The "old" 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size

Assessment of Factors Responsible for Stone-Free Status After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Aim The study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors that determined stone-free rate (SFR) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and methods This prospective study was conducted on 183 patients undergoing RIRS for renal stones. Patients were categorized into two groups, depending on stone-free status one month following the procedure. SFR was defined as the complete absence of stones or stones <4 mm. The parameters studied included patient demographics, presence of hydronephrosis, presence of preoperative double J-stent, abnormal renal anatomy, and stone characteristics (stone burden, stone number, stone density, stone location, lower pole infundibulopelvic angle, and lower pole renal infundibular length (RIL)). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for residual stones. We assessed the predictive ability of the RIRS score and Resorlu-Unsal stone score (RUSS) for evaluating SFR utilizing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results 183 patients were included in the study with a median age of 51 years. 131 (71.6%) patients were declared stone-free after the procedure. The mean stone size and density were 16.9 SD±7.5 mm and 1038 SD±342 Hounsfield units (HU) respectively. Stone-free patients had lower stone size (14.3 mm vs. 23.6 mm, p<0.01) and stone density (970 HU vs. 1211 HU, p<0.01) compared to non-stone-free patients. Patients with residual stones had steeper lower pole renal infundibulopelvic angle (RIPA) (31.3° vs. 40.7°, p<0.01) and longer RIL (26.6 mm vs. 21.1 mm, p<0.01). Stone multiplicity (p<0.01), lower pole stone location (p<0.01), and renal malformations (p<0.01) were significant influencing factors for residual renal stones after RIRS. Multivariate analysis revealed stone size, stone density (HU), and stone location as independent predictors for SFR after RIRS. Among the scoring systems, the RIRS score had the highest diagnostic accuracy for SFR (area under the curve (AUC): -0.882, 95% CI-0.828-0.936). Conclusion Stone size, stone density (HU), and stone number are important predictors of SFR after RIRS. Lower pole stone location and abnormal renal anatomy play a substantial role in determining SFR after RIRS. In lower pole stones, a long RIL and acute RIPA negatively influence SFR. Additionally, the RIRS score was found to be a better predictor for SFR than the RUSS score.

New infundibulopelvic angle measurement method can predict stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery

To enhance the accuracy of predicting stone-free rates after retrograde intrarenal surgery, we devised a novel approach to assess the renal infundibulopelvic angle. We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for those who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones between April 2018 and August 2019. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative data were recorded. Subsequently, we introduced a modified angle measurement called the pelvic stone angle and evaluated its predictive performance for stone-free rates by comparing it with the traditional method in scoring systems. A total of 43 individuals were included in this study. Notable differences in stone burden and Hounsfield unit measurements were found between stone-free and non-stone-free patients. The pelvic stone angle demonstrated a good model fit when used in scoring systems, performing equally well as the conventional approach. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the R.I.R.S. scoring system using the pelvic stone angle and the conventional approach did not show a significant difference. In conclusion, the predictive ability of the pelvic stone angle for stone-free rates was comparable to the old measurement method. Moreover, scoring systems using the pelvic stone angle exhibited a better model fit than those using the conventional approach.

A multicentric non-randomized prospective observational study on the clinical efficiency of thulium fibre laser in large volume stones (> 1000 mm3)

PURPOSE

Our objective was to analyse the clinical efficiency of TFL in large volume stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with large volume renal stones (> 1000 mm3) operated at two different centres, from May 2020 to April 2021, were enrolled in this study. Retrograde intrarenal surgery was performed using 60W Superpulse thulium fibre laser™ (IPG Photonics, Russia). Demographic data, stone parameters, laser time, and total operating time were recorded, and laser efficacy (J/mm3) and ablation speed (mm3/s) were calculated. NCCT KUB was done at 3 months postoperatively to calculate stone-free rate.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were included and analysed in the study. Mean stone volume was 1753.12 ± 1245.81 (1169.27-2193.25) mm3, mean stone density was 1104.46 ± 313.09 (875.00-1317.00) HU, mean laser time was 537.79 ± 689.89 (21.00-1080.00) sec, mean operating time was 43.38 ± 12.96 (35.00-51.25) min, mean laser efficacy was 20.30 ± 15.5 (8.88-25.57) J/mm3, and mean ablation speed was 1.32 ± 0.7 (0.82-1.64) mm3/sec. A strong positive correlation was found between the stone volume and ablation speed (r = 0.659, p = 0.000), and a moderate negative correlation was found between the stone volume and laser efficacy (J/mm3) (r = - 0.392, p = 0.000). With increasing volume of the stone, J/mm3 decreased significantly and ablation speed increased significantly (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 21.05% (16/76) patients, most of which were Clavien grades 1-2. Overall SFR is 96.05%.

