Versatile algorithmic midline approach to perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures

Algorithmic Midline Approach to Perineal Urethrostomy is Associated With Long-term Success and High Patient Satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

To assess surgical success and patient-reported outcomes of perineal urethrostomy via midline approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Charts of patients undergoing primary perineal urethrostomy between May 2008 and June 2022 were reviewed. Background characteristics were assessed; success was defined as freedom from re-intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using a cross-sectional phone survey. Several validated questionnaires were used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life, and erectile dysfunction.

RESULTS

Among 1768 urethroplasties performed over the study period, 103 patients (5.8%) underwent midline perineal urethrostomy. Surgery was successful in 95.1% of cases (98/103); 5 patients (4.9%) required re-intervention at a median of 8.7 months. Post-operative complications occurred in 5.8% of cases (6/103) and were both mild and self-limited. Forty-nine patients (47.6%) were reached via phone survey at a median of 61 months post-operatively. Some questions were not answered by all patients. Most patients (42/49, 86%) were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results, and 82% (40/49) reported an improvement in their overall health. Most patients (31/41, 76%) were unbothered by sitting to urinate. Although 20% of patients (10/49) reported post-operative urinary symptoms that interfered "a lot" with their daily life, only 3 (6%) of these patients reported dissatisfaction with the outcome. Regarding sexual function, 64% (27/42) reported indifference to or increased satisfaction with sexual encounters vs before surgery. The rate of de novo erectile dysfunction was 24% (12/49).

CONCLUSION

The midline approach to perineal urethrostomy provides excellent, durable success rates with high levels of patient satisfaction.

Analysis of prognostic factors of failure in perineal urethrostomy

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors of failure in patients undergoing perineal urethrostomy (PU) with Blandy technique, with inverted U-shaped perineal flap.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of PU of non-oncological causes (2001-2017). Data of age, BMI, history of diabetes mellitus, etiology of urethral stricture, type of stricture, previous surgeries, dilatation and suprapubic catheter were collected. Failure was defined as the need for any instrumentation after surgery. Variables were analyzed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 115 PU were performed. Median age was 61 years (IQR 53-68) and BMI 27.9 (IQR 25-30.9). The most frequent etiologies were: lichen sclerosus (30.4%), iatrogenic (27%), and idiopathic (25.7%). 62.6% had panurethral stricture. There were no complications in 73%. Clavien I complications occurred in 25.2%, Clavien II in 0.9% and Clavien IVa in 0.9%. The overall success rate was 51.3% with a median follow-up of 71 months. In the last 8 years, it was 75%. In the multivariate analysis, we found that age (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), date of surgery (p = 0.01), and suprapubic catheter (p = 0.003) were predictive variables. The voiding satisfaction rate was 88.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

PU with Blandy technique is a surgery with low morbidity. During the entire study period, it had a failure rate of 48.7% but the failure rate decreased to 25% over the last 8 years. Age, BMI, date of surgery and suprapubic catheter are the most important prognostic factor of failure.

Update on the management of complex strictures of the bulbar urethra

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review summarizes the most relevant literature published in 2019-2020 regarding urethroplasty for bulbar strictures.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified relevant papers focussing on new insights in the field of excision and primary anastomosis, graft augmentation urethroplasty and perineostomy for bulbar strictures and bulbomembranous strictures after radiotherapy or surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

SUMMARY

Respecting the vascularity of the anterior urethra and maintaining the integrity of surrounding structures during bulbar urethroplasty does not appear to deteriorate surgical outcomes and might be associated with improved functional outcomes.

Recurrent Anterior Urethral Stricture: Challenges and Solutions

Recurrent male anterior urethral stricture disease is a complex surgical challenge that should be managed by reconstructive urologists with experience in stricture management. Diagnosis of recurrence requires both anatomic narrowing and patient symptoms identified on validated questionnaires, with limited role for intervention in asymptomatic treatment “failures”. Endoscopic management has a very specific role in recurrence, and the choice of technique for urethroplasty depends on pre-operative urethrography and cystoscopy. Surgical success depends on addressing patient concerns, complete stricture excision, tissue quality optimization, and the use of multi-stage repair when indicated. Augmentation with genital skin flaps and/or grafts is often required, with buccal mucosa as the ideal graft source if local tissue is compromised. Salvage options including urinary diversion and perineal urethrostomy must also be considered in debilitated patients with severe disease or repeated treatment failures. Unique patient populations including patients with hypospadias and lichen sclerosis are among the highest risk for repeated recurrence and require special care in surgical technique, graft selection, and post-operative management.