocho pacientes (44,4 %). Dos pacientes requirieron manejo en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, por un máximo de tres días. Ninguno de los pacientes presentó recidiva de la hernia ni mortalidad. Discusión. La reconstrucción de la pared abdominal en pacientes inmunosuprimidos representa un reto para cualquier equipo quirúrgico debido a las condiciones especiales de los pacientes y a las variables asociadas al procedimiento. Las tasas de recidiva y de complicaciones de este estudio, se asemejan a las descritas en la literatura.

Incarceration of transplanted kidney through incisional hernia

Transplanted allograft kidney herniation through an incisional hernia resulting in incarceration is a rare condition with only one other similar case reported in the literature. The primary imaging modalities used to diagnose kidney herniation are graft ultrasound, abdominal computed tomography and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging [Sugi et al. (Imaging of renal transplant complications throughout the life of the allograft: comprehensive multimodality review. Radiographics 2019;39:1327-1355)]. Treatment should be based on patient’s symptoms. This case report highlights the initial presentation of hematuria in a 57-year-old male that eventually led to the diagnosis of a right-sided incarcerated grafted kidney through an incisional hernia. Subsequently, the patient underwent transplant nephrectomy.

Risk Factors and Optimal Methods for Incisional Hernias After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience From Asia

BACKGROUND

For kidney transplant patients, incisional hernia (IH) is a major complication resulting from prolonged pretransplant dialysis, immunosuppressive drugs, and the high prevalence of diabetes. However, there have been relatively few studies of IH after kidney transplantation (KT) in Japan and in the greater Asian population. Additionally, operative methods for IH repair have not been established.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 465 consecutive patients who underwent KT at our hospital from April 2013 to March 2019. Patients who underwent incisional hernia repair were included in this study, and the follow-up time was extended to September 2020. We defined severe IH as an IH requiring surgical repair. We examine the risk factors for severe IH among KT patients and also discuss the operative methods of IH repair.

RESULTS

During the study period, 7 patients developed severe IH after KT. The cumulative occurrence rate for severe IH was 1.1% 1 year postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age at KT and dialysis duration (hazard ratio = 1.112, P = .016; hazard ratio = 1.106, respectively; P = .038) were independent risk factors for severe IH. We used polypropylene mesh for IH repair in all cases, with onlay repair performed in 5 of 7 cases. There was no recurrence or infection after mesh repair during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, age at KT and dialysis duration were independent risk factors for severe IH in the Japanese population. Onlay repair with a polypropylene mesh appeared to be a safe and acceptable operation for IH repair after KT.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Post-Abdominal Transplant Hernia: Can We Predict Size and Onset?

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal organ transplant is a life-saving treatment. However, the resultant weakening of abdominal muscles leaves patients susceptible to incisional hernia. Obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus are common risk factors for post-transplant hernia. However, the literature is void on the impact these risk factors have on timing and size of hernia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all post-abdominal transplant patients who underwent hernia repair in 2010-2017 at a single institution. Primary outcomes were hernia size and time from transplant to hernia repair.

RESULTS

We identified 31 patients. The majority of patients were female (15 male, 16 female), and the average patient was 56 ± 8.7 years old and obese (body mass index 30.6). Smoking (26.7%, n = 8) and diabetes mellitus (51.6%, n = 16) were prevalent. Transplant types represented were renal (n = 24), simultaneous pancreas-kidney (n = 5), liver (n = 1), and liver with subsequent kidney (n = 1). The median size of hernia was 100.0 cm² (interquartile range [IQR]: 78.5-234.0), and median time to hernia repair was 53.0 months (IQR: 12.5-110.0). Risk factors (obesity, smoking, and diabetes) did not influence hernia size, nor alter time to hernia repair.

CONCLUSION

Obesity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus are not prognostic of size or onset of post-transplant incisional hernia. Large cohort studies are needed to determine predictive factors of size and onset of hernia.

Optimal surgical management in kidney and pancreas transplantation to minimise wound complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immunosuppression in transplant patients increases the risk of wound complications. However, an optimal surgical approach to kidney and pancreas transplantation can minimise this risk.

Materials and methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine factors contributing to incisional hernia formation in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients. Bias appraisal of studies was conducted via the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We considered recipient factors, surgical methods, and complications of repair.

Results

The rate of incisional hernia formation in recipients of kidney and pancreas transplants was 4.4% (CI 95% 2.6-7.3, p < 0.001). Age above or below 50 years did not predict hernia formation (Q (1) = 0.09, p = 0.77). Body mass index (BMI) above 25 (10.8%, CI 95% 3.2-30.9, p < 0.001) increased the risk of an incisional hernia. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use significantly reduced the risk of incisional hernia from 11.9% (CI 95% 4.3-28.7, p < 0.001) to 3.8% (CI 95% 2.5-5.7, p < 0.001), Q (1) = 4.25, p = 0.04. Sirolimus significantly increased the rate of incisional hernia formation from 3.7% (CI 95% 1.7-7.1, p < 0.001) to 18.1% (CI 95% 11.7-27, p < 0.001), Q (1) = 13.97, p < 0.001. While paramedian (4.1% CI 95% 1.7-9.4, p < 0.001) and Rutherford-Morrison incisions (5.6% CI 95% 2.5-11.7, p < 0.001) were associated with a lower rate of hernia compared to hockey-stick incisions (8.5% CI 95% 3.1-21.2, p < 0.001) these differences were not statistically significant (Q (1) = 1.38, p = 0.71). Single layered closure (8.1% CI 95% 4.9-12.8, p < 0.001) compared to fascial closure (6.1% CI 95% 3.4-10.6, p < 0.001) did not determine the rate of hernia formation [Q (1) = 0.55, p = 0.46].

Conclusions

Weight reduction and careful immunosuppression selection can reduce the risk of a hernia. Rutherford-Morrison incisions along with single-layered closure represent a safe and effective technique reducing operating time and costs.