CONCLUSION

Laser efficiency increases at higher stone volumes (> 1000 mm3), as less energy is required to ablate every mm3 of stone.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones utilizing stone displacement technique yields excellent results

Objective

To evaluate the long-term stone-free rate (SFR) of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi using only basket relocation and identify independent predictors of stone-free status.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing RIRS lower pole renal calculi at a single high-volume tertiary center were analyzed retrospectively. Lower pole stones were relocated to the upper pole, where laser lithotripsy was performed. All patients were followed up in the clinic following the surgery and yearly thereafter. The stone-free status was assessed with a combination of an abdominal ultrasound and abdominal X-ray, or an abdominal non-contrast computed tomography if the stones were known to be radiolucent.

Results

A total of 480 consecutive patients who underwent RIRS for treatment of lower pole renal calculi, between January 2012 and December 2018, were analyzed from a prospectively maintained database of 3000 ureteroscopies. With a median follow-up time of 18.6 months, the mean SFR was 94.8%. The procedures were unsuccessful in 26 (5.4%) patients due to unreachable stones. The median stone size of the unreachable stones was 12 mm (range 10-30 mm). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed two predictors of SFR for lower pole stones: a small cumulative stone burden (odds ratio [OR]: 0.903, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.867-0.941, p<0.0001) and preoperative ureteral stent insertion (OR: 0.515, 95% CI: 0.318-0.835, p=0.007).

Conclusion

The long-term SFR of RIRS for the treatment of lower pole stones with basket displacement with appropriate patient selection is high.

Impact of Preoperative Stenting on the Outcome of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative stenting (POS) on the perioperative outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the PRISMA statement. From the initially retrieved 609 reports, we excluded the ineligible studies at 2 stages. We only included studies that contained fURS patients with and without POS in the same report. Data of patients who underwent semirigid ureteroscope only were excluded from the analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) system was applied for risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies including 5,852 patients were involved. 48.5% of the patients had preoperative stent. Stone-free rate was significantly higher with prestenting; odds ratio (OR) was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.51-2.58) (Z = 5.02; p = 0.00001). It also displayed tendency toward lower complications; OR was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.52-1.05) (Z = 1.67; p = 0.09). POS significantly increased the use of ureteral access sheath; OR was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.05-2.13) (Z = 2.22; p = 0.03). Risk of bias assessment showed 13 and 7 studies with low and moderate risk, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

POS clearly improves the stone-free rates after fURS. It might reduce the complications, especially ureteral injury. These findings might help solve the current debate and can be useful for urologists during patient counselling for a proper decision-making.

Is Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery as Safe for Children as It Is for Adults?

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) among the children and adults with similar stone burdens and locations. Also, the secondary aim of this study is to identify the factors affecting the stone-free rates (SFRs) of RIRS.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared perioperative results, SFRs, and complication rates (CRs) between pediatric (group 1, n: 55) and adult (group 2, n: 220) age groups diagnosed with kidney stones and treated by flexible ureterorenoscopy using the same instruments. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was performed to determine the factors affecting the SFR.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients (pediatric group: 55; adult group: 220) were included in this study. The mean age of pediatric and adult groups was 7.2 ± 5.3 and 43.9 ± 15.1, respectively. The mean stone size was 13.9 ± 6.6 mm in the pediatric group compared to 14.8 ± 6.7 mm in the adult group (p = 0.35). Stone localizations and number were similar. JJ stenting for passive dilatation and use of UAS were higher in the pediatric group (p = 0.002; p = 0.017). However, postoperative double pigtail stenting rate was higher in the adult group (p < 0.001). Total CR was 13.8% and mostly Clavien I-II, and no difference was observed between the 2 groups (p = 0.541). The SFRs between the groups were similar (pediatric group: 81.8%; adult group: 78.2%; p = 0.554). On multivariate analysis, stone size (p < 0.001) and lower calyx stone (p < 0.001) were the negative predictive factors for SFR.

CONCLUSION

There are small technical differences between pediatric patients and adult patients in our study, but RIRS in children is as safe and efficient as it is in adults.

In-vitro and in-vivo new evidence for Flexor® Vue™ deflecting endoscopic system use: optimization of the stone free rate (SFR) after flexible ureteroscopy and Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy

To test in-vitro and in-vivo the Flexor® Vue™ deflecting endoscopic system (FVDES) as a new technology able to improve the removal of residual intrarenal fragments.This is an observational prospective "proof of concept" study performed in patients with renal calculi treated with flexible ureteroscopy and Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy (f-URS) in Humanitas Research Hospital (Rozzano, Italy). We assessed feasibility, efficacy and safety of FVDES as an in-vivo tool for removing residual fragments after f-URS. The stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days post-operatively was evaluated using CT. An in-vitro model was developed to evaluate the FVDES when used for this purpose.Eleven patients (M/F ratio: 7/4, mean age 63.5 ± 8.3) were treated. The stones were located in the lower calyces and the renal pelvis in 3 and 8 patients, respectively. Mean stone size was 18 ± 3.2 mm. The procedure with FVDES was feasible and effective in all the patients. Mean operative time was 82 ± 13.7 min and median hospitalization was of 1.5 days. The SFR after 90 days was 81% (9/11). We reported no relevant complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2); one patient had fever and was treated with antibiotics. The experimental in-vitro model demonstrated the efficacy of FVDES, allowing the removal of about 90% of fragments.Our study showed that FVDES is effective when used as a tool for retrieval of residual fragments at the end of f-URS. This technology could ensure a complete cleaning of the intrarenal collecting system and represent a safe alternative to basketing.

Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements

OBJECTIVES

Measurements of stone features may vary according to the non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) technique. Using magnified bone window is the most accurate method to measure urinary stones. Possible differences between stone measurements in different NCCT windows have not been evaluated in stones located in the kidney. The aim of this study is to compare measurements of kidney stone features between NCCT bone and soft tissue windows in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative and 90th postoperative day NCCT were performed in 92 consecutive symptomatic adult patients (115 renal units) with kidney stones between 5 mm to 20 mm (< 15 mm in the lower calyx) treated by RIRS. NCCT were evaluated in the magnified bone window and soft tissue window in three axes in a different time by a single radiologist blinded for the measurements of the NCCT other method.

RESULTS

Stone largest size (7.92±3.81 vs. 9.13±4.08; mm), volume (435.5±472.7 vs. 683.1±665.0; mm3) and density (989.4±330.2 vs. 893.0±324.6; HU) differed between bone and soft-tissue windows, respectively (p<0.0001) 5.2% of the renal units (6/115) were reclassified from residual fragments > 2 mm on soft tissue window to 0-2 mm on bone window.

CONCLUSION

Kidney stone measurements vary according to NCCT window. Measurements in soft tissue window NCCT of stone diameter and volume are larger and stone density is lesser than in bone window. These differences may have impact on clinical decisions.

Size is Not Everything That Matters: Preoperative CT Predictors of Stone Free After RIRS

OBJECTIVE

To define computed tomography (CT) predictors of residual fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones up to 20 mm in patients never submitted to surgical procedures for stone removal.

METHODS

From August 2016 to August 2017, symptomatic adult patients with kidney stones less than 20 mm treated by RIRS had their pre- and postoperative CT prospectively evaluated in search for predictors of residual stone fragments. Stone size, stone volume, number of stones, stone density, and location were evaluated in preoperative CT and analyzed as predictors for residual stone fragments on 90 POD CT. Stone location was represented by the infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) measured for each stone on preoperative noncontrast CT using multiplanar reconstruction.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were successfully submitted to RIRS. Bilateral procedures were performed in 23 patients (25%) resulting in 115 renal units operated. Operative time was 54.5 ± 26.7 minutes (mean ± SD) and 96.7% (89/92) of the patients were discharged up to 12 hours after the procedure. Postoperative CT demonstrated stone-free in 86 of 115 (74.8%), 0-2 mm in 10 of 115 (8.7%), and > 2 mm residual fragments in 19 of 115 (16.5%) procedures. Logistic regression analysis revealed steep IPA was a predictor for any residual stone fragment after RIRS for kidney stones < 20 mm (P= .012). ROC curve showed that IPA < 41° was associated with a higher chance of residual fragments after RIRS.

CONCLUSION

IPA < 41° is associated with a higher chance of residual fragments after RIRS for kidney stones up to 20 mm.

Prediction of stone-free status after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones

OBJECTIVE

To determine the possible factors effecting stone-free status (SFS) after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 100 consecutive patients who underwent RIRS. Unilateral procedures performed for single renal stones were included in the study. The studied parameters included patient demographics, stone characteristics (size, volume, location and attenuation according to Hounsfield unit [HU]), operation time, presence of preoperative double-J stent (DJS), use of ureteral access sheath (UAS) and SFS.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 100 patients where 43 of them were stone free and remaining 57 had residual stones. The mean age of the patients was 47.2±13.4 years. The mean stone size (largest dimension), stone attenuation and stone volume were 14.8±5.8 mm, 1010±416 HU and 937±929 mm³, respectively. The mean operative time was 60.8±24.2 minutes. Mean stone size, volume and HU were higher in the RS group compared to SF group but without any statistically significant difference, 15.2±6.1 vs. 14.2±5.3 mm, 1056±1037 mm³ vs. 780±745 mm³ and 1061±374 HU vs. 942±462 HU, respectively (p=0.490, p=0.135 and p=0.226). In multivariate regression analysis stone location and UAS use were found to be the significant predictors of SFS. Patients with lower pole stones are 2.25 times likely to have residual stones after RIRS compared to patient's having stones at other localizations (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stone volume could be a more reliable parameter than stone size in predicting RIRS success. Lower pole stone location and UAS use could be considered the most significant predictors of SFS after single session RIRS for single renal stones